α-SNAP prevents docking of the acrosome during sperm exocytosis because it sequesters monomeric syntaxin

α-SNAP has an essential role in membrane fusion that consists of bridging cis SNARE complexes to NSF. α-SNAP stimulates NSF, which releases itself, α-SNAP, and individual SNAREs that subsequently re-engage in the trans arrays indispensable for fusion. α-SNAP also binds monomeric syntaxin and NSF disengages the α-SNAP/syntaxin dimer. Here, we examine why recombinant α-SNAP blocks secretion in permeabilized human sperm despite the fact that the endogenous protein is essential for membrane fusion. The only mammalian organism with a genetically modified α-SNAP is the hyh mouse strain, which bears a M105I point mutation; males are subfertile due to defective sperm exocytosis. We report here that recombinant α-SNAP-M105I has greater affinity for the cytosolic portion of immunoprecipitated syntaxin than the wild type protein and in consequence NSF is less efficient in releasing the mutant. α-SNAP-M105I is a more potent sperm exocytosis blocker than the wild type and requires higher concentrations of NSF to rescue its effect. Unlike other fusion scenarios where SNAREs are subjected to an assembly/disassembly cycle, the fusion machinery in sperm is tuned so that SNAREs progress uni-directionally from a cis configuration in resting cells to monomeric and subsequently trans arrays in cells challenged with exocytosis inducers. By means of functional and indirect immunofluorescense assays, we show that recombinant α-SNAPs--wild type and M105I--inhibit exocytosis because they bind monomeric syntaxin and prevent this SNARE from assembling with its cognates in trans. Sequestration of free syntaxin impedes docking of the acrosome to the plasma membrane assessed by transmission electron microscopy. The N-terminal deletion mutant α-SNAP-(160-295), unable to bind syntaxin, affects neither docking nor secretion. The implications of this study are twofold: our findings explain the fertility defect of hyh mice and indicate that assembly of SNAREs in trans complexes is essential for docking.     

Fibrillar Oligomers Nucleate the Oligomerization of Monomeric Amyloid �� but Do Not Seed Fibril Formation

Soluble amyloid oligomers are potent neurotoxins that are involved in a wide range of human degenerative diseases, including Alzheimer disease. In Alzheimer disease, amyloid β (Aβ) oligomers bind to neuronal synapses, inhibit long term potentiation, and induce cell death. Recent evidence indicates that several immunologically distinct structural variants exist as follows: prefibrillar oligomers (PFOs), fibrillar oligomers (FOs), and annular protofibrils. Despite widespread interest, amyloid oligomers are poorly characterized in terms of structural differences and pathological significance. FOs are immunologically related to fibrils because they react with OC, a conformation-dependent, fibril-specific antibody and do not react with antibodies specific for other types of oligomers. However, fibrillar oligomers are much smaller than fibrils. FOs are soluble at 100,000 × g, rich in β-sheet structures, but yet bind weakly to thioflavin T. EPR spectroscopy indicates that FOs display significantly more spin-spin interaction at multiple labeled sites than PFOs and are more structurally similar to fibrils. Atomic force microscopy indicates that FOs are approximately one-half to one-third the height of mature fibrils. We found that Aβ FOs do not seed the formation of thioflavin T-positive fibrils from Aβ monomers but instead seed the formation of FOs from Aβ monomers that are positive for the OC anti-fibril antibody. These results indicate that the lattice of FOs is distinct from the fibril lattice even though the polypeptide chains are organized in an immunologically identical conformation. The FOs resulting from seeded reactions have the same dimensions and morphology as the initial seeds, suggesting that the seeds replicate by growing to a limiting size and then splitting, indicating that their lattice is less stable than fibrils. We suggest that FOs may represent small pieces of single fibril protofilament and that the addition of monomers to the ends of FOs is kinetically more favorable than the assembly of the oligomers into fibrils via sheet stacking interaction. These studies provide novel structural insight into the relationship between fibrils and FOs and suggest that the increased toxicity of FOs may be due to their ability to replicate and the exposure of hydrophobic sheet surfaces that are otherwise obscured by sheet-sheet interactions between protofilaments in a fibril.     

Contrast Enhancement of the Right Ventricle during Coronary CT Angiography – Is It Necessary?

Purpose

It is unclear if prolonged contrast media injection, to improve right ventricular visualization during coronary CT angiography, leads to increased detection of right ventricle pathology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate right ventricle enhancement and subsequent detection of right ventricle disease during coronary CT angiography.

Materials and Methods

472 consecutive patients referred for screening coronary CT angiography were retrospectively evaluated. Every patient underwent multidetector-row CT of the coronary arteries: 128x 0.6mm coll., 100-120kV, rot. time 0.28s, ref. mAs 350 and received an individualized (P3T) contrast bolus injection of iodinated contrast medium (300 mgI/ml). Patient data were analyzed to assess right ventricle enhancement (HU) and right ventricle pathology. Image quality was defined good when right ventricle enhancement >200HU, moderate when 140-200HU and poor when <140HU.

Results

Good image quality was found in 372 patients, moderate in 80 patients and poor in 20 patients. Mean enhancement of the right ventricle cavity was 268HU±102. Patients received an average bolus of 108±24 ml at an average peak flow rate of 6.1±2.2 ml/s. In only three out of 472 patients (0.63%) pathology of the right ventricle was found (dilatation) No other right ventricle pathology was detected.

Conclusion

Right ventricle pathology was detected in three out of 472 patients; the dilatation observed in these three cases may have been picked up even without dedicated enhancement of the right ventricle. Based on our findings, right ventricle enhancement can be omitted during screening coronary CT angiography.     

Activation of NF-��B Protein Prevents the Transition from Juvenile Ovary to Testis and Promotes Ovarian Development in Zebrafish

Testis differentiation in zebrafish involves juvenile ovary to testis transformation initiated by an apoptotic wave. The molecular regulation of this transformation process is not fully understood. NF-κB is activated at an early stage of development and has been shown to interact with steroidogenic factor-1 in mammals, leading to the suppression of anti-Müllerian hormone (Amh) gene expression. Because steroidogenic factor-1 and Amh are important for proper testis development, NF-κB-mediated induction of anti-apoptotic genes could, therefore, also play a role in zebrafish gonad differentiation. The aim of this study was to examine the potential role of NF-κB in zebrafish gonad differentiation. Exposure of juvenile zebrafish to heat-killed Escherichia coli activated the NF-κB pathways and resulted in an increased ratio of females from 30 to 85%. Microarray and quantitative real-time-PCR analysis of gonads showed elevated expression of NF-κB-regulated genes. To confirm the involvement of NF-κB-induced anti-apoptotic effects, zebrafish were treated with sodium deoxycholate, a known inducer of NF-κB or NF-κB activation inhibitor (NAI). Sodium deoxycholate treatment mimicked the effect of heat-killed bacteria and resulted in an increased proportion of females from 25 to 45%, whereas the inhibition of NF-κB using NAI resulted in a decrease in females from 45 to 20%. This study provides proof for an essential role of NF-κB in gonadal differentiation of zebrafish and represents an important step toward the complete understanding of the complicated process of sex differentiation in this species and possibly other cyprinid teleosts as well.     

When do the Costs of Spermatogenesis Constrain Sperm Expenditure? Remarks on the Pattern of the Spermatogenic Cycle

The costs of spermatogenesis constrain sperm expenditure when sperm production per day is limited. Thus, males are challenged to allocate available resources to sperm production and other life history functions. However, this prevailing assumption is not applicable to species in which spermatogenesis becomes quiescent during the breeding season. Males of these species prepare large quantities of sperm before the breeding season. Among these species, constraints on ejaculates have been intensively investigated in salamanders that deposit spermatophores. Although it is predicted that sperm expenditure should not be limited because of abundantly prepared sperm, spermatophore deposition is often limited during the breeding season when vas deferens are full of sperm. We tested a hypothesis regarding limited spermatophore deposition by measuring sperm quantity and volume of spermatophores sequentially deposited by male eastern newts Notophthalmus viridescens. A male newt rarely deposits more than three spermatophores per mating. If depletion of non‐sperm components of spermatophores limits spermatophore deposition, we predicted that spermatophore volume decreases while sperm quantity remains constant as a male deposits more spermatophores. Alternatively, some regulative mechanisms allow a limited portion of available sperm to be expended per mating, in which sperm quantity is predicted to decrease while the spermatophore volume remains constant. Finally, depletion of non‐sperm components may regulate sperm expenditure, which predicted that both spermatophore volume and sperm quantity decrease. We found that both sperm quantity and the spermatophore volume decreased as a male deposited more spermatophores during a single mating. Sperm expenditure was constrained without the costs involved in active spermatogenesis, and depletion of non‐sperm components likely regulate sperm quantity loaded in spermatophores. In dissociated spermatogenesis, constrained sperm expenditure do not mean that costly spermatogenesis is directly limiting male mating capacity but rather suggest that the evolution of physiological mechanisms regulating sperm expenditure per mating maximizes male reproductive success.     

Expression of ��1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases during differentiation of human acute myeloid leukemia cells

The expressions of β1,3-N-acetylglucosamonyltransferase-2 and -8 (β3GnT-2, β3GnT-8),-the two main glycosyltransferases responsible for the synthesis of poly-N-acetyllactosamine (polyLacNAc) in glycans, and β3GnT-5 participating in the syntheses of sphingoglycolipids were studied in leukemia cell lines during differentiation using RT-PCR method. β3GnT-2 and β3GnT-8 distribute widely in six myeloid and monocytoid leukemia cell lines with different abundances, while β3GnT-4 was only present in NB4 cells. ATRA (all-trans retinoic acid) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), which induce the differentiation of HL-60 and NB4 (two human acute myeloid leukemia cell lines) to myelocytic lineage, up-regulated these two enzymes with various degrees at 2 and 72 h of treatment. In HL-60 cells treated with ATRA, the increase of β3GnT-8 was more than β3GnT-2, while in NB4 cells treated with DMSO, the increase of β3GnT-2 was more than β3GnT-8. However, when HL-60 and NB4 were differentiated to monocytic lineage induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate the expressions of β3GnT-2 and β3GnT-8 showed no alterations or the increase of expressions was far less than those in myelocytic differentiation. By means of FITC-labeled tomato lectin affinity staining and flow-cytometry, it was found that the product of β3GnT-2 and -8, polyLacNAc was also increased on the cell surface of HL-60 and NB4 treated with ATRA or DMSO, but unchanged when treated with PMA. These results were in accordance with the up-regulation of the mRNAs of β3GnT-2 and -8. The expression of β3GnT-5, however, was not changed both in myelocytic and monocytic differentiations. The difference in the up-regulation of β3GnT-2 and -8, especially their products may become a useful index to discriminate the myelocytic and monocytic differentiation of leukemia cells.     

��Shotgun DNA synthesis�� for the high-throughput construction of large DNA molecules

We developed a highly scalable ‘shotgun’ DNA synthesis technology by utilizing microchip oligonucleotides, shotgun assembly and next-generation sequencing technology. A pool of microchip oligonucleotides targeting a penicillin biosynthetic gene cluster were assembled into numerous random fragments, and tagged with 20 bp degenerate barcode primer pairs. An optimal set of error-free fragments were identified by high-throughput DNA sequencing, selectively amplified using the barcode sequences, and successfully assembled into the target gene cluster.     

Purification and Functional Reconstitution of Monomeric ��-Opioid Receptors: ALLOSTERIC MODULATION OF AGONIST BINDING BY Gi2*

Despite extensive characterization of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), the biochemical properties of the isolated receptor remain unclear. In light of recent reports, we proposed that the monomeric form of MOR can activate G proteins and be subject to allosteric regulation. A μ-opioid receptor fused to yellow fluorescent protein (YMOR) was constructed and expressed in insect cells. YMOR binds ligands with high affinity, displays agonist-stimulated [³⁵S]guanosine 5′-(γ-thio)triphosphate binding to Gα_i, and is allosterically regulated by coupled G_i protein heterotrimer both in insect cell membranes and as purified protein reconstituted into a phospholipid bilayer in the form of high density lipoprotein particles. Single-particle imaging of fluorescently labeled receptor indicates that the reconstituted YMOR is monomeric. Moreover, single-molecule imaging of a Cy3-labeled agonist, [Lys⁷, Cys⁸]dermorphin, illustrates a novel method for studying G protein-coupled receptor-ligand binding and suggests that one molecule of agonist binds per monomeric YMOR. Together these data support the notion that oligomerization of the μ-opioid receptor is not required for agonist and antagonist binding and that the monomeric receptor is the minimal functional unit in regard to G protein activation and strong allosteric regulation of agonist binding by G proteins.Opioid receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)² superfamily and are clinical mainstays for inducing analgesia. Three isoforms of opioid receptors, μ, δ, and κ, have been cloned and are known to couple to G_i/o proteins to regulate adenylyl cyclase and K⁺/Ca⁺ ion channels (1–3). An ever growing amount of data suggests that many GPCRs oligomerize (4, 5), and several studies have suggested that μ-opioid receptors (MORs) and δ-opioid receptors heterodimerize to form unique ligand binding and G protein-activating units (6–10). Although intriguing, these studies utilize cellular overexpression systems where it is difficult to know the exact nature of protein complexes formed between the receptors.To study the function of isolated GPCRs, our laboratory and others have utilized a novel phospholipid bilayer reconstitution method (11–16). In this approach purified GPCRs are reconstituted into the phospholipid bilayer of a high density lipoprotein (HDL) particle. The reconstituted HDL (rHDL) particles are monodispersed, uniform in size, and preferentially incorporate a GPCR monomer (14, 15). Previous work in our lab has shown that rhodopsin, a class A GPCR previously proposed to function as a dimer (17–19), is fully capable of activating its G protein when reconstituted as a monomer in the rHDL lipid bilayer (15). Moreover, we have demonstrated that agonist binding to a monomeric β₂-adrenergic receptor, another class A GPCR, can be allosterically regulated by G proteins (14). This led us to determine whether a monomer of MOR, a class A GPCR that endogenously binds peptide ligands, is the minimal functional unit required to activate coupled G proteins. We additionally investigated whether agonist binding to monomeric MOR is allosterically regulated by inhibitory G protein heterotrimer.To study the function of monomeric MOR we have purified a modified version of the receptor to near homogeneity. A yellow fluorescent protein was fused to the N terminus of MOR, and this construct (YMOR) was expressed in insect cells for purification. After reconstitution of purified YMOR into rHDL particles, single-molecule imaging of Cy3-labeled and Cy5-labeled YMOR determined that the rHDL particles contained one receptor. This monomeric YMOR sample binds ligands with affinities nearly equivalent to those observed in plasma membrane preparations. Monomeric YMOR efficiently stimulates GTPγS binding to G_i2 heterotrimeric G protein. G_i2 allosteric regulation of agonist binding to rHDL·YMOR was also observed. Single-particle imaging of binding of [Lys⁷, Cys⁸]dermorphin-Cy3, a fluorophore-labeled agonist, to rHDL·YMOR supports the notion that the rHDL particles contain a single YMOR. Taken together, these results suggest that a monomeric MOR is the minimal functional unit for ligand binding and G protein activation and illustrate a novel method for imaging ligand binding to opioid receptors.     

The Role of the ��DELSEED-loop of ATP Synthase

ATP synthase uses a unique rotational mechanism to convert chemical energy into mechanical energy and back into chemical energy. The helix-turn-helix motif, termed “DELSEED-loop,” in the C-terminal domain of the β subunit was suggested to be involved in coupling between catalysis and rotation. Here, the role of the DELSEED-loop was investigated by functional analysis of mutants of Bacillus PS3 ATP synthase that had 3–7 amino acids within the loop deleted. All mutants were able to catalyze ATP hydrolysis, some at rates several times higher than the wild-type enzyme. In most cases ATP hydrolysis in membrane vesicles generated a transmembrane proton gradient, indicating that hydrolysis occurred via the normal rotational mechanism. Except for two mutants that showed low activity and low abundance in the membrane preparations, the deletion mutants were able to catalyze ATP synthesis. In general, the mutants seemed less well coupled than the wild-type enzyme, to a varying degree. Arrhenius analysis demonstrated that in the mutants fewer bonds had to be rearranged during the rate-limiting catalytic step; the extent of this effect was dependent on the size of the deletion. The results support the idea of a significant involvement of the DELSEED-loop in mechanochemical coupling in ATP synthase. In addition, for two deletion mutants it was possible to prepare an α₃β₃γ subcomplex and measure nucleotide binding to the catalytic sites. Interestingly, both mutants showed a severely reduced affinity for MgATP at the high affinity site.F₁F₀-ATP synthase catalyzes the final step of oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation, the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate. F₁F₀-ATP synthase consists of the membrane-embedded F₀ subcomplex, with, in most bacteria, a subunit composition of ab₂c₁₀, and the peripheral F₁ subcomplex, with a subunit composition of α₃β₃γδε. The energy necessary for ATP synthesis is derived from an electrochemical transmembrane proton (or, in some organisms, a sodium ion) gradient. Proton flow down the gradient through F₀ is coupled to ATP synthesis on F₁ by a unique rotary mechanism. The protons flow through (half) channels at the interface of the a and c subunits, which drives rotation of the ring of c subunits. The c₁₀ ring, together with F₁ subunits γ and ε, forms the rotor. Rotation of γ leads to conformational changes in the catalytic nucleotide binding sites on the β subunits, where ADP and P_i are bound. The conformational changes result in the formation and release of ATP. Thus, ATP synthase converts electrochemical energy, the proton gradient, into mechanical energy in the form of subunit rotation and back into chemical energy as ATP. In bacteria, under certain physiological conditions, the process runs in reverse. ATP is hydrolyzed to generate a transmembrane proton gradient, which the bacterium requires for such functions as nutrient import and locomotion (for reviews, see Refs. 1–6).F₁ (or F₁-ATPase) has three catalytic nucleotide binding sites located on the β subunits at the interface to the adjacent α subunit. The catalytic sites have pronounced differences in their nucleotide binding affinity. During rotational catalysis, the sites switch their affinities in a synchronized manner; the position of γ determines which catalytic site is the high affinity site (K_d1 in the nanomolar range), which site is the medium affinity site (K_d2 ≈ 1 μm), and which site is the low affinity site (K_d3 ≈ 30–100 μm; see Refs. 7 and 8). In the original crystal structure of bovine mitochondrial F₁ (9), one of the three catalytic sites, was filled with the ATP analog AMP-PNP,² a second was filled with ADP (plus azide) (see Ref. 10), and the third site was empty. Hence, the β subunits are referred to as β_TP, β_DP, and β_E. The occupied β subunits, β_TP and β_DP, were in a closed conformation, and the empty β_E subunit was in an open conformation. The main difference between these two conformations is found in the C-terminal domain. Here, the “DELSEED-loop,” a helix-turn-helix structure containing the conserved DELSEED motif, is in an “up” position when the catalytic site on the respective β subunit is filled with nucleotide and in a “down” position when the site is empty (Fig. 1A). When all three catalytic sites are occupied by nucleotide, the previously open β_E subunit assumes an intermediate, half-closed (β_HC) conformation. It cannot close completely because of steric clashes with γ (11).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.The βDELSEED-loop. A, interaction of the β_TP and β_E subunits with theγ subunit.β subunits are shown in yellow andγ in blue. The DELSEED-loop (shown in orange, with the DELSEED motif itself in green)of β_TP interacts with the C-terminal helixγ and the short helix that runs nearly perpendicular to the rotation axis. The DELSEED-loop of β_E makes contact with the convex portion of γ, formed mainly by the N-terminal helix. A nucleotide molecule (shown in stick representation) occupies the catalytic site of β_TP, and the subunit is in the closed conformation. The catalytic site on β_E is empty, and the subunit is in the open conformation. This figure is based on Protein Data Bank file 1e79 (32). B, deletions in the βDELSEED-loop. The loop was “mutated” in silico to represent the PS3 ATP synthase. The 3–4-residue segments that are removed in the deletion mutants are color-coded as follows: ³⁸⁰LQDI³⁸³, pink; ³⁸⁴IAIL³⁸⁷, green; ³⁸⁸GMDE³⁹¹, yellow; ³⁹²LSD³⁹⁴, cyan; ³⁹⁵EDKL³⁹⁸, orange; ³⁹⁹VVHR⁴⁰², blue. Residues that are the most involved in contacts with γ are labeled. All figures were generated using the program PyMOL (DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA).The DELSEED-loop of each of the three β subunits makes contact with the γ subunit. In some cases, these contacts consist of hydrogen bonds or salt bridges between the negatively charged residues of the DELSEED motif and positively charged residues on γ. The interactions of the DELSEED-loop with γ, its movement during catalysis, the conservation of the DELSEED motif (see 12–14). Thus, the finding that an AALSAAA mutant in the α₃β₃γ complex of ATP synthase from the thermophilic Bacillus PS3, where several hydrogen bonds/salt bridges to γ are removed simultaneously, could drive rotation of γ with the same torque as the wild-type enzyme (14) came as a surprise. On the other hand, it seems possible that it is the bulk of the DELSEED-loop, more so than individual interactions, that drives rotation of γ. According to a model favored by several authors (6, 15, 16) (see also Refs. 17–19), binding of ATP (or, more precisely, MgATP) to the low affinity catalytic site on β_E and the subsequent closure of this site, accompanied by its conversion into the high affinity site, are responsible for driving the large (80–90°) rotation substep during ATP hydrolysis, with the DELSEED-loop acting as a “pushrod.” A recent molecular dynamics (20) study supports this model and implicates mainly the region around several hydrophobic residues upstream of the DELSEED motif (specifically βI386 and βL387)³ as being responsible for making contact with γ during the large rotation substep.

TABLE 1

Conservation of residues in the DELSEED-loop Amino acids found in selected species in the turn region of the DELSEED-loop. Listed are all positions subjected to deletions in the present study. Residue numbers refer to the PS3 enzyme. Consensus annotation: p, polar residue; s, small residue; h, hydrophobic residue; –, negatively charged residue; +, positively charged residue.Open in a separate windowIn the present study, we investigated the function of the DELSEED-loop using an approach less focused on individual residues, by deleting stretches of 3–7 amino acids between positions β380 and β402 of ATP synthase from the thermophilic Bacillus PS3. We analyzed the functional properties of the deletion mutants after expression in Escherichia coli. The mutants showed ATPase activities, which were in some cases surprisingly high, severalfold higher than the activity of the wild-type control. On the other hand, in all cases where ATP synthesis could be measured, the rates where below or equal to those of the wild-type enzyme. In Arrhenius plots, the hydrolysis rates of the mutants were less temperature-dependent than those of wild-type ATP synthase. In those cases where nucleotide binding to the catalytic sites could be tested, the deletion mutants had a much reduced affinity for MgATP at high affinity site 1. The functional role of the DELSEED-loop will be discussed in light of the new information.