Single‐nucleotide and long‐patch base excision repair of DNA damage in plants

Base excision repair (BER) is a critical pathway in cellular defense against endogenous or exogenous DNA damage. This elaborate multistep process is initiated by DNA glycosylases that excise the damaged base, and continues through the concerted action of additional proteins that finally restore DNA to the unmodified state. BER has been subject to detailed biochemical analysis in bacteria, yeast and animals, mainly through in vitro reproduction of the entire repair reaction in cell‐free extracts. However, an understanding of this repair pathway in plants has consistently lagged behind. We report the extension of BER biochemical analysis to plants, using Arabidopsis cell extracts to monitor repair of DNA base damage in vitro. We have used this system to demonstrate that Arabidopsis cell extracts contain the enzymatic machinery required to completely repair ubiquitous DNA lesions, such as uracil and abasic (AP) sites. Our results reveal that AP sites generated after uracil excision are processed both by AP endonucleases and AP lyases, generating either 5′‐ or 3′‐blocked ends, respectively. We have also found that gap filling and ligation may proceed either through insertion of just one nucleotide (short‐patch BER) or several nucleotides (long‐patch BER). This experimental system should prove useful in the biochemical and genetic dissection of BER in plants, and contribute to provide a broader picture of the evolution and biological relevance of DNA repair pathways.     

Suppression of base excision repair reactions by apoptotic 24kDa-fragment of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 in bovine testis nuclear extract

In this study, we examined the interaction of PARP1 and its apoptotic 24kDa-fragment with DNA duplexes mimicking different stages/pathways of base excision repair (BER) using a photocross-linking technique combined to in vitro functional assay. We found that endogenous PARP1 was photocross-linked to the gapped, nicked and flap containing DNA structures and its apoptotic 24kDa-fragment (p24), like PARP1, can interact with the same BER DNA intermediates. Effects of exogenous p24 on the repair of DNA duplexes containing a one nucleotide gap with furan phosphate or phosphate group at the 5'-end of the downstream primer were studied in bovine testis nuclear extract. We showed that the interaction of p24 with DNA, as a whole, inhibited the BER reactions. However, gap filling and nick sealing catalyzed by the enzymes of the extract with DNA substrates characteristic for short patch (SP) BER pathway cannot be completely inhibited by p24. In contrast, binding of p24 to DNA duplex with a 5'-furan or a 5'-flap at the 5'-side of a nick inhibits strand-displacement DNA synthesis and activity of FEN1 in the repair of DNA via long patch (LP) BER pathway. Stimulation of the LP BER reactions induced by the addition of FEN1 or PCNA to the extract is suppressed by p24 thereby indicating that p24 can efficiently compete with these proteins of LP BER. Addition of pol beta to the extract can partially overcome the inhibitory effect of p24 and restore strand-displacement DNA synthesis. Thus, the apoptotic 24kDa-fragment of PARP1 may be considered as more efficient in inhibition of the LP than SP pathway and the effect may depend on the ratio of p24 to the repair enzymes catalyzing precise stages of BER.     

S‐sulfhydration of MEK1 leads to PARP‐1 activation and DNA damage repair

The repair of DNA damage is fundamental to normal cell development and replication. Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is a novel gasotransmitter that has been reported to protect cellular aging. Here, we show that H₂S attenuates DNA damage in human endothelial cells and fibroblasts by S‐sulfhydrating MEK1 at cysteine 341, which leads to PARP‐1 activation. H₂S‐induced MEK1 S‐sulfhydration facilitates the translocation of phosphorylated ERK1/2 into nucleus, where it activates PARP‐1 through direct interaction. Mutation of MEK1 cysteine 341 inhibits ERK phosphorylation and PARP‐1 activation. In the presence of H₂S, activated PARP‐1 recruits XRCC1 and DNA ligase III to DNA breaks to mediate DNA damage repair, and cells are protected from senescence.     

Binding kinetics and activity of human poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 on oligo‐deoxyribonucleotide substrates

Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 (PARP‐1) is a mammalian enzyme that attaches long branching chains of ADP‐ribose to specific nuclear proteins, including itself. Because its activity in vitro is dependent upon interaction with broken DNA, it has been postulated that PARP‐1 plays an important role in DNA strand‐break repair in vivo. The exact mechanism of binding to DNA and the structural determinants of binding remain to be defined, but regions of transition from single‐stranded to double‐strandedness may be important recognition sites. Here we employ surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to investigate this hypothesis. Oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) substrates that mimic DNA with different degrees of single‐strandedness were used for measurements of both PARP‐1/DNA binding kinetics and PARP‐1's enzyme activities. We found that binding correlated with activity, but was unrelated to single‐strandedness of the ODN. Instead, PARP‐1 binding and activity were highest on ODNs that modeled a DNA double‐strand break (DSB). These results provide support for PARP‐1 recognizing and binding DSBs in a manner that is independent of single‐stranded features, and demonstrate the usefulness of SPR for simultaneously investigating both PARP‐1 binding and PARP‐1 auto‐poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation activities within the same in vitro system. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Influence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and its apoptotic 24-kD fragment on repair of DNA duplexes in bovine testis nuclear extract

Effects of exogenous proteins poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) and its 24-kD proteolytic fragment (p24) on the repair of DNA duplexes containing a one nucleotide gap with furan phosphate or phosphate group at the 5'-end of the downstream primer were studied in bovine testis nuclear extract. These damaged DNAs are repaired by the long-patch or short-patch subpathways of base excision repair (BER), respectively. Exogenous PARP1 and p24 decreased the efficiency of gap filling DNA synthesis for both duplexes, but did not influence the ligation stage in the repair of DNA duplex by the short-patch subpathway. Under the same conditions, these proteins inhibited strand-displacement DNA synthesis and decreased the efficiency of the flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1)-catalyzed endonuclease reaction in the nuclear extract, blocking repair of DNA duplex by the long-patch subpathway. Addition of exogenous PARP1 and p24 also reduced the efficiency of UV light crosslinking of extract BER proteins to the photoreactive BER intermediates carrying a nick. Thus, PARP1 and p24 interact with DNA intermediates of BER and compete with nuclear extract proteins for binding to DNA. The interaction of PARP1 and p24 with DNA intermediates of the long-patch subpathway of BER resulted in inhibition of subsequent stages of the repair mediated by this mechanism. However, on recovery of the intact structure of DNA duplex by the short-patch subpathway, PARP1 and p24 suppressed the repair of the one nucleotide gap less efficiently and failed to influence the final stage of the repair, ligation.     

MHF1 plays Fanconi anaemia complementation group M protein (FANCM)‐dependent and FANCM‐independent roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination in plants

Fanconi anaemia complementation group M protein (FANCM), a component of the human Fanconi anemia pathway, acts as DNA translocase that is essential during the repair of DNA interstrand cross‐links. The DNA‐damage‐binding function of FANCM is strongly enhanced by the histone fold‐containing FANCM‐associated protein MHF1. We identified a single homologue of MHF1 in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Similar to the loss of AtFANCM, the loss of AtMHF1 leads to several meiotic defects, such as chromosome bridges between bivalents and an unequal distribution of chromosomes. Moreover, MHF1, together with FANCM, is involved in interstrand cross‐link repair in plants. This phenotype is detectable only in double mutants of the RecQ helicase and BLM homologue RECQ4A, which appears to function in a parallel pathway to the FANCM/MHF1 complex. However, in somatic cells, FANCM has an MHF1‐independent function in replicative repair in a parallel pathway to the endonuclease MUS81. Furthermore, MHF1 is required for efficient somatic homologous recombination (HR) – a role antagonistic to FANCM. FANCM and RECQ4A define two parallel pathways of HR suppression in Arabidopsis. Hyperrecombination in the fancm but not the recq4A mutant can be abolished by MHF1 mutations. This finding indicates that MHF1 and FANCM act at different steps of a single, common, HR pathway.     

Disruption of PARP1 function inhibits base excision repair of a sub-set of DNA lesions

The repair of endogenously induced DNA damage is essential to maintain genomic integrity. It has been shown that XRCC1 and PARP1 are involved in the repair of base lesions and SSBs, although the exact mode of action has yet to be determined. Here we show that XRCC1 is involved in the repair of base lesions and SSBs independent of the cell cycle. However, the rate of repair of damage requiring XRCC1 does reflect the damage complexity. The repair of induced DNA damage occurs by PARP1-dependent and PARP1-independent sub-pathways of BER. It is suggested that the repair of SSBs and purine base damage is by a sub-pathway of BER that requires both XRCC1 and PARP1. Repair of pyrimidine base damage may require XRCC1 but does not require PARP1 activity. Therefore, although BER of simple lesions occurs rapidly, pathway choice and the involvement of PARP1 are highly dependent on the types of lesion induced.     

RECQ1 plays a distinct role in cellular response to oxidative DNA damage

RECQ1 is the most abundant RecQ homolog in humans but its functions have remained mostly elusive. Biochemically, RECQ1 displays distinct substrate specificities from WRN and BLM, indicating that these RecQ helicases likely perform non-overlapping functions. Our earlier work demonstrated that RECQ1-deficient cells display spontaneous genomic instability. We have obtained key evidence suggesting a unique role of RECQ1 in repair of oxidative DNA damage. We show that similar to WRN, RECQ1 associates with PARP-1 in nuclear extracts and exhibits direct protein interaction in vitro. Deficiency in WRN or BLM helicases have been shown to result in reduced homologous recombination and hyperactivation of PARP under basal condition. However, RECQ1-deficiency did not lead to PARP activation in undamaged cells and nor did it result in reduction in homologous recombination repair. In stark contrast to what is seen in WRN-deficiency, RECQ1-deficient cells hyperactivate PARP in a specific response to H₂O₂ treatment. RECQ1-deficient cells are more sensitive to oxidative DNA damage and exposure to oxidative stress results in a rapid and reversible recruitment of RECQ1 to chromatin. Chromatin localization of RECQ1 precedes WRN helicase, which has been shown to function in oxidative DNA damage repair. However, oxidative DNA damage-induced chromatin recruitment of these RecQ helicases is independent of PARP activity. As other RecQ helicases are known to interact with PARP-1, this study provides a paradigm to delineate specialized and redundant functions of RecQ homologs in repair of oxidative DNA damage.     

Inhibition of c‐MET increases the antitumour activity of PARP inhibitors in gastric cancer models

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Activation of c‐MET increases tumour cell survival through the initiation of the DNA damage repair pathway. PARP is an essential key in the DNA damage repair pathway. The primary role of PARP is to detect and initiate an immediate cellular response to single‐strand DNA breaks. Tumours suppressor genes such as BRCA1/2 are closely associated with the DNA repair pathway. In BRCA1/2 mutations or deficiency status, cells are more likely to develop additional genetic alterations and chromosomal instability and can lead to cancer. In this study, we investigate the role of c‐MET and PARP inhibition in a gastric cancer model. We exploited functional in vitro and in vivo experiments to assess the antitumour potential of co‐inhibition of c‐MET (SU11274) and PARP (NU1025). This leads to a reduction of gastric cancer cells viability, especially after knockdown of BRCA1/2 through apoptosis and induction of γ‐Η2ΑΧ. Moreover, in AGS xenograft models, the combinatorial treatment of NU1025 plus SU11274 reduced tumour growth and triggers apoptosis. Collectively, our data may represent a new therapeutic approach for GC thought co‐inhibition of c‐MET and PARP, especially for patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency tumours.     

A Single-Molecule Atomic Force Microscopy Study of PARP1 and PARP2 Recognition of Base Excision Repair DNA Intermediates

Nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases 1 and 2 (PARP1 and PARP2) catalyze the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and use NAD⁺ as a substrate for the polymer synthesis. Both PARP1 and PARP2 are involved in DNA damage response pathways and function as sensors of DNA breaks, including temporary single-strand breaks formed during DNA repair. Consistently, with a role in DNA repair, PARP activation requires its binding to a damaged DNA site, which initiates PAR synthesis. Here we use atomic force microscopy to characterize at the single-molecule level the interaction of PARP1 and PARP2 with long DNA substrates containing a single damage site and representing intermediates of the short-patch base excision repair (BER) pathway. We demonstrated that PARP1 has higher affinity for early intermediates of BER than PARP2, whereas both PARPs efficiently interact with the nick and may contribute to regulation of the final ligation step. The binding of a DNA repair intermediate by PARPs involved a PARP monomer or dimer depending on the type of DNA damage. PARP dimerization influences the affinity of these proteins to DNA and affects their enzymatic activity: the dimeric form is more effective in PAR synthesis in the case of PARP2 but is less effective in the case of PARP1. PARP2 suppresses PAR synthesis catalyzed by PARP1 after single-strand breaks formation. Our study suggests that the functions of PARP1 and PARP2 overlap in BER after a site cleavage and provides evidence for a role of PARP2 in the regulation of PARP1 activity.     

A unified view of base excision repair: lesion-dependent protein complexes regulated by post-translational modification

Base excision repair (BER) proteins act upon a significantly broad spectrum of DNA lesions that result from endogenous and exogenous sources. Multiple sub-pathways of BER (short-path or long-patch) and newly designated DNA repair pathways (e.g., SSBR and NIR) that utilize BER proteins complicate any comprehensive understanding of BER and its role in genome maintenance, chemotherapeutic response, neuro-degeneration, cancer or aging. Herein, we propose a unified model of BER, comprised of three functional processes: Lesion Recognition/Strand Scission, Gap Tailoring and DNA Synthesis/Ligation, each represented by one or more multi-protein complexes and coordinated via the XRCC1/DNA Ligase III and PARP1 scaffold proteins. BER therefore may be represented by a series of repair complexes that assemble at the site of the DNA lesion and mediates repair in a coordinated fashion involving protein-protein interactions that dictate subsequent steps or sub-pathway choice. Complex formation is influenced by post-translational protein modifications that arise from the cellular state or the DNA damage response, providing an increase in specificity and efficiency to the BER pathway. In this review, we have summarized the reported BER protein-protein interactions and protein post-translational modifications and discuss the impact on DNA repair capacity and complex formation.     

The type of DNA glycosylase determines the base excision repair pathway in mammalian cells.

The base excision repair (BER) of modified nucleotides is initiated by damage-specific DNA glycosylases. The repair of the resulting apurinic/apyrimidinic site involves the replacement of either a single nucleotide (short patch BER) or of several nucleotides (long patch BER). The mechanism that controls the selection of either BER pathway is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the type of base damage present on DNA, by determining the specific DNA glycosylase in charge of its excision, drives the repair of the resulting abasic site intermediate to either BER branch. In mammalian cells hypoxanthine (HX) and 1,N6-ethenoadenine (epsilonA) are both substrates for the monofunctional 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase, the ANPG protein, whereas 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is removed by the bifunctional DNA glycosylase/beta-lyase 8-oxoG-DNA gly- cosylase (OGG1). Circular plasmid molecules containing a single HX, epsilonA, or 8-oxoG were constructed. In vitro repair assays with HeLa cell extracts revealed that HX and epsilonA are repaired via both short and long patch BER, whereas 8-oxoG is repaired mainly via the short patch pathway. The preferential repair of 8-oxoG by short patch BER was confirmed by the low efficiency of repair of this lesion by DNA polymerase beta-deficient mouse cells as compared with their wild-type counterpart. These data fit into a model where the intrinsic properties of the DNA glycosylase that recognizes the lesion selects the branch of BER that will restore the intact DNA template.     

Repair of oxidative DNA damage

Cellular genomes suffer extensive damage from exogenous agents and reactive oxygen species formed during normal metabolism. The MutT homologs (MutT/MTH) remove oxidized nucleotide precursors so that they cannot be incorporated into DNA during replication. Among many repair pathways, the base excision repair (BER) pathway is the most important cellular protection mechanism responding to oxidative DNA damage. The 8-oxoG glycosylases (Fpg or MutM/OGG) and the MutY homologs (MutY/MYH) glycosylases along with MutT/MTH protect cells from the mutagenic effects of 8-oxoG, the most stable and deleterious product known caused by oxidative damage to DNA. The key enzymes in the BER process are DNA glycosylases, which remove different damaged bases by cleavage of the N-glycosylic bonds between the bases and the deoxyribose moieties of the nucleotide residues. Biochemical and structural studies have demonstrated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of strated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of several glycosylases show that the substrate base flips out of the sharply bent DNA helix and the minor groove is widened to be accessed by the glycosylases. To complete the repair after glycosylase action, the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is further processed by an incision step, DNA synthesis, an excision step, and DNA ligation through two alternative pathways. The short-patch BER (1-nucleotide patch size) and long-patch BER (2–6-nucleotide patch size) pathways need AP endonuclease to generate a 3′ hydroxyl group but require different sets of enzymes for DNA synthesis and ligation. Protein-protein interactions have been reported among the enzymes involved in BER. It is possible that the successive players in the repair pathway are assembled in a complex to perform concerted actions. The BER pathways are proposed to protect cells and organisms from mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Deficiency of terminal ADP‐ribose protein glycohydrolase TARG1/C6orf130 in neurodegenerative disease

Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐ribosylation is a post‐translational protein modification implicated in the regulation of a range of cellular processes. A family of proteins that catalyse ADP‐ribosylation reactions are the poly(ADP‐ribose) (PAR) polymerases (PARPs). PARPs covalently attach an ADP‐ribose nucleotide to target proteins and some PARP family members can subsequently add additional ADP‐ribose units to generate a PAR chain. The hydrolysis of PAR chains is catalysed by PAR glycohydrolase (PARG). PARG is unable to cleave the mono(ADP‐ribose) unit directly linked to the protein and although the enzymatic activity that catalyses this reaction has been detected in mammalian cell extracts, the protein(s) responsible remain unknown. Here, we report the homozygous mutation of the c6orf130 gene in patients with severe neurodegeneration, and identify C6orf130 as a PARP‐interacting protein that removes mono(ADP‐ribosyl)ation on glutamate amino acid residues in PARP‐modified proteins. X‐ray structures and biochemical analysis of C6orf130 suggest a mechanism of catalytic reversal involving a transient C6orf130 lysyl‐(ADP‐ribose) intermediate. Furthermore, depletion of C6orf130 protein in cells leads to proliferation and DNA repair defects. Collectively, our data suggest that C6orf130 enzymatic activity has a role in the turnover and recycling of protein ADP‐ribosylation, and we have implicated the importance of this protein in supporting normal cellular function in humans.     

Regulatory roles of p21 and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 in base excision repair

Many types of DNA damage induce a cellular response that inhibits replication but allows repair by up-regulating the p53 pathway and inducing p21(Cip1, Waf1, Sdi1). The p21 regulatory protein can bind proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and prohibit DNA replication. We show here that p21 also inhibits PCNA stimulation of long patch base excision repair (BER) in vitro. p21 disrupts PCNA-directed stimulation of flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), DNA ligase I, and DNA polymerase delta. The dilemma is to understand how p21 prevents DNA replication but allows BER in vivo. Differential regulation by p21 is likely to relate to the utilization of DNA polymerase beta, which is not sensitive to p21, in the repair pathway. We have also found that apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) stimulates long patch BER. Furthermore, neither APE1 activity nor its ability to stimulate long patch BER is significantly affected by p21 in vitro. We propose that APE1 serves as an assembly and coordination factor for long patch BER proteins. APE1 initially cleaves the DNA and then facilitates the sequential binding and catalysis by DNA polymerase beta, DNA polymerase delta, FEN1, and DNA ligase I. This model implies that BER can be regulated differentially, based upon the assembly of relevant proteins around APE1 in the presence or absence of PCNA.     

ATP-dependent selection between single nucleotide and long patch base excision repair

DNA base excision repair (BER) constitutes a major mechanism to restore the integrity of the genome following modifications of nucleobases. Although it is well established that poly(ADP-ribosylation) facilitates BER, the mechanism of this stimulation has remained unknown. Previous observations suggested that poly(ADP-ribose), which is synthesised from NAD(+), could serve as a unique source of ATP required for the ligation step in BER. This pathway of ATP generation is thought to compensate ATP shortage and relies on the release of pyrophosphate during DNA repair synthesis. Here, we present evidence that, in situations of cellular energy depletion, the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) is indeed stimulated. Simultaneously, single nucleotide repair is reduced. Rather, the number of nucleotides incorporated by DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) during DNA repair synthesis is increased. Using a reconstituted system including the recombinant BER proteins Pol beta, AP endonuclease 1 (APE 1), X-ray repair cross-complementing group-1 (XRCC1), DNA ligase III (Lig III), flap endonuclease 1 (FEN 1), and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), it is demonstrated that in the absence of ATP, both long patch DNA synthesis by Pol beta and poly(ADP-ribosylation) catalysed by PARP-1 are stimulated. Consequently, the preferred use of either long patch or single nucleotide BER depends on the availability of ATP. It is proposed that long patch BER is required for ATP generation from poly(ADP-ribose) and, therefore, predominant under conditions of ATP shortage.     

Mutagenicity and DNA repair of glycidamide-induced adducts in mammalian cells

Glycidamide (GA)-induced mutagenesis in mammalian cells is not very well understood. Here, we investigated mutagenicity and DNA repair of GA-induced adducts utilizing Chinese hamster cell lines deficient in base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER) or homologous recombination (HR) in comparison to parent wild-type cells. We used the DRAG assay in order to map pathways involved in the repair of GA-induced DNA lesions. This assay utilizes the principle that a DNA repair deficient cell line is expected to be affected in growth and/or survival more than a repair proficient cell.A significant induction of mutations by GA was detected in the hprt locus of wild-type cells but not in BER deficient cells. Cells deficient in HR or BER were three or five times, respectively, more sensitive to GA in terms of growth inhibition than were wild-type cells. The results obtained on the rate of incisions in BER and NER suggest that lesions induced by GA are repaired by short patch BER rather than long patch BER or NER. Furthermore, a large proportion of the GA-induced lesions gave rise to strand breaks that are repaired by a mechanism not involving PARP. It is suggested that these strand breaks, which might be the results from alkylation of the backbone phosphate, are misrepaired by HR during replication thereby leading to a clastogenic rather than a mutagenic pathway. The type of lesion responsible for the mutagenic effect of GA cannot be concluded from the results presented in this study.     

HYDAMTIQ,a selective PARP‐1 inhibitor,improves bleomycin‐induced lung fibrosis by dampening the TGF‐β/SMAD signalling pathway

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a severe disease characterized by excessive myofibroblast proliferation, extracellular matrix and fibrils deposition, remodelling of lung parenchyma and pulmonary insufficiency. Drugs able to reduce disease progression are available, but therapeutic results are unsatisfactory; new and safe treatments are urgently needed. Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerases‐1 (PARP‐1) is an abundant nuclear enzyme involved in key biological processes: DNA repair, gene expression control, and cell survival or death. In liver and heart, PARP‐1 activity facilitates oxidative damage, collagen deposition and fibrosis development. In this study, we investigated the effects of HYDAMTIQ, a potent PARP‐1 inhibitor, in a murine model of lung fibrosis. We evaluated the role of PARP on transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β) expression and TGF‐β/SMAD signalling pathway in lungs. Mice were intratracheally injected with bleomycin and then treated with either vehicle or different doses of HYDAMTIQ for 21 days. Airway resistance to inflation and lung static compliance, markers of lung stiffness, were assayed. Histochemical and biochemical parameters to evaluate TGF‐β/SMAD signalling pathway with alpha‐smooth muscle actin (αSMA) deposition and the levels of a number of inflammatory markers (tumour necrosis factor‐α, interleukin‐1β, iNOS and COX‐2) were performed. Bleomycin administration increased lung stiffness. It also increased lung PARP activity, TGF‐β levels, pSMAD3 expression, αSMA deposition and content of inflammatory markers. HYDAMTIQ attenuated all the above‐mentioned physiological, biochemical and histopathological markers. Our findings support the proposal that PARP inhibitors could have a therapeutic potential in reducing the progression of signs and symptoms of the disease by decreasing TGF‐β expression and the TGF‐β/SMAD transduction pathway.