The binding of bicarbonate ions to washed chloroplast grana

Radioactive labelling techniques show that isolated broken chloroplasts can take up HCO₃⁻ in the dark. There are two pools of binding sites for this ion on, or within, the thylakoid membranes. A smaller, high affinity pool exists at a concentration of one HCO₃⁻ bound per 380–400 chlorophyll molecules. Removal of HCO₃⁻ bound in this pool requires special conditions and results in greater than 90% inhibition of oxygen evolution. The inhibition is fully reversed when HCO₃⁻ is added back. HCO₃⁻ bound in the small pool does not necessarily exchange with free HCO₃⁻ in the dark or in light. Evidence presented suggests that this site is very near the site of action of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea. A second, much larger, pool of HCO₃⁻ binding sites also exists in a concentration approaching that of the bulk chlorophyll. These sites have a much lower affinity for HCO₃⁻, and their function has not yet been determined.     

pH dependent changes in the reactivity of the primary electron acceptor of System II in spinach chloroplasts to external oxidant and reductant

Changes in the rates of dark oxidation and reduction of the primary electron acceptor of System II by added oxidant and reductant were investigated by measuring the induction of chlorophyll fluorescence under moderate actinic light in 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea-inhibited chloroplasts at pH values between 3.6 and 9.5. It was found that:

1. (1) The rate of dark oxidation of photoreduced primary acceptor was very slow at all the pH values tested without added electron acceptor.

2. (2) The rate was accelerated by the addition of ferricyanide in the whole pH range. It was dependent approximately on the 0.8th power of the ferricyanide concentration.

3. (3) The rate constant for the oxidation of the primary acceptor by ferricyanide was pH-dependent and became high at low pH. The value at pH 3.6 was more than 100 times that at pH 7.8.

4. (4) The pH-dependent change in the rate constant was almost reversible when the chloroplasts were suspended at the original pH after a large pH change (acid treatment).

5. (5) An addition of carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone or heavy metal chelators had little effect on the rate of dark oxidation of the primary acceptor by ferricyanide.

6. (6) The dark reduction of the primary acceptor by sodium dithionite also became faster at low pH.

From these results it is concluded that at low pH the primary acceptor of System II becomes accessible to the added hydrophilic reagents even in the presence of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.     

Identification of S2 as the sensitive state to alkaline photoinactivation of Photosystem II in chloroplasts

1. Chloroplasts have been preilluminated by a sequence of n short saturating flashes immediately before alkalinization to pH 9.3, and brought back 2 min later to pH 7.8. The assay of Photosystem II activity through dichlorophenolindophenol photoreduction, oxygen evolution, fluorescence induction, shows that part of the centers is inactivated and that this part depends on the number of preilluminating flashes (maximum inhibition after one flash) in a way which suggests identification of state S₂ as the target for alkaline inactivation.2. As shown by Reimer and Trebst ((1975) Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 168, 225–232) the inactivation necessitates the presence of gramicidin, which shows that the sensitive site is on the internal side of the thylakoid membrane.3. The electron flow through inactivated Photosystem II is restored by artificial donor addition (diphenylcarbazide or hydroxylamine); this suggests that the water-splitting enzyme itself is blocked. The inactivation is accompanied by a solubilization of bound Mn²⁺ and by the occurrence of EPR Signal II “fast”.4. Glutaraldehyde fixation before the treatment does not prevent the inactivation which thus does not seem to involve a protein structural change.     

The high-energy state of the thylakoid system as indicated by chlorophyll fluorescence and chloroplast shrinkage

Certain long-term fluorescence phenomena observed in intact leaves of higher plants and in isolated chloroplasts show a reverse relationship to light-induced absorbance changes at 535 nm (“chloroplast shrinkage”).

1. 1. In isolated chloroplasts with intact envelopes strong fluorescence quenching upon prolonged illumination with red light is accompanied by an absorbance increase. Both effects are reversed by uncoupling with cyclohexylammonium chloride.

2. 2. The fluorescence quenching is reversed in the dark with kinetics very similar to those of the dark decay of chloroplast shrinkage.

3. 3. In intact leaves under strong illumination with red light in CO₂-free air a low level of variable fluorescence and a strong shrinkage response are observed. Carbon dioxide was found to increase fluorescence and to inhibit shrinkage.

4. 4. Under nitrogen, CO₂ caused fluorescence quenching and shrinkage increase at low concentrations. At higher CO₂ levels fluorescence was increased and shrinkage decreased.

5. 5. In the presence of CO₂, the steady-state yield of fluorescence was lower under nitrogen than under air, whereas chloroplast shrinkage was stimulated in nitrogen and suppressed in air.

6. 6. These results demonstrate that the fluorescence yield does not only depend on the redox state of the quencher Q, but to a large degree also on the high-energy state of the thylakoid system associated with photophosphorylation.

A major site of bicarbonate effect in system II reaction. Evidence from ESR signal IIvf, fast fluorescence yield changes and delayed light emission

In order to determine the major site of bicarbonate action in the electron transport complex of Photosystem II, the following experimental techniques were used: electron spin resonance measurements of Signal II_vf, measurements of chlorophyll a fluorescence yield rise and decay kinetics, and delayed light emission decay. From data obtained using these experimental techniques the following conclusions were made: (1) absence of bicarbonate causes a reversible inactivation of up to 40% of Photosystem II reaction center activity; (2) there is no significant effect of bicarbonate on electron flow from the charge accumulating S state to Z; (3) there is no significant effect of bicarbonate on electron flow from Z to P-680⁺; (4) electron flow from Q^? to the intersystem electron transport pool is inhibited by from 4- to 6-fold under bicarbonate depletion conditions.     

Inhibition of the reoxidation of the secondary electron acceptor of Photosystem II by bicarbonate depletion

In bicarbonate-depleted chloroplasts, the chlorophyll a fluorescence decayed with a halftime of about 150 ms after the third flash, and appreciably faster after the first and second flash of a series of flashes given after a dark period. After the fourth to twentieth flashes, the decay was also slow. After addition of bicarbonate, the decay was fast after all the flashes of the sequence. This indicates that the bicarbonate depletion inhibits the reoxidation of the secondary acceptor R²⁻ by the plastoquinone pool; R is the secondary electron acceptor of pigment system II, as it accepts electrons from the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor (Q⁻). This conclusion is consistent with the measurements of the DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence after a series of flashes in the presence and the absence of bicarbonate, if it is assumed that DCMU not only causes reduction of Q if added in the state QR⁻, but also if added in the state QR²⁻.     

Inhibition of Photosystem II by uncouplers at alkaline pH and its reversal by artificial electron donors

When chloroplasts are aged for 5 min at pH 9.6, or are exposed to uncouplers at pH 8.5–9.0, electron flow from water to Hill acceptors is inhibited. Both treatments induce rapid millisecond dark decay of delayed light emission. 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea-sensitive electron transport through Photosystem II can be regenerated in both types of inhibited chloroplasts by the artificial electron donor, 1,5-diphenylcarbohydrazide. Neither treatment inhibits electron flow through Photosystem I. Uncouplers at alkaline pH, when added in the light, are less effective in producing the inhibition than when added in the dark. These results are interpreted as indicating inhibition of the oxygen-evolving apparatus by alkaline intrathylakoid pH.     

Picosecond time-resolved study of MgCl2-induced chlorophyll fluorescence yield changes from chloroplasts

The MgCl₂-induced chlorophyll fluorescence yield changes in broken chloroplasts, suspended in a cation-free medium, treated with 3,-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and pre-illuminated, has been investigated on a picosecond time scale. Chloroplasts in the low fluorescing state showed a fluorescence decay law of the form exp $\text{?At}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, where A was found to be 0.052 $\text{ps}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, and may be attributed to the rate of spillover from Photosystem II to Photosystem I. Addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ produced a 50% increase in the steady-state fluorescence quantum yield and caused a marked decrease in the decay rate. The fluorescence decay law was found to be predominantly exponential with a 1/e lifetime of 1.6 ns. These results support the hypothesis that cation-induced changes in the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll are related to the variations in the rate of energy transfer from Photosystem II to Photosystem I, rather than to changes in the partitioning of absorbed quanta between the two systems.     

The role of chloride ion in Photosystem II I. Effects of chloride ion on Photosystem II electron transport and on hydroxylamine inhibition

1. Chloroplasts washed with Cl^?-free, low-salt media (pH 8) containing EDTA, show virtually no DCMU-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction. The activity is readily restored when 10 mM Cl^? is added to the reaction mixture. Very similar results were obtained with the other Photosystem II electron acceptor 2,5-dimethylquinone (with dibromothymoquinone), with the Photosystem I electron acceptor FMN, and also with ferricyanide which accepts electrons from both photosystems.2. Strong Cl^?-dependence of Hill activity was observed invariably at all pH values tested (5.5–8.3) and in chloroplasts from three different plants: spinach, tobacco and corn (mesophyll).3. In the absence of added Cl^? the functionally Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts are able to oxidize, through Photosystem II, artificial reductants such as catechol, diphenylcarbazide, ascorbate and H₂O₂ at rates which are 4–12 times faster than the rate of the residual Hill reaction.4. The Cl^?-concentration dependence of Hill activity with dimethylquinone as an electron acceptor is kinetically consistent with the typical enzyme activation mechanism: E(inactive) + Cl^?ag E · Cl^? (active), and the apparent activation constant (0.9 mM at pH 7.2) is unchanged by chloroplast fragmentation.5. The initial phase of the development of inhibition of water oxidation in Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts during the dark incubation with NH₂OH ($\text{1}\text{2}$ H₂SO₄) is 5 times slower when the incubation medium contains Cl^? than when the medium contains NH₂OH alone or NH₂OH plus acetate ion. (Acetate is shown to be ineffective in stimulating O₂ evolution.)6. We conclude that the Cl^?-requiring step is one which is specifically associated with the water-splitting reaction, and suggests that Cl^? probably acts as a cofactor (ligand) of the NH₂OH-sensitive, Mn-containing O₂-evolving enzyme.     

The effect of temperature on the primary reaction of chloroplast Photosystem II Evidence for a temperature-dependent back reaction

The primary reaction of Photosystem II has been studied over the temperature range from −196 to −20 °C. The photooxidation of the reaction-center chlorophyll (P680) was followed by the free-radical electron paramagnetic resonance signal of P680⁺, and the photoreduction of the Photosystem II primary electron acceptor was monitored by the C-550 absorbance change.

At temperatures below −100 °C, the primary reaction of Photosystem II is irreversible. However, at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C a back reaction that is insensitive to 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1′-dimethylurea (DCMU) occurs between P680⁺ and the reduced acceptor.

The amount of reduced acceptor and P680⁺ present under steady-state illumination at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C is small unless high light intensity is used to overcome the competing back reaction. The amount of reduced acceptor present at low light intensity can be increased by adjusting the oxidation-reduction potential so that P680⁺ is reduced by a secondary electron donor (cytochrome b₅₅₉) before P680⁺ can reoxidize the reduced primary acceptor. The photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ and the accompanying photoreduction of C-550 are inhibited by DCMU. The inhibition of C-550 photoreduction by DCMU, the dependence of P680 photooxidation and C-550 photoreduction on light intensity, and the effect of the availability of reduced cytochrome b₅₅₉ on C-550 photoreduction are unique to the temperature range where the Photosystem II primary reaction is reversible and are not observed at lower temperatures.     

Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 and the electron donors in chloroplast Photosystem II

The effect of light on the reaction center of Photosystem II was studied by differential absorption spectroscopy in spinach chloroplasts.

At − 196 °C, continuous illumination results in a parallel reduction of C-550 and oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ high potential. With flash excitation, C-550 is reduced, but only a small fraction of cytochrome b₅₅₉ is oxidized. The specific effect of flash illumination is suppressed if the chloroplasts are preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C.

At − 50 °C, continuous illumination results in the reduction of C-550 but little oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉. However, complete oxidation is obtained if the chloroplasts have been preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C. The effect of preillumination is not observed in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.

A model is discussed for the reaction center, with two electron donors, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and Z, acting in competition. Their respective efficiency is dependent on temperature and on their states of oxidation. The specific effect of flash excitation is attributed to a two-photon reaction, possibly based on energy-trapping properties of the oxidized trap chlorophyll.     

The back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple of photosystem II of photosynthesis

Changes of C-550, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and fluorescence yield induced in chloroplasts by single saturating flashes were studied at low temperature. A single saturating flash at −196°C was quite ineffective in reducing C-550, oxidizing cytochrome b₅₅₉ or increasing the fluorescence yield, presumably because most of the charge separation induced by the flash was dissipated by a direct back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple. The back reaction, which competes with the dark reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor by a secondary electron donor, becomes increasingly important as the temperature is lowered because of the temperature coefficient of the reaction with the secondary donor. The effect of the back reaction is to lower the quantum yield for the production of stable photochemical products by steady irradiation. Assuming a quantum yield of unity for the photoreduction of C-550 at room temperature, the quantum yield for the reaction is about 0.40 at −100°C and 0.27 at −196°C.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

The reduction of artificial electron acceptors at subzero temperatures by chloroplasts suspended in fluid media

1. 1. Chloroplasts can be suspended in aqueous/organic mixtures which are liquid at sub-zero temperatures with a good retention of the ability to reduce artificial electron acceptors. The reduction of ferricyanide and 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol at temperatures above 0δC is about 50% inhibited by 50% (v/v) ethylene glycol. Higher concentrations cause more extensive inhibition.

2. 2. Different solvents were compared on the basis of their ability to cause a given depression of the freezing point of an aqueous solution. Ethylene glycol caused less inhibition of electron transport than glycerol, which in its turn was found to be superior to methanol.

3. 3. The reduction of oxidised 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine could be measured at −25δC in 40% (v/v) ethylene glycol. Using an acceptor with a high extinction coefficient, methyl purple (a derivative of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol) it was possible to observe electron flow at temperatures as low as −40δC in 50% (v/v) ethylene glycol.

4. 4. From studies of the effects of the inhibitors 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone it is suggested that electron flow from the donor side of Photosystem II to the acceptor side of Photosystem I can occur at temperatures at least as low as −25δC. The ultimate electron donor is presumably water but it was not possible to demonstrate this directly.

Effects of cations upon chloroplast membrane subunit interactions and excitation energy distribution

When isolated chloroplasts from mature pea (Pisum sativum) leaves were treated with digitonin under “low salt” conditions, the membranes were extensively solubilized into small subunits (as evidenced by analysis with small pore ultrafilters). From this solubilized preparation, a photochemically inactive chlorophyll · protein complex (chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ ratio, 1.3) was isolated. We suggest that the detergent-derived membrane fragment from mature membranes is a structural complex within the membrane which contains the light-harvesting chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ protein and which acts as a light-harvesting antenna primarily for Photosystem II.Cations dramatically alter the structural interaction of the light-harvesting complex with the photochemically active system II complex. This interaction has been measured by determining the amount of protein-bound chlorophyll b and Photosystem II activity which can be released into dispersed subunits by digitonin treatment of chloroplast lamellae. When cations are present to cause interaction between the Photosystem II complex and the light-harvesting pigment · protein, the combined complexes pellet as a “heavy” membranous fraction during differential centrifugation of detergent treated lamellae. In the absence of cations, the two complexes dissociate and can be isolated in a “light” submembrane preparation from which the light-harvesting complex can be purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation.Cation effects on excitation energy distribution between Photosystems I and II have been monitored by following Photosystem II fluorescence changes under chloroplast incubation conditions identical to those used for detergent treatment (with the exception of chlorophyll concentration differences and omission of detergents). The cation dependency of the pigment · protein complex and Photosystem II reaction center interactions measured by detergent fractionation, and regulation of excitation energy distribution as measured by fluorescence changes, were identical. We conclude that changes in substructural organization of intact membranes, involving cation induced changes in the interaction of intramembranous subunits, are the primary factors regulating the distribution of excitation energy between Photosystems II and I.     

The accessibility of the chloroplast cytochromes ƒ and b-559 to ferricyanide

(1) (a) A concentration range of ferricyanide ( 0.125–0.5 mM) can be found which in the dark causes oxidation of cytochrome ƒ with two distinct kinetic components of comparable amplitude. The slow oxidation has a half time of 1–2 min. (b) The oxidation of cytochrome ƒ by ferricyanide is rapid and monophasic after the chloroplasts are frozen and thawed. (c) The oxidation of cytochrome b-559 by ferricyanide in the dark is mostly monophasic with a time course similar to that of the fast component in the cytochrome ƒ oxidation. (d) Ascorbate reduction of cytochromes ƒ and b-559 appears monophasic. Reduction of cytochrome b-559 by ascorbate is somewhat faster, and that by hydroquinone somewhat slower, than the corresponding reduction of cytochrome ƒ.

(2) (a) The kinetics of dark ferricyanide oxidation of cytochrome ƒ after actinic preillumination in the presence of an electron acceptor are approximately monophasic with a half time of about 30 s and do not show the presence of the slowly oxidized component observed after prolonged dark incubation. (b) The effect of actinic preillumination in altering the time course of ferricyanide oxidation appears to persist for several minutes in the dark. (c) Preillumination causes an increase in the extent of cytochrome b-559 oxidation by low concentrations of ferricyanide. The increase is inhibited if 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea is present during the preillumination. (d) The presence of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea during preillumination does not inhibit the amplitude or rate of ferricyanide oxidation of cytochrome ƒ, although the presence of the inhibitor KCN does cause such inhibition.

(3) It is proposed that a significant fraction of the cytochrome ƒ population resides at a position in the membrane relatively inaccessible to the aqueous interface compared to high potential cytochrome b-559. Actinic illumination would cause a structural or conformational change in the cytochrome ƒ and/or the membrane resulting in an increase in accessibility to this fraction of the cytochrome ƒ population.