Freeze-fracture electron microscopy

The freeze-fracture technique consists of physically breaking apart (fracturing) a frozen biological sample; structural detail exposed by the fracture plane is then visualized by vacuum-deposition of platinum-carbon to make a replica for examination in the transmission electron microscope. The four key steps in making a freeze-fracture replica are (i) rapid freezing, (ii) fracturing, (iii) replication and (iv) replica cleaning. In routine protocols, a pretreatment step is carried out before freezing, typically comprising fixation in glutaraldehyde followed by cryoprotection with glycerol. An optional etching step, involving vacuum sublimation of ice, may be carried out after fracturing. Freeze fracture is unique among electron microscopic techniques in providing planar views of the internal organization of membranes. Deep etching of ultrarapidly frozen samples permits visualization of the surface structure of cells and their components. Images provided by freeze fracture and related techniques have profoundly shaped our understanding of the functional morphology of the cell.     

Bridging fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy

Development of new fluorescent probes and fluorescence microscopes has led to new ways to study cell biology. With the emergence of specialized microscopy units at most universities and research centers, the use of these techniques is well within reach for a broad research community. A major breakthrough in fluorescence microscopy in biology is the ability to follow specific targets on or in living cells, revealing dynamic localization and/or function of target molecules. One of the inherent limitations of fluorescence microscopy is the resolution. Several efforts are undertaken to overcome this limit. The traditional and most well-known way to achieve higher resolution imaging is by electron microscopy. Moreover, electron microscopy reveals organelles, membranes, macromolecules, and thus aids in the understanding of cellular complexity and localization of molecules of interest in relation to other structures. With the new probe development, a solid bridge between fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy is being built, even leading to correlative imaging. This connection provides several benefits, both scientifically as well as practically. Here, I summarize recent developments in bridging microscopy.     

Conventional transmission electron microscopy

Researchers have used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to make contributions to cell biology for well over 50 years, and TEM continues to be an important technology in our field. We briefly present for the neophyte the components of a TEM-based study, beginning with sample preparation through imaging of the samples. We point out the limitations of TEM and issues to be considered during experimental design. Advanced electron microscopy techniques are listed as well. Finally, we point potential new users of TEM to resources to help launch their project.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been an important technology in cell biology ever since it was first used in the early 1940s. The most frequently used TEM application in cell biology entails imaging stained thin sections of plastic-embedded cells by passage of an electron beam through the sample such that the beam will be absorbed and scattered, producing contrast and an image (see

Microwaves for electron microscopy

Microwaves are electromagnetic waves with frequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz, corresponding to wavelengths between 1 m and 1 mm, respectively. Microwaves interact with a wide variety of materials. In fact, they can be used to heat dielectric materials. Diffusion and chemical-reaction rates are influenced by temperature increase. Many authors believe that, if microwave irradiation is optimally applied, the resulting microscopical images are of superior quality, because of good process control.In order to develop good microwave recipes for EM it is important to face the following questions:

• 1.1. What is the influence of microwaves on the reagents?
• 2.2. What are the basic mechanisms behind the procedure?
• 3.3. What is the influence of temperature increase on the reaction rates?
• 4.4. What is the optimal temperature?
• 5.5. Does microwave irradiation cause destruction of, for instance, proteins or membranes?
• 6.6. How to program the microwave oven? How does the load (container with reagent, if any, and specimen) influence the microwave irradiation? How to place the container in the oven?

     

Single particle electron microscopy

Electron microscopy (EM) in combination with image analysis is a powerful technique to study protein structures at low, medium, and high resolution. Since electron micrographs of biological objects are very noisy, improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio by image processing is an integral part of EM, and this is performed by averaging large numbers of individual projections. Averaging procedures can be divided into crystallographic and non-crystallographic methods. The crystallographic averaging method, based on two-dimensional (2D) crystals of (membrane) proteins, yielded in solving atomic protein structures in the last century. More recently, single particle analysis could be extended to solve atomic structures as well. It is a suitable method for large proteins, viruses, and proteins that are difficult to crystallize. Because it is also a fast method to reveal the low-to-medium resolution structures, the impact of its application is growing rapidly. Technical aspects, results, and possibilities are presented.     

Depositing electron microscopy maps

A meeting was held at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) in Hinxton, United Kingdom to discuss recent progress in the development of EMD, a database for maps determined by electron microscopy that is now integrated with MSD, the macromolecular structure database at EBI. This meeting of representatives of many of the major image processing groups in electron microscopy also discussed possible software developments that would ease the documentation and deposition of such datasets. The meeting concluded with a strong endorsement of map deposition in electron microscopy and its linkage with the family of archival databases in biomedical research.     

Transmission electron microscopy of tissue prepared for scanning electron microscopy by ethanol-cryofracturing.

Tissue processed for scanning electron microscopy by ethanol-cryofracturing combined with critical point drying was embedded and sectioned for transmission electron microscopy. Study of specimens cut in a plane passing through the fracture edge indicated that preservation of cellular fine structure of fractured cells was excellent. Even at the most peripheral edge of the fracture there was no evidence that movement of cytoplasmic components occurred to distort the original structural organization of fractured cells. Lack of cytoplasmic detail in ethanol-cryofractographs has been due more to the nature of the fracturing of the tissue and to the obscuring effects of the metal coating than to structural deformation at the fracture edge or to limitations in resolving power of the scanning electron microscope used.     

Electronic detectors for electron microscopy

Due to the increasing popularity of electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM) in the structural analysis of large biological molecules and macro-molecular complexes and the need for simple, rapid and efficient readout, there is a persuasive need for improved detectors. Commercial detectors, based on phosphor/fibre optics-coupled CCDs, provide adequate performance for many applications, including electron diffraction. However, due to intrinsic light scattering within the phosphor, spatial resolution is limited. Careful measurements suggest that CCDs have superior performance at lower resolution while all agree that film is still superior at higher resolution. Consequently, new detectors are needed based on more direct detection, thus avoiding the intermediate light conversion step required for CCDs. Two types of direct detectors are discussed in this review. First, there are detectors based on hybrid technology employing a separate pixellated sensor and readout electronics connected with bump bonds-hybrid pixel detectors (HPDs). Second, there are detectors, which are monolithic in that sensor and readout are all in one plane (monolithic active pixel sensor, MAPS). Our discussion is centred on the main parameters of interest to cryoEM users, viz. detective quantum efficiency (DQE), resolution or modulation transfer function (MTF), robustness against radiation damage, speed of readout, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the number of independent pixels available for a given detector.