The requirement of specific membrane domains for Raf-1 phosphorylation and activation

Activation of Raf-1 by Ras requires recruitment to the membrane as well as additional phosphorylations, including phosphorylation at serine 338 (Ser-338) and tyrosine 341 (Tyr-341). In this study we show that Tyr-341 participates in the recruitment of Raf-1 to specialized membrane domains called "rafts," which are required for Raf-1 to be phosphorylated on Ser-338. Raf-1 is also thought to be recruited to the small G protein Rap1 upon GTP loading of Rap1. However, this does not result in Raf-1 activation. We propose that this is because Raf-1 is not phosphorylated on Tyr-341 upon recruitment to Rap1. Redirecting Rap1 to Ras-containing membranes or mimicking Tyr-341 phosphorylation of Raf-1 by mutation converts Rap1 into an activator of Raf-1. In contrast to Raf-1, B-Raf is activated by Rap1. We suggest that this is because B-Raf activation is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation. Moreover, mutants that render B-Raf dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation are no longer activated by Rap1.     

Serine and tyrosine phosphorylations cooperate in Raf-1, but not B-Raf activation

The Raf family of serine/threonine protein kinases couple growth factor receptor stimulation to mitogen activated protein kinase activation, but their own regulation is poorly understood. Using phospho-specific antisera, we show that activated Raf-1 is phosphorylated on S338 and Y341. Expression of Raf-1 with oncogenic Ras gives predominantly S338 phosphorylation, whereas activated Src gives predominantly Y341 phosphorylation. Phosphorylation at both sites is maximal only when both oncogenic Ras and activated Src are present. Raf-1 that cannot interact with Ras-GTP is not phosphorylated, showing that phosphorylation is Ras dependent, presumably occurring at the plasma membrane. Mutations which prevent phosphorylation at either site block Raf-1 activation and maximal activity is seen only when both are phosphorylated. Mutations at S339 or Y340 do not block Raf-1 activation. While B-Raf lacks a tyrosine phosphorylation site equivalent to Y341 of Raf-1, S445 of B-Raf is equivalent to S338 of Raf-1. Phosphorylation of S445 is constitutive and is not stimulated by oncogenic Ras. However, S445 phosphorylation still contributes to B-Raf activation by elevating basal and consequently Ras-stimulated activity. Thus, there are considerable differences between the activation of the Raf proteins; Ras-GTP mediates two phosphorylation events required for Raf-1 activation but does not regulate such events for B-Raf.     

Positive and negative regulation of Raf kinase activity and function by phosphorylation.

Activating and inhibitory phosphorylation mechanisms play an essential role in regulating Raf kinase activity. Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of C-Raf in the kinase activation loop (residues T491 and S494) is necessary, but not sufficient, for activation. C-Raf has additional activating phosphorylation sites at S338 and Y341. Mutating all four of these residues to acidic residues, S338D/Y341D/T491E/S494D (DDED), in C-Raf results in constitutive activity. However, acidic residue substitutions at the corresponding activation loop sites in B-Raf are sufficient to confer constitutive activity. B-Raf and C-Raf also utilize similar inhibitory phosphorylation mechanisms to regulate kinase activity. B-Raf has multiple inhibitory phosphorylation sites necessary for full kinase inhibition where C-Raf requires only one. We examined the functional significance of these inhibitory and activating phosphorylations in Caenorhabditis elegans lin-45 Raf. Eliminating the inhibitory phosphorylation or mimicking activating phosphorylation sites is sufficient to confer constitutive activity upon lin-45 Raf and induce multi-vulva phenotypes in C.elegans. Our results demonstrate that different members of the Raf family kinases have both common and distinct phosphorylation mechanisms to regulate kinase activity and biological function.     

Phosphorylation of Raf-1 serine 338-serine 339 is an essential regulatory event for Ras-dependent activation and biological signaling.

Activation of the Raf serine/threonine protein kinases is tightly regulated by multiple phosphorylation events. Phosphorylation of either tyrosine 340 or 341 in the catalytic domain of Raf-1 has been previously shown to induce the ability of the protein kinase to phosphorylate MEK. By using a combination of mitogenic and enzymatic assays, we found that phosphorylation of the adjacent residue, serine 338, and, to a lesser extent, serine 339 is essential for the biological and enzymatic activities of Raf-1. Replacement of S338 with alanine blocked the ability of prenylated Raf-CX to transform Rat-1 fibroblasts. Similarly, the loss of S338-S339 in Raf-1 prevented protein kinase activation in COS-7 cells by either oncogenic Ras[V12] or v-Src. Consistent with phosphorylation of S338-S339, acidic amino acid substitutions of these residues partially restored transforming activity to Raf-CX, as well as kinase activation of Raf-1 by Ras[V12] or v-Src. Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of wild-type Raf-CX and Raf-CX[A338A339] confirmed the presence of a phosphoserine-containing peptide with the predicted mobility in the wild-type protein which was absent from the mutant. This peptide could be quantitatively precipitated by an antipeptide antibody specific for the 18-residue tryptic peptide containing S338-S339 and was demonstrated to contain only phosphoserine. Phosphorylation of this peptide in Raf-1 was significantly increased by coexpression with Ras[V12]. These data demonstrate that Raf-1 residues 338 to 341 constitute a unique phosphoregulatory site in which the phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues contributes to the regulation of Raf by Ras, Src, and Ras-independent membrane localization.     

Membrane localization of Raf assists engagement of downstream effectors

We have previously described a small molecule-directed protein dimerization strategy, using coumermycin to juxtapose Raf fusion proteins containing the coumermycin-binding domain GyrB. Oligomerization of cytoplasmically localized Raf-GyrB fusion proteins leads to an increase in the kinase activity of both Raf and its substrate Mek. Surprisingly, more distal targets, such as Erk1 and Erk2, are not activated using this approach. Here we report that coumermycin-induced oligomerization of a membrane-localized Raf-GyrB fusion protein potently activated Erk1 and Erk2, up-regulated Fos protein levels, and induced expression of many immediate-early response genes. Thus, both membrane localization and oligomerization of Raf-GyrB are required to target Raf signals to downstream effectors. The ability to activate the entire Raf signal transduction cascade conditionally, using coumermycin-induced oligomerization, should prove useful for dissecting Raf-mediated effects on gene expression and cellular differentiation.     

Phosphorylation of 338SSYY341 regulates specific interaction between Raf-1 and MEK1

The present study characterizes the interaction between the Raf-1 kinase domain and MEK1 and examines whether the magnitude of their interaction correlates to the ability of Raf to phosphorylate MEK1. Here we show that the minimal domain required for the Raf kinase activity starts from tryptophan 342. Maximal binding of the Raf kinase domain to MEK1 and its kinase activity are achieved upon phosphorylation of the region (338)SSYY(341) in response to 4beta-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), or mutation of Y340Y341 to aspartic acids. Conversely, the TPA-stimulated MEK binding and kinase activity are diminished when this region is deleted or Ser(338) and Ser(339) are mutated to alanines. We also show that the integrity of the Raf ATP-binding site is necessary for the interaction between Raf-1 and MEK1. Furthermore, two MEK-binding sites are identified; the first is localized between amino acids 325 and 349, and the second is within the region between amino acids 350 and 648. Separately, the binding of each site to MEK1 is weak, but in a cis context, they give rise to a much stronger association, which can be further stimulated by TPA. Finally, we find that tryptophan 342, which is conserved among the Raf family and other protein kinases, is essential for the Ser(338) phosphorylation of the full-length Raf and its binding to MEK1. Taken together, our results indicate that the phosphorylation of Ser(338) and Tyr(341) on Raf exerts an important effect on reconfiguring the two MEK-binding sites. As a result, these two sites coordinate to form a high affinity MEK-binding epitope, leading to a marked increase in Raf kinase activity.     

Microtubule integrity regulates Pak leading to Ras-independent activation of Raf-1. insights into mechanisms of Raf-1 activation

Growth factors activate Raf-1 by engaging a complex program, which requires Ras binding, membrane recruitment, and phosphorylation of Raf-1. The present study employs the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole as an alternative approach to explore the mechanisms of Raf activation. Incubation of cells with nocodazole leads to activation of Pak1/2, kinases downstream of small GTPases Rac/Cdc42, which have been previously indicated to phosphorylate Raf-1 Ser(338). Nocodazole-induced stimulation of Raf-1 is augmented by co-expression of small GTPases Rac/Cdc42 and Pak1/2. Dominant negative mutants of these proteins block activation of Raf-1 by nocodazole, but not by epidermal growth factor (EGF). Thus, our studies define Rac/Cdc42/Pak as a module upstream of Raf-1 during its activation by microtubule disruption. Although it is Ras-independent, nocodazole-induced activation of Raf-1 appears to involve the amino-terminal regulatory region in which the integrity of the Ras binding domain is required. Surprisingly, the Raf zinc finger mutation (C165S/C168S) causes a robust activation of Raf-1 by nocodazole, whereas it diminishes Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1. We also show that mutation of residues Ser(338) to Ala or Tyr(340)-Tyr(341) to Phe-Phe immediately amino-terminal to the catalytic domain abrogates activation of both the wild type and zinc finger mutant Raf by both EGF/4beta-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate and nocodazole. Finally, an in vitro kinase assay demonstrates that the zinc finger mutant serves as a better substrate of Pak1 than the wild type Raf-1. Collectively, our results indicate that 1) the zinc finger exerts an inhibitory effect on Raf-1 activation, probably by preventing phosphorylation of (338)SSYY(341); 2) such inhibition is first overcome by an unknown factor binding in place of Ras-GTP to the amino-terminal regulatory region in response to nocodazole; and 3) EGF and nocodazole utilize different kinases to phosphorylate Ser(338), an event crucial for Raf activation.     

S338 phosphorylation of Raf-1 is independent of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Pak3

The Raf-1 serine/threonine protein kinase requires phosphorylation of the serine at position 338 (S338) for activation. Ras is required to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, which is where S338 phosphorylation occurs. The recent suggestion that Pak3 could stimulate Raf-1 activity by directly phosphorylating S338 through a Ras/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Pl3-K)/-Cdc42-dependent pathway has attracted much attention. Using a phospho-specific antibody to S338, we have reexamined this model. Using LY294002 and wortmannin, inhibitors of Pl3-K, we find that growth factor-mediated S338 phosphorylation still occurs, even when Pl3-K activity is completely blocked. Although high concentrations of LY294002 and wortmannin did suppress S338 phosphorylation, they also suppressed Ras activation. Additionally, we show that Pak3 is not activated under conditions where S338 is phosphorylated, but when Pak3 is strongly activated, by coexpression with V12Cdc42 or by mutations that make it independent of Cdc42, it did stimulate S338 phosphorylation. However, this occurred in the cytosol and did not stimulate Raf-1 kinase activity. The inability of Pak3 to activate Raf-1 was not due to an inability to stimulate phosphorylation of the tyrosine at position 341 but may be due to its inability to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane. Taken together, our data show that growth factor-stimulated Raf-1 activity is independent of Pl3-K activity and argue against Pak3 being a physiological mediator of S338 phosphorylation in growth factor-stimulated cells.     

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulates Raf1 through Pak phosphorylation of serine 338

We have previously shown that inhibition of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase severely attenuates the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) following engagement of integrin/fibronectin receptors and that Raf is the critical target of PI 3-kinase regulation [1]. To investigate how PI 3-kinase regulates Raf, we examined sites on Raf1 required for regulation by PI 3-kinase and explored the mechanisms involved in this regulation. Serine 338 (Ser338), which was critical for fibronectin stimulation of Raf1, was phosphorylated in a PI 3-kinase-dependent manner following engagement of fibronectin receptors. In addition, fibronectin activation of a Raf1 mutant containing a phospho-mimic mutation (S338D) was independent of PI 3-kinase. Furthermore, integrin-induced activation of the serine/threonine kinase Pak-1, which has been shown to phosphorylate Raf1 Ser338, was also dependent on PI 3-kinase activity and expression of a kinase-inactive Pak-1 mutant blocked phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338. These results indicate that PI 3-kinase regulates phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338 through the serine/threonine kinase Pak. Thus, phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338 through PI 3-kinase and Pak provides a co-stimulatory signal which together with Ras leads to strong activation of Raf1 kinase activity by integrins.     

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) phosphorylates Raf-1 at serine 338 and mediates Ras-stimulated Raf-1 activation

The calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) participates with Ras to Raf-1 activation, and it is necessary for activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) by different factors in epithelial and mesenchimal cells. Raf-1 activation is a complex multistep process, and its maximal activation is achieved by phosphorylation at Y341 by Src and at S338 by other kinase/s. Although early data proposed the involvement of p21-activated kinase 3 (Pak3), the kinase phosphorylating S338 remains to be definitively identified. In this study, we verified the hypothesis that CaMKII phosphorylates Raf-1 at Ser338. To do so, we determined the role of CaMKII in Raf-1 and ERK activation by oncogenic Ras and other factors. Serum, fibronectin, Src^Y527 and Ras^V12 activated CaMKII and ERK, at different extents. The inhibition of CaMKII attenuated Raf-1 and ERK activation by all these factors. CaMKII was also necessary for the phosphorylation of Raf-1 at S338 by serum, fibronectin and Ras. Conversely, inhibition of Pak3 activation by blocking phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase was ineffective. The direct phosphorylation of S338 Raf-1 by CaMKII was demonstrated in vitro by interaction of purified kinases. These results demonstrate that Ras activates CaMKII, which, in turn, phosphorylates Raf-1 at S338 and participates in ERK activation upon different stimuli.     

Dynamic changes in C-Raf phosphorylation and 14-3-3 protein binding in response to growth factor stimulation: differential roles of 14-3-3 protein binding sites

Phosphorylation events play a crucial role in Raf activation. Phosphorylation of serines 259 and 621 in C-Raf and serines 364 and 728 in B-Raf has been suggested to be critical for association with 14-3-3 proteins. To study the functional consequences of Raf phosphorylations at these positions, we developed and characterized phosphospecific antibodies directed against 14-3-3 binding epitopes: a monoclonal phosphospecific antibody (6B4) directed against pS621 and a polyclonal antibody specific for B-Raf-pS364 epitope. Although 6B4 detected both C- and B-Raf in Western blots, it specifically recognizes the native form of C-Raf but not B-Raf. Contrary to B-Raf, a kinase-dead mutant of C-Raf was found to be only poorly phosphorylated in the Ser-621 position. Moreover, serine 259 to alanine mutation prevented the Ser-621 phosphorylation suggesting an interdependence between these two 14-3-3 binding domains. Direct C-Raf.14-3-3 binding studies with purified proteins combined with competition assays revealed that the 14-3-3 binding domain surrounding pS621 represents the high affinity binding site, whereas the pS259 epitope mediates lower affinity binding. Raf isozymes differ in their 14-3-3 association rates. The time course of endogenous C-Raf activation in mammalian cells by nerve growth factor (NGF) has been examined using both phosphospecific antibodies directed against 14-3-3 binding sites (6B4 and anti-pS259) as well as phosphospecific antibodies directed against the activation domain (anti-pS338 and anti-pY340/pY341). Time course of Ser-621 phosphorylation, in contrast to Ser-259 phosphorylation, exhibited unexpected pattern reaching maximal phosphorylation within 30 s of NGF stimulation. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 340/341 reached maximal levels subsequent to Ser-621 phosphorylation and was coincident with emergence of kinase activity. Taken together, we found substantial differences between C-Raf.14-3-3 binding epitopes pS259 and pS621 and visualized for the first time the sequence of the essential C-Raf phosphorylation events in mammalian cells in response to growth factor stimulation.     

Characterization of Ser338 phosphorylation for Raf-1 activation

Raf kinases are essential for regulating cell proliferation, survival, and tumorigenesis. However, the mechanisms by which Raf is activated are still incompletely understood. Phosphorylation plays a critical role in Raf activation in response to mitogens. The present study characterizes phosphorylation of Ser338, a crucial event for Raf-1 activation. Here we report that mutation of Lys375 to Met diminishes phosphorylation of Ser338 on both wild type Raf-1 in cells treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) or 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and a constitutively active mutant in which Tyr340/Tyr341 are replaced by 2 aspartic acids, a conserved substitution present in natural B-Raf. The loss of Ser338 phosphorylation in these Raf mutants is not engendered by a mutation-induced conformational change, inasmuch as mutation of another site (Ser471 to Ala) in the activation segment also abolishes Ser338 phosphorylation, whereas both the kinase-dead mutants of Raf-1 are phosphorylated well by active Pak1. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of Ser338 is inhibited by Sorafenib, a Raf kinase inhibitor, but not by the MEK inhibitor U0126. Interestingly, a kinase-dead mutation and Sorafenib also markedly reduce phosphorylation of Ser445 on B-Raf, a site equivalent to Raf-1 Ser338. Finally, our data reveal that Ser338 is phosphorylated on inactive Raf-1 by an active mutant of Raf-1 when they are dimerized in cells and that artificial dimerization of Raf-1 causes Ser338 phosphorylation, accompanied by activation of ERK1/2. Altogether, our data suggest that Ser338 on Raf-1 is autophosphorylated in response to mitogens.     

p21-Activated Kinase 1 (PAK1) Can Promote ERK Activation in a Kinase-independent Manner

PAK1 plays an important role in proliferation and tumorigenesis, at least partially by promoting ERK phosphorylation of C-RAF (Ser-338) or MEK1 (Ser-298). We observed how that overexpression of a kinase-dead mutant form of PAK1 increased phosphorylation of MEK1/2 (Ser-217/Ser-221) and ERK (Thr-202/Tyr-204), although phosphorylation of B-RAF (Ser-445) and C-RAF (Ser-338) remained unchanged. Furthermore, increased activation of the PAK1 activator Rac1 induced the formation of a triple complex of Rac1, PAK1, and MEK1 independent of the kinase activity of PAK1. These data suggest that PAK1 can stimulate MEK activity in a kinase-independent manner, probably by serving as a scaffold to facilitate interaction of C-RAF.     

Role of angiotensin II type 1A receptor phosphorylation, phospholipase D, and extracellular calcium in isoform-specific protein kinase C membrane translocation responses

The angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT(1A)R) plays an important role in cardiovascular function and as such represents a primary target for therapeutic intervention. The AT(1A)R is coupled via G(q) to the activation of phospholipase C, the hydrolysis of phosphoinositides, release of calcium from intracellular stores, and the activation of protein kinase C (PKC). We show here that PKCbetaI and PKCbetaII exhibit different membrane translocation patterns in response to AT(1A)R agonist activation. Whereas PKCbetaII translocation to the membrane is transient, PKCbetaI displays additional translocation responses: persistent membrane localization and oscillations between the membrane and cytosol following agonist removal. The initial translocation of PKCbetaI requires the release of calcium from intracellular stores and the activation of phospholipase C, but persistent membrane localization is dependent upon extracellular calcium influx. The mutation of any of the three PKC phosphorylation consensus sites (Ser-331, Ser-338, and Ser-348) localized within the AT(1A)R C-tail significantly increases the probability that persistent increases in diacylglycerol levels and PKCbetaI translocation responses will be observed. The persistent increase in AT(1A)R-mediated diacylglycerol formation is mediated by the activation of phospholipase D. Although the persistent PKCbetaI membrane translocation response is absolutely dependent upon the PKC activity-dependent recruitment of an extracellular calcium current, it does not require the activation of phospholipase D. Taken together, we show that the patterning of AT(1A)R second messenger response patterns is regulated by heterologous desensitization and PKC isoform substrate specificity.     

Macrophage proliferation is regulated through CSF-1 receptor tyrosines 544, 559, and 807

Colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1)-stimulated CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) tyrosine phosphorylation initiates survival, proliferation, and differentiation signaling pathways in macrophages. Either activation loop Y807F or juxtamembrane domain (JMD) Y559F mutations severely compromise CSF-1-regulated proliferation and differentiation. YEF, a CSF-1R in which all eight tyrosines phosphorylated in the activated receptor were mutated to phenylalanine, lacks in vitro kinase activity and in vivo CSF-1-regulated tyrosine phosphorylation. The addition of Tyr-807 alone to the YEF backbone (Y807AB) led to CSF-1-independent but receptor kinase-dependent proliferation, without detectable activation loop Tyr-807 phosphorylation. The addition of Tyr-559 alone (Y559AB) supported a low level of CSF-1-independent proliferation that was slightly enhanced by CSF-1, indicating that Tyr-559 has a positive Tyr-807-independent effect. Consistent with the postulated autoinhibitory role of the JMD Tyr-559 and its relief by ligand-induced Tyr-559 phosphorylation, the addition of Tyr-559 to the Y807AB background suppressed proliferation in the absence of CSF-1, but restored most of the CSF-1-stimulated proliferation. Full restoration of kinase activation and proliferation required the additional add back of JMD Tyr-544. Inhibitor experiments indicate that the constitutive proliferation of Y807AB macrophages is mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and ERK1/2 pathways, whereas proliferation of WT and Y559,807AB macrophages is, in addition, contributed to by Src family kinase (SFK)-dependent pathways. Thus Tyr-807 confers sufficient kinase activity for strong CSF-1-independent proliferation, whereas Tyr-559 maintains the receptor in an inactive state. Tyr-559 phosphorylation releases this restraint and may also contribute to the CSF-1-regulated proliferative response by activating Src family kinase.     

FAK phosphorylation at Ser-843 inhibits Tyr-397 phosphorylation, cell spreading and migration

Multiple stimuli promote the tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which ultimately facilitates migration. Little is known about the effect of adhesion-dependent signals and cytoskeleton organization on the regulation of FAK phosphorylation at serine sites, or about the role of FAK serine phosphorylation in cell migration. Here, we show that FAK phosphorylation at Ser-843 is strikingly increased when adherent cells are removed from the substratum and held in suspension or by treatment of adherent cells with cytochalasin D, conditions that disrupt the F-actin cytoskeleton and promote focal adhesion disassembly. Notably, the increase in Ser-843 phosphorylation was accompanied by a concomitant sharp decrease in Tyr-397 phosphorylation. To further examine the cause-effect relationship between these two phosphorylation sites we generated Ser-843 phosphorylation-deficient and phosphorylation-mimicking FAK mutants. We found that mutation of Ser-843 to aspartic acid (FAK[S843D]) markedly decreased FAK Tyr-397 phosphorylation in integrin-stimulated cells. While the migratory defect of FAK-deficient fibroblasts was rescued by stable re-expression of WT FAK or FAK[S843A], stable re-expression of FAK[S843D] failed to restore the ability of the cells to migrate into the denuded area of a wound. Our results indicate that increased FAK phosphorylation at Ser-843 represses FAK phosphorylation at Tyr-397, thus suggesting a mechanism of cross-talk between these phosphorylation sites that could regulate FAK-mediated cell shape and migration.     

PYK2 autophosphorylation,but not kinase activity,is necessary for adhesion-induced association with c-Src,osteoclast spreading,and bone resorption

Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) is the main adhesion-induced kinase in bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Previous studies have shown that ligation of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin in osteoclasts induces c-Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation and PYK2 activation, leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, migration, and polarization of these cells. In this study, we examined the role of PYK2 kinase activity and its major autophosphorylation site in adhesion-dependent signaling and cytoskeletal organization during osteoclast spreading and migration. By infecting pre-fusion osteoclasts using recombinant adenovirus expressing PYK2 and its mutants, we demonstrated that mutation at the autophosphorylation site (Y402F) abolishes PYK2 association with c-Src and reduces significantly phosphorylation at tyrosines 579/580 and 881 resulting in inhibition of osteoclast spreading and bone resorption. Overexpression of the kinase-dead PYK2(K475A) mutant had no effect on cell spreading, interaction with c-Src, or the phosphorylation level of Tyr-402, Tyr-579/580, and Tyr-881 relative to PYK2(wt)-expressing cells. Taken together these findings suggest that Tyr-402 is the major docking site for c-Src and can be phosphorylated by another tyrosine kinase in osteoclasts but not in HEK293 cells. Interestingly, both PYK2(Y402F) and PYK2(K457A) translocate normally to podosomes and have no effect on macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced osteoclast migration. Whereas PYK2(Y402F) dominant negatively blocks osteoclast spreading and bone resorption, PYK2(K457A) may function in part as an adaptor by initially recruiting c-Src to the adhesion complex, which appears to activate PYK2 by phosphorylating additional tyrosines in its regulatory and C-terminal domains. We thus concluded that phosphorylation at Tyr-402 in PYK2 is essential in the regulation of adhesion-dependent cytoskeletal organization in osteoclasts.     

Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for activation by tyrosine phosphorylation.

A central feature of signal transduction downstream of both receptor and oncogenic tyrosine kinases is the Ras-dependent activation of a protein kinase cascade consisting of Raf-1, Mek (MAP kinase kinase) and ERKs (MAP kinases). To study the role of tyrosine kinase activity in the activation of Raf-1, we have examined the properties of p74Raf-1 and oncogenic Src that are necessary for activation of p74Raf-1. We show that in mammalian cells activation of p74Raf-1 by oncogenic Src requires pp60Src to be myristoylated and the ability of p74Raf-1 to interact with p21Ras-GTP. The Ras/Raf interaction is required for p21Ras-GTP to bring p74Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for phosphorylation at tyrosine 340 or 341, probably by membrane-bound pp60Src. When oncogenic Src is expressed with Raf-1, p74Raf-1 is activated 5-fold; however, when co-expressed with oncogenic Ras and Src, Raf-1 is activated 25-fold and this is associated with a further 3-fold increase in tyrosine phosphorylation. Thus, p21Ras-GTP is the limiting component in bringing p74Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for tyrosine phosphorylation. Using mutants of Raf-1 at Tyr340/341, we show that in addition to tyrosine phosphorylation at these sites, there is an additional activation step resulting from p21Ras-GTP recruiting p74Raf-1 to the plasma membrane. Thus, the role of Ras in Raf-1 activation is to bring p74Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for at least two different activation steps.     

Mechanistic roles of Ser-114, Tyr-155, and Lys-159 in 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl reductase from Comamonas testosteroni

3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl reductase (3alpha-HSD/CR) from Comamonas testosteroni, a short chain dehydrogenase/reductase, catalyzes the oxidation of androsterone with NAD+ to form androstanedione and NADH. A catalytic triad of Ser-114, Tyr-155, and Lys-159 in 3alpha-HSD/CR has been proposed based on structural analysis and sequence alignment of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. The 3alpha-HSD/CR-catalyzed reaction has not been kinetically analyzed in detail, however. In this study, we combined steady-state kinetics, site-directed mutagenesis, and pH profile to explore the function of Ser-114, Tyr-155, and Lys-159 in 3alpha-HSD/CR-catalyzed reaction. The catalytic efficiency of wild-type and mutants S114A, Y155F, K159A, and Y155F/K159A is 4.3 x 10(7), 7.3 x 10(4), 1.7 x 10(4), 2.4 x 10(5), and 71 m(-1)s(-1), respectively. The values of pKa on kcat/Km for the wild-type, S114A, Y155F, K159A, and Y155F/K159A are 7.2, 7.4, 8.4, 9.1, and 10.2, respectively. Mutant S114A/Y155F exhibits a pH-independent profile with 10(-5) times of wild-type activity at pH 10.5. The activity decreases as the pH lowers, which indicates that a functional group with an apparent pKa of 7.2 is involved in the general base catalysis for wild-type 3alpha-HSD/CR. The pKa shift to 9.1 for mutant K159A suggests the role of Lys-159 is to lower the pKa of the residues involved in the general base catalysis. Because pH dependence is observed for both S114A and Y155F mutants and pH independence is observed in S114A/Y155F, Tyr-155 may be important as a general base catalysis in the wild-type, whereas Ser-114 may act as a general base on mutant Y155F to catalyze the reaction.     

SptP,a Salmonella typhimurium type III-secreted protein,inhibits the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by inhibiting Raf activation

Salmonella has developed ways to modulate host cellular response in order to survive. Although the steps required for such modulation have been incompletely characterized, there is increasing evidence for a role for SptP, a type III secretion protein. In part, the actions of SptP are thought to be mediated through its reported inhibition of the extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) MAP kinase pathway. In the present studies, a series of transfections were performed in which various constitutively activated components of the MAP kinase pathway were co-transfected with SptP in order to determine the mechanism by which SptP inhibits this MAP kinase activation. SptP was found to inhibit the activation of ERK stimulated by both a constitutively active form of Ras and a partially activated form of Raf-1 containing a phospho-mimetic mutation (Raf Y340D). In contrast, the activation of ERK by constitutively active forms of MAP kinase kinase (MEK) was not inhibited, suggesting that the actions of SptP were mediated by Raf-1. In order to determine how SptP might interfere with activation of Raf, we utilized a membrane-localized form of Raf. Constitutive membrane-localization of Raf (RafCAAX), resulting in partial activation, did not prevent inhibition by SptP. However, introduction of an additional, partially activating (Y340D) phospho-mimetic mutation, to RafCAAX, dramatically reduced the ability of SptP to inhibit Raf action. Comparison of SptP mutants, lacking either GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity or tyrosine phosphatase activity, further suggested that SptP inhibits both the membrane localization and subsequent phosphorylation required for activation of Raf. Both tyrosine phosphatase activity and GAP activity were responsible for SptP inhibition of Raf(Y340D)-induced ERK activation, but only GAP activity was responsible for inhibition of the membrane localized forms of Raf-1. To assess the biological significance of SptP, we examined tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha induction following Salmonella infection. SptP gene deletion enhanced the capacity of Salmonella to induce TNF-alpha secretion following infection of J774A.1 macrophage cells.