Structures and Mechanisms of Viral Membrane Fusion Proteins: Multiple Variations on a Common Theme

Recent work has identified three distinct classes of viral membrane fusion proteins based on structural criteria. In addition, there are at least four distinct mechanisms by which viral fusion proteins can be triggered to undergo fusion-inducing conformational changes. Viral fusion proteins also contain different types of fusion peptides and vary in their reliance on accessory proteins. These differing features combine to yield a rich diversity of fusion proteins. Yet despite this staggering diversity, all characterized viral fusion proteins convert from a fusion-competent state (dimers or trimers, depending on the class) to a membrane-embedded homotrimeric prehairpin, and then to a trimer-of-hairpins that brings the fusion peptide, attached to the target membrane, and the transmembrane domain, attached to the viral membrane, into close proximity thereby facilitating the union of viral and target membranes. During these conformational conversions, the fusion proteins induce membranes to progress through stages of close apposition, hemifusion, and then the formation of small, and finally large, fusion pores. Clearly, highly divergent proteins have converged on the same overall strategy to mediate fusion, an essential step in the life cycle of every enveloped virus.     

Peptide models for the membrane destabilizing actions of viral fusion proteins.

The fusion of enveloped viruses to target membranes is promoted by certain viral fusion proteins. However, many other proteins and peptides stabilize bilayer membranes and inhibit membrane fusion. We have evaluated some characteristics of the interaction of peptides that are models of segments of measles and influenza fusion proteins with membranes. Our results indicate that these models of the fusogenic domains of viral fusion proteins promote conversion of model membrane bilayers to nonbilayer phases. This is opposite to the effects of peptides and proteins that inhibit viral fusion. A peptide model for the fusion segment of the HA protein of influenza increased membrane leakage as well as promoted the formation of nonbilayer phases upon acidification from pH 7-5. We analyze the gross conformational features of the peptides, and speculate on how these conformational features relate to the structures of the intact proteins and to their role in promoting membrane fusion.     

Modulation of entry of enveloped viruses by cholesterol and sphingolipids (Review)

Enveloped animal viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This crucial fusion event occurs either with the plasma membrane of the host cells at the physiological pH or with the endosomal membranes at low pH and is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the virus envelope. Both lipids and proteins play critical and co-operative roles in the fusion process. Interactions of viral proteins with their receptors direct which membranes fuse and viral fusion proteins then drive the process. These fusion proteins operate on lipid assemblies, whose physical and mechanical properties are equally important to the proper functioning of the process. Lipids contribute to the viral fusion process by virtue of their distinct chemical structure, composition and/or their preferred partitioning into specific microdomains in the plasma membrane called 'rafts'. An involvement of lipid rafts in viral entry and membrane fusion has been examined recently. However, the mechanism(s) by which lipids as dynamic raft components control viral envelope-glycoprotein-triggered fusion is not clear. This paper will review literature findings on the contribution of the two raft-associated lipids, cholesterol and sphingolipids in viral entry.     

Modulation of entry of enveloped viruses by cholesterol and sphingolipids (Review)

Enveloped animal viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This crucial fusion event occurs either with the plasma membrane of the host cells at the physiological pH or with the endosomal membranes at low pH and is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the virus envelope. Both lipids and proteins play critical and co-operative roles in the fusion process. Interactions of viral proteins with their receptors direct which membranes fuse and viral fusion proteins then drive the process. These fusion proteins operate on lipid assemblies, whose physical and mechanical properties are equally important to the proper functioning of the process. Lipids contribute to the viral fusion process by virtue of their distinct chemical structure, composition and/or their preferred partitioning into specific microdomains in the plasma membrane called 'rafts'. An involvement of lipid rafts in viral entry and membrane fusion has been examined recently. However, the mechanism(s) by which lipids as dynamic raft components control viral envelope-glycoprotein-triggered fusion is not clear. This paper will review literature findings on the contribution of the two raft-associated lipids, cholesterol and sphingolipids in viral entry.     

Membrane fusion mechanisms: the influenza hemagglutinin paradigm and its implications for intracellular fusion

The mechanism of membrane fusion induced by the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) has been extensively characterized. Fusion is triggered by low pH, which induces conformational changes in the protein, leading to insertion of a hydrophobic 'fusion peptide' into the viral membrane and the target membrane for fusion. Insertion perturbs the target membrane, and hour glass-shaped lipidic fusion intermediates, called stalks, fusing the outer monolayers of the two membranes, are formed. Stalk formation is followed by complete fusion of the two membranes. Structures similar to those formed by HA at the pH of fusion are found not only in many other viral fusion proteins, but are also formed by SNAREs, proteins involved in intracellular fusion. Substances that inhibit or promote HA-induced fusion because they affect stalk formation, also inhibit or promote intracellular fusion, cell–cell fusion and even intracellular fission similarly. Therefore, the mechanism of influenza HA-induced fusion may be a paradigm for many intracellular fusion events.     

Mechanism of fusion of Sendai virus: role of hydrophobic interactions and mobility constraints of viral membrane proteins. Effects of polyethylene glycol

The mechanism of Sendai virus fusion was investigated by studying the effect of the dehydrating agent polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the interaction of the virus with erythrocyte membranes. The initial rate of virus fusion, monitored continuously by a fluorescence membrane fusion assay, increases approximately 5-fold in the presence of small amounts (4%, w/v) of PEG. The polymer did not trigger a massive nonspecific fusion event, as the limited number of virus particles that fuse per erythrocyte ghost remains unaltered. A mass action kinetic analysis reveals that the binding rate constant increases approximately 1.5-fold; however, the fusion rate constant is enhanced by about an order of magnitude. The results demonstrate that hydrophobic interaction forces dominate the actual fusion step of the virus. Below about 22 degrees C, the viral membrane proteins appear to be clustered, as revealed by temperature-dependent fluorescence measurements of fluorescently tagged viral proteins. Clustering is not modulated by the presence of PEG, and fusion at those conditions is not observed. It is concluded that in addition to hydrophobic interactions, constraints in the mobility of the viral membrane proteins codetermine the fusogenic capacity of the virus. Such constraints have to be relieved in order to allow the occurrence of the hydrophobic interactions. PEG primarily affects the surface properties of the viral membrane, including the properties of the membrane glycoproteins. We hypothesize that during virus-target membrane interaction but prior to the actual fusion reaction, the fusion protein may undergo a conformational change, triggered by an enhancement in hydrophobic environment, which accounts for the need to establish close, i.e. fusion-susceptible intermembrane contact between virus and target membrane.     

组氨酸质子化触发病毒膜融合及其分子机制

膜融合是有包膜病毒入侵靶细胞的关键步骤,低pH、受体结合、二者兼具或其他尚未界定的机制均可触发病毒融合蛋白的构象重排,介导病毒包膜与靶细胞膜或内体膜间的融合。组氨酸(histidine,His)残基是唯一一个质子化状态变化(pKa~6~7)接近于病毒融合阈值(~pH6)的氨基酸,参与多种低pH依赖的病毒融合蛋白构象转变及膜融合,对其可能作用机制的阐述将有助于抗病毒药物的研制与发展。     

Sequential roles of receptor binding and low pH in forming prehairpin and hairpin conformations of a retroviral envelope glycoprotein

A general model has been proposed for the fusion mechanisms of class I viral fusion proteins. According to this model a metastable trimer, anchored in the viral membrane through its transmembrane domain, transits to a trimeric prehairpin intermediate, anchored at its opposite end in the target membrane through its fusion peptide. A subsequent refolding event creates a trimer of hairpins (often termed a six-helix bundle) in which the previously well-separated transmembrane domain and fusion peptide (and their attached membranes) are brought together, thereby driving membrane fusion. While there is ample biochemical and structural information on the trimer-of-hairpins conformation of class I viral fusion proteins, less is known about intermediate states between native metastable trimers and the final trimer of hairpins. In this study we analyzed conformational states of the transmembrane subunit (TM), the fusion subunit, of the Env glycoprotein of the subtype A avian sarcoma and leukosis virus (ASLV-A). By analyzing forms of EnvA TM on mildly denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate gels we identified five conformational states of EnvA TM. Following interaction of virions with a soluble form of the ASLV-A receptor at 37 degrees C, the metastable form of EnvA TM (which migrates at 37 kDa) transits to a 70-kDa and then to a 150-kDa species. Following subsequent exposure to a low pH (or an elevated temperature or the fusion promoting agent chlorpromazine), an additional set of bands at >150 kDa, and then a final band at 100 kDa, forms. Both an EnvA C-helix peptide (which inhibits virus fusion and infectivity) and the fusion-inhibitory agent lysophosphatidylcholine inhibit the formation of the >150- and 100-kDa bands. Our data are consistent with the 70- and 150-kDa bands representing precursor and fully formed prehairpin conformations of EnvA TM. Our data are also consistent with the >150-kDa bands representing higher-order oligomers of EnvA TM and with the 100-kDa band representing the fully formed six-helix bundle. In addition to resolving fusion-relevant conformational intermediates of EnvA TM, our data are compatible with a model in which the EnvA protein is activated by its receptor (at neutral pH and a temperature greater than or equal to room temperature) to form prehairpin conformations of EnvA TM, and in which subsequent exposure to a low pH is required to stabilize the final six-helix bundle, which drives a later stage of fusion.     

Virus membrane fusion

Membrane fusion of enveloped viruses with cellular membranes is mediated by viral glycoproteins (GP). Interaction of GP with cellular receptors alone or coupled to exposure to the acidic environment of endosomes induces extensive conformational changes in the fusion protein which pull two membranes into close enough proximity to trigger bilayer fusion. The refolding process provides the energy for fusion and repositions both membrane anchors, the transmembrane and the fusion peptide regions, at the same end of an elongated hairpin structure in all fusion protein structures known to date. The fusion process follows several lipidic intermediate states, which are generated by the refolding process. Although the major principles of viral fusion are understood, the structures of fusion protein intermediates and their mode of lipid bilayer interaction, the structures and functions of the membrane anchors and the number of fusion proteins required for fusion, necessitate further investigations.     

Membrane perturbation and fusion pore formation in influenza hemagglutinin-mediated membrane fusion. A new model for fusion

Low pH-induced fusion mediated by the hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza virus involves conformational changes in the protein that lead to the insertion of a "fusion peptide" domain of this protein into the target membrane and is thought to perturb the membrane, triggering fusion. By using whole virus, purified HA, or HA ectodomains, we found that shortly after insertion, pores of less than 26 A in diameter were formed in liposomal membranes. As measured by a novel assay, these pores stay open, or continue to close and open, for minutes to hours and persist after pH neutralization. With virus and purified HA, larger pores, allowing the leakage of dextrans, were seen at times well after insertion. For virus, dextran leakage was simultaneous with lipid mixing and the formation of "fusion pores," allowing the transfer of dextrans from the liposomal to the viral interior or vice versa. Pores did not form in the viral membrane in the absence of a target membrane. Based on these data, we propose a new model for fusion, in which HA initially forms a proteinaceous pore in the target, but not in the viral membrane, before a lipidic hemifusion intermediate is formed.     

Characterization of a structural intermediate of flavivirus membrane fusion

Viral membrane fusion proceeds through a sequence of steps that are driven by triggered conformational changes of viral envelope glycoproteins, so-called fusion proteins. Although high-resolution structural snapshots of viral fusion proteins in their prefusion and postfusion conformations are available, it has been difficult to define intermediate structures of the fusion pathway because of their transient nature. Flaviviruses possess a class II viral fusion protein (E) mediating fusion at acidic pH that is converted from a dimer to a trimer with a hairpin-like structure during the fusion process. Here we show for tick-borne encephalitis virus that exposure of virions to alkaline instead of acidic pH traps the particles in an intermediate conformation in which the E dimers dissociate and interact with target membranes via the fusion peptide without proceeding to the merger of the membranes. Further treatment to low pH, however, leads to fusion, suggesting that these monomers correspond to an as-yet-elusive intermediate required to convert the prefusion dimer into the postfusion trimer. Thus, the use of nonphysiological conditions allows a dissection of the flavivirus fusion process and the identification of two separate steps, in which membrane insertion of multiple copies of E monomers precedes the formation of hairpin-like trimers. This sequence of events provides important new insights for understanding the dynamic process of viral membrane fusion.     

Influenza hemagglutinin assumes a tilted conformation during membrane fusion as determined by attenuated total reflection FTIR spectroscopy.

Fusion of influenza virus with target membranes is mediated by an acid-induced conformational change of the viral fusion protein hemagglutinin (HA) involving an extensive reorganization of the alpha-helices. A 'spring-loaded' displacement over at least 100 A provides a mechanism for the insertion of the fusion peptide into the target membrane, but does not explain how the two membranes are brought into fusion contact. Here we examine, by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, the secondary structure and orientation of HA reconstituted in planar membranes. At neutral pH, the orientation of the HA trimers in planar membranes is approximately perpendicular to the membrane. However, at the pH of fusion, the HA trimers are tilted 55-70 degrees from the membrane normal in the presence or absence of bound target membranes. In the absence of target membranes, the overall secondary structure of HA at the fusion pH is similar to that at neutral pH, but approximately 50-60 additional residues become alpha-helical upon the conformational change in the presence of bound target membranes. These results are discussed in terms of a structural model for the fusion intermediate of influenza HA.     

Role of sequence and structure of the hendra fusion protein fusion Peptide in membrane fusion

Viral fusion proteins are intriguing molecular machines that undergo drastic conformational changes to facilitate virus-cell membrane fusion. During fusion a hydrophobic region of the protein, termed the fusion peptide (FP), is inserted into the target host cell membrane, with subsequent conformational changes culminating in membrane merger. Class I fusion proteins contain FPs between 20 and 30 amino acids in length that are highly conserved within viral families but not between. To examine the sequence dependence of the Hendra virus (HeV) fusion (F) protein FP, the first eight amino acids were mutated first as double, then single, alanine mutants. Mutation of highly conserved glycine residues resulted in inefficient F protein expression and processing, whereas substitution of valine residues resulted in hypofusogenic F proteins despite wild-type surface expression levels. Synthetic peptides corresponding to a portion of the HeV F FP were shown to adopt an α-helical secondary structure in dodecylphosphocholine micelles and small unilamellar vesicles using circular dichroism spectroscopy. Interestingly, peptides containing point mutations that promote lower levels of cell-cell fusion within the context of the whole F protein were less α-helical and induced less membrane disorder in model membranes. These data represent the first extensive structure-function relationship of any paramyxovirus FP and demonstrate that the HeV F FP and potentially other paramyxovirus FPs likely require an α-helical structure for efficient membrane disordering and fusion.     

The Role of histidine residues in low-pH-mediated viral membrane fusion

A central event in the invasion of a host cell by an enveloped virus is the fusion of viral and cell membranes. For many viruses, membrane fusion is driven by specific viral surface proteins that undergo large-scale conformational rearrangements, triggered by exposure to low pH in the endosome upon internalization. Here, we present evidence suggesting that in both class I (helical hairpin proteins) and class II (beta-structure-rich proteins) pH-dependent fusion proteins the protonation of specific histidine residues triggers fusion via an analogous molecular mechanism. These histidines are located in the vicinity of positively charged residues in the prefusion conformation, and they subsequently form salt bridges with negatively charged residues in the postfusion conformation. The molecular surfaces involved in the corresponding structural rearrangements leading to fusion are highly conserved and thus might provide a suitable common target for the design of antivirals, which could be active against a diverse range of pathogenic viruses.     

Functional motions of influenza virus hemagglutinin: a structure-based analytical approach.

Influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA), a homotrimeric integral membrane glycoprotein essential for viral infection, is engaged in two biological functions: recognition of target cells' receptor proteins and fusion of viral and endosomal membranes, both requiring substantial conformational flexibility from the part of the glycoprotein. The different modes of collective motions underlying the functional mobility/adaptability of the protein are determined in the present study using an extension of the Gaussian network model (GNM) to treat concerted anisotropic motions. We determine the molecular mechanisms that may underlie HA function, along with the structural regions or residues whose mutations are expected to impede function. Good agreement between theoretically predicted fluctuations of individual residues and corresponding x-ray crystallographic temperature factors is found, which lends support to the GNM elucidation of the conformational dynamics of HA by focusing upon a subset of dominant modes. The lowest frequency mode indicates a global torsion of the HA trimer about its longitudinal axis, accompanied by a substantial mobility at the viral membrane connection. This mode is proposed to constitute the dominant molecular mechanism for the translocation and aggregation of HAs, and for the opening and dilation of the fusion pore. The second and third collective modes indicate a global bending, allowing for a large lateral surface exposure, which is likely to facilitate the close association of the viral and endosomal membranes before pore opening. The analysis of kinetically hot residues, in contrast, reveals a localization of energy centered around the HA2 residue Asp112, which apparently triggers the solvent exposure of the fusion peptide.     

Role of Spike Protein Endodomains in Regulating Coronavirus Entry

Enveloped viruses enter cells by viral glycoprotein-mediated binding to host cells and subsequent fusion of virus and host cell membranes. For the coronaviruses, viral spike (S) proteins execute these cell entry functions. The S proteins are set apart from other viral and cellular membrane fusion proteins by their extensively palmitoylated membrane-associated tails. Palmitate adducts are generally required for protein-mediated fusions, but their precise roles in the process are unclear. To obtain additional insights into the S-mediated membrane fusion process, we focused on these acylated carboxyl-terminal intravirion tails. Substituting alanines for the cysteines that are subject to palmitoylation had effects on both S incorporation into virions and S-mediated membrane fusions. In specifically dissecting the effects of endodomain mutations on the fusion process, we used antiviral heptad repeat peptides that bind only to folding intermediates in the S-mediated fusion process and found that mutants lacking three palmitoylated cysteines remained in transitional folding states nearly 10 times longer than native S proteins. This slower refolding was also reflected in the paucity of postfusion six-helix bundle configurations among the mutant S proteins. Viruses with fewer palmitoylated S protein cysteines entered cells slowly and had reduced specific infectivities. These findings indicate that lipid adducts anchoring S proteins into virus membranes are necessary for the rapid, productive S protein refolding events that culminate in membrane fusions. These studies reveal a previously unappreciated role for covalently attached lipids on the endodomains of viral proteins eliciting membrane fusion reactions.     

Mechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles

Membrane fusion can occur between cells, between different intracellular compartments, between intracellular compartments and the plasma membrane and between lipid-bound structures such as viral particles and cellular membranes. In order for membranes to fuse they must first be brought together. The more highly curved a membrane is, the more fusogenic it becomes. We discuss how proteins, including SNAREs, synaptotagmins and viral fusion proteins, might mediate close membrane apposition and induction of membrane curvature to drive diverse fusion processes. We also highlight common principles that can be derived from the analysis of the role of these proteins.     

Identification of a Region in the Stalk Domain of the Nipah Virus Receptor Binding Protein That Is Critical for Fusion Activation

Paramyxoviruses, including the emerging lethal human Nipah virus (NiV) and the avian Newcastle disease virus (NDV), enter host cells through fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. For paramyxoviruses, membrane fusion is the result of the concerted action of two viral envelope glycoproteins: a receptor binding protein and a fusion protein (F). The NiV receptor binding protein (G) attaches to ephrin B2 or B3 on host cells, whereas the corresponding hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) attachment protein of NDV interacts with sialic acid moieties on target cells through two regions of its globular domain. Receptor-bound G or HN via its stalk domain triggers F to undergo the conformational changes that render it competent to mediate fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. We show that chimeric proteins containing the NDV HN receptor binding regions and the NiV G stalk domain require a specific sequence at the connection between the head and the stalk to activate NiV F for fusion. Our findings are consistent with a general mechanism of paramyxovirus fusion activation in which the stalk domain of the receptor binding protein is responsible for F activation and a specific connecting region between the receptor binding globular head and the fusion-activating stalk domain is required for transmitting the fusion signal.     

The Role of the Transmembrane and of the Intraviral Domain of Glycoproteins in Membrane Fusion of Enveloped Viruses

Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped -helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.     

Membrane fusion of enveloped viruses: Especially a matter of proteins

To infect mammalian cells, enveloped viruses have to deposit their nucleocapsids into the cytoplasm of a host cell. Membrane fusion represents a key element in this entry mechanism. The fusion activity resides in specific, virally encoded membrane glycoproteins. Some molecular properties of these fusion proteins will be briefly described. These properties will then be correlated to the ability of a virus to fuse with target membranes, and to induce cell-cell fusion. Some molecular and physical parameters affecting virus fusion—at the level of either viral or target membrane or both—and the significance of modelling virus fusion by using synthetic peptides resembling viral fusion peptides, will also be discussed.