A repeated coiled-coil interruption in the Escherichia coli condensin MukB

MukB, a divergent structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein, is important for chromosome segregation and condensation in Escherichia coli and other γ-proteobacteria. MukB and canonical SMC proteins share a common five-domain structure in which globular N- and C-terminal regions combine to form an ATP-binding-cassette-like ATPase domain. This ATPase domain is connected to a central, globular dimerization domain by a long antiparallel coiled coil. The structures of both globular domains have been solved recently. In contrast, little is known about the coiled coil, in spite of its clear importance for SMC function.Recently, we identified interacting regions on the N- and C-terminal halves of the MukB coiled coil through photoaffinity cross-linking experiments. On the basis of these low-resolution experimental constraints, phylogenetic data, and coiled-coil prediction analysis, we proposed a preliminary model in which the MukB coiled coil is divided into multiple segments. Here, we use a disulfide cross-linking assay to detect paired residues on opposite strands of MukB's coiled coil. This method provides accurate register data and demonstrates the presence of at least five coiled-coil segments in this domain. Moreover, these studies show that the segments are interrupted by a repeated, unprecedented deviation from canonical coiled-coil structure. These experiments provide a sufficiently detailed view of the MukB coiled coil to allow rational manipulation of this region for the first time, opening the door for structure-function studies of this domain.     

The Crystal Structure of the Hinge Domain of the Escherichia coli Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes Protein MukB

MukB, a divergent structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein, is important for chromosomal segregation and condensation in γ-proteobacteria. MukB and canonical SMC proteins share a characteristic five-domain structure. Globular N- and C-terminal domains interact to form an ATP-binding cassette-like ATPase or “head” domain, which is connected to a smaller dimerization or “hinge” domain by a long, antiparallel coiled coil. In addition to mediating dimerization, this hinge region has been implicated in both conformational flexibility and dynamic protein-DNA interactions. We report here the first crystallographic model of the MukB hinge domain. This model also contains approximately 20% of the coiled-coil domain, including an unusual coiled-coil deviation. These results will facilitate studies to clarify the roles of both the hinge and the coiled-coil domains in MukB function.     

Structural mapping of the coiled‐coil domain of a bacterial condensin and comparative analyses across all domains of life suggest conserved features of SMC proteins

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins form the cores of multisubunit complexes that are required for the segregation and global organization of chromosomes in all domains of life. These proteins share a common domain structure in which N‐ and C‐ terminal regions pack against one another to form a globular ATPase domain. This “head” domain is connected to a central, globular, “hinge” or dimerization domain by a long, antiparallel coiled coil. To date, most efforts for structural characterization of SMC proteins have focused on the globular domains. Recently, however, we developed a method to map interstrand interactions in the 50‐nm coiled‐coil domain of MukB, the divergent SMC protein found in γ‐proteobacteria. Here, we apply that technique to map the structure of the Bacillus subtilis SMC (BsSMC) coiled‐coil domain. We find that, in contrast to the relatively complicated coiled‐coil domain of MukB, the BsSMC domain is nearly continuous, with only two detectable coiled‐coil interruptions. Near the middle of the domain is a break in coiled‐coil structure in which there are three more residues on the C‐terminal strand than on the N‐terminal strand. Close to the head domain, there is a second break with a significantly longer insertion on the same strand. These results provide an experience base that allows an informed interpretation of the output of coiled‐coil prediction algorithms for this family of proteins. A comparison of such predictions suggests that these coiled‐coil deviations are highly conserved across SMC types in a wide variety of organisms, including humans. Proteins 2015; 83:1027–1045. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The Symmetrical Structure of Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) and MukB Proteins: Long,Antiparallel Coiled Coils,Folded at a Flexible Hinge

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins function in chromosome condensation and several other aspects of DNA processing. They are large proteins characterized by an NH₂-terminal nucleotide triphosphate (NTP)-binding domain, two long segments of coiled coil separated by a hinge, and a COOH-terminal domain. Here, we have visualized by EM the SMC protein from Bacillus subtilis (BsSMC) and MukB from Escherichia coli, which we argue is a divergent SMC protein. Both BsSMC and MukB show two thin rods with globular domains at the ends emerging from the hinge. The hinge appears to be quite flexible: the arms can open up to 180°, separating the terminal domains by 100 nm, or close to near 0°, bringing the terminal globular domains together.A surprising observation is that the ∼300–amino acid–long coiled coils are in an antiparallel arrangement. Known coiled coils are almost all parallel, and the longest antiparallel coiled coils known previously are 35–45 amino acids long. This antiparallel arrangement produces a symmetrical molecule with both an NH₂- and a COOH-terminal domain at each end. The SMC molecule therefore has two complete and identical functional domains at the ends of the long arms. The bifunctional symmetry and a possible scissoring action at the hinge should provide unique biomechanical properties to the SMC proteins.     

Crystal structure of the SMC head domain: an ABC ATPase with 900 residues antiparallel coiled-coil inserted

SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) proteins are large coiled-coil proteins involved in chromosome condensation, sister chromatid cohesion, and DNA double-strand break processing. They share a conserved five-domain architecture with three globular domains separated by two long coiled-coil segments. The coiled-coil segments are antiparallel, bringing the N and C-terminal globular domains together. We have expressed a fusion protein of the N and C-terminal globular domains of Thermotoga maritima SMC in Escherichia coli by replacing the approximately 900 residue coiled-coil and hinge segment with a short peptide linker. The SMC head domain (SMChd) binds and condenses DNA in an ATP-dependent manner. Using selenomethionine-substituted protein and multiple anomalous dispersion phasing, we have solved the crystal structure of the SMChd to 3.1 A resolution. In the monoclinic crystal form, six SMChd molecules form two turns of a helix. The fold of SMChd is closely related to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) ATPase family of proteins and Rad50, a member of the SMC family involved in DNA double-strand break repair. In SMChd, the ABC ATPase fold is formed by the N and C-terminal domains with the 900 residue coiled-coil and hinge segment inserted in the middle of the fold. The crystal structure of an SMChd confirms that the coiled-coil segments in SMC proteins are anti-parallel and shows how the N and C-terminal domains come together to form an ABC ATPase. Comparison to the structure of the MukB N-terminal domain demonstrates the close relationship between MukB and SMC proteins, and indicates a helix to strand conversion when N and C-terminal parts come together.     

Crystal structure of the MukB hinge domain with coiled‐coil stretches and its functional implications

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family proteins are commonly found in the multiprotein complexes involved in chromosome organization, including chromosome condensation and sister chromatid cohesion. These proteins are characterized by forming a V‐shaped homo‐ or heterodimeric structure with two long coiled‐coil arms having two ATPase head domains at the distal ends. The hinge domain, located in the middle of the coiled coil, forms the dimer interface. In addition to being the dimerization module, SMC hinges appear to play other roles, including the gateway function for DNA entry into the cohesin complex. Herein, we report the homodimeric structure of the hinge domain of Escherichia coli MukB, which forms a prokaryotic condensin complex with two non‐SMC subunits, MukE and MukF. In contrast with SMC hinge of Thermotoga maritima which has a sizable central hole at the dimer interface, MukB hinge forms a constricted dimer interface lacking a hole. Under our assay conditions, MukB hinge does not interact with DNA in accordance with the absence of a notable positively charged surface patch. The function of MukB hinge appears to be limited to dimerization of two copies of MukB molecules. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Differential arrangements of conserved building blocks among homologs of the Rad50/Mre11 DNA repair protein complex

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins have diverse cellular functions including chromosome segregation, condensation and DNA repair. They are grouped based on a conserved set of distinct structural motifs. All SMC proteins are predicted to have a bipartite ATPase domain that is separated by a long region predicted to form a coiled coil. Recent structural data on a variety of SMC proteins shows them to be arranged as long intramolecular coiled coils with a globular ATPase at one end. SMC proteins function in pairs as heterodimers or as homodimers often in complexes with other proteins. We expect the arrangement of the SMC protein domains in complex assemblies to have important implications for their diverse functions. We used scanning force microscopy imaging to determine the architecture of human, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Pyrococcus furiosus Rad50/Mre11, Escherichia coli SbcCD, and S.cerevisiae SMC1/SMC3 cohesin SMC complexes. Two distinct architectural arrangements are described, based on the way their components were connected. The eukaryotic complexes were similar to each other and differed from their prokaryotic and archaeal homologs. These similarities and differences are discussed with respect to their diverse mechanistic roles in chromosome metabolism.     

Structure of the Rad50 x Mre11 DNA repair complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron microscopy

The RAD50 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of several genes required for recombinational repair of double-strand DNA breaks during vegetative growth and for initiation of meiotic recombination. Rad50 forms a complex with two other proteins, Mre11 and Xrs2, and this complex is involved in double-strand break formation and processing. Rad50 has limited sequence homology to the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family of proteins and shares the same domain structure as SMCs: N- and C-terminal globular domains separated by two long coiled-coils. However, a notable difference is the much smaller non-coil hinge region between the two coiled-coils. We report here a structural analysis of full-length S. cerevisiae Rad50, alone and in a complex with yeast Mre11 by electron microscopy. Our results confirm that yeast Rad50 does have the same antiparallel coiled-coil structure as SMC proteins, but with no detectable globular hinge domain. However, the molecule is still able to bend sharply in the middle to bring the two catalytic domains together, indicating that the small hinge domain is flexible. We also demonstrate that Mre11 binds as a dimer between the catalytic domains of Rad50, bringing the nuclease activities of Mre11 in close proximity to the ATPase and DNA binding activities of Rad50.     

Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of MukB: a protein involved in chromosome partitioning.

BACKGROUND: The 170 kDa protein MukB has been implicated in ATP-dependent chromosome partitioning during cell division in Escherichia coli. MukB shares its dimeric structure and domain architecture with the ubiquitous family of SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) proteins that facilitate similar functions. The N-terminal domain of MukB carries a putative Walker A nucleotide-binding region and the C-terminal domain has been shown to bind to DNA. Mutant phenotypes and a domain arrangement similar to motor proteins that move on microtubules led to the suggestion that MukB might be a motor protein acting on DNA. RESULTS: We have cloned, overexpressed and crystallized a 26 kDa protein consisting of 227 N-terminal residues of MukB from E. coli. The structure has been solved using multiple anomalous dispersion and has been refined to 2.2 A resolution. The N-terminal domain of MukB has a mixed alpha/beta fold with a central six-stranded antiparallel beta sheet. The putative nucleotide-binding loop, which is part of an unexpected helix-loop-helix motif, is exposed on the surface and no nucleotide-binding pocket could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: The N-terminal domain of MukB has no similarity to the kinesin family of motor proteins or to any other nucleotide-binding protein. Together with the finding of the exposed Walker A motif this observation supports a model in which the N- and C-terminal domains come together in the dimer of MukB to form the active site. Conserved residues on one side of the molecule delineate a region of the N-terminal domain that is likely to interact with the C-terminal domain.     

SMC proteins in bacteria: condensation motors for chromosome segregation?

SMC proteins are a ubiquitous protein family, present in almost all organisms so far analysed except for a few bacteria. They function in chromosome condensation, segregation, cohesion, and DNA recombination repair in eukaryotes, and can introduce positive writhe into DNA in vitro. SMC proteins and the structurally homologous MukB protein are unusual ATPases that form antiparallel dimers, with long coiled coil segments separating globular ends capable of binding DNA. Recently, SMC proteins have been shown to be essential for chromosome condensation, segregation and cell cycle progression in bacteria. Identification of a suppressor mutation for MukB in topoisomerase I in Escherichia coli suggests that SMC proteins are involved in negative DNA supercoiling in vivo, and by this means organize and compact chromosomes. A model is discussed in which bacterial SMC proteins act after an initial separation of replicated chromosome origins into the future daughter cell, separating sister chromatids by condensing replicated DNA strands within both cell halves. This would be analogous to a pulling of DNA strands into opposite cell halves by a condensation mechanism exerted at two specialised subregions in the cell.     

Assembly Mechanism of Trypanosoma brucei BILBO1, a Multidomain Cytoskeletal Protein

Trypanosoma brucei BILBO1 (TbBILBO1) is an essential component of the flagellar pocket collar of trypanosomes. We recently reported the high resolution structure of the N-terminal domain of TbBILBO1. Here, we provide further structural dissections of its other three constituent domains: EF-hand, coiled coil, and leucine zipper. We found that the EF-hand changes its conformation upon calcium binding, the central coiled coil forms an antiparallel dimer, and the C-terminal leucine zipper appears to contain targeting information. Furthermore, interdimer interactions between adjacent leucine zippers allow TbBILBO1 to form extended filaments in vitro. These filaments were additionally found to condense into fibers through lateral interactions. Based on these experimental data, we propose a mechanism for TbBILBO1 assembly at the flagellar pocket collar.     

The RET finger protein interacts with the hinge region of SMC3

The structural maintenance of chromosome 3 protein (SMC3) is a component of the multimeric cohesin complex that holds sister chromatids together and prevents their premature separation during mitosis. By screening a human cDNA library for interacting proteins we have established that the proto-oncogene RET finger protein (RFP) interacts with SMC3. The sites of interaction map to part of the central coiled coil region of RFP and to the C-terminal region of the SMC3 globular hinge domain. SMC3/RFP interaction was confirmed in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation studies and by performing mammalian two-hybrid interaction assays. Cytoimmunolocalization experiments showed that SMC3 and RFP co-localize in the same cell substructures. Overexpression of RFP in NIH3T3 cells significantly increased the fraction of SMC3 recovered in the nucleus supporting the idea that RFP regulates the intracellular distribution of SMC3. These studies identify a novel SMC3-interacting protein that may affect SMC3 availability to complex with its cohesin partners.     

Structure of the Entire Stalk Region of the Dynein Motor Domain

Dyneins are large microtubule-based motor complexes that power a range of cellular processes including the transport of organelles, as well as the beating of cilia and flagella. The motor domain is located within the dynein heavy chain and comprises an N-terminal mechanical linker element, a central ring of six AAA + modules of which four bind or hydrolyze ATP, and a long stalk extending from the AAA + ring with a microtubule-binding domain (MTBD) at its tip. A crucial mechanism underlying the motile activity of cytoskeletal motor proteins is precise coupling between the ATPase and track-binding activities. In dynein, a stalk region consisting of a long (~ 15 nm) antiparallel coiled coil separates these two activities, which must facilitate communication between them. This communication is mediated by a small degree of helix sliding in the coiled coil. However, no high-resolution structure is available of the entire stalk region including the MTBD. Here, we have reported the structure of the entire stalk region of mouse cytoplasmic dynein in a weak microtubule-binding state, which was determined using X-ray crystallography, and have compared it with the dynein motor domain from Dictyostelium discoideum in a strong microtubule-binding state and with a mouse MTBD with its distal portion of the coiled coil fused to seryl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus. Our results strongly support the helix-sliding model based on the complete structure of the dynein stalk with a different form of coiled-coil packing. We also propose a plausible mechanism of helix sliding together with further analysis using molecular dynamics simulations. Our results present the importance of conserved proline residues for an elastic motion of stalk coiled coil and imply the manner of change between high-affinity state and low-affinity state of MTBD.     

The tetramerization domain of the Mnt repressor consists of two right-handed coiled coils.

The tetrameric Mnt repressor is involved in the genetic switch between the lysogenic and lytic growth of Salmonella bacteriophage P22. The solution structure of its C-terminal tetramerization domain, which holds together the two dimeric DNA-binding domains, has been determined by NMR spectroscopy. This structure reveals an assembly of four alpha-helical subunits, consisting of a dimer of two antiparallel coiled coils with a unique right-handed twist. The superhelical winding is considerably stronger and the interhelical separation closer than those found in the well-known left-handed coiled coils in fibrous proteins and leucine zippers. An unusual asymmetry arises between the two monomers that comprise one right-handed coiled coil. A difference in the packing to the adjacent monomer of the other coiled coil occurs with an offset of two helical turns. The two asymmetric monomers within each coiled coil interconvert on a time scale of seconds. Both with respect to symmetry and handedness of helical packing, the C2 symmetric four-helix bundle of Mnt differs from other oligomerization domains that assemble DNA-binding modules, such as that in the tumor suppressor p53 and the E. coli lac repressor.     

Fine-tuning of protein domain boundary by minimizing potential coiled coil regions

Structural determination of individual protein domains isolated from multidomain proteins is a common approach in the post-genomic era. Novel and thus uncharacterized domains liberated from intact proteins often self-associate due to incorrectly defined domain boundaries. Self-association results in missing signals, poor signal dispersion and a low signal-to-noise ratio in ¹H–¹⁵N HSQC spectra. We have found that a putative, non-canonical coiled coil region close to a domain boundary can cause transient hydrophobic self-association and monomer–dimer equilibrium in solution. Here we propose a rational method to predict putative coiled coil regions adjacent to the globular core domain using the program COILS. Except for the amino acid sequence, no preexisting knowledge concerning the domain is required. A small number of mutant proteins with a minimized coiled coil region have been rationally designed and tested. The engineered domains exhibit decreased self-association as assessed by ¹H–¹⁵N HSQC spectra with improved peak dispersion and sharper cross peaks. Two successful examples of isolating novel N-terminal domains from AAA-ATPases are demonstrated. Our method is useful for the experimental determination of domain boundaries suited for structural genomics studies. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available to authorised users in the online version of this article at .     

Simultaneous formation of right- and left-handed anti-parallel coiled-coil interfaces by a coil2 fragment of human lamin A

The elementary building block of all intermediate filaments (IFs) is a dimer featuring a central α-helical rod domain flanked by the N- and C-terminal end domains. In nuclear IF proteins (lamins), the rod domain consists of two coiled-coil segments, coil1 and coil2, that are connected by a short non-helical linker. Coil1 and the C-terminal part of coil2 contain the two highly conserved IF consensus motifs involved in the longitudinal assembly of dimers. The previously solved crystal structure of a lamin A fragment (residues 305-387) corresponding to the second half of coil2 has yielded a parallel left-handed coiled coil. Here, we present the crystal structure and solution properties of another human lamin A fragment (residues 328-398), which is largely overlapping with fragment 305-387 but harbors a short segment of the tail domain. Unexpectedly, no parallel coiled coil forms within the crystal. Instead, the α-helices are arranged such that two anti-parallel coiled-coil interfaces are formed. The most significant interface has a right-handed geometry, which is accounted for by a characteristic 15-residue repeat pattern that overlays with the canonical heptad repeat pattern. The second interface is a left-handed anti-parallel coiled coil based on the predicted heptad repeat pattern. In solution, the fragment reveals only a weak dimerization propensity. We speculate that the C-terminus of coil2 might unzip, thereby allowing for a right-handed coiled-coil interface to form between two laterally aligned dimers. Such an interface might co-exist with a heterotetrameric left-handed coiled-coil assembly, which is expected to be responsible for the longitudinal A_CN contact.     

Orientation and oligomerization specificity of the Bcr coiled-coil oligomerization domain

The Bcr oligomerization domain, from the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein, is an attractive therapeutic target for treating leukemias because it is required for cellular transformation. The domain homodimerizes via an antiparallel coiled coil with an adjacent short, helical swap domain. Inspection of the coiled-coil sequence does not reveal obvious determinants of helix-orientation specificity, raising the possibility that the antiparallel orientation preference and/or the dimeric oligomerization state are due to interactions of the swap domains. To better understand how structural specificity is encoded in Bcr, coiled-coil constructs containing either an N- or C-terminal cysteine were synthesized without the swap domain. When cross-linked to adopt exclusively parallel or antiparallel orientations, these showed similar circular dichroism spectra. Both constructs formed coiled-coil dimers, but the antiparallel construct was approximately 16 degrees C more stable than the parallel to thermal denaturation. Equilibrium disulfide-exchange studies confirmed that the isolated coiled-coil homodimer shows a very strong preference for the antiparallel orientation. We conclude that the orientation and oligomerization preferences of Bcr are not caused by the presence of the swap domains, but rather are directly encoded in the coiled-coil sequence. We further explored possible determinants of structural specificity by mutating residues in the d position of the coiled-coil core. Some of the mutations caused a change in orientation specificity, and all of the mutations led to the formation of higher-order oligomers. In the absence of the swap domain, these residues play an important role in disfavoring alternate states and are especially important for encoding dimeric oligomerization specificity.     

Mammalian SMC3 C-terminal and coiled-coil protein domains specifically bind palindromic DNA, do not block DNA ends, and prevent DNA bending

The C-terminal domains of yeast structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins were previously shown to bind double-stranded DNA, which generated the idea of the antiparallel SMC heterodimer, such as the SMC1/3 dimer, bridging two DNA molecules. Analysis of bovine SMC1 and SMC3 protein domains now reveals that not only the C-terminal domains, but also the coiled-coil region, binds DNA, while the N terminus is inactive. Duplex DNA and DNA molecules with secondary structures are highly preferred substrates for both the C-terminal and coiled-coil domains. Contrasting other cruciform DNA-binding proteins like HMG1, the SMC3 C-terminal and coiled-coil domains do not bend DNA, but rather prevent bending in ring closure assays. Phosphatase, exonuclease, and ligase assays showed that neither domain renders DNA ends inaccessible for other enzymes. These observations allow modifications of models for SMC-DNA interactions.     

The role of MukE in assembling a functional MukBEF complex

The MukB-MukE-MukF protein complex is essential for chromosome condensation and segregation in Escherichia coli. The central component of this complex, the MukB protein, is related functionally and structurally to the ubiquitous SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) proteins. In a manner similar to SMC, MukB requires the association of two accessory proteins (MukE and MukF) for its function. MukF is a constitutive dimer that bridges the interaction between MukB and MukE. While MukB can condense DNA on its own, it requires MukF and MukE to ensure proper chromosome segregation. Here, we present a novel structure of the E. coli MukE-MukF complex, in which the intricate crystal packing interactions reveal an alternative MukE dimerization interface spanning both N- and C-terminal winged-helix domains of the protein. The structure also unveils additional cross-linking interactions between adjacent MukE-MukF complexes mediated by MukE. A variant of MukE encompassing point mutations on one of these surfaces does not affect assembly of the MukB-MukE-MukF complex and yet cannot restore the temperature sensitivity of the mukE∷kan strain, suggesting that this surface may mediate critical protein-protein interactions between MukB-MukE-MukF complexes. Since the dimerization interface of MukE overlaps with the region of the protein that interacts with MukB in the MukB-MukE-MukF complex, we suggest that competing MukB-MukE and MukE-MukE interactions may regulate the formation of higher-order structures of bacterial condensin.