Methyl group turnover on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins during chemotaxis by Bacillus subtilis

The addition of attractant to Bacillus subtilis briefly exposed to radioactive methionine causes an increase of labeling of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. The addition of attractant to cells radiolabeled for longer times shows no change in the extent of methylation. Therefore, the increase in labeling for the briefly labeled cells is due to an increased turnover of methyl groups caused by attractant. All amino acids gave enhanced turnover. This turnover lasted for a prolonged time, probably spanning the period of smooth swimming caused by the attractant addition. Repellent did not affect the turnover when added alone or simultaneously with attractant. Thus, for amino acid attractants, the turnover is probably the excitatory signal, which is seen to extend long into or throughout the adaptation period, not just at the start of it.     

Rapid attractant-induced changes in methylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, addition of chemotactic attractant causes an immediate change in distribution of methyl groups on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), whereas in Escherichia coli, it causes changes that occur throughout the adaptation period. Thus, methylation changes in B. subtilis are probably related to excitation, not adaptation. If labeled cells are exposed to excess nonradioactive methionine, then attractant causes immediate 50% delabeling of the MCPs, suggesting that a flux of methyl groups through the MCPs occurs. Methanol is given off at a high rate during the adaptation period and probably reflects demethylation of some substance to bring about adaptation. The fact that many radioactive methyl groups are lost immediately from the MCPs but only slowly arise as methanol is consistent with the hypothesis that they are transferred from the MCPs to a carrier from which methanol arises. Demethylation of this carrier may cause adaptation.     

Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex

The chemotactic sensory system of Escherichia coli comprises membrane-embedded chemoreceptors and six soluble chemotaxis (Che) proteins. These components form signaling complexes that mediate sensory excitation and adaptation. Previous determinations of cellular content of individual components provided differing and apparently conflicting values. We used quantitative immunoblotting to perform comprehensive determinations of cellular amounts of all components in two E. coli strains considered wild type for chemotaxis, grown in rich and minimal media. Cellular amounts varied up to 10-fold, but ratios between proteins varied no more than 30%. Thus, cellular stoichiometries were almost constant as amounts varied substantially. Calculations using those cellular stoichiometries and values for in vivo proportions of core components in complexes yielded an in vivo stoichiometry for core complexes of 3.4 receptor dimers and 1.6 CheW monomers for each CheA dimer and 2.4 CheY, 0.5 CheZ dimers, 0.08 CheB, and 0.05 CheR per complex. The values suggest a core unit of a trimer of chemoreceptor dimers, a dimer (or two monomers) of kinase CheA, and two CheW. These components may interact in extended arrays and, thus, stoichiometries could be nonintegral. In any case, cellular stoichiometries indicate that CheY could be bound to all signaling complexes and this binding would recruit essentially the entire cellular complement of unphosphorylated CheY, and also that phosphatase CheZ, methylesterase CheB, and methyltransferase CheR would be present at 1 per 2, per 14, and per 20 core complexes, respectively. These characteristic ratios will be important in quantitative treatments of chemotaxis, both experimental and theoretical.     

In vitro methylation and demethylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis responds to attractants by demethylating a group of integral membrane proteins referred to as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). We have studied the methylation and demethylation of these proteins in an in vitro system, consisting of membrane vesicles, and purified methyltransferase and methylesterase. The chemoattractant aspartate was found to inhibit methylation and stimulate demethylation of MCPs. Escherichia coli radiolabeled membranes in the presence of B. subtilis enzyme do not respond to aspartate by an increase demethylation rate. We also report that B. subtilis MCPs are multiply methylated, demethylation resulting in slower migrating proteins on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels.     

Receptors for chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis.

At least three receptors for chemotaxis toward L-amino acids in Bacillus subtilis could be found with the aid of taxis competition experiments. They are called the asparagine receptor, which detects asparagine and glutamine, the isoleucine receptor, which detects isoleucine, leucine, valine, phenylalanine, serine, threonine, cysteine, and methionine, and the alanine receptor, which detects alanine and proline. Histidine and glycine could not be assigned to one of these receptors. Cysteine and methionine were found to be general inhibitors of chemotaxis and serine was found to be a general stimulator of chemotaxis. Some structural analogues of amino acids were tested for chemotactic activity. The chemotactic activity of B. subtilis is compared with that of Escherichia coli.     

Methyl esterification of glutamic acid residues of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis.

The amino acid residue modified in the reversible methylation of Bacillus subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins was identified as glutamic acid; methylation results in the formation of glutamate 5-methyl ester. Identification was made by comparing the behaviour of a 3H-labelled compound isolated from proteolytically hydrolysed methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins labelled in vivo with that of authentic methylated amino acids by chromatographic and electrophoretic techniques. Also, the isolated compound on mild alkaline hydrolysis shows behaviour identical with that of authentic glutamate 5-methyl ester. [3H]Methanol released by mild alkaline hydrolysis was made to react with 3,5-dinitrobenzyl chloride to form [3H]methyl 3,5-dinitrobenzoate, which was identified by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography.     

Novel methyl transfer during chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis

If Bacillus subtilis is incubated in radioactive methionine in the absence of protein synthesis, the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) become radioactively methylated. If the bacteria are further incubated in excess nonradioactive methionine ("cold-chased") and then given the attractant aspartate, the MCPs lose about half of their radioactivity due to turnover, in which lower specific activity methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) replace higher specific activity ones. Due to the cold-chase, the specific activity of the AdoMet pool is reduced at least 2-fold. If, later, the attractant is removed, higher specific activity methyl groups return to the MCPs. Thus, there must exist an unidentified methyl carrier that can "reversibly" receive methyl groups from the MCPs. In a similar experiment, labeled cells were transferred to a flow cell and exposed to addition and removal of attractant and of repellent. All four kinds of stimuli were found to cause methanol production. Bacteria with maximally labeled MCPs were exposed to many cycles of addition and removal of attractant; the maximum amount of radioactive methanol was evolved on the third, not the first, cycle. This result suggests that there is a precursor-product relationship between methyl groups on the MCPs and on the unidentified carrier, which might be the direct source of methanol. However, since no methanol was produced when a methyltransferase mutant, whose MCPs were unmethylated, was exposed to addition and removal of attractant or repellent, the methanol must ultimately derive from methylated MCPs.     

The three adaptation systems of Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis

Adaptation has a crucial role in the gradient-sensing mechanism that underlies bacterial chemotaxis. The Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway uses a single adaptation system involving reversible receptor methylation. In Bacillus subtilis, the chemotaxis pathway seems to use three adaptation systems. One involves reversible receptor methylation, although quite differently than in E. coli. The other two involve CheC, CheD and CheV, which are chemotaxis proteins not found in E. coli. Remarkably, no one system is absolutely required for adaptation or is independently capable of generating adaptation. In this review, we discuss these three novel adaptation systems in B. subtilis and propose a model for their integration.     

Independence of proline chemotaxis and transport in Bacillus subtilis.

Values of KI for nine proline analogs as inhibitors of proline chemotaxis and of proline transport were determined. Two of them inhibited transport at substantially lower concentrations than chemotaxis; two at substantially higher concentrations. Moreover, mutants, believed to be in the component that binds proline, were isolated that showed a shift of KM for transport to higher concentrations, one as much as 40-fold. However, chemotaxis was virtually unaffected. Therefore, unlike galactose chemotaxis and transport in Escherichia coli, which share the galactose-binding protein, proline chemotaxis and transport in Bacillus subtilis are independent.     

Effect of methionine on chemotaxis by Bacillus subtilis.

Bacillus subtilis, like Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, carries out chemotaxis by modulating the relative frequency of smooth swimming and tumbling. Like these enteric bacteria, methionine auxotrophs starved for methionine show an abnormally long-period of smooth swimming after addition of attractant. This "hypersensitive" state requires an hour of starvation for its genesis, which can be hastened by including alanine, a strong attractant, in starvation medium. Susceptibility to repellent, which causes transient tumbling when added, if anything, increases slightly by starvation for methionine. The results are interpreted by postulating the existence of a methionine-derived structure that hastens recovery of attractant-stimulated bacteria back to normal.     

Permeabilization of Bacillus subtilis to chemotaxis methyltransferase II.

Treatment of Bacillus subtilis with 0.4% (vol/vol) toluene renders cells permeable not only to small molecules but also apparently to proteins as large as 30,000 daltons. Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins and two smaller polypeptides were methylated when B. subtilis methyltransferase II was added to permeabilized cells.     

General stress proteins in Bacillus subtilis

Abstract Bacillus cells frequently faced with various adverse environmental factors in nature have evolved different adaptational strategies. The induction of stress proteins is an essential component of this adaptational network. In Bacillus subtilis there are two groups of stress proteins. The first group is factor specific, whereas the second group is induced by growth restrictive conditions in general. The relationship between the stringent response and the induction of stress proteins is discussed.     

Methanol production during chemotaxis to amino acids in Bacillus subtilis

The 20 common amino acids act as attractants during chemotaxis by the Gram-positive organism Bacillus subtilis . In this study, we report that all amino acids induce B. subtilis to produce methanol both upon addition and removal of the chemoeffector. Asparagine-induced methanol production is specific to the McpB receptor and aspartate-induced methanol production correlates with receptor occupancy. These findings suggest that addition and removal of all amino acids cause demethylation of specific receptors which results in methanol production. We also demonstrate that certain attractants cause greater production of methanol after multiple stimulations. CheC and CheD, while affecting the levels of receptor methylation, are not absolutely required for either methylation or demethylation. In contrast, CheY is necessary for methanol formation upon removal of attractant but not upon addition of attractant. We conclude that methanol formation due to negative stimuli indicates the existence of a unique adaptational mechanism in B. subtilis involving the response regulator, CheY.     

Methyl transfer in chemotaxis toward sugars by Bacillus subtilis.

Like amino acids, the sugars glucose and the nonmetabolizable 2-deoxyglucose caused a turnover of methyl groups on the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. These sugars also caused methanol formation on addition. Thus, in contrast to chemotaxis in Escherichia coli, taxis to phosphotransferase sugars by Bacillus subtilis utilizes the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins.     

Evidence for an intermediate methyl-acceptor for chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis responds to chemotactic attractants by demethylating certain membrane-bound proteins, termed methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) and by augmenting the evolution of methanol. We propose that the methanol comes from a methylated intermediate rather than directly from the MCPs themselves. First, repellent blocks attractant-induced smooth swimming and methanol formation, but not MCP demethylation. Second, prior treatment of cells with much attractant to reduce radiolabeling of MCPs and increase that of the putative intermediate caused increased, rather than decreased, production of methanol upon addition and then removal of the repellent. Third, such cells also produced much, rather than little, methanol upon addition of less attractant than during the pretreatment. We speculate that unmethylated intermediate causes tumbling; attractant causes its methylation and hence absence of tumbling (smooth swimming). Its demethylation during the period of smooth swimming affords adaptation.     

Complementation and characterization of chemotaxis mutants of Bacillus subtilis.

A set of chemotaxis mutants of Bacillus subtilis was complemented by using SP beta c2 transducing bacteriophage either containing cloned segments of DNA or derived from abnormal excision of SP beta c2 dl2::Tn917 inserted into the chemotaxis region. Representative mutants were characterized in capillary assays for chemotaxis toward four amino acids and mannitol and in tethered-cell experiments for addition and removal of two attractants and two repellents. Twenty complementation groups were identified, in addition to the cheR previously characterized. All were found to be defective in chemotaxis toward all chemoeffectors. They were assigned the names cheA through cheU. The large number of general chemotaxis genes in B. subtilis, in contrast to the six in Escherichia coli, suggests fundamental differences in the mechanism of chemotaxis in the two species.     

Acid-soluble spore proteins of Bacillus subtilis

Acid-soluble spore proteins (ASSPs) comprise about 5% of the total protein of mature spores of different Bacillus subtilis strains. They consist of three abundant species, alpha, beta, and gamma, four less abundant species, and several minor species, alpha, beta, and gamma make up about 18, 18 and 36%, respectively, of the total ASSPs of strain 168, have molecular weights of 5,900, 5,9000, and 11,000, respectively, and resemble the major (A, C, and B) components of Bacillus megaterium ASSPs in several respects, including sensitivity to a specific B. megaterium spore endopeptidase. However, they have pI's of 6.58, 6.67, and 7.96, all lower than those of any of the B. megaterium ASSPs. Although strains varied in the proportions of different ASSPs, to overall patterns seen on gel electrophoresis are constant. ASSPs are located interior to the cortex, presumably in the spore cytoplasm, and are synthesized during sporulation and degraded during germination.     

Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis: a deviation from the Escherichia coli paradigm

In Escherichia coli, chemotactic sensory transduction is believed to involve phosphoryl transfer for excitation, and changes in receptor methylation for adaptation. In Bacillus subtilis, changes in degree of receptor methylation do not bring about adaptation. Novel methylation reactions are believed to be involved in excitation in B. subtilis. The main chemotaxis proteins of E. coli--CheA, CheB, CheR, CheW and CheY--are present in B. subtilis but play somewhat different roles in the two organisms. Several unique chemotaxis proteins are also present in B. subtilis. Some of the properties of B. subtilis chemotaxis are also seen in Halobacterium halobium, suggesting that there may be a similar underlying mechanism that predates the evolutionary separation of the bacteria from the archaea and eucarya.     

Competence proteins in Bacillus subtilis com mutants

The synthesis of nucleases and proteins specific for competence development have been studied in four different Bacillus subtilis competence-deficient mutants. The nuclease analysis showed that two DNA-binding-deficient mutants were impaired in three nuclease activities involved in binding and entry of donor DNA. The other two strains did not show any reduction in nuclease activities. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the proteins, synthesized during competence development, revealed that all four mutants are lacking several competence-specific polypeptides. Our data show that these com mutations have a strong pleiotropic effect, which could be due to a block in the metabolic pathway leading to competence development.