Inhibition of Renal Glucose Reabsorption: A Novel Strategy for Achieving Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo review the renal handling of glucose and the role of inhibition of a sodium-glucose transporter (SGLT2) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsWe review the published data about (1) the filtration and reabsorption of glucose by the kidneys in normal subjects and patients with diabetes; (2) the deleterious effects of long-term elevation of plasma glucose levels on muscle and hepatic insulin sensitivity and beta cell function (that is, glucotoxicity); (3) the effect of inhibiting the SGLT2 transporter on the induction of glycosuria, glycemic control, insulin resistance, and beta cell dysfunction in animals and humans with diabetes; and (4) the safety of SGLT2 inhibition as a therapeutic modality to treat human T2DM.ResultsStudies in animal models of diabetes document the efficacy of the SGLT2 inhibitors in inducing glycosuria, decreasing both fasting and postprandial glucose levels, augmenting beta cell function, and enhancing hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity. In human T2DM, short-term studies with dapagliflozin (12 weeks) and sergliflozin (2 weeks) have confirmed the efficacy of these agents in improving glycemic control. Excessive urinary electrolyte or water loss, plasma electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia were not observed.ConclusionSGLT2 inhibitors represent a promising approach to the treatment of T2DM. They have the potential to be used as monotherapy, as well as in combination with all approved antidiabetic agents. Because their mechanism of action is independent of the severity of beta cell dysfunction or insulin resistance, efficacy should not decline with progressive beta cell failure or in the presence of severe insulin resistance. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:782-790)     

The Role of Bromocriptine-Qr in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Expert Panel Recommendations

ObjectiveTo review available data on the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine-QR (BQR) and to consider its role in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsPublished literature reporting the efficacy and safety of BQR in the treatment of T2DM was reviewed, including peer-reviewed abstracts and poster presentations.ResultsBQR is an oral hypoglycemic agent with a novel mechanism of action that appears to involve enhancement of morning central nervous system (CNS) dopaminergic activity, resulting in improved insulin sensitivity and reduced hepatic glucose output. Adjunctive treatment with BQR in the dosing range of 1.6 to 4.8 mg/d may result in a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) reduction in glycated hemoglobin (A1c) levels of 0.69% (0.97%, 0.41%). Treatment with BQR appears to be associated with minimal intrinsic risk of hypoglycemia, and does not appear to be associated with clinically significant adverse effects on weight, triglycerides, free fatty acids, or blood pressure.ConclusionThe favorable cardiovascular risk profile of BQR suggests that it may be useful in the treatment of patients with T2DM with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who have significant risk factors for CVD. However, knowledge of the efficacy and safety of BQR is limited by the relatively small clinical trials database. As a result, there is currently insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of adjunctive BQR in T2DM patients being treated with several common diabetes regimens (e.g., thiazolidinediones, insulin). (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:100-106)     

“Metabolic” Surgery For Treatment Of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo discuss the potential contribution of “metabolic” surgery in providing optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsA literature search was performed with use of PubMed, and the clinical experience of the authors was also considered.ResultsBariatric—or, more appropriately, metabolic—surgical procedures have been shown to provide dramatic improvement in blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and lipid control in obese patients with T2DM. In these patients, metabolic surgery involves a low risk of short-term mortality and a significant long-term survival advantage, whereas the diagnosis of diabetes is associated with significant long-term mortality. Experimental studies in animals and clinical trials suggest that gastrointestinal bypass procedures can control diabetes and associated metabolic alterations by mechanisms independent of weight loss. As a result, the use of bariatric surgery and experimental gastrointestinal manipulations to treat T2DM is increasing, even among less obese patients. Although body mass index (BMI) currently is the most important factor for identifying candidates for bariatric surgery, evidence shows that a specific cutoff BMI value cannot accurately predict successful surgical outcomes. Furthermore, BMI appears limited in defining the risk profile for patients with T2DM.ConclusionCurrent BMI-based criteria for performance of bariatric surgery are not adequate for determining eligibility for operative treatment in patients with diabetes. Large clinical trials, comparing bariatric surgery versus optimal medical care of patients with T2DM, should be given priority in order to define the role of surgery in the management of diabetes. Recognizing the need to work as a multidisciplinary team that includes endocrinologists and surgeons is an initial step in addressing the issues and opportunities that surgery offers to diabetes care and research. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:624-631)     

Hypoglycemia: Minimizing Its Impact in Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo review and discuss the risks and impact of hypoglycemia and provide guidance for the prevention of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM).MethodsWe review and discuss the risks and impact of hypoglycemia, providing specific guidance regarding the prevention of hypoglycemia and judicial selection of glucose-lowering agents in individuals with T2DM.ResultsHypoglycemia in T2DM is underrecognized and underreported. Emerging evidence from large clinical trials suggest that hypoglycemia may be an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality in T2DM. In addition, hypoglycemia is associated with reduced quality of life, greater healthcare utilization costs, and poor adherence to medical regiments.ConclusionThese findings have led professional organizations to emphasize the prevention of hypoglycemia as an important consideration when initiating or intensifying treatment regimens. In clinical settings, particular attention should be paid to a patient’s risk for hypoglycemia when initiating or intensifying the pharmacological treatment regimen. The endocrinologist can play an important role in educating not only the patient, but also other members of the diabetes-management team regarding the need for individualized therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:526-535)     

Metformin Use in Diabetes Prior to Hospitalization: Effects on Mortality in Covid-19

Objective: Although type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been reported as a risk factor for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the effect of pharmacologic agents used to treat T2DM, such as metformin, on COVID-19 outcomes remains unclear. Metformin increases the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2, a known receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Data from people with T2DM hospitalized for COVID-19 were used to test the hypothesis that metformin use is associated with improved survival in this population.Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed on de-identified clinical data from a major hospital in Wuhan, China, that included patients with T2DM hospitalized for COVID-19 during the recent epidemic. One hundred and thirty-one patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and T2DM were used in this study. The primary outcome was mortality. Demographic, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, diabetes medications, and respiratory therapy data were also included in the analysis.Results: Of these 131 patients, 37 used metformin with or without other antidiabetes medications. Among the 37 metformin-taking patients, 35 (94.6%) survived and 2 (5.4%) did not survive. The mortality rates in the metformin-taking group versus the non-metformin group were 5.4% (2/37) versus 22.3% (21/94). Using multivariate analysis, metformin was found to be an independent predictor of survival in this cohort (P = .02).Conclusion: This study reveals a significant association between metformin use and survival in people with T2DM diagnosed with COVID-19. These clinical data are consistent with potential benefits of the use of metformin for COVID-19 patients with T2DM.     

The Rationale for Prandial Glycemic Control in Diabetes Mellitus

Background:Diabetes mellitus (DM) is of epidemic proportions worldwide, and its microvascular and macrovascular complications have been well described. Achieving glycemic control has been demonstrated to reduce patients' risk of developing these complications.Objective:The objective of this article was to examine how prandial hyperglycemia-especially postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG)-affects overall glycemic control and the complications of DM and to discuss the pharmacologic agents available to reduce PPHG.Methods:Materials used for this article were identified through a MEDLINE search of the literature (1975–2006). English-language randomized, controlled, prospective, cohort, and observational studies were chosen using the search terms postprandial hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, cardiovascular disease, macrovascular disease, microvascular disease, lipidemia, and coagulation.Results:Data show that controlling prandial hyperglycemia reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) andmicrovascular complications, lowers glycosylated hemoglobin levels, causes less oxidative stress, and leads to a more favorable coagulation and postprandial lipidemia profile. Guidelines for targeting PPHG are becoming standard, and various pharmacologic agents (eg, a-glucosidase inhibitors, amylin analogues, incretin mimetics, rapid-acting insulins and insulin analogues, meglitinide analogues) that target PPHG may also improve overall glycemic control and reduce CVD risk.Conclusions:Although the level of hyperglycemia that leads to microvascular and macrovascular complications inpatients with DM remains to be elucidated, it appears prudent to address prandial hyperglycemia, especially PPHG, rather than focus solely on fasting glucose levels. Clinicians should consider incorporating agents that lower PPHG in their treatment of patients with DM.     

Basal and dynamic proinsulin-insulin relationship to assess beta-cell function during OGTT in metabolic disorders

The fasting proinsulin-to-insulin ratio is a currently used marker of beta-cell dysfunction. This ratio is calculated at the basal condition, but its behavior in dynamic conditions, i.e., during glucose stimulation, could be more informative. Given the different kinetics of the peptides, a mathematical model was necessary to analyze the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data of insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin in 55 healthy (NGT), 30 impaired glucose-tolerant (IGT), and 31 type 2 diabetic (T2DM) subjects. The model provided for secretion and disappearance of the peptides and an index of beta-cell function under dynamic conditions. Total proinsulin secretion during the OGTT was not different (P > 0.053) among NGT (0.17 +/- 0.01 mmol/l in 3 h), IGT (0.22 +/- 0.02), and T2DM (0.21 +/- 0.02) subjects. The proinsulin-to-insulin molar ratio measured from basal samples was higher (P < 0.0001) in T2DM (0.39 +/- 0.05) than in NGT (0.14 +/- 0.01) and IGT (0.13 +/- 0.02) subjects, and similar results (P < 0.003) were found by the dynamic index (0.27 +/- 0.04, 0.14 +/- 0.01, 0.15 +/- 0.01 in T2DM, NGT, IGT subjects, respectively). The basal ratio significantly correlated with the dynamic index, and the regression line slope was lower than 1 (0.43 +/- 0.08, 0.61 +/- 0.10, and 0.56 +/- 0.03 in NGT, IGT, and T2DM subjects, respectively, P < 0.0001). Impaired beta-cell function in T2DM could then be indicated by proinsulin-to-insulin indexes at both basal and dynamic phases.     

Dpp4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin As A Potential Treatment Option In Metformin-Intolerant Obese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Study

Objective: Metformin has an established role in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Some patients cannot tolerate it due to associated gastrointestinal adverse events. The present study evaluated the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor sitagliptin as a potential treatment option in metformin-intolerant PCOS.Methods: We conducted a 12-week, prospective, randomized, open-label study with 30 obese metformin-intolerant women with PCOS (age 35.0 ± 7.2 years; body mass index, 36.9 ± 5.5 kg/m²). After metformin withdrawal, they were randomized to lifestyle intervention and sitagliptin 100 mg daily (SITA) or lifestyle intervention alone as controls (CON). All participants underwent anthropometric and endocrine measurements and oral glucose tolerance testing. Model-derived indexes of insulin resistance and beta-cell function were calculated.Results: SITA improved beta-cell function as assessed by the homeostasis model assessment for beta-cell function index (HOMA-B) of 45.9 ± 35.8 (P = .001), modified beta-cell function index (MBCI) of 7.9 ± 7 (P = .002), and quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI) of -0.03 ± 0.03 (P = .002). By contrast, beta-cell function decreased in CON. The between-group differences were significant for HOMA-B (P = 0.001), MBCI (P = .010), and QUICKI (P = .025). The conversion rate to impaired glucose homeostasis was prevented in SITA: 3 of 15 subjects had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) before and after the study. In CON, none had type 2 diabetes (T2D), and 4 had IGT at the beginning. After 12 weeks, IGT was observed in 2 and T2D in 3 subjects.Conclusion: SITA improved beta-cell function and prevented a conversion to IGT and T2D in metformin-intolerant obese PCOS patients.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; DXA = dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; GIP = glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; HOMA-B = homeostasis model assessment for beta-cell function; HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IAI = insulin action index; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance; IR = insulin resistance; MBCI = modified beta-cell function index; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; QUICKI = quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome; SHBG = sex hormone–binding globulin; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Reshaping Diabetes Care: The Fundamental Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice

ObjectiveTo update clinicians on the most recent safety and efficacy data on current incretin-based strategies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsTitle searches were conducted in the Pubmed database to identify literature pertaining to the safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Product-specific title searches included the terms exenatide, liraglutide, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sita-gliptin, and vildagliptin.ResultsThe recent literature has introduced us to newer DPP-4 inhibitors and longer-acting GLP-1RAs, updated meta-analyses assessing the safety and efficacy of incretin-based therapies, and studies exploring the use of incretin-based treatments in broader clinical settings such as combination therapy with insulin. Meta-analyses have demonstrated placebo-adjusted glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions of ~1% with GLP-1RAs and 0.6 to 0.8% with DPP-4 inhibitors and have suggested cardioprotective effects such as reduction of cardiovascular events and improvement of lipid profile. As a class, these agents have consistently demonstrated low risks of hypoglycemia relative to other agents.ConclusionIncretin-based therapies are characterized by an overall favorable safety profile and weight effect, a low risk of hypoglycemia, and clinically meaningful improvements in HbA1c. Based on an expanding and favorable literature describing their use in various patient populations, the guidelines of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the recently updated guidelines from the American Diabetes Association assign these agents a central role in the treatment of T2D. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:718-728)     

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Short-Term Improvement in Vitamin D Status on Glucose Tolerance in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo study the effect of improvement in vitamin D status on glucose tolerance in Asian Indian patients with moderately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled pilot study was conducted in 28 Asian Indian patients with T2DM. Study participants were randomly assigned to a vitamin D-treated group (group D) or a placebo group (group P). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, hemoglobin A1c, and serum fructosamine levels were measured, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in all patients at baseline and 4 weeks after intervention. During the OGTT, plasma glucose and serum insulin levels were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. The unpaired t test was used to compare the groups at baseline and to compare the differences in changes from baseline to 4 weeks between the 2 study groups.ResultsGroup D and group P were similar with respect to their fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations, post-OGTT plasma glucose and serum insulin levels, and hemoglobin A1c and fructosamine values at baseline. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels increased significantly in group D at 4 weeks. No significant differences were found between the groups at baseline and 4 weeks with respect to serum fructosamine, fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin, post-OGTT plasma glucose and serum insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.ConclusionIn this study, short-term improvement in vitamin D status was not associated with improvement in glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, or insulin sensitivity in Asian Indian patients with moderately controlled T2DM.(Endocr Pract. 2010;16:600-608)     

A 24-Week,Prospective, Randomized,Open-Label,Treat-To-Target Pilot Study of Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance to Assess the Addition of Exenatide on the Efficacy of U-500 Regular Insulin Plus Metformin

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of 500 U/mL (U-500) regular insulin + metformin with U-500 regular insulin + metformin + exenatide in improving glycemic control in patients with severely insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThirty patients with T2DM and severe insulin resistance were screened, and 28 were randomized to regular insulin U-500 + metformin or the GLP-1 analog exenatide, U-500, and metformin. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels, body weight, and insulin doses were documented at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. The number and severity hypoglycemic episodes were noted.ResultsThere were 7 males and 7 females in each group (U-500 + metformin and U-500 + metformin + exenatide). Overall, U-500 insulin + metformin, either alone or with the addition of exenatide, resulted in a significant improvement in HbA_1c in both groups, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no meaningful weight change in those utilizing exenatide. Those on U-500 insulin and metformin alone had a tendency toward some weight gain. No severe hypoglycemia occurred during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more common in the group on exenatide, but this occurred in only 5 patients, and the clinical significance of this is uncertain. Insulin dosage changes on U-500 regular insulin were variable but tended to be lower in those subjects on exenatide.ConclusionsU-500 regular insulin + metformin is effective for the treatment of T2DM patients with severe insulin resistance. The addition of exenatide may ameliorate potential weight gain but provides no additional improvement in glycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1143-1150)     

Case Finding for Hypothyroidism Should Include Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome Patients: A Latin American Thyroid Society (LATS) Position Statement

Objective: Latin American Thyroid Society (LATS) Hypothyroidism Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend case finding of hypothyroid patients in multiple and different situations that agree with other Society guidelines. However, the detection of hypothyroidism in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients is not mentioned in particular. In the recent years, several basic and epidemiologic studies have appeared showing that a lower thyroid function and MetS/T2DM are associated. Hence, the aim of this review is to manifest the LATS position on the diagnosis of hypothyroidism in both MetS and T2DM patients.Methods: A search was made in PubMed using the following terms: “hypothyroidism” AND “diabetes” OR “metabolic syndrome.” The most relevant studies describing the prevalence and complications due to hypothyroidism in both MetS and T2DM patients were selected.Results: The current document reviews new information from studies that have shown that the prevalence of hypothyroidism is higher in T2DM patients (odds ratio &lsqb;OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval &lsqb;CI], 2.5 to 4.7) and that diabetic complications are more prevalent in subclinical hypothyroidism (ScH). The incidence of T2DM is 1.09-fold higher with each doubling of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) mIU/L (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.12), and the incidence of prediabetes increases 15% (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) in patients with TSH >5 mIU/L. Similarly, MetS is more prevalent in ScH compared to euthyroid individuals (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.60).Conclusion: Thyroid function is affected in MetS and T2DM, and hypothyroidism is more common in these patients. Diabetic complications are more frequent in ScH patients. Therefore, LATS now recommends aggressive case finding of hypothyroidism in both MetS and T2DM patients.Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GLUT4 = glucose transporter 4; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; HR = hazard ratio; LATS = Latin American Thyroid Society; MetS = metabolic syndrome; OR = odds ratio; ScH = subclinical hypothyroidism; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; T3 = triiodothyronine; T4 = thyroxine; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone     

Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveThe incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing at an alarming rate, especially in ethnic minorities, and T2DM is associated with significant comorbidities. The primary objective of this study was to assess glycemic control and cardiovascular risk outcomes in children with T2DM at 1 year after diagnosis. We also assessed whether insulin treatment at onset of diabetes is beneficial for overall outcome in those with elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C).MethodsA retrospective electronic chart review of non-Hispanic white (NHW) and African American (AA) children with T2DM.ResultsA total of 86 patients (66.3% females, 79.1% AA, mean age, 13.8 ± 2.4 years) with T2DM were included. Analyses of therapeutic outcome measures at the 1-year follow-up showed HbA1C <8% in 27.7% of patients, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >130 mg/dL in 12.5%, non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) >160 mg/dL in 15.6%, HDL-C <35 mg/dL in 25%, systolic hypertension (HTN) in 35.6%, and diastolic HTN in 6.8% of subjects. Among those started on insulin at initial diagnosis, there was significant improvement in glycemic outcomes (P<.0001 on insulin vs. P = .02 not on insulin) and dyslipidemia (total cholesterol [TC] [P = .001], LDL-C [P = .02], HDL-C [P = .01], non-HDL-C [P = .0002], and TC/HDL-C [P = .005]) compared with no significant change among those who did not receive insulin at diagnosis.ConclusionSubstantial numbers of children with T2DM do not achieve glycemic and cardiovascular therapeutic goals 1 year after diagnosis. Insulin therapy at diagnosis has significant beneficial effects on diabetic dyslipidemia in those with higher HbA1C. (Endocr Pract. 2013; 19:972-979)     

The role of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus

sBackground:The availability of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin gives clinicians additional treatmentoptions in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Combining rapid-acting insulin analogues with basal insulin can more closely mimic physiologic insulin release to maximize glycemic control.Objective:The objective of this article was to discuss the role of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin inthe treatment of patients with type 2 DM.Methods:Materials for this article were obtained through an online search of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google(1996-2006) using the search terms bolus insulin, postprandial, rapid-acting insulin analogues, titration, hypoglycemia, glycemic control, inhaled insulin, and insulins lispro, aspart, and glulisine.Results:Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and number of all hypoglycemic episodes were similar in patients withtype 2 DM taking either mealtime rapid-acting insulin analogues or regular human insulin (RHI). Rapid-acting insulins have been successfully used in basal-bolus regimens with a variety of long- and intermediate-acting insulins, as well as with oral hypoglycemic agents. Injectable rapid-acting insulin analogues markedly decreased postprandial glucose (PPG) levels compared with RHI. Better reduction in PPG levels may be key to achieving target A1C levels in some patients, but long-term outcome studies are needed to assess whether lowering PPG levels decreases cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 DM. Inhaled insulin may be an option for patients who cannot inject insulin, but route of administration and dosing issues limit its use in many patients. The effect of inhaled insulin on PPG is unclear at this time.Conclusions:Although rapid-acting insulin analogues are effective in the management of patients with type 2 DM, the limited numbers of studies have yet to demonstrate that these agents have any significant long-term advantage compared with RHI. In addition, they cost more than RHI. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy of the rapid-acting insulin analogues, to compare the different dosing regimens used with mealtime insulin administration, and to ascertain if the decrease in PPG levels seen with the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues translates into improved glycemic control and perhaps even a reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 DM. (Insulin. 2007;2:61-67) Copyright 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.     

Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Older Adult: A Review

ObjectiveThis review summarizes the particular challenges of diabetes in older individuals and the evidence base guiding the selection of treatment targets and strategies in this population.MethodsAn in-depth literature search was conducted to identify the evidence base from randomized, controlled, and population-based epidemiological studies, as well as guidelines derived from expert opinion.ResultsOlder patients are a highly heterogeneous population with respect to the pathogenesis and course of diabetes and, as a group, manifest significant comorbidities that impact treatment goals and strategies. There is a lack of consensus regarding “optimal” glucose targets in older patients with diabetes. Hypoglycemia is more common in the older patient, contributes to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life, and limits treatment in many cases. Duration of diabetes, comorbidities, life expectancy, and functional status are other important factors to consider when identifying appropriate glycemic goals and choosing an antihyperglycemic agent for older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).ConclusionCurrent, limited treatment recommendations in older patients with T2DM are based on expert opinion due to the general lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. This underscores the importance of individualizing pharmacologic therapy in these patients with a focus on the risk-to-benefit ratio. Additional trials in older patients are needed to assess drug safety, efficacy, and dosing. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:722-736)     

Can Newer Therapies Delay the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

ObjectiveTo review the multifactorial and progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the consequences of its progression, and the potential of traditional and newer therapies to delay the progression of this disease.MethodsThe relevant literature is reviewed, and the mechanisms of action of novel agents for treatment of T2DM are discussed.ResultsThe global prevalence of diabetes has been increasing in recent decades, reaching near-epidemic proportions, and is projected to more than double by 2030. More than 90% of cases of diabetes in most countries consist of T2DM, but many individuals remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed only after their disease has progressed considerably. Inadequate glycemic control in a majority of patients with T2DM is due to the progressive nature of the disease, delay in initiating pharmacotherapy, and failure to intensify treatment more quickly in patients who do not achieve glycemic targets. Traditional oral therapies are usually effective at lowering hyperglycemia initially but do not prevent disease progression; thus, many patients ultimately require insulin. Furthermore, because most antidiabetic therapies are associated with weight gain or risk of hypoglycemia (or both), patients may not adhere to treatment recommendations.ConclusionA new therapeutic approach focuses on the use of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. Analogues of this hormone delay the progression of β-cell dysfunction and promote β-cell regeneration in animal models. In clinical trials, they have been shown to improve glycemic control by increasing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon secretion. At high concentrations, they also slow gastric emptying and increase satiety, which often promotes weight loss. Another approach is to inhibit the enzyme dipeptidyl-peptidase 4, which rapidly inactivates glucagon-like peptide- 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, thereby increasing endogenous incretin levels. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:625-638)     

Effects of Pramlintide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Analysis Using Daily Insulin Dose Tertiles

ObjectiveThe purpose of the analysis was to investigate if the efficacy and tolerability of 6 months of pramlintide therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) differed with increasing levels of concomitant insulin doses, using data from 3 previously described clinical trials.MethodsIn this post hoc analysis, data from 2 pooled, placebo-controlled pivotal trials and 1 clinical practice trial were evaluated by baseline insulin use tertile in patients with T2DM.ResultsIn the pivotal trials, both glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and body weight decreased similarly across tertiles with pramlintide. A1C decreased slightly and body weight remained relatively unchanged across tertiles with placebo. Similarly, in the clinical practice trial, pramlintide was associated with decreases in A1C, body weight, and total daily insulin use across the tertiles. Overall, the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature, and the rate of severe hypoglycemia was low.ConclusionThese results suggest that pramlintide therapy was associated with improved A1C and decreased body weight, with a low rate of severe hypoglycemia, among patients with T2DM, regardless of baseline insulin use. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1070-1075)     

Synthesis,in vitro antitrypanosomal and antibacterial activity of phenoxy,phenylthio or benzyloxy substituted quinolones

Chagas’ disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), is one of the most serious parasitic diseases in Latin America. The currently available chemotherapy, based on nifurtimox or benznidazole, is unsatisfactory due to the limited efficacy in the prevalent chronic stage of the disease and toxic side effects. In order to address these deficiencies, a series of quinolones based novel molecules have been synthesized and evaluated as potential antitrypanosomal agents. The most active analogue 10 inhibited T. cruzi with an IC₅₀ of 1.3 μg/mL. The results of this study have implications in the development of novel quinolone’s antitrypanosomal agents.