Protonephridia and Metanephridia - their relation within the Bilateria

Two different kinds of nephridia occur within the Bilateria, protonephridia closed up by a terminal cell and metanephridia opening into the coelomic cavity. Both initially filter and subsequently modify intercellular fluids. Whereas metanephridia are strictly correlated to a coelom, proto-nephria occur in acoelomate as well as in coelomate organisms. Protonephridia of different bilaterian taxa correspond to each other in several structural features. Therefore, it is hypothesized that protonephridia are homologous organs throughout the Bilateria. They must have evolved once as one pair of monociliated organs orinatinng from the ectoderm and consistin of one terminal, one duct and one nephropore cell In the ground pattern of the Bilateria the cilium of the terminal cell has only one rootlet and is surrounded by resumably eight strengthened and elongated microvilli. Cilium and microvilli extend into the hollow cyinder of the terminal cell, which is oriented distally and is attached to the adjacent duct cell by desmosomes. This cylinder is perforated by clefts and represents the supporting structure of the filtration barrier consisting of extracellular matrix. In the Annelida and Phoronida, the metanehridia at the postlarval stages are ontogenetically preceded by protonephridia in the larva, but far reaching structural and developmental differ ences exist between the metanephridia of both. In horonids the rotonephrdial duct of the larva is retained in the postlarva and acquires a coelothelially derived funnel, whereas in annelids the metanephridia are uniform organs orihating from a solid anlage, which is a repetition of the protonehridial anlage of the larva. The differences contradict a homology of the metanephridia in Annegda and Phoronida. We therefore have to conclude that metanephridia must have evolved indeendently, at least two times. The comparative analysis of nephridia in the Bilateria allows the following hyothesis: Pro tonephridia were evolved in a monohasic acoelomate organism in the stem fineage of the Bilateria. During the evolution of biphasic life cycles consisting of an acoelomate larva and a coelomate adult, the information about the differentiation of protonephridia has been preserved in the early acoelomate developmental (larval) stages. During postlarval development and the formation of a coelom the protonephridia have either been retained or modified into meta nephridia. Accordin to the differences between the metanehridia of phoronids and annelids, we emphasize that. tiere is no possibility to trace back all bilaterian taxa with a coelom to a common stem species.     

Ultrastructure and significance of the transitory nephridia in Erpobdella octoculata (Hirudinea, Annelida)

In early developmental stages of Erpobdella octoculata two pairs of transitory nephridia occur which degenerate during the formation of the body segments. Because in the ground pattern of Annelida the first nephridia formed during ontogenesis are protonephridia, it can be assumed that the transitory nephridia of E. octoculata are homologous to the larval protonephridia (head kidneys) of Polychaeta. To test this hypothesis two cryptolarvae of E. octoculata were investigated ultrastructurally. Both pairs of transitory nephridia are serially arranged to either side of the midgut vestigium. Each organ consists of a coiled duct that opens separately to the exterior by an intraepidermal nephridiopore cell. The duct is percellular and formed by seventeen cells. Adluminal adherens and septate junctions connect all duct cells; the most proximal duct cell completely encloses the terminal end of the duct lumen. A filtration structure characteristic for protonephridia is lacking. Additionally, the entire organ lacks an inner ciliation. Morphologically and ultrastructurally the transitory nephridia of E. octoculata show far reaching congruencies with the segmental metanephridia in different species of the Hirudinea. These congruencies support the assumption that formation of transitory nephridia and definitive metanephridia in Hirudinea depends on the same genetic information. The same inherited information is assumed to cause the development of larval head kidneys and subsequently formed nephridia in different species of the Polychaeta. Thus, the presumed identical fate of a segmentally repeated nephridial anlage supports the hypothesis of a homology between the transitory nephridia in Hirudinea species and the protonephridial head kidneys in the ground pattern of the Polychaeta. We, therefore, assume that functional constraints lead to a modification of the protonephridial head kidneys in Hirudinea and explain ultrastructural differences between the transitory nephridia in Hirudinea and the protonephridia in Polychaeta. Accepted: 11 December 2000     

Ultrastructure and development of the nephridia in Anaitides mucosa (Annelida,Polychaeta)

Different developmental stages (trochophores, nectochaetae, non-mature and mature adults) of Anaitides mucosa were investigated ultrastructurally. A. mucosa has protonephridia throughout its life; during maturity a ciliated funnel is attached to these organs. The protonephridial duct cells are multiciliated, while the terminal cells are monociliated. The single cilium is surrounded by 14 microvilli which extend into the duct lumen without coming into any contact with the duct cells. Corresponding ultrastructure and development indicate that larval and adult protonephridia are identical in A. mucosa. Differences between various developmental stages can be observed only in the number of cells per protonephridium. A comparison between the funnel cells, the cells of the coelothel and the duct cells reveals that the ciliated funnel is a derivative of the duct. Due to the identical nature of the larval and postlarval protonephridia, such a funnel cannot be a secondary structure. In comparison with the mesodermally derived metanephridial funnel in phoronids it seems likely that the metanephridia of annelids and phoronids evolved convergently.     

Ultrastructure of the metanephridia of Terebratulina retusa and Crania anomala (Brachiopoda)

Adult specimens of Terebratulina retusa and Crania anomala have one pair of metanephridia. Each metanephridium is composed of a ciliated nephridial funnel (nephrostome) and an outleading nephridial canal, thus, these organs are open ducts connecting the metacoel of the animal with the outer medium. In both species, the inner side of a nephrostome is lined by a columnar monociliated epithelium which contacts the coelothel within one of the two ileoparietal bands. The coelothel contains basal filaments (in C. anomala these are definite myofilaments). The canal epithelium also consists of monociliated columnar cells which differ from the nephrostome epithelial cells in size and some cell components. Within the nephropore, the canal epithelium makes contact with the so-called inner mantle epithelium which lines the mantle cavity. The nephrostome epithelial cells and the canal epithelial cells never contain any contractile filaments. There are always continuous transitions between these different epithelia and distinct borders cannot be observed. The present results, especially in comparison to Phoronida, do not contradict the hypothesis of a coelothelially derived nephridial funnel and an ectodermal nephridial duct in Brachiopoda. But with regard to the differences between Phoronida and Brachiopoda (larval protonephridia and podocytes in the adults are unknown in Brachiopoda), further investigations have to be done to test the hypothesis of such heterogeneously assembled metanephridia.     

Structure and development of nephridia in Annelida and related taxa

Two different kinds of filtration nephridia, protonephridia and metanephridia, are described in Polychaeta. During ontogenesis protonephridia generally precede metanephridia. While the latter are segmentally arranged, protonephridia are characteristic for the larva and are the first nephridial structure formed during ontogenesis. There is strong evidence that both organs depend on the same information and that their specific structure depends on the way in which the coelom is formed and which final expansion it gains. While metanephridia are regarded to be homologous throughout the polychaetes, protonephridia seem to have evolved in several lineages. Some of the protonephridia closely resemble less differentiated stages of metanephridial development, so that protonephridial evolution can be explained by truncation of the metanephridial development. Nevertheless, structural details are large enough to allow us to expect information on the polychaete evolution if the database on polychaete nephridia increases. A comparison of the polychaete metanephridia with those of the Clitellata and Sipuncula reveals some surprising details. In Clitellata the structure of the funnel is quite uniform in microdrilid oligochaetous Clitellata and resembles that of the aeolosomatids. Like the nephridia in the polychaete taxa Sabellida and Terebellida, those of the Sipunucla possess podocytes covering the coelomic side of the duct.     

Ultrastructure of nephridial systems in cyclophyllidean cestoda: Catenotaenia pusilla (Goeze, 1782), Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) and Inermicapsifer madagascariensis (Davaine, 1870) Baer, 1956]

Electron microscopic study of nephridial systems in three cyclophyllidean cestodes indicates a resemblance in their ultrastructure. The walls of longitudinal, transverse and collecting ducts show a very similar pattern of organization. The surface of the anucleate epithelium lining the ducts is developed into microvilli. A relatively thick layer of fibrillar tissue underlies the basal membrane of the microvillar epithelium. The nucleated portions or "pericaryons", situated between the parenchymal cells, are directly connected with epithelium by cytoplasmic prolongations. The canalicular lumen extends through a single series of cells curved into a ring. The epithelial surface of the canalicular wall is developed into short, densly staining microvilli and the immediately underlying fibrillar tissue appears very compact. The cilia were never observed in any of the above ducts. The ultrastructure of protonephridia proper is comparable with those already described in other cestodes. There is a close association between the flame-cell and the cancalicular ending, enlarged into a nephridial funnel. A single row of nephridial rods of the flame-cell is surrounded by a row of digitiform prolongations of the nephridial funnel border. The prolongations alternate with the rods and their interlocking pattern appears clearly in cross-sections. A series of minute pores or "nephrostomes" providing a direct contact between the nephridial chamber and intercellular space of the paranchyma was shown. The problem of classification and definition between the "closed" protonephridia and open metanephridia is discussed. The structural unity of protonephridia in different groupes of Platyhelminthes is reviewed. The different number of flagella within the "flames" of different cestodes is compared and analyzed. The ultrastructural characteristics of duct-wall epithelium provides some confirmation of its high metabolic activity.     

The excretory organs in Sphaerodorum flavum (Phyllodocida, Sphaerodoridae): a rare case of co-occurrence of protonephridia, coelom and blood vascular system in Annelida

The excretory organs of Sphaerodorum flavum (Sphaerodoridae) were investigated by TEM and reconstructed from serial ultrathin sections. These organs are segmentally arranged paired protonephridia, which are in close association with a well-developed blood vascular system. Each protonephridium consists of a terminal part made up of two monociliary terminal cells (solenocytes), and a nephridioduct, formed by two cells. The two solenocytes lie close together. Each cilium is surrounded by 12 microvillar rods projecting from the perikaryon of each solenocyte. These rods form a weir-like structure in the coelomic space. The distal part of the weir is embedded in the proximal nephridioduct. The largest part of the cell bodies of the solenocytes, containing the nucleus, is lateral or basal to the weir-like structures. The lumen of the nephridioduct is formed by two multiciliated cells, which enclose the extracellular nephridial canal one behind the other. The canal opens through the nephropore beneath the cuticle without penetrating the cuticle. Both nephridioduct cells are surrounded by a blood vessel, which is partially folded into several layers. The significance of a simultaneous occurrence of protonephridial excretory organs and a well-developed blood vascular system as well as coelomic cavities is discussed. The results of this investigation indicate a close relationship of Sphaerodoridae to Phyllodocidae instead of to Syllidae within the Phyllodocida. Accepted: 27 November 2000     

Ultrastructure and phylogenetic significance of the head kidneys in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Thalassema</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">thalassemum</Emphasis> (Thalassematinae,Echiura)

Recent molecular analyses consistently resolve the “spoon worms” (Echiura) as a subgroup of the Annelida, but their closest relatives among annelids still remain unclear. Since the adult morphology of echiurans yields limited insight into their ancestry, we focused on characters of their larval anatomy to contribute to this discussion. Electron microscopical studies of the larval protonephridia (so-called head kidneys) of the echiuran species Thalassema thalassemum revealed distinct correspondences to character states in serpulid polychaetes, although a close relationship between Echiura and Serpulidae is not supported by any phylogenetic analysis. The larval head kidneys of T. thalassemum consist of only two cells, a terminal cell and a duct cell. The terminal cell forms a tuft of six cilia projecting into the lumen of the terminal cell. The cilia are devoid of circumciliary microvilli. A filter structure is formed by two to three layers of elongate microvilli that surround the lumen of the terminal cell in a tubular manner. A thin layer of extracellular matrix (ECM) encloses the outer microvilli of the tubular structure. The tips of the microvilli project into the lumen of the adjacent duct cell but are not directly connected to it. However, mechanic coupling is facilitated by the surrounding ECM and abundant hemidesmosomes. The distal end of the multiciliary duct cell forms the external opening of the nephridium; a specialized nephropore cell is absent. Apart from the multiciliarity of the duct cell, details of the head kidneys in T. thalassemum reveal no support for the current assumption that Echiura is closely related to Capitellida and/or Terebelliformia. Available data for other echiuran species, however, suggest that the head kidneys of T. thalassemum show a derived state within Echiura.     

Protonephridia in the larvae of the paleonemertean species Carinoma mutabilis (Carinomidae,Nemertea) and Cephalothrix (Procephalothrix) filiformis (Cephalothricidae,Nemertea)

During spiralian development, the first pair of nephridia forms anterior to the mouth. Each organ consists of a few cells, which is characteristic for spiralian larvae. In nemerteans, one of the unambiguously spiralian taxa, so far protonephridia, has been reported only in advanced pilidium larvae, where they likely persist as juvenile and adult nephridia. These organs have not been recorded in larvae of the basally branching nemertean taxa. In search for these organs, we examined the ultrastructure of pelagic planuliform larvae of the palaeonemerteans Carinoma mutabilis and Cephalothrix (Procephalothrix) filiformis. In both species, a pair of protonephridia is located at the level of the stomodaeum. Each protonephridium of C. mutabilis consists of two terminal cells, two duct cells and one nephropore cell, while that of C. filiformis consists of three terminal cells, three duct cells and one nephropore cell. In C. mutabilis and in C. filiformis, all terminal cells contribute to forming a compound filtration structure. In both species, the protonephridia seem to develop subepidermally, since in C. filiformis, the nephropore cells pierce the larval epidermis and in C. mutabilis, the nephropores are initially covered by the binucleated multiciliated trophoblast cells. On the fifth day, these cells degenerate, so that the protonephridium becomes functional. The occurrence of protonephridia in the larvae of both paleonemertean species is in accordance with the hypothesis that a common ancestor of Nemertea and Trochozoa had a larval stage with a pair of protonephridia. This does not contradict previous hypotheses on placing the Nemertea as an ingroup of the Trochozoa or Spiralia (= Lophotrochozoa). Whether these protonephridia are restricted to the larval phase or whether they are transformed into the adult protonephridia, like those of the pilidium larva, remains to be answered.     

Ultrastructure of the metanephridial system in Aeolosoma bengalense (Annelida)

Summary The excretory system of Aeolosoma bengalense has been examined by light and electron microscopy. The system consists of seven serially arranged paris of metanephridia and six pairs of podocytes (referring to the first zoid of an animal chain). The podocytes surround blood spaces of the alimentary canal forming dorsoventrally running loops that emerge on both sides of it. The two elements of the system have a correlative position, each podocyte extending in close proximity to the funnel of a metanephridium. Only in the region of the first metanephridia are podocytes lacking. The nephrostome of the metanephridia consists of two cells, an inner one, the terminal duct cell, and an outer one enwrapping it, called the mantle cell. Nephrostomal cilia that extend into the coelomic space arise exclusively from the rim of the mantle cell whereas those of the terminal duct cell arranged on its luminal surface protrude into the canal forming a flame. The nephridial canal is ciliated throughout and is either intra- or extracellular. Its initial loops aggregate to form a compact organ, the nephridial body. The middle part of the duct constitutes a loop that ascends at each side of the alimentary canal where it is in intimate contact with its blood spaces. Ultrastructural features of the duct cells suggest a reabsorptive function in two regions, the nephridial body and the uppermost part of the loop. The terminal part of the duct passes through the nephridial body and opens ventrolaterally. Generally, the transverse vascular loops at the gut consist of one podocyte each. In the oesophageal region, where only one pair of podocytes is present, the loops connect the dorsal with the ventral longitudinal vessel. Three pairs of podocytes are present in the dilated region of the intestine emerging from its lateral wall and joining the median ventral vessel or blood spaces near by. In the hind gut, where two pairs of podocytes occur, the loops arise from the dorsolateral part and enter directly the ventral vessel. Cytological features of podocytes resemble those of other animals. The results are discussed on the basis of current theories on the function and the phylogenetic significance of excretory systems in the Annelida.Abbreviations bl basal lamina - bs blood space - bv blood vessel - cf ciliary flame - ci cilia - co connection of the vascular loop with the intestinal blood space - cu cuticle - db dense body - dc duct cell - di dictyosome - za zonula adhearens - dv dorsal vessel - ecb epicuticular body - ev endocytotic vesicle - ic intestinal cell - ici inner cilia - iv intestinal vessel - lm longitudinal muscle - mc mantle cell - mg midgut - mi mitochondrion - mv microvilli - nu nucleus - oci outer cilia - oe oesophagus - pc podocyte - pe pedicel - pel primary elongation of the podocyte - sm slit membrane - tc terminal duct cell - ve vesicle with heterogeneous contents - vv ventral vessel     

Structure of the nephridium in Ophryotrocha puerilis (Polychaeta,Dorvilleidae)

Summary The nephridia of Ophryotrocha puerilis are segmental organs. The nephrostome opens at the posterior margin of a setigerous segment into the coelomic cavity of this segment. The nephridial canal is made up of about 15 cells. These cells form an S-shaped tubule which extends into the following segment. The lumen of the nephridial canal ranges from 2 to 7 m in diameter. The nephropore opens laterally on the ventral surface of the body wall.In cross sections, one, two, or three cells are seen forming the canal. The inner surfaces of the canal cells are of different appearances along the canal. Since no regular pattern of cell distribution was found along the canals of different nephridia it is assumed that changes in cell structure along the canal are due to functional states or properties rather than to anatomically fixed regional differences. The canal cells either show smooth contours or they form brush borders of microvilli or sponge-like inner surfaces with a system of vacuolar canals running through the cytoplasm. Most of the canal cells are filled with various kinds of vesicles. Usually two or three cells contain larger vesicles up to 2.5 m in diameter with more or less electron-dense contents. Some of these vesicles resemble lysosomes. There are at least three bundles of cilia in each canal. In young specimens the number of cilia in one bundle is smaller (10–15) than in adult specimens (60–70). The nephridia do not show sex specific differences. The female nephridia do not function as genital ducts. As judged from the sizes of sperm and nephridia it appears to be possible that sperm are shed via male nephridia.     

The larval nephridia of the brackish-water polychaete,Nereis diversicolor

The larval nephridia of the brackish-water polychaete Nereis diversicolor are described for the first time, and have been studied to determine if their times of development and structural characteristics are consistent with a role in the osmotic regulation of the larva. As shown in serial paraffin sections and by interference-contrast optics, the nephridia of the three-setiger larva consist of a single pair of very large metanephridia, arising in the 3rd larval setiger, but with their elongated terminal ducts and coiled ciliated tubules pushed forward into the 2nd setiger; their open metanephrostomes and anterior anchoring filaments lie dorsal to the 2nd set of setae. In contrast, the definitive or juvenile metanephridia, arising in the 4th and subsequently formed setigerous segments, have short terminal ducts and coiled ciliated tubules confined to the segments on which their external nephropores open; their nephrostomes are ventrally located and open into the rear of the next anterior segment. These findings are in contrast to the claims of Edouard Meyer (1887), who described two pairs of closed protonephridia in the 2nd and 3rd larval setigers of Perinereis cultrifera. Although it is not excluded that the single larval pair of metanephridia of N. diversicolor may arise as protonephridia, Meyer's claim of two pairs of larval protonephridia was an observational error. The larval nephridia of the marine Platynereis dumerilii resemble in form, but are considerably smaller than, those of N. diversicolor. It is concluded that the hypertrophied pair of larval metanephridia of N. diversicolor is an evolutionary adaptation to existence in habitats of low and unpredictably varying salinity. Their development occurs irrespective of the prevailing salinity; hence, it must be genetically determined.     

Origin and differentiation of nephridia in the Onychophora provide no support for the Articulata

Comparative morphology currently permits no unambiguous decision on the primary homology of the nephridia of Annelida and Arthropoda. In order to obtain additional information on this subject, ultrastructure of morphogenesis and further differentiation of nephridia was studied in the onychophoran Epiperipatus biolleyi (Peripatidae). In this species, the nephridial anlage develops by reorganization of the lateral portion of the embryonic coelomic wall that initially gives rise to a ciliated canal. All other structural components, including the sacculus, merge after the nephridial anlage has been separated from the remaining mesodermal tissue. The nephridial sacculus does not represent a ‘persisting coelomic cavity’, since it arises de novo during embryogenesis. There is no evidence for ‘nephridioblast‘ cells participating in the nephridiogenesis of Onychophora, which is in contrast to the general mode of nephridial formation in Annelida. Available data on nephridiogenesis in euarthropods (Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Crustacea, and Hexapoda) also provide no evidence for nephridia of Annelida and Arthropoda being a synapomorphy of these taxa. These findings accordingly weaken the traditional Articulata hypothesis.     

Ultrastructure of the male nephridium and its role in spermatophore formation in spionid polychaetes (Annelida)

Summary The mature male nephridia ofPolydora ligni andP. websteri (Polychaeta: Spionidae) are segmental organs composed of a ciliated nephrostome connected to a nephridial canal that crosses the intersegmental septum, expands into a large modified part extending dorsally through the coelom and subsequently narrows into a canal terminating in a dorsal nephridiopore. The nephridial canal is ciliated throughout and is composed of several cell types. Cells in the expanded region of the nephridia of both species contain large urn-shaped depressions filled with long microvilli. InP. ligni, one section of a nephridium contains cells packed with electron-dense granules that are not observed inP. websteri.The spermatophores ofPolydora ligni are composed of a central sperm mass surrounded by a layer of randomly oriented tubules that form a capsule around the sperm and taper into a long thin tail. These tubules are identical in dimensions to the microvilli present in parts of a nephridium and apparently are derived from these microvilli. The spermatophore capsule ofP. websteri is composed of similar tubules also presumed to originate from nephridial microvilli.The microvilli in nephridia of both species are surrounded with a glycocalyx that may function as an adhesive to hold the spermatophore capsule together. This glycocalyx may also function as a species specific message when encountered by a receptive female.Contribution Number 179 from Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc.     

THE FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF FILTRATION NEPHRIDIA

(1) Based on the classical studies of Goodrich, protonephridia are believed to be phylogenetic antecedents of metanephridia. It is argued here that the primary factor determining the type of nephridium expressed is body size rather than phylogenetic status. (2) The proposed model defines a nephridium functionally and predicts two general configurations for filtration nephridia in animals. (3) Application of the model to metanephridial and protonephridial systems indicates differences in the sites of ultrafiltration and mechanisms of pressure generation. (4) Metanephridial systems function by muscle-mediated filtration of vascular fluid into a coelomic space before modification by an excretory duct. (5) Protonephridial systems function by cilia-mediated filtration of extracellular fluid into the lumen of a protonephridial terminal cell before modification in an adjoining duct. (6) The model predicts a correlation between animals with blood vessels and metanephridia, and animals without blood vessels and protonephridia. The correlation is shown to be nearly perfect. (7) Exceptions to the model are discussed. (8) Original experimental evidence is given for the permeability of the protonephridial terminal cell to iron dextran and its reabsorption by the protonephridial duct in the polychaete, Glycera dibranchiata. (9) Experimental data for proto- and metanephridial systems are summarized and shown to support the proposed model. (10) The ultrastructure of the exceptional amphioxus ‘protonephridium’ is reviewed and original data are presented. Its organization is structurally and perhaps functionally intermediate between proto- and metanephridial systems. (11) An original ultrastructural comparison is made of monociliated nitration cells in a size range of larval invertebrates from five phyla. Filtration cells that are structurally intermediate between protonephridial solenocytes and metanephridial podocytes are noted in larvae intermediate in body size between the two extremes. The comparative data suggest that (i) podocytes and solenocytes are homologous cells and (ii) that body size is correlated with which of the two designs is expressed. (12) The fates of larval podocytes are followed through metamorphosis in three species. The results confirm the equivalence of podocytes and solenocytes as suggested by the comparative analysis. They further indicate that which morph is expressed is a function of body design factors discussed in the model. (13) Protonephridia are believed to be primitive to metanephridia because they occur in presumably primitive animals and in ontogenetic stages of many animals with metanephridia as adults. It is suggested here that the distribution of protonephridia is related to small body size and the lack of blood vessels, regardless of phylogenetic status. The occurrence of protonephridia in the larvae of species with metanephridia as adults is explained similarly as a function of the small larval size and lack of blood vessels.     

Ultrastructure of the preseptal part of metanephridia in Nais variabilis and Dero digitata (Annelida, Clitellata)

The composition and arrangement of cells in the preseptal region of metanephridia have been examined by ultrastructural methods in two naidid species, Nais variabilis and Dero digitata. Within this region special attention has been paid to the portion around the orifice and the region where the metanephridium penetrates the septum. In N. variabilis, the preseptal region is composed of four cells and, in D. digitata, three cells are present. In both species three cells correspond in position and ultrastructural details and, hence, are interpreted as homologous. These are the mantle cell, the flame cell, and the canal cell. The mantle cell covers the preseptal region and surrounds the opening. The margin around the orifice is endowed with cilia, which extend into the coelomic space and beat irregularly. They do not enter the orifice and, thus, are not part of the internal ciliary flame. Posteriorly, in D. digitata, the mantle cell originates from the septal wall, i.e., its extensions spread in the plane of the frontal coelothelium of the septum. In N. variabilis, the mantle cell is continued by a further cell, enwrapping the posterior region of the preseptal part. This cell, called the septal cell, is anchored in the septal wall like the mantle cell in D. digitata. Both cells are interpreted as mesodermal components of the metanephridium. The flame cell lies beneath the mantle cell. In front, on its dorsal wall, many cilia are inserted which extend posteriorly into the nephridial canal forming a flame. In D. digitata, the caudal extension of this cell was examined in more detail; it originates from an intraseptal position. The canal cell lines the anterior lumen of the nephridial duct. While the mantle cell and flame cell enclose the organ from a dorsal position, the canal cell lies opposite embracing the lumen from a ventromedial position. Behind, it extends into the postseptal region for a certain distance. It is concluded that metanephridia in the Clitellata have a coelothelial component and, probably, are not just descendants of a single cell, the nephridioblast. The results further indicate that a flame cell and a mantle cell or some corresponding coelothelial cells may be constitutive elements of the ground plan of the clitellate metanephridium. Phylogenetic consequences for non-clitellate Annelida are discussed. Accepted: 21 December 1999     

Ultrastructure of the male reproductive organs in the interstitial annelid Sphaerosyllis hermaphrodita (”Polychaeta”, Syllidae)

 The reproductive organs of the simultaneous hermaphrodite Sphaerosyllis hermaphrodita (Syllidae, Exogoninae) were examined by TEM and reconstructed from ultrathin serial sections. Oocytes are produced in the 11–13th chaetigerous segments and then attached to the outer body surface. The male organs comprise a seminal vesicle, testes, sperm ducts and copulatory chaetae. The unpaired seminal vesicle is an uncompartmented cavity above the gut and within the chaetigerous segments 8–10. Its interior is lined with a layer of gland cells that degenerate as spermatogenesis in the vesicle proceeds. The testes are situated ventrolaterally, close to the seminal vesicle in the 9th chaetigerous segment. They contain cells at early stages of spermatogenesis, which are connected to one another by zonulae collares. The testes and seminal vesicle are enclosed in epithelia. Paired sperm ducts run ventrally from about the midline of the body under the seminal vesicle and into the parapodia of the 9th chaetigerous segment. There they open, together with the protonephridia of this segment, to the outside next to the stout copulatory chaeta. Each sperm duct consists of six cells, the luminal surface of which bears microvilli but no cilia. Only in animals with fully differentiated sperm does the small opening of the proximal duct cell in each duct give access to the seminal vesicle. The mode of sperm transfer is discussed. Accepted: 9 December 1996     

Ultrastructure of protonephridia in Xenotrichula carolinensis syltensis and Chaetonotus maximus (Gastrotricha: Chaetonotida): comparative evaluation of the gastrotrich excretory organs

In an attempt to obtain detailed information on the entire protonephridial system in Gastrotricha, we have studied the protonephridial ultrastructure of two paucitubulatan species, Xenotrichula carolinensis syltensis and Chaetonotus maximus by means of complete sets of ultrathin sections. In spite of some differences in detail, the morphology of protonephridia in both examined species shows a common pattern: Both species have one pair of protonephridia that consist of a bicellular terminal organ, a voluminous, aciliar canal cell and an adjacent, aciliar nephridiopore cell. The terminal organ consists of two monociliar terminal cells each with a distal cytoplasmic lobe. These lobes interdigitate and surround cilia and microvilli of the terminal cells. Where both lobes interdigitate, a meandering cleft is formed that is covered by the filtration barrier. We here term the entire structure composite filter. The elongated, in some regions convoluted protonephridial lumen opens distally to the outside via a permanent nephridiopore. A comparison with the protonephridia of other species of the Gastrotricha allows hypothesising the following autapomorphies of the Paucitubulata: The bicellular terminal organ with a composite filter, the convoluted distal canal cell lumen and the absence of cilia, ciliary basal structures and microvilli within the canal cell. Moreover, this comparative survey could confirm important characteristics of the protonephridial system assumed for the ground pattern of Gastrotricha like, for example, the single terminal cell with one cilium surrounded by eight microvilli.     

Morphology and ultrastructure of the nephridial system of Hypania invalida (Grube, 1860) (Annelida,Polychaeta, Ampharetidae)

The excretory organs of the freshwater polychaete Hypania invalida have been examined using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Three pairs of macroscopically and ultrastructurally different nephridia are present in the thorax. Intersegmental septa in the thorax are absent, with the exception of a single diaphragm between second and third chaetiger. The first pair of nephridia is anterior to this septum, the second pair crosses the septum, with the nephrostomes anterior and the ducts and the nephridiopori posterior to it, and the third pair of nephridia is entirely posterior to the diaphragm. The first two pairs of nephridia have ciliated nephrostomes of moderate size and long nephridial ducts that extend the length of the thorax. In contrast, the third pair is characterized by short ducts and very prominent nephrostomes. Macroscopically, seven different sections of nephridial duct cells can be distinguished along the length of the first two pairs of nephridia, whereas, on an ultrastructural basis, only six different regions can be identified. Only two regions of different duct cells can be recognized in the third pair of nephridia. Cells of the two anterior pairs of nephridia show typical characteristics of transport epithelia and most likely function as excretory organs. In contrast, the duct cells of the third pair are not that much differentiated and might primarily be responsible for the release of sexual products, as sperm was observed passing through these ducts. Podocyte‐like cells were observed to accompany nephridial ducts. J. Morphol., 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.