The EGF receptor and N signalling pathways act antagonistically in Drosophila mesothorax bristle patterning

An early step in the development of the large mesothoracic bristles (macrochaetae) of Drosophila is the expression of the proneural genes of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C) in small groups of cells (proneural clusters) of the wing imaginal disc. This is followed by a much increased accumulation of AS-C proneural proteins in the cell that will give rise to the sensory organ, the SMC (sensory organ mother cell). This accumulation is driven by cis-regulatory sequences, SMC-specific enhancers, that permit self-stimulation of the achaete, scute and asense proneural genes. Negative interactions among the cells of the cluster, triggered by the proneural proteins and mediated by the Notch receptor (lateral inhibition), block this accumulation in most cluster cells, thereby limiting the number of SMCs. Here we show that the proneural proteins trigger, in addition, positive interactions among cells of the cluster that are mediated by the Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the Ras/Raf pathway. These interactions, which we denominate 'lateral co-operation', are essential for macrochaetae SMC emergence. Activation of the EGFR/Ras pathway appears to promote proneural gene self-stimulation mediated by the SMC-specific enhancers. Excess EGFR signalling can overrule lateral inhibition and allow adjacent cells to become SMCs and sensory organs. Thus, the EGFR and Notch pathways act antagonistically in notum macrochaetae determination.     

Senseless, a Zn finger transcription factor, is necessary and sufficient for sensory organ development in Drosophila

The senseless (sens) gene is required for proper development of most cell types of the embryonic and adult peripheral nervous system (PNS) of Drosophila. Sens is a nuclear protein with four Zn fingers that is expressed and required in the sensory organ precursors (SOP) for proper proneural gene expression. Ectopic expression of Sens in many ectodermal cells causes induction of PNS external sensory organ formation and is able to recreate an ectopic proneural field. Hence, sens is both necessary and sufficient for PNS development. Our data indicate that proneural genes activate sens expression. Sens is then in turn required to further activate and maintain proneural gene expression. This feedback mechanism is essential for selective enhancement and maintenance of proneural gene expression in the SOPs.     

cato encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor implicated in the correct differentiation of Drosophila sense organs

In Drosophila neurogenesis, proneural genes encode bHLH proteins that are required for neural precursor selection. But many vertebrate homologues are expressed later and are postulated to have multiple roles during neurogenesis. We have isolated a new Drosophila gene, cato, which encodes a protein with a bHLH domain that is closely related to that of the proneural protein Atonal. cato expression is restricted to the developing PNS, where it is expressed in between the stages of precursor selection and terminal differentiation (and therefore later than the proneural genes). We present evidence from loss-of-function and misexpression experiments that cato is involved in sensory neurone morphology. Moreover, in prospero mutants, in which axon and dendrite outgrowth is defective, cato is strongly derepressed in the developing CNS.     

The extramacrochaetae gene provides information for sensory organ patterning.

The Drosophila adult epidermis displays a stereotyped pattern of bristles and other types of sensory organs (SOs). Its generation requires the proneural achaete (ac) and scute (sc) genes. In the imaginal wing disc, the anlage for most of the thoracic and wing epidermis, their products accumulate in groups of cells, the proneural clusters, whose distribution prefigures the adult pattern of SOs. These proteins then induce the emergence of SO mother cells (SMCs). Here, we show that the extramacrochaetae (emc) gene, an antagonist of the proneural function, is another agent that contributes to SO positioning. In the wing disc, emc is expressed in a complex and evolving pattern. SMCs appear not only within proneural clusters but also within minima of emc expression. When one of these spatial restrictions is eliminated, by ubiquitously expressing ac-sc, SMCs still emerge within minima of emc. When in addition, the other spatial restriction is reduced by decreasing emc expression, many ectopic SMCs emerge in a relatively even spaced and less constant pattern. Thus, the heterogeneous distribution of the emc product is one of the elements that define the positions where SMCs arise. emc probably refines SMC (and SO) positioning by reducing both the size of proneural clusters and the number of cells within clusters that can become SMCs.     

Control of neural precursor specification by proneural proteins in the CNS of Drosophila.

Formation of neural precursors in Drosophila is determined by proneural genes. The distinctive pattern of expression of some genes of the achaete-scute complex in the embryonic neuroectoderm has prompted the speculation that they could also function in the specification of neural precursor identity in the CNS. To test this hypothesis, we have analysed the capacity of different proneural proteins to promote the development of a particular CNS precursor, the MP2 precursor. Our results indicate that: (i) all known proneural proteins are similarly able to support the formation of a neural precursor at the position of MP2; (ii) different proneural proteins promote the expression of different characteristics of MP2; and (iii) a totally normal specification of the MP2 fate can only be attained by the proneural genes achaete or scute.     

Drosophila glial development is regulated by genes involved in the control of neuronal cell fate

The Drosophila proneural genes specify neuronal determination among cells within the ectoderm. Here we address the question of whether proneural genes also affect the specification of glia, the most abundant cell type in the nervous system. We provide evidence that the proneural gene daughterless is essential for the formation of two major classes of PNS glia. In contrast, the proneural genes in the achaete-scute complex have no detectable effect on the specification and differentiation of these PNS glia and certain CNS glia. We also show that, as with neuronal development, glial determination is restricted by the neurogenic genes neuralized, Delta, and the genes of the Enhancer of split complex. Finally, we demonstrate that prospero, a gene involved in neuronal differentiation, also affects glial development. These results demonstrate extensive overlap in the genetic control of glial and neuronal development.Abbreviations ß galactosidase - (ß-gal) Alkaline phosphatase - (AP) Central nervous system - (CNS) Peripheral nervous system - (PNS) Home domain binding sites - (HDS) Helix-loop-helix - (HLH) Peripheral glia - (PG) Exit glia - (EG) Dorsal roof glia - (DRG) Intersegmental glia - (ISG) Midline glia - (MG) chordotonal - (CH) Sensory mother cell     

Lateral inhibition and the development of the sensory bristles of the adult peripheral nervous system of Drosophila

Cells in the neurectoderm of Drosophila face a choice between neural and epidermal fates. On the notum of the adult fly, neural cells differentiate sensory bristles in a precise pattern. Evidence has accumulated that the bristle pattern arises from the spatial distribution of small groups of cells, proneural clusters, from each of which a single bristle will result. One class of genes, which includes the genes of the achaete-scute complex, is responsible for the correct positioning of the proneural clusters. The cells of a proneural cluster constitute an equivalence group, each of them having the potential to become a neural cell. Only one cell, however, will adopt the primary, dominant, neural fate. This cell is selected by means of cellular interactions between the members of the group, since if the dominant cell is removed, one of the remaining, epidermal, cells will switch fates and become neural. The dominant cell therefore prevents the other cells of the group from becoming neural by a phenomenon known as lateral inhibiton. They, then, adopt the secondary, epidermal, fate. A second class of genes, including the gene shaggy and the neurogenic genes mediate this process. There is some evidence that a proneural cluster is composed of a small number of cells, suggesting a contact-based mechanism of communication. The molecular nature of the protein products of the neurogenic genes is consistent with this idea.