Insect trace fossils in glyptodonts from Uruguay

Abstract

The association of vertebrate remains and invertebrate traces, although less studied than other bioerosion traces, provides important paleoecological information. This report describes Cubiculum ornatum Roberts, Rogers, and Foreman 2007 Roberts, E., R. Rogers, and B. Foreman. 2007. Continental insect borings in dinosaur bone: examples from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar and Utah. Journal of Paleontology 81(1):201–208.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Osteocallis Roberts, Rogers, and Foreman 2007 Roberts, E., R. Rogers, and B. Foreman. 2007. Continental insect borings in dinosaur bone: examples from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar and Utah. Journal of Paleontology 81(1):201–208.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and other unidentified insect traces from the dermal skeletal remains of glyptodonts found in Uruguay. They come from the Fray Bentos Formation (Late Oligocene), the Camacho Formation (Late Miocene) and the Dolores Formation (Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene). The reported traces were likely made by sarcosaprophagous beetles, which indicate depositional conditions with dry episodes in a warm climate for the referred stratigraphical units.     

Ichnogeny and bivalve bioerosion: examples from shell and wood substrates

Abstract

The ichnospecies Gastrochaneolites dijugus Kelly and Bromley 1984 Kelly, S. R. A., and R. G. Bromley. 1984. “Ichnological Nomenclature of Clavate Borings.” Palaeontology 27: 793–807.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and Teredolites longissimus Kelly and Bromley 1984 Kelly, S. R. A., and R. G. Bromley. 1984. “Ichnological Nomenclature of Clavate Borings.” Palaeontology 27: 793–807.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], attributed to the boring activity of gastrochaenoid and pholadid bivalves, are described respectively from the Miocene Vilanova Basin and the Pliocene Almería-Níjar Basin. Miocene and Pliocene traces are preserved as positive casts associated to invertebrate shells and wood fragments, respectively; in both cases, the host substrate (shells and wood) has been lost almost entirely by different taphonomic processes (mainly dissolution). For the first time in the fossil record, the complete ichnogenetic sequence of these two ichnospecies is described and figured.     

Macroborings in Otodus megalodon and Otodus chubutensis shark teeth from the submerged shelf of Onslow Bay,North Carolina,USA: implications for processes of lag deposit formation

Abstract

The shallow continental shelf in the Cape Fear Region of southwestern Onslow Bay, North Carolina, contains lag deposits with an abundance of megatoothed shark teeth belonging to Otodus megalodon (Agassiz 1835) and Otodus chubutensis (Ameghino 1906) that derive from the Pliocene Yorktown and Miocene Pungo River formations, respectively. These teeth exhibit different frequencies and orientations of macroborings identified as Gastrochaenolites torpedo Kelly and Bromley (1984 Kelly, S., and R. Bromley. 1984. “Ichnological Nomenclature of Clavate Borings.” Palaeontology 27: 793–807.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Gastrochaenolites lapidicus Kelly and Bromley (1984 Kelly, S., and R. Bromley. 1984. “Ichnological Nomenclature of Clavate Borings.” Palaeontology 27: 793–807.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Maeandropolydora sulcans Voigt (1965 Voigt, E. 1965. “Über parasitische Polychaeten in Kreide-Austern sowie einige andere in Muschelschalen bohrende Würmer.” Paläontologische Zeitschrift 39 (3–4): 193–211.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) and ?Entobia isp. attributed to endolithic bivalves, serpulid worms and clionaid sponges. Different frequencies and orientations of macroborings seen in lag deposits containing O. megalodon and O. chubutensis teeth are the result of repeated exhumation and reworking in response to bathymetrically controlled wave-based erosion during storm events and glacioeustatically driven sea-level cyclicity across Onslow Bay. Chronological ranges of O. megalodon and O. chubutensis teeth that contain macroborings indicate that these lag deposits may have been forming since the late early Miocene.     

Sciences of learning and development: Some thoughts from the learning sciences

ABSTRACT

This commentary extends and amplifies aspects of the Cantor, Osher, Berg, Steyer and Rose (2018 Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2018). Maleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science. doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) discussion about what we know about the nature of learning and its implications for how we educate students across the span from early childhood through advanced levels of formal education. The paper’s overall goal is to offer some guidance and clarification about how aspects of the Cantor et al. (2018 Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2018). Maleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science. doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) powerful vision of optimal and equitable development might be attained based on a view of what we mean by learning, the types of learning that matter, and ways to design environments for learning and development that allow all children to realize their potential. Three major topics are covered. The first concerns evolution of theories of learning as they relate to theories of development and the connection between the two. Emphasis is given to the power that comes from adopting a sociocultural perspective on the nature of learning and development. The second topic is a consideration of current targets of learning and development, including so-called 21^st century competencies and deep disciplinary learning. Emphasis is given to the cognitive, intrapersonal and interpersonal competency domains that integrate cognitive, affective, social and emotional processes. The third topic focuses on a set of research-based principles that can be used to design and implement powerful and equitable learning environments that align with sociocultural theories and learning and development while integrating the three major domains of competency.     

The crustaceans burrow Sinusichnus sinuosus from the Oligocene-Miocene carbonate deposits of eastern Amazonia

Abstract

Sinusichnus Gibert 1996 Gibert, J. M. d. 1996. “A New Decapod Burrow System from the NW Mediterranean Pliocene.” Revista Española de Paleontología 11: 251–254. [Google Scholar] is recorded for the first time in the Oligocene-Miocene Pirabas Formation of Northern Brazil. In these Oligocene-Miocene carbonate deposits, Sinusichnus sinuosus is characterized by horizontal, highly regular sinusoidal burrow systems with T- and H-shaped branching points. The main difference between the S. sinuosus described herein and other occurrences worldwide is the anomalous diameter of the burrows (4 to 10?cm). These trace fossils occur in organic matter-rich, wackestone/packstone and laminated mudstones interbedded with boundstones deposited in an inner carbonate platform paleoenvironment. The exceptional size of the studied S. sinuosus could have been associated to the producer’s size, which may be attributed to construction by large crustaceans, similar to fossils found within the Pirabas Formation. Also, the sinusoidal morphology and retrusive spreiten could be a result of the fodinichnial/domichnial behavior.