The lens: a classical model of embryonic induction providing new insights into cell determination in early development

The lens was the first tissue in which the concept of embryonic induction was demonstrated. For many years lens induction was thought to occur at the time the optic vesicle and lens placode came in contact. Since then, studies have revealed that lens placodal progenitor cells are specified already at gastrula stages, much earlier than previously believed, and independent of optic vesicle interactions. In this review, I will focus on how individual signalling molecules, in particular BMP, FGF, Wnt and Shh, regulate the initial specification of lens placodal cells and the progressive development of lens cells. I will discuss recent work that has shed light on the combination of signalling molecules and the molecular interactions that affect lens specification and proper lens formation. I will also discuss proposed tissue interactions important for lens development. A greater knowledge of the molecular interactions during lens induction is likely to have practical benefits in understanding the causes and consequences of lens diseases. Moreover, knowledge regarding lens induction is providing fundamental important insights into inductive processes in development in general.     

Molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction

The neural crest is an embryonic cell population that originates at the border between the neural plate and the prospective epidermis. Around the time of neural tube closure, neural crest cells emigrate from the neural tube, migrate along defined paths in the embryo and differentiate into a wealth of derivatives. Most of the craniofacial skeleton, the peripheral nervous system, and the pigment cells of the body originate from neural crest cells. This cell type has important clinical relevance, since many of the most common craniofacial birth defects are a consequence of abnormal neural crest development. Whereas the migration and differentiation of the neural crest have been extensively studied, we are just beginning to understand how this tissue originates. The formation of the neural crest has been described as a classic example of embryonic induction, in which specific tissue interactions and the concerted action of signaling pathways converge to induce a multipotent population of neural crest precursor cells. In this review, we summarize the current status of knowledge on neural crest induction. We place particular emphasis on the signaling molecules and tissue interactions involved, and the relationship between neural crest induction, the formation of the neural plate and neural plate border, and the genes that are upregulated as a consequence of the inductive events.     

The chemical nature of the factor responsible for embryonic induction

The discovery by Hans Spemann of the “organizer” tissue and its ability to induce the formation of the amphibian embryo’s neural tube inspired leading embryologists to attempt to elucidate embryonic induction’s underlying mechanisms. Since then several studies have described several developmental model system to better understand the role of specific signaling molecules, the interplay of different signals and tissue interactions in regulating tissue induction and patterning events. Different groups of workers set out to subject embryonic amphibian tissues and inductive adult organs to various extraction methods in the hope that the active agents could be isolated and chemically identified. In addition, a large number of well characterized chemical compounds were tested.     

Induction of the Eye Lens

In general terms embryonic induction involves the association of embryonic tissues and leads to tissue differentiation. It is one of the known essential processes leading to the normal development of embryos. However, despite its importance, very little is known about the mechanisms of inductive interactions. For example, what is the nature of communication between tissues, how does this communication effect the synthetic activity of the cells, and once a new pattern of synthesis has been established how is the sequence of events leading to tissue differentiation co-ordinated? The answers to these questions will come only from the intensive study of inductive interactions and tissue differentiation at all levels from the morphological to the molecular.
One of the best known examples of induction, at least superficially, is the differentiation of lens from head ectoderm after its interaction with optic vesicle. The popularity of this tissue with embryologists may be attributed to its accessibility of manipulation because of its position on the outside of the embryo. In addition, its distinct morphology and specific biochemical composition make it relatively easy to determine whether the lens differentiates after experimental treatment. About the turn of this century lens differentiation was thought to depend on the specific interaction of just two embryonic tissues, head ectoderm and neuro-ectoderm (optic vesicle). However, experimental analysis since then has revealed that this oversimplified view of lens induction is incorrect. In fact there is evidence that a large number of other tissues besides embryonic head ectoderm can differentiate into lens and that other conditions besides the presence of optic vesicle can induce lens differentiation. The purpose of this work is to review the evidence on lens induction and based on this, to determine what we know about the mechanism(s) controlling this process.     

The chemical nature of the factor responsible for embryonic induction: An historical overview

The discovery by Hans Spemann of the “organizer” tissue and its ability to induce the formation of the amphibian embryo’s neural tube inspired leading embryologists to attempt to elucidate embryonic induction’s underlying mechanisms. Since then several studies have described several developmental model system to better understand the role of specific signaling molecules, the interplay of different signals and tissue interactions in regulating tissue induction and patterning events. Different groups of workers set out to subject embryonic amphibian tissues and inductive adult organs to various extraction methods in the hope that the active agents could be isolated and chemically identified. In addition, a large number of well characterized chemical compounds were tested.     

Cell lineage and determination of cell fate in ascidian embryos

A detailed cell lineage of ascidian embryos has been available since the turn of the century. This cell lineage was deduced from the segregation of pigmented egg cytoplasmic regions into particular blastomeres during embryogenesis. The invariant nature of the cell lineage, the segregation of specific egg cytoplasmic regions into particular blastomeres, and the autonomous development of most embryonic cells suggests that cell fate is determined primarily by cytoplasmic determinants. Modern studies have provided strong evidence for the existence of cytoplasmic determinants, especially in the primary muscle cells, yet the molecular identity, localization, and mode of action of these factors are still a mystery. Recent revisions of the classic cell lineage and demonstrations of the lack of developmental autonomy in certain embryonic cells suggest that induction may also be an important mechanism for the determination of cell fate in ascidians. There is strong evidence for the induction of neural tissue and indirect evidence for inductive interactions in the development of the secondary muscle cells. In contrast to the long-accepted dogma, specification of cell fate in ascidians appears to be established by a combination of cytoplasmic determinants and inductive cell interactions.     

Mesd encodes an LRP5/6 chaperone essential for specification of mouse embryonic polarity

Specification of embryonic polarity and pattern formation in multicellular organisms requires inductive signals from neighboring cells. One approach toward understanding these interactions is to study mutations that disrupt development. Here, we demonstrate that mesd, a gene identified in the mesoderm development (mesd) deletion interval on mouse chromosome 7, is essential for specification of embryonic polarity and mesoderm induction. MESD functions in the endoplasmic reticulum as a specific chaperone for LRP5 and LRP6, which in conjunction with Frizzled, are coreceptors for canonical WNT signal transduction. Disruption of embryonic polarity and mesoderm differentiation in mesd-deficient embryos likely results from a primary defect in WNT signaling. However, phenotypic differences between mesd-deficient and wnt3(-)(/)(-) embryos suggest that MESD may function on related members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family, whose members mediate diverse cellular processes ranging from cargo transport to signaling.     

Orchestrating ontogenesis: variations on a theme by sonic hedgehog

Embryonic development is an emergent process in which increasing complexity is generated by sequential cellular interactions. Recently, it has become clear that such interactions are mediated by just a few families of signalling molecules; but how does this limited repertoire elicit the diversity of form that is characteristic of multicellular organisms? Here we review the various ways in which a member of one such family, the sonic hedgehog (SHH) protein, is deployed during embryonic development. These examples of SHH function provide paradigms for inductive interactions that should help to inform attempts to recapitulate cellular programming and organogenesis in vitro.     

To adhere or not to adhere: The role of Cadherins in neural crest development

The modulation of cell adhesion is fundamental to the morphogenesis that accompanies proper embryonic development. Cadherins are a large family of calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules whose spatial and temporal expression is critical to the formation of the neural crest, a unique, multipotent cell type that contributes to the patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Neural crest cells arise from the embryonic ectoderm through inductive interactions and reside in the dorsal aspect of the neural tube. These cells under go an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migrate to precise destinations in the embryo, where they go on to differentiate into such diverse structures as melanocytes, elements of the peripheral nervous system and the craniofacial skeleton. Distinct cadherins are expressed during the induction, migration and differentiation of the neural crest. With the advent of genomic sequencing, assembly and annotation for various model organisms, it has become possible to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying cadherin expression, and how these cadherins function, during neural crest development. This review explores the known roles of cadherins and details, where relevant, how different cadherins are regulated during the formation of the neural crest.Key words: cadherins, neural crest, EMT, induction, migration, differentiation     

Cell Adhesion as a Basis of Pattern in Embryonic Development

The development of the modern methodologies of cell biologyin the fifties and sixties and of molecular biology in the seventiesand eighties has led to a reductionist view of embryonic developmentthat centers on the cell and the gene as the functional unitsof development. The functional units in most inductive and morphogeneticprocesses in the embryo are not single cells, however, but ratherare collectives of interacting cells that give rise to the tissuesand organs. Can these methodological developments reconcilea molecular analysis with the fact that form arises epigeneticallyfrom the increasing number of embryonic cells during development?To answer this question one must link genetic regulation tomechanochemical processes that coordinate cell division, cellmovement and cell death. Recent studies of cell adhesion suggestthat one such link is provided by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)that mediate cell-cell binding. These studies suggest that CAMsare involved in defining cell collectives and their bordersas they interact during inductive events in morphogenesis. AlthoughCAMs cannot be considered the "cause" of induction, they playkey roles among the complex causal chains of inductive interactionsinvolving hormones and growth-factors, extracellular matrixcomponents and cellular receptors. We provide here a brief summaryof modern developments in the field centered about the functionof CAMs in morphogenesis and using recent experimental resultsin the developing feather as a paradigmatic example.     

To adhere or not to adhere

The modulation of cell adhesion is fundamental to the morphogenesis that accompanies proper embryonic development. Cadherins are a large family of calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules whose spatial and temporal expression is critical to the formation of the neural crest, a unique, multipotent cell type that contributes to the patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Neural crest cells arise from the embryonic ectoderm through inductive interactions and reside in the dorsal aspect of the neural tube. These cells under go an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migrate to precise destinations in the embryo, where they go on to differentiate into such diverse structures as melanocytes, elements of the peripheral nervous system, and the craniofacial skeleton. Distinct cadherins are expressed during the induction, migration and differentiation of the neural crest. With the advent of genomic sequencing, assembly and annotation for various model organisms, it has become possible to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying cadherin expression, and how these cadherins function, during neural crest development. This review explores the known roles of cadherins and details, where relevant, how different cadherins are regulated during the formation of the neural crest.     

Cyclic GMP is not involved in neural induction inXenopus laevis

Summary Recent evidence indicates an important role for cell-surface mediated signal transduction in embryonic induction. We, therefore, started a systematic search to identify signal transduction pathways which are activated during embryonic induction and specifically during neural induction. We showed previously that the protein kinase C and cAMP pathways mediate neural induction inXenopus laevis. Here, we investigated whether cGMP is also involved in the early development of the nervous system. We measured the cGMP content of whole embryos at embryonic stages which mark important events in the early development of the nervous system, as well as in the developing neural tissue itself, after this was induced from ectoderm by dorsal mesoderm. No changes in cGMP content were found, either in whole embryos at different developmental stages, or in developing neural tissue from these stages. We also found no evidence for the presence of nitroprusside stimulatable guanylate cyclase in these developmental stages. A cGMP analogue, 8-Br-cGMP, was not able to induce neural tissue, either alone or in combination with known neural inducers, the phorbol ester TPA and 8-Br-cAMP. 8-Br-cGMP also had no negative influence on the neural inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm or TPA, alone or in combination with 8-Br-cAMP. We conclude that cGMP has no role in the early development of the central nervous system inXenopus laevis. This conclusion underlines the specificity of the signal transduction pathways (PKC and cAMP pathways) that do mediate neural induction.     

Induction of tubules in rat metanephrogenic mesenchyme in the absence of an inductive tissue

Differentiation of metanephrogenic mesenchyme to renal tubular epithelium requires induction by the ureteric bud in vivo or any of several embryonic tissues in vitro. In an effort to eliminate the tissue requirement in embryonic induction, extracellular matrices and soluble factors were analyzed individually or in combination for their ability to stimulate tubulogenesis in uninduced metanephrogenic mesenchyme from 13-gestation-day rat embryos. These evaluations have established that pituitary extract and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in concert with a matrix can promote morphogenesis of mesenchymal rudiments in culture. While type I collagen, laminin, or fibronectin matrices all promoted tubulogenesis in the presence of pituitary extract and EGF, type IV collagen proved the most effective. Under these conditions, tubules were induced in 23/24 mesenchymal rudiments by 9 days in culture. Mesenchyme was not induced prior to explanation since it formed no tubules when cultured in a medium that allowed tubulogenesis in intact embryonic kidneys. Preliminary characterization of the undefined factor in pituitary extract was consistent with a protein of molecular weight greater than 100,000 but less than 300,000. When uninduced metanephrogenic mesenchyme from mouse was used instead of rat tissue, a similar pattern of morphogenesis was not observed, suggesting that the described medium is inappropriate for promoting differentiation in mouse or, less likely, that different mechanisms mediate differentiation in rat and mouse. These studies show that embryonic induction can occur in explanted rat renal mesenchyme in an appropriate environment and does not require the presence of an inductive tissue.     

Specific sides to multifaceted glycosaminoglycans are observed in embryonic development

Ubiquitously found in the extracellular matrix and attached to the surface of most cells, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) mediate many intercellular interactions. Originally described in 1889 as the primary carbohydrate in cartilage and then in 1916 as a coagulation inhibitor from liver, various GAGs have since been identified as key regulators of normal physiology. GAGs are critical mediators of differentiation, migration, tissue morphogenesis, and organogenesis during embryonic development. While GAGs are simple polysaccharide chains, many GAGs acquire a considerable degree of complexity by extensive modifications involving sulfation and epimerization. Embryos that lack specific GAG modifying enzymes have distinct developmental defects, illuminating the importance of GAG complexity. Revealing how these complex molecules specifically function in the embryo has often required additional approaches, the results of which suggest that GAG modifications might instructively mediate embryonic development.     

Parallels between development of embryonic and matrix-induced endochondral bone

Endochondral bone formation can take place in the embryo, during fracture healing, or in postnatal animals after induction by implanted demineralized bone matrix. This matrix-induced bone formation recapitulates the embryonic sequence of bone formation morphologically and biochemically. The steps in bone formation in both systems include differentiation of cartilage from mesenchyme, cartilage maturation, invasion of the cartilage by blood vessels and marrow precursors, and formation of bone and bone marrow. Recently, bone inductive molecules from demineralized bone matrix have been purified, sequenced and produced as recombinant proteins. While there are similarities between bone development in the embryo and that after induction by these purified molecules, the molecules responsible for bone induction in the embryo have not yet been defined. Because of similarities between the two methods of bone formation, studies of bone induction by demineralized bone matrix may help to elucidate mechanisms of embryonic bone induction.     

Shaping sound in space: the regulation of inner ear patterning

The inner ear is one of the most morphologically elaborate tissues in vertebrates, containing a group of mechanosensitive sensory organs that mediate hearing and balance. These organs are arranged precisely in space and contain intricately patterned sensory epithelia. Here, we review recent studies of inner ear development and patterning which reveal that multiple stages of ear development - ranging from its early induction from the embryonic ectoderm to the establishment of the three cardinal axes and the fine-grained arrangement of sensory cells - are orchestrated by gradients of signaling molecules.     

Features of embryonic induction

The patterned distribution of different organs in the amphibian embryo begins with the establishment of two domains, the animal and vegetal regions, that differ in developmental potency. Differences amplify as inductive interactions occur across boundaries between areas of different potency. Embryonic induction establishes a temporally and spatially dynamic area of developmental potency - a morphogenetic field. The final arrangement and differentiation of cell types within the field emerge from subsequent interactions occurring primarily within the field. These principles are illustrated in a review of the induction of the lens and the heart. Recent studies show that the induction of the lens of the eye and the induction of the heart begin early in development. Most of lens inductions occurs before the formation of the optic vesicle, and the heart appears to be part of a complex of dorsal structures whose formation is dependent upon the establishment of the dorsoventral axis. Suppressive as well as inductive tissue interactions occur during the determination of both of these organs, affecting their position and time of appearance. The complex processes of induction defined by the past nine decades of experimental work present many challenging questions that can now be addressed, especially in terms of the molecular events, cellular behaviour and regulatory physiology of the responding tissue.     

Cell lineages in the embryonic kidney: their inductive interactions and signalling molecules.

The first signalling genes acting in the inductive interactions in the kidney have now been identified. Differentiation of the permanent kidney or the metanephros is critically dependent on inductive signalling between the nephrogenic mesenchyme and ureteric bud epithelium. Further inductive interactions occur between developing nephrons, interstitial stroma, endothelial cells and neurones. Glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor is a signal for the ureteric bud initiation and branching, and Wnt4 is an autocrine epithelializing signal at the pretubular stage of nephron formation. The signals for renal angiogenesis and innervation are less well defined, but seem to include vascular endothelial growth factor and neurotrophins, at least. The ureteric-bud-derived signal for induction of the nephrogenic mesenchyme (to bring the cells to the condensate stage) is not yet known, but fibroblast growth factor 2 is a good candidate. None of the signalling genes identified from the embryonic kidney is specific to the organ, which raises some general questions. How do the organs develop from similar rudiments to various patterns with different cell types and functions? Does the information for organ-specific differentiation pathways retain in the epithelial or mesenchymal compartment? The present, rather fragmentary molecular data would favour the view that similar molecules acting in different combinations and developmental sequences, rather than few organ-specific master genes, could be responsible for the divergence of patterning.     

Early tissue interactions leading to embryonic lens formation in Xenopus laevis

Our previous research has demonstrated that lens induction in Xenopus laevis requires inductive interactions prior to contact with the optic vesicle, which classically had been thought to be the major lens inductor. The importance of these early interactions has been verified by demonstrating that lens ectoderm is specified by the time it comes into contact with the optic vesicle. It has been argued that the tissues which underlie the presumptive lens ectoderm during gastrulation and neurulation, dorsolateral endoderm and mesoderm, are the primary early inductors. We show here, however, that these tissues alone cannot elicit lens formation in Xenopus ectoderm. Evidence is presented that presumptive anterior neural plate tissue (which includes the early eye rudiment) is an essential early lens inductor in Xenopus. The presence of dorsolateral mesoderm appears to enhance this response. These findings support a model in which an essential inductive signal passes through the plane of ectoderm during gastrula and early neurula stages from presumptive anterior neural tissue to the presumptive lens ectoderm. Since there is evidence for such interactions within a tissue layer in mesodermal and neural induction as well, this may be a general feature of the initial stages of determination of many tissues.