Alien DNA introgression and wheat DNA rearrangements in a stable wheat line derived from the early generation of distant hybridization

In general, it requires five or more generations to develop a stable line by the traditional breeding method of cultivar hybrids in self-pollinated crops, such as wheat, barley, and rice. No doubt, the breeding period will be shortened and thus the breeding effi-ciency will be improved if the hybrids can stabilize in early generation. The method of haploid breeding, that is, obtaining stable pure lines (DH lines) of cultivar hybrids with the aid of anther culture and then chro-mosome doubling,…     

Alien DNA introgression and wheat DNA rearrangements in a stable wheat line derived from the early generation of distant hybridization

Polyploidy has been found to be common in plants. Bread or common wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n=42) is a good example of allopolyploid made up of three diploid genomes A, B and D. In recent years, by the study of mimicking the origination of common wheat, it was found that changes of DNA sequence and gene expression occurred at the early stages of artificial allohexaploid between tetraploid wheat and Aegilops tauschii, which was probably favorable to genetic diploidization of new synthetic hexaploid wheat. Common wheat 99L2 is a new line stable in genetic, which was derived from the early self-pollinated generation of wide hybrids between common wheat and rye. In this study, it was found that at least two rye DNA segments had been introgressed into 99L2. This result suggested that a mechanism of alien DNA introgression may exist, which was different from the traditional mechanism of chromosome pairing and DNA recombination between wheat and alien species. Meanwhile, during the introgression process of alien rye DNA segments, the changes in DNA sequences of wheat itself occurred.     

Interaction between rye B-chromosomes and wheat genetic systems controlling homoeologous pairing

The interactive effect on homoeologous pairing of rye B-chromosomes with the absence of both pairing suppressor (3A, 3D, 5B) and promotor (3B, 5A, 5D) chromosomes of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is analyzed by comparison of pairing at Metaphase I of 27-, 27+2B, 28- and 28+2B-chromosome plants. These plants were obtained from crosses between the respective wheat monosomics (2n=41) and rye plants (Secale cereale L.) carrying or not carrying two B-chromosomes (2n=14 or 14+2Bs). —The effect of rye B-chromosomes on pairing depends on the function of the wheat chromosome which is absent in the appropriate hybrids, i.e., rye B-chromosomes have a suppressor effect on pairing when the pairing suppressing wheat chromosomes 3A, 3D or 5B are absent, while they behave as promotors when the pairing promoting chromosomes 3B, 5A or 5D are absent.     

The influence of rye cytoplasm on meiotic stability of tetraploid Secalotriticum

Chromosome pairing in tetraploid Secalotriticum was analysed. In the studied plants wheat chromosomes in PMCs during metaphase I showed a higher degree of pairing, in comparison to the rye genome. This is reflected in a very low frequency of univalents and a higher frequency of ring bivalents. The occurrence of wheat univalents was dependent on wheat mixogenome. In plants with an unstabilized fourth homoeologous group, a heteromorphic bivalent 4A-4B was observed in 39.9% of PMCs, whereas in plants with an unstabilized seventh homoeologous group, chromosome 7A-7B pairing was found in all analysed cells. Rye univalents were present in all plants studied. The highest mean frequency of univalents and rod bivalents, both in wheat and in rye genomes, were recorded in plants whose first homoeologous group contained chromosome 1A. The mean number of terminal chiasmata per chromosome amounted to 1.78 in the wheat genome and 1.36 in the rye genome. It may be concluded that the plasmagenes in Secalotriticum did not increase the meiotic stability of the rye genome and also did not stabilize plant fertility.     

An early meiosis cDNA clone from wheat

Meiosis occupies only a very short period of the life cycle of higher plants but it is a crucial process ensuring the correct passage and maintenance of genetic information from parent to offspring. A clone (designated pAWJL3) has been isolated from a cDNA library generated from RNA prepared from young wheat florets at early meiosis. The clone was identified through cross-hybridisation to a cDNA clone from maize that, in turn, had been isolated by hybridisation to a Lilium meiosis-specific cDNA clone. The genes encoding the sequence represented in the wheat cDNA clone have been assigned to chromosomes in wheat. The clone, pAWJL3, represents a small family of genes with about 20 members located on the short arms of group 3 and 5 chromosomes. The chromosomal regions harbour genes known to control chromosomal pairing in wheat. DNA prepared from a deletion mutation affecting one of the major genes controlling pairing, Ph2 located on the short arm of 3DS, lacks the 3DS-specific members of the pAWJL3 family bands. The genes are shown to be expressed only after leptotene and predominantly at zygotene and pachytene of meiosis I. The deduced amino acid sequence encoded by the cDNA clone shows two domains, one with three leucine-rich, 24-amino acid repeats and the other with four leucine heptad repeats that resemble those found in basic leucine zipper proteins.     

Terminal regions of wheat chromosomes select their pairing partners in meiosis

Many plant species, including important crops like wheat, are polyploids that carry more than two sets of genetically related chromosomes capable of meiotic pairing. To safeguard a diploid-like behavior at meiosis, many polyploids evolved genetic loci that suppress incorrect pairing and recombination of homeologues. The Ph1 locus in wheat was proposed to ensure homologous pairing by controlling the specificity of centromere associations that precede chromosome pairing. Using wheat chromosomes that carry rye centromeres, we show that the centromere associations in early meiosis are not based on homology and that the Ph1 locus has no effect on such associations. Although centromeres indeed undergo a switch from nonhomologous to homologous associations in meiosis, this process is driven by the terminally initiated synapsis. The centromere has no effect on metaphase I chiasmate chromosome associations: homologs with identical or different centromeres, in the presence and absence of Ph1, pair the same. A FISH analysis of the behavior of centromeres and distal chromomeres in telocentric and bi-armed chromosomes demonstrates that it is not the centromeric, but rather the subtelomeric, regions that are involved in the correct partner recognition and selection.     

phlb基因诱导小麦ABD染色体组部分同源染色体配对的研究

通过花药培养首次获得了“中国春”phlb突变体单倍体,同时也获得了“中国春”单倍体。对其细胞学观察表明,前者花粉母细胞减数分裂中期Ⅰ每个细胞染色体交叉为5.08个,后者为1.30个。证明了phlb基因在单倍体状态下具有强的诱导ABD染色体组部分同源染色体间的配对作用。     

Nuclear architecture and chromosome dynamics in the search of the pairing partner in meiosis in plants

The formation of haploid gametes in organisms with sexual reproduction requires regular bivalent chromosome pairing in meiosis. In many species, homologous chromosomes occupy separate territories at the onset of meiosis. To be paired at metaphase I, they need to be brought into a close proximity for interactions that include homology recognition and the establishment of some form of bonds. How homologues find each other is one of the least understood meiotic events. Plant species with large or medium sized genomes, such as wheat or maize, are excellent materials for the cytological analysis of chromosome dynamics at early meiosis, but genes that control meiosis have been identified mainly in small genome species such as Arabidopsis thaliana. This review is focused on the contribution studies on plants are providing to the knowledge of the initial steps of the meiotic process.     

Dynamics of DNA Replication during Premeiosis and Early Meiosis in Wheat

Meiosis is a specialised cell division that involves chromosome replication, two rounds of chromosome segregation and results in the formation of the gametes. Meiotic DNA replication generally precedes chromosome pairing, recombination and synapsis in sexually developing eukaryotes. In this work, replication has been studied during premeiosis and early meiosis in wheat using flow cytometry, which has allowed the quantification of the amount of DNA in wheat anther in each phase of the cell cycle during premeiosis and each stage of early meiosis. Flow cytometry has been revealed as a suitable and user-friendly tool to detect and quantify DNA replication during early meiosis in wheat. Chromosome replication was detected in wheat during premeiosis and early meiosis until the stage of pachytene, when chromosomes are associated in pairs to further recombine and correctly segregate in the gametes. In addition, the effect of the Ph1 locus, which controls chromosome pairing and affects replication in wheat, was also studied by flow cytometry. Here we showed that the Ph1 locus plays an important role on the length of meiotic DNA replication in wheat, particularly affecting the rate of replication during early meiosis in wheat.     

异细胞质中国春小麦与八倍体小偃麦杂交的细胞遗传研究

用5个异细胞质“中国春小麦”分别和八倍体小偃麦中_2、中_3,中_5杂交。F_1植株性状为两亲的中间型。D型细胞质和B型细胞质的作用基本相同。S型和G型细胞质严重影响F_1的育性,但二者表现不同,S型细胞质仅削弱花粉育性,而G型细胞质使有些杂交组合的F_1雄性完全不育。在中_3、中_5核基因组中存在G型细胞质雄性不育的育性恢复基因。M~t型细胞质可使所有杂交组合F_1植株大型化和抽穗期延长10—15天。此外,细胞遗传学分析表明,M~t型细胞质能促进同源染色体配对,而G型细胞质则促进部分同源染色体配对。G型细胞质对花粉母细胞减数分裂Ⅱ影响较大,产生许多异常四分体,最终引起雄性不育。上述杂交组合经连续回交,已育成异细胞质的八倍体小偃麦品系。     

Fluorescence in situ hybridization with multiple repeated DNA probes applied to the analysis of wheat-rye chromosome pairing

 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with multiple probes has been applied to meiotic chromosome spreads derived from ph1b common wheat x rye hybrid plants. The probes used included pSc74 and pSc 119.2 from rye (the latter also hybridizes on wheat, mainly B genome chromosomes), the Ae. squarrosa pAs1 probe, which hybridizes almost exclusively on D genome chromosomes, and wheat rDNA probes pTa71 and pTa794. Simultaneous and sequential FISH with a two-by-two combination of these probes allowed unequivocal identification of all of the rye (R) and most of the wheat (W) chromosomes, either unpaired or involved in pairing. Thus not only could wheat-wheat and wheat-rye associations be easily discriminated, which was already feasible by the sole use of the rye-specific pSc74 probe, but the individual pairing partners could also be identified. Of the wheat-rye pairing observed, which averaged from about 7% to 11% of the total pairing detected in six hybrid plants of the same cross combination, most involved B genome chromosomes (about 70%), and to a much lesser degree, those of the D (almost 17%) and A (14%) genomes. Rye arms 1RL and 5RL showed the highest pairing frequency (over 30%), followed by 2RL (11%) and 4RL (about 8%), with much lower values for all the other arms. 2RS and 5RS were never observed to pair in the sample analysed. Chromosome arms 1RL, 1RS, 2RL, 3RS, 4RS and 6RS were observed to be exclusively bound to wheat chromosomes of the same homoeologous group. The opposite was true for 4RL (paired with 6BS and 7BS) and 6RL (paired with 7BL). 5RL, on the other hand, paired with 4WL arms or segments of them in more than 80% of the cases and with 5WL in the remaining ones. Additional cases of pairing involving wheat chromosomes belonging to more than one homoeologous group occurred with 3RL, 7RS and 7RL. These results, while adding support to previous evidence about the existence of several translocations in the rye genome relative to that of wheat, show that FISH with multiple probes is an efficient method by which to study fundamental aspects of chromosome behaviour at meiosis, such as interspecific pairing. The type of knowledge attainable from this approach is expected to have a significant impact on both theoretical and applied research concerning wheat and related Triticeae. Received: 21 February 1996 / Accepted: 12 July 1996     

Induced Homoeologous Pairing for Transfer of Useful Variability for High Grain Fe and Zn from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aegilops kotschyi</Emphasis> into Wheat

Biofortification of bread wheat by the transfer of useful variability of high grain Fe and Zn from Aegilops kotschyi through induced homoeologous pairing is the most feasible approach to alleviate micronutrient malnutrition worldwide. Deficiency of chromosome 5B in interspecific hybrids allows homoeologous pairing and recombination of chromosomes of wheat with those of the related species. The interspecific hybrid plants without 5B chromosome showed much higher chromosome pairing than did the plants with 5B. The F₁ plants without 5B chromosome were selected and repeatedly backcrossed with wheat cultivar PBW343. The chromosome number of BC₂F₁ plants ranged from 43 to 60 with several univalents and multivalents. Molecular markers and GISH analysis confirmed the introgression of U/S chromosomes of Ae. kotschyi and their fragments in wheat. The BC₂F₂ plants showed up to 125 % increase in Fe and 158 % increase in Zn compared to PBW343 with Lr24 and Yr36. Induced homoeologous pairing in the absence of 5B was found to be an effective approach for transfer of useful variability for enhanced grain Fe and Zn content for biofortification of wheat for high grain micronutrient content.     

Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis

Reports of centromere pairing in early meiotic cells have appeared sporadically over the past thirty years. Recent experiments demonstrate that early centromere pairing occurs between non-homologous centromeres. As meiosis proceeds, centromeres change partners, becoming arranged in homologous pairs. Investigations of these later centromere pairs indicate that paired homologous centromeres are actively associated rather than positioned passively, side-by-side. Meiotic centromere pairing has been observed in organisms as diverse as mice, wheat and yeast, indicating that non-homologous centromere pairing in early meiosis and active homologous centromere pairing in later meiosis might be themes in meiotic chromosome behavior. Moreover, such pairing could have previously unrecognized roles in mediating chromosome organization or architecture that impact meiotic segregation fidelity.     

Suppression of Homoeologous Pairing by <Emphasis Type="Italic">B</Emphasis> Chromosomes in a <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lolium</Emphasis> Species Hybrid

INTERSPECIFIC hybridization together with polyploidy has been an important force in the evolution of many of our graminaceous crop plants. Both wheat (Triticum aestivum) and oats (Avena sativa), for example, are natural allohexaploids derived in each case from the hybridization of three separate but related diploid species. The efforts of plant breeders to synthesize stable and fertile polyploids of this kind have, on the whole, been unsuccessful. The main reason for this is that whereas meiosis in natural allopolyploids such as wheat is extremely regular this is not the case with “synthetic” polyploids. In wheat precise control over pairing at meiosis is achieved by a gene or a cluster of genes on chromosome SB. The gene acts by restricting the pairing to homologous chromosomes with the result that only bivalents are formed, disjunction is regular and inheritance is completely disomic^1,2. In the artificial polyploids at pachytene there is pairing between both homologous chromosomes (from the same species) and “corresponding” homoeologous chromosomes (from different species). The result is an extremely irregular metaphase 1 comprising multivalents and univalents as well as bivalents. Segregation is irregular and a certain degree of infertility is inevitable.     

The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants

Three activities hallmark meiotic cell division: homologous chromosome pairing, synapsis, and recombination. Recombination and synapsis are well-studied but homologous pairing still holds many black boxes. In the past several years, many studies in plants have yielded insights into the mechanisms of chromosome pairing interactions. Research in several plant species showed the importance of telomere clustering on the nuclear envelope (telomere bouquet formation) in facilitating alignment of homologous chromosomes. Homologous pairing was also shown to be tied to the early stages of recombination by mutant analyses in Arabidopsis and maize. In contrast, little is known about the mechanisms that guide homolog interaction after their rough alignment by the bouquet and before the close-range recombination-dependent homology search. The relatively large and complex genomes of plants may require additional mechanisms, not needed in small genome eukaryotes, to distinguish between local homology of duplicated genes or transposable elements and global chromosomal homology. Plants provide an excellent large genome model for the study of homologous pairing and dissection of this process.     

Origin,evolution and genome differentiation in Guizotia abyssinica and its wild species

Summary Genome affinities were analyzed at meiosis in C-banded metaphase-I cells of wheat x Ae. Sharonensis hybrid plants. The results showed that the most frequent type of pairing occurred between chromosomes of the A and D genomes in all plants, as well as in cells with different numbers of associations. These findings clearly indicated that Ae. Sharonensis can be excluded as the donor of the B genome of wheat.     

Induction and characterization of Ph1 wheat mutants

The cloning of genes for complex traits in polyploid plants that possess large genomes, such as hexaploid wheat, requires an efficient strategy. We present here one such strategy focusing on the homologous pairing suppressor (Ph1) locus of wheat. This locus has been shown to affect both premeiotic and meiotic processes, possibly suggesting a complex control. The strategy combined the identification of lines carrying specific deletions using multiplex PCR screening of fast-neutron irradiated wheat populations with the approach of physically mapping the region in the rice genome equivalent to the deletion to reveal its gene content. As a result, we have located the Ph1 factor controlling the euploid-like level of homologous chromosome pairing to the region between two loci (Xrgc846 and Xpsr150A). These loci are located within 400 kb of each other in the rice genome. By sequencing this region of the rice genome, it should now be possible to define the nature of this factor.     

Inducing chromosome pairing through premature condensation: analysis of wheat interspecific hybrids

At the onset of meiosis, chromosomes first decondense and then condense as the process of recognition and intimate pairing occurs between homologous chromosomes. We show here that okadaic acid, a drug known to induce chromosome condensation, can be introduced into wheat interspecific hybrids prior to meiosis to induce chromosome pairing. This pairing occurs in the presence of the Ph1 locus, which usually suppresses pairing of related chromosomes and which we show here delays condensation. Thus the timing of chromosome condensation during the onset of meiosis is an important factor in controlling chromosome pairing.     

Production and cytogenetics of hybrids of Triticum aestivum x Leymus innovatus

Summary Hybrid plants were obtained between Triticum aestivum (2n=6x=42, AABBDD) and Leymus innovatus (2n=4x=28, JJNN) at a frequency varying from 0.4% to 1.2% of the pollinated florets. Improvement of the embryo culture medium resulted in a higher frequency of embryo rescue. Eight of ten hybrids had the expected chromosome number of 35 (ABDJN). Meiotic analysis indicated that there was no homology between the genomes of the two species. Two hybrids had only 28 chromosomes. Comparison of chromosome pairing between the two types of hybrids suggested that Leymus innovatus carries genes that affect chromosome pairing and behavior. The relatively high occurrence of spontaneous doubling in the meiocytes of these hybrids may indicate that backcrossing of the hybrids to wheat should be possible, although frequent chromosome irregularities observed in the meiocytes of the hybrids may decrease the probability of success of this step, which is essential to the process of gene transfer from L. innovatus to wheat.Contrib. no. 366     

The effect of the wheat Ph1 locus on chromatin organisation and meiotic chromosome pairing analysed by genome painting

The Ph1 locus in wheat influences homo(eo)logous chromosome pairing. We have analysed its effect on the behaviour and morphology of two 5RL rye telosomes in a wheat background, by genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH), using rye genomic DNA as a probe. Our main objective was to study the effect of different alleles of the Ph1 locus on the morphology and behaviour of the rye telosomes in interphase nuclei of tapetal cells and in pollen mother cells at early stages of meiosis. The telosomes, easily detectable at all stages, showed a brightly fluorescing chromomere in the distal region and a constriction in the proximal part. These diagnostic markers enabled us to define the centromere and telomere regions of the rye telosomes. In the presence of functional copies of Ph1, the rye telosomes associated at pre-leptotene, disjoined and reorganised their shape at leptotene, and became fully homologously paired at zygotene – pachytene. In plants without functional alleles (ph1bph1b), the rye telosomes displayed an aberrant morphology, their premeiotic associations were clearly disturbed and their pairing during zygotene and pachytene was reduced and irregular. The Ph1 locus also influenced the behaviour of rye telosomes in the interphase nuclei of tapetal cells: in Ph1Ph1 plants, the rye telosomes occupied distinct, parallel-oriented domains, whereas in tapetal nuclei of ph1bph1b plants they were intermingled with wheat chromosomes and showed a heavily distorted morphology. The results shed new light on the effect of Ph1, and suggest that this locus is involved in chromosome condensation and/or scaffold organisation. Our explanation might account for various apparently contradictory and pleiotropic effects of this locus on both premeiotic associations of homologues, the regulation of meiotic homo(eo)logous chromosome pairing and synapsis, the resolution of bivalent interlockings and centromere behaviour. Received: 27 April 1998; in revised form: 5 August 1998 / Accepted: 11 August 1998