Mirror guided behavior in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata fuscata)

Two male Japanese monkeys were trained to use a mirror to reach an object that could not be seen directly. Training to use a mirror in this way proceeded, step-by-step, from reaching a piece of apple to key-tracking. In Experiment 1 the monkeys were trained to use the mirror to locate a desired object, a piece of apple in a box facing the mirror, which could be seen only by looking into the mirror. The apple, once located, however, could be grasped without further reference to the mirror. This behavior is referred to as mirror mediated object discrimination. In subsequent experiments the monkeys could not reach the goal object except by observing it and his hand movement in the mirror. In Experiment 2 the target was a piece of apple visible in the mirror, in Experiment 3 an illuminated key and in Experiment 4 a series of keys which were illuminated sequentially. Mirror guided behavior such as shown in Experiment 2, 3, and 4 has not previously been demonstrated in monkeys.     

Use of a mirror to direct their responses in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata fuscata)

Two male Japanese monkeys used a mirror to inspect an object attached to their bodies but not directly visible. These monkeys had been trained previously to use a mirror to guide their hand to a target. In Experiment 1 their behavior in the presence of a mirror was observed. In Experiment 2 the monkeys used the mirror to locate a picture projected on a screen to the left or right rear side of the cage. In Experiment 3 the monkeys used a mirror to observe and finally grasp an object attached behind their heads. Two monkeys who were not trained to use a mirror to obtain an otherwise hidden object did not show such behavior.     

Development of tool use in a macaque and a gorilla

The development of the capacity to use a stick as a tool was tested in a macaque (Macaca fuscata) and a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) infants that had previously shown to be able to use strings and supports as dragging tools. Subjects were tested between 15 and 38 months of age. Different levels of competence between the subjects emerged over testing. The macaque developed a stereotyped strategy to cope with the problem, only getting random successes, whilst the gorilla developed a flexible strategy and revealed to be able to mentally represent the solution of the problem. In fact, when not successful using the stick, the gorilla thought out an alternative strategy, choosing and adapting a new object to use it as a tool.     

Failure to demonstrate self-recognition in gorillas

Two zoo-reared gorillas were each given nearly 400 h of mirror exposure. Extensive mirror gazing and social behaviors were exhibited, the frequency of which decreased gradually over the study period. Neither animal demonstrated the transition from other-directed to self-directed behavior characteristic of both chimpanzees and orangutans, and no evidence of self-recognition was found using the Gallup marking paradigm. These negative findings, after extensive mirror exposure, suggest that the gorilla may be the only great ape which lacks the conceptual ability necessary for self-recognition.     

Another gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) recognizes himself in a mirror

Various attempts have been made to explain why gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) find it difficult to recognize their mirror image. One of the most oft-cited reasons is aversion to eye contact, which stops gorillas from looking into a mirror and thus prevents them from carrying out a suitable exploration that could lead to self-recognition. In the experimental design used here the subject was first habituated both to observers and to the mirror as an object before being exposed to the latter. The study was performed with a single subject who was well adapted to captivity and exhibited no aberrant behavior or signs of stress. The results revealed that the subject had no aversion to eye contact. He showed considerable interest in the mirror and appeared relaxed when faced with his image. He gave a positive response to the mark test.     

Nonsocial behavior of captive infant gorillas

Frequencies of eight nonsocial behaviors (object contact, environmental exploration, mouthing, self-directed behavior, display behavior, solitary behavior, rest, and locomotion) were obtained for 20 infant lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) between 14 and 36 months of age. They lived in 13 groups in 10 zoological collections. Approximately 12 hours of one-zero data were collected on each animal. Behavioral data were analyzed with regard to the following independent variables: rearing history of the focal animal (mother-reared vs. human-reared), time of day (a.m. vs. p.m.), sex of the focal animal, age of the focal animal, and complexity of the physical and social environment. Results indicated significant differences in the frequency of behaviors within each independent variable, including selfdirected behavior, rest, environmental exploration, and display behavior with rearing history. Additional significant differences in the frequencies of behavior were also found, including mouthing behavior and locomotion with infant age.     

Nitrogen regulation of transport operons: analysis of promoters argTr and dhuA

Summary In Salmonella typhimurium the periplasmic permeases for histidine and for lysine-arginine-ornithine are regulated by nitrogen availability. The nature of the dhuA and argTr promoters of the operons coding for these permeases was analyzed by placing the galactokinase gene under their control (in vector pKO-1). argTr was found to respond to nitrogen regulation. We investigated the involvement of a mirror symmetry in argTr in its regulation by nitrogen. It had been postulated previously (Higgins and Ames 1982) that mirror symmetries might act as protein recognition sites important in regulation of gene expression. Here we demonstrate that the mirror symmetry in argTr is not involved in nitrogen control. Contrary to expectation, the galK gene was not regulated by nitrogen when it was placed under dhuA control. Here we propose a possible explanation for this finding.     

Learning how to learn: The significance and current status of learning set formation

In honor of the memory ofHarry F. Harlow, this paper reviews the current status of learning set formation, the discovery of which represents one ofHarlow's major contributions to behavioral science. Learning set formation or “learning how to learn” refers to the learning of visual and other types of discrimination problems progressively more quickly as a function of training on a series of such problems. The general procedure thatHarlow used, his original learning set finding, and its significance are described first. A brief review of theories of learning set formation follows. Lastly, the attempt to use learning set formation as a tool for studying comparative behavior is discussed. This article is based on a paper by the author delivered at:A. M. Schrier andS. J. Suomi (cochairs),Primate Behavior: A Symposium in Memory of Harry F. Harlow. Symposium presented at the IXth Congress of the International Primatological Society, Atlanta, Georgia, August 1982.     

Ontogeny of mirror behavior in two species of great apes

Mirror image reactions of two infant apes, a female chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and a male orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), born at the Zoo de Vincennes and the Jardin des Plantes of Paris, France, respectively, were studied and compared with those of children. Self-recognition was also tested following 46.5 hours of mirror exposure by application of red marks on parts of the body invisible to the animal without the aid of the mirror. Results indicated that the behavior of the two young apes followed a developmental trend similar to that of human babies. At the end of the study, the female chimpanzee (11 months of age) expressed social behavior, searched for the image behind the mirror, and showed interest in imaged movement. The orangutan (2 years and 5 months old) had begun to test movement synchronism and to display self-directed behaviors. The tests of self-recognition yielded negative results in both animals.     

D-Amino acids in protein de novo design. II. Protein-diastereomerism versus protein-enantiomerism

Summary With a few exceptions, proteins in our biosphere are based exclusively onl-amino acids. The inversion of configuration of all the stereogenic centers in a protein leads to anall-d compound with ‘mirror image’ properties and ‘mirror image’ structure. We propose to use the termprotein-enantiomerism to describe the relationship between two proteins that have the same sequence but whose amino acids have opposite configuration. We will use the termprotein-diastereomerism to define the relationship between two proteins that have the same sequence in which some amino acids have opposite configurations. A classification of type I, II, III, and IV protein-diastereomerism is proposed. By extension, a diastereoprotein is a protein where some amino acids have the same configuration (l ord) while others have the opposite one (d orl). A particular case of diastereoproteins aremesoproteins, also analyzed in this article. In addition to the goal of making proteins resistant to protease degradation, the use ofd-amino acids in protein de novo design may give rise to proteins with structures, and perhaps properties, very different to those of nativeall-l-proteins.     

Mirror responses in a group of Miopithecus talapoin

Studies of non-human primate self-recognition in mirrors demonstrate variation both within and between species. This study applied a rigorous methodology that took into account habituation of subjects to the mirror as an object and to the experimental situation. The species observed in our study was Miopithecus talapoin, which has been little studied in the wild or in captivity. Although this species shows several interesting characteristics, including complex social organisation and a high encephalization index, the talapoin monkeys in the study did not pass the mark test; however, they showed a prerequisite for self-recognition, namely comparing their body parts to the image of these in the mirror.     

In vivo inhibition of nitrogenase by hydroxylamine in Rhodospirillaceae Role of nitric oxide

Rhodobacter capsulatus strains E1F1 and B10 and Rhodobacter sphaeroides DSM 158 did not use hydroxylamine as nitrogen source for growth but metabolized it mainly through the glutamine synthetase reaction. Hydroxylamine had a high toxicity for cells growing either under phototrophic or dark-aerobic conditions. l-methionine-d,l-sulfoximine partially inhibited hydroxylamine uptake and increased the inhibition time of nitrogenase activity by this nitrogen compound. Nitric oxide was also a powerful inhibitor of nitrogenase in intact cells of R. capsulatus. Since low amounts of NO were produced from hydroxylamine, short-term inhibition of nitrogenase in the presence of this compound could be mediated in vivo by nitric oxide.Abbreviations GS glutamine synthetase - MSX l-methionine-d,l-sulfoximine - MTA mixed alkyltrimethylammonium bromide     

Variation in aggressive behaviour in the poeciliid fish Brachyrhaphis episcopi: Population and sex differences

Aggression is often positively correlated with other behavioural traits such as boldness and activity levels. Comparisons across populations can help to determine factors that promote the evolution of such traits. We quantified these behaviours by testing the responses of wild-caught poeciliid fish, Brachyrhaphis episcopi, to mirror image stimuli. This species occurs in populations that experience either high or low levels of predation pressure. Previous studies have shown that B. episcopi from low predation environments are less bold than those that occur with many predators. We therefore predicted that fish from high predation populations would be more aggressive and more active than fish from low predation populations. However, we found the opposite - low predation fish approached a mirror and a novel object more frequently than high predation fish suggesting that ‘boldness’ and aggression were higher in low predation populations, and that population-level boldness measures may vary depending on context. When tested individually, low predation fish inspected their mirror image more frequently. Females, but not males, from low predation sites were also more aggressive towards their mirror image. Variation in female aggression may be driven by a trade-off between food availability and predation risk. This suggests that the relationship between aggression and boldness has been shaped by adaptation to environmental conditions, and not genetic constraints.     

Using Dung to Estimate Gorilla Density: Modeling Dung Production Rate

There is an urgent need for information on western gorilla population sizes and distribution to improve present and plan future conservation actions. Researchers traditionally have estimated gorilla densities on the basis of nest counts despite demonstrated variation in nest production and decay rates. The variation may lead to large biases in estimates of gorilla abundance. We investigated the use of an alternate index of gorilla abundance, via defecation data collected from habituated gorillas at Bai Hokou, Central African Republic. Our sample of 274/370 defecation events/dung piles produced a production rate of ca. 5 dung piles/d: comparable to previous estimates based on much smaller sample sizes. Heuristic models that failed to account for imperfect dung pile detection produced a lower defecation rate estimate than that of a maximum likelihood model that explicitly modeled detection probability. Generalized linear modeling (GLM) showed that dung pile production rate was strongly linked to rainfall, suggesting that failure to correct for seasonal variation in dung pile production rates could lead to substantial biases in gorilla abundance estimates. In our study, failing to distinguish between the number of defecation events and the number of dung piles produced would lead to a ca. 31% overestimate of true gorilla numbers. The use of dung as an index of gorilla abundance shows potential, but more fieldwork and modeling on seasonal variation in dung production rates is required.     

Play behaviour in lowland gorillas: Age differences,sex differences,and possible functions

A study on lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) play behaviour was conducted on four exhibits at three different zoological parks so that 19 gorillas were observed. Juvenile gorillas played the most, but play continued at fairly high frequencies through adolescence. Most social play occurred between dyads. Triadic groups usually chased each other. No sex differences in type of play were observed, but gender differences in partner preferences were observed. Males played with both other males and females, while females seldom played together. These data support the social skills hypothesis (Baldwin & Baldwin, 1974) of play. Data were gathered while the author was a graduate student at Tulane University and a visiting lecturer at the University of California, Riverside.     

A new mark test for mirror self-recognition in non-human primates

For 30 years Gallups (Science 167:86–87, 1970) mark test, which consists of confronting a mirror-experienced test animal with its own previously altered mirror image, usually a color mark on forehead, eyebrow or ear, has delivered valuable results about the distribution of visual self-recognition in non-human primates. Chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and, less frequently, gorillas can learn to correctly understand the reflection of their body in a mirror. However, the standard version of the mark test is good only for positively proving the existence of self-recognition. Conclusive statements about the lack of self-recognition are more difficult because of the methodological constraints of the test. This situation has led to a persistent controversy about the power of Gallups original technique. We devised a new variant of the test which permits more unequivocal decisions about both the presence and absence of self-recognition. This new procedure was tested with marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus), following extensive training with mirror-related tasks to facilitate performance in the standard mark test. The results show that a slightly altered mark test with a new marking substance (chocolate cream) can help to reliably discriminate between true negative results, indicating a real lack of ability to recognize oneself in a mirror, from false negative results that are due to methodological particularities of the standard test. Finally, an evolutionary hypothesis is put forward as to why many primates can use a mirror instrumentally – i.e. know how to use it for grasping at hidden objects – while failing in the decisive mark test.To see a video sequence of the instrumental use of mirror by Callithrix jacchus as described in this study, please go to     

Mark tests for mirror self-recognition in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) trained to touch marks

In Experiment 1, three capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were exposed to a mirror in their home cage for 3 days and then given food treats for touching orange marks located on the surface of an experimental chamber. Following training, a mirror was added to the chamber to see if the monkeys would use it to guide non-reinforced contacts with an orange mark on their foreheads that was only visible as a mirror reflection (mark test). Two monkeys touched the head-mark more often with the mirror present than absent, but no mark touches were emitted while looking at the mirror. In Experiment 2, the monkeys were rewarded for touching orange marks on their bodies that were directly visible, followed by another head-mark test. Again, two monkeys touched the mark more often with the mirror present than absent, but these contacts were not emitted while looking at the mirror. Since facing the mirror while mark touching was not required for reinforcement during training, Experiment 3 further tested the possibility that increased mark touching in the presence of the mirror during Experiments 1 and 2 was the result of a memorial process. For this, a final, novel mark test was conducted using an orange mark on the neck that was only visible as a reflection (Experiment 3). No monkeys passed this test. These are the first mark tests given to capuchin monkeys. The results are consistent with the finding that no monkey species is capable of spontaneous mirror self-recognition. The implications of sequential training and mark testing for comparative evaluations of mirror self-recognition capacity are discussed.     

What mirror self-recognition in nonhumans can tell us about aspects of self

Research on mirror self-recognition where animals are observed for mirror-guided self-directed behaviour has predominated the empirical approach to self-awareness in nonhuman primates. The ability to direct behaviour to previously unseen parts of the body such as the inside of the mouth, or grooming the eye by aid of mirrors has been interpreted as recognition of self and evidence of a self-concept. Three decades of research has revealed that contrary to monkeys, most great apes (humans, common chimpanzees, pygmy chimpanzees and orangutans but not the gorilla) have convincingly displayed the capacity to recognize self by mirrors. The putative discontinuity in phylogeny of the ability suggests the existence of a so-called cognitive gap between great apes and the rest of the animal kingdom. However, methodological and theoretical inconsistencies regarding the empirical approach prevail. For instance, the observation of self-directed behaviour might not be as straightforward as it seems. In addition, the interpretation of mirror self-recognition as an index of self-awareness is challenged by alternative explanations, raising doubt about some assumptions behind mirror self-recognition. To evaluate the significance of the test in discussions of the concept of self this paper presents and analyses some major arguments raised on the mirror task.     

Not all chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-recognition

When a chimpanzee is presented with a mirror it initially responds with social behavior directed toward the reflection. After several hours of exposure to the mirror the social behavior decreases and the mirror is used to guide self-directed responses to previously unobservable parts of the body such as the face. When a distinctively colored mark is unobtrousively applied to the chimpanzee's face and the chimpanzee touches the mark while observing itself in the mirror, this behavior is said to indicate self-recognition. Such self-recognition has been considered to be a robust phenomenon in chimpanzees, with self-directed and mark-directed behaviors both appearing in all socially-housed adult chimpanzees tested. In our study 11 chimpanzees were given mirror exposure and tested with the mark test. Only one of the 11 chimpanzees touched the mark during test, although several showed self-directed behavior using the mirror to guide their movements. Such experimental factors as mirror size, position, or temporal spacing of the mirror exposure, and such subject variables as age, sex, previous social experience, and subspecies were insufficient to explain the difference between the present and previous findings. We suggest that there are individual differences in mirror recognition behavior in chimpanzees, and that further consideration of the factors contributing to this phenomenon, including the development of additional tests for self-recognition, is needed.     

The outer membrane TolC is involved in cysteine tolerance and overproduction in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

l-Cysteine is an important amino acid in terms of its industrial applications. We previously found marked production of l-cysteine directly from glucose in recombinant Escherichia coli cells by the combination of enhancing biosynthetic activity and weakening the degradation pathway. Further improvements in l-cysteine production are expected to use the amino acid efflux system. Here, we identified a novel gene involved in l-cysteine export using a systematic and comprehensive collection of gene-disrupted E. coli K-12 mutants (the Keio collection). Among the 3,985 nonessential gene mutants, tolC-disrupted cells showed hypersensitivity to l-cysteine relative to wild-type cells. Gene expression analysis revealed that the tolC gene encoding the outer membrane channel is essential for l-cysteine tolerance in E. coli cells. However, l-cysteine tolerance is not mediated by TolC-dependent drug efflux systems such as AcrA and AcrB. It also appears that other outer membrane porins including OmpA and OmpF do not participate in TolC-dependent l-cysteine tolerance. When a low-copy-number plasmid carrying the tolC gene was introduced into E. coli cells with enhanced biosynthesis, weakened degradation, and improved export of l-cysteine, the transformants exhibited more l-cysteine tolerance and production than cells carrying the vector only. We concluded that TolC plays an important role in l-cysteine tolerance probably due to its export ability and that TolC overexpression is effective for l-cysteine production in E. coli. Natthawut Wiriyathanawudhiwong and Iwao Ohtsu contributed equally to this work.