组蛋白H3K36甲基化与疾病

组蛋白H3K36位点可以发生甲基化修饰,其修饰状态受到H3K36甲基转移酶和去甲基化酶的动态调控。H3K36的甲基化修饰可引起多种生物学效应,如参与基因的转录激活或抑制、剂量补偿以及基因的选择性剪接等。H3K36甲基化修饰状态的异常与很多疾病相关,因此全面了解H3K36甲基化对于该类疾病的诊断和治疗具有重要意义。     

Shoring up DNA methylation and H3K27me3 domain demarcation at developmental genes

Mutual antagonism between DNA methylation and H3K27me3 histone methylation suggests a dynamic crosstalk between these epigenetic marks that could help ensure correct gene expression programmes. Work from Manzo et al ( 2017 ) now shows that an isoform of de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A provides specificity in the system by depositing DNA methylation at adjacent “shores” of hypomethylated bivalent CpG islands (CGI) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). DNMT3A1‐directed methylation appears to be instructive in maintaining the H3K27me3 profile at the hypomethylated bivalent CGI promoters of developmentally important genes.     

Characterization of H3.3K36M as a tool to study H3K36 methylation in cancer cells

Recurrent mutations at key lysine residues in the histone variant H3.3 are thought to play an etiologic role in the development of distinct subsets of pediatric gliomas and bone and cartilage cancers. H3.3K36M is one such mutation that was originally identified in chondroblastomas, and its expression in these tumors contributes to oncogenic reprogramming by triggering global depletion of dimethylation and trimethylation at H3K36 with a concomitant increase in the levels of H3K27 trimethylation. H3.3K36M expression can also cause epigenomic changes in cell types beyond chondrocytic cells. Here we show that expression of H3.3K36M in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cancer cells severely impairs cellular proliferation, which contrasts its role in promoting transformation of chondrocytic cells. H3.3K36M-associated cellular toxicity phenocopies the specific depletion of H3K36me2, but not loss of H3K36me3. We further find that the H3K36me2-associated toxicity is largely independent of changes in H3K27me3. Together, our findings lend support to the argument that H3K36me2 has distinct roles in cancer cells independent of H3K36me3 and H3K27me3, and highlight the use of H3.3K36M as an epigenetic tool to study H3K36 and H3K27 methylation dynamics in diverse cell types.     

Recognition of H3K9me1 by maize RNA-directed DNA methylation factor SHH2

RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) is a plant-specific de novo DNA methylation pathway, which has extensive cross-talk with histone modifications. Here, we report that the maize RdDM regulator SAWADEE HOMEODOMAIN HOMOLOG 2 (SHH2) is an H3K9me1 reader. Our structural studies reveal that H3K9me1 recognition is achieved by recognition of the methyl group via a classic aromatic cage and hydrogen-bonding and salt-bridge interactions with the free protons of the mono-methyllysine. The di- and tri-methylation states disrupt the polar interactions, decreasing the binding affinity. Our study reveals a mono-methyllysine recognition mechanism which potentially links RdDM to H3K9me1 in maize.     

Both combinatorial K4me0-K36me3 marks on sister histone H3s of a nucleosome are required for Dnmt3a-Dnmt3L mediated de novo DNA methylation

A nucleosome contains two copies of each histone H2A,H2B,H3 and H4.Histone H3 K4me0 and K36me3are two key chromatin marks for de novo DNA methylation catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases in mammals.However,it remains unclear whether K4me0 and K36me3 marks on both sister histone H3s regulate de novo DNA methylation independently or cooperatively.Here,taking advantage of the bivalent histone H3 system in yeast,we examined the contributions of K4 and K36 on sister histone H3s to genomic DNA methylation catalyzed by ectopically co-expressed murine Dnmt3a and Dnmt3L.The results show that lack of both K4me0 and K36me3 on one sister H3 tail,or lack of K4me0 and K36me3 on respective sister H3s results in a dramatic reduction of 5mC,revealing a synergy of two sister H3s in DNA methylation regulation.Accordingly,the Dnmt3a or Dnmt3L mutation that disrupts the interaction of Dnmt3aADD domain-H3K4me0,Dnmt3LADD domain-H3K4me0,orDnmt3aPWWP domain-H3K36me3 causes a significant reduction of DNA methylation.These results support the model that each heterodimeric Dnmt3a-Dnmt3L reads both K4me0 and K36me3 marks on one tail of sister H3s,and the dimer of heterodimeric Dnmt3a-Dnmt3L recognizes two tails of sister histone H3s to efficiently execute de novo DNA methylation.     

PGC7, H3K9me2 and Tet3: regulators of DNA methylation in zygotes

In zygotes, a global loss of DNA methylation occurs selectively in the paternal pronucleus before the first cell division, concomitantly with the appearance of modified forms of 5-methylcytosine. The adjacent maternal pronucleus and certain paternally-imprinted loci are protected from this process. Nakamura et al. recently clarified the molecular mechanism involved: PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 binds to dimethylated histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2), thereby blocking the activity of the Tet3 methylcytosine oxidase in the maternal genome as well as at certain imprinted loci in the paternal genome.DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic modification that regulates imprinting (differential silencing of maternal or paternal alleles) and repression of retrotransposons and other parasitic DNA, as well as possibly X-chromosome inactivation and cellular differentiation. DNA methylation needs to be faithfully maintained throughout the life cycle, since loss of DNA methylation can result in gene dosage problems, dysregulation of gene expression, and genomic instability due to retrotransposon reactivation¹. Nevertheless, genome-wide loss of DNA methylation has been observed during germ cell development² and in the paternal pronucleus soon after fertilization³.For almost a decade, the global decrease of DNA methylation observed in the paternal genome within a few hours of fertilization was ascribed to an “active”, replication-independent process³. The maternal pronucleus is spared and instead undergoes “passive”, replication-dependent demethylation during early embryogenesis, arising from inhibition of the DNA maintenance methyltransferase Dnmt1 (Dnmt1 is normally recruited to newly-replicated DNA because of the high affinity of its obligate partner, UHRF1, for hemi-methylated DNA strands, which are produced from symmetrically-methylated CpG dinucleotides as a result of DNA replication). The basis for active and passive demethylation of the paternal and maternal genomes remained a mystery until proteins of the TET family – TET1, TET2 and TET3 in humans – were discovered to be Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymes capable of oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA^4,5,6. TET enzymes serially convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethyl-cytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxycytosine (5caC)^5,7,8.With the generation of specific antibodies to 5hmC, it became clear that the supposed “active demethylation” of the paternal pronucleus in mouse zygote after fertilization was due to the inability of anti-5mC antibodies to recognize 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products^9,10. The enzyme responsible for 5mC oxidation was shown to be Tet3, which unlike Tet1 and Tet2 is highly expressed in mouse oocytes and zygotes. RNAi-mediated depletion of Tet3 decreased the staining of the paternal pronucleus with 5hmC, suggesting that immediately after fertilization, Tet3 in the zygote selectively oxidizes 5mC in the paternal genome to 5hmC^9,10.How is the maternal pronucleus protected from Tet3 activity? Nakamura et al.¹¹ previously showed that zygotes lacking PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 lose asymmetric regulation of DNA methylation, instead showing global loss of 5mC staining in both paternal and maternal pronuclei. This was correlated with hypomethylation at several maternally-imprinted loci (Peg1, Peg3, Peg10) in PGC7-deficient zygotes, as judged by bisulfite sequencing. Further, certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1), which are normally protected from global loss of methylation in the paternal genome, also became hypomethylated in PGC7-deficient zygotes. These data suggested that PGC7 protects the maternal genome, as well as certain paternally imprinted loci, from loss of 5mC.In their recent publication, Nakamura et al.¹² elegantly extended these findings to address the mechanism involved. Based on the fact that a major difference between maternal and paternal genomes is that the maternal genome contains histones, whereas the DNA of the entering sperm is tightly packaged with protamine, they asked whether PGC7 recognizes specific histone marks. Indeed, the maternal genome harbors considerable levels of the histone mark H3K9me2¹¹, leading them to examine whether PGC7 distinguishes maternal and paternal genomes by recognizing H3K9me2 in the maternal genome. Using wild-type (WT) ES cells and ES cells deficient in the G9a lysine methyltransferase which generates H3K9me2 mark, they showed that PGC7 associated loosely with nucleosomes and chromatin lacking H3K9me2, but tightly if H3K9me2 was present. The binding was recapitulated using recombinant bacterially-expressed PGC7 and histone tail peptides, indicating a direct interaction of PGC7 with the H3K9me2 mark. In agreement, genomic loci enriched with H3K9me2 recruited PGC7 as judged by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), but this recruitment was abrogated in G9a-deficient ES cells. These data indicated that PGC7 targets genomic regions occupied by nucleosomes containing H3K9me2 (Figure 1); an interesting extension would be to ask whether loss of maternal G9a also results in 5hmC conversion in the maternal pronucleus in zygotes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic view of paternal (left) and maternal (right) genomes soon after fertilization. Paternal and maternal pronuclei are indicated with immunostaining results in the boxes. PGC7 binds H3K9me2 in the maternal pronucleus and at certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1) in the paternal pronucleus, thereby potentially regulating chromatin organization to interfere with Tet3 accessibility.Next, Nakamura et al.¹² tested by immunocytochemistry whether PGC7 in zygotes also required H3K9me2. It is known that H3K9me2 staining is concentrated in the maternal but not the paternal pronucleus¹³. Using conventional staining methods in which the cells are first fixed and then permeabilized to allow antibodies to enter the cell, the authors observed in their earlier study that PGC7 bound to both pronuclei¹¹. Remarkably, by simply reversing the order of the fixation and permeabilization steps – permeabilizing first to allow the loss of loosely bound proteins by dissociation, then fixing and staining – they found that PGC7 associated much more tightly with the maternal pronucleus that bears H3K9me2 mark. Injection of mRNA encoding Jhdm2a (an H3K9me1/ me2-specific demethylase) into zygotes eliminated staining for H3K9me2 as well as PGC7 in the maternal pronucleus, and concomitantly caused loss of 5mC and acquisition of 5hmC. Taken together, these data strongly suggested that PGC7 was selectively recruited to the maternal pronucleus through binding H3K9me2, and that this binding protected zygotic maternal DNA from oxidation of 5mC to 5hmC and beyond (Figure 1).These findings led Nakamura et al. to investigate how PGC7 controls Tet3 activity in zygotes. They showed (in cells that were permeabilized before fixation and immunocytochemistry) that Tet3 was tightly associated only with the paternal pronucleus in WT zygotes, but was present in both pronuclei in PGC7-deficient zygotes. When PGC7 was prevented from binding to the maternal pronucleus by injection of Jhdm2a mRNA, Tet3 became tightly associated with both pronuclei. In other words, loss of PGC7 or loss of H3K9me2 that recruits PGC7 had the same effect – eliminating selective association of Tet3 with the paternal genome. The implication is that PGC7 – which preferentially binds the maternal genome – somehow promotes the selective binding of Tet3 to the paternal genome, thus permitting rapid 5mC oxidation in paternal but not maternal DNA (Figure 1).PGC7 is a small protein (150 amino acids (aa) in the mouse, 159 aa in humans) whose sequence is only moderately conserved. Nakamura et al.¹² showed that the binding of PGC7 to H3K9me2 required the N-terminal half of PGC7, whereas its ability to exclude Tet3 from the maternal pronucleus required the C-terminal half. It is unclear how Tet3 exclusion is mediated. One possibility is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 sterically excludes Tet3 from binding, either to DNA or to a chromatin mark; another is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 is capable of altering chromatin configuration to prevent the binding of Tet3 to chromatin. In support of the latter hypothesis, the rate with which micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digested high-molecular weight chromatin was significantly slower in WT ES cells in which PGC7 was present, compared to PGC7^−/− and G9a^−/− ES cells in which PGC7 was either absent or not recruited to DNA because of the loss of H3K9me2 mark. In contrast, DNA methylation did not alter the chromatin association of PGC7 or its ability to protect high-molecular weight chromatin from MNase digestion, as shown by using Dnmt1^−/−Dnmt3a^−/−Dnmt3b^−/− triple knockout ES cells that completely lack DNA methylation.How does PGC7 protect paternally-imprinted loci from Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation? Although the haploid sperm genome is mostly packaged with protamine, a genome-wide analysis revealed that 4% of the genome of mature human sperm bears nucleosomes located at developmental and imprinted genes¹⁴. Nakamura et al.¹² found that among paternally-imprinted differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs contained H3K9me2 whereas the Meg3 DMR did not, consistent with their previous finding that in PGC7-deficient zygotes, the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs were hypomethylated but the Meg3 DMR was unaffected¹¹. Therefore, PGC7 may be recruited to paternally-imprinted loci through H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes that pre-exist in the sperm haploid genome upon fertilization. Alternatively, Nakamura et al. point out that protamine in the sperm is replaced soon after fertilization by the histone H3.3 variant, which in somatic cells does not bear H3K9me2 mark.In conclusion, Nakamura et al.¹² demonstrate unambiguously that PGC7 specifically binds to H3K9me2 in the maternal genome in zygotes, where its global occupancy excludes Tet3 and inhibits Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation. This novel finding provides new insights into the global alterations of DNA methylation status that occur during early embryogenesis. Follow-up questions abound. First, can PGC7 protect other methylated loci such as transposable elements and the X-chromosome? It would be interesting to assess H3K9me2 at these loci. Second, how does the N-terminal half of PGC7 recognize H3K9me2? Structural characterization of this interaction may elucidate a novel epigenetic “reader” domain specific for H3K9me2. Third, PGC7 is a marker for cells of the inner cell mass, and is co-expressed with Tet1 and Tet2 rather than Tet3 in ESCs¹⁵. Does PGC7 also antagonize Tet1 and Tet2 and protect imprinted loci in ESCs? Fourth, how does PGC7 inhibit the access of Tet3 to chromatin? Considering that PGC7 is small and is not equipped with known enzymatic domains, it is likely that PGC-interacting proteins, rather than PGC7 itself, function to regulate chromatin status. Fifth, how is Tet3 recruited to paternal chromatin – are there specific histone or other epigenetic marks that facilitate Tet3 recruitment? Finally, while technically challenging, it seems imperative to identify the target genes of PGC7 and Tet3, by profiling the genomic location of 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products in the paternal and maternal genomes of zygotes from WT, Tet3-deficient and PGC7-deficient mice.     

Dynamics of H3K27me3 methylation and demethylation in plant development

Epigenetic regulation controls multiple aspects of the plant development. The N-terminal tail of histone can be differently modified to regulate various chromatin activities. One of them, the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) confers a repressive chromatin state with gene silencing. H3K27me3 is dynamically deposited and removed throughout development. While components of the H3K27me3 writer, Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), have been reported for almost 2 decades, it is only recently that JUMONJI (JMJ) proteins are reported as H3K27me3 demethylases, affirming the dynamic nature of histone modifications. This review highlights recent progress in plant epigenetic research, focusing on the H3K27me3 demethylases.     

SETDB1/NSD-dependent H3K9me3/H3K36me3 dual heterochromatin maintains gene expression profiles by bookmarking poised enhancers

1. Download : Download high-res image (175KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

The H3K9me2-binding protein AGDP3 limits DNA methylation and transcriptional gene silencing in Arabidopsis

DNA methylation,a conserved epigenetic mark,is critical for tuning temporal and spatial gene expression.The Arabidopsis thaliana DNA glycosylase/lyase REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1(ROS1) initiates active DNA demethylation and is required to prevent DNA hypermethylation at thousands of genomic loci.However,how ROS1 is recruited to specific loci is not well understood.Here,we report the discovery of Arabidopsis AGENET Domain Containing Protein 3(AGDP3) as a cellular factor that is required to prevent g...     

H3K36me2/3 Binding and DNA Binding of the DNA Methyltransferase DNMT3A PWWP Domain Both Contribute to its Chromatin Interaction

The PWWP domain of DNMT3 DNA methyltransferases binds to histone H3 tails containing methylated K36, and this activity is important for heterochromatic targeting. Here, we show that the PWWP domain of mouse DNMT3A binds to H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 with a slight preference for H3K36me2. PWWP domains have also been reported to bind to DNA, and the close proximity of H3K36 and nucleosomal DNA suggests a combined binding to H3K36me2/3 and DNA. We show here that the DNMT3A PWWP domain binds to DNA with a weak preference for AT-rich sequences and that the designed charge reversal R362E mutation disrupts DNA binding. The K295E mutation, as well as K295I recently identified in paraganglioma, a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm, disrupts both DNA and H3K36me2/3 binding, which is in agreement with the proximity of K295 to residues involved in K36me2/3 methyllysine binding. Nucleosome pulldown experiments show that DNA binding and H3K36me2/3 binding are important for the interaction of the DNMT3A PWWP domain with nucleosomes. Localization studies of transiently transfected fluorescently-tagged wild-type and PWWP-mutated full-length DNMT3A indicate that both interactions contribute to the subnuclear localization of DNMT3A in mouse cells. In summary, our data demonstrate that the combined binding of the DNMT3A PWWP domain to the H3 tail containing K36me2/3 and to the nucleosomal or linker DNA is important for its chromatin interaction and subnuclear targeting of DNMT3A in living cells.