Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment

OBJECTIVE: In 1986, the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC) published quantitative criteria to assist diagnosis in a three-tier grading system of squamous cell dyskaryosis. In dyskaryotic cells, area nuclear to cytoplasmic (NC) ratios below 50%, between 50% and 66% and over 66% were defined as equating with mild, moderate and severe grades respectively. Following the Terminology Conference in 2002, however, the BSCC recommended on their website that the three-tier model should be replaced by a new two-tier system of low- and high-grade squamous abnormalities. The latter broadly equate with the two-grade Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting squamous intraepithelial lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the BSCC three-tier quantitative definitions, to investigate if they were applicable to liquid-based cytology (LBC) and to see how they related to the proposed new two-tier BSCC system. METHODS: Quantitative image analysis was undertaken on illustrations from the 1986 BSCC terminology publication and on microscope slides from external quality assessment and Cytology Training Centre teaching sets. RESULTS: Analysis of mean NC ratios showed that mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis exist as statistically different populations. Overlap of NC ratio ranges, however, limits their practical application in the three-tier model, although interestingly no overlap was noted between mild and severe dyskaryosis. No grade of dyskaryosis had a mean area NC ratio over 50%, indicating that the BSCC quantitative definitions are incorrect. The mean diameter NC ratios for mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis were found to be 40%, 49% and 66% respectively. Accordingly it is possible that those reporting cervical cytology could be interpreting the BSCC NC ratios as meaning diameter rather than area. Amalgamation of the three-tier results into the proposed two-tier model shows that the resulting mean NC area and diameter ratios identify statistically different low- and high-grade populations. The reduced degree of overlap, however, of NC ratio ranges in the two-tier model implies that NC ratios could have a useful practical role in the separation of the low- and high-grade categories. The two categories were reasonably well separated by mean area and diameter NC ratios of 25% and 50% respectively. A two-tier model combining mild with moderate rather than severe dyskaryosis was found to be a statistically valid alternative but gave rise to NC ratios that would be difficult to use in practice. Except for moderate dyskaryosis, no significant differences were identified between the mean NC ratios of either conventional and LBC preparations or LBC preparations using two different commercial methodologies (SurePath and ThinPrep). Differences, however, were noted in area measurements between SurePath and ThinPrep and this has potential implications for classifications (such as TBS) using area comparisons as their basis. In addition, it was found that the increased NC ratio, associated with higher grades of dyskaryosis is more a consequence of progressive cytoplasmic area reduction rather than nuclear area increase. The similar NC ratios of borderline nuclear changes associated with human papilloma virus and mild dyskaryosis support the BSCC proposal that these can be combined to constitute a low-grade category. This study shows that the BSCC area NC ratio criteria of grading squamous cell dyskaryosis require amendment. In addition, this study supports the new BSCC recommendation of low- and high-grade squamous cell categories. CONCLUSIONS: The study proposes Sheffield quantitative criteria to assist the grading of squamous cell abnormalities. Quantitative diameter NC ratio measurements, however, must always be accompanied by detailed assessment of qualitative morphological features and in particular those relating to nuclear chromatin. This is equally relevant to both two- and three-tier models.     

P-6SCREENER SENSITIVITY – ALL CHANGE FOR LBC

Introduction:  This poster aims to provide a discussion point for the calculation of screener performance. LBC has brought about changes in the way slides are interpreted, single dispersed isolated dyskaryotic cells take on a new meaning and the process of quality control, rapid review has changed. These changes challenge the rationale behind screener sensitivity calculations especially as many laboratories are in an early learning phase with regard to LBC.
Method:  Screener sensitivities and the PPV of reporting consultants for a period of six months post LBC conversion are compared with those since the introduction of LBC.
Results:  Screener sensitivities have dropped below the 95% threshold for high-grade dyskaryosis.
Discussion:  The change in rapid review or preview from a partial stepped rescreening of a conventional smear to a full rescreening of LBC slides has meant that all missed abnormalities that may not have been visualised in the conventional slide have a greater possibility of detection in the LBC slide. In analysing screener sensitivity a holistic approach that assesses the reasons for missing or misdiagnosing high-grade abnormalities is advised. Over reporting by consultants as indicated by PPV and slide review should be taken into account when there is a suspected poor performer. The recent move to refer all mild dyskaryotic smears for colposcopic assessment and the EQA requirement for screeners to detect dyskaryosis without the necessity for grading suggests that there may be a need to reassess the basis of current screener sensitivity calculations.     

The revised BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology

The BSCC terminology was originally published in 1986 and although highly successful, requires revision. Through a process of professional consensus and literature review this has been undertaken by the BSCC. The revision takes account of recent developments and improvements in understanding of morphology and disease process and is compatible with other terminologies in use elsewhere, whilst still maintaining a focus on practice in the UK cervical screening programmes.     

Do borderline nuclear changes in gynaecological cytlogy constitute a reliable reporting category?

Fourteen laboratories participated in a national slide exchange study to investigate whether borderline nuclear changes (BNC) constitute a reliable reporting category. Slides were submitted by participating laboratories, having achieved a 100% intralaboratory consensus at the primary screener, checker, and medical levels. Sets of seven slides were examined in laboratories for 1 week, and exchanges were undertaken over a 6-month period. Each laboratory was requested to submit three consensus opinions on each slide at the primary screener, checker, and medical levels.
Response patterns for submitted slides achieving a reporting category consensus at the 50 and 80% consensus levels indicated that negative, BNC, and mild dyskaryosis are distinct and comparable categories. Similarly, the two subcategories of BNC with or without human papillomavirus (HPV) are nearly as distinct as the overall BNC category.
The percentage of submitted slides achieving consensus at consensus levels between 50 and 80% produced variable findings with regard to the practical success of the main reporting categories. The negative category was reasonably successful, whereas mild dyskaryosis was consistently poor. Borderline nuclear changes were successful at the 50% consensus level but showed a rapid decline by the 65% consensus level. The reason(s) for this remains speculative but indicates a possible potential of BNC to work successfully with additional training and education.
Reporting practices were not consistent among the laboratories and differences were identified between medical and nonmedical staff. A high use of the BNC category was noted in slides that failed to achieve consensus. A national study assessing all grades of abnormalities would appear essential.     

Using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen

Objective:  To define a minimum acceptable total squamous cellularity for (ThinPrep^®) liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC) specimens using quality control techniques.
Methods:  Two hundred LBC preparations were made containing varying numbers (<200) of severely dyskaryotic squamous cells and with varying total cellularities.
Results:  Ninety-eight per cent of the LBC preparations that were missed by one or more of three cytoscreeners had fewer than 16 abnormal objects (single dyskaryotic cells or clumps of cells) and 87 dyskaryotic cells. The minimum ratio of dyskaryotic to total squamous cells that, in a preparation of 5000 squamous cells has a probability of at least 0.98 that 87 or more dyskaryotic cells will be present is 1 : 47. Twenty-three preparations diagnosed as abnormal had ratios of dyskaryotic to total squamous cells of between 1 : 2.5 and 1 : 4596. There is thus no feasible minimum acceptable squamous cellularity that will give an acceptable probability of detection of all specimen vials containing abnormal cells in the observed proportions.
Conclusions:  It is suggested that the minimum acceptable cellularity for LBC specimens is set pragmatically by the screening programme to give a feasible percentage of repeat tests.     

Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment

Objective: This study assesses the accuracy of published quantitative and qualitative criteria in the Bethesda System (TBS) for squamous intra‐epithelial lesions. Methods: Quantitative image analysis was undertaken on illustrations from TBS publications and also from slides in Cytology Training Centre teaching sets. Comparisons were also made with the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC) terminology in cervical cytology, using the illustrations in their terminology publication and amalgamating the results into their proposed new two‐tier model. Results: TBS quantitatively defines low‐grade squamous intra‐epithelial lesions (LSIL) in both conventional and liquid‐based cytology (LBC) preparations as showing nuclear enlargement more than ×3 the area of a normal intermediate squamous cell nucleus. This study found that the increase in mean nuclear area was limited to only ×2 in conventional preparations. In LBC (SurePath^TM) preparations, there was only a statistically non‐significant ×1.2 increase. This study identified a progressive and statistically significant reduction in mean cytoplasmic area from normal intermediate cells to LSIL and then to high‐grade squamous intra‐epithelial lesions (HSIL) in both conventional and LBC preparations. Furthermore, the most consistent quantitative finding in both conventional and LBC preparations was a statistically significant increase in the mean area and diameter ratios from normal intermediate cells to LSIL and then to HSIL. In all instances this varied from ×2 to just below ×3. This is in agreement with TBS, which states that the cytoplasmic area in HSIL is decreased leading to a marked increase in nuclear to cytoplasmic (NC) ratio. With the exception of an increase in mean nuclear area in conventional preparations from normal intermediate cells to LSIL, the predominant cause for this increase in NC ratios was a reduction in mean cytoplasmic area. The numerical increase in NC ratio for LSIL identified in this study was greater than implied by the ‘slightly increased’ statement in TBS. TBS comments that some HSIL cells can have the same degree of nuclear enlargement as in LSIL and that other HSIL cells may have much smaller nuclei than in LSIL. Both of these qualitative comments were supported in this study. The mean diameter NC ratios of 33% and 50% could provide useful diagnostic assistance in the distinction of normal intermediate cells and LSIL and between LSIL and HSIL, respectively. Because of overlapping individual ranges, however, additional diagnostic features such as nuclear morphology must be used in the distinction of normal intermediate cells, LSIL and HSIL. No statistical difference was identified in the mean diameter NC ratios between ASC‐US and LSIL in TBS publications. In addition, the proposed new BSCC low and high grades of squamous abnormality were not statistically different from ASC‐US/LSIL and HSIL, respectively. This provides support that the proposed BSCC two‐tier system of squamous abnormalities is comparable to TBS. This study shows that LBC has variable but major and significant effects on nuclear and cytoplasmic morphology and that quantitative definitions in conventional preparations cannot be automatically extrapolated to LBC methodology. Conclusions: The study shows that some TBS quantitative and qualitative criteria require amendment and that an alternative quantitative approach, such as diameter NC ratio has a more valid scientific evidence base. Furthermore, use of NC ratios avoids the problems associated with the variable changes in nuclear and cytoplasmic areas, occurring between conventional and different commercial LBC preparations. By contrast, classifications based on area comparisons must be tailored to the specific conventional or commercial LBC preparation.     

The evaluation of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens; using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assay

Objective:  To ascertain the usefulness of the Roche Linear Array human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay for assessing HPV genotypes in liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples and to evaluate this methodology within a cytopathology laboratory. These tests are of importance as persistent infection with high-risk HPV genotypes is considered a causal factor in the development of cervical cancer.
Methods:  A total of 175 cervical LBC samples were tested using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping test. The suitability of the assay use in routine cytopathology laboratory was considered. HPV genotypes were matched to the cervical cytology results, which included negative, borderline nuclear abnormalities, mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis.
Results:  The assay could be applied to screening samples with the combined result available at the reporting stage. There were no test failures. All samples used after cytological analysis had sufficient DNA for testing. The results were reproducible and easily read and there was concordance of results between biomedical scientists. The results of the assay showed co-infection with multiple HPV genotypes was common in both high-grade and low-grade cytology samples. The percentage of HPV+ samples in the normal cytology samples (although in this grouping the number of samples was low) was 37%. In the cytology samples reported as severe dyskaryosis the HPV genotypes most commonly found were HPV16 and HPV51.
Conclusion:  The assay was able to detect multiple HPV infection with a wide range of genotypes in LBC samples sent for routine cytological analysis. It would be suitable for use in a cytopathology laboratory. The results of the assay show that the genotype profile has some variation from other geographical regions, and more work is needed to determine population prevalence, to ascertain the impact of the HPV vaccine, to evaluate test for cure and HPV triage management.     

Advances in Targeted Therapies III, Nassau, Bahamas, 27 April-1 May 2001

This conference was the third in a series focusing on developments in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic conditions with biologicals; in many ways, it was perhaps the best one so far. One strength of the meeting was the mix of scientists from academia and from industry, and of workers in basic science as well as clinical investigators. The risks of inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were covered in depth for the first time. A number of putative and actual new targets were presented. An updated consensus document on the use of TNF inhibitors will appear in the near future in the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, authored by Dan Furst et al.     

Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference

During the 2011 International Pigment Cell Conference (IPCC), the Vitiligo European Taskforce (VETF) convened a consensus conference on issues of global importance for vitiligo clinical research. As suggested by an international panel of experts, the conference focused on four topics: classification and nomenclature; definition of stable disease; definition of Koebner's phenomenon (KP); and 'autoimmune vitiligo'. These topics were discussed in seven working groups representing different geographical regions. A consensus emerged that segmental vitiligo be classified separately from all other forms of vitiligo and that the term 'vitiligo' be used as an umbrella term for all non-segmental forms of vitiligo, including 'mixed vitiligo' in which segmental and non-segmental vitiligo are combined and which is considered a subgroup of vitiligo. Further, the conference recommends that disease stability be best assessed based on the stability of individual lesions rather than the overall stability of the disease as the latter is difficult to define precisely and reliably. The conference also endorsed the classification of KP for vitiligo as proposed by the VETF (history based, clinical observation based, or experimentally induced). Lastly, the conference agreed that 'autoimmune vitiligo' should not be used as a separate classification as published evidence indicates that the pathophysiology of all forms of vitiligo likely involves autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms.     

O-5Reporting profile review post LBC conversion

This study was undertaken by a pathology network providing cervical cytology screening services across two trusts, using SurePath LBC technology. The aim of this study was to establish if LBC screening results and histological correlation was in concordance with the pilot sites findings, with particular reference to glandular atypia. All the data was extrapolated from the Apex database for the specified times using Cognos. Data from Jan to Dec 2004 (last complete year conventional cytology) and Jan to Dec 2006 (first complete year LBC) have been used in this study.
In summary from 2004 to 2006 we found:
  A reduction in the inadequate rate to 1.1%
  Low-grade rates remained stable 4.9%
  High grade grades increased by 45% (PPV 84%)
  Glandular neoplasia increased by 75% with a PPV for endocervical origin of 92% and for endometrial cell origin of 43%
  Borderline endocervical rates remained stable 0.036% (PPV 50%)
The PPV of endometrial glandular neoplasia was disappointing and possibly reflects increased endometrial sampling, reduced adherence to mid-cycle sampling, and our lack of experience, resulting in poor endometrial interpretation. In conclusion, our data produced a different profile to the pilot sites with increase high grade and ? Glandular neoplasia reporting, but with a significant overcall in endometrial glandular neoplasia.     

O-2"ARTISTIC" TRIAL: BASELINE DATA

Recent reviews of glandular reports have confirmed a wide variation in specificity.^1–3 We have reviewed our performance over the last 10 years and evaluated the effect of conversion to Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) on our reporting rates and accuracy. Audit revealed an upward trend in ability to accurately detect glandular lesions, with particular improvement in identification of Cervical Glandular Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CGIN).
 

     

The use of the 'borderline' category in the reporting of cervical cytopathology in the UK: results of a survey conducted under the aegis of the British Society for Clinical Cytology

Objective: To determine how the ‘borderline’ category was used by cytopathologists in the UK when reporting cervical smears. Methods: A questionnaire was sent by email to members of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. Results: There is wide variation in the use of the ‘borderline’ category in the UK but the majority of respondents (77.6%) used it when reporting smears that were either on the borderline between negative and low grade squamous dyskaryosis (‘borderline ?low grade’), or on the borderline between negative and high grade squamous dyskaryosis (‘borderline ?high grade’), or on the borderline between negative and glandular dyskaryosis ‘borderline ?glandular dyskaryosis’). A significant minority (15.7%), however, did not use ‘borderline’ when reporting smears that showed an abnormality that was possibly high grade squamous dyskaryosis. A majority (79.1%) of respondents thought that it would be useful to have separate reporting categories for ‘borderline ?low grade’ and ‘borderline ?high grade’. Conclusions: There is diversity in the use of the category ‘borderline’ in the UK. The proposed revised BSCC terminology with separate categories for borderline ?low grade, borderline ?high grades and borderline ? glandular dyskaryosis reflects the opinion of the majority of respondents to the questionnaire.     

Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid‐based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis?

R. G. Blanks and R. S. Kelly
Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid‐based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis? Objective: To determine whether the difference between the positive predictive value (PPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) of referral from moderate dyskaryosis and from severe dyskaryosis was reduced after laboratories converted from conventional to liquid‐based cytology (LBC). Furthermore, to explore the cytology/histology agreement after LBC conversion, and to determine post‐LBC whether there was increased support for the use of one single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis (equivalent to high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). Methods: The association between cytology and histology has been examined using annual Korner return data (KC61 returns) collected by laboratories from the English National Health Service cervical screening programme. The study compares return data before and after LBC conversion. Results: The study examined data from 102 laboratories that converted from conventional cytology to LBC. Before conversion the PPV for CIN2+ of severe dyskaryosis was 88% and after increased to 90% (P = 0.003). For moderate dyskaryosis the PPV for CIN2+ increased from 70% to 72% (P = 0.06). The absolute difference of 18% between severe and moderate dyskaryosis was therefore the same pre‐ and post‐LBC conversion. The PPV of mild dyskaryosis for CIN2+ before and after conversion reduced from 23% to 19% (P < 0.001). The agreement between cytology and histology measured using a weighted Kappa statistic increased from 0.52 to 0.60 after conversion to LBC because of small increases in the proportions of severe dyskaryosis or worse with CIN3+ outcomes and mild dyskaryosis with CIN1 or less outcomes. Conclusions: Following LBC conversion there was evidence of a modest increase in the agreement between cytology and histology but no evidence of a change in the absolute difference in PPV for CIN2+ between moderate and severe dyskaryosis. The data support the conclusion that women referred with moderate dyskaryosis will on average have a lower risk of progression to invasive cancer than women referred with severe dyskaryosis. If the data were considered to support the categories of high‐grade dyskaryosis (moderate) and high‐grade dyskaryosis (severe) before LBC conversion then it can be strongly argued that they also support these categories after conversion.     

Liquid‐based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is currently being marketed as an alternative methodology to replace the conventional PAP smear in cervical cytology. A substantial body of literature exists in support of LBC, some of which is at least partially sponsored by product manufacturers. The majority of published literature in support of LBC employs Bethesda reporting terminology. In this study we have analysed published raw data and presented this in NHSCSP terminology. Claims relating to sensitivity, specificity and smear adequacy have then been considered with reference to this data. Our analysis of existing data does not support the nationwide implementation of LBC at present. Further studies are recommended in order to evaluate the place of this technology within the NHSCSP.     

Thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology processed by ThinPrep: an additional slide decreased the number of inadequate results

E. D. Rossi, F. Morassi, G. Santeusanio, G. F. Zannoni and G. Fadda
Thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology processed by ThinPrep: an additional slide decreased the number of inadequate results Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology is the most accurate tool for diagnosing thyroid nodules. Its accuracy is related to the rate of inadequate samples, which can be minimized with the adoption of on‐site assessment of the adequacy of the material. The introduction of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) in the thyroid does not allow checking on the adequacy of the cellularity. The possibility of making a second LBC slide for decreasing the number of non‐diagnostic cases is studied. Methods: Out of 553 cases diagnosed in a single institution from January to March 2005, 166 consecutive cases with an LBC slide reviewed by the same pathologist were evaluated. The cases were classified in a five‐tiered category system (Thy1 to 5 according to the British Thyroid Association guidelines) and all but two (with cystic degeneration) were processed by LBC and stained with Papanicolaou stain. The above‐mentioned categories are defined as follows: Thy1 inadequate or haemorrhagic, Thy2 non‐neoplastic lesion; Thy3 follicular lesion/suspected follicular neoplasm; Thy4 suspicious for malignancy; Thy5 diagnostic of malignancy. For each case the cytological diagnosis was made on the LBC slide and the adequacy of the cellularity for a conclusive diagnosis was assessed. Results: Of the 166 cases, 39 were non‐diagnostic (Thy1—inadequate), ten presented features of cystic degeneration (Thy1—haemorrhagic), 90 were benign (Thy2), 22 were diagnosed as a follicular lesion (Thy3), one as suspicious of malignancy (Thy4) and four as papillary carcinoma (Thy5). Thirty‐nine cases had a second LBC for achieving a definitive diagnosis with eventual re‐classification. Of these cases, 23 (61.5%) led to a conclusive diagnosis (18 Thy2, five Thy3) with a 18.5% decrease of the inadequacy rate. Conclusions: The making of an additional LBC slide helps in achieving a diagnosis in cases classified as non‐diagnostic on the first standard slide (52.1% recovery rate). This procedure is particularly helpful for meeting the adequacy criteria in benign and indeterminate lesions and could also be used for refining the diagnosis of suspicious for a malignant thyroid neoplasm.     

Towards a new classification system for legumes: Progress report from the 6th International Legume Conference

Legume systematists have been making great progress in understanding evolutionary relationships within the Leguminosae (Fabaceae), the third largest family of flowering plants. As the phylogenetic picture has become clearer, so too has the need for a revised classification of the family. The organization of the family into three subfamilies and 42 tribes is outdated and evolutionarily misleading. The three traditionally recognized subfamilies, Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae, do not adequately represent relationships within the family. The occasion of the Sixth International Legume Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa in January 2013, with its theme “Towards a new classification system for legumes,” provided the impetus to move forward with developing a new classification. A draft classification, based on current phylogenetic results and a set of principles and guidelines, was prepared in advance of the conference as the basis for discussion. The principles, guidelines, and draft classification were presented and debated at the conference. The objectives of the discussion were to develop consensus on the principles that should guide the development of the classification, to discuss the draft classification's strengths and weaknesses and make proposals for its revision, and identify and prioritize phylogenetic deficiencies that must be resolved before the classification could be published. This paper describes the collaborative process by a large group of legume systematists, publishing under the name Legume Phylogeny Working Group, to develop a new phylogenetic classification system for the Leguminosae. The goals of this paper are to inform the broader legume community, and others, of the need for a revised classification, and spell out clearly what the alternatives and challenges are for a new classification system for the family.     

Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling

Aim  Spatial modelling techniques are increasingly used in species distribution modelling. However, the implemented techniques differ in their modelling performance, and some consensus methods are needed to reduce the uncertainty of predictions. In this study, we tested the predictive accuracies of five consensus methods, namely Weighted Average (WA), Mean(All), Median(All), Median(PCA), and Best, for 28 threatened plant species.
Location  North-eastern Finland, Europe.
Methods  The spatial distributions of the plant species were forecasted using eight state-of-the-art single-modelling techniques providing an ensemble of predictions. The probability values of occurrence were then combined using five consensus algorithms. The predictive accuracies of the single-model and consensus methods were assessed by computing the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic plot.
Results  The mean AUC values varied between 0.697 (classification tree analysis) and 0.813 (random forest) for the single-models, and from 0.757 to 0.850 for the consensus methods. WA and Mean(All) consensus methods provided significantly more robust predictions than all the single-models and the other consensus methods.
Main conclusions  Consensus methods based on average function algorithms may increase significantly the accuracy of species distribution forecasts, and thus they show considerable promise for different conservation biological and biogeographical applications.     

Challenges in the diagnosis and management of disorders of sex development

Disorders of sex development (DSD) represent a spectrum of uncommon but very complex disorders with medical, psychosexual, and family implications for those affected by them. The diagnosis and management of these disorders requires a coordinated team of multiple specialists. Following an international conference in Chicago in 2005, a consensus statement was created and presented, which has resulted in a new paradigm in the nomenclature, classification, and management of DSDs. Since that time, many improvements have been forthcoming, most notably in the area of molecular genetic technologies. These developments have advanced our understanding of the specific etiologies underlying many of these conditions. In this article, we present an overview of the physiology of sex development, a few clinical vignettes highlighting specific pathologic conditions, discussions regarding the evaluation and management of these disorders, and some thoughts on future directions in this field. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 108:293–308, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.