The immunological synapse: the more you look the less you know..

Before T cells of the immune system can recognize pathogens, antigen presenting cells (APCs) must process pathogen-derived peptides and present them together with major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHC) to T lymphocytes. T lymphocytes then scan the surface of APCs and antigen-specific activation of the T cell will happen after interaction of T cell antigen receptor (TCR) with MHC-peptide complexes expressed at the membrane of APCs. This interaction takes place in a nanometer scale gap between the two cells, referred to as an immunological synapse. Recent three-dimensional fluorescence analysis of this synapse revealed a dynamic spatial organization of membrane receptors, cytoskeleton and intracellular signaling complexes on the T cell side showing specific patterns, which depend on the nature of the T cell:APC pair. Although it is obvious that establishment of an intimate contact between T cells and APCs will facilitate cell:cell communication it is not clear what is the role, if any, of this receptors patterning. This molecular reorganization has long been thought to enhance and/or sustain TCR signaling and thus T cell activation, but this is now a matter of controversy. Moreover, mechanisms controlling immunological synapse formation are still unraveled. Segregation of proteins may occur spontaneously as proposed by mathematical modeling taking into account membrane fluidity, protein size and receptor/ligand affinity. Alternatively patterning of the molecules at the cell:cell interface could be driven by active processes involving T cell signaling and/or specific features of the APC. These different questions will be discussed herein.     

The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology

Aim  We argue that 'propagule pressure', a key term in invasion biology, has been attributed at least three distinct definitions (with usage of a related term causing additional confusion). All of the definitions refer to fundamental concepts within the invasion process, with the result that the distinct importance of these different concepts has been at best diluted, and at worst lost.
Location  Global.
Methods  We reviewed pertinent literature on propagule pressure to resolve confusion about different uses of the term 'propagule pressure' and we introduced a new term for one variant, colonization pressure. We conducted a computer simulation whereby the introduction of species is represented as a simple sampling process to elucidate the relationship between propagule and colonization pressure.
Results  We defined colonization pressure as the number of species introduced or released to a single location, some of which will go on to establish a self-sustaining population and some of which will not. We subsequently argued that colonization pressure should serve as a null hypothesis for understanding temporal or spatial differences in exotic species richness, as the more species that are introduced, the more we should expect to establish. Finally, using a simple simulation, we showed that propagule pressure is related to colonization pressure, but in a non-linear manner.
Main conclusion  We suggest that the nature of the relationship between propagule pressure and colonization pressure, as well as the efficacy of various proxy measures of each, require more detailed exploration if invasion ecology is to continue to develop into a more predictive science.     

The more you see: spectroscopy in molecular biophysics

Publisher's Note

The more you see: spectroscopy in molecular biophysics     

Much more than you expected: The non-DHFR-mediated effects of methotrexate

BackgroundFor decades, methotrexate (MTX; amethopterin) has been known as an antifolate inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and it is widely used for the treatment of various malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Although the inclusion of MTX in various therapeutic regimens is based on its ability to inhibit DHFR and consequently to suppress the synthesis of pyrimidine and purine precursors, recent studies have shown that MTX is also able to target other intracellular pathways that are independent of folate metabolism.Scope of reviewThe main aim of this review is to summarize the most important, up-to-date findings of studies regarding the non-DHFR-mediated mechanisms of MTX action.Major conclusionsThe effectiveness of MTX is undoubtedly caused by its capability to affect various intracellular pathways at many levels. Although the most important therapeutic mechanism of MTX is strongly based on the inhibition of DHFR, many other effects of this compound have been described and new studies bring new insights into the pharmacology of MTX every year.General significanceIdentification of these new targets for MTX is especially important for a better understanding of MTX action in new protocols of combination therapy.     

Gates,GAVI, the glorious global funds and more: all you ever wanted to know

Global immunization programmes have achieved some remarkable successes. In 1977, Frank Fenner's Commission declared smallpox to have been eradicated by an 11-year-long intensive campaign. The Expanded Programme on Immunization encompassed six important childhood vaccines and reached over three-quarters of the world's children. Polio eradication has gone remarkably well, with only 10 out of 200 countries reporting residual cases. But amidst all the good news, there is also bad news. Coverage is variable; infrastructure is crumbling; and newer vaccines are not being incorporated in many country programmes. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has introduced a new dynamic here. From their initial gift of $100 million in December 1998, their commitment to date is US$1.5 billion - and rising. At the centre is a Global Children's Vaccine Fund which permitted the launch, in January 2000, of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. This is targeted to the 74 poorest countries of the world and is designed to improve vaccination infrastructure, to purchase newer vaccines and to support research and development. Even before we know how successful this programme will be, it has had its imitators. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria borrowed many concepts from GAVI. The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition announced in May 2002 does so as well, and is heavily supported by Gates. Highly effective parasite control programmes antedate all this but will be much strengthened. However, we still face a sizeable budgetary gap both for research and for bringing the best advances to all people who need them.