Evolución clínica a 5 años desde el inicio de la insulinoterapia en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 en España: resultados del estudio EDIN

ObjectivesThe primary study objective was to assess the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes and an HbA_1c value ≤ 6.5% from the start of insulin therapy to five years later in the outpatient setting in Spain.Material and methodsThis was an observational, multicenter, naturalistic study with retrospective collection of clinical data. Investigators were endocrinologists or internal medicine specialists from all over Spain. During standard clinical care, patients started insulin therapy, which was continued for at least 5 years.ResultsThe clinical records of 405 patients were reviewed. The final analysis set included records from 346 patients. At baseline (start of insulin therapy), 51.2% of patients were female; mean (SD) age was 64.6 (9.0) years; body mass index, 29.8 (4-5) kg/m²; time since diagnosis, 8.8 (6.8) years; HbA_1c, 9.4% (1.5); fasting glucose, 223.7 (55.9) mg/dL; and mean 2-hour postprandial glucose, 293.6 (71.0) mg/dL. When insulin therapy was started, < 1.0% of patients had an HbA_1c value ≤ 6.5%. At 5 years, 10.3% of patients achieved the HbA_1c goal of ≤ 6.5% (mean, 7.72%). All glucose parameters (HbA_1c, fasting glucose, and 2-hour postprandial glucose) improved at 5 years as compared to values at the start of insulin therapy.ConclusionsGlucose parameters improved over time in patients with type 2 diabetes in this naturalistic study. However, blood glucose control exceeded the internationally recommended target values. These results therefore suggest that there is still some margin for improvement in outpatient care in Spain.     

Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in Black/African American Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 6-Month,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

ObjectiveAlthough black/African American individuals are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes, there is scant clinical trial information available on antidiabetes therapies in this group. We compared linagliptin with placebo in black/African American adults who were treatment-naïve or receiving one oral antidiabetes drug.MethodsOf 226 patients randomized to 24 weeks’ linagliptin 5 mg/day or placebo, 208 had baseline and at least one on-treatment glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) measurement. Mean baseline HbA_1c was 8.6% in the linagliptin group (n = 98) and 8.68% in the placebo group (n = 110). The primary outcome was change in HbA_1c from baseline to week 24.ResultsBy week 24, mean HbA_1c changes were − 0.84% with linagliptin and − 0.25% with placebo (treatment difference, − 0.58%; P < .001), and more patients in the linagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0% (26.8% vs. 8.3%; P = .001) or an HbA_1c reduction ≥ 0.5% (54.1% vs. 30.0%; P < .001). Mean weight loss was − 1.1 kg in both groups. During the treatment period, 8 of 98 linagliptingroup patients and 17 of 110 placebo-group patients required rescue therapy (odds ratio, 0.5; P = .14). For postprandial glucose, values were available for few patients (11 placebo, 10 linagliptin), and thus the between-group difference was associated with wide confidence intervals (CIs) (difference, − 1.97 mg/dL; 95% CI, − 53.80 to 49.86; P = .94). In the overall study population, a similar proportion of patients in both groups had adverse events (58.5% vs. 61.7%); most events were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to study drug. Investigator-defined hypoglycemia was rare (3 linagliptin-group patients and 1 placebogroup patient), with no severe events (requiring external assistance).ConclusionThis study confirms that linagliptin is efficacious and well tolerated in black/African American patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20: 412-420)     

Patient-Led Versus Physician-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Multinational Atlas Study

ObjectiveSelf-adjustment of insulin dose is commonly practiced in Western patients with type 2 diabetes but is usually not performed in Asian patients. This multinational, 24-week, randomized study compared patient-led with physician-led titration of once-daily insulin glargine in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering agents.MethodsPatient-led (n = 275) or physician-led (n = 277) subjects followed the same dose-titration algorithm guided by self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG; target, 110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L]). The primary endpoint was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) at week 24 in the patient-led versus physician-led titration groups.ResultsPatient-led titration resulted in a significantly higher drop in HbA_1c value at 24 weeks when compared with physician-led titration (− 1.40% vs. − 1.25%; mean difference, − 0.15; 95% confidence interval, − 0.29 to 0.00; P = .043). Mean decrease in FBG was greatest in the patient-led group (− 2.85 mmol/L vs. − 2.48 mmol/L; P = .001). The improvements in HbA_1c and FBG were consistent across countries, with similar improvements in treatment satisfaction in both groups. Mean daily insulin dose was higher in the patient-led group (28.9 units vs. 22.2 units; P < .001). Target HbA_1c of < 7.0% without severe hypoglycemia was achieved in 40.0% and 32.9% in the patient-led and physician-led groups, respectively (P = .086). Severe hypoglycemia was not different in the 2 groups (0.7%), with an increase in nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycemia in the patient-led arm.ConclusionPatient-led insulin glargine titration achieved near-target blood glucose levels in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering drugs, demonstrating that Asian patients can self-uptitrate insulin dose effectively when guided. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:143-157)     

Effect of Glargine Insulin Delivery Method (Pen Device Versus Vial/Syringe) on Glycemic Control and Patient Preferences in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/ syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.MethodsThirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months.ResultsGroups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA_1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA_1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P < .001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA_1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA_1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P < .01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else.ConclusionPatients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA_1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:536-539)     

Relationship between glycated hemoglobin and glucose concentrations in the adult Galician population: selection of optimal glycated hemoglobin cut-off points as a diagnostic tool of diabetes mellitus

Aims/hypothesisTo analyze the relationship between glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) in the adult Galician population, evaluate the use of HbA_1c for the screening and diagnosis of diabetes, and calculate the diagnostic threshold required for this purpose.MethodsWe analyzed data on 2848 subjects (aged 18–85 years) drawn from a study undertaken in 2004 to assess the prevalence of diabetes in Galicia. For study purposes, diabetes was defined using the criteria recommended in 2002. Participants were classified into four glucose-based groups. The relationship between glucose and HbA_1c was described using linear regression models, generalized additive models and Spearman's correlation. Diagnostic capacity was assessed, and optimal HbA_1c cut-off points were calculated as a diabetes marker using the receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsPrevalence of pre-diabetes, unknown diabetes and known diabetes was 20.86, 3.37 and 4.39%, respectively. The correlations between HbA_1c and fasting glucose were higher than those obtained for HbA_1c and glycemia at 2 h of the oral glucose overload (0.344 and 0.270, respectively). Taking glucose levels as the gold standard, a greater discriminatory capacity was obtained for HbA_1c (area under de cruve: 0.839, 95% confidence intervals: 0.788–0.890). Based on the study criteria, the optimal minimum and maximum HbA_1c values were 5.9% and 6.7%, respectively.Conclusions/interpretationHbA_1c did not prove superior to glycemia for diagnosis of diabetes in the adult Galician population, and cannot therefore be used to replace the oral glucose tolerance test for screening and diagnosis purposes. Indeed, determination of glucose is essential to verify the diagnosis in the majority of cases.     

Diabetes Status and Race are Associated With Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Obese Adolescents

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate differences in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers in obese adolescents based on diabetes status and race in order to improve risk-reduction intervention strategies.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of obese adolescents, age 10 to 21 years, who were evaluated at Children’s of Alabama between 2000 and 2012. Subjects were classified by glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) as having normoglycemia, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).ResultsThere were a total of 491 African American (AA) or Caucasian American (CA) subjects. Body mass index was not different between HbA_1c and racial groups. Compared to subjects with normoglycemia or prediabetes, subjects with T2DM had higher levels of total cholesterol (TC) (178.6 ± 43.8 mg/dL vs. 161.5 ± 32.5 mg/dL vs. 162.4 ± 30.6 mg/dL; P < .0001) and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (107.4 ± 39.2 mg/dL vs. 97.0 ± 31.0 mg/dL vs. 97.5 ± 26.9 mg/dL; P = .0073). Compared with AA subjects, CA subjects had lower high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (40.4 ± 10.4 mg/dL vs. 44.3 ± 11.9 mg/dL; P = .0005) and higher non-HDL-C levels (129.6 ± 36.2 mg/dL vs. 122.5 ± 37.5 mg/dL; P = .0490). Of the characteristics studied, HbA_1c had the most significant positive association with dyslipidemia and was strongly correlated with both TC (β, 4.21; P < .0001) and non-HDL-C (β, 4.3; P < .0001).ConclusionObese adolescents with T2DM have more abnormal lipoprotein profiles than those with normoglycemia or prediabetes. Obese CA adolescents have more abnormal lipids than obese AA adolescents. HbA_1c was the characteristic most highly associated with abnormal lipoprotein profiles in our subjects. Our results show that CVD risk markers in obese adolescents vary by race and HbA_1c concentration. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:165-173)     

Effects of Colesevelam,Rosiglitazone, or Sitagliptin on Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Metformin Monotherapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glycemic effect of colesevelam, rosiglitazone, or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to examine the effects of these antidiabetes agents on lipid and lipoprotein levels.MethodsThis 16-week, open-label pilot study conducted between May 2007 and April 2008 at 20 sites in the United States, 7 sites in Mexico, and 6 sites in Colombia, enrolled adults with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 7.0%-10.0%) on a stable metformin regimen (1500-2550 mg daily for ≥ 3 months). At Week 0, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to open-label colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g daily; openlabel rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily; or open-label sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily, in addition to existing metformin therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA_1c from baseline to Week 16 with last (postbaseline) observation carried forward.ResultsIn total, 169 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups (colesevelam, n = 57; rosiglitazone, n = 56; and sitagliptin, n = 56), and 141 participants (83.4%) completed the study. Least-squares mean reductions in HbA_1c from baseline were observed in all groups at Week 16 last observation carried forward (colesevelam, -0.3% [P <.031]; rosiglitazone: -0.6% [P <.001]; sitagliptin: -0.4% [P <.009]) At study end, 10 of 56 participants (17.9%) in the colesevelam group, 19 of 54 (35.2%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 15 of 55 (27.3%) in the sitagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0%. Colesevelam significantly reduced mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels relative to baseline (11.6%), whereas levels were significantly increased with rosiglitazone and sitagliptin at Week 16 last observation carried forward (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively). Twenty-two of 52 participants (42.3%) in the colesevelam group, 12 of 51 (23.5%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 13 of 53 (24.5%) in the sitagliptin group achieved LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dL at Week 16 last observation carried forward.ConclusionAll 3 antidiabetes agents significantly improved glycemic control, but only colesevelam also significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 DM. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:53-63)     

Exenatide Therapy in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exenatide on clinical parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycemia is not adequately controlled despite treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, clinical progress of 52 obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, 5 mcg twice daily, in an outpatient setting was reviewed. Treatment initiation was between September and December 2005. Mean follow-up period was 26 weeks. Thirty-eight patients took exenatide regularly (Group A); 14 patients discontinued exenatide because of insurance, personal, or economic reasons (Group B). Measurements at baseline and at follow-up included body weight; blood pressure; and levels of hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma lipids. Insulin dosage requirements were assessed.ResultsMean body weight (± standard error of the mean) decreased by 6.46 ± 0.8 kg (P < .001) in Group A and increased by 2.4 ± 0.6 kg in Group B (P < .001). In Group A, mean HbA_1c decreased by 0.6 ± 0.21% (P = .007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P < .02). In Group A, means of the following parameters decreased: serum total cholesterol by 8.5 ± 3.3% (P = .03), triglycerides by 26 ± 7.6% (P = .01), systolic blood pressure by 9.2 ± 3.3 mm Hg (P = .02), and high-sensitivity CRP by 34 ± 14.3% (P = .05). These indices did not change in Group B.ConclusionExenatide effectively treats obese patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin, leading to weight loss and reduction in levels of HbA_lc, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-sensitivity CRP. (Endocr Pract 2007;13:444-450)     

Trace elements,oxidative stress and glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Trace elements and oxidative stress are associated with glycemic control and diabetic complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus. In this study, we analyzed the levels of serum copper, zinc, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) and urinary MDA and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in 33 type 1 diabetic patients with optimal and suboptimal glycemic control (HbA_1C < 9.0%) and 40 patients with poor glycemic control (HbA_1C ≥ 9%) and 27 age- and sex-matched non-diabetic controls to evaluate the differences between these markers in different glycemic control states. Diabetic patients, especially poor-glycemic-control subjects (HbA_1C ≥ 9%), exhibited significantly lower levels of serum zinc and increased levels of serum copper (and, therefore, increased serum copper-to-zinc ratios), serum SOD, blood MDA, and urinary MDA and 8-OHdG, relative to non-diabetic subjects. Furthermore, significant correlations existed in these patients between the serum copper, serum copper-to-zinc ratio, and urinary MDA (all p < 0.001) and the levels of urinary 8-OHdG (p = 0.007) and HbA_1C. Our results suggest that high serum copper levels and oxidative stress correlate with glycemic control. Therefore, strict glycemic control, decreased oxidative stress, and a lower copper concentration might prevent diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.     

Preadmission Glycemic Control and Changes to Diabetes Mellitus Treatment Regimen After Hospitalization

ObjectiveTo evaluate treatment patterns associated with diabetes medication regimen changes after hospitalization on the basis on preadmission hemoglobin A_1c levels.MethodsIn this retrospective database analysis, patients with a diabetes diagnosis, hospitalization, and documented hemoglobin A_1c level within the 90 days leading up to hospital admission were identified in an administrative claims database. Treatment regimens were assessed before and after hospitalization. The proportion of patients who had progression, reduction, or no change in therapy was compared across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups: hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0%, hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9%, and hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0%.ResultsFour hundred patients were included (192 in hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% group, 94 in hemoglobin A_1c 7.0% 7.9% group, and 114 in hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% group). Demographically, hemoglobin A_1c subgroups did not differ significantly (mean age, 57 years; 47.5% male). With respect to therapeutic regimen overall, 28%, 24%, and 48% of patients experienced progression, reduction, and no change, respectively. Across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups, 37.7% of patients in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup had therapy progression compared with 26% and 20.2% in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% and hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroups, respectively (P = .032 and P = .006, respectively). Within the progression category, progression via insulin initiation was significantly higher in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup (55.8%) than in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (16%, P < .001), but not significantly higher than in the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (36.8%, P = .084). In the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup, a lower percentage of patients, 35.1%, experienced no therapy change than in both the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (52.6%) and the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (54.3%) (P = .003 and P = .006, respectively). There was no difference between subgroups in reduction of therapy.ConclusionsA higher proportion of patients with a hemoglobin A_1c level ≥ 8.0% had progression of their antidiabetes therapy after hospitalization and fewer patients had no change in therapy than those in lower hemoglobin A_1c subgroups. These data suggest that clinicians may be using hemoglobin A_1c measurements to guide discharge planning treatment decisions. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:371-375)     

Reduced Risk of Hypoglycemia with Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Requiring High Doses of Basal Insulin: A Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Begin Trials

ObjectiveThis meta-analysis of 5 trials from the Phase 3a insulin degludec (IDeg) clinical trial program evaluated the risk of hypoglycemia in a subset of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who required high basal insulin doses at the end of the trials.MethodsThis meta-analysis compared glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), basal insulin dose, body weight, and rates of overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia in a pooled population of T2D subjects using > 60 U basal insulin at trial completion. Five Phase 3a, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target, confirmatory 26-or 52-week trials with IDeg (n = 2,262) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) (n = 1,110) administered once daily were included. Overall confirmed hypoglycemia was defined as self-measured blood glucose < 56 mg/dL or any episode requiring assistance; nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia had an onset between 00:01 and 05:59 am.ResultsMore than one-third of IDeg-(35%) and IGlar-(34%) treated T2D subjects required > 60 U of basal insulin daily at the ends of the trial. Patients achieved similar mean HbA_1c values (estimated treatment difference [ETD] IDeg - IGlar: 0.05%, P = .44) while mean FPG values were lower with IDeg than IGlar (ETD: - 5.9 mg/ dL, P = .04) at end-of-trial. There was a 21% lower rate of overall confirmed hypoglycemic episodes for IDeg (estimated rate ratio [RR] IDeg/IGlar: 0.79, P = .02) and a 52% lower rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemic episodes for IDeg (RR: 0.48, P < .01).ConclusionIn this post hoc meta-analysis, more than 30% of subjects with T2D required > 60 U/day of basal insulin at the end of the trials. In these individuals, IDeg achieves similar HbA_1c reduction with significantly less overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia compared with IGlar. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:285-292)     

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Lispro in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin lispro in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (obese) compared with patients with BMIs < 30 kg/m² (nonobese).MethodsA retrospective analysis of predefined endpoints from 7 randomized clinical trials of T2DM patients treated with insulin lispro was performed. The primary efficacy measure was to assess the noninferiority of insulin lispro in obese patients versus nonobese patients as measured by the change in hemoglobin A1C (HbA_1c) from baseline to Month 3 (n = 1,518), using a noninferiority margin of 0.4%. The secondary measures included overall hypoglycemia incidence and event rates and relative change in body weight.ResultsMean changes in HbA_1c from baseline (9.06% for obese and 8.92% for nonobese) to Month 3 were similar for obese patients (–1.03%) and nonobese (–1.02%), with a least squares (LS) mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of –0.05% (–0.17%, 0.07%; P = .384). The overall incidence of hypoglycemia (53% vs. 63%; P < .001) and rate of hypoglycemia (0.93 vs. 1.76 events per 30 days; P < .001) was significantly lower in obese patients compared with nonobese patients. The 2 BMI cohorts did not demonstrate a significant difference in mean percent changes in body weights (LS mean difference = 0.4% [–0.2%, 0.9%]; P = .202).ConclusionObese patients with T2DM treated with insulin lispro were able to achieve the same level of glycemic control as their nonobese counterparts, with some evidence supporting a reduced risk of hypoglycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:389-398)     

Falsely Decreased Hba1c in A Type 2 Diabetic Patient Treated with Dapsone

ObjectiveTo discuss a case of a falsely low hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) in a transplant patient treated with dapsone and its implications. HbA_1c is widely used as a measure of glycemic control in diabetic patients. With the increasing transplant population, it is important to be mindful of medications used in this population that can affect HbA_1c and to use other measures of glycemic control to guide treatment decisions.MethodsWe present details of the case and review the relevant literature.ResultsA 61-year-old patient received a liver transplant in 2012 and subsequently was noted to have a falling HbA_1c despite evidence of hyperglycemia based on fingerstick glucose and fructosamine measurements. Review of the medical records revealed that the discordance between HbA_1c and fingerstick glucose levels developed after initiation of dapsone therapy. Dapsone may lead to a falsely low HbA_1c via several mechanisms. Upon cessation of dapsone therapy, the patient’s HbA_1c returned to pre-dapsone levels.ConclusionIt is important to be aware of medications commonly used in transplant patients that may lead to a falsely low HbA_1c level so that incorrect treatment decisions are not made. Fructosamine correlates with HbA_1c and can be used as a measure of glycemic control in transplant patients when HbA_1c cannot be used. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:e229-e232)     

Vitamin D insufficiency in diabetic retinopathy

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between vitamin D status and diabetic retinopathy.MethodsA clinic-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Overall, 221 patients were classified into 5 groups based on diabetes status and retinopathy findings: no diabetes or ocular disease (n = 47), no diabetes with ocular disease (n = 51), diabetes with no background diabetic retinopathy (n = 41), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 40), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (n = 42). Patients with type 1 diabetes and those taking > 1,000 IU of vitamin D daily were excluded from the analyses. Study subjects underwent dilated funduscopic examination and were tested for hemoglobin A_1c, serum creatinine, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels between December 2009 and March 2010.ResultsAmong the study groups, there was no statistically significant difference in age, race, sex, or multivitamin use. Patients with diabetes had lower 25(OH)D levels than did those without diabetes (22.9 ng/mL versus 30.3 ng/mL, respectively; P < .001). The mean 25(OH)D levels, stratified by group, were as follows: no diabetes or ocular disease = 31.9 ng/mL; no diabetes with ocular disease = 28.8 ng/mL; no background diabetic retinopathy = 24.3 ng/ mL; nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy = 23.6 ng/mL; and PDR = 21.1 ng/mL. Univariate analysis of the 25(OH) D levels demonstrated statistically significant differences on the basis of study groups, race, body mass index, multivitamin use, hemoglobin A_1c, serum creatinine level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. In a multivariate linear regression model with all potential confounders, only multivitamin use remained significant (P < .001).ConclusionThis study suggests that patients with diabetes, especially those with PDR, have lower 25(OH)D levels than those without diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2012; 18:185-193)     

Sitagliptin Compared with Thiazolidinediones as a Third-Line Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare sitagliptin and thiazolidinediones as third-line oral antihyperglycemic agents among ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn an open-label, single-arm design, we treated type 2 diabetic patients who had suboptimal diabetes control on maximum tolerated dosages of metformin plus sulfonylureas with the addition of sitagliptin, 100 mg daily, and compared their responses with findings from a historical control group of similar patients treated with rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily, or pioglitazone, 45 mg daily, as their third-line oral agent. Patients were assessed bimonthly, and those who achieved hemoglobin A_1c levels less than 7.5% at 4 months continued through 1 year of follow-up.Results:One hundred eight patients were treated with sitagliptin, and 104 patients constituted the historical control group treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. At baseline, sitagliptinand thiazolidinedione-treated patients had identical hemoglobin A_1c levels (mean ± SD) (9.4 ± 1.8% and 9.4 ± 1.9%, respectively) and similar known diabetes duration (6.7 ± 5.0 years and 7.6 ± 5.8 years, respectively). Hemoglobin A_1c was reduced in both groups at 4 months (P < .001), but the reduction was greater with thiazolidinediones than with sitagliptin (-2.0 ± 1.7% vs -1.3 ± 1.8%; P = .006), as was the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% (62% vs 46%; P = .026). Of all patients achieving a hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% at 4 months, the same proportions in each group sustained their hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% by 12 months (59% vs 58%). Sitagliptin was well tolerated.ConclusionsAmong ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes while taking maximum tolerated dosages of metformin and sulfonylureas, thirdline add-on therapy with a thiazolidinedione controlled hyperglycemia more effectively than sitagliptin after 4 months. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:691-698)     

Effect of Hospital Admission on Glycemic Control 1 Year After Discharge

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of hospital admission on glycemic control in patients with diabetes up to 1 year after discharge.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 826 adults with diabetes admitted to a tertiary care medical center and with available hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) values for 6 months before admission and 1 year after discharge. We compared them with 826 nonhospitalized adults with diabetes matched for age, sex, race, comorbidity, and baseline A1C level. We determined the change in A1C value relative to hospitalization and baseline A1C level by using multivariate random effects models for repeated measures. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of achieving recommended A1C levels at 1 year.ResultsPatients with baseline A1C levels ≥ 9% had an adjusted rate of change in A1C value of − 0.10% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.18 to − 0.022; P = .012) during the course of 1 year, without significant differences between hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients in the mean rate of change. Hospitalized patients, however, were less likely to achieve an A1C goal of ≤ 7% at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.86; P < .001) or an A1C of < 8% at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.81; P < .001) in comparison with the nonhospitalized patients.ConclusionDespite an overall trend toward improved glycemia over time, hospitalized patients with uncontrolled diabetes were less likely to achieve glycemic targets at 1 year in comparison with matched nonhospitalized patients. These results suggest a missed opportunity to improve long-term glycemic control in hospitalized patients with diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:456-463)     

Podocyte as A Potential Target of Inflammation: Role of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo observe the effects of pioglitazone hydrochloride on urinary sediment podocalyxin and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and to explore its possible renoprotective mechanisms.MethodsNinety-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, who were previously prescribed metformin, acarbose, or both, were randomly assigned to a DP group (add-on pioglitazone; n = 49) or a DS group (add-on sulfonylurea; n = 49).ResultsAfter 12 weeks of treatment, both add-on pioglitazone therapy (the DP group) and add-on sulfonylurea therapy (the DS group) demonstrated a similar improvement in fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A_1c, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined significantly in only the DP group. Moreover, the DP group showed significantly better efficacy in reducing urinary MCP-1 excretion in comparison with the DS group. Furthermore, both urinary albumin and urinary sediment podocalyxin excretion decreased significantly in the DP group but not in the DS group. The urinary sediment podocalyxin to creatinine ratio had a positive correlation with urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (r = 0.624; P < .01) and urinary MCP-1 to creatinine ratio (r = 0.346; P < .01).ConclusionPioglitazone treatment revealed a podocyte-protective capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the underlying mechanisms may be partly attributed to its effective suppression of excessive local renal inflammation. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:493-498)     

A Comparison of Twice-Daily Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 and Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin and Oral Therapy: A Randomized,Open-Label Study

ObjectiveTo compare efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) with insulin (glargine) in type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs.MethodsIn a 24-week, open-label, parallel-group trial, type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin (glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn) + oral antidiabetic drugs were randomly assigned to twice-daily BIAsp 30 + metformin or oncedaily glargine + metformin + secretagogues (secretagogues were discontinued in the BIAsp 30 arm).ResultsOne hundred thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to the BIAsp 30 group and 143 patients were randomly assigned to the glargine group. Of 280 patients randomized, 229 (81.8%) completed the study. End-of-trial hemoglobin A_1c reductions were − 1.3% (BIAsp 30) vs − 1.2% (glargine) (treatment difference: 95% confidence interval, − 0.06 [− 0.32 to 0.20]; P = .657). Of patients taking BIAsp 30, 27.3% reached a hemoglobin A_1c level < 7.0% compared with 22.0% of patients taking glargine (treatment difference: P = .388). Glucose increment averaged over 3 meals was lower in the BIAsp 30 arm (treatment difference: − 17.8 mg/dL, P = .001). Fasting plasma glucose reductions from baseline were − 13.8 mg/ dL (BIAsp 30) vs − 42.5 mg/dL (glargine) (P = .0002). Final minor hypoglycemia rate, insulin dose, and weight change were higher in the BIAsp 30 arm (6.5 vs 3.4 events/patient per year, P <.05; 1.19 vs 0.63 U/kg; and 3.1 vs 1.4 kg, P = .0004, respectively).ConclusionsDespite not receiving secretagogues, patients taking BIAsp 30 + metformin achieved similar hemoglobin A_1c levels and lower postprandial plasma glucose compared with those receiving glargine + metformin + secretagogues. The large improvement in the glargine group suggests the patients were not true basal failures at randomization. While switching to BIAsp 30 improves glycemic control in this patient population, remaining on basal insulin and optimizing the dose may be equally effective in the short term. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:41-50)     

Hemoglobin A1C,Mean Glucose,and Persistence of Glycation Ratios in Insulin-Treated Diabetes

ObjectiveDetermine the relationship between mean glucose (MG), as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) in insulin-requiring adults in a clinical practice setting and examine the persistence of this relationship over time.MethodsIn this retrospective record review in a diabetes practice, a linear regression model was developed using data sets from all patients with ≥ 1 available download of a Dexcom SevenPlus CGM device in which there was > 50% utilization in the 60 days prior to a laboratory A1C. Persistence of the MG to A1C relationship was examined in patients with ≥ 2 data sets available.ResultsA total of 139 patients had ≥ 1 data set available for evaluation, and 101 patients had ≥ 2 data sets (range, 2 to 6; total, 279). The slope of the MG versus A1C curve was 19.5 mg/dL for each 1% change in A1C, with an intercept of 17.7 mg/dL. Although 88% of the measured MG values were within 15% of the A1C-predicted MG, there was substantial variation in individuals, with differences as large as ± 26%. The MG to A1C (MG:A1C) ratio, which is a measure of glycation, was normally distributed, with a median of 21.6. Spearman correlation coefficients for the MG:A1C ratio on repeated measures ranged from 0.52 to 0.73, demonstrating persistence.ConclusionThe relationship between MG and A1C is linear in a population but can vary between individuals. The MG:A1C ratio was normally distributed, tended to persist in individuals over time, and thus could be useful to identify apparent high and low glycators. Glycemic goals may need to be modified in such patients. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:252-260)     

Effects of human chorionic gonadotropin combined with clomiphene on Serum E2, FSH,LH and PRL levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome

ObjectiveEffects of human chorionic gonadotropin combined with clomiphene on serum E₂, FSH, LH and PRL levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome were analyzed.Methods90 patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome treated from January 2015 to March 2016 were randomly and evenly divided into control group and observation group. Patients in the control group were only treated with clomiphene. On the basis of the treatment in control group, human chorionic gonadotropin was added in the treatment of observation group. The changes of E₂, FSH, LH, PRL levels were compared between two groups before and after the treatment. Clinical curative effects of patients in the two groups was evaluated. Adverse reactions during treatment in two groups were observed and recorded. The incidence of adverse reactions was calculated.ResultsSerum E₂, FSH, LH and PRL levels in the two groups decreased significantly after treatment compared with that before treatment. The difference is statistical significant (P < 0.05). After the treatment, E₂, FSH, LH and PRL levels in the observation group were lower than that in the control group and the difference is statistical significant (P < 0.05). Total effective rate was 64.44% in the control group and 93.33% in the observation group. There were statistically significant difference in clinical curative effects in the two groups (P < 0.05). Different degrees of adverse reactions were found in both groups during treatment, such as nausea, vomiting, anorexia, liver dysfunction. There were 2 cases of nausea, 2 cases of vomiting, 3 cases of anorexia and 1 case of liver dysfunction from the 45 patients in control group. The total incidence of adverse reactions was 17.78% (8/45). There were 1 case of nausea, 1 case of vomiting, 1 case of anorexia and no liver dysfunction from the 45 patients in observation group. The total incidence of adverse reactions was 6.67% (3/45). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).ConclusionCombined use of human chorionic gonadotropin can significantly reduce serum E₂, FSH, LH and PRL levels, improve clinical curative effects and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. Human chorionic gonadotropin has high application value on the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome.