Topographic examination of sister chromatid differential staining by nomarski interference microscopy and scanning electron microscopy

BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes were treated with a hot Na₂HPO₄ solution and stained with Giemsa to produce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD). The process of SCD was examined with the Nomarski differential interference microscope and the scanning electron microscope. After the Na₂HPO₄ treatment alone, unifilarly BrdU-substituted (TB) chromatids appeared somewhat more severely collapsed than the bifilarly substituted (BB) chromatids. Subsequent Giemsa staining, however, brought about pronounced piling up of the Giemsa dye on the TB-chromatids but not on the BB-ones, causing highly distinct differential Giemsa staining as well as a marked differentiation in surface topography between the sister chromatids. Removal of the Giemsa dye from the differentially Giemsa stained chromosomes resulted in a disappearance of such a pronounced topographic differentiation.     

Sister chromatid differential staining by direct staining in Na2HPO4-Giemsa solution and the mechanism involved

The direct staining of BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a Na₂HPO₄-Giemsa solution without any pretreatments resulted in a B-dark type SCD in which bifilarly substituted (BB) chromatids stained dark and unifilarly substituted (TB) chromatids stained light. Detailed examinations of the staining process suggested that the Na₂HPO₄ solution acts to collapse chromosomes whereas the Giemsa dye works to reconstruct the collapsed chromosomes, and that during the reconstruction process preferential binding of the Giemsa dye to the BB-chromatids occurs to produce the B-dark SCD. It was revealed that not only the time but the temperature at which chromosome preparations are kept prior to use considerably affect the occurrence of SCD.     

Two opposite types of sister chromatid differential staining in BUdR-substituted chromosomes using tetrasodium salt of EDTA

The direct staining of BUdR-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a 4Na-EDTA-Giemsa solution resulted in a B-dark type of sister chromatid differential staining (SCD) in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained dark. On the other hand, when BUdR-substituted chromosomes were pretreated with a 4Na-EDTA solution and then stained with Giemsa, a B-light type SCD was obtained in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained light.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids was obtained by treating chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) with Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55 degrees C (HB pretreatment) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, II, or micrococcal nuclease. In this staining pattern the BrdU bifilarly substituted chromatids were darkly and the unifilarly substituted chromatids lightly stained. This staining pattern was obtained only by staining the HB-DNase I-treated chromosomes with Giemsa and methylene blue, not by several other dyes tested. Relatively more DNA labelling was removed from the non-BrdU-substituted than the BrdU-substituted chromosomes, when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were digested with DNase I. But the protein labelling was not removed appreciably in the same treatment. The differential DNase I sensitivity between the non-BrdU-substituted and BrdU-substituted chromosomes disappeared when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were incubated with proteinase K before The DNase I digestion. Moreover, no differential DNase I sensitivity was found between the HB-pretreated isolated DNA containing and not containing BrdU. We propose that during the HB pretreatment, more DNA-protein cross-linkings are induced in BrdU bifilarly substituted than the unifilarly substituted chromatids. This structure protects the chromosomal DNA against the DNase I digestion. Thus, a reverse differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids is obtained by the HB-DNase I treatment.     

On the mechanism of differential giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids

This paper analyses the effect of acid hydrolysis on the differential Giemsa staining of 5-bromo-2deoxyuridine (BrdU) substituted chromatids in human and plant chromosomes, after treatment with a fluorochrome and light. Human lymphocytes and Allium cepa L. root tips were grown in BrdU for two or three cell cycles. Lymphocyte spreadings and meristem squashes were treated with fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, exposed to sunlight, hydrolysed with 5N HCl and stained with Giemsa. This acid hydrolysis improves the differential staining of BrdU substituted and non-substituted chromatin. It also allows the differentiation of sister chromatids with the DNA specific dye azure-A.     

Factors involved in differential giemsa-staining of sister chromatids

Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium, temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength) of UV-light influenced the differential staining. Exposure of blacklight of 10^–5 M Hoechst 33528-stained BrdU-labeled chromosome specimens mounted in McIlvaine buffer (pH 8.0) at 50° C reproducibly allowed differential staining of sister chromatids within 15 min. On the other hand, Korenberg-Freedlender's method using no Hoechst 33258 was also UV-light-dependent. Thus, photolysis of BrdU-substituted DNA was considered the basic mechanism of the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.     

Rapid irradiation procedure for obtaining permanent differential staining of sister chromatids and aspects of its underlying mechanism

Summary When fixed metaphase preparations of lymphocytes cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are subjected to a 1-min simple irradiation treatment with near-ultraviolet light (radiation dose 3×10⁵ J/m²), subsequent Giemsa staining produces differential staining of sister chromatids irrespective of previous exposure to a photosensitizer. The effects of this procedure were analyzed by irradiating single metaphases under the microscope, thus allowing precise dosage of radiation: Metaphase were subsequently stained with Giemsa and then subjected to the Feulgen-Schiff procedure. Whereas in the presence of DAPI as a photosensitizer a differential breakdown of BrdU-containing DNA in the chromatids under the influence of irradiation appeared to be the cause of sister chromatid differentiation, alterations presumably in the higher oeder structure of chromatin, not accompanied by removal of DNA, induced sister chromatid differentiation without DAPI.     

Reverse sister chromatid differential staining by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250

A sister chromatid differential staining pattern is observed if chromosomes replicate for two cycles in the presence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) and are subsequently stained in Hoechst 33258, irradiated with black light, and then stained in Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. In this pattern the chromatids containing DNA that is bifilarly substituted with BrdUrd are darkly stained and the chromatids with DNA that is unifilarly substituted are lightly stained. This staining pattern is the reverse of that found when slides are stained in Hoechst plus Giemsa. Slides stained with either Giemsa or Coomassie Blue can be destained and restained repeatedly with the other stain to alternate the pattern observed.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids after extraction with acids

Chromosomes of Chinese hamster strain cells were air-dried on slides after BrdU substitution for two or three rounds of replication. The preparations were treated with 20% PCA at 55 degrees C for 20-30 min, or 5N HCl at 55 degrees C for 15-20 min. After staining with Giemsa, unifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids stained faintly and bifilarly substituted chromatids stained darkly. Such a pattern of sister chromatid differential staining was confirmed by the examination of metaphase cells grown with BrdU for three rounds of replication.     

An investigation of the mechanism of the reciprocal differential staining of BUdR-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions.

After treatment with hot NaH₂PO₄ at pH 9, BUdR-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions are palely and intensely stained with Giemsa, respectively; however, after treatment with the same solution at pH 4, the reciprocal staining patterns are produced, i.e. these chromosome regions are intensely and palely stained, respectively. The nature of the mechanisms responsible for this reciprocal differential Giemsa staining of BUdR-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions has been investigated by Feulgen staining, electron microscopy, and radioisotope analyses involving scintillation counting and autoradiography. The results indicate that different mechanisms are responsible for the two types of staining effect. The high pH NaH₂PO₄ treatment preferentially extracts BUdR-substituted DNA into the treatment solution, relative to unsubstituted DNA. The collective evidence from this and other work suggests that BUdR-substituted DNA in the chromosomes is partially photolysed by exposure to daylight during the harvesting procedure, and the degraded DNA is subsequently solubilized and extracted during the high pH treatment. This quantitative reduction of DNA in the BUdR-substituted chromosome regions results in pale Giemsa staining of these regions. The low pH NaH₂PO₄ treatment does not produce a significant extraction of either BUdR-substituted or unsubstituted DNA into the treatment solution; rather, there may be a redistribution of the unsubstituted DNA relative to the BUdR-substituted DNA such that the unsubstituted DNA is preferentially dispersed outside the boundaries of the chromosomes onto the surrounding area of the slide. It is suggested that the BUdR-substituted chromosome regions stain relatively intensely with Giemsa after the low pH treatment because the DNA in these regions is less dispersed than that in the unsubstituted regions.     

Light and scanning electron microscopic observations on the two contrasting types of sister chromatid differential staining after ultraviolet light irradiation

Chinese hamster cells were grown with 50 M 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during the penultimate S phase to obtain chromosomes with the TB-TT chromatid constitution. Chromosome preparations made by the air-drying method were used to study the sister chromatid differential staining (SCD) resulting from ultraviolet (UV) irradiation followed by Giemsa staining by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). When chromosomes irradiated with UV light (253.7 nm, 5.2 J/m²/s) for more than 5 h were stained with 1% to 4% Giemsa in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or in distilled water, the resulting SCD invariably belonged to the B-light type in which the TB-chromatid stained lightly. SEM observations of these chromosomes suggested that the B-light SCD was due to the selective photolysis of the TB-chromatid. On the other hand, when chromosomes were irradiated for only 10 min, and stained with 1% Giemsa in PBS, they showed a B-dark type SCD in which the TB-chromatid stained darkly. However, when chromosomes irradiated for 10 min were stained with 4% Giemsa in PBS or 1% Giemsa in distilled water, the resulting SCD again belonged to the B-light type. These findings indicate that when the irradiation dose is small, the resultant SCD is not a simple reflection of selective photolysis in the TB-chromatids and the type of SCD depends not only on the concentration of Giemsa but also on the salinity of the staining solution.     

Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining

The essential steps of the 33258 Hoechst-Giemsa method for differential chromatid staining consist of (1) 33258 Hoechst treatment, (2) exposure to light, and (3) Giemsa staining. The staining was shown to be a function of the concentration of 33258 Hoechst and the light exposure. The dye was successfully replaced by various metachromatic dyes such as thionine. Two simple methods are proposed. Failure of the pale stained chromatids to restore Giemsa affinity with urea and trypsin and the diminished Feulgen reaction after light exposure suggest that not masking proteins but photolysis of the BrdU-incorporation chromatid components in the present of photosensitive dyes play a role in the differential staining.     

The role of chromosomal proteins in the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids by light

Summary Fixed chromosomes of human lymphocytes, cultured in the presence of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during two cell cycles, were exposed to near-ultraviolet irradiation, stained with Giemsa, and after destaining, were subjected to either Coomassie Blue or Feulgen-Schiff staining. A differential reaction of sister chromatids was first revealed by Coomassie Blue staining. Differential staining with Giemsa required a longer irradiation time. This appeared to be reduced after the addition of dithiodipyridine to the cells during their last few hours of culture. The differential pattern obtained after Coomassie Blue staining was the inverse of that obtained after Giemsa staining. From these findings we concluded that the induction of sister chromatid differentiation by light in BrdU-substituted DNA containing chromosomes occurs primarily via chromosomal proteins, presumably by differential breakage of their disulphide bonds. The results of the Feulgen-Schiff staining indicated that differential depurination of BrdU-containing DNA could occur, although only after very prolonged irradiation. A faint though distinctly differential Feulgen-Schiff pattern of sister chromated staining, resulting from differential removal of DNA, was observed after photosensitization by specific DNA-binding dyes. Thus, DNA seems to be affected only under more extreme conditions.     

Banding in Human Chromosomes treated with Trypsin

THE differential staining properties of the Giemsa stain were first observed by Pardue and Gall¹. They were studying in situ hybridization between mouse satellite DNA and mouse chromosomes and observed that following certain pretreatment the centromeric regions of mouse chromosomes were more densely stained by Giemsa stain than other regions. The darkly stained regions were considered to consist of constitutive heterochromatin. Similar observations were later made on human chromosomes by Arrighi and Hsu² and Gagné et al.³. Through modifications of the original methods used in the DNA hybridization work, techniques have been developed which make each chromosome identifiable^4–6.     

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids of the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids for the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse has been achieved by the combination of two differential staining techniques; one for the heterochromatic X chromosome and the other for sister chromatids. Thermal hypotonic treatment moderately destroyed the chromosome structure except for the heterochromatic X in BrdU labelled metaphase cells, resulting in the selective sister chromatid differentiation of this X with Giemsa stain. This technique enables us to know the exact frequency of the spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in the heterochromatic X without using ³H-TdR labelling for detecting the late DNA replication. The results indicate that the sister chromatid exchange frequency of the heterochromatic X chromosome is not affected by its late DNA replication during S phase, or by the genetic inactivation and the resulting heterochromatinization.     

The mechanism responsible for reciprocal BrdU-Giemsa staining

Cytological and biochemical experiments were undertaken to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the reciprocal Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions subjected to high or low pH NaH₂PO₄ treatments. These experiments included staining of chromosome preparations with ethidium bromide (EB), acridine orange (AO), or dansyl chloride, digestion of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromatin with pancreatic DNase I, and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the proteins extracted from, and those remaining in isolated, fixed, air-dried nuclei subjected to either NaH₂PO₄ treatment. The collective evidence from this and previous work clearly indicates that, although the staining reactions following the different pH treatments are reciprocal, the mechanisms of induction of the staining effects are not. After the high pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions are palely and intensely stained with Giemsa, respectively. This treatment preferentially solubilizes BrdU-substituted DNA, probably as a result of the photolysis or high temperature hydrolysis of BrdU-DNA. Concomitantly, this treatment selectively denatures the BrdU-DNA. The reduction in the amount of DNA in the BrdU regions leads to a quantitative decrease in Giemsa-dye binding, resulting in pale staining relative to unsubstituted regions. The extraction of BrdU-substituted DNA does not appear to simultaneously extract much chromosomal protein. After the low pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted regions appear intensely and palely stained with Giemsa, respectively. BrdU substitution greatly increases the binding affinity of histone H1 to DNA, and the low pH treatment preferentially extracts the less tightly bound H1 of the unsubstituted chromatin. This extraction of H1 is presumably responsible for the preferential dispersion of unsubstituted DNA outside the boundaries of the chromosome onto the surrounding area of the slide. The unsubstituted chromosome regions subsequently stain relatively palely with Giemsa, because the DNA in these regions is more dispersed than that in the BrdU-substituted regions. The low pH treatment concomitantly denatures the unsubstituted DNA.     

Normal and BrdC-substituted chromosomes during spermatogenesis with an endomeiotic chromosome reduplication in Carausius morosus Br.

Spermatogenesis involving an additional chromosome reduplication during zygotene in sporadic males and intersexes of the thelytokous phasmid Carausius morosus Br. has been examined using differential staining of chromatids after 5-bromodeoxycytidine incorporation. After reduplication autobivalents are formed by synapsis between identical sister chromosomes. Chiasmata are only formed after reduplication; they do not occur in constitutive heterochromatin, but can be formed in facultative heterochromatin, dependent on heteropycnosis and sex. Quadrivalents and U-type exchanges occur. In spermatogonia and spermatocytes the number of differentially stained chromosomes varies considerably; sister chromatid exchanges hardly appear. Sex bivalents with differentially stained chromosomes have a lower chiasma frequency than normally stained sex bivalents. Bivalents show reduced staining of all four, two outer, or one inner chromatid. Autobivalents arise in the same way as diplochromosomes; chromatids with the oldest DNA sub-units remain together during reduplication and are thus involved in sister chromosome pairing. The additional reduplication begins 7 days after the premeiotic S-phase, first metaphase after 19 days. Spermatogenesis is abnormal from first anaphase onwards.     

“Reverse” differential staining of sister chromatids

A technique for the differential staining of sister chromatids with basic fuchsin is described. The resulting staining pattern is the reverse of that obtained with a similar technique using Giemsa dye.     

DNA extraction during giemsa differentiation of chromatids singly and doubly substituted with BrdU

Human lymphocytes were cultured in ³H-labelled BrdU. Cells were pretreated to induce differentiation, autoradiographed and Giemsastained. DNA extraction was deduced if grain counts were lower in differentiated mitoses compared with untreated controls. — The differentiation method involved sequential pretreatments with short wave UV and 2 × SSC at 60 ° C. This removed 34% of label from first division cells (with TB.TB chromosomes) but relatively more (53%) from second division (TB.BB chromosomes). In second division cells, about two thirds of label was lost from pale (BB) chromatids but only one third from dark (TB) chromatids. The UV and SSC pretreatments acted in collaboration, since neither alone reduced grain counts significantly. — On testing other methods, similar preferential DNA extraction was obtained with Perry and Wolff's FPG method, and with the hot salt pretreatment of Korenberg and Freedlender. However, good Giemsa differentiation could also be obtained using Hoechst 33258 and light pretreatments without any DNA loss. Reverse differentiation patterns (TB pale, BB dark) induced by warm acids resulted in extraction of nearly two thirds of ³H-BrdU label, but relative loss was the same from pale and dark chromatin. Direct reverse staining using alkaline Giemsa did not result in any loss of label. — Thus preferential DNA loss from pale stained chromatin underlies differentiation methods using light plus hot salt pretreatments, but it is not obligatory for good differentiation using other techniques.     

Lateral asymmetry in human constitutive heterochromatin

Human lymphocytes were grown for one replication cycle in BrdU, stained with 33258 Hoechst, exposed to UV light and subsequently treated with 2 x SSC and stained with Giemsa. This technique differentially stains the constitutive heterochromatin of chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and the Y. In the heterochromatin of chromosome 9 both sister chromatids stained darkly and symmetrically but in the other four chromosomes the heterochromatin showed lateral asymmetry, one chromatid being darkly stained while its sister chromatid was as pale or paler than the rest of the chromosome. The lateral asymmetry is presumed to reflect an underlying asymmetry in distribution of thymine between the two strands of the DNA duplex in the satellite DNA component of the chromosomes. In some number 1 chromosomes compound lateral asymmetry was seen; darkly staining material was present on both sister chromatids although at any given point lateral asymmetry was maintained so that if one chromatid stained darkly the corresponding point on the sister chromatid was very pale. The pattern of compound lateral asymmetry varied among the number 1 chromosomes studied but was constant for any one homologue from one individual. This technique reveals a previously unsuspected type of polymorphism within the constitutive heterochromatin of man.