Studies on Biodegradation of Kerosene in Soil under Different Bioremediation Strategies

The effectiveness of bioremediation is often a function of the microbial population and how they can be enriched and maintained in an environment. Strategies for inexpensive in situ bioremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons include stimulation of the indigenous microorganisms by introduction of nutrients (biostimulation) and/or through inoculation of an enriched mixed microbial culture into soil (bioaugmentation). To demonstrate the potential use of bioremediation in soil contaminated with kerosene, a laboratory study with the objective of evaluating and comparing the effects of bioattenuation, biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation was performed. The present study dealt with the biodegradation of kerosene in soil under different bioremediation treatment strategies: bioattenuation, biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation, respectively. Each treatment strategy contained 10% (w/w) kerosene in soil as a sole source of carbon and energy. After 5 weeks of remediation, the results revealed that bioattenuation, bioaugmentation, biostimulation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation exhibited 44.1%, 67.8%, 83.1%, and 87.3% kerosene degradation, respectively. Also, the total hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (THDB) count in all the treatments increased with time up till the second week after which it decreased. The highest bacterial growth was observed for combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy. A first-order kinetic model equation was fitted to the biodegradation data to further evaluate the rate of biodegradation and the results showed that the specific degradation rate constant (k) value was comparatively higher for combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy than the values for other treatments. Therefore, value of the kinetic parameter showed that the degree of effectiveness of these bioremediation strategies in the clean up of soil contaminated with kerosene is in the following order: bioattenuation < bioaugmentation < biostimulation < combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Conclusively, the present work has defined combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy requirements for kerosene oil degradation and thus opened an avenue for its remediation from contaminated soil.     

Laboratory and field scale bioremediation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils by means of bioaugmentation and biostimulation

Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils were treated for a period of up to 64 days in situ (HCH dumpsite, Lucknow) and ex situ (University of Delhi) in line with three bioremediation approaches. The first approach, biostimulation, involved addition of ammonium phosphate and molasses, while the second approach, bioaugmentation, involved addition of a microbial consortium consisting of a group of HCH-degrading sphingomonads that were isolated from HCH contaminated sites. The third approach involved a combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation. The efficiency of the consortium was investigated in laboratory scale experiments, in a pot scale study, and in a full-scale field trial. It turned out that the approach of combining biostimulation and bioaugmentation was most effective in achieving reduction in the levels of α- and β-HCH and that the application of a bacterial consortium as compared to the action of a single HCH-degrading bacterial strain was more successful. Although further degradation of β- and δ-tetrachlorocyclohexane-1,4-diol, the terminal metabolites of β- and δ-HCH, respectively, did not occur by the strains comprising the consortium, these metabolites turned out to be less toxic than the parental HCH isomers.     

A bioengineering system for in situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater

Much of the past and current focus of bioremediation has been on laboratory studies of microbial processes. By necessity, early studies have ignored important field properties, parameters, and processes that control the ultimate success of in situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater. This paper presents a bioengineering systems approach that examines the impact of some of these field variables on common bioremediation practices. Using simple systems, the niche of biostimulation is shown to be aquifers with high contaminant sorption. A novel gas-phase biostimulation filter and a novel resting-state bioaugmentation/biofilter approach which show promise for effective field implementation are discussed. Received 08 December 1995/ Accepted in revised form 30 July 1996     

Molecular characterization of microbial populations at two sites with differing reductive dechlorination abilities

This study compares three molecular techniques, including terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), RFLP analysis with clone sequencing, and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) for surveying differences in microbial communities at two contaminated field sites that exhibit dissimilar chlorinated solvent degradation activities. At the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), trichloroethene (TCE) was completely converted to ethene during biostimulation with lactate. At Seal Beach, California, perchloroethene (PCE) was degraded only to cis-dichloroethene (cDCE) during biostimulation but was degraded to ethene after bioaugmentation with a dechlorinating culture containing Dehalococcoides strains. T-RFLP analysis showed that microbial community composition differed significantly between the two sites, but was similar within each site among wells that had low or no electron donor exposure. Analysis of INEEL clone libraries by RFLP with clone sequencing revealed a complex microbial population but did not identify any Dehalococcoides strains. Q-PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Dehalococcoides strains – known for their unique capability to dechlorinate solvents completely to ethene – revealed a significant population at INEEL, but no detectable population at Seal Beach prior to bioaugmentation. Detection of Dehalococcoides by Q-PCR correlated with observed dechlorination activity and ethene production at both sites. Q-PCR showed that Dehalococcoides was present in even the pristine well at INEEL, suggesting that the difference in dechlorination ability at the two sites was due to the initial absence of this genus at Seal Beach. Of the techniques tested, Q-PCR quantification of specific dechlorinating species provided the most effective and direct prediction of community dechlorinating potential.     

Bioremediation strategies for diesel and biodiesel in oxisol from southern Brazil

Leaks and spillages during the extraction, transport and storage of petroleum and its derivatives may result in environmental contamination. Biodiesel is an alternative energy source that can contribute to a reduction in environmental pollution. The aim of the present work was to evaluate biodegradation of diesel, biodiesel, and a 20% biodiesel-diesel mixture in oxisols from southern Brazil, using two bioremediation strategies: natural attenuation and bioaugmentation/biostimulation. Fuel biodegradation was monitored over 60 days by dehydrogenase activity, CO₂ evolution and gas chromatography. The bacterial inoculum employed for bioaugmentation/biostimulation consisted of Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and PCR-DGGE using 16S RNAr primers showed that some members of this consortium survived in the soil after 60 days. The biodegradation of pure biodiesel was higher for bioaugmentation/biostimulation than for natural attenuation, suggesting that the addition of the microbial consortium, together with adjustment of the macronutrient ratio, increased biodiesel degradation. The results of dehydrogenase and respiratory activity, together with GC analysis, suggested that the presence of biodiesel may, by stimulating general microbial degradative metabolism, increase the biodegradation of petroleum diesel. The microbial community was altered by both treatments, with natural attenuation producing a lower diversity index than the amended soil. The bioaugmentation/biostimulation strategy was showed to have a high potential for cleaning up soils contaminated with diesel and biodiesel blends.     

Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation

Bioremediation of diesel oil in soil can occur by natural attenuation, or treated by biostimulation or bioaugmentation. In this study we evaluated all three technologies on the degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil. In addition, the number of diesel-degrading microorganisms present and microbial activity as indexed by the dehydrogenase assay were monitored. Soils contaminated with diesel oil in the field were collected from Long Beach, California, USA and Hong Kong, China. After 12 weeks of incubation, all three treatments showed differing effects on the degradation of light (C12-C23) and heavy (C23-C40) fractions of TPH in the soil samples. Bioaugmentation of the Long Beach soil showed the greatest degradation in the light (72.7%) and heavy (75.2%) fractions of TPH. Natural attenuation was more effective than biostimulation (addition of nutrients), most notably in the Hong Kong soil. The greatest microbial activity (dehydrogenase activity) was observed with bioaugmentation of the Long Beach soil (3.3-fold) and upon natural attenuation of the Hong Kong sample (4.0-fold). The number of diesel-degrading microorganisms and heterotrophic population was not influenced by the bioremediation treatments. Soil properties and the indigenous soil microbial population affect the degree of biodegradation; hence detailed site specific characterization studies are needed prior to deciding on the proper bioremediation method.     

Bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil: a pilot-scale landfarming evaluation

A pilot-scale landfarming investigation of the effects of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on a creosote-contaminated (258.3 g kg^–1) mispah form (FAO: lithosol) soil, with a view to developing a cost-effective bioremediation methodology for creosote-contaminated soils was conducted in nine duplicate reactors, including two controls (Treatments 1 and 2). Treatments 3–9 were watered and aerated daily and Treatment 4–9 were monthly amended with mono-ammonium phosphate. Treatment 5–9 received further amendments as follows: Treatment 5, hydrogen peroxide; Treatment 6, indigenous microbial biosupplement; Treatment 7, sewage sludge; Treatment 8, cow manure; Treatment 9, poultry manure. Residual concentrations of creosote ranged between 29 and 215 g kg^–1 after sixteen weeks. The phenolics and the 2- and 3-ringed polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were removed below detectable levels or to very low levels. The 4- and 5-ringed PAHs were removed by between 68 and 83%. Indigenous microbial biosupplement and sewage sludge were the most effective in creosote removal. Hydrogen peroxide did not significantly enhance microbial population and creosote removal. There was no significant difference between the results obtained from the treatments amended with organic manures. However, there was a significant difference between the effects of the organic manures and the indigenous microbial biosupplement. Results from this study suggests that a combination of the two treatment techniques (biostimulation and bioaugmentation) would be a better approach to treating soil contaminated with very high concentrations of creosote.     

Low temperature bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil using biostimulation and bioaugmentation with a Pseudomonas sp. from maritime Antarctica

AIMS: To identify native Antarctic bacteria capable of oil degradation at low temperatures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Oil contaminated and pristine soils from Signy Island (South Orkney Islands, Antarctica) were examined for bacteria capable of oil degradation at low temperatures. Of the 300 isolates cultured, Pseudomonas strain ST41 grew on the widest range of hydrocarbons at 4 degrees C. ST41 was used in microcosm studies of low temperature bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils. Microcosm experiments showed that at 4 degrees C the levels of oil degradation increased, relative to the controls, with (i) the addition of ST41 to the existing soil microbial population (bioaugmentation), (ii) the addition of nutrients (biostimulation) and to the greatest extent with (iii) a combination of both treatments (bioaugmentation and biostimulation). Addition of water to oil contaminated soil (hydration) also enhanced oil degradation, although less than the other treatments. Analysis of the dominant species in the microcosms after 12 weeks, using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis, showed Pseudomonas species to be the dominant soil bacteria in both bioaugmented and biostimulated microcosms. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of water and nutrients may enhance oil degradation through the biostimulation of indigenous oil-degrading microbial populations within the soil. However, bioaugmentation with Antarctic bacteria capable of efficient low temperature hydrocarbon degradation may enhance the rate of bioremediation if applied soon after the spill. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: In the future, native soil bacteria could be of use in bioremediation technologies in Antarctica.     

Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation of Anaerobic Pentachlorophenol Degradation in Contaminated Soils

The effects of bioaugmentation with a pentachlorophenol (PCP)-adapted consortium and biostimulation with glucose as a carbon source on anaerobic bioremediation of PCP-contaminated soil were investigated in terms of the initial PCP removal rate and the extent of PCP dechlorination and mineralization. Samples from two PCP-contaminated sites were prepared, put into a series of Hungate tubes, inoculated, and fed under different conditions. Chlorophenols in the tubes were monitored over a 4-month period to measure PCP transformation in the soil. In less contaminated soil (10 mg PCP/kg soil), it was found that biostimulation with glucose at 1 g/kg soil or bioaugmentation at 0.14 g volatile suspended solids (VSS)/kg soil could greatly improve PCP degradation. The best PCP degradation was obtained when both bioaugmentation and biostimulation were applied, but higher levels of glucose (2 g/kg soil) or inoculum (0.56 g VSS/kg soil) had little additional effect. The highest initial PCP-removal rate reached 8.1 μmol/kg soil-d, which is almost 20 times greater than in the unamended controls. PCP was dechlorinated to lesser chlorinated phenols with 0.6 chlorine remaining on average, and the extent of mineralization approached 70% in 4 months. In highly PCP-contaminated soil (90 mg PCP/kg soil), PCP degradation was partially inhibited, but the relative effects of augmentation, stimulation, and combined treatments were the same as in the less contaminated soil.     

Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in groundwater

An area of intense scientific and practical interest is the biogeochemical and microbial processes determining the success of natural attenuation, biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation treatments for organic contaminants in groundwater. Recent studies in this area have focused on the reductive dechlorination of chlorinated solvents, the degradation of the fuel additive methyl tert-butyl ether, and the removal of long-term hydrocarbon contamination. These studies have been facilitated by the use of stable isotope analysis to demonstrate in situ bioremediation and push-pull tests, in which isotopes are injected into aquifers and then quickly retrieved and analyzed, to measure in situ activity. Molecular tools such as quantitative PCR, the detection of mRNA expression, and numerous DNA fingerprinting methods have also proved valuable, being employed to identify and sometimes quantify environmentally important organisms or changes in communities. Methods to track bacteria and tools to characterize bacterial attachment properties have also offered insight into bacterial transport in situ.     

Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation?

Microorganisms can degrade numerous organic pollutants owing to their metabolic machinery and to their capacity to adapt to inhospitable environments. Thus, microorganisms are major players in site remediation. However, their efficiency depends on many factors, including the chemical nature and the concentration of pollutants, their availability to microorganisms, and the physicochemical characteristics of the environment. The capacity of a microbial population to degrade pollutants within an environmental matrix (e.g. soil, sediment, sludge or wastewater) can be enhanced either by stimulation of the indigenous microorganisms by addition of nutrients or electron acceptors (biostimulation) or by the introduction of specific microorganisms to the local population (bioaugmentation). Although it has been practiced in agriculture and in wastewater treatment for years, bioaugmentation is still experimental. Many factors (e.g. predation, competition or sorption) conspire against it. However, several strategies are currently being explored to make bioaugmentation a successful technology in sites that lack significant populations of biodegrading microorganisms. Under optimal local conditions, the rate of pollutant degradation might increase upon addition of an inoculant to remediate a chemical spill; however, the most successful cases of bioaugmentation occur in confined systems, such as bioreactors in which the conditions can be controlled to favour survival and prolonged activity of the exogenous microbial population.     

Kinetic Modelling and Half-Life Study on Bioremediation of Soil Co-Contaminated with Lubricating Motor Oil and Lead Using Different Bioremediation Strategies

The focus of this study was to investigate the effect of nutrient supplement (urea fertilizer) and microbial species augmentation (mixed culture of Aeromonas, Micrococcus, and Serratia sp.) on biodegradation of lubricating motor oil (LMO) and lead uptake by the autochthonous microorganism in LMO and lead-impacted soil were investigated. The potential inhibitory effects of lead on hydrocarbon utilization were investigated over a wide range of lead concentrations (25–200 mg/kg) owing to the complex co-contamination problem frequently encountered in most sites. Under aerobic conditions, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) removal was 45.3% in the natural attenuation microcosm while a maximum of 72% and 68.2% TPH removal was obtained in biostimulation and bioaugmentation microcosms, respectively. Lead addition, as lead nitrate, to soil samples reduced the number of hydrocarbon degraders in all samples by a wide range (11–52%) depending on concentration and similarly, the metabolic activities were affected as observed in mineralization of LMO (3–60%) in soils amended with various lead concentrations. Moreover, the uptake of lead by the autochthonous microorganisms in the soil reduced with increase in the initial lead concentration. First-order kinetics described the biodegradation of LMO very well. The biodegradation rate constants were 0.015, 0.033, and 0.030 day^?1 for LMO degradation in natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment microcosms, respectively. The presence of varying initial lead concentration reduced the biodegradation rate constant of LMO degradation in the biostimulation treatment microcosm. Half-life times were 46.2, 21, and 23 days for LMO degradation in natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment microcosms, respectively. The half-life time in the biostimulation treatment microcosm was increased with a range between 10.7 and 39.2 days by the presence of different initial lead concentration. The results have promising potential for effective remediation of soils co-contaminated with hydrocarbons and heavy metals.     

Autochthonous bioaugmentation and its possible application to oil spills

Bioaugmentation for oil spills is a much more promising technique than is biostimulation. However, the effectiveness of bioaugmentation is variable, because the survival and the xenobiotic-degrading ability of introduced microorganisms are highly dependent on environmental conditions. As an alternative, autochthonous bioaugmentation (ABA) is proposed to overcome these difficulties. The ABA method is like a ready-made bioaugmentation technology. In ABA, microorganisms indigenous to the contaminated site or predicted contamination site that are well-characterized and potentially capable of degrading oils are used, and these microorganisms should be enriched under conditions where bioaugmentation will be conducted. It is possible to obtain information in advance on the chemical and physical characteristics of potential oil spill sites and of oils that might be spilled. The application of ABA in the coastal areas of Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan, is considered here, because Hokkaido is located south of Sakhalin Island, Russia, where development of oil fields is in progress. If oil spills in this region were well characterized in advance, ABA could be a feasible technology in the near future.     

Bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil in South Africa by landfarming

AIMS: To determine the combined effects of biostimulation and bioaugmentation in the landfarming of a mispah form (lithosol; food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)) soil contaminated with >310000 mg kg-1 creosote with a view to developing a bioremediation technology for soils heavily contaminated with creosote. METHODS AND RESULTS: The excavated soil was mixed with 2500 kg ha-1 dolomitic lime and 2000 kg ha-1 mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) before spreading over a treatment bed of shale reinforced with clay. Sewage sludge (500 kg) was ploughed into 450 m3 of contaminated soil in the second and sixth months of treatment. A further 1000 kg ha-1 MAP was added to the soil at the end of the fifth month. Moisture was maintained at 70% field capacity. Total creosote was determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 418.1 and concentrations of selected creosote components were determined by gas chromatography/flame ionisation detection (GC/FID). Total creosote was reduced by more than 90% by the 10th month of landfarming. The rate of reduction in creosote concentration was highest after the addition of sewage sludge. The three-ring PAHs were more slowly removed than naphthalene and the phenolic compounds. The four- and five-ring PAHs, although persist until the end of treatment, were reduced by 76-87% at the end of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation during landfarming could enhance the bioremediation of soils heavily contaminated with creosote. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The study provides information on the management of a combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation during landfarming, and contributes to the knowledge and database necessary for the development of a technology for bioremediating creosote-contaminated land.     

Biodegradation of trinitrotoluene (TNT) by indigenous microorganisms from TNT-contaminated soil,and their application in TNT bioremediation

Soil and groundwater contaminated by munitions compounds is a crucial issue in environmental protection. Trinitrotoluene (TNT) is highly toxic and carcinogenic; therefore, the control and remediation of TNT contamination is a critical environmental issue. In this study, the authors characterized the indigenous microbial isolates from a TNT-contaminated site and evaluated their activity in TNT biodegradation. The bacteria Achromobacter sp. BC09 and Citrobacter sp. YC4 isolated from TNT-contaminated soil by enrichment culture with TNT as the sole carbon and nitrogen source (strain BC09) and as the sole nitrogen but not carbon source (strain YC4) were studied for their use in TNT bioremediation. The efficacy of degradation of TNT by indigenous microorganisms in contaminated soil without any modification was insufficient in the laboratory-scale pilot experiments. The addition of strains BC09 and YC4 to the contaminated soil did not significantly accelerate the degradation rate. However, the addition of an additional carbon source (e.g., 0.25% sucrose) could significantly increase the bioremediation efficiency (ca. decrease of 200 ppm for 10 days). Overall, the results suggested that biostimulation was more efficient as compared with bioaugmentation. Nevertheless, the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation using these indigenous isolates is still a feasible approach for the development of bioremediation of TNT pollution.     

Comparison of bioremediation strategies for soil impacted with petrochemical oily sludge

Different bioremediation techniques (natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation) in contaminated soils with two oily sludge concentrations (1.5% and 6.0%) in open and closed microcosms systems were assessed during 90 days. The results showed that the highest biodegradation rates were obtained in contaminated soils with 6% in closed microcosms. Addition of microbial consortium and nutrients in different concentrations demonstrated higher biodegradation rate of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) than those of the natural attenuation treatment. Soils treated in closed microcosms showed highest removal rate (84.1 ± 0.9%) when contaminated at 6% and bacterial consortium and nutrients in low amounts were added. In open microcosms, the soil contaminated at 6% using biostimulation with the highest amounts of nutrients (C:N:P of 100:10:1) presented the highest degradation rate (78.7 ± 1.3%). These results demonstrate that the application of microbial consortium and nutrients favored biodegradation of TPH present in oily sludge, indicating their potential applications for treatment of the soils impacted with this important hazardous waste.     

Bioremediation Potential of Rhodococcus pyridinivorans NT2 in Nitrotoluene-Contaminated Soils: The Effectiveness of Natural Attenuation,Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation Approaches

This work evaluated the effect of bioremediation treatments including natural attenuation, bioaugmentation, biostimulation as well as combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation on degradation of 4-nitrotoluene (4-NT), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) and 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) in soil microcosms. Bioaugmentation with a previously isolated NTs-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus pyridinivorans NT2, showed an 86–88% decrease in 4-NT, 2,4-DNT or 2,6-DNT after 60 days. Irrespective of the substrate types, least degradation (6–6.5%) was observed in abiotic control. The addition of β-cyclodextrin or rhamnolipid significantly improved NTs degradation efficiency in soil (18.5–74%) than natural attenuation (22–25%). Exogenous addition of preselected bacterial isolate NT2 along with β-cyclodextrin/rhamnolipid resulted in the greatest number (1.8× and 2.5× high) of total heterotrophic aerobic bacteria and NT degraders, respectively, compared to natural attenuation. Irrespective of the treatment types, the population of NT degraders increased steadily in the first 5 weeks of incubation followed by a plateau within the next few weeks. The treatment BABS2 (Soil + rhamnolipid + NT2) yielded highest microbial-C and -N and dehydrogenase activity, consistent with results of NTs degradation and microbial counts in combined bioaugmentation and biostimulation. Thus the results of this study suggest that bioaugmentation by R. pyridinivorans NT2 may be a promising bioremediation strategy for nitroaromatics-contaminated soils.     

Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection

Despite its long-term use in bioremediation, bioaugmentation of contaminated sites with microbial cells continues to be a source of controversy within environmental microbiology. This largely results from its notoriously unreliable performance record. In this article, we argue that the unpredictable nature of the approach comes from the initial strain selection step. Up until now, this has been dictated by the search for catabolically competent microorganisms, with little or no consideration given to other essential features that are required to be functionally active and persistent in target habitats. We describe how technical advances in molecular biology and analytical chemistry, now enable assessments of the functional diversity and spatial distribution of microbial communities to be made in situ. These advances now enable microbial populations, targeted for exploitation, to be differentiated to the cell level, an advance that is bound to improve microbial selection and exploitation. We argue that this information-based approach is already proving to be more effective than the traditional 'black-box' approach of strain selection. The future perspectives and opportunities for improving selection of effective microbial strains for bioaugmentation are also discussed.     

Change in bacterial community structure during in situ biostimulation of subsurface sediment cocontaminated with uranium and nitrate

Previous studies have demonstrated that metal-reducing microorganisms can effectively promote the precipitation and removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater. Microbial communities were stimulated in the acidic subsurface by pH neutralization and addition of an electron donor to wells. In single-well push-pull tests at a number of treated sites, nitrate, Fe(III), and uranium were extensively reduced and electron donors (glucose, ethanol) were consumed. Examination of sediment chemistry in cores sampled immediately adjacent to treated wells 3.5 months after treatment revealed that sediment pH increased substantially (by 1 to 2 pH units) while nitrate was largely depleted. A large diversity of 16S rRNA gene sequences were retrieved from subsurface sediments, including species from the alpha, beta, delta, and gamma subdivisions of the class Proteobacteria, as well as low- and high-G+C gram-positive species. Following in situ biostimulation of microbial communities within contaminated sediments, sequences related to previously cultured metal-reducing delta-Proteobacteria increased from 5% to nearly 40% of the clone libraries. Quantitative PCR revealed that Geobacter-type 16S rRNA gene sequences increased in biostimulated sediments by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude at two of the four sites tested. Evidence from the quantitative PCR analysis corroborated information obtained from 16S rRNA gene clone libraries, indicating that members of the delta-Proteobacteria subdivision, including Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans-related and Geobacter-related sequences, are important metal-reducing organisms in acidic subsurface sediments. This study provides the first cultivation-independent analysis of the change in metal-reducing microbial communities in subsurface sediments during an in situ bioremediation experiment.     

Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles,advantages, limitations and prospects

Environmental pollution has been on the rise in the past few decades owing to increased human activities on energy reservoirs, unsafe agricultural practices and rapid industrialization. Amongst the pollutants that are of environmental and public health concerns due to their toxicities are: heavy metals, nuclear wastes, pesticides, green house gases, and hydrocarbons. Remediation of polluted sites using microbial process (bioremediation) has proven effective and reliable due to its eco-friendly features. Bioremediation can either be carried out ex situ or in situ, depending on several factors, which include but not limited to cost, site characteristics, type and concentration of pollutants. Generally, ex situ techniques apparently are more expensive compared to in situ techniques as a result of additional cost attributable to excavation. However, cost of on-site installation of equipment, and inability to effectively visualize and control the subsurface of polluted sites are of major concerns when carrying out in situ bioremediation. Therefore, choosing appropriate bioremediation technique, which will effectively reduce pollutant concentrations to an innocuous state, is crucial for a successful bioremediation project. Furthermore, the two major approaches to enhance bioremediation are biostimulation and bioaugmentation provided that environmental factors, which determine the success of bioremediation, are maintained at optimal range. This review provides more insight into the two major bioremediation techniques, their principles, advantages, limitations and prospects.