Ubiquitin manipulation by an E2 conjugating enzyme using a novel covalent intermediate

Degradation of misfolded and damaged proteins by the 26 S proteasome requires the substrate to be tagged with a polyubiquitin chain. Assembly of polyubiquitin chains and subsequent substrate labeling potentially involves three enzymes, an E1, E2, and E3. E2 proteins are key enzymes and form a thioester intermediate through their catalytic cysteine with the C-terminal glycine (Gly76) of ubiquitin. This thioester intermediate is easily hydrolyzed in vitro and has eluded structural characterization. To overcome this, we have engineered a novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide-linked complex by mutating Gly76 to Cys76 in ubiquitin. Reaction of Ubc1, an E2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with this mutant ubiquitin resulted in an ubiquitin-E2 disulfide that could be purified and was stable for several weeks. Chemical shift perturbation analysis of the disulfide ubiquitin-Ubc1 complex by NMR spectroscopy reveals an ubiquitin-Ubc1 interface similar to that for the ubiquitin-E2 thioester. In addition to the typical E2 catalytic domain, Ubc1 contains an ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, and we have utilized NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that in this disulfide complex the UBA domain is freely accessible to non-covalently bind a second molecule of ubiquitin. The ability of the Ubc1 to bind two ubiquitin molecules suggests that the UBA domain does not interact with the thioester-bound ubiquitin during polyubiquitin chain formation. Thus, construction of this novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide provides a method to characterize structurally the first step in polyubiquitin chain assembly by Ubc1 and its related class II enzymes.     

The HIP2~Ubiquitin Conjugate Forms a Non-Compact Monomeric Thioester during Di-Ubiquitin Synthesis

Polyubiquitination is a post-translational event used to control the degradation of damaged or unwanted proteins by modifying the target protein with a chain of ubiquitin molecules. One potential mechanism for the assembly of polyubiquitin chains involves the dimerization of an E2 conjugating enzyme allowing conjugated ubiquitin molecules to be put into close proximity to assist reactivity. HIP2 (UBE2K) and Ubc1 (yeast homolog of UBE2K) are unique E2 conjugating enzymes that each contain a C-terminal UBA domain attached to their catalytic domains, and they have basal E3-independent polyubiquitination activity. Although the isolated enzymes are monomeric, polyubiquitin formation activity assays show that both can act as ubiquitin donors or ubiquitin acceptors when in the activated thioester conjugate suggesting dimerization of the E2-ubiquitin conjugates. Stable disulfide complexes, analytical ultracentrifugation and small angle x-ray scattering were used to show that the HIP2-Ub and Ubc1-Ub thioester complexes remain predominantly monomeric in solution. Models of the HIP2-Ub complex derived from SAXS data show the complex is not compact but instead forms an open or backbent conformation similar to UbcH5b~Ub or Ubc13~Ub where the UBA domain and covalently attached ubiquitin reside on opposite ends of the catalytic domain. Activity assays showed that full length HIP2 exhibited a five-fold increase in the formation rate of di-ubiquitin compared to a HIP2 lacking the UBA domain. This difference was not observed for Ubc1 and may be attributed to the closer proximity of the UBA domain in HIP2 to the catalytic core than for Ubc1.     

The UBA domain of conjugating enzyme Ubc1/Ube2K facilitates assembly of K48/K63‐branched ubiquitin chains

The assembly of a specific polymeric ubiquitin chain on a target protein is a key event in the regulation of numerous cellular processes. Yet, the mechanisms that govern the selective synthesis of particular polyubiquitin signals remain enigmatic. The homologous ubiquitin‐conjugating (E2) enzymes Ubc1 (budding yeast) and Ube2K (mammals) exclusively generate polyubiquitin linked through lysine 48 (K48). Uniquely among E2 enzymes, Ubc1 and Ube2K harbor a ubiquitin‐binding UBA domain with unknown function. We found that this UBA domain preferentially interacts with ubiquitin chains linked through lysine 63 (K63). Based on structural modeling, in vitro ubiquitination experiments, and NMR studies, we propose that the UBA domain aligns Ubc1 with K63‐linked polyubiquitin and facilitates the selective assembly of K48/K63‐branched ubiquitin conjugates. Genetic and proteomics experiments link the activity of the UBA domain, and hence the formation of this unusual ubiquitin chain topology, to the maintenance of cellular proteostasis.     

Recruitment of Ubiquitin within an E2 Chain Elongation Complex

The ubiquitin (Ub) proteolysis pathway uses an E1, E2, and E3 enzyme cascade to label substrate proteins with ubiquitin and target them for degradation. The mechanisms of ubiquitin chain formation remain unclear and include a sequential addition model, in which polyubiquitin chains are built unit by unit on the substrate, or a preassembly model, in which polyubiquitin chains are preformed on the E2 or E3 enzyme and then transferred in one step to the substrate. The E2 conjugating enzyme UBE2K has a 150-residue catalytic core domain and a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain. Polyubiquitin chains anchored to the catalytic cysteine and free in solution are formed by UBE2K supporting a preassembly model. To study how UBE2K might assemble polyubiquitin chains, we synthesized UBE2K-Ub and UBE2K-Ub₂ covalent complexes and analyzed E2 interactions with the covalently attached Ub and Ub₂ moieties using NMR spectroscopy. The UBE2K-Ub complex exists in multiple conformations, including the catalytically competent closed state independent of the UBA domain. In contrast, the UBE2K-Ub₂ complex takes on a more extended conformation directed by interactions between the classic I44 hydrophobic face of the distal Ub and the conserved MGF hydrophobic patch of the UBA domain. Our results indicate there are distinct differences between the UBE2K-Ub and UBE2K-Ub₂ complexes and show how the UBA domain can alter the position of a polyubiquitin chain attached to the UBE2K active site. These observations provide structural insights into the unique Ub chain-building capacity for UBE2K.     

The E2-25K ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain aids in polyubiquitin chain synthesis and linkage specificity

E2-25K is an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme with the ability to synthesize Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chains. E2-25K and its homologs represent the only known E2 enzymes which contain a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain as well as the conserved catalytic ubiquitin-conjugating (UBC) domain. As an additional non-covalent binding surface for ubiquitin, the UBA domain must provide some functional specialization. We mapped the protein–protein interface involved in the E2-25K UBA/ubiquitin complex by solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and subsequently modeled the structure of the complex. Domain–domain interactions between the E2-25K catalytic UBC domain and the UBA domain do not induce significant structural changes in the UBA domain or alter the affinity of the UBA domain for ubiquitin. We determined that one of the roles of the C-terminal UBA domain, in the context of E2-25K, is to increase processivity in Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chain synthesis, possibly through increased binding to the ubiquitinated substrate. Additionally, we see evidence that the UBA domain directs specificity in polyubiquitin chain linkage.     

Interaction of the tail with the catalytic region of a class II E2 conjugating enzyme

Ubiquitination plays an important role in many biological processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and protein degradation. In the latter pathway the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes or E2 enzymes are important proteins forming a key E2-ubiquitin thiolester prior to substrate labelling. While the structure of the 150-residue catalytic domain has been well characterized, a subset of E2 enzymes (class II) carry a variable length C-terminal `tail' where structural detail is not available. The presence of this C-terminal extension plays an important role in target recognition, ubiquitin chain assembly and oligomerization. In this work NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the secondary structure of the 215-residue yeast E2 protein Ubc1 and the interactions of its C-terminus with the catalytic domain. The C-terminal tail of Ubc1 was found to contain three -helices between residues D169-S176, K183-L193 and N203-L213 providing the first evidence for a well-defined secondary structure in this region. Chemical shift mapping indicated that residues in the L2 loop of the catalytic domain were most affected indicating the C-terminus of Ubc1 likely interacts with this region. This site of interaction is distinct from that observed in the E2-ubiquitin thiolester and may act to protect the catalytic C88 residue and direct the interaction of ubiquitin in the thiolester intermediate.     

Autoregulation of an E2 enzyme by ubiquitin-chain assembly on its catalytic residue

Cells have quality-control mechanisms to recognize non-native protein structures and either help the proteins fold or promote their degradation. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin ligases (E3s) work together to assemble polyubiquitin chains on misfolded or misassembled proteins, which are then degraded by the proteasome. Here, we find that Ubc7, a yeast E2, can itself undergo degradation when its levels exceed that of its binding partner Cue1, a transmembrane protein that tethers Ubc7 to the endoplasmic reticulum. Unassembled, and thus mislocalized, Ubc7 is targeted to the proteasome by Ufd4, a homologous to E6-AP C-terminus (HECT)-class E3. Ubc7 is autoubiquitinated by a novel mechanism wherein the catalytic cysteine, instead of a lysine residue, provides the polyubiquitin chain acceptor site, and this cysteine-linked chain functions as a degradation signal. The polyubiquitin chain can also be transferred to a lysine side chain, suggesting a mechanism for polyubiquitin chain assembly that precedes substrate modification.     

Tripartite Motif Ligases Catalyze Polyubiquitin Chain Formation through a Cooperative Allosteric Mechanism

Ligation of polyubiquitin chains to proteins is a fundamental post-translational modification, often resulting in targeted degradation of conjugated proteins. Attachment of polyubiquitin chains requires the activities of an E1 activating enzyme, an E2 carrier protein, and an E3 ligase. The mechanism by which polyubiquitin chains are formed remains largely speculative, especially for RING-based ligases. The tripartite motif (TRIM) superfamily of ligases functions in many cellular processes including innate immunity, cellular localization, development and differentiation, signaling, and cancer progression. The present results show that TRIM ligases catalyze polyubiquitin chain formation in the absence of substrate, the rates of which can be used as a functional readout of enzyme function. Initial rate studies under biochemically defined conditions show that TRIM32 and TRIM25 are specific for the Ubc5 family of E2-conjugating proteins and, along with TRIM5α, exhibit cooperative kinetics with respect to Ubc5 concentration, with submicromolar [S]_0.5 and Hill coefficients of 3–5, suggesting they possess multiple binding sites for their cognate E2-ubiquitin thioester. Mutation studies reveal a second, non-canonical binding site encompassing the C-terminal Ubc5α-helix. Polyubiquitin chain formation requires TRIM subunit oligomerization through the conserved coiled-coil domain, but can be partially replaced by fusing the catalytic domain to GST to promote dimerization. Other results suggest that TRIM32 assembles polyubiquitin chains as a Ubc5-linked thioester intermediate. These results represent the first detailed mechanistic study of TRIM ligase activity and provide a functional context for oligomerization observed in the superfamily.     

Solution structure of a CUE-ubiquitin complex reveals a conserved mode of ubiquitin binding

Monoubiquitination serves as a regulatory signal in a variety of cellular processes. Monoubiquitin signals are transmitted by binding to a small but rapidly expanding class of ubiquitin binding motifs. Several of these motifs, including the CUE domain, also promote intramolecular monoubiquitination. The solution structure of a CUE domain of the yeast Cue2 protein in complex with ubiquitin reveals intermolecular interactions involving conserved hydrophobic surfaces, including the Leu8-Ile44-Val70 patch on ubiquitin. The contact surface extends beyond this patch and encompasses Lys48, a site of polyubiquitin chain formation. This suggests an occlusion mechanism for inhibiting polyubiquitin chain formation during monoubiquitin signaling. The CUE domain shares a similar overall architecture with the UBA domain, which also contains a conserved hydrophobic patch. Comparative modeling suggests that the UBA domain interacts analogously with ubiquitin. The structure of the CUE-ubiquitin complex may thus serve as a paradigm for ubiquitin recognition and signaling by ubiquitin binding proteins.     

Structural Basis for Non-Covalent Interaction Between Ubiquitin and the Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme Variant Human MMS2

Modification of proteins by post-translational covalent attachment of a single, or chain, of ubiquitin molecules serves as a signaling mechanism for a number of regulatory functions in eukaryotic cells. For example, proteins tagged with lysine-63 linked polyubiquitin chains are involved in error-free DNA repair. The catalysis of lysine-63 linked polyubiquitin chains involves the sequential activity of three enzymes (E1, E2, and E3) that ultimately transfer a ubiquitin thiolester intermediate to a protein target. The E2 responsible for catalysis of lysine-63 linked polyubiquitination is a protein heterodimer consisting of a canonical E2 known as Ubc13, and an E2-like protein, or ubiquitin conjugating enzyme variant (UEV), known as Mms2. We have determined the solution structure of the complex formed by human Mms2 and ubiquitin using high resolution, solution state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The structure of the Mms2–Ub complex provides important insights into the molecular basis underlying the catalysis of lysine-63 linked polyubiquitin chains.     

Two different classes of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are required for the mono-ubiquitination of proteins and elongation by polyubiquitin chains with a specific topology

RING (really interesting new gene) and U-box E3 ligases bridge E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and substrates to enable the transfer of ubiquitin to a lysine residue on the substrate or to one of the seven lysine residues of ubiquitin for polyubiquitin chain elongation. Different polyubiquitin chains have different functions. Lys(48)-linked chains target proteins for proteasomal degradation, and Lys(63)-linked chains function in signal transduction, endocytosis and DNA repair. For this reason, chain topology must be tightly controlled. Using the U-box E3 ligase CHIP [C-terminus of the Hsc (heat-shock cognate) 70-interacting protein] and the RING E3 ligase TRAF6 (tumour-necrosis-factor-receptor-associated factor 6) with the E2s Ubc13 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 13)-Uev1a (ubiquitin E2 variant 1a) and UbcH5a, in the present study we demonstrate that Ubc13-Uev1a supports the formation of free Lys(63)-linked polyubiquitin chains not attached to CHIP or TRAF6, whereas UbcH5a catalyses the formation of polyubiquitin chains linked to CHIP and TRAF6 that lack specificity for any lysine residue of ubiquitin. Therefore the abilities of these E2s to ubiquitinate a substrate and to elongate polyubiquitin chains of a specific topology appear to be mutually exclusive. Thus two different classes of E2 may be required to attach a polyubiquitin chain of a particular topology to a substrate: the properties of one E2 are designed to mono-ubiquitinate a substrate with no or little inherent specificity for an acceptor lysine residue, whereas the properties of the second E2 are tailored to the elongation of a polyubiquitin chain using a defined lysine residue of ubiquitin.     

Structural basis for recruitment of Ubc12 by an E2 binding domain in NEDD8's E1

E2 conjugating enzymes play a central role in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like protein (ublp) transfer cascades: the E2 accepts the ublp from the E1 enzyme and then the E2 often interacts with an E3 enzyme to promote ublp transfer to the target. We report here the crystal structure of a complex between the C-terminal domain from NEDD8's heterodimeric E1 (APPBP1-UBA3) and the catalytic core domain of NEDD8's E2 (Ubc12). The structure and associated mutational analyses reveal molecular details of Ubc12 recruitment by NEDD8's E1. Interestingly, the E1's Ubc12 binding domain resembles ubiquitin and recruits Ubc12 in a manner mimicking ubiquitin's interactions with ubiquitin binding domains. Structural comparison with E2-E3 complexes indicates that the E1 and E3 binding sites on Ubc12 may overlap and raises the possibility that crosstalk between E1 and E3 interacting with an E2 could influence the specificity and processivity of ublp transfer.     

Multiple forms of ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 from wheat. Identification of an essential cysteine by in vitro mutagenesis.

Ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1, directs the ATP-dependent formation of a thiol ester linkage between itself and ubiquitin. The energy in this bond is ultimately used to attach ubiquitin to various intracellular proteins. We previously reported the isolation of multiple E1s from wheat and the characterization of a cDNA encoding this protein (UBA1). We now report the derived amino acid sequence of two additional members of this gene family (UBA2 and UBA3). Whereas the amino acid sequence of UBA2 is nearly identical to UBA1, the sequence of UBA3 is significantly different. Nevertheless, the protein encoded by UBA3 catalyzes the ATP-dependent activation of ubiquitin in vitro. Comparison of derived amino acid sequences of genes encoding E1 from plant, yeast, and animal tissues revealed 5 conserved cysteine residues, with one potentially involved in thiol ester bond formation. To identify this essential residue, codons corresponding to each of the 5 cysteines in UBA1 were individually altered using site-directed mutagenesis. The mutagenized enzymes were expressed in Escherichia coli and assayed for their ability to activate ubiquitin. Only substitution of the cysteine at position 626 abolishes E1 activity, suggesting that this residue forms the thiol ester linkage with ubiquitin.     

Crystal Structure of the Human Ubiquitin-activating Enzyme 5 (UBA5) Bound to ATP: MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS INTO A MINIMALISTIC E1 ENZYME*

E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes (UBAs) are large multidomain proteins that catalyze formation of a thioester bond between the terminal carboxylate of a ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like modifier (UBL) and a conserved cysteine in an E2 protein, producing reactive ubiquityl units for subsequent ligation to substrate lysines. Two important E1 reaction intermediates have been identified: a ubiquityl-adenylate phosphoester and a ubiquityl-enzyme thioester. However, the mechanism of thioester bond formation and its subsequent transfer to an E2 enzyme remains poorly understood. We have determined the crystal structure of the human UFM1 (ubiquitin-fold modifier 1) E1-activating enzyme UBA5, bound to ATP, revealing a structure that shares similarities with both large canonical E1 enzymes and smaller ancestral E1-like enzymes. In contrast to other E1 active site cysteines, which are in a variably sized domain that is separate and flexible relative to the adenylation domain, the catalytic cysteine of UBA5 (Cys²⁵⁰) is part of the adenylation domain in an α-helical motif. The novel position of the UBA5 catalytic cysteine and conformational changes associated with ATP binding provides insight into the possible mechanisms through which the ubiquityl-enzyme thioester is formed. These studies reveal structural features that further our understanding of the UBA5 enzyme reaction mechanism and provide insight into the evolution of ubiquitin activation.     

Binding of polyubiquitin chains to ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains of HHR23A

Ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains are small protein domains that occur in the context of larger proteins and are likely to function as inter- and intramolecular communication elements in ubiquitin/polyubiquitin signaling. Although monoubiquitin/UBA complexes are well characterized, much less is known about UBA/polyubiquitin complexes, even though polyubiquitin chains are believed to be biologically relevant ligands of many UBA domain proteins. Here, we report the results of a quantitative study of the interaction of K48-linked polyubiquitin chains with UBA domains of the DNA repair/proteolysis protein HHR23A, using surface plasmon resonance and other approaches. We present evidence that the UBL domain of HHR23A negatively regulates polyubiquitin/UBA interactions and identify leucine 8 of ubiquitin as an important determinant of chain recognition. A striking relationship between binding affinity and chain length suggests that maximum affinity is associated with a conformational feature that is fully formed in chains of n = 4-6 and can be recognized by a single UBA domain of HHR23A. Our findings provide new insights into polyubiquitin chain recognition and set the stage for future structural investigations of UBA/polyubiquitin complexes.     

Budding yeast Dsk2 protein forms a homodimer via its C-terminal UBA domain

Budding yeast Dsk2 is a family of UbL-UBA proteins that can interact with both polyubiquitin and the proteasome, and is thereby thought to function as a shuttle protein in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Here we show that Dsk2 can homodimerize via its C-terminal UBA domain in the absence of ubiquitin. Dsk2 mutants defective in the UBA domain do not dimerize and do not bind polyubiquitin. The expression of Dsk2 UBA mutants fails to restore the growth defect caused by DSK2 disruption although that of wild-type Dsk2 can restore the defect. These results suggest that Dsk2 homodimerization via the UBA domain plays a role in regulating polyubiquitin binding in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.     

Chaperoned ubiquitylation--crystal structures of the CHIP U box E3 ubiquitin ligase and a CHIP-Ubc13-Uev1a complex

CHIP is a dimeric U box E3 ubiquitin ligase that binds Hsp90 and/or Hsp70 via its TPR-domain, facilitating ubiquitylation of chaperone bound client proteins. We have determined the crystal structure of CHIP bound to an Hsp90 C-terminal decapeptide. The structure explains how CHIP associates with either chaperone type and reveals an unusual asymmetric homodimer in which the protomers adopt radically different conformations. Additionally, we identified CHIP as a functional partner of Ubc13-Uev1a in formation of Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains, extending CHIP's roles into ubiquitin regulation as well as targeted destruction. The structure of Ubc13-Uev1a bound to the CHIP U box domain defines the basis for selective cooperation of CHIP with specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Remarkably, the asymmetric arrangement of the TPR domains in the CHIP dimer occludes one Ubc binding site, so that CHIP operates with half-of-sites activity, providing an elegant means for coupling a dimeric chaperone to a single ubiquitylation system.     

Diverse polyubiquitin interaction properties of ubiquitin-associated domains

The ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain occurs frequently in proteins involved in ubiquitin-dependent signaling pathways. Although polyubiquitin chain binding is considered to be a defining feature of the UBA domain family, the generality of this property has not been established. Here we have surveyed the polyubiquitin interaction properties of 30 UBA domains, including 16 of 17 occurrences in budding yeast. The UBA domains sort into four classes that include linkage-selective polyubiquitin binders and domains that bind different chains (and monoubiquitin) in a nondiscriminatory manner; one notable class ( approximately 30%) did not bind any ubiquitin ligand surveyed. The properties of a given UBA domain are conserved from yeast to mammals. Their functional relevance is further suggested by the ability of an ectopic UBA domain to alter the specificity of a deubiquitylating enzyme in a predictable manner. Conversely, non-UBA sequences can modulate the interaction properties of a UBA domain.     

Ubiquitin binding site of the ubiquitin E2 variant (UEV) protein Mms2 is required for DNA damage tolerance in the yeast RAD6 pathway

Different ubiquitin modifications to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) signal distinct modes of lesion bypass in the RAD6 pathway of DNA damage tolerance. The modification of PCNA with monoubiquitin signals an error-prone bypass, whereas the extension of this modification into a Lys-63-linked polyubiquitin chain promotes error-free bypass. Chain formation is catalyzed by the Mms2/Ubc13 conjugating enzyme variant/conjugating enzyme (UEV.E2) complex together with the Rad5 ubiquitin ligase. In vitro studies of this UEV.E2 complex have identified a ubiquitin binding site that is mainly localized on Mms2. However, the role of this site in DNA damage tolerance and the molecular features of the ubiquitin/Mms2 interaction are poorly understood. Here we identify two molecular determinants, the side chains of Mms2-Ile-57 and ubiquitin-Ile-44, that are required for chain assembly in vitro and error-free lesion bypass in vivo. Mutating either of these side chains to alanine elicits a severe 10-20-fold inhibition of chain synthesis that is caused by compromised binding of the acceptor ubiquitin to Mms2. These results suggest that the ubiquitin binding site of Mms2 is necessary for error-free lesion bypass in the RAD6 pathway and provide new insights into ubiquitin recognition by UEV proteins.     

Lysine activation and functional analysis of E2-mediated conjugation in the SUMO pathway

E2 conjugating proteins that transfer ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers to substrate lysine residues must first activate the lysine nucleophile for conjugation. Genetic complementation revealed three side chains of the E2 Ubc9 that were crucial for normal growth. Kinetic analysis revealed modest binding defects but substantially lowered catalytic rates for these mutant alleles with respect to wild-type Ubc9. X-ray structures for wild-type and mutant human Ubc9-RanGAP1 complexes showed partial loss of contacts to the substrate lysine in mutant complexes. Computational analysis predicted pK perturbations for the substrate lysine, and Ubc9 mutations weakened pK suppression through improper side chain coordination. Biochemical studies with p53, RanGAP1 and the Nup358/RanBP2 E3 were used to determine rate constants and pK values, confirming both structural and computational predictions. It seems that Ubc9 uses an indirect mechanism to activate lysine for conjugation that may be conserved among E2 family members.