The Hox gene complement of acoel flatworms, a basal bilaterian clade

Several molecular data sets suggest that acoelomorph flatworms are not members of the phylum Platyhelminthes but form a separate branch of the Metazoa that diverged from all other bilaterian animals before the separation of protostomes and deuterostomes. Here we examine the Hox gene complement of the acoel flatworms. In two distantly related acoel taxa, we identify only three distinct classes of Hox gene: an anterior gene, a posterior gene, and a central class gene most similar to genes of Hox classes 4 and 5 in other Bilateria. Phylogenetic analysis of these genes, together with the acoel caudal homologue, supports the basal position of the acoels. The similar gene sets found in two distantly related acoels suggest that this reduced gene complement may be ancestral in the acoels and that the acoels may have diverged from other bilaterians before elaboration of the 8- to 10-gene Hox cluster that characterizes most bilaterians.     

Hox and ParaHox genes in evolution, development and genomics

The discovery of the homeobox motif and its presence in each gene of the Hox clusters revolutionized the fields of developmental biology and evolutionary developmental biology (1, 2),providing a rapid entrance into investigating the mechanisms of development of almost any animal taxon as well as dramatically altering conceptions on the extent of genetic conservation across the animal kingdom.     

Hox and ParaHox genes: A review on molluscs

Hox and ParaHox genes are involved in patterning the anterior‐posterior body axis in metazoans during embryo development. Body plan evolution and diversification are affected by variations in the number and sequence of Hox and ParaHox genes, as well as by their expression patterns. For this reason Hox and ParaHox gene investigation in the phylum Mollusca is of great interest, as this is one of the most important taxa of protostomes, characterized by a high morphological diversity. The comparison of the works reviewed here indicates that species of molluscs, belonging to different classes, share a similar composition of Hox and ParaHox genes. Therefore evidence suggests that the wide morphological diversity of this taxon could be ascribed to differences in Hox gene interactions and expressions and changes in the Hox downstream genes rather than to Hox cluster composition. Moreover the data available on Hox and ParaHox genes in molluscs compared with those of other Lophotrochozoa shed light on the complex and controversial evolutionary histories that these genes have undergone within protostomes. genesis 52:935–945, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Ciona intestinalis ParaHox genes: evolution of Hox/ParaHox cluster integrity,developmental mode,and temporal colinearity

The Hox gene cluster, and its evolutionary sister the ParaHox gene cluster, pattern the anterior-posterior axis of animals. The spatial and temporal regulation of the genes seems to be intimately linked to the gene order within the clusters. In some animals the tight organisation of the clusters has disintegrated. We note that these animals develop in a derived fashion relative to the norm of their respective lineages. Here we present the genomic organisation of the ParaHox genes of Ciona intestinalis, and note that tight clustering has been lost in evolution. We present a hypothesis that the Hox and ParaHox clusters are constrained as ordered clusters by the mechanisms producing temporal colinearity; when temporal colinearity is no longer needed or used during development, the clusters can fall apart. This disintegration may be mediated by the invasion of transposable elements into the clusters, and subsequent genomic rearrangements.     

Combined-method phylogenetic analysis of Hox and ParaHox genes of the metazoa

The clustered Hox genes show a conserved role in patterning the body axis of bilaterian metazoans. Increasingly, a broader phylogenetic sampling of non-model system organisms is being examined to detect a correlation, if any, between Hox gene evolution, and body plan innovations. To assess how Hox gene expression and function evolve with changing cluster arrangements, we must be able to reliably assign gene orthologies between Hox genes. Recent evidence suggests that a four-gene proto-Hox cluster duplicated to form the precursor of the present cluster and an additional sister-cluster, the ParaHox group. Here, phylogenetic methods are used to determine Hox-gene orthologies and to infer probable clustering events leading to the current bilaterian Hox complement. This analysis supports the ParaHox hypothesis and gives first confirmation that ind (intermediate neuroblasts defective) is an anterior ParaHox ortholog from protostomes. This analysis supports a proto-Hox cluster of four genes in which the central-class member of the ParaHox cluster may have been lost. It is also proposed here that ancestral diploblasts had central-class members of both Hox and ParaHox clusters. Primitive Hox gene ancestors are estimated by phylogenetic methods and found to have no strong affinity to any particular class of extant Hox members.     

Ancient origins of axial patterning genes: Hox genes and ParaHox genes in the Cnidaria

Among the bilaterally symmetrical, triploblastic animals (the Bilateria), a conserved set of developmental regulatory genes are known to function in patterning the anterior–posterior (AP) axis. This set includes the well-studied Hox cluster genes, and the recently described genes of the ParaHox cluster, which is believed to be the evolutionary sister of the Hox cluster ( Brooke et al. 1998 ). The conserved role of these axial patterning genes in animals as diverse as frogs and flies is believed to reflect an underlying homology (i.e., all bilaterians derive from a common ancestor which possessed an AP axis and the developmental mechanisms responsible for patterning the axis). However, the origin and early evolution of Hox genes and ParaHox genes remain obscure. Repeated attempts have been made to reconstruct the early evolution of Hox genes by analyzing data from the triphoblastic animals, the Bilateria ( Schubert et al. 1993 ; Zhang and Nei 1996 ). A more precise dating of Hox origins has been elusive due to a lack of sufficient information from outgroup taxa such as the phylum Cnidaria (corals, hydras, jellyfishes, and sea anemones). In combination with outgroup taxa, another potential source of information about Hox origins is outgroup genes (e.g., the genes of the ParaHox cluster). In this article, we present cDNA sequences of two Hox-like genes ( anthox2 and anthox6 ) from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that anthox2 (=Cnox2) is homologous to the GSX class of ParaHox genes, and anthox6 is homologous to the anterior class of Hox genes. Therefore, the origin of Hox genes and ParaHox genes occurred prior to the evolutionary split between the Cnidaria and the Bilateria and predated the evolution of the anterior–posterior axis of bilaterian animals. Our analysis also suggests that the central Hox class was invented in the bilaterian lineage, subsequent to their split from the Cnidaria.     

Hox clusters and bilaterian phylogeny

A large Hox cluster comprising at least seven genes has evolved by gene duplications in the ancestors of bilaterians. It probably emerged from a mini-cluster of three or four genes that was present before the divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians. The comparison of Hox structural data in bilaterian phyla shows that the genes of the anterior part of the cluster have been more conserved than those of the posterior part. Some specific signature sequences, present in the form of signature residues within the homeodomain or conserved peptides outside the homeodomain, constitute phylogenetic evidence for the monophyly of protostomes and their division into ecdysozoans and lophotrochozoans. These conserved motifs may provide decisive arguments for the phylogenetic position of some enigmatic phyla.     

Hox, ParaHox, ProtoHox: facts and guesses

The Hox gene cluster has captivated the imagination of evolutionary and developmental biologists worldwide. In this review, the origin of the Hox and ParaHox gene clusters by duplication of a ProtoHox gene cluster, and the changes in their gene numbers in major Metazoan Transitions are reviewed critically. Re-evaluation of existing data and recent findings in Cnidarians, Acoels, and critical stages of vertebrate evolution suggest alternative scenarios for the origin, structure, and changes in Hox gene numbers in relevant events of Metazoan evolution. I discuss opposing views and propose that (i) the ProtoHox cluster had only two genes, and not four as commonly believed: a corollary is that the origin of Bilaterians was coincident with the invention of new Hox and ParaHox gene classes, which may have facilitated such a transition; (ii) the ProtoHox cluster duplication was a cis duplication event, rather than a trans duplication event, as previously suggested, and (iii) the ancestral vertebrate cluster possessed 14 Hox genes, and not the 13 generally assumed. These hypotheses could be verified or refuted in the near future, but they may help critical discussion of the evolution of the Hox/ParaHox family in the metazoan kingdom.     

Stem cells in a basal bilaterian

In Platyhelminthes, totipotent stem cells (neoblasts) are supposed to be the only dividing cells. They are responsible for the renewal of all cell types during development, growth, and regeneration, a unique situation in the animal kingdom. In order to further characterize these cells, we have applied two immunocytochemical markers to detect neoblasts in different stages of the cell cycle in the acoel flatworm Convolutriloba longifissura: (1) the thymidine analog 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) to identify cells in S-phase, and (2) an antibody to phosphorylated histone H3 to locate mitosis. BrdU pulse-chase experiments were carried out to follow differentiation of neoblasts. We demonstrate the differentation into four labeled, differentiated cell types. S-phase cells and mitotic cells showed a homogenous distribution pattern throughout the body of C. longifissura. Two different types of S-phase cells could be distinguished immunocytochemically by their pattern of incorporated BrdU in the nuclei. Transmission electron microscopy was used to study ultrastructural characters of neoblasts and revealed two different stages in maturation of neoblasts, each with a characteristic organization of heterochromatin. The stem-cell pool of C. longifissura is an important prerequisite for the extraordinary mode of asexual reproduction and the high capacity of regeneration. A comparison of the stem-cell pool in Acoela and higher platyhelminth species can provide evidence for the phylogenetic relationships of these taxa.     

The Origin of Patterning Systems in Bilateria——Insights from the Hox and ParaHox Genes in Acoelomorpha

Hox and ParaHox genes constitute two families of developmental regulators that pattern the Anterior-Posterior body axis in all bilaterians.The members of these two groups of genes are usually arranged in genomic clusters and work in a coordinated fashion,both in space and in time. While the mechanistic aspects of their action are relatively well known,it is still unclear how these systems evolved. For instance,we still need a proper model of how the Hox and ParaHox clusters were assembled over time.This problem is due to the shortage of information on gene complements for many taxa (mainly basal metazoans) and the lack of a consensus phylogenetic model of animal relationships to which we can relate our new findings.Recently, several studies have shown that the Acoelomorpha most probably represent the first offshoot of the Bilateria. This finding has prompted us,and others, to study the Hox and ParaHox complements in these animals,as well as their activity during development.In this review,we analyze how the current knowledge of Hox and ParaHox genes in the Acoelomorpha is shaping our view of bilaterian evolution.     

Hox and ParaHox Genes in Flatworms: Characterization and Expression

Flatworms (phylum Platyhelminthes) are favourite organisms inDevelopmental Biology and Zoology because of their extraordinarypowers of regeneration and because they may hold a pivotal placein the origin and evolution of the Bilateria. Hox genes playkey roles in both processes: setting up the new anteroposteriorpattern in the former, and as qualitative markers of phylogeneticaffinities among bilaterian phyla in the latter. We have searchedfor Hox and ParaHox genes in several flatworm groups spanningfrom freshwater triclads to marine polyclads and, more recently,in the acoels, the likely earliest extant bilaterian. We haveisolated and sequenced eight Hox genes from the freshwater tricladGirardia tigrina and three Hox and two ParaHox genes from thepolyclad Discocelis tigrina. Data from the acoels Paratomellarubra and Convoluta roscoffensis is also reported. FlatwormHox sequences and 18S rDNA sequence data support clear affinitiesof Platyhelminthes to spiralian lophotrochozoans. The basalposition of acoel flatworms supported from recent 18S rDNA data,remains still uncertain. Expression of Hox genes in intact andregenerating adult organisms show nested patterns with gradedanterior expression boundaries, or ubiquitous expression. Newapproaches to study the function of Hox genes in flatworms,such as RNA interference are briefly discussed.     

Dismissal of Acoelomorpha: Acoela and Nemertodermatida are separate early bilaterian clades

We used new 18S and 28S rRNA sequences analysed with parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods of phylogenetic reconstruction to show that Nemertodermatida, generally classified as the sister group of Acoela within the recently proposed Phylum Acoelomorpha, are a separate basal bilaterian lineage. We used several analytical approaches to control for possible long branch attraction (LBA) artefacts in our results. Parsimony and the model based phylogenetic reconstruction methods that incorporate 'corrections' for substitution rate heterogenities yielded concordant results. When putative long branch taxa were experimentally removed the resulting topologies were consistent with our total evidence analysis. Deletion of fast-evolving nucleotide sites decreased resolution and clade support, but did not support a topology conflicting with the total evidence analysis. Establishment of Acoela and Nemertodermatida as two early lineages facilitates reconstruction of ancestral bilaterian features. The ancestor of extant Bilateria was a small, benthic direct developer without coelom or a planktonic larval stage. The previously proposed Phylum Acoelomorpha is dismissed as paraphyletic.     

Genomic organization of Hox and ParaHox clusters in the echinoderm,Acanthaster planci

The organization of echinoderm Hox clusters is of interest due to the role that Hox genes play in deuterostome development and body plan organization, and the unique gene order of the Hox complex in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, which has been linked to the unique development of the axial region. Here, it has been reported that the Hox and ParaHox clusters of Acanthaster planci, a corallivorous starfish found in the Pacific and Indian oceans, generally resembles the chordate and hemichordate clusters. The A. planci Hox cluster shared with sea urchins the loss of one of the medial Hox genes, even‐skipped (Evx) at the anterior of the cluster, as well as organization of the posterior Hox genes. genesis 52:952–958, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A non-tree-based comprehensive study of metazoan Hox and ParaHox genes prompts new insights into their origin and evolution

Background  

Hox and the closely-related ParaHox genes, which emerged prior to the divergence between cnidarians and bilaterians, are the most well-known members of the ancient genetic toolkit that controls embryonic development across all metazoans. Fundamental questions relative to their origin and evolutionary relationships remain however unresolved. We investigate here the evolution of metazoan Hox and ParaHox genes using the HoxPred program that allows the identification of Hox genes without the need of phylogenetic tree reconstructions.     

Hox genes in a pentameral animal

There is renewed interest in how the different body plans of extant phyla are related. This question has traditionally been addressed by comparisons between vertebrates and Drosophila. Fortunately, there is now increasing emphasis on animals representing other phyla. Pentamerally symmetric echinoderms are a bilaterian metazoan phylum whose members exhibit secondarily derived radial symmetry. Precisely how their radially symmetric body plan originated from a bilaterally symmetric ancestor is unknown, however, two recent papers address this subject. Peterson et al. propose a hypothesis on evolution of the anteroposterior axis in echinoderms, and Arenas-Mena et al. examine expression of five posterior Hox genes during development of the adult sea urchin.     

The Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians and not members of the Platyhelminthes

Recent hypotheses on metazoan phylogeny have recognized three main clades of bilaterian animals: Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa. The acoelomate and 'pseudocoelomate' metazoans, including the Platyhelminthes, long considered basal bilaterians, have been referred to positions within these clades by many authors. However, a recent study based on ribosomal DNA placed the flatworm group Acoela as the sister group of all other extant bilaterian lineages. Unexpectedly, the nemertodermatid flatworms, usually considered the sister group of the Acoela together forming the Acoelomorpha, were grouped separately from the Acoela with the rest of the Platyhelminthes (the Rhabditophora) within the Lophotrochozoa. To re-evaluate and clarify the phylogenetic position of the Nemertodermatida, new sequence data from 18S ribosomal DNA and mitochondrial genes of nemertodermatid and other bilaterian species were analysed with parsimony and maximum likelihood methods. The analyses strongly support a basal position within the Bilateria for the Nemertodermatida as a sister group to all other bilaterian taxa except the Acoela. Despite the basal position of both Nemertodermatida and Acoela, the clade Acoelomorpha was not retrieved. These results imply that the last common ancestor of bilaterian metazoans was a small, benthic, direct developer without segments, coelomic cavities, nephrida or a true brain. The name Nephrozoa is proposed for the ancestor of all bilaterians excluding the Nemertodermatida and the Acoela, and its descendants.