EphB/ephrinB Signaling in Cell Adhesion and Migration

Eph receptors and their ligands, ephrins, represent the largest group of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family, and they mediate numerous developmental processes in a variety of organisms. Ephrins are membrane-bound proteins that are mainly divided into two classes: A class ephrins, which are linked to the membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linkage, and B class ephrins, which are transmembrane ligands. Based on their domain structures and affinities for ligand binding, the Eph receptors are also divided into two groups. Trans-dimerization of Eph receptors with their membrane-tethered ligands regulates cell-cell interactions and initiates bidirectional signaling pathways. These pathways are intimately involved in regulating cytoskeleton dynamics, cell migration, and alterations in cellular dynamics and shapes. The EphBs and ephrinBs are specifically localized and modified to promote higher-order clustering and initiate of bidirectional signaling. In this review, we present an in-depth overview of the structure, mechanisms, cell signaling, and functions of EphB/ephrinB in cell adhesion and migration.     

Complementary expression and repulsive signaling suggest that EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands control cell positioning in the gastric epithelium

Eph receptors and ephrin ligands are membrane-bound cell–cell communication molecules with well-defined roles in development. However, their expression and functions in the gastric epithelium are virtually unknown. We detected several EphB receptors and ephrin-Bs in the gastric corpus mucosa of the adult rodent stomach by RT-PCR amplification. Immunostaining showed complementary expression patterns, with EphB receptors preferentially expressed in the deeper regions and ephrin-Bs in the superficial regions of the gastric units. EphB1, EphB2 and EphB3 are expressed in mucous neck, chief and parietal cells, respectively. In contrast, ephrin-B1 is in pit cells and proliferating cells of the isthmus. In a mouse ulcer model, EphB2 expression was upregulated in the regenerating epithelium and expanded into the isthmus. Thus, EphB/ephrin-B signaling likely occurs preferentially in the isthmus, where receptor-ligand overlap is highest. We show that EphB signaling in primary gastric epithelial cells promotes cell retraction and repulsion at least in part through RhoA activation. Based on these findings, we propose that the EphB-positive progeny of gastric stem cells migrates from the isthmus toward the bottom of the gastric glands due to repulsive signals arising from contact with ephrin-Bs, which are preferentially expressed in the more superficial regions of the isthmus and gastric pits.     

Notch1 activation in mice causes arteriovenous malformations phenocopied by ephrinB2 and EphB4 mutants

Notch signaling is essential for embryonic vascular development in mammals and other vertebrates. Here we show that mouse embryos with conditional activation of the Notch1 gene in endothelial cells (Notch1 gain of function embryos) exhibit defects in vascular remodeling increased diameter of the dorsal aortae, and form arteriovenous malformations. Conversely, embryos with either constitutive or endothelial cell‐specific Notch1 gene deletion also have vascular defects, but exhibit decreased diameter of the dorsal aortae and form arteriovenous malformations distinctly different from the Notch1 gain of function mutants. Surprisingly, embryos homozygous for mutations of the ephrinB/EphB pathway genes Efnb2 and Ephb4 exhibit vascular defects and arteriovenous malformations that phenocopy the Notch1 gain of function mutants. These results suggest that formation of arteriovenous malformations in Notch1 gain of function mutants and ephrinB/EphB pathway loss of function mutant embryos occurs by different mechanisms. genesis 48:146–150, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

EphB receptors coordinate migration and proliferation in the intestinal stem cell niche

More than 10(10) cells are generated every day in the human intestine. Wnt proteins are key regulators of proliferation and are known endogenous mitogens for intestinal progenitor cells. The positioning of cells within the stem cell niche in the intestinal epithelium is controlled by B subclass ephrins through their interaction with EphB receptors. We report that EphB receptors, in addition to directing cell migration, regulate proliferation in the intestine. EphB signaling promotes cell-cycle reentry of progenitor cells and accounts for approximately 50% of the mitogenic activity in the adult mouse small intestine and colon. These data establish EphB receptors as key coordinators of migration and proliferation in the intestinal stem cell niche.     

Structural and biophysical characterization of the EphB4*ephrinB2 protein-protein interaction and receptor specificity

Increasing evidence implicates the interaction of the EphB4 receptor with its preferred ligand, ephrinB2, in pathological forms of angiogenesis and in tumorigenesis. To identify the molecular determinants of the unique specificity of EphB4 for ephrinB2, we determined the crystal structure of the ligand binding domain of EphB4 in complex with the extracellular domain of ephrinB2. This structural analysis suggested that one amino acid, Leu-95, plays a particularly important role in defining the structural features that confer the ligand selectivity of EphB4. Indeed, all other Eph receptors, which promiscuously bind many ephrins, have a conserved arginine at the position corresponding to Leu-95 of EphB4. We have also found that amino acid changes in the EphB4 ligand binding cavity, designed based on comparison with the crystal structure of the more promiscuous EphB2 receptor, yield EphB4 variants with altered binding affinity for ephrinB2 and an antagonistic peptide. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments with an EphB4 Leu-95 to arginine mutant confirmed the importance of this amino acid in conferring high affinity binding to both ephrinB2 and the antagonistic peptide ligand. Isothermal titration calorimetry measurements also revealed an interesting thermodynamic discrepancy between ephrinB2 binding, which is an entropically driven process, and peptide binding, which is an enthalpically driven process. These results provide critical information on the EphB4*ephrinB2 protein interfaces and their mode of interaction, which will facilitate development of small molecule compounds inhibiting the EphB4*ephrinB2 interaction as novel cancer therapeutics.     

Smad3 contributes to positioning of proliferating cells in colonic crypts by inducing EphB receptor protein expression

In prion diseases cellular prion protein (PrP^C) undergoes conformational transition into the β-sheet-rich form (PrP^Sc). PrP^C consists of the disordered N-terminal part and a C-terminal globular domain containing three α-helices (H1, H2, H3) and an antiparallel beta sheet (B1, B2). B2–H2 loop, which has a focal role in the species barrier, contains the highest density of asparagine (N) and glutamine (Q) residues in the whole sequence. Q/N-rich domains are essential for the conversion of yeast prions. We investigated the role of Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop in PrP conversion. We prepared mouse PrP mutants with increasing number of consecutive Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop. Stability of the mutants decreased with the increasing number of inserted glutamines. In vitro conversion of mutants yielded fibrils of similar morphology as the wild-type PrP. Q/N mutants accelerated fibrillization in comparison to the wild-type PrP, with mutant containing the most glutamines having the shortest lag phase. The effect of Q/N residues was specific for the B2–H2 loop and was not due to simple increase in flexibility as the introduction of Gly-Ser or Ala residues slowed the conversion despite their decreased stability. Our results thus suggest that Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop of PrP promote protein conversion and may represent a link to conversion of Q/N-rich prions.     

Smad3 contributes to positioning of proliferating cells in colonic crypts by inducing EphB receptor protein expression

Deficiency of Smad3, an intracellular mediator of TGF-β, was shown to significantly accelerate re-epithelialization of the colonic mucosa. This study was performed to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which Smad3 controls colonic epithelial cell proliferation and crypt formation. Smad3^ex8/ex8 C57BL/6 mice were used in this study and wild-type littermates served as controls. The number of proliferating cells in the isolated colonic epithelium of Smad3^−/− mice was significantly increased compared to that in wild-type littermates. Protein levels of the cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27 were significantly decreased, while that of c-Myc was increased in the isolated colonic epithelium from Smad3^−/− mice. In the colonic tissue of wild-type mice, cell proliferation was restricted to the bottom of the crypts in accordance with nuclear β-catenin staining, whereas proliferating cells were located throughout the crypts in Smad3^−/− mice in accordance with nuclear β-catenin staining, suggesting that Smad3 is essential for locating proliferating cells at the bottom of the colonic crypts. Notably, in Smad3^−/− mice, there was loss of EphB2 and EphB3 receptor protein expression, critical regulators of proliferating cell positioning, while EphB receptor protein expression was confirmed at the bottom of the colonic crypts in wild-type mice. These observations indicated that disturbance of the EphB/ephrin B system brings about mispositioning of proliferating cells in the colonic crypts of Smad3^−/− mice. In conclusion, Smad3 is essential for controlling number and positioning of proliferating cells in the colonic crypts and contributes to formation of a “proliferative zone” at the bottom of colonic crypts in the normal colon.     

Complementary expression of EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligand in the pyloric and duodenal epithelium of adult mice

Eph receptors and ephrin ligands are membrane-bound cell–cell communication molecules that regulate the spatial organisation of cells in various tissues by repulsive or adhesive signals arising from contact between EphB- and ephrin-bearing cells. However, the expression and functions of Eph receptors in the gastric epithelium and Brunner’s glands are virtually unknown. We detected several EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands in the pyloric and duodenal mucosa of the adult mouse by RT-PCR amplification. Immunostaining showed complementary expression patterns, with ephrin-B1 being preferentially expressed in the superficial part and EphB receptors in the deeper part of both epithelia. In the gastric pylorus, ephrin-B1 was expressed in pit cells and proliferating cells of the isthmus. In contrast, EphB2, EphB3, and EphB4 were expressed in pyloric glandular cells and proliferating cells of the isthmus. In the duodenum, ephrin-B1 was expressed in cells lining the ducts of Brunner’s glands as well as those covering villi and the upper portion of the crypts of Lieberkühn. In contrast, EphB2 and EphB3 were expressed in the gland segment of Brunner’s glands and the lower portion of the crypts and EphB4, in the crypts. In both mucosae, EphB2, EphB3, and EphB4 were found to be tyrosine phosphorylated, suggesting that EphB/ephrin-B signalling might occur preferentially in the isthmus, crypts, and duct-gland transition of Brunner’s glands, where the receptor and ligand expression overlaps. Based on these findings, we propose that EphB/ephrin-B signalling may regulate cell positioning within the pyloric and duodenal epithelium.     

Control of cell adhesion and compartmentalization in the intestinal epithelium

Continuous cell renewal in the intestinal mucosa occurs without disrupting the integrity of the epithelial layer. Despite the restrictions imposed by strong cell-to-cell adhesions, epithelial intestinal cells migrate constantly between tissue compartments. Alterations in cell adhesion and compartmentalization play key roles in diseases of the intestine. In particular, decreased E-cadherin-mediated adhesion during inflammatory bowel disease and loss of EphB/ephrin-B-mediated compartmentalization in colorectal cancer have recently emerged as key players of these prevalent pathologies. Here we will review our current knowledge on how cell-to-cell adhesion, migration and cell positioning are coordinated in the intestinal epithelium. We will highlight what the in vivo genetic analysis of intestinal epithelium has taught us about the complex regulation of cell adhesion and migration in homeostasis and disease.     

Homeobox gene expression in the intestinal epithelium of adult mice.

Using a polymerase chain reaction-based strategy, we have detected the expression of nine different homeobox genes in adult mouse intestine. Included among these are the recently described intestine-specific Cdx-1 gene and a new, related gene, Cdx-2. Southern blot experiments show that Cdx-2 is present in a single copy in the mouse genome. Of several adult mouse tissues assayed, intestine was the only one that contained detectable levels of Cdx-2 mRNA. Expression of all nine homeobox genes in different regions of the intestine was quantitated by RNase protection analysis, which revealed a unique expression profile for each gene. These observations suggest that homeobox gene expression may play an important role in cellular differentiation in the adult intestine.     

Paxillin mediates sensing of physical cues and regulates directional cell motility by controlling lamellipodia positioning

Physical interactions between cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) guide directional migration by spatially controlling where cells form focal adhesions (FAs), which in turn regulate the extension of motile processes. Here we show that physical control of directional migration requires the FA scaffold protein paxillin. Using single-cell sized ECM islands to constrain cell shape, we found that fibroblasts cultured on square islands preferentially activated Rac and extended lamellipodia from corner, rather than side regions after 30 min stimulation with PDGF, but that cells lacking paxillin failed to restrict Rac activity to corners and formed small lamellipodia along their entire peripheries. This spatial preference was preceded by non-spatially constrained formation of both dorsal and lateral membrane ruffles from 5-10 min. Expression of paxillin N-terminal (paxN) or C-terminal (paxC) truncation mutants produced opposite, but complementary, effects on lamellipodia formation. Surprisingly, pax-/- and paxN cells also formed more circular dorsal ruffles (CDRs) than pax+ cells, while paxC cells formed fewer CDRs and extended larger lamellipodia even in the absence of PDGF. In a two-dimensional (2D) wound assay, pax-/- cells migrated at similar speeds to controls but lost directional persistence. Directional motility was rescued by expressing full-length paxillin or the N-terminus alone, but paxN cells migrated more slowly. In contrast, pax-/- and paxN cells exhibited increased migration in a three-dimensional (3D) invasion assay, with paxN cells invading Matrigel even in the absence of PDGF. These studies indicate that paxillin integrates physical and chemical motility signals by spatially constraining where cells will form motile processes, and thereby regulates directional migration both in 2D and 3D. These findings also suggest that CDRs may correspond to invasive protrusions that drive cell migration through 3D extracellular matrices.