Functional Evolution of Phosphatidylethanolamine Binding Proteins in Soybean and Arabidopsis

Gene duplication provides resources for novel gene functions. Identification of the amino acids responsible for functional conservation and divergence of duplicated genes will strengthen our understanding of their evolutionary course. Here, we conducted a systemic functional investigation of phosphatidylethanolamine binding proteins (PEBPs) in soybean (Glycine max) and Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results demonstrated that after the ancestral duplication, the lineage of the common ancestor of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) subfamilies functionally diverged from the MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT) subfamily to activate flowering and repress flowering, respectively. They also underwent further specialization after subsequent duplications. Although the functional divergence increased with duplication age, we observed rapid functional divergence for a few pairs of young duplicates in soybean. Association analysis between amino acids and functional variations identified critical amino acid residues that led to functional differences in PEBP members. Using transgenic analysis, we validated a subset of these differences. We report clear experimental evidence for the functional evolution of the PEBPs in the MFT, FT, and TFL1 subfamilies, which predate the origin of angiosperms. Our results highlight the role of amino acid divergence in driving evolutionary novelty after duplication.     

BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT), a member of the FT/TFL1 family,shows distinct pattern of expression during the vegetative growth of Arabidopsis

Transition to the flowering stage is precisely controlled by a few classes of regulatory molecules. BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT) is a member of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family, an important class of flower development regulators with unidentified biochemical function. BFT has a TFL1-like activity and plays a role in axillary inflorescence development. To elucidate the expression pattern of BFT, we analyzed the subcellular localization and conditional expression of BFT in this study. We generated 35S::BFT:GFP plants to investigate the subcellular localization of BFT protein. 35S::BFT:GFP plants showed late flowering, similarly as did 35S::BFT plants. BFT:GFP fusion protein was localized in the nucleus and the plasma membrane, which was different from the localization pattern of FT and TFL1. BFT expression was induced by abiotic stress conditions. ABA, drought, and osmotic stress treatments induced BFT expression, whereas cold, salt, and heat stress conditions did not, suggesting that BFT plays a role in regulating flowering time and inflorescence structure under drought conditions. The induction pattern of BFT was different from those of other FT/TFL1 family genes. Our studies indicated that BFT showed a distinct expression pattern from its homologous genes during the vegetative growth in Arabidopsis.Key words: flowering time, flowering locus T, terminal flower 1, brother of FT and TFL1, abiotic stress, subcellullar localizationThe FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family is a small gene family whose members play a pivotal role in flower development in Arabidopsis. The family includes FT, TFL1, TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), Arabidopsis thaliana CENTRORADIALIS homologue (ATC), MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT) and BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT).^{3,5,6,9,15,17} FT is a floral promoter that integrates signal inputs from various pathways that regulate flowering time in Arabidopsis.^5,6 TFL1 plays an antagonistic role to that of FT, functioning as a floral inhibitor. Unlike FT, TFL1 also plays an important role in controlling plant architecture by regulating the expression of LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), two important floral meristem identity genes in the shoot apical meristem (SAM).^3,7 TSF regulates flowering by a mechanism similar to that of FT, although a lesion in TSF does not have an apparent effect on the determination of flowering time. MFT has a weak FT-like activity.¹⁷ ATC acts as a floral repressor, and its role is similar to that of TFL1.⁹ Finally, BFT has a TFL1-like activity, in spite of its amino acid homology to FT,^2,4,16 and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development in Arabidopsis.¹⁶ Although genetic studies elucidated an intricate role of the FT/TFL1 family genes, not much is known about the expression pattern of the remaining members except FT and TFL1. Here, we report that BFT expression showed a distinct pattern from its homologous genes during the vegetative phase. BFT:GFP fusion protein was detected in the nucleus and the plasma membrane. BFT expression was induced by abiotic stress conditions, distinct from other FT/TFL1 family genes, raising the possibility that BFT plays a role in regulating flowering time and inflorescence structure under drought conditions.     

Cloning and Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T-Like Genes from the Perennial Geophyte Saffron Crocus (Crocus sativus)

The transition to flowering is one of the most important developmental decisions made by plants. At the molecular level, many genes coordinate this transition. Among these, genes encoding for phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins (PEBPs) play important roles in regulating flower time and the fate of inflorescence meristem. To investigate the role of PEBPs in an industrially important crop cultivated for its nutritional and medicinal properties, the monocotyledonous species Crocus sativus L., we have isolated three FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)-like genes designated as CsatFT1-like, CsatFT2-like, and CsatFT3-like. The isolated genes maintain the exon/intron organization of FT-like genes and encode proteins similar to the members of the PEBP family. Phylogenetic and amino acid analysis at critical positions confirmed that the isolated sequence belongs to the FT clade of the PEBP family phylogeny distinctly from the TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 clades. Expression analysis indicated differences in the expression of the three FT-like genes in different organs and different expressions during the day–night diurnal clock. Additionally, analysis of isolated promoter sequences using computational methods reveals the preservation of common binding motifs in FT-like promoters from other species, thus suggesting their importance among plant species.     

The FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 family in Lombardy poplar

Genes in the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1)family have been shown to be important in the control of theswitch between vegetative and reproductive growth in severalplant species. We isolated nine members of the FT/TFL1 familyfrom Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra var. italica Koehne). Sequenceanalysis of the members of the FT/TFL1 family revealed considerablehomology within their coding regions both among family membersand to the members of the same family in Arabidopsis, tomatoand grapevine. Moreover, members of this family in all fourspecies examined display a common exon–intron organization.Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the genes fall into fourdifferent clades: two into the TFL1 clade; five into the FTclade; and one each into the MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 and BROTHEROF FT AND TFL1 clades. One gene in the TFL1 clade, PnTFL1, isexpressed in vegetative meristems, and transgenic Arabidopsisthat ectopically expressed PnTFL1 had a late-flowering phenotype.The expression patterns of two genes in the FT clade, PnFT1and PnFT2, suggested a role for them in the promotion of flowering,and transgenic Arabidopsis that ectopically expressed eitherPnFT1 or PnFT2 had an early-flowering phenotype.     

BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT) has TFL1‐like activity and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development in Arabidopsis

The FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family is a small gene family that encodes important regulators that control flower development in Arabidopsis. Here, we investigated the biological role of the product of BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT), a member of this family, whose function remains unknown. Comparison of the critical residues that play a role in distinguishing FT‐ or TFL1‐like activity revealed that BFT is more similar to FT. Similar to FT expression, BFT expression showed a diurnal oscillation pattern, peaking in the evening. In situ hybridization revealed BFT expression in the shoot apical meristem, young leaf and axillary inflorescence meristem. Transgenic plants over‐expressing BFT exhibited delayed flowering and severe floral defects (floral indeterminacy and compact inflorescences surrounded by serrate leaves), similar to 35S::TFL1 plants. LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) expression was significantly reduced in 35S::BFT plants. BFT over‐expression failed to rescue the terminal flower phenotype of tfl1 mutants; however, it delayed both terminal flower formation in the primary inflorescence and axillary inflorescence development in the tfl1 mutant background. Consistent with this, the loss‐of‐function BFT alleles, bft‐2 and an BFT RNAi line, accelerated termination of the primary inflorescence and formation of axillary inflorescences in the tfl1 mutant background. Taken together, our results suggest that, despite similarities in the critical residues of BFT and FT, BFT possesses a TFL1‐like activity and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development, and possibly contributes to the regulation of plant architecture.     

CONSTANS delays Arabidopsis flowering under short days

Long days (LD) promote flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana compared with short days (SD) by activating the photoperiodic pathway. Here we show that growth under very‐SD (3 h) or darkness (on sucrose) also accelerates flowering on a biological scale, indicating that SD actively repress flowering compared with very‐SD. CONSTANS (CO) repressed flowering under SD, and the early flowering of co under SD required FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). FT was expressed at a basal level in the leaves under SD, but these levels were not enhanced in co. This indicates that the action of CO in A. thaliana is not the mirror image of the action of its homologue in rice. In the apex, CO enhanced the expression of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) around the time when FT expression is important to promote flowering. Under SD, the tfl1 mutation was epistatic to co and in turn ft was epistatic to tfl1. These observations are consistent with the long‐standing but not demonstrated model where CO can inhibit FT induction of flowering by affecting TFL1 expression.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">FT/TFL1</Emphasis> gene family in grapevine

The FT/TFL1 gene family encodes proteins with similarity to phosphatidylethanolamine binding proteins which function as flowering promoters and repressors. We show here that the FT/TFL1 gene family in Vitis vinifera is composed of at least five genes. Sequence comparisons with homologous genes identified in other dicot species group them in three major clades, the FT, MFT and TFL1 subfamilies, the latter including three of the Vitis sequences. Gene expression patterns are in agreement with a role of VvFT and VvMFT as flowering promoters; while VvTFL1A, VvTFL1B and VvTFL1C could be associated with vegetative development and maintenance of meristem indetermination. Overexpression of VvFT in transgenic Arabidopsis plants generates early flowering phenotypes similar to those produced by FT supporting a role for this gene in flowering promotion. Overexpression of VvTFL1A does not affect flowering time but the determination of flower meristems, strongly altering inflorescence structure, which is consistent with the biological roles assigned to similar genes in other species.     

Genetic interactions reveal the antagonistic roles of FT/TSF and TFL1 in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity in Arabidopsis

During the transition to the reproductive phase, the shoot apical meristem switches from the developmental program that generates vegetative organs to instead produce flowers. In this study, we examined the genetic interactions of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity in Arabidopsis thaliana. The ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants produced a compact inflorescence surrounded by serrated leaves (hyper‐vegetative shoot) at the early bolting stage, as did plants overexpressing TFL1. Plants overexpressing FT or TSF (or both FT and TFL1) generated a terminal flower, as did tfl1‐20 mutants. The terminal flower formed in tfl1‐20 mutants converted to a hyper‐vegetative shoot in ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants. Grafting ft‐10 tsf‐1 or ft‐10 tsf‐1 tfl1‐20 mutant scions to 35S::FT rootstock plants produced a normal inflorescence and a terminal flower in the scion plants, respectively, although both scions showed similar early flowering. Misexpression of FT in the vasculature and in the shoot apex in wild‐type plants generated a normal inflorescence and a terminal flower, respectively. By contrast, in ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants the vasculature‐specific misexpression of FT converted the hyper‐vegetative shoot to a normal inflorescence, and in the ft‐10 tsf‐1 tfl1‐20 mutants converted the shoot to a terminal flower. TFL1 levels did not affect the inflorescence morphology caused by FT/TSF overexpression at the early bolting stage. Taking these results together, we proposed that FT/TSF and TFL1 play antagonistic roles in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity, and that FT/TSF are more important than TFL1 in this process.     

Terminal flower2, an Arabidopsis homolog of heterochromatin protein1, counteracts the activation of flowering locus T by constans in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time

The flowering time of plants is tightly regulated by both promotive and repressive factors. Molecular genetic studies using Arabidopsis have identified several epigenetic repressors that regulate flowering time. Terminal flower2, (TFL2), which encodes a homolog of heterochromatin protein1 represses flowering locus T (FT) expression, which is induced by the activator constans (CO) in response to the long-day signal. Here, we show that TFL2, CO, and FT are expressed together in leaf vascular tissues and that TFL2 represses FT expression continuously throughout development. Mutations in TFL2 derepress FT expression within the vascular tissues of leaves, resulting in daylength-independent early flowering. TFL2 can reduce FT expression even when CO is overexpressed. However, FT expression reaches a level sufficient for floral induction even in the presence of TFL2, suggesting that TFL2 does not maintain FT in a silent state or inhibit it completely; rather, it counteracts the effect of CO on FT activation.     

The flowering-time geneFT and regulation of flowering inArabidopsis

Transition from vegetative to reproductive development (flowering) is one of the most important decisions during the post-embryonic development of flowering plants. More than twenty loci are known to regulate this process inArabidopsis. Some of these flowering-time genes may act at the shoot apical meristem to regulate its competence to respond to floral inductive signals and floral evocation. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of mutants suggest that the late-flowering geneFT may be a good candidate for such genes. To test this, we have cloned theFT gene using aFT-deficiency line associated with a T-DNA insertion. Cloned genes and loss-of-function mutants in hand, it is now possible to analyse the role ofFT and other genes in flowering at the biochemical and cellular levels as well as at the genetic level. The deduced FT protein has homology with TFL1 and CEN proteins believed to be involved in regulation of inflorescence meristem identity. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that theFT group and theTFL1/CEN group of genes diverged before the diversification of major angiosperm clades. This raises the interesting question of the evolutionary relationship between the regulation of vegetative/reproductive switching in the shoot apical meristem and the regulation of inflorescence architecture in angiosperms. The extended abstract of a paper presented at the 13th International Symposium in Conjugation with Award of the International Prize for Biology “Fronitier of Plant Biology”     

Molecular cloning and expression analyses of FaFT,FaTFL, and FaAP1 genes in cultivated strawberry: their correlation to flower bud formation

In this study, we cloned flowering-related genes FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) from domesticated octaploid strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) and analyzed their expression patterns in cultivars Tochiotome and Akihime. The floral meristem generation was induced under the short day and low temperature (SDLT), but not under the long day and high temperature (LDHT). We found that FaFT1, which is an orthologue of the Arabidopsis floral activator FT, was highly expressed in leaves under LDHT but not expressed in leaves under SDLT. On the other hand, the expression of FaTFL2, which belongs to the TFL1 family of flowering repressing genes, decreased in crowns (stem tissue including meristem) under SDLT. These results suggest that FaTFL2, as opposed to FvTFL1 in wild diploid strawberry Fragaria vesca, is related to flowering of the cultivated strawberry. Moreover, the FaTFL2 expression might be regulated by temperature rather than by photoperiod. We demonstrated that a reduction of the FaTFL2 expression is a key signal for flowering in domesticated strawberries.     

Florigen is involved in axillary bud development at multiple stages in Arabidopsis

The wide variety of plant architectures is largely based on diverse and flexible modes of axillary shoot development. In Arabidopsis, floral transition (flowering) stimulates axillary bud development. The mechanism that links flowering and axillary bud development is, however, largely unknown. We recently showed that FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) protein, which acts as florigen, promotes the phase transition of axillary meristems, whereas BRANCHED1 (BRC1) antagonizes the florigen action in axillary buds. Here, we present evidences for another possible role of florigen in axillary bud development. Ectopic overexpression of FT or another florigen gene TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) with LEAFY (LFY) induces ectopic buds at cotyledonary axils, confirming the previous proposal that these genes are involved in formation of axillary buds. Taken together with our previous report that florigen promotes axillary shoot elongation, we propose that florigen regulates axillary bud development at multiple stages to coordinate it with flowering in Arabidopsis.     

EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 7 (ESD7) encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon and is required for flowering repression through a mechanism involving epigenetic gene silencing

We have characterized a mutation affecting the Arabidopsis EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 7 (ESD7) gene encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon (ε), AtPOL2a. The esd7‐1 mutation causes early flowering independently of photoperiod, shortened inflorescence internodes and altered leaf and root development. esd7‐1 is a hypomorphic allele whereas knockout alleles displayed an embryo‐lethal phenotype. The esd7 early flowering phenotype requires functional FT and SOC1 proteins and might also be related to the misregulation of AG and AG‐like gene expression found in esd7. Genes involved in the modulation of chromatin structural dynamics, such as LHP1/TFL2 and EBS, which negatively regulate FT expression, were found to interact genetically with ESD7. In fact a molecular interaction between the carboxy terminus of ESD7 and TFL2 was demonstrated in vitro. Besides, fas2 mutations suppressed the esd7 early flowering phenotype and ICU2 was found to interact with ESD7. Discrete regions of the chromatin of FT and AG loci were enriched in activating epigenetic marks in the esd7‐1 mutant. We concluded that ESD7 might be participating in processes involved in chromatin‐mediated cellular memory.