Prokayrotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein (Pup) Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the first known post-translational small protein modifier in prokaryotes, and targets several proteins for degradation by a bacterial proteasome in a manner akin to ubiquitin (Ub) mediated proteolysis in eukaryotes. To determine the extent of pupylation in Mtb, we used tandem affinity purification to identify its “pupylome”. Mass spectrometry identified 55 out of 604 purified proteins with confirmed pupylation sites. Forty-four proteins, including those with and without identified pupylation sites, were tested as substrates of proteolysis in Mtb. Under steady state conditions, the majority of the test proteins did not accumulate in degradation mutants, suggesting not all targets of pupylation are necessarily substrates of the proteasome under steady state conditions. Four proteins implicated in Mtb pathogenesis, Icl (isocitrate lyase), Ino1 (inositol-1-phosphate synthase), MtrA (Mtb response regulator A) and PhoP (phosphate response regulator P), showed altered levels in degradation defective Mtb. Icl, Ino1 and MtrA accumulated in Mtb degradation mutants, suggesting these proteins are targeted to the proteasome. Unexpectedly, PhoP was present in wild type Mtb but undetectable in the degradation mutants. Taken together, these data demonstrate that pupylation regulates numerous proteins in Mtb and may not always lead to degradation.     

Activity of the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase Mpa is reversibly regulated by pupylation

Pupylation is a bacterial post-translational modification of target proteins on lysine residues with prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup. Pup-tagged substrates are recognized by a proteasome-interacting ATPase termed Mpa in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mpa unfolds pupylated substrates and threads them into the proteasome core particle for degradation. Interestingly, Mpa itself is also a pupylation target. Here, we show that the Pup ligase PafA predominantly produces monopupylated Mpa modified homogeneously on a single lysine residue within its C-terminal region. We demonstrate that this modification renders Mpa functionally inactive. Pupylated Mpa can no longer support Pup-mediated proteasomal degradation due to its inability to associate with the proteasome core. Mpa is further inactivated by rapid Pup- and ATPase-driven deoligomerization of the hexameric Mpa ring. We show that pupylation of Mpa is chemically and functionally reversible. Mpa regains its enzymatic activity upon depupylation by the depupylase Dop, affording a rapid and reversible activity control over Mpa function.     

Dop functions as a depupylase in the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like modification pathway

Post‐translational modification of proteins with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) is the bacterial equivalent of ubiquitination in eukaryotes. Mycobacterial pupylation is a two‐step process in which the carboxy‐terminal glutamine of Pup is first deamidated by Dop (deamidase of Pup) before ligation of the generated γ‐carboxylate to substrate lysines by the Pup ligase PafA. In this study, we identify a new feature of the pupylation system by demonstrating that Dop also acts as a depupylase in the Pup proteasome system in vivo and in vitro. Dop removes Pup from substrates by specific cleavage of the isopeptide bond. Depupylation can be enhanced by the unfolding activity of the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase Mpa.     

Molecular analysis of the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) conjugation pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Proteins targeted for degradation by the Mycobacterium proteasome are post‐translationally tagged with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup), an intrinsically disordered protein of 64 residues. In a process termed ‘pupylation’, Pup is synthesized with a terminal glutamine, which is deamidated to glutamate by Dop (deamidase of Pup) prior to attachment to substrate lysines by proteasome accessory factor A (PafA). Importantly, PafA was previously shown to be essential to cause lethal infections by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in mice. In this study we show that Dop, like PafA, is required for the full virulence of Mtb. Additionally, we show that Dop is not only involved in the deamidation of Pup, but also needed to maintain wild‐type steady state levels of pupylated proteins in Mtb. Finally, using structural models and site‐directed mutagenesis our data suggest that Dop and PafA are members of the glutamine synthetase fold family of proteins.     

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein remains intrinsically disordered when covalently attached to proteasomal target proteins

Background

The post-translational modification pathway referred to as pupylation marks proteins for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other actinobacteria by covalently attaching the small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) to target lysine residues. In contrast to the functionally analogous eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is intrinsically disordered in its free form. Its unfolded state allows Pup to adopt different structures upon interaction with different binding partners like the Pup ligase PafA and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. While the disordered behavior of free Pup has been well characterized, it remained unknown whether Pup adopts a distinct structure when attached to a substrate.

Results

Using a combination of NMR experiments and biochemical analysis we demonstrate that Pup remains unstructured when ligated to two well-established pupylation substrates targeted for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, malonyl transacylase (FabD) and ketopantoyl hydroxylmethyltransferase (PanB). Isotopically labeled Pup was linked to FabD and PanB by in vitro pupylation to generate homogeneously pupylated substrates suitable for NMR analysis. The single target lysine of PanB was identified by a combination of mass spectroscopy and mutational analysis. Chemical shift comparison between Pup in its free form and ligated to substrate reveals intrinsic disorder of Pup in the conjugate.

Conclusion

When linked to the proteasomal substrates FabD and PanB, Pup is unstructured and retains the ability to interact with its different binding partners. This suggests that it is not the conformation of Pup attached to these two substrates which determines their delivery to the proteasome, but the availability of the degradation complex and the depupylase.

     

Pupylated proteins in Corynebacterium glutamicum revealed by MudPIT analysis

In a manner similar to ubiquitin, the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) has been shown to target proteins for degradation via the proteasome in mycobacteria. However, not all actinobacteria possessing the Pup protein also contain a proteasome. In this study, we set out to study pupylation in the proteasome‐lacking non‐pathogenic model organism Corynebacterium glutamicum. A defined pup deletion mutant of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 grew aerobically as the parent strain in standard glucose minimal medium, indicating that pupylation is dispensable under these conditions. After expression of a Pup derivative carrying an aminoterminal polyhistidine tag in the Δpup mutant and Ni²⁺‐chelate affinity chromatography, pupylated proteins were isolated. Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) and MALDI‐TOF‐MS/MS of the elution fraction unraveled 55 proteins being pupylated in C. glutamicum and 66 pupylation sites. Similar to mycobacteria, the majority of pupylated proteins are involved in metabolism or translation. Our results define the first pupylome of an actinobacterial species lacking a proteasome, confirming that other fates besides proteasomal degradation are possible for pupylated proteins.     

The mycobacterial Mpa–proteasome unfolds and degrades pupylated substrates by engaging Pup's N‐terminus

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, along with other actinobacteria, harbours proteasomes in addition to members of the general bacterial repertoire of degradation complexes. In analogy to ubiquitination in eukaryotes, substrates are tagged for proteasomal degradation with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) that is recognized by the N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain of the ATPase Mpa (also called ARC). Here, we reconstitute the entire mycobacterial proteasome degradation system for pupylated substrates and establish its mechanistic features with respect to substrate recruitment, unfolding and degradation. We show that the Mpa–proteasome complex unfolds and degrades Pup‐tagged proteins and that this activity requires physical interaction of the ATPase with the proteasome. Furthermore, we establish the N‐terminal region of Pup as the structural element required for engagement of pupylated substrates into the Mpa pore. In this process, Mpa pulls on Pup to initiate unfolding of substrate proteins and to drag them toward the proteasome chamber. Unlike the eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is not recycled but degraded with the substrate. This assigns a dual function to Pup as both the Mpa recognition element as well as the threading determinant.     

The pupylation pathway and its role in mycobacteria

Pupylation is a post-translational protein modification occurring in actinobacteria through which the small, intrinsically disordered protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) is conjugated to lysine residues of proteins, marking them for proteasomal degradation. Although functionally related to ubiquitination, pupylation is carried out by different enzymes that are evolutionarily linked to bacterial carboxylate-amine ligases. Here, we compare the mechanism of Pup-conjugation to target proteins with ubiquitination, describe the evolutionary emergence of pupylation and discuss the importance of this pathway for survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the host.     

A further case of Dop‐ing in bacterial pupylation

Two recent studies, one in this issue of EMBO reports and one in Molecular Cell, identify Dop as a depupylase, ascribing a novel function to Dop and providing further evidence for the functional similarity of the prokaryotic Pup-modification system and the eukaryotic ubiquitin system.EMBO Rep (2010) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.119Protein homeostasis is fundamental to the function of all cellular systems. In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway mediates regulated protein degradation. Intensive studies of the eukaryotic proteasome over the past decades have unravelled the complexity of this multi-subunit, ATP-dependent protease, and proteasome inhibitors are now established anticancer drugs (Finley, 2009). Prokaryotes use ATP-dependent proteases—such as Lon, ClpP and FtsH—for protein degradation. In addition, some bacteria in the class of Actinomycetes have acquired a proteasome which shares sequence and structural homology with its eukaryotic counterpart (Darwin, 2009). The function of the prokaryotic proteasome and its implication in pathogenesis is the subject of ongoing research. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, proteasome activity is essential for the pathogen to persist in macrophages of the lung epithelium and could therefore be a target for antimicrobial treatment (Darwin, 2009).Labelling substrates for proteasomal degradation is well understood in eukaryotes, in which ubiquitin is attached to proteins that are subsequently recognized by proteasomal subunits and degraded (Finley, 2009). A similar tagging system has recently been identified in M. tuberculosis, in which the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) serves as a ubiquitin analogue (Pearce et al, 2008). Subsequent proteome-wide studies have identified hundreds of Pup-tagged substrates in different mycobacteria, defining the ‘pupylome'' (Festa et al, 2010; Poulsen et al, 2010). Pupylated proteins are recognized by the proteasome-associated ATPase Mpa, that unfolds proteins before they are degraded in the proteolytic core (Darwin, 2009).Ubiquitination is reversed by specific deubiquitinases, but whether pupylation is also reversible was previously unknown. Two studies by Darwin and colleagues and—in this issue of EMBO reports—by Weber-Ban and colleagues have now demonstrated that Pup is removed from substrates when incubated with mycobacterial lysates (Burns et al, 2010; Imkamp et al, 2010). This suggests the presence of one or more ‘depupylases'', and indicates that pupylation is a complex and versatile process, much like ubiquitination.Pup and ubiquitin conjugation are mechanistically unrelated; ubiquitin is ligated by its carboxy-terminal glycine residue to lysine residues of target proteins by an enzymatic cascade, comprising E1, E2 and E3 enzymes (Dye & Schulman, 2007). By contrast, the pupylation machinery seems to be simpler; a single ligating enzyme, proteasome accessory factor A (PafA), mediates isopeptide bond formation between the C-terminal glutamic acid side-chain carboxyl group of Pup and a substrate lysine residue (Sutter et al, 2010).Only about half of the Pup-containing bacteria encode a glutamic acid residue at the C-terminus (Striebel et al, 2009). In the remaining species, including M. tuberculosis, the Pup gene encodes a C-terminal glutamine, which requires deamidation to glutamic acid before conjugation to substrates can occur. This activating deamidation step is carried out by the deamidase of Pup (Dop; Striebel et al, 2009). Curiously, the dop gene is conserved in all Pup-containing bacterial species (with the exception of Plesiocystis pacifica), including those in which initial deamidation is unnecessary.Imkamp et al and Burns et al now identify Dop as a depupylase in the Pup-modification pathway. Hydrolysis of Pup from model substrates in vitro is abolished in a dop-deficient bacterial lysate, or in lysate expressing a mutant form of dop, but can be restored by complementation with dop. Dop is able to depupylate many proteins when tested against the pupylome, suggesting a broad substrate spectrum. By contrast, without Dop the pupylome is unchanged over time, indicating that Dop might be the main depupylase in Mycobacteria. Purified Dop from M. tuberculosis shows depupylase activity against model substrates. Finally, Imkamp et al analyse a Dop homologue from Corynebacterium glutamicum that encodes Pup^Glu and hence does not depend on deamidation. This Dop homologue is expressed recombinantly and purified from Escherichia coli—which does not harbour the Pup-proteasome system—and shown to be an active depupylase in vitro.Both groups then investigated the functional relationship between Pup/Dop and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. Burns et al found that Mpa is required in vivo for depupylation of a proteasome substrate. Imkamp et al found that Mpa significantly increases depupylation activity in vitro. The mechanism for this remains unclear, but full-length Pup seems to be essential for Mpa-mediated activation, as depupylation is not enhanced with an amino-terminally truncated Pup. Previous work has indicated that the N-terminus of Pup is required to initiate substrate unfolding (Striebel et al, 2010), and Imkamp et al speculated that unfolding makes the isopeptide bond more accessible for interaction with Dop. Evidence for this comes from the observation that Dop can cleave a peptide substrate with an accessible isopeptide bond at the same rate in the presence or absence of Mpa. It is intriguing that Dop co-purifies with the pupylome (Burns et al, 2010), this suggests that Dop has significant affinity but low activity for pupylated substrates. This might, however, prime the system for depupylation after Mpa interaction.Corynebacteria do not have a proteasome, but maintain the pupylation machinery comprising Pup, PafA, Dop and the proteasomal ATPase ARC (a homologue of Mpa). Here, the fate of Pup-tagged proteins cannot be proteasomal degradation, although substrate unfolding by ARC could initiate degradation by other proteases. However, pupylation in proteasome-deficient bacteria might suggest additional non-degradative functions for pupylation.Both studies demonstrate that Dop acts as a depupylase in Pup-containing bacteria, in addition to the previously reported deamidation role of Dop in mycobacteria. In fact, the chemical reactions underlying depupylation and deamidation are mechanistically similar. The key functional question that remains is whether Dop protects substrates from proteasomal degradation. Alternative explanations are that Dop acts in conjunction with Mpa or the proteasome to recycle Pup, or that it reverses non-degradative roles of pupylation (Fig 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Emerging roles for Dop. (A) The pupylation system. (1) Dop functions as a deamidase, converting Pup^Gln to Pup^Glu. PafA ligates Pup^Glu to substrates, which are targeted to Mpa and the proteasome and are degraded. (2) Dop can reverse pupylation on substrates and might rescue substrates from degradation. (B) Dop might act to recycle Pup, either (3a) at the Mpa/proteasome level or (3b) by binding to pupylated substrates, where Mpa-mediated substrate unfolding activates Dop. (C) (4) The existence of Dop in proteasome deficient bacteria might indicate that Dop antagonizes non-degradational roles for Pup. Dop, deamidase of Pup; Mpa, Mycobacterium proteasome-associated ATPase; PafA, proteasome accessory factor A; Pup, prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein.So far, nothing is known about the regulation of Dop. It will be interesting to analyse expression profiles to determine whether Dop is regulated independently of other proteins in this system. Other open questions remain about the existence of co-factors and binding partners, and the organization of the Pup–Dop–Mpa network. Structural studies of the Dop enzyme will hopefully increase our understanding of its roles in depupylation.In conclusion, Dop in the pupylation system has the potential to combine all known functions of deubiquitinases in the ubiquitin system: processing of precursors, rescuing substrates from degradation, recycling the modifier and reversing potential non-degradative roles of pupylation. The identification of the first depupylase opens an exciting new research field to unravel the functional consequences of depupylation.     

A time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer assay to measure activity of the deamidase of the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein

The modification of proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) targets them for degradation by mycobacterial proteasomes. Although functionally similar to eukaryotic deubiquitylating enzymes, the deamidase of Pup, called Dop, has no known mammalian homologs. Because Dop is necessary for persistent infection by Mtb, its selective inhibition holds potential for tuberculosis therapy. To facilitate high-throughput screens for Dop inhibitors, we developed a time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer (TR–FRET)-based assay for Dop function. The TR–FRET assay was successfully applied to determine the Michaelis constant for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding and to test the cofactor tolerance of Dop.     

Bacterial Proteasome Activator Bpa (Rv3780) Is a Novel Ring-Shaped Interactor of the Mycobacterial Proteasome

The occurrence of the proteasome in bacteria is limited to the phylum of actinobacteria, where it is maintained in parallel to the usual bacterial compartmentalizing proteases. The role it plays in these organisms is still not fully understood, but in the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) the proteasome supports persistence in the host. In complex with the ring-shaped ATPase Mpa (called ARC in other actinobacteria), the proteasome can degrade proteins that have been post-translationally modified with the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup. Unlike for the eukaryotic proteasome core particle, no other bacterial proteasome interactors have been identified to date. Here we describe and characterize a novel bacterial proteasome activator of Mycobacterium tuberculosis we termed Bpa (Rv3780), using a combination of biochemical and biophysical methods. Bpa features a canonical C-terminal proteasome interaction motif referred to as the HbYX motif, and its orthologs are only found in those actinobacteria encoding the proteasomal subunits. Bpa can inhibit degradation of Pup-tagged substrates in vitro by competing with Mpa for association with the proteasome. Using negative-stain electron microscopy, we show that Bpa forms a ring-shaped homooligomer that can bind coaxially to the face of the proteasome cylinder. Interestingly, Bpa can stimulate the proteasomal degradation of the model substrate β-casein, which suggests it could play a role in the removal of non-native or damaged proteins.     

Deletion of dop in Mycobacterium smegmatis abolishes pupylation of protein substrates in vivo

Proteasome‐bearing bacteria make use of a ubiquitin‐like modification pathway to target proteins for proteasomal turnover. In a process termed pupylation, proteasomal substrates are covalently modified with the small protein Pup that serves as a degradation signal. Pup is attached to substrate proteins by action of PafA. Prior to its attachment, Pup needs to undergo deamidation at its C‐terminal residue, converting glutamine to glutamate. This step is catalysed in vitro by Dop. In order to characterize Dop activity in vivo, we generated a dop deletion mutant in Mycobacterium smegmatis. In the Δdop strain, pupylation is severely impaired and the steady‐state levels of two known proteasomal substrates are drastically increased. Pupylation can be re‐established by complementing the mutant with either DopWt or a Pup variant carrying a glutamate at its ultimate C‐terminal position (PupGGE). Our data show that Pup is deamidated by Dop in vivo and that likely Dop alone is responsible for this activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a putative N‐terminal ATP‐binding motif is crucial for catalysis, as a single point mutation (E10A) in this motif abolishes Dop activity both in vivo and in vitro.     

Computational Identification of Protein Pupylation Sites by Using Profile-Based Composition of k-Spaced Amino Acid Pairs

Prokaryotic proteins are regulated by pupylation, a type of post-translational modification that contributes to cellular function in bacterial organisms. In pupylation process, the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) tagging is functionally analogous to ubiquitination in order to tag target proteins for proteasomal degradation. To date, several experimental methods have been developed to identify pupylated proteins and their pupylation sites, but these experimental methods are generally laborious and costly. Therefore, computational methods that can accurately predict potential pupylation sites based on protein sequence information are highly desirable. In this paper, a novel predictor termed as pbPUP has been developed for accurate prediction of pupylation sites. In particular, a sophisticated sequence encoding scheme [i.e. the profile-based composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs (pbCKSAAP)] is used to represent the sequence patterns and evolutionary information of the sequence fragments surrounding pupylation sites. Then, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier is trained using the pbCKSAAP encoding scheme. The final pbPUP predictor achieves an AUC value of 0.849 in10-fold cross-validation tests and outperforms other existing predictors on a comprehensive independent test dataset. The proposed method is anticipated to be a helpful computational resource for the prediction of pupylation sites. The web server and curated datasets in this study are freely available at http://protein.cau.edu.cn/pbPUP/.     

Reconstitution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis pupylation pathway in Escherichia coli

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) is a post-translational modifier that attaches to more than 50 proteins in Mycobacteria. Proteasome accessory factor A (PafA) is responsible for Pup conjugation to substrates, but the manner in which proteins are selected for pupylation is unknown. To address this issue, we reconstituted the pupylation of model Mycobacterium proteasome substrates in Escherichia coli, which does not encode Pup or PafA. Surprisingly, Pup and PafA were sufficient to pupylate at least 51 E. coli proteins in addition to the mycobacterial proteins. These data suggest that pupylation signals are intrinsic to targeted proteins and might not require Mycobacterium-specific cofactors for substrate recognition by PafA in vivo.     

The Mechanism of Mycobacterium smegmatis PafA Self-Pupylation

PafA, the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) ligase, catalyzes the Pup modification of bacterial proteins and targets the substrates for proteasomal degradation. It has been reported that that M. smegmatis PafA can be poly-pupylated. In this study, the mechanism of PafA self-pupylation is explored. We found that K320 is the major target residue for the pupylation of PafA. During the self-pupylation of PafA, the attachment of the first Pup to PafA is catalyzed by the other PafA molecule through an intermolecular reaction, while the formation of the polymeric Pup chain is carried out in an intramolecular manner through the internal ligase activity of the already pupylated PafA. Among the three lysine residues, K7, K31 and K61, in M. smegmatis Pup, K7 and K31 are involved in the formation of the poly-Pup chain in PafA poly-pupylation. Poly-pupylation of PafA can be reversibly regulated by depupylase Dop. The polymeric Pup chain formed through K7/K31 linkage is much more sensitive to Dop than the mono-Pup directly attached to PafA. Moreover, self-pupylation of PafA is involved in the regulation of its stability in vivo in a proteasome-dependent manner, suggesting that PafA self-pupylation functions as a mechanism in the auto-regulation of the Pup-proteasome system.     

Stress-induced polyubiquitination of proteasomal ubiquitin receptors targets the proteolytic complex for autophagic degradation

Ubiquitin (Ub) is a small protein (8 kDa) found in all eukaryotic cells, which is conjugated covalently to numerous proteins, tagging them for recognition by a downstream effector. One of the best characterized functions of Ub is targeting proteins for either selective degradation by the proteasome, or for bulk degradation by the autophagy-lysosome system. The executing arm of the UPS is the 26S proteasome, a large multicatalytic complex. While much is known about the synthesis and assembly of the proteasome's subunits, the mechanism(s) underlying its removal has remained obscure, similar to that of many other components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Our recent study identified autophagy as the degrading mechanism for the mammalian proteasome, mostly under stress conditions. Amino acid starvation induces specific ubiquitination of certain 19S proteasomal subunits that is essential for its binding to SQSTM1/p62, the protein that shuttles the ubiquitinated proteasome to the autophagic machinery. SQSTM1 delivers ubiquitinated substrates for proteasomal degradation via interaction of its PB1 domain with the 19S proteasomal subunit PSMD4/Rpn10, in situations where the proteasome serves as a “predator." In contrast, we found that the UBA domain of SQSTM1 is essential for its interaction with the ubiquitinated proteasome and its delivery to the autophagosome, rendering the proteasome a “prey.”     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasomal ATPase Mpa has a β‐grasp domain that hinders docking with the proteasome core protease

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has a proteasome system that is essential for its ability to cause lethal infections in mice. A key component of the system is the proteasomal adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) Mpa, which captures, unfolds, and translocates protein substrates into the Mtb proteasome core particle for degradation. Here, we report the crystal structures of near full‐length hexameric Mtb Mpa in apo and ADP‐bound forms. Surprisingly, the structures revealed a ubiquitin‐like β‐grasp domain that precedes the proteasome‐activating carboxyl terminus. This domain, which was only found in bacterial proteasomal ATPases, buries the carboxyl terminus of each protomer in the central channel of the hexamer and hinders the interaction of Mpa with the proteasome core protease. Thus, our work reveals the structure of a bacterial proteasomal ATPase in the hexameric form, and the structure finally explains why Mpa is unable to stimulate robust protein degradation in vitro in the absence of other, yet‐to‐be‐identified co‐factors.     

Survival of mycobacteria depends on proteasome‐mediated amino acid recycling under nutrient limitation

Intracellular protein degradation is an essential process in all life domains. While in all eukaryotes regulated protein degradation involves ubiquitin tagging and the 26S‐proteasome, bacterial prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) tagging and proteasomes are conserved only in species belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria and Nitrospira. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the Pup‐proteasome system (PPS) is important for virulence, yet its physiological role in non‐pathogenic species has remained an enigma. We now report, using Mycobacterium smegmatis as a model organism, that the PPS is essential for survival under starvation. Upon nitrogen limitation, PPS activity is induced, leading to accelerated tagging and degradation of many cytoplasmic proteins. We suggest a model in which the PPS functions to recycle amino acids under nitrogen starvation, thereby enabling the cell to maintain basal metabolic activities. We also find that the PPS auto‐regulates its own activity via pupylation and degradation of its components in a manner that promotes the oscillatory expression of PPS components. As such, the destructive activity of the PPS is carefully balanced to maintain cellular functions during starvation.