An outpatient-based clinical program for diabetes prevention: an update

ObjectiveTo update outcomes of the Diet-ExerciseActivity-Lifestyle (DEAL) program, a clinic-based diabetes prevention intervention.MethodsChanges in weight, fasting blood glucose, and 2-hour glucose after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were evaluated in patients who enrolled in the DEAL program between January 2007 and August 2009.ResultsThe 221 qualified participants had a mean age of 62 years, weight of 87.4 kg, body mass index of 31.2 kg/m², fasting glucose level of 109 mg/dL, and 2-hour glucose value of 138 mg/dL. Among the program participants, 67% were women and 88% were white; 56% had isolated impaired fasting glucose, 5% had impaired glucose tolerance only, and 39% had both. The 6-month follow-up medical appointment was kept by 72% of program participants, but only 56% attended the 12-month visit. By 6 months after baseline, 59% had significantly lower fasting glucose concentrations, 59% had improvement in 2-hour glucose levels, and 61% had weight loss. Nearly 40%, however, were nonresponders and had increased fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, and weight by 6 months. By the 12-month visit, significant declines in fasting glucose (P < .001), 2-hour glucose (P < .001), and weight (P = .008) occurred in comparison with baseline values; however, no significant changes occurred in these measures between the 6and 12-month visits (P > .30 for all).ConclusionMost DEAL participants showed improvement in glucose levels and weight, but some patients exhibited worsening glucose intolerance. Factors underlying nonresponse need to be identified. Ongoing experience and analysis should help revise the DEAL program so that outcomes for all participating patients will improve. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:200-208)     

Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice: targeting insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of targeted pharmacologic interventions to reverse documented pathophysiologic abnormalities in prediabetes.MethodsPatients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were treated with insulin sensitizers (pioglitazone + metformin) or insulin sensitizers + exenatide on the basis of oral glucose tolerance testing-derived indices of insulin resistance and impaired b-cell function. Patients who declined pharmacologic therapy received lifestyle modification only.ResultsOne hundred five patients with IGT and/or IFG were treated with insulin sensitizers (pioglitazone + metformin) (n = 40), insulin sensitizers + exenatide (n = 47), or lifestyle modification only (n = 18). After a mean follow-up period of 8.9 months, the lifestyle modification group demonstrated no significant changes in fasting plasma glucose, plasma glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance testing, insulin sensitivity, or b-cell function. In the pioglitazone + metformin group (24 hours off medication), fasting plasma glucose fell from 109 to 102 mg/dL; plasma glucose area under the curve decreased by 12.0%; insulin sensitivity and b-cell function improved by 42% and 50%, respectively (all P < .001); 14.3% converted to normal glucose tolerance; and no patient developed diabetes. In the pioglitazone + metformin + exenatide group (24 hours off medication), fasting plasma glucose fell from 109 to 98 mg/dL; plasma glucose area under the curve decreased by 21.2%; insulin sensitivity and b-cell function improved by 52% and 109%, respectively (all P < .001); 59.1% of patients with IGT reverted to normal glucose tolerance; and no patient developed diabetes.ConclusionsTargeted pathophysiologic therapy based on oral glucose tolerance test-derived measures of insulin sensitivity and b-cell function can be implemented in general internal medicine and endocrine practice and is associated with marked improvement in glucose tolerance and reversion of prediabetes to normal glucose tolerance in more than 50% of patients. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18: 342-350)     

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Association between the 1-Hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and the Metabolic Syndrome in a High-Risk Sample with Impaired Fasting Glucose

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the 1-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (≥155 mg/dL) and metabolic syndrome (MS) in a sample with previous impaired fasting glucose (IFG).Methods: Three hundred and twenty four Peruvian subjects with a history of IFG ≥100 mg/dL were selected for a cross-sectional study. They underwent a 75 g OGTT and were assigned to different groups according to the result. We evaluated the association between 1-hour OGTT and MS.Results: The mean age was 56.5 ± 12.6 years and 191 (61.5%) were female. During the OGTT, we found 28 (8.6%) subjects with diabetes, 74 (22.8%) with IGT, and 222 (68.5%) with a normal glucose tolerance test with a 2-hour glucose <140 mg/dL (NGT). In the NGT group, 124 (38.3%) had 1-hour glucose levels <155 mg/dL, while 98 (30.2%) had 1-hour glucose levels ≥155 mg/dL. Evaluating the association between the 1-hour value in the OGTT and MS, we found that subjects with a 1-hour glucose ≥155 mg/dL were more than twice as likely to have MS as those with a 1-hour glucose <155 mg/dL (odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 4.57). In addition, body mass index, fasting glycemia, triglycerides, and waist circumferences were significantly higher in subjects with 1-hour glucose levels ≥155 mg/dL compared to those with 1-hour glucose levels <155 mg/dL (P<.05).Conclusion: Among subjects with IFG, performing an OGTT was helpful to identify subjects with 1-hour glucose levels ≥155 mg/dL and NGT who were significantly more likely to have MS and a worse cardiometabolic risk profile.Abbreviations: AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; IFG = impaired fasting glucose; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; MS = metabolic syndrome; NGT = normal glucose tolerance; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; OR = odds ratio; T2DM = type 2 diabetes; TG = triglycerides     

Identifying Prediabetes Using Fasting Insulin Levels

ObjectiveTo determine whether patients with prediabetes can be accurately and easily identified in clinical settings using a predictive clinical and laboratory model.MethodsThis retrospective study examined demographic and laboratory data from patients who had undergone 2-hour glucose testing for suspected prediabetes or diabetes between 2000 and 2004. Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus were excluded. Prediabetes was defined as a fasting glucose concentration ≥ 100 mg/dL and ≤ 125 mg/dL or a 2-hour postprandial glucose concentration ≥ 140 mg/dL and < 200 mg/dL. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify calculated or measured clinical and laboratory attributes that predict the presence of prediabetes, including fasting insulin quartiles, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.ResultsOf 965 patients, 287 (29.7%) had prediabetes. The study population primarily consisted of white, obese, female patients. A multivariate model revealed that compared with the referent lowest quartile of fasting insulin (m = 4.9 [± SD] ± 1.2 mIU/mL), subsequent insulin quartiles increased the likelihood of identifying prediabetes (quartile 2: m = 8.0 ± 0.8 mIU/mL, odds ratio [OR] = 2.076, confidence interval [CI] = 1.241-3.273; quartile 3: m = 12.2 ± 1.7 mIU/mL, OR = 3.151, CI = 1.981-5.015; quartile 4: m = 25.9 ± 12.4 mIU/mL, OR = 5.035, CI = 3.122-8.122). Older age and increased diastolic blood pressure also contributed modestly to this model. Further analysis using the area under the curve revealed that at a fasting insulin level > 9.0 mIU/mL, prediabetes would be correctly identified in 80% of affected patients. A second model revealed that increased HOMA-IR index (OR = 1.303, CI = 1.205-1.410) and older age (OR = 1.037, CI = 1.024-1.05) predicted prediabetes.ConclusionsThe most robust model, which used fasting insulin levels, may provide the most utility as a clinical tool because the highest quartiles suggest significantly greater likelihood of identifying prediabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:47-52)     

High Incidence of Impaired Glucose Regulation in Patients With no Known History of Diabetes Mellitus But With Hyperglycemia After Undergoing a Cardiac Surgical Procedure

ObjectiveTo determine the implications of the presence of hyperglycemia after a cardiac surgical procedure in patients with no history of diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 50 consecutive patients with no known history of DM who underwent a cardiac surgical procedure and had postoperative hyperglycemia (plasma glucose levels ≥ 110 mg/dL), requiring an insulin drip to achieve tight glucose control. These patients underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 6 weeks postoperatively to determine the percentage of subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or type 2 DM.ResultsOf the 50 patients, 32 (64%) were found to have persistent glucose dysregulation. On the basis of OGTT results, 20% had IFG, 16% had both IFG and IGT, 10% had only IGT, and 18% had type 2 DM. Of the patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, 89% had a 6-week postoperative fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration of < 126 mg/dL. There was a significant correlation between the preoperative FPG levels and the 6-week postoperative 2-hour OGTT glucose levels (P < .01). No correlation was found between the 6-week postoperative FPG levels and the 2-hour OGTT glucose levels (P = .26).ConclusionHyperglycemia after a cardiac surgical procedure implies a high risk of persistent glucose dysregulation. Preoperative FPG levels correlated better with 2-hour OGTT results than did the 6-week postoperative FPG values, but both were insensitive markers for diagnosing type 2 DM in these patients. In our cohort, hemoglobin A1c was not predictive of abnormalities of glucose metabolism. Our data support the need for performing a postoperative OGTT in patients with no known history of DM but the presence of hyperglycemia after a cardiac operation. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:425-430)     

Gender differences in adiponectin and low-grade inflammation among individuals with normal glucose tolerance,prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes

Background: Women with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher relative risk of cardiovascular disease than do men. The reason for this is unknown.Objective: We studied the gender differences in adiponectin and in low-grade inflammation, measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), in individuals with normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes.Methods: In this population-based, cross-sectional study, all individuals born in 1942, 1947, 1952, 1957, and 1962 in Pieksämäki, East Finland, were recruited for participation. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and lipid panel were performed, and concentrations of adiponectin, hs-CRP, and IL-1RA were measured. The World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for diabetes and prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) were used. Statistical comparisons between men and women were performed by a bootstrap-type ANCOVA.Results: The eligible population included 1294 middle-aged individuals, and of these, 904 (406 men and 498 women) had complete data and were included in the analyses. Absolute adiponectin concentrations were significantly higher in women at all levels of glucose tolerance (normal, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes), but the gender ratio (women to men) for adiponectin concentrations decreased linearly (P = 0.011) from normal glucose tolerance (1.61; 95% CI, 1.48–1.75) to prediabetes (1.57; 95% CI, 1.36–1.83) and diabetes (1.16; 95% CI, 0.87–1.53). Among participants with normal glucose tolerance, no significant difference was found between the sexes in hs-CRP or IL-1RA. Among patients with prediabetes or diabetes, women had significantly higher concentrations than did men for hs-CRP (for prediabetes, 2.0 vs 1.5 mg/L; ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04–1.85) and IL-1RA (for prediabetes, 255 vs 178 pg/mL; ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.121.83). The gender ratios (women to men) increased linearly from normal glucose tolerance to prediabetes and type 2 diabetes for both hs-CRP (P = 0.019) and IL-1RA (P = 0.013).Conclusions: Adiponectin concentrations in women decreased relatively more compared with men across individuals with normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes, whereas inflammatory markers increased relatively more in women. Higher inflammatory stress in women than in men with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes may explain their relatively higher cardiovascular disease risk.     

Analysis of Fasting Plasma Glucose Values for Optimal Detection of Abnormal Responses on the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in at-Risk Study Subjects

ObjectiveTo identify the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value with the best performance for detecting an abnormal response on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in patients at risk for having type 2 diabetes.MethodsAll patients who underwent a 2-hour OGTT during an 18-month period were included in this study. Pretest and posttest odds, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the FPG value most strongly associated with an abnormal result on the OGTT (either diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance [IGT]).ResultsOf the 1,371 patients who underwent an OGTT during the designated study period, 1,239 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of IGT was 25.34% (314 patients). Diabetes was diagnosed in 141 patients (11.38%). IGT was more commonly found in the FPG strata below 115 mg/dL; above this value, diabetes was more frequently diagnosed. In general, the percentage of cases of IGT increased progressively throughout the “normal” FPG range. The prevalence varied from 11.4% (in patients with FPG values < 80 mg/dL) to 32% (in those with FPG levels from 95 to 99.9 mg/dL). FPG values between 95 and 99.9 mg/dL had a likelihood ratio of 2.1 for detecting an abnormal OGTT response, of 1.8 for detecting diabetes, and of 1.66 for detecting IGT. The odds ratio for detecting either IGT or diabetes was increased 2-fold by performing an OGTT. The FPG threshold with the best ability for detecting an abnormal response on the OGTT was 95 mg/dL (sensitivity of 0.72 and specificity of 0.65).ConclusionIn patients at risk for type 2 diabetes, the FPG cut point (95 mg/dL) most useful for detecting an abnormal OGTT response is included in the normal range of the FPG. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:583-589)     

On the Status and Comparison of Glucose Intolerance in Female Breast Cancer Patients at Initial Diagnosis and during Chemotherapy through an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Aims

This study is to estimate the status and comparison of glucose intolerance in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy through an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), as well as to learn the effect of chemotherapy on the glucose metabolism of breast cancer patients.

Methods

All the 79 breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis, with the mean age of 53.2 years, and 96 breast cancer patients before the 5th or 6th cycle of chemotherapy, with the mean age of 51.5 years, participated in the study from December 2012 to October 2013. After an overnight fast, participants underwent OGTT test, and fasting and 2-hour glucose levels were measured to identify undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes (i.e., impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance) in them. Previously diagnosed diabetes among the female breast cancer patients was determined on the self-report and the medical record.

Results

The overall incidences of total normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, diabetes in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy were 24.1% and 38.5% (p<0.05), 50.6% and 28.1% (p<0.05), and 25.3% and 33.3% (p>0.05), respectively, and the differences of normal glucose tolerance and prediabetes instead of diabetes between the two groups were statistically significant. About 84% of the total diabetes and prediabetes in the female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and 79.7% of those during chemotherapy need to be diagnosed with OGTT.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients have high incidences of diabetes and prediabetes. After chemotherapy even with steroids, some breast cancer patients with abnormal glucose metabolism may even become normal. Isolated hyperglycemia 2 hours after glucose loading is common, and OGTT should be made for breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy.     

Chromium Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Sensitivity in Persons at Risk for Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of daily chromium picolinate supplementation on serum measures of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in patients at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, modified cross-over clinical trial with 6-month sequences of intervention and placebo followed by a 6-month postintervention assessment. Adult patients with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Participants received 6-month sequences of chromium picolinate or placebo at 1 of 2 dosages (500 or 1000 mcg daily). Primary outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting and 2-hour insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, blood pressure, endothelial function, hemoglobin A_1c, lipids, and urinary microalbumin.ResultsFifty-nine participants were enrolled. No changes were seen in glucose level, insulin level, or HOMA-IR (all P > .05) after 6 months of chromium at either dosage level (500 mcg or 1000 mcg daily) when compared with placebo. None of the secondary outcomes improved with either chromium dosage compared with placebo (P > .05).ConclusionsChromium supplementation does not appear to ameliorate insulin resistance or impaired glucose metabolism in patients at risk for type 2 diabetes and thus is unlikely to attenuate diabetes risk. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:16-25)     

Ethnic disparity in hemoglobin A1c levels among normoglycemic offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the racial/ethnic disparities in hemoglobin A_1c levels among nondiabetic persons with similar parental history of type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe studied a community-based sample of adult offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Measurements included anthropometry, hematology assessments, serial fasting plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance testing, plasma insulin, hemoglobin A_1c, insulin sensitivity, and b-cell function, using a homeostasis model assessment.ResultsThe study included 302 participants (135 white, 167 black). Compared with white participants, black participants had lower fasting plasma glucose levels (91.9 ± 0.51 mg/dL vs 93.6 ± 0.50 mg/dL, P = .015), lower area under the curve of plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance testing (P = <.001), higher body mass index (31.1 ± 0.61 kg/m² vs 28.5 ± 0.57 kg/m², P = <.001), and similar insulin sensitivity and b-cell function. Hemoglobin A_1c was higher in black participants than in white participants (5.68 ± 0.033% vs 5.45 ± 0.028%, P <.001). The absolute black-white difference in hemoglobin A_1c level of approximately 0.22% persisted after adjusting for age, hemoglobin, hematocrit, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, glucose area under the curve, and other covariates.ConclusionsAmong healthy offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus in this study, African American participants had higher hemoglobin A_1c levels than white participants after adjusting for age, adiposity, blood glucose, and known variables. Thus, plasma glucose level is more valid than hemoglobin A_1c for diagnosing prediabetes or diabetes in black persons. (Endocr Pract. 2012; 18:356-362)     

Prevalencia de alteraciones del metabolismo hidrocarbonado en una población infanto-juvenil con obesidad grave

IntroductionThere is currently a disproportionate increase in childhood and adolescent obesity worldwide, together with other disorders involving substantial cardiometabolic risk in adulthood, such as alterations in carbohydrate metabolism.ObjectiveTo establish the prevalence of prediabetes, defined as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) after an oral glucose tolerance test, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2) in a pediatric population with severe obesity. Additionally, we aimed to assess clinical metabolic differences between prediabetic obese patients and obese subjects without prediabetes.Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in children and adolescents with severe obesity (>97th percentile). The variables studied were age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test, insulinemia, insulin resistance assessed by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.ResultsA total of 133 patients were included: 67 boys (50.4%) and 66 girls (49.6%), with a mean age of 12.17±3.27 years. Fourteen patients (10.52%) had prediabetes (10 IFG, 3 IGT, 1 IFG+IGT): 7 girls and 8 boys, with a mean age of 13.2±3.3 years. One patient had DM2 (0.75%). Patients with prediabetes had significantly higher concentrations of fasting glucose (98±10.76 vs 88.53±6.3 mg/d; p=0.001), insulinemia (35.38±14.22 vs 22.95±14.30 μU/ml; p=0.009) and HOMA index (8.10±3.24 vs 4.89±3.27; p=0.004) than patients without impaired carbohydrate metabolism. These patients also had higher values of HbA_1c, triglycerides, blood pressure and HDL concentrations, although differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionsThe prevalence of prediabetes (IFG/IGT) in children with severe obesity was high (10.52%). These patients should therefore be investigated to establish early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Obese patients with prediabetes have significantly higher levels of insulin and insulin resistance than individuals without impaired carbohydrate metabolism.     

Colesevelam Hydrochloride to Treat Hypercholesterolemia and Improve Glycemia in Prediabetes: A Randomized,Prospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind study, adults with untreated prediabetes (2-hour postoral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] glucose ≥ 140 to 199 mg/dL, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 110 to 125 mg/ dL, or both), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL, and triglycerides < 500 mg/dL were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 16 with last observation carried forward. Secondary end points included change in FPG, hemoglobin A1c (A1C), and 2-hour post-OGTT glucose level from baseline to week 16 and attainment of LDL-C and FPG targets.ResultsIn total, 216 patients were randomized (colesevelam, 108; placebo, 108). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (mean treatment difference, -15.6%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.1%), total cholesterol (-7.2%), apolipoprotein B (-8.1%) (P < .001 for all the foregoing), FPG (median, -2.0 mg/dL; P = .02), and A1C (mean, -0.10%; P = .02). Colesevelam did not significantly change 2-hour post-OGTT glucose (-1.9 mg/dL; P = .75) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.5%; P = .80). In addition, colesevelam significantly increased triglyceride levels relative to placebo (median, 14.3%; P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving target levels with colesevelam versus placebo, respectively, was as follows: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (29% versus 11%; P < .001), A1C < 6.0% (37% versus 25%; P = .05), FPG < 110 mg/dL (48% versus 56%; P = .97), and normalization of glucose (FPG < 100 mg/dL [40% versus 23%; P = .06]). Colesevelam had a weight-neutral effect and was well tolerated.ConclusionColesevelam is an option for managing the lipid profile and normalizing glucose levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes. Further study is warranted to determine whether colesevelam slows or prevents progression of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:617-628)     

Anti-Obesity Pharmacotherapy and the Potential for Preventing Progression from Prediabetes to Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: Type 2 diabetes and its associated complications place heavy burdens on affected individuals, their caregivers, and society. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide. Attempts to combat this problem have been extended to the treatment of obesity and prevention of progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. As such, weight loss is an important component of type 2 diabetes prevention. However, successful strategies for achieving sustained weight loss have remained elusive. Although lifestyle modification remains a cornerstone of this approach, it has become clear that changes to lifestyle alone will not suffice for many patients. A pragmatic approach includes consideration of pharmacotherapeutic options.Methods: This review discusses the different pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of obesity and prediabetes.Results: Approved anti-obesity therapies and antihyperglycemic agents associated with weight loss may prove effective earlier in the treatment paradigm, and other promising agents that are in clinical development for chronic weight management show promise for both weight reduction and a reduction in the risk of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.Conclusion: Long-term evaluation of safety and efficacy is required for many of these agents before we can begin to optimize their use in clinical practice, but treatment choices for obese or prediabetic patients are increasing.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ADA = American Diabetes Association AE = adverse event AMA = American Medical Association BMI = body mass index CI = confidence interval CR = controlled release DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program IFG = impaired fasting glucose IGT = impaired glucose tolerance FDA = Food and Drug Administration FPG = fasting plasma glucose GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1 GLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist HbA_1c= glycosylated hemoglobin ITT-LOCF = intention-totreat with last observation carried forward LS = least squares NB = naltrexone/bupropion OR = odds ratio PHEN = phentermine PYE = patient years of exposure PYY = peptide YY SGLT-2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2 TPM = topiramate TZD = thiazolidinedione     

Clinical Recognition and Management of Patients with Prediabetes

Objective: Early identification and management of prediabetes is critical to prevent progression to diabetes. We aimed to assess whether prediabetes is appropriately recognized and managed among patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG).Methods: We carried out an observational study of Olmsted County residents evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1999–2017. We randomly selected 108 subjects with biochemical criteria of IFG and 105 normoglycemic subjects. We reviewed their health records at baseline (1999–2004) and during follow up (2005–2017) collecting demographic and clinical data including vitals, diagnoses, laboratory, and medications associated with cardiovascular comorbidities. The main outcome was documentation of any recognition of prediabetes and management recommendations (lifestyle changes and/or medications).Results: At baseline (1999–2004), 26.85% (29/108) of subjects with IFG were recognized as having prediabetes, and of these 75.86% (22/29) received management recommendations with 6.9% (2/29) getting metformin. During follow-up (2005–2017), 26.67% (28/105) of initial cohort of normoglycemic subjects developed incident IFG and of these, 85.71% (24/28) were recognized as having prediabetes, and 58.33% (14/24) received management recommendations. During the entire study period, 62.50% (85/136) were recognized as having prediabetes of which 75.29% (64/85) had documented management recommendations. High body mass index (BMI) (≥35) was associated with increased recognition (odds ratio &lsqb;OR] 3.66; confidence interval &lsqb;CI] 1.065, 12.500; P = .0395), and normal BMI (<25) was associated with a lack of recognition (OR 0.146; CI 0.189, 0.966; P = .0413).Conclusion: Despite evidence supporting the efficacy of lifestyle changes and medications in managing prediabetes, this condition is not fully recognized in routine clinical practice. Increased awareness of diagnostic criteria and appropriate management are essential to enhance diabetes prevention.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; EHR = electronic health records; FBG = fasting blood glucose; IFG = impaired fasting glucose; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance; OR = odds ratio     

Vitamin D Role and Use in Prediabetes

ObjectiveTo review the role of vitamin D in prediabetes on the basis of evidence from human studies.MethodsEnglish-language literature in MEDLINE (January 1969-July 2009) was searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials of vitamin D deficiency and treatment in prediabetes, including impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and metabolic syndrome. Search terms included hyperglycemia, glucose, glycohemoglobin, insulin resistance, diabetes, homeostasis model assessment, insulin secretion, vitamin D, and related terms. Publications were also identified from review articles and references in the found articles. Abstracts, conference proceedings, case reports, and letters were excluded. Articles concerning only type 1 and type 2 diabetes, hemodialysis, or hyperparathyroidism and studies in children were also excluded.ResultsVitamin D insufficiency is defined by a circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration less than 30 ng/mL, and it is prevalent in the United States (77% of the population). Most cross-sectional and prospective studies in various populations show inverse association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and fasting plasma glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, hemoglobin A_1c, metabolic syndrome, and incidence of prediabetes. A few clinical trials suggest beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation in prediabetes, including improved insulin secretion, basal fasting insulin sensitivity, and postprandial peripheral insulin resistance. The limitations of the studies are small sample size, short duration of follow-up, lack of control groups, and inability to achieve vitamin D sufficiency with treatment.ConclusionAvailable data suggest that achieving vitamin D sufficiency may be beneficial in patients with prediabetes, although clinical trials are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:476-485)     

Use of Glucose,Insulin, and C‐Reactive Protein to Determine Need for Glucose Tolerance Testing

Objective: Glucose intolerance has been shown to be a better predictor of morbidity and mortality than impaired fasting glucose. However, glucose tolerance tests are inconvenient and expensive. This study evaluated the relative frequencies of glucose intolerance and impaired fasting glucose and sought to determine if 2‐hour glucose could be predicted from simple demographic and laboratory data in an obese population. Research Methods and Procedures: Eighty‐nine obese subjects (median BMI 35 kg/m², range 30 to 40 kg/m²) underwent glucose tolerance testing. Using step‐wise linear and logistic regression analysis, fasting glucose, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP), fasting insulin, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio, sex, and age were assessed as predictors of glucose intolerance. Results: Impaired glucose tolerance was more prevalent (27%) than impaired fasting glucose (5.6%). Only fasting glucose and hsCRP were significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of impaired 2‐hour glucose (>140 mg/dL). A fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or an hsCRP > 0.32 mg/dL (upper quartile of the normal range) detected 81% (sensitivity) of obese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance; however, specificity was poor (46%). Fasting insulin ≥ 6 μU/mL had better sensitivity (92%) but poorer specificity (30%). Discussion: Impaired glucose tolerance is more common than impaired fasting glucose in an obese population. Possible strategies to avoid doing glucose tolerance tests in all obese patients would be to do glucose tolerance testing only in those whose fasting glucose is ≥ 100 mg/dL or whose hsCRP exceeds 0.32 mg/dL or those whose fasting insulin is ≥ 6 μU/mL.     

Performance of A1C Versus Ogtt for the Diagnosis of Prediabetes in a Community-Based Screening

Objective: Reliable identification of individuals at risk for developing diabetes is critical to instituting preventative strategies. Studies suggest that the accuracy of using hemoglobin A1c as a sole diagnostic criterion for diabetes may be variable across different ethnic groups. We postulate that there will be lack of concordance between A1c and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosing prediabetes across Hispanic and non-Hispanic white (NHW) populations.Methods: A total of 218 asymptomatic adults at risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) were assessed with A1c and OGTT for the diagnosis of prediabetes. Glucose homeostasis status was assigned as no diabetes (A1c <5.7% [39 mmol/mol]), prediabetes (A1c 5.7 to 6.4% [46 mmol/mol]), and T2D (A1c >6.4% [46 mmol/mol]). Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and at least one of the following: a family history of diabetes, a history of gestational diabetes, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Caucasian race, or obesity. Subjects received a fasting 75-g OGTT and A1c on the same day. Bowker's test of symmetry was employed to determine agreement between the tests.Results: Data from 99 Hispanic patients and 79 NHW patients were analyzed. There was no concordance between A1c and OGTT for Hispanic (P =.002) or NHW individuals (P =.003) with prediabetes.Conclusion: A1c is discordant with OGTT among Hispanic and NHW subjects for the diagnosis of prediabetes. Sole use of A1c to designate glycemic status will result in a greater prevalence of prediabetes among Hispanic and NHW New Mexicans.Abbreviations:A1c = hemoglobin A1cBMI = body mass indexCDC = Centers for Disease ControlCI = confidence intervalFPG = fasting plasma glucoseNHW = non-Hispanic whiteOGTT = oral glucose tolerance testT2D = type 2 diabetesWHO = World Health Organization     

Dexamethasone Stress Test: A Pilot Clinical Study for Identification of Individuals Highly Prone to Develop Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: We examined whether the “Dexamethasone Stress Test” exhibits the requisite high predictive ability to identify individuals highly prone to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: Seven years ago, we administered an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to 33 individuals without T2DM and repeated the OGTT 24 hours after a single oral dose of 8 mg dexamethasone (Dex); all participants had a first-degree relative with T2DM, and close to half had prediabetes. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all parameters derived from the OGTT before and after Dex in individuals who subsequently developed diabetes compared to individuals who did not.Results: At 7 years of follow-up, 9 individuals had developed T2DM, while 24 remained without diabetes. None of the OGTT-derived parameters before administration of Dex had an area under the ROC curve of >0.8. However, 24 hours after Dex, three parameters, including fasting plasma insulin, homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance, and 2-hour plasma glucose level, exhibited areas under the ROC curves of 0.84, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively.Conclusion: The Dexamethasone Stress Test appears to be a good to excellent test in identifying individuals highly prone to develop T2DM.Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; Dex = dexamethasone; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance; NGT = normal glucose tolerance; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PreDiab = prediabetes; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

How Much do I Give? Dose Estimation Formulas for Once-Nightly Insulin Glargine and Premeal Insulin Lispro in type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo evaluate the mathematical relationships between dosing factors in type 1 diabetic patients using multiple daily injections.MethodsIn this single-center, prospective study in type 1 diabetic patients, the basal continuous glucose monitoring glucose target was less than 130 mg/dL with fewer than 10% of 24-hour readings at less than 70 mg/dL. Basal glucose for the 4-hour meal periods was obtained from once-daily serial meal omissions. On an isocaloric, 50% carbohydrate, fixed diet, the insulin to carbohydrate ratio was adjusted to achieve a 2-to 4-hour postbolus glucose value within ± 20% of premeal glucose. For determining dosing formulas, the slope of the linear regression line comparing the variables of weight, total daily dose (TDD), total basal dose (TBD), insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio (ICR), and correction factor (CF) was determined.ResultsForty-nine patients were included. Titrating insulin glargine to the morning glucose led to hypoglycemia during the rest of the day (2 PM to 4 AM). Therefore the basal glucose target was the nondawn phenomenon portion of the day. The resulting estimation formulas could be rounded to the following:

1. Download : Download full-size image

ConclusionsSmaller insulin glargine doses to achieve control are in contrast to those much larger doses reported in clinical trials in multiple daily injection-treated type 1 diabetes in which the morning fasting glucose is the basal insulin target. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:382-386)     

Identifying Probable Diabetes Mellitus Among Hispanics/Latinos from Four U.S. Cities: Findings from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria to identify U.S. Hispanics/Latinos from diverse heritage groups with probable diabetes mellitus and assess cardiovascular risk factor correlates of those criteria.Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of data from 15,507 adults from 6 Hispanic/Latino heritage groups, enrolled in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. The prevalence of probable diabetes mellitus was estimated using individual or combinations of ADA-defined cut points. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria at identifying diabetes mellitus from ADA-defined prediabetes and normoglycemia were evaluated. Prevalence ratios of hypertension, abnormal lipids, and elevated urinary albumin-creatinine ratio for unrecognized diabetes mellitus—versus prediabetes and normoglycemia—were calculated.Results: Among Hispanics/Latinos (mean age, 43 years) with diabetes mellitus, 39.4% met laboratory test criteria for probable diabetes, and the prevalence varied by heritage group. Using the oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard, the sensitivity of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c—alone or in combination—was low (18, 23, and 33%, respectively) at identifying probable diabetes mellitus. Individuals who met any criterion for probable diabetes mellitus had significantly higher (P<.05) prevalence of most cardiovascular risk factors than those with normoglycemia or prediabetes, and this association was not modified by Hispanic/Latino heritage group.Conclusion: FPG and hemoglobin A1c are not sensitive (but are highly specific) at detecting probable diabetes mellitus among Hispanics/Latinos, independent of heritage group. Assessing cardiovascular risk factors at diagnosis might prompt multitarget interventions and reduce health complications in this young population.Abbreviations:2hPG = 2-hour post–glucose load plasma glucoseADA = American Diabetes AssociationBMI = body mass indexCV = cardiovascularFPG = fasting plasma glucoseHbA1c = hemoglobin A1cHCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of LatinosHDL-C = high-density-lipoprotein cholesterolNGT = normal glucose toleranceNHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyOGTT = oral glucose tolerance testTG = triglycerideUACR = urine albumin-creatinine ratio