HMGB1 protein inhibits DNA replication in vitro: a role of the acetylation and the acidic tail

The high mobility group box (HMGB) 1 protein is a very abundant and conserved protein that is implicated in many key cellular events but its functions within the nucleus remain elusive. The role of this protein in replication of closed circular DNA containing a eukaryotic origin of replication has been studied in vitro by using native and recombinant HMGB1 as well as various modified HMGB1 preparations such as truncated protein, lacking its C-terminal tail, in vivo acetylated protein, and recombinant HMGB1 phosphorylated in vitro by protein kinase C (PKC). Native HMGB1 extracted from tumour cells inhibits replication and this effect is reduced upon acetylation and completely abolished upon removal of the acidic C-terminal tail. Recombinant HMGB1, however, fails to inhibit replication but it acquires such a property following in vitro phosphorylation by PKC.     

Post-synthetic acetylation of HMGB1 protein modulates its interactions with supercoiled DNA

High mobility group box (HMGB) proteins 1 and 2 are abundant non-histone nuclear proteins that regulate chromatin structure because of their structure-specific binding to DNA. Here, we have investigated how the post-synthetic acetylation of HMGB1 affects its interaction with negatively supercoiled DNA by employing monoacetylated at Lys2 protein, isolated from butyrate-treated cells. Our data reveal that this modification enhances three reaction parameters: binding affinity, supercoiling activity and capacity to protect the supercoiled DNA from relaxation by topoisomerase I. We show that monoacetylation at Lys2 mimics the effect of acidic tail removal but to a lesser extent thus demonstrating that in vivo acetylated HMGB1 is capable of modulating its interaction with negatively supercoiled DNA.     

The DNA binding and bending activities of truncated tail-less HMGB1 protein are differentially affected by Lys-2 and Lys-81 residues and their acetylation

The role of lysines 2 and 81 as target sites for acetylation in full-length HMGB1 and truncated tail-less protein, respectively, has been studied by mutation analysis for the abilities of these proteins to bind and bend DNA. The DNA bending ability of truncated tail-less HMGB1 containing Lys-2 mutated to alanine does not differ from that of the wild-type protein, while the same mutation of Lys-81 reduced the bending capacity of the mutant protein. These data demonstrate that Lys-81 is critical for the DNA bending ability of truncated HMGB1. Such a conclusion is further confirmed by the experiments carried out with CBP-acetylated proteins: acetylation of Lys-2 in mutant protein K81/A81 alleviated DNA bending and induced DNA end-joining. On the contrary, the acetylation of Lys-81 in the mutant K2/A2 enhanced the bending potential of HMGB1∆C. Regarding the ability of HMGB1 to specifically bind bent DNA, the individual mutations of either K2 or K81 as well as the double mutation of both residues to alanine were found to completely abolish binding of truncated tail-less HMGB1 to cisplatin-modified DNA. We conclude that unlike the case with the bending ability of truncated HMGB1, where Lys-81 has a primary function, Lys-2 and Lys-81 are both critical for the protein''s binding to cisplatin-modified DNA. The mutation K2/A2 in full-length HMGB1 and acidic tail removal induce the same conformational changes. Any further substitutions at the acetylable lysines in the truncated form of HMGB1 do not have an additional effect.     

The interaction of HMGB1 and linker histones occurs through their acidic and basic tails

H1 and HMGB1 bind to linker DNA in chromatin, in the vicinity of the nucleosome dyad. They appear to have opposing effects on the nucleosome, H1 stabilising it by "sealing" two turns of DNA around the octamer, and HMGB1 destabilising it, probably by bending the adjacent DNA. Their presence in chromatin might be mutually exclusive. Displacement/replacement of one by the other as a result of their highly dynamic binding in vivo might, in principle, involve interactions between them. Chemical cross-linking and gel-filtration show that a 1:1 linker histone/HMGB1 complex is formed, which persists at physiological ionic strength, and that complex formation requires the acidic tail of HMGB1. NMR spectroscopy shows that the linker histone binds, predominantly through its basic C-terminal domain, to the acidic tail of HMGB1, thereby disrupting the interaction of the tail with the DNA-binding faces of the HMG boxes. A potential consequence of this interaction is enhanced DNA binding by HMGB1, and concomitantly lowered affinity of H1 for DNA. In a chromatin context, this might facilitate displacement of H1 by HMGB1.     

The effect of manganese(II) on the structure of DNA/HMGB1/H1 complexes: electronic and vibrational circular dichroism studies

The interactions were studied of DNA with the nonhistone chromatin protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese(II) ions at different protein to DNA and manganese to DNA phosphate ratios by using absorption and optical activity spectroscopy in the electronic [ultraviolet (UV) and electronic circular dichroism ECD)] and vibrational [infrared (IR) and vibrational circular dichroism (VCD)] regions. In the presence of Mn2+, the protein-DNA interactions differ from those without the ions and cause prominent DNA compaction and formation of large intermolecular complexes. At the same time, the presence of HMGB1 and H1 also changed the mode of interaction of Mn2+ with DNA, which now takes place mostly in the major groove of DNA involving N7(G), whereas interactions between Mn2+ and DNA phosphate groups are weakened by histone molecules. Considerable interactions were also detected of Mn2+ ions with aspartic and glutamic amino acid residues of the proteins.     

Fourier transform infrared/vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy as an informative tool for the investigation of large supramolecular complexes of biological macromolecules

A combination of ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) absorption and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was applied to investigate the structure and formation of large supramolecular DNA-protein complexes. This combination of techniques was used to overcome limitations of UV-CD (electronic, or ECD) spectroscopy due to considerable light scattering in such solutions. Based on the analysis of FTIR and UV-CD spectra, the interaction of DNA with nonhistone chromatin protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 was studied. The data obtained showed that under the conditions of the experiment (15 mM NaCl, protein/DNA ratio r < 1 w/w) the proteins did not reveal any AT or GC specificity in binding to DNA. In the presence of both proteins, mainly interactions in the DNA minor groove were observed, which were attributed to HMGB1 binding. Histone H1 facilitated binding of HMGB1 to DNA by interacting with the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone and binding of aspartic and glutamic amino acid residues of HMGB1. Acting together, HMGB1 and H1 stimulated the assemblage of supramolecular DNA-protein structures. The structural organization of the ternary complexes depended not only on the properties of the protein-DNA interactions but also on the interactions between HMGB1 and H1 molecules.     

The Effect of Ca2+ Ions on DNA Compaction in the Complex with HMGB1 Nonhistone Chromosomal Protein

The analysis of absorption and circular dichroism spectra in UV and IR regions showed that Ca²⁺ ions interact with the phosphate groups of DNA and the HMGB1 protein. Not only the negatively charged C-terminal part of the protein molecule, but also its DNA-binding domains participate in the interaction with metal ions. The latter leads to a change in the mode of protein–DNA interaction. The presence of Ca²⁺ ions prevents the formation of ordered supramolecular structures specific for the HMGB1–DNA complexes but promotes intermolecular aggregation. The structure of DNA complexes with the HMGB1 protein lacking the C-terminal tail appeared to be the most sensitive to the presence of Ca²⁺ ions. These data indicate that Ca²⁺ ions play no structural role in the HMGB1–DNA complexes, and their presence is not necessary for DNA compaction in such systems.     

Interaction of HMG proteins and H1 with hybrid PNA–DNA junctions

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of inserting peptide nucleic acid (PNA) sequences into the protein‐binding surface of an immobilized four‐way junction (4WJ). Here we compare the classic immobile DNA junction, J1, with two PNA containing hybrid junctions (4WJ‐PNA₁ and 4WJ‐PNA₃). The protein interactions of each 4WJ were evaluated using recombinant high mobility group proteins from rat (HMGB1b and HMGB1b/R26A) and human histone H1. In vitro studies show that both HMG and H1 proteins display high binding affinity toward 4WJ's. A 4WJ can access different conformations depending on ionic environment, most simply interpreted by a two‐state equilibrium between: (i) an open‐x state favored by absence of Mg²⁺, low salt, and protein binding, and (ii) a compact stacked‐x state favored by Mg²⁺. 4WJ‐PNA₃, like J1, shifts readily from an open to stacked conformation in the presence of Mg⁺², while 4WJ‐PNA₁ does not. Circular dichroism spectra indicate that HMGB1b recognizes each of the hybrid junctions. H1, however, displays a strong preference for J1 relative to the hybrids. More extensive binding analysis revealed that HMGB1b binds J1 and 4WJ‐PNA₃ with nearly identical affinity (K_Ds) and 4WJ‐PNA₁ with two‐fold lower affinity. Thus both the sequence/location of the PNA sequence and the protein determine the structural and protein recognition properties of 4WJs.     

DsRed-mediated oligomerization stabilizes HMGB1 on chromatin in vivo and on DNA in vitro

High-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) is remarkably mobile in living cells, which reflects its ability to interact only transiently with both DNA and protein. This property is likely essential for HMGB1 nuclear activities. Nonetheless the weak interaction of HMGB1 with DNA and/or protein partners has also been a major limitation for investigating HMGB1 subnuclear localisation and for the identification of HMGB1 containing complexes by conventional biochemical approaches. In the present study, FRAP experiments demonstrated that DsRed-mediated oligomerization strongly reduces HMGB1 mobility due to an increased affinity for cellular chromatin. Moreover, oligomerized DsRed–HMGB1 exhibited a higher affinity for supercoiled DNA in vitro compared to its monomeric counterpart. These results indicate that DsRed-meditated oligomerization is prone to stabilize labile interactions involving HMGB1 both in vivo and in vitro.     

HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs

High mobility group (HMG) proteins are nuclear proteins believed to significantly affect DNA interactions by altering nucleic acid flexibility. Group B (HMGB) proteins contain HMG box domains known to bind to the DNA minor groove without sequence specificity, slightly intercalating base pairs and inducing a strong bend in the DNA helical axis. A dual-beam optical tweezers system is used to extend double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the absence as well as presence of a single box derivative of human HMGB2 [HMGB2(box A)] and a double box derivative of rat HMGB1 [HMGB1(box A+box B)]. The single box domain is observed to reduce the persistence length of the double helix, generating sharp DNA bends with an average bending angle of 99 ± 9° and, at very high concentrations, stabilizing dsDNA against denaturation. The double box protein contains two consecutive HMG box domains joined by a flexible tether. This protein also reduces the DNA persistence length, induces an average bending angle of 77 ± 7°, and stabilizes dsDNA at significantly lower concentrations. These results suggest that single and double box proteins increase DNA flexibility and stability, albeit both effects are achieved at much lower protein concentrations for the double box. In addition, at low concentrations, the single box protein can alter DNA flexibility without stabilizing dsDNA, whereas stabilization at higher concentrations is likely achieved through a cooperative binding mode.     

The structure of the complexes of DNA with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions. I. Circular dicroism spectroscopy

The mechanisms of interaction of the non-histone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 with DNA have been studied using circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both of the proteins are located in the inter-nucleosomal regions of chromatin. It was demonstrated that properties of the DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and can not be considered as a simple summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown to be co-operative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of the HMGB1 with DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino-acid residues in the C-terminal domain of the HMGB1 protein. The observed joint action of the and H1 proteins stimulates DNA condensation with formation of the anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical psi-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on the DNA-protein interactions, but also on the interaction between HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the character of interactions between the components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. Binding of Mn2+ ions causes the weakening of the DNA-protein interactions and strengthening the protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.     

The S. cerevisiae architectural HMGB protein NHP6A complexed with DNA: DNA and protein conformational changes upon binding

NHP6A is a non-sequence-specific DNA-binding protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae which belongs to the HMGB protein family. Previously, we have solved the structure of NHP6A in the absence of DNA and modeled its interaction with DNA. Here, we present the refined solution structures of the NHP6A-DNA complex as well as the free 15bp DNA. Both the free and bound forms of the protein adopt the typical L-shaped HMGB domain fold. The DNA in the complex undergoes significant structural rearrangement from its free form while the protein shows smaller but significant conformational changes in the complex. Structural and mutational analysis as well as comparison of the complex with the free DNA provides insight into the factors that contribute to binding site selection and DNA deformations in the complex. Further insight into the amino acid determinants of DNA binding by HMGB domain proteins is given by a correlation study of NHP6A and 32 other HMGB domains belonging to both the DNA-sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific families of HMGB proteins. The resulting correlations can be rationalized by comparison of solved structures of HMGB proteins.     

Structure of DNA Complexes with Nonhistone Chromosomal Protein HMGB1 in the Presence of Manganese Ions

The complexes of DNA–HMGB1 protein–manganese ions have been studied using the circular dichroism (CD) technique. It was shown that the interactions of both the protein and metal ions with DNA in this three-component system differ from those in two-component complexes. The manganese ions did not affect the CD spectrum of the free HMGB1 protein. However, Mn²⁺ ions induced considerable changes in the CD spectrum of free DNA in the spectral range of 260–290 nm. The presence of Mn²⁺ ions prevented the formation of the ordered supramolecular structures typical of HMGB1–DNA complexes. The interaction of manganese ions with DNA had a marked influence on the local DNA structure, changing the properties of protein-binding sites and resulting in a marked decrease in cooperativity of HMGB1–DNA binding. Such changes in the mode of protein–DNA interactions occurred at concentrations as small as 0.01 mM Mn²⁺. Moreover, the changes in local DNA structure induced by the manganese ions promoted the appearance of new HMGB1 binding sites in the DNA double helix. At the same time, interactions with the HMGB1 protein induced alterations in the structure of the DNA double helix, which increased with an increase in the protein-to-DNA ratio. These alterations made the DNA–protein complex especially sensitive to manganese ions. Under these conditions the Mn²⁺ ions strongly affected the DNA structure, which was reflected in abrupt changes in the CD spectra of DNA in the complex in the range of 260–290 nm. Thus, structural changes in the DNA double helix in three-component DNA–HMGB1–Mn²⁺ complexes result from the combined and interdependent interactions of DNA with Mn²⁺ ions and HMGB1 molecules.     

Structure of DNA complexes with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions: 1. Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Mechanisms of interaction of DNA with nonhistone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 have been studied by means of circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both proteins are located in the internucleosomal regions of chromatin. It is demonstrated that the properties of DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and cannot be considered as a mere summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of the HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown with DNA to be cooperative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of HMGB1 to DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino acid residues in the C-terminal domain of HMGB1. The observed joint action of HMGB1 and H1 stimulates DNA condensation with the formation of anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical ψ-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on DNA-protein interactions but also on interaction between the HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the mode of interactions between components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. The binding of Mn²⁺ ions weakens DNA-protein interactions and strengthens protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.     

Human soluble thrombomodulin-induced blockade of peripheral HMGB1-dependent allodynia in mice requires both the lectin-like and EGF-like domains

Thrombomodulin (TM), an endothelial protein with anti-coagulant activity, is composed of 5 domains, D1-D5. Recombinant human soluble TM (TMα) consisting of D1-D3, which is generated in CHO cells, suppresses inflammatory and nociceptive signals by inactivating high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), one of damage-associated molecular patterns. TMα sequesters HMGB1 with the lectin-like D1 and promotes its degradation by thrombin binding to the EGF-like D2. We prepared TM's D123, D1 and D2 by the protein expression system of yeast, and evaluated their effects on HMGB1 degradation in vitro and on the allodynia caused by HMGB1 in distinct redox forms in mice in vivo. TMα and TM's D123, but not D1, promoted the thrombin-dependent degradation of all-thiol (at-HMGB1) and disulfide HMGB1 (ds-HMGB1), an effect mimicked by TM's D2, though to a lesser extent. Intraplantar administration of TMα and TM's D123, but not D1, D2 or D1 plus D2, strongly prevented the mechanical allodynia caused by intraplantar at-HMGB1, ds-HMGB1 or lipopolysaccharide in mice. Our data suggest that, apart from the role of D3, TMα and TM's D123 require both lectin-like D1 capable of sequestering HMGB1 and EGF-like D2 responsible for thrombin-dependent degradation of HMGB1, in abolishing the allodynia caused by exogenous or endogenous HMGB1.     

Determinants of specific binding of HMGB1 protein to hemicatenated DNA loops

Protein HMGB1 has long been known as one of the most abundant non-histone proteins in the nucleus of mammalian cells, and has regained interest recently for its function as an extracellular cytokine. As a DNA-binding protein, HMGB1 facilitates DNA-protein interactions by increasing the flexibility of the double helix, and binds specifically to distorted DNA structures. We have previously observed that HMGB1 binds with extremely high affinity to a novel DNA structure, hemicatenated DNA loops (hcDNA), in which double-stranded DNA fragments containing a tract of poly(CA).poly(TG) form a loop maintained at its base by a hemicatenane. Here, we show that the single HMGB1 domains A and B, the HMG-box domain of sex determination factor SRY, as well as the prokaryotic HMGB1-like protein HU, specifically interact with hcDNA (Kd approximately 0.5 nM). However, the affinity of full-length HMGB1 for hcDNA is three orders of magnitude higher (Kd<0.5 pM) and requires the simultaneous presence of both HMG-box domains A and B plus the acidic C-terminal tail on the molecule. Interestingly, the high affinity of the full-length protein for hcDNA does not decrease in the presence of magnesium. Experiments including a comparison of HMGB1 binding to hcDNA and to minicircles containing the CA/TG sequence, binding studies with HMGB1 mutated at intercalating amino acid residues (involved in recognition of distorted DNA structures), and exonuclease III footprinting, strongly suggest that the hemicatenane, not the DNA loop, is the main determinant of the affinity of HMGB1 for hcDNA. Experiments with supercoiled CA/TG-minicircles did not reveal any involvement of left-handed Z-DNA in HMGB1 binding. Our results point to a tight structural fit between HMGB1 and DNA hemicatenanes under physiological conditions, and suggest that one of the nuclear functions of HMGB1 could be linked to the possible presence of hemicatenanes in the cell.