Pull-push neuromodulation of LTP and LTD enables bidirectional experience-induced synaptic scaling in visual cortex

Neuromodulatory input, acting on G protein-coupled receptors, is essential for the induction of experience-dependent cortical plasticity. Here we report that G-coupled receptors in layer II/III of visual cortex control the polarity of synaptic plasticity through a pull-push regulation of LTP and LTD. In slices, receptors coupled to Gs promote LTP while suppressing LTD; conversely, receptors coupled to Gq11 promote LTD and suppress LTP. In vivo, the selective stimulation of Gs- or Gq11-coupled receptors brings the cortex into LTP-only or LTD-only states, which allows the potentiation or depression of targeted synapses with visual stimulation. The pull-push regulation of LTP/LTD occurs via direct control of the synaptic plasticity machinery and it is independent of changes in NMDAR activation or neuronal excitability. We propose these simple rules governing the pull-push control of LTP/LTD form a general metaplasticity mechanism that may contribute to neuromodulation of plasticity in other cortical circuits.     

LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches

LTP and LTD, the long-term potentiation and depression of excitatory synaptic transmission, are widespread phenomena expressed at possibly every excitatory synapse in the mammalian brain. It is now clear that "LTP" and "LTD" are not unitary phenomena. Their mechanisms vary depending on the synapses and circuits in which they operate. Here we review those forms of LTP and LTD for which mechanisms have been most firmly established. Examples are provided that show how these mechanisms can contribute to experience-dependent modifications of brain function.     

Spike timing-dependent LTP/LTD mediates visual experience-dependent plasticity in a developing retinotectal system

Sensory experience plays an instructive role in the development of the nervous system. Here we showed that visual experience can induce persistent modification of developing retinotectal circuits via spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Pairing light stimuli with spiking of the tectal cell induced persistent enhancement or reduction of light-evoked responses, with a dependence on the relative timing between light stimulus and postsynaptic spiking similar to that for STDP. Using precisely timed sequential three-bar stimulation to mimic a moving bar, we showed that spike timing-dependent LTP/LTD can account for the asymmetric modification of the tectal cell receptive field induced by moving bar. Furthermore, selective inhibition of signaling mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nitric oxide, which are respectively required for light-induced LTP and LTD, interfered with moving bar-induced temporally specific changes in the tectal cell responses. Together, these findings suggest that STDP can mediate sensory experience-dependent circuit refinement in the developing nervous system.     

Calcium- and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity.

Calcium ions play crucial signaling roles in many forms of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Recent presynaptic [Ca2+]i measurements and manipulation of presynaptic exogenous buffers reveal roles for residual [Ca2+]i following conditioning stimulation in all phases of short-term synaptic enhancement. Pharmacological manipulations implicate mitochondria in post-tetanic potentiation. New evidence supports an influence of Ca2+ in replacing depleted vesicles after synaptic depression. In addition, high-resolution measurements of [Ca2+]i in dendritic spines show how Ca2+ can encode the precise relative timing of presynaptic input and postsynaptic activity and generate long-term synaptic modifications of opposite polarity.     

LTP,memory and structural plasticity

Our current understanding of the mechanisms of information processing and storage in the brain, based on the concept proposed more than fifty years ago by D. Hebb, is that a key role is played by changes in synaptic efficacy induced by coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity. Decades of studies of the properties of long-term potentiation (LTP) have shown that this form of plasticity adequately fulfills these requirements and is likely to contribute to several models of learning and memory. Recent analyses of the molecular events implicated in LTP are consistent with the view that modifications of receptor properties or insertion of new receptors account for the potentiation of synaptic transmission. These experiments, however, have also uncovered an unexpected structural plasticity of synapses. Dendritic spines appear to be dynamic structures that can be formed, modified in their shape or eliminated under the influence of activity. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that LTP, in addition to changes in synaptic function, is also associated with mechanisms of synaptogenesis. We review here the evidence pointing to this activity-dependent remodeling and discuss the possible role of this structural plasticity for synaptic potentiation, learning and memory.     

Presynaptic LTP and LTD of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses

Ubiquitous forms of long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) are caused by enduring increases or decreases in neurotransmitter release. Such forms or presynaptic plasticity are equally observed at excitatory and inhibitory synapses and the list of locations expressing presynaptic LTP and LTD continues to grow. In addition to the mechanistically distinct forms of postsynaptic plasticity, presynaptic plasticity offers a powerful means to modify neural circuits. A wide range of induction mechanisms has been identified, some of which occur entirely in the presynaptic terminal, whereas others require retrograde signaling from the postsynaptic to presynaptic terminals. In spite of this diversity of induction mechanisms, some common induction rules can be identified across synapses. Although the precise molecular mechanism underlying long-term changes in transmitter release in most cases remains unclear, increasing evidence indicates that presynaptic LTP and LTD can occur in vivo and likely mediate some forms of learning.At several excitatory and inhibitory synapses, neuronal activity can trigger enduring increases or decreases in neurotransmitter release, thereby producing long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic strength, respectively. In the last decade, many studies have revealed that these forms of plasticity are ubiquitously expressed in the mammalian brain, and accumulating evidence indicates that they may underlie behavioral adaptations occurring in vivo. These studies have also uncovered a wide range of induction mechanisms, which converge on the presynaptic terminal where an enduring modification in the neurotransmitter release process takes place. Interestingly, presynaptic forms of LTP/LTD can coexist with classical forms of postsynaptic plasticity. Such diversity expands the dynamic range and repertoire by which neurons modify their synaptic connections. This review discusses mechanistic aspects of presynaptic LTP and LTD at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the mammalian brain, with an emphasis on recent findings.     

Glial cells in synaptic plasticity.

Plasticity of synaptic transmission is believed to be the cellular basis for learning and memory, and depends upon different pre- and post-synaptic neuronal mechanisms. Recently, however, an increasing number of studies have implicated a third element in plasticity; the perisynaptic glial cell. Originally glial cells were thought to be important for metabolic maintenance and support of the nervous system. However, work in the past decade has clearly demonstrated active involvement of glia in stability and overall nervous system function as well as synaptic plasticity. Through specific modulation of glial cell function, a wide variety of roles for glia in synaptic plasticity have been uncovered. Furthermore, interesting circumstantial evidence suggests a glial involvement in multiple other types of plasticity. We will discuss recent advances in neuron-glial interactions that take place during synaptic plasticity and explore different plasticity phenomena in which glial cells may be involved.     

Cadherins and synaptic plasticity

Given their trans-synaptic localization, their persistent expression at mature synapses and their distinct biochemical and adhesive properties, cadherins are uniquely poised at the synapse to mediate synaptic plasticity, the ability to change synaptic function thought to underlie learning and memory. For example recent work suggests that cadherins may recruit and stabilize AMPA receptors at the synapse via direct interactions or through complex formation, revealing cross talk between postsynaptic signaling and adhesion. Moreover, the use of small interfering RNA knockdown of cadherin, the availability of N-cadherin-deficient embryonic stem cells and the acute disruption of cadherin function with peptide application in vivo have allowed for more precise dissection of the molecular mechanisms by which cadherins function in both structural and functional plasticity.     

Roles of metabotropic glutamate receptors in LTP and LTD in the hippocampus.

Metabotropic L-glutamate receptors are involved in various forms of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. The use of a new antagonist (LY341495) that blocks all known metabotropic L-glutamate receptors in the brain, together with subtype-selective antagonists, has identified multiple roles both for cloned and novel metabotropic L-glutamate receptors in hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression.     

Learning-related long-term synaptic facilitation in snails: Possible mechanisms of long-term memory formation

The long-term changes in the electrical activity of command neurons related to sensitization and elaboration of associative defensive behavioral habit (food rejection) were studied inHelix snail. The long-term effects consisted of facilitation of synaptic components in neuronal responses to the test stimulations. Variations were found in the dynamics of long-term synaptic facilitation of responses to the applied chemical and tactile stimuli in the course of sensitization, as well as dependence of the degree of long-term facilitation of responses to the test stimulation at the site of its application with respect to the site of the sensitizing stimulation (site-specific sensitization). After conditioning, the synaptic response of command neurons to the conditioning stimulation appeared approximately 30 min later than did the long-term sensitization in these cells. The minimum duration of long-term synaptic facilitation of responses to the test stimulation varied from 1 h (for tactile stimulation) to 3 h (for chemical stimulation). The maximum duration of effects exceeded 4 h. It is suggested that the observed features of the synaptic plasticity in command neurons during learning are based on the selective regulation of synaptic inputs by specific protein regulators, whose lifespan does not exceed 1 h to 3 h.Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 383–389, September–October, 1993.     

Molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and memory.

To unravel the molecular and cellular bases of learning and memory is one of the most ambitious goals of modern science. The progress of recent years has not only brought us closer to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying stable, long-lasting changes in synaptic strength, but it has also provided further evidence that these mechanisms are required for memory formation.     

Determinants of spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity.

Recent studies show that the precise timing of presynaptic inputs and postsynaptic action potentials influences the strength and sign of synaptic plasticity. In this issue of Neuron, Sj?str?m and colleagues (2001) determine how this so-called spike timing-dependent plasticity depends on the frequency and strength of the presynaptic inputs.     

Protein homeostasis and synaptic plasticity

It is clear that de novo protein synthesis has an important function in synaptic transmission and plasticity. A substantial amount of work has shown that mRNA translation in the hippocampus is spatially controlled and that dendritic protein synthesis is required for different forms of long‐term synaptic plasticity. More recently, several studies have highlighted a function for protein degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system in synaptic plasticity. These observations suggest that changes in synaptic transmission involve extensive regulation of the synaptic proteome. Here, we review experimental data supporting the idea that protein homeostasis is a regulatory motif for synaptic plasticity.