OmpR regulates the stationary-phase acid tolerance response of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium

Tolerance to acidic environments is an important property of free-living and pathogenic enteric bacteria. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium possesses two general forms of inducible acid tolerance. One is evident in exponentially growing cells exposed to a sudden acid shock. The other is induced when stationary-phase cells are subjected to a similar shock. These log-phase and stationary-phase acid tolerance responses (ATRs) are distinct in that genes identified as participating in log-phase ATR have little to no effect on the stationary-phase ATR (I. S. Lee, J. L. Slouczewski, and J. W. Foster, J. Bacteriol. 176:1422-1426, 1994). An insertion mutagenesis strategy designed to reveal genes associated with acid-inducible stationary-phase acid tolerance (stationary-phase ATR) yielded two insertions in the response regulator gene ompR. The ompR mutants were defective in stationary-phase ATR but not log-phase ATR. EnvZ, the known cognate sensor kinase, and the porin genes known to be controlled by OmpR, ompC and ompF, were not required for stationary-phase ATR. However, the alternate phosphodonor acetyl phosphate appears to play a crucial role in OmpR-mediated stationary-phase ATR and in the OmpR-dependent acid induction of ompC. This conclusion was based on finding that a mutant form of OmpR, which is active even though it cannot be phosphorylated, was able to suppress the acid-sensitive phenotype of an ack pta mutant lacking acetyl phosphate. The data also revealed that acid shock increases the level of ompR message and protein in stationary-phase cells. Thus, it appears that acid shock induces the production of OmpR, which in its phosphorylated state can trigger expression of genes needed for acid-induced stationary-phase acid tolerance.     

The osmotic regulator OmpR is involved in the response of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 to environmental stresses and survival within macrophages

Various environmental signals control the expression of the virulence factors in pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains. The role of the osmotic regulator OmpR protein in controlling the production of Yop proteins, virulence determinants in Y. enterocolitica O:9 (European type) has been studied. An ompR deletion mutant was constructed via allelic exchange with an ompR gene of Y. enterocolitica mutagenized in vitro by a reverse genetic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based strategy. The ompR mutant showed a reduced ability to survive under conditions of various environmental stresses in vitro. In particular, low pH stress resulted in increased cell mortality levels. Under conditions of high osmolarity, the wild strain's Yop protein production was reduced, whereas protein levels from the mutant strain remained constant regardless of osmolarity variance. In J774A.1 macrophage cell culture survival of the ompR mutant was decidedly lower than that of the wild-type strain, suggesting that the OmpR protein may play a significant role in protecting cells against intracellular conditions associated with macrophage phagocytosis.     

Understanding the acid tolerance response of bifidobacteria

Aims: To investigate the effect of pH on the viability and the acid tolerance response (ATR) of bifidobacteria. Methods and Results: The impact of low pH on the viability of five species of bifidobacteria was examined under conditions of strict anaerobiosis. Although differences in the ability to resist the lethal effects of low pH were apparent among the species, cell viability could be improved by the provision of fermentable substrate during an acidic pH stress or through the use of stationary phase cells. While a stationary phase ATR was found to occur in two species of bifidobacteria, there was no adaptive response in exponential phase cells. Proteomic analysis of exponential phase Bifidobacterium longum subjected to a mild acid pre‐exposure (pH 4·5, 2 h) prior to an acid challenge revealed a substantial loss in the total number of cellular proteins. In contrast, proteomic analysis of stationary phase cells revealed an increased abundance of proteins associated with the general stress response as well as the β‐subunit of the F₀F₁‐ATPase, known to be important in bifidobacteria acid tolerance. Conclusion: Neither Bif. longum or Bifidobacterium breve possesses an inducible exponential phase ATR. Significance and Impact of the Study: These findings provide further insights into the impact of pH on the viability of bifidobacteria and may partially explain the loss in viability associated with their storage in acid foods.     

Salmonella acid shock proteins are required for the adaptive acid tolerance response.

Salmonella typhimurium, as well as other enteric bacteria, experiences significant fluctuations in H+ ion concentrations during growth in diverse ecological niches. In fact, some pH conditions which should kill cells rapidly, such as stomach acidity, are nevertheless tolerated. The complete mechanism for this tolerance is unknown. However, I have recently demonstrated that S. typhimurium has the ability to survive extreme low pH (pH 3.0 to 4.0) if first adapted to mild pH (pH 5.5 to 6.0). This phenomenon has been referred to as the acidification tolerance response (ATR). The exposure to mild acid is referred to as preshock, and the proteins involved are called preshock ATR proteins. A second type of encounter with acid, called acid shock, involves shifting cells directly from alkaline conditions (pH 7.7) to acid conditions (pH 4.5 or below). During acid shock, the organism immediately ceases reproduction and dramatically changes the expression of at least 52 proteins. All but four are distinct from the preshock ATR proteins. Surprisingly, acid shock alone did not afford significant protection against strong acid challenge in minimal medium. Furthermore, inhibiting protein synthesis prior to acid shock revealed that the acid shock proteins do not appear to contribute to acid survival in minimal medium even at pH 4.3. Constitutive cellular pH homeostatic mechanisms seem sufficient to protect cells at this pH. The data suggest that the induction of acid shock and preshock ATR proteins are separate processes requiring separate signals. However, for S. typhimurium to survive extreme acid conditions, it must induce both the preshock and acid shock systems. Preventing the expression of one or the other eliminates acid tolerance. I propose a two-stage process that allows S. typhimurium to phase in acid tolerance as the environmental pH becomes progressively more acidic.     

A low-pH-inducible, stationary-phase acid tolerance response in Salmonella typhimurium.

Acid is an important environmental condition encountered by Salmonella typhimurium during its pathogenesis. Our studies have shown that the organism can actively adapt to survive potentially lethal acid exposures by way of at least three possibly overlapping systems. The first is a two-stage system induced in response to low pH by logarithmic-phase cells called the log-phase acid tolerance response (ATR). It involves a major molecular realignment of the cell including the induction of over 40 proteins. The present data reveal that two additional systems of acid resistance occur in stationary-phase cells. One is a pH-dependent system distinct from log-phase ATR called stationary-phase ATR. It was shown to provide a higher level of acid resistance than log-phase ATR but involved the synthesis of fewer proteins. Maximum induction of stationary-phase ATR occurred at pH 4.3. A third system of acid resistance is not induced by low pH but appears to be part of a general stress resistance induced by stationary phase. This last system requires the alternative sigma factor, RpoS. Regulation of log-phase ATR and stationary-phase ATR remains RpoS independent. Although the three systems are for the most part distinct from each other, together they afford maximum acid resistance for S. typhimurium.     

Interaction of OmpR, a positive regulator, with the osmoregulated ompC and ompF genes of Escherichia coli. Studies with wild-type and mutant OmpR proteins

The OmpR protein is a positive regulator involved in osmoregulatory expression of the ompC and ompF genes that specify the major outer membrane proteins OmpC and OmpF, respectively. We purified the OmpR protein not only from wild-type cells but also from two ompR mutants (ompR2 and ompR3) exhibiting quite different phenotypes as to osmoregulation of the ompC and ompF genes. The OmpR2 protein has an amino acid conversion in the C-terminal portion of the OmpR polypeptide, whereas the OmpR3 protein has one in the N-terminal portion. Comparative studies on these purified OmpR proteins were carried out in terms of their interaction with the ompC and ompF promoters. The nucleotide sequences involved in OmpR-binding were determined in individual promoter regions by deoxyribonuclease I footprinting. The OmpR3 protein as well as the wild-type OmpR protein appeared to bind, to similar extents, to both the ompC and ompF promoters. In contrast, the OmpR2 protein bound preferentially to the ompF promoter and failed to protect the ompC promoter against DNAse I digestion. These results support the view that the C-terminal portion of the OmpR protein is responsible for the binding of the OmpR protein to the ompC and ompF promoter DNAs. Based on these results, the structure and function of the OmpR protein are discussed in relation to the mechanism of osmoregulation.     

Interaction of EnvZ,a sensory histidine kinase,with phosphorylated OmpR,the cognate response regulator

EnvZ is a sensory histidine kinase in Escherichia coli to regulate the phosphorylation of OmpR, its cognate response regulator, required for the expression of genes for outer membrane porin proteins. Here, we re-examined the recent paper Mattison and Kenney, in which the authors reported that phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P) is unable to bind to EnvZ, thus casting doubts on the role of the EnvZ phosphatase activity in vivo. Using an identical method, the Kd value for the interaction of the fluorescein-labelled OmpR (Fl-OmpR) with EnvZc was determined to be 1.96 +/- 0.28 micro M. We demonstrated that OmpR-P as well as OmpR inhibited the interaction of Fl-OmpR with EnvZc. Their 50% inhibitory concentrations were 1.09 +/- 0.25 micro M and 0.89 +/- 0.14 micro M, respectively, under the conditions used. The interaction between His-10-OmpR and EnvZc was also inhibited almost equally with OmpR-P and OmpR. Fluorescein labelling of OmpR was highly heterogeneous as detected by mass spectrometry, even though it slightly affected the OmpR phosphorylation (kinase) and the dephosphorylation of OmpR-P (phosphatase), indicating that EnvZc is able to interact with Fl-OmpR or Fl-OmpR-P as well as with OmpR or OmpR-P as a substrate. We demonstrated that OmpR-P is able to interact with EnvZc with a similar affinity to OmpR and serves as an effective substrate for the EnvZ phosphatase. These findings support the hypothesis that osmotic signals regulate the level of the cellular concentration of OmpR-P by modulating the ratio of kinase to phosphatase activity of the bifunctional enzymatic activities of EnvZ.     

Phosphorylation alters the interaction of the response regulator OmpR with its sensor kinase EnvZ.

OmpR and EnvZ comprise a two-component system that regulates the porin genes ompF and ompC in response to changes in osmolarity. EnvZ is autophosphorylated by intracellular ATP on a histidine residue, and it transfers the phosphoryl group to an aspartic acid residue of OmpR. EnvZ can also dephosphorylate phospho-OmpR (OmpR-P) to control the cellular level of OmpR-P. At low osmolarity, OmpR-P levels are low because of either low EnvZ kinase or high EnvZ phosphatase activities. At high osmolarity, OmpR-P is elevated. It has been proposed that EnvZ phosphatase is the activity that is regulated by osmolarity. OmpR is a two-domain response regulator; phosphorylation of OmpR increases its affinity for DNA, and DNA binding stimulates phosphorylation. The step that is affected by DNA depends upon the phosphodonor employed. In the present work, we have used fluorescence anisotropy and phosphotransfer assays to examine OmpR interactions with EnvZ. Our results indicate that phosphorylation greatly reduces the affinity of OmpR for the kinase, whereas DNA does not affect their interaction. The results presented cast serious doubts on the role of the EnvZ phosphatase in response to signaling in vivo.     

ppGpp-dependent stationary phase induction of genes on Salmonella pathogenicity island 1

We have examined expression of the genes on Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1) during growth under the physiologically well defined standard growth condition of Luria-Bertani medium with aeration. We found that the central regulator hilA and the genes under its control are expressed at the onset of stationary phase. Interestingly, the two-component regulatory genes hilC/hilD, sirA/barA, and ompR, which are known to modulate expression from the hilA promoter (hilAp) under so-called "inducing conditions" (Luria-Bertani medium containing 0.3 m NaCl without aeration), acted under standard conditions at the stationary phase induction level. The induction of hilAp depended not on RpoS, the stationary phase sigma factor, but on the stringent signal molecule ppGpp. In the ppGpp null mutant background, hilAp showed absolutely no activity. The stationary phase induction of hilAp required spoT but not relA. Consistent with this requirement, hilAp was also induced by carbon source deprivation, which is known to transiently elevate ppGpp mediated by spoT function. The observation that amino acid starvation elicited by the addition of serine hydroxamate did not induce hilAp in a RelA(+) SpoT(+) strain suggested that, in addition to ppGpp, some other alteration accompanying entry into the stationary phase might be necessary for induction. It is speculated that during the course of infection Salmonella encounters various stressful environments that are sensed and translated to the intracellular signal, ppGpp, which allows expression of Salmonella virulence genes, including SPI1 genes.