Constructing Cultures Then and Now

Constructing Cultures Then and Now:. Centenary Conference Celebrating Franz Boas and the Jesup North Pacific Expedition 1897-1997. American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, November 13-17 1997.     

Understanding the Regulatory Mechanisms of Rice Tiller Angle,Then and Now

Rice is one of the most important crops worldwide, whose yield is vital to human nutrition in the context of a rapidly growing world population. Plant architecture significantly affects grain yield, which is to a large extent determined by tiller angle and tiller number. Tiller angle is the angle between the primary tiller and the main culm. Its regulation is complex and is influenced by multiple environmental and genetic factors. This review provides an overview of the regulation of tiller angle in rice, with particular focus on the roles of the growth environment and method of cultivation; phytohormones such as auxin, gibberellins, and strigolactones; gravity; and genes related to the control of tiller angle. The major research foci and the outlook for research into the regulation of tiller angle in rice are discussed.

     

Then and Now: Reappraising Freedom of the Seas in Modern Law of the Sea

The principle of freedom of the seas remains the governing paradigm of the high seas in modern law of the sea. Although the principle, as embraced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC), is no longer an absolute norm, it continues to present fundamental challenges for achieving effective conservation on the high seas as it stands in direct contrast to the conservation duty imposed on states by LOSC. The recent UN General Assembly resolution calling for the adoption of a further Implementing Agreement under LOSC to address conservation on the high seas, highlights the need to build a new ethos for management of the high seas, which will require states to loosen their firm grip on the Grotian doctrine. This article seeks to contribute toward shifting attitudes in relation to the principle of freedom through an examination of the nature and scope of the principle in its historic context and in contemporary law of the sea.     

Saccadic Compression of Rectangle and Kanizsa Figures: Now You See It,Now You Don't

Background

Observers misperceive the location of points within a scene as compressed towards the goal of a saccade. However, recent studies suggest that saccadic compression does not occur for discrete elements such as dots when they are perceived as unified objects like a rectangle.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We investigated the magnitude of horizontal vs. vertical compression for Kanizsa figure (a collection of discrete elements unified into single perceptual objects by illusory contours) and control rectangle figures. Participants were presented with Kanizsa and control figures and had to decide whether the horizontal or vertical length of stimulus was longer using the two-alternative force choice method. Our findings show that large but not small Kanizsa figures are perceived as compressed, that such compression is large in the horizontal dimension and small or nil in the vertical dimension. In contrast to recent findings, we found no saccadic compression for control rectangles.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that compression of Kanizsa figure has been overestimated in previous research due to methodological artifacts, and highlight the importance of studying perceptual phenomena by multiple methods.