Aberrant regulation of MyoD1 contributes to the partially defective myogenic phenotype of BC3H1 cells [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1990 Jun;110(6):2231]

Two skeletal muscle-specific regulatory factors, myogenin and MyoD1, share extensive homology within a myc similarity region and have each been shown to activate the morphologic and molecular events associated with myogenesis after transfection into nonmyogenic cells. The BC3H1 muscle cell line expresses myogenin and other muscle-specific genes, but does not express MyoD1 during differentiation. BC3H1 cells also do not upregulate alpha-cardiac actin or fast myosin light chain, nor do they form multinucleate myotubes during differentiation. In this study, we examined the basis for the lack of MyoD1 expression in BC3H1 cells and investigated whether their failure to express MyoD1 is responsible for their defects in differentiation. We report that expression of an exogenous MyoD1 cDNA in BC3H1 cells was sufficient to elevate the expression of alpha-cardiac actin and fast myosin light chain, and to convert these cells to a phenotype that forms multinucleate myotubes during differentiation. Whereas myogenin and MyoD1 positively regulated their own expression in transfected 10T1/2 cells, they could not, either alone or in combination, activate MyoD1 expression in BC3H1 cells. Exposure of BC3H1 cells to 5-azacytidine also failed to activate MyoD1 expression or to rescue the cell's ability to fuse. These results suggest that BC3H1 cells may possess a defect that prevents activation of the MyoD1 gene by MyoD1 or myogenin. That an exogenous MyoD1 gene could rescue those aspects of the differentiation program that are defective in BC3H1 cells also suggests that the actions of MyoD1 and myogenin are not entirely redundant and that MyoD1 may be required for activation of the complete repertoire of events associated with myogenesis.     

Molecular control of myogenesis: antagonism between growth and differentiation

Insight into the molecular mechanisms that control establishment of the skeletal muscle phenotype has recently been obtained through cloning of a family of muscle-specific regulatory factors that can activate myogenesis when transfected into non-muscle cells. This family of factors, which includes MyoD, myogenin, myf-5, and MRF4, can bind DNA and transactivate muscle-specific genes in collaboration with ubiquitous cellular factors. Growth factors play an antagonistic role in myogenesis by suppressing the actions of the myogenic regulatory factor family. This review will focus on the regulation and mechanism of action of this family of myogenic regulatory factors and on the central role of peptide growth factors in modulating their expression and biological activities.     

The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAs differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.     

The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAS differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.