Heterology tolerance and recognition of mismatched base pairs by human Rad51 protein

Human Rad51 (hRad51) promoted homology recognition and subsequent strand exchange are the key steps in human homologous recombination mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. However, it is still not clear how hRad51 deals with sequence heterology between the two homologous chromosomes in eukaryotic cells, which would lead to mismatched base pairs after strand exchange. Excessive tolerance of sequence heterology may compromise the fidelity of repair of DNA double-strand breaks. In this study, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to monitor the heterology tolerance of human Rad51 mediated strand exchange reactions, in real time, by introducing either G-T or I-C mismatched base pairs between the two homologous DNA strands. The strand exchange reactions were much more sensitive to G-T than to I-C base pairs. These results imply that the recognition of homology and the tolerance of heterology by hRad51 may depend on the local structural motif adopted by the base pairs participating in strand exchange. AnhRad51 mutant protein (hRad51K133R), deficient in ATP hydrolysis, showed greater heterology tolerance to both types of mismatch base pairing, suggesting that ATPase activity may be important for maintenance of high fidelity homologous recombination DNA repair.     

From strand exchange to branch migration; bypassing of non-homologous sequences by human Rad51 and Rad54

Rad51 and Rad54 play crucial roles during homologous recombination. The biochemical activities of human Rad51 (hRad51) and human Rad54 (hRad54) and their interactions with each other are well documented. However, it is not known how these two proteins work together to bypass heterologous sequences; i.e. mismatched base pairs, during homologous recombination. In this study, we used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay to monitor homologous recombination processes in real time so that the interactions between hRad54 and hRad51 during DNA strand exchange and branch migration, which are two core steps of homologous recombination, could be characterized. Our results indicate that hRad54 can facilitate hRad51-promoted strand exchange through various degrees of mismatching. We propose that the main roles of hRad51 in homologous recombination is to initiate the homology recognition and strand-exchange steps and those of hRad54 are to promote efficient branch migration, bypass potential mismatches and facilitate long-range strand exchanges through branch migration of Holliday junctions.     

DNA binding and protein-protein interaction sites in MutS, a mismatched DNA recognition protein from Thermus thermophilus HB8

The mismatch repair system repairs mismatched base pairs, which are caused by either DNA replication errors, DNA damage, or genetic recombination. Mismatch repair begins with the recognition of mismatched base pairs in DNA by MutS. Protein denaturation and limited proteolysis experiments suggest that Thermus thermophilus MutS can be divided into three structural domains as follows: A (N-terminal domain), B (central domain), and C (C-terminal domain) (Tachiki, H., Kato, R., Masui, R., Hasegawa, K., Itakura, H., Fukuyama, K., and Kuramitsu, S. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 4153-4159). To investigate the functions of each domain in detail, truncated genes corresponding to the domains were designed. The gene products were overproduced in Escherichia coli, purified, and assayed for various activities. The MutS-MutS protein interaction site was determined by size-exclusion chromatography to be located in the B domain. The B domain was also found to possess nonspecific double-stranded DNA-binding ability. The C domain, which contains a Walker's A-type nucleotide-binding motif, demonstrated ATPase activity and specific DNA recognition of mismatched base pairs. These ATPase and specific DNA binding activities were found to be dependent upon C domain dimerization.     

Poor base stacking at DNA lesions may initiate recognition by many repair proteins

A fundamental question in DNA repair is how a mismatched or modified base is detected when embedded in millions to billions of normal base pairs. A survey of the literature and structural database reveals a common feature in all repair protein-DNA complexes: the DNA double helix is discontinuous at a lesion site due to base unstacking, kinking and/or nucleotide extrusion. Lesions induce destabilization and distortion of short linear DNAs, and underwinding in negatively supercoiled DNA presumably could compound the reduced stability caused by a lesion. A hypothesis is thus put forward that DNA lesion recognition occurs in two steps. Repair proteins initially recognize the weakened base stacking, and thus a flexible hinge at a DNA lesion. Sampling of flexible hinges rather than all DNA base pairs can reduce the task of finding a lesion by two to three orders of magnitude, from searching millions base pairs to thousands. After the initial encounter, a repair protein scrutinizes the shape, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic potentials of bases at the flexible hinge and dissociates if it is not a correct substrate. MutS, which has a broad range of substrates, actively dissociates from non-specific binding via an ATP-dependent proofreading mechanism. A single lesion may thus be sampled by BER, NER and MMR proteins until repaired. This proposition immediately suggests a mechanism for crosstalk between different repair and signaling pathways. It also raises the possibility that sampling of a lesion by one protein could facilitate loading of another by direct protein-protein or DNA mediated interactions.     

Multiple pathways for repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian chromosomes

To study repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian chromosomes, we designed DNA substrates containing a thymidine kinase (TK) gene disrupted by the 18-bp recognition site for yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Some substrates also contained a second defective TK gene sequence to serve as a genetic donor in recombinational repair. A genomic DSB was induced by introducing endonuclease I-SceI into cells containing a stably integrated DNA substrate. DSB repair was monitored by selection for TK-positive segregants. We observed that intrachromosomal DSB repair is accomplished with nearly equal efficiencies in either the presence or absence of a homologous donor sequence. DSB repair is achieved by nonhomologous end-joining or homologous recombination, but rarely by nonconservative single-strand annealing. Repair of a chromosomal DSB by homologous recombination occurs mainly by gene conversion and appears to require a donor sequence greater than a few hundred base pairs in length. Nonhomologous end-joining events typically involve loss of very few nucleotides, and some events are associated with gene amplification at the repaired locus. Additional studies revealed that precise religation of DNA ends with no other concomitant sequence alteration is a viable mode for repair of DSBs in a mammalian genome.     

Mechanism for verification of mismatched and homoduplex DNAs by nucleotides‐bound MutS analyzed by molecular dynamics simulations

In order to understand how MutS recognizes mismatched DNA and induces the reaction of DNA repair using ATP, the dynamics of the complexes of MutS (bound to the ADP and ATP nucleotides, or not) and DNA (with mismatched and matched base‐pairs) were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. As for DNA, the structure of the base‐pairs of the homoduplex DNA which interacted with the DNA recognition site of MutS was intermittently disturbed, indicating that the homoduplex DNA was unstable. As for MutS, the disordered loops in the ATPase domains, which are considered to be necessary for the induction of DNA repair, were close to (away from) the nucleotide‐binding sites in the ATPase domains when the nucleotides were (not) bound to MutS. This indicates that the ATPase domains changed their structural stability upon ATP binding using the disordered loop. Conformational analysis by principal component analysis showed that the nucleotide binding changed modes which have structurally solid ATPase domains and the large bending motion of the DNA from higher to lower frequencies. In the MutS–mismatched DNA complex bound to two nucleotides, the bending motion of the DNA at low frequency modes may play a role in triggering the formation of the sliding clamp for the following DNA‐repair reaction step. Moreover, MM‐PBSA/GBSA showed that the MutS–homoduplex DNA complex bound to two nucleotides was unstable because of the unfavorable interactions between MutS and DNA. This would trigger the ATP hydrolysis or separation of MutS and DNA to continue searching for mismatch base‐pairs. Proteins 2016; 84:1287–1303. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Regulation of DNA strand exchange in homologous recombination

Homologous recombination, the exchange of DNA strands between homologous DNA molecules, is involved in repair of many structural diverse DNA lesions. This versatility stems from multiple ways in which homologous DNA strands can be rearranged. At the core of homologous recombination are recombinase proteins such as RecA and RAD51 that mediate homology recognition and DNA strand exchange through formation of a dynamic nucleoprotein filament. Four stages in the life cycle of nucleoprotein filaments are filament nucleation, filament growth, homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange, and filament dissociation. Progression through this cycle requires a sequence of recombinase-DNA and recombinase protein-protein interactions coupled to ATP binding and hydrolysis. The function of recombinases is controlled by accessory proteins that allow coordination of strand exchange with other steps of homologous recombination and that tailor to the needs of specific aberrant DNA structures undergoing recombination. Accessory proteins are also able to reverse filament formation thereby guarding against inappropriate DNA rearrangements. The dynamic instability of the recombinase-DNA interactions allows both positive and negative action of accessory proteins thereby ensuring that genome maintenance by homologous recombination is not only flexible and versatile, but also accurate.     

Structure and organization of rhodophyte and chromophyte plastid genomes: implications for the ancestry of plastids

Summary Recombinational repair is the means by which DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired in yeast. DNA divergence between chromosomes was shown previously to inhibit repair in diploid G1 cells, resulting in chromosome loss at low nonlethal doses of ionizing radiation. Furthermore, 15–20% divergence prevents meiotic recombination between individual pairs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. carlsbergensis chromosomes in an otherwise S. cerevisiae background. Based on analysis of the efficiency of DSB-induced chromosome loss and direct genetic detection of intragenic recombination, we conclude that limited DSB recombinational repair can occur between homoeologous chromosomes. There is no difference in loss between a repair-proficient Pms⁺ strain and a mismatch repair mutant, pms1. Since DSB recombinational repair is tolerant of diverged DNAs, this type of repair could lead to novel genes and altered chromosomes. The sensitivity to DSB-induced loss of 11 individual yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) containing mouse or human (chromosome 21 or HeLa) DNA was determined. Recombinational repair between a pair of homologous HeLa YACs appears as efficient as that between homologous yeast chromosomes in that there is no loss at low radiation doses. Single YACs exhibited considerable variation in response, although the response for individual YACs was highly reproducible. Based on the results with the yeast homoeologous chromosomes, we propose that the potential exists for intra- YAC recombinational repair between diverged repeat DNA and that the extent of repair is dependent upon the amount of repeat DNA and the degree of divergence. The sensitivity of YACs containing mammalian DNA to ionizing radiation-induced loss may thus be an indicator of the extent of repeat DNA.     

Differential Mismatch Repair Can Explain the Disproportionalities between Physical Distances and Recombination Frequencies of Cyc1 Mutations in Yeast

Recombination rates have been examined in two-point crosses of various defined cyc1 mutations that cause the loss or nonfunction of iso-1-cytochrome c in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recombinants arising by three different means were investigated, including X-ray induced mitotic recombination, spontaneous mitotic recombination, and meiotic recombination. Heteroallelic diploid strains were derived by crossing cyc1 mutants containing a series of alterations at or near the same site to cyc1 mutants containing alterations at various distances. Marked disproportionalities between physical distances and recombination frequencies were observed with certain cyc1 mutations, indicating that certain mismatched bases can significantly affect recombination. The marker effects were more pronounced when the two mutational sites of the heteroalleles were within about 20 base pairs, but separated by at least 4 base pairs. Two alleles, cyc1-163 and cyc1-166, which arose by G.C----C.G transversions at nucleotide positions 3 and 194, respectively, gave rise to especially high rates of recombination. Other mutations having different substitutions at the same nucleotide positions were not associated with abnormally high recombination frequencies. We suggest that these marker effects are due to the lack of repair of either G/G or C/C mismatched base pairs, while the other mismatched base pair of the heteroallele undergoes substantial repair. Furthermore, we suggest that diminished recombination frequencies are due to the concomitant repair of both mismatches within the same DNA tract.     

AtMND1 is required for homologous pairing during meiosis in Arabidopsis

Background  

Pairing of homologous chromosomes at meiosis is an important requirement for recombination and balanced chromosome segregation among the products of meiotic division. Recombination is initiated by double strand breaks (DSBs) made by Spo11 followed by interaction of DSB sites with a homologous chromosome. This interaction requires the strand exchange proteins Rad51 and Dmc1 that bind to single stranded regions created by resection of ends at the site of DSBs and promote interactions with uncut DNA on the homologous partner. Recombination is also considered to be dependent on factors that stabilize interactions between homologous chromosomes. In budding yeast Hop2 and Mnd1 act as a complex to promote homologous pairing and recombination in conjunction with Rad51 and Dmc1.     

Molecular recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in CHO cells.

Molecular recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) have been examined in the G-0 and S phase of the cell cycle using a temperature-sensitive CHO cell line to test i) if there are cell cycle restrictions on the repair of DSB's' ii) the extent to which molecular recombination can be induced between either sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes and iii) whether repair of DSB's involves recombination (3). Mitomycin C (1-2 micrograms/ml) or ionizing radiation (50 krad) followed by incubation resulted in molecular recombination (hybrid DNA) in S phase cells. Approximately 0.03 to 0.10% of the molecules (number average molecular weight: 5.6 x 10(6) Daltons after shearing) had hybrid regions for more than 75% of their length. However, no recombination was detected in G-0 cells. Since the repair of DSB was observed in both stages with more than 50% of the breaks repaired in 5 hours, it appears that DSB repair in G-0 cells does not involve recombination between homologous chromosomes. The possibility is not excluded that repair in G-0 cells involves only small regions (less than 4 x 10(6) Daltons).     

A chimeric Rec-A protein that implicates non-Watson-Crick interactions in homologous pairing.

The helical filament formed by RecA protein on single-stranded DNA plays an important role in homologous recombination and pairs with a complementary single strand or homologous duplex DNA. The RecA nucleoprotein filament also recognizes an identical single strand. The chimeric protein, RecAc38, forms a nucleoprotein filament that recognizes a complementary strand but is defective in recognition of duplex DNA, and is associated with phenotypic defects in repair and recombination. As described here, RecAc38 nucleoprotein filament is also defective in recognition of an identical strand, either when the filament has within it a single strand or duplex DNA. A model that postulates three DNA binding sites rationalizes these observations and suggests that the third binding site mediates non-Watson-Crick interactions that are instrumental in recognition of homology in duplex DNA.     

Multicopy single-stranded DNA of Escherichia coli enhances mutation and recombination frequencies by titrating MutS protein

Multicopy single-stranded DNA (msDNA) molecules consist of single-stranded DNA covalently linked to RNA. In Escherichia coli , such molecules are encoded by genetic elements called retrons. The DNA moieties of msDNAs have characteristic stem-loop structures, and most of these structures contain mismatched base pairs. Previously, we showed that retrons encoding msDNAs with mismatched base pairs are mutagenic when present in multicopy plasmids. In this study we show that such msDNAs, in a similar manner to genetic defects in mismatch repair, increase the frequency of interspecies recombination in matings between Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli . To demonstrate interference with mismatch repair by msDNA, we show that the addition of a plasmid containing the gene for MutS protein suppresses the mutagenic and recombinogenic effects of msDNAs. We also show that in mutS mutants, msDNA does not increase the frequency of either mutations or interspecies recombination. We conclude from these findings that the mutagenic and recombinogenic effects of msDNAs are due to titrating out MutS protein.     

Human DNA ligase IV and the ligase IV/XRCC4 complex: analysis of nick ligation fidelity

In addition to linking nicked/fragmented DNA molecules back into a contiguous duplex, DNA ligases also have the capacity to influence the accuracy of DNA repair pathways via their tolerance/intolerance of nicks containing mismatched base pairs. Although human DNA ligase I (Okazaki fragment processing) and the human DNA ligase III/XRCC1 complex (general DNA repair) have been shown to be relatively intolerant of nicks containing mismatched base pairs, the human DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex has not been studied in this regard. Ligase IV/XRCC4 is the sole DNA ligase involved in the repair of double strand breaks (DSBs) via the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. During the repair of DSBs generated by chemical/physical damage as well as the repair of the programmed DSB intermediates of V(D)J recombination, there are scenarios where, at least conceptually, a capacity for ligating nicks containing mismatched base pairs would appear to be advantageous. Herein we examine whether ligase IV/XRCC4 can contribute a mismatched nick ligation activity to NHEJ. Toward this end, we (i) describe an E. coli-based coexpression system that provides relatively high yields of the ligase IV/XRCC4 complex, (ii) describe a unique rate-limiting step, which has bearing on how the complex is assayed, (iii) specifically analyze how XRCC4 influences ligase IV catalysis and substrate specificity, and (iv) probe the mismatch tolerance/intolerance of DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 via quantitative in vitro kinetic analyses. Analogous to most other DNA ligases, ligase IV/XRCC4 is shown to be fairly intolerant of nicks containing mismatched base pairs. These results are discussed in light of the biological roles of NHEJ.     

Unique invasions and resolutions: DNA repair proteins in meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster

To ensure the accurate disjunction of homologous chromosomes during meiosis, most eukaryotes rely on physical connections called chiasmata, which form at sites of crossing over. In the absence of crossing over, homologs may segregate randomly, resulting in high frequencies of aneuploid gametes. The process of meiotic recombination poses unique problems for the cell that must be overcome to ensure normal disjunction of homologous chromosomes. How is it ensured that crossovers occur between homologous chromosomes, rather than between sister chromatids? What determines the number and location of crossovers? The functions of DNA repair proteins hold some of the answers to these questions. In this review, we discuss DNA repair proteins that function in meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. We emphasize the processes of strand invasion and Holliday junction resolution in order to shed light on the questions raised above. Also, we compare the variety of ways several eukaryotes perform these processes and the different proteins they require.     

The evolution of meiosis: recruitment and modification of somatic DNA-repair proteins

Several DNA-damage detection and repair mechanisms have evolved to repair double-strand breaks induced by mutagens. Later in evolutionary history, DNA single- and double-strand cuts made possible immune diversity by V(D)J recombination and recombination at meiosis. Such cuts are induced endogenously and are highly regulated and controlled. In meiosis, DNA cuts are essential for the initiation of homologous recombination, and for the formation of joint molecule and crossovers. Many proteins that function during somatic DNA-damage detection and repair are also active during homologous recombination. However, their meiotic functions may be altered from their somatic roles through localization, posttranslational modifications and/or interactions with meiosis-specific proteins. Presumably, somatic repair functions and meiotic recombination diverged during evolution, resulting in adaptations specific to sexual reproduction. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Genetic exchange between homeologous sequences in mammalian chromosomes is averted by local homology requirements for initiation and resolution of recombination

We examined the mechanism by which recombination between imperfectly matched sequences (homeologous recombination) is suppressed in mammalian chromosomes. DNA substrates were constructed, each containing a thymidine kinase (tk) gene disrupted by insertion of an XhoI linker and referred to as a "recipient" gene. Each substrate also contained one of several "donor" tk sequences that could potentially correct the recipient gene via recombination. Each donor sequence either was perfectly homologous to the recipient gene or contained homeologous sequence sharing only 80% identity with the recipient gene. Mouse Ltk(-) fibroblasts were stably transfected with the various substrates and tk(+) segregants produced via intrachromosomal recombination were recovered. We observed exclusion of homeologous sequence from gene conversion tracts when homeologous sequence was positioned adjacent to homologous sequence in the donor but not when homeologous sequence was surrounded by homology in the donor. Our results support a model in which homeologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes is suppressed by a nondestructive dismantling of mismatched heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) intermediates. We suggest that mammalian cells do not dismantle mismatched hDNA by responding to mismatches in hDNA per se but rather rejection of mismatched hDNA appears to be driven by a requirement for localized homology for resolution of recombination.     

Mismatch Repair in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe Requires the Mutl Homologous Gene Pms1: Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis

Homologues of the bacterial mutS and mutL genes involved in DNA mismatch repair have been found in organisms from bacteria to humans. Here, we describe the structure and function of a newly identified Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene that encodes a predicted amino acid sequence of 794 residues with a high degree of homology to MutL related proteins. On the basis of its closer relationship to the eukaryotic ``PMS' genes than to the ``MLH' genes, we have designated the S. pombe homologue pms1. Disruption of the pms1 gene causes a significant increase of spontaneous mutagenesis as documented by reversion rate measurements. Tetrad analyses of crosses homozygous for the pms1 mutation reveal a reduction of spore viability from >92% to 80% associated with a low proportion (~50%) of meioses producing four viable spores and a significant, allele-dependent increase of the level of post-meiotic segregation of genetic marker allele pairs. The mutant phenotypes are consistent with a general function of pms1 in correction of mismatched base pairs arising as a consequence of DNA polymerase errors during DNA synthesis, or of hybrid DNA formation between homologous but not perfectly complementary DNA strands during meiotic recombination.     

Determinants of DNA mismatch recognition within the polymerase domain of the Klenow fragment.

The Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I catalyzes template-directed synthesis of DNA and uses a separate 3'-5' exonuclease activity to edit misincorporated bases. The polymerase and exonuclease activities are contained in separate structural domains. In this study, nine Klenow fragment derivatives containing mutations within the polymerase domain were examined for their interaction with model primer-template duplexes. The partitioning of the DNA primer terminus between the polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease active sites of the mutant proteins was assessed by time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy, utilizing a dansyl fluorophore attached to the DNA. Mutation of N845 or R668 disrupted favorable interactions between the Klenow fragment and a duplex containing a matched terminal base pair but had little effect when the terminus was mismatched. Thus, N845 and R668 are required for recognition of correct terminal base pairs in the DNA substrate. Mutation of N675, R835, R836, or R841 resulted in tighter polymerase site binding of DNA, suggesting that the side chains of these residues induce strain in the DNA and/or protein backbone. A double mutant (N675A/R841A) showed an even greater polymerase site partitioning than was displayed by either single mutation, indicating that such strain is additive. In both groups of mutant proteins, the ability to discriminate between duplexes containing matched or mismatched base pairs was impaired. In contrast, mutation of K758 or Q849 had no effect on partitioning relative to wild type, regardless of DNA mismatch character. These results demonstrate that DNA mismatch recognition is dependent on specific amino acid residues within the polymerase domain and is not governed solely by thermodynamic differences between correct and mismatched base pairs. Moreover, this study suggests a mechanism whereby the Klenow fragment is able to recognize polymerase errors following a misincorporation event, leading to their eventual removal by the 3'-5' exonuclease activity.