Influence of autosome movements and of sex-chromosome movements on sex-chromosome segregation in crane fly spermatocytes

In crane fly spermatocyte meiosis 3 autosome half-bivalents normally move to each spindle pole in anaphase while the 2 amphitelic sex-chromosome univalents remain at the equator. The sex-chromosome univalents move to opposite poles after the autosomes reach the poles. — We used micromanipulation to detach half-bivalents in anaphase. When re-attached half-bivalents were syntelically oriented to the original pole, sex-chromosome segregation was usually not altered. When re-attached half-bivalents were amphitelically oriented, sex-chromosome segregation was usually altered: usually the amphitelic autosome segregated against one sex-chromosome while the other sex-chromosome remained at the equator. When re-attached half-bivalents were syntelically oriented to the opposite pole, sex-chromosome segregation was often altered: often one sex-chromosome moved normally to the spindle pole with 2 autosomal half-bivalents, while the other sex-chromosome did not move to the spindle pole with 4 autosomal half-bivalents, but remained at the equator. — The direction of motion of a sex-chromosome could be altered even after sex-chromosome segregation had begun, by suitable micromanipulation of the other sex-chromosome. — Amphitelic chromosomes that were not on the equator at the start of anaphase segregated predominantly to the closer spindle pole. Detached half-bivalents showed no preference for the closer pole when they re-attached with syntelic orientation. — We discuss some possible hypotheses for non-independent movements, and some implications of the results.     

Micromanipulation of mitotic chromosomes in PTK2 cells using laser-induced optical forces ("optical tweezers")

To study the potential use of optical forces to manipulate chromosome movement, we have used a Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 1.06 microns focused into a phase contrast microscope. Metaphase and anaphase chromosomes were exposed while being monitored by video microscopy. The results indicated that when optical forces were applied to late-moving metaphase chromosomes on the side closest to the nearest spindle pole, the trapped chromosomes initiated movement to the metaphase plate. The chromosome velocities were two to eight times the normal rate depending on the chromosome size, geometry, and trapping site. At the initiation of anaphase, a pair of chromatids could be held by the optical trap and kept motionless throughout anaphase while the other pairs of chromatids separated and moved to opposite spindle poles. As a result, the trapped chromosome either was incorporated into one of the daughter cells or was lost in the cleavage furrow, or the two chromatids eventually separated and moved to their respective daughter cells. If the trap was removed at the beginning of anaphase B, the chromosome moved back to the poles. Our experiments demonstrate that the laser-induced optical force trap is a potential new technique to study noninvasively the mitotic spindle of living cells.     

Mitosis with undivided chromosomes

Summary Cases of cell division with single chromatids are discussed in connection with a study on mitosis with undivided chromosomes made on living material of the endosperm of Haemanthus katharinae. Such divisions are known from certain abnormal mitoses in the microspores of a few plant species, and also from the second meiotic division, in which it is possible in numerous materials to study the behaviour of daughter univalents, and, in a few cases, also daughter chromosomes derived from chromosomes that were paired during the first division.The various cases of mitosis with single chromatids show a great variation with respect to the degree of scattering of the chromosomes over the spindle at metaphase. In a few cases there is practically no tendency to form a metaphase plate. In other cases the tendency to form such a plate is more or less pronounced, but also in these cases it is difficult for the chromosomes to form this arrangement. Some of them remain scattered over the spindle. After the metaphase a kind of anaphase usually follows in which the single chromatids, without division, move to the poles, often with other chromosomes lagging in intermediate positions.An approach of chromosomes to the poles may be caused by two different mechanisms in mitoses of this kind and only in a few cases is the information sufficient to show that active centromere movements occur during these anaphases.In many aspects of their behaviour on the spindle, single chromatids are similar to ordinary univalents of the first meiotic division. For this reason the movement mechanics of the chromosomes of the first meiotic division is briefly reviewed.The interpretation is expressed that the structure of the centromere region of a single chromatid shows some similarity to that of a univalent of the first meiotic division and that this may be the reason for their similar behaviour. The chromatid centromere would have a structural multiplicity with respect to its kinetic elements, corresponding to its subdivision in half-chromatids and also to the presence of two or three consecutive chromomeres in its longitudinal direction. As these kinetic elements are arranged close to one another on one side of the narrow cylinder of the centromere constriction, it is difficult for them to orient, towards both poles simultaneously. A single chromatid having a centromere of this kind will show orientation instability and change its orientation between the two unipolar orientations and various more or less bipolar orientations. The movements following these different orientations would cause the scattering of these single chromatids over the spindle. The orientation of ordinary mitotic metaphase chromosomes, consisting of two such chromatids, could often be the consequence of a process of co-orientation similar to that in meiotic bivalents.The anaphase movement of undivided chromosomes, which by active centromere movements are shifted in the polar directions without a separation of daughter components, is discussed with reference to a similar behaviour observed by Dietz in multivalents in Ostracods. These multivalents are stabilized in the equator during metaphase, in spite of the fact that they have two or three centromeres directed towards one pole and a single one towards the other. During anaphase their chromosomes do not separate but the whole configurations are shifted towards that pole towards which the majority of the centromeres are directed (this is followed by another type of movement which does not concern us in this connection). Undivided chromosomes that are oriented with more of their kinetic material towards one of the poles and less towards the other should by the same mechanisms as moved the multivalents be shifted in the equatorial direction during metaphase and in the polar direction during anaphase. The mechanism of these events is obscure. A change in the interpretation given by Dietz is suggested.This paper is dedicated to Professor Franz Schrader on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.     

Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria,Rhabdocoela)

At metaphase I of meiosis in spermatocytes of Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii [2n=10] three bivalents and four univalents form. The same two chromosome pairs always form the univalents. Analysis of metaphase I, anaphase I and metaphase II configurations in fixed testis material suggested that the distribution of the four univalents is not a random process but the correct segregation of one member of each pair to each pole is actively achieved before the end of metaphase I. In live preparations of testis material univalents were observed to move between the poles of metaphase I cells, eventually reaching the correct segregation. All cells observed to enter anaphase I had the correct segregation of univalents. It is proposed that the univalent movement during metaphase I is directed towards obtaining the correct segregation of univalents before the cells enter anaphase.     

Orientation of nonrandomly segregating sex chromosomes in spermatocytes of the flea beetle, Alagoasa bicolor L.

In males of the flea beetle, Alagoasa bicolor L., spermatocytes have two achiasmate sex chromosomes, X and Y, each of which is approximately five times larger than the ten pairs of chiasmate autosomes. At metaphase I, these univalent sex chromosomes are located on a spindle domain separated from the autosomal spindle domain by a sheath of mitochondria. A single centriole pair is located at each pole of the spindle. In prometaphase I, each sex chromosome appears to maintain an attachment to both spindle poles via kinetochore microtubules (i.e., amphitelic orientation). Before anaphase I, this orientation changes to the syntelic orientation (both sister kinetochores connected to the same pole), perhaps by the release of microtubule attachments from the more distant pole by each of the chromosomes. The syntelic orientation just prior to anaphase I leaves each sex chromosome attached to the nearest pole via kinetochore microtubules, ensuring nonrandom segregation. As the sex chromosomes reorient, the autosomes follow in a sequential manner, starting with the bivalent closest to the sex spindle domain. We report here data that shed new light on the mechanism of this exceptional meiotic chromosome behavior.     

Meiotic association and segregation of the achiasmatic giant sex chromosomes in the male field vole (Microtus agrestis)

Controversy exists regarding the meiotic behaviour of the giant sex chromosomes during spermatogenesis in the field vole, Microtus agrestis. Both univalents and bivalents have been observed between diakinesis and metaphase I. These differences seem to be dependent on the technique used. The present study employs electron microscopy of serially sectioned testes tubules and light microscopy of microspread preparations to re-examine the behaviour of sex chromosomes during meiosis. In microspreads, about one-third of the early pachytene nuclei examined showed end joining of the X and Y axes. The longitudinal heterogeneity of the chromosomes in the form of axial thickenings allowed the detection of two different end-joining patterns. In the remaining early pachytene cells as well as in all mid to late pachytene cells seen, the X and Y axes had, though near to each other, no contact in the form of a synaptonemal complex. If a synaptonemal complex is a prerequisite for genetic exchange, the sex chromosomes in M. agrestis males must be achiasmatic. The analysis of serial sections through an early pachytene and a late prophase I nucleus with the electron microscope revealed that the sex chromosomes occupied a common area. By metaphase I, the centromeres of the X and Y were oriented towards opposite spindle poles while the chromosomes remained attached to one another by their distal segments at the level of the metaphase I plate. As a consequence of the large size of the sex chromosomes their centromeres lay close to the spindle poles. In anaphase I the sex chromosomes maintained their metaphase position until the autosomes approached the spindle poles. During autosomal migration a medial constriction developed where the sex chromosomes were mutually associated, the X and Y became separated, and joined the autosomes. In metaphase II the chromatids of the sex chromosomes lay side by side and exhibited a delayed separation in the subsequent anaphase. It is suggested that heterochromatin, which represents a major part of both sex chromosomes, plays a role in the association of the two achiasmatic sex chromosomes in metaphase I and in the delayed separation of the chromatids of the sex chromosomes in anaphase II.Dedicated to Prof. C.-G. Arnold (Erlangen) on the occasion of his 60th birthday     

Ultrastructure of mitosis in the aphid-pathogenic fungusErynia neoaphidis

Summary An account of mitosis in the aphid-pathogenic, entomophthoraceous fungusErynia neoaphidis is presented. The mitotic apparatus is characterized by a closed, intranuclear, polarized spindle. Chromosomes are permanently attached by kinetochore microtubules (kcMTs) to the poles during mitosis. The spindle develops as the spindle pole bodies migrate and separate. At metaphase the eccentric spindle contains only kcMTs and is located in a relatively chromatinfree zone. Paired sister kinetochores are arranged in a broad metaphase plate. During anaphase kcMTs shorten, astral and nonchromosomal microtubules develop and elongate and the interpolar distance increases.     

Segregation of the amphitelically attached univalent X chromosome in the spittlebug <Emphasis Type="Italic">Philaenus spumarius</Emphasis>

In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes combine to form bivalents, which align on the metaphase plate. Homologous chromosomes then separate in anaphase I. Univalent sex chromosomes, on the other hand, are unable to segregate in the same way as homologous chromosomes of bivalents due to their lack of a homologous pairing partner in meiosis I. Here, we studied univalent segregation in a Hemipteran insect: the spittlebug Philaenus spumarius. We determined the chromosome number and sex determination mechanism in our population of P. spumarius and showed that, in male meiosis I, there is a univalent X chromosome. We discovered that the univalent X chromosome in primary spermatocytes forms an amphitelic attachment to the spindle and aligns on the metaphase plate with the autosomes. Interestingly, the X chromosome remains at spindle midzone long after the autosomes have separated. In late anaphase I, the X chromosome initiates movement towards one spindle pole. This movement appears to be correlated with a loss of microtubule connections between the kinetochore of one chromatid and its associated spindle pole.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

Relationship between the arrangement of microtubules and chromosome behaviour of syntelic autosomal univalents during prometaphase in crane fly spermatocytes

During meiotic prometaphase of crane fly spermatocytes, syntelic autosomal univalents are able to move between the spindle poles several times. The relationship between the behaviour of chromosomes and the arrangement of microtubules during this stage was studied using a fixation technique (Nicklas et al. 1979) which makes it possible to examine a certain cell in an electron microscope after live observation. After reorientation, when a syntelic univalent had started moving towards the opposite spindle pole, a short chromosome fibre was found. When a univalent had reached the equator, a chromosome fibre could be traced up to the spindle apex. During the movement towards the opposite spindle pole the degree of disorder in the chromosome fibre was high, whereas it was low in the fibre of a motionless univalent. The degree of disorder was determined by the relative proportion of skew fibre microtubules. At the beginning of reorientation a chromosome fibre was still present, but later, it was no longer possible to recognize such a fibre. Instead of a chromosome fibre, a bundle of microtubules laterally associated with the kinetochore was observed. Some microtubules of this bundle had a direct contact with the kinetochore. These observations strongly hint that the laterally associated microtubules have an important function in the reorientation of syntelic autosomal univalents.     

Malorientation in half-bivalents at anaphase: analysis of autosomal laggards in untreated, cold-treated, and cold-recovering crane fly spermatocytes

Exposing crane fly larvae to 6 degrees C or returning them to 22 degrees C after exposure to 6, 2, or 0.2 degrees C can induce any number of autosomes in their primary spermatocytes to lag near the spindle equator at anaphase. Autosomal laggards in cold-recovering cells are contained in bivalents until anaphase (Janicke, M. A., and J. R. LaFountain, 1982, Chromosoma, 85:619-631). We report here documentation that lagging autosomes in cold-treated and cold- recovering cells are maloriented. During meiosis I, half-bivalents usually associate with only one pole via kinetochore fibers, with sister chromatids being oriented to the same pole. In contrast, laggards had kinetochore microtubules (kMTs) extending from them toward both poles: one sister was oriented to one pole and the other had some or all of its kMTs extending toward the opposite pole. Bipolar malorientation of autosomal laggards also was observed in one untreated cell. The number of kMTs per half-bivalent was similar in lagging and non-lagging autosomes, and those kMTs were contained in long birefringent kinetochore fibers. The overall spindle structure in cold- recovering cells was similar to that observed in untreated anaphase cells. Giemsa-stained centromeric dots of sister chromatids were contiguous in non-laggards and separated in laggards at anaphase. We conclude that bipolar malorientations can exist at anaphase in chromosomes that remain paired until anaphase, that cold recovery increases the frequency of that anomaly, and that such malorientations may be one cause of anaphase lag.     

Chromosomes selectively detach at one pole and quickly move towards the opposite pole when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mesostoma ehrenbergii</Emphasis> spermatocytes

In a typical cell division, chromosomes align at the metaphase plate before anaphase commences. This is not the case in Mesostoma spermatocytes. Throughout prometaphase, the three bivalents persistently oscillate towards and away from either pole, at average speeds of 5–6 μm/min, without ever aligning at a metaphase plate. In our experiments, nocodazole (NOC) was added to prometaphase spermatocytes to depolymerize the microtubules. Traditional theories state that microtubules are the producers of force in the spindle, either by tubulin depolymerizing at the kinetochore (PacMan) or at the pole (Flux). Accordingly, if microtubules are quickly depolymerized, the chromosomes should arrest at the metaphase plate and not move. However, in 57/59 cells, at least one chromosome moved to a pole after NOC treatment, and in 52 of these cells, all three bivalents moved to the same pole. Thus, the movements are not random to one pole or other. After treatment with NOC, chromosome movement followed a consistent pattern. Bivalents stretched out towards both poles, paused, detached at one pole, and then the detached kinetochores quickly moved towards the other pole, reaching initial speeds up to more than 200 μm/min, much greater than anything previously recorded in this cell. As the NOC concentration increased, the average speeds increased and the microtubules disappeared faster. As the kinetochores approached the pole, they slowed down and eventually stopped. Similar results were obtained with colcemid treatment. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy confirms that microtubules are not associated with moving chromosomes. Thus, these rapid chromosome movements may be due to non-microtubule spindle components such as actin-myosin or the spindle matrix.     

The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement

At anaphase, the linkage betweeh sister chromatids is dissolved and the separated sisters move toward opposite poles of the spindle. We developed a method to purify metaphase and anaphase chromosomes from frog egg extracts and identified proteins that leave chromosomes at anaphase using a new form of expression screening. This approach identified Xkid, a Xenopus homolog of human Kid (kinesin-like DNA binding protein) as a protein that is degraded in anaphase by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Immunodepleting Xkid from egg extracts prevented normal chromosome alignment on the metaphase spindle. Adding a mild excess of wild-type or nondegradable Xkid to egg extracts prevented the separated chromosomes from moving toward the poles. We propose that Xkid provides the metaphase force that pushes chromosome arms toward the equator of the spindle and that its destruction is needed for anaphase chromosome movement.     

Pac-man motility of kinetochores unleashed by laser microsurgery

We report on experiments directly in living cells that reveal the regulation of kinetochore function by tension. X and Y sex chromosomes in crane fly (Nephrotoma suturalis) spermatocytes exhibit an atypical segregation mechanism in which each univalent maintains K-fibers to both poles. During anaphase, each maintains a leading fiber (which shortens) to one pole and a trailing fiber (which elongates) to the other. We used this intriguing behavior to study the motile states that X-Y kinetochores are able to support during anaphase. We used a laser microbeam to either sever a univalent along the plane of sister chromatid cohesion or knock out one of a univalent's two kinetochores to release one or both from the resistive influence of its sister's K-fiber. Released kinetochores with attached chromosome arms moved poleward at rates at least two times faster than normal. Furthermore, fluorescent speckle microscopy revealed that detached kinetochores converted their functional state from reverse pac-man to pac-man motility as a consequence of their release from mechanical tension. We conclude that kinetochores can exhibit pac-man motility, even though their normal behavior is dominated by traction fiber mechanics. Unleashing of kinetochore motility through loss of resistive force is further evidence for the emerging model that kinetochores are subject to tension-sensitive regulation.     

Studies on triploid Allium triquetrum

This work describes the relationship between the univalents seen at metaphase I and the distribution of dyads at anaphase I in the pollen mother cells of triploid Allium triquetrum. The orientation of the centromeres within the trivalents and bivalents at metaphase I towards the two poles of the pollen mother cells is random. The distribution of polar univalents towards the two poles at metaphase I is also random, as is the distribution of dyads at anaphase I in low univalent frequency collections. However, in a high univalent frequency collection, the distribution of dyads at anaphase I is non-random. There is an excess of cells with the most equal dyad distribution (13–14) and a paucity of cells with a 12–15 distribution. In low univalent frequency collections, the equatorial univalents are believed to remain in the equatorial region during anaphase I and are seen as laggards at late anaphase I. The remaining chromosomes move according to the metaphase I orientation of their centromeres to give a random distribution of dyads at anaphase I. In high univalent frequency collections it is argued that the non-random dyad distribution seen at anaphase I is the result of non-random movement of some of the equatorial univalents away from the equatorial region during anaphase I. The remaining equatorial univalents remain in the equatorial region and are seen as laggards at late anaphase I.     

Thrombopoietin-induced Polyploidization of Bone Marrow Megakaryocytes Is Due to a Unique Regulatory Mechanism in Late Mitosis

Megakaryocytes undergo a unique differentiation program, becoming polyploid through repeated cycles of DNA synthesis without concomitant cell division. However, the mechanism underlying this polyploidization remains totally unknown. It has been postulated that polyploidization is due to a skipping of mitosis after each round of DNA replication. We carried out immunohistochemical studies on mouse bone marrow megakaryocytes during thrombopoietin- induced polyploidization and found that during this process megakaryocytes indeed enter mitosis and progress through normal prophase, prometaphase, metaphase, and up to anaphase A, but not to anaphase B, telophase, or cytokinesis. It was clearly observed that multiple spindle poles were formed as the polyploid megakaryocytes entered mitosis; the nuclear membrane broke down during prophase; the sister chromatids were aligned on a multifaced plate, and the centrosomes were symmetrically located on either side of each face of the plate at metaphase; and a set of sister chromatids moved into the multiple centrosomes during anaphase A. We further noted that the pair of spindle poles in anaphase were located in close proximity to each other, probably because of the lack of outward movement of spindle poles during anaphase B. Thus, the reassembling nuclear envelope may enclose all the sister chromatids in a single nucleus at anaphase and then skip telophase and cytokinesis. These observations clearly indicate that polyploidization of megakaryocytes is not simply due to a skipping of mitosis, and that the megakaryocytes must have a unique regulatory mechanism in anaphase, e.g., factors regulating anaphase such as microtubule motor proteins might be involved in this polyploidization process.     

Dynamics of Centromeres during Metaphase–Anaphase Transition in Fission Yeast: Dis1 Is Implicated in Force Balance in Metaphase Bipolar Spindle

In higher eukaryotic cells, the spindle forms along with chromosome condensation in mitotic prophase. In metaphase, chromosomes are aligned on the spindle with sister kinetochores facing toward the opposite poles. In anaphase A, sister chromatids separate from each other without spindle extension, whereas spindle elongation takes place during anaphase B. We have critically examined whether such mitotic stages also occur in a lower eukaryote, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Using the green fluorescent protein tagging technique, early mitotic to late anaphase events were observed in living fission yeast cells. S. pombe has three phases in spindle dynamics, spindle formation (phase 1), constant spindle length (phase 2), and spindle extension (phase 3). Sister centromere separation (anaphase A) rapidly occurred at the end of phase 2. The centromere showed dynamic movements throughout phase 2 as it moved back and forth and was transiently split in two before its separation, suggesting that the centromere was positioned in a bioriented manner toward the poles at metaphase. Microtubule-associating Dis1 was required for the occurrence of constant spindle length and centromere movement in phase 2. Normal transition from phase 2 to 3 needed DNA topoisomerase II and Cut1 but not Cut14. The duration of each phase was highly dependent on temperature.     

Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast

The spindle checkpoint delays the onset of anaphase until all pairs of sister chromatids are attached to the mitotic spindle. The checkpoint could monitor the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores, the tension that results from the two sister chromatids attaching to opposite spindle poles, or both. We tested the role of tension by allowing cells to enter mitosis without a prior round of DNA replication. The unreplicated chromatids are attached to spindle microtubules but are not under tension since they lack a sister chromatid that could attach to the opposite pole. Because the spindle checkpoint is activated in these cells, we conclude that the absence of tension at the yeast kinetochore is sufficient to activate the spindle checkpoint in mitosis.     

Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells

Spindle microtubules (MTs) in PtK1 cells, fixed at stages from metaphase to telophase, have been reconstructed using serial sections, electron microscopy, and computer image processing. We have studied the class of MTs that form an interdigitating system connecting the two spindle poles (interpolar MTs or ipMTs) and their relationship to the spindle MTs that attach to kinetochores (kMTs). Viewed in cross section, the ipMTs cluster with antiparallel near neighbors throughout mitosis; this bundling becomes much more pronounced as anaphase proceeds. While the minus ends of most kMTs are near the poles, those of the ipMTs are spread over half of the spindle length, with at least 50% lying > 1.5 microns from the poles. Longitudinal views of the ipMT bundles demonstrate a major rearrangement of their plus ends between mid- and late anaphase B. However, the minus ends of these MTs do not move appreciably farther from the spindle midplane, suggesting that sliding of these MTs contributes little to anaphase B. The minus ends of ipMTs are markedly clustered in the bundles of kMTs throughout anaphase A. These ends lie close to kMTs much more frequently than would be expected by chance, suggesting a specific interaction. As sister kinetochores separate and kMTs shorten, the minus ends of the kMTs remain associated with the spindle poles, but the minus ends of many ipMTs are released from the kMT bundles, allowing the spindle pole and the kMTs to move away from the ipMTs as the spindle elongates.     

Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice.

In mouse oocytes, the first meiotic spindle is formed through the action of multiple microtubule organizing centers rather than a pair of centrosomes. Although the chromosomes are thought to play a major role in organizing the meiotic spindle, it remains unclear how a stable bipolar spindle is established. We have studied the formation of the first meiotic spindle in murine oocytes from mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the DNA mismatch repair gene, Mlh1. In the absence of the MLH1 protein meiotic recombination is dramatically reduced and, as a result, the vast majority of chromosomes are present as unpaired univalents at the first meiotic division. The orientation of these univalent chromosomes at prometaphase suggests that they are unable to establish stable bipolar spindle attachments, presumably due to the inability to differentiate functional kinetochore domains on individual sister chromatids. In the presence of this aberrant chromosome behavior a stable first meiotic spindle is not formed, the spindle poles continue to elongate, and the vast majority of cells never initiate anaphase. These results suggest that, in female meiotic systems in which spindle formation is based on the action of multiple microtubule organizing centers, the chromosomes not only promote microtubule polymerization and organization but their attachment to opposite spindle poles acts to stabilize the forming spindle poles.