Alteration of a nonconserved active site residue in the chemotaxis response regulator CheY affects phosphorylation and interaction with CheZ

CheY is a response regulator in the well studied two-component system that mediates bacterial chemotaxis. Phosphorylation of CheY at Asp(57) enhances its interaction with the flagellar motor. Asn(59) is located near the phosphorylation site, and possible roles this residue may play in CheY function were explored by mutagenesis. Cells containing CheY59NR or CheY59NH exhibited hyperactive phenotypes (clockwise flagellar rotation), and CheY59NR was characterized biochemically. A continuous enzyme-linked spectroscopic assay that monitors P(i) concentration was the primary method for kinetic analysis of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. CheY59NR autodephosphorylated at the same rate as wild-type CheY and phosphorylated similarly to wild type with acetyl phosphate and faster (4-14x) with phosphoramidate and monophosphoimidazole. CheY59NR was extremely resistant to CheZ, requiring at least 250 times more CheZ than wild-type CheY to achieve the same dephosphorylation rate enhancement, whereas CheY59NA was CheZ-sensitive. However, several independent approaches demonstrated that CheY59NR bound tightly to CheZ. A submicromolar K(d) for CheZ binding to CheY59NR-P or CheY.BeF(3)(-) was inferred from fluorescence anisotropy measurements of fluoresceinated-CheZ. A complex between CheY59NR-P and CheZ was isolated by analytical gel filtration, and the elution position from the column was indistinguishable from that of the CheZ dimer. Therefore, we were not able to detect large CheY-P.CheZ complexes that have been inferred using other methods. Possible structural explanations for the specific inhibition of CheZ activity as a result of the arginyl substitution at CheY position 59 are discussed.     

Crystal structures of beryllium fluoride-free and beryllium fluoride-bound CheY in complex with the conserved C-terminal peptide of CheZ reveal dual binding modes specific to CheY conformation

Chemotaxis, the environment-specific swimming behavior of a bacterial cell is controlled by flagellar rotation. The steady-state level of the phosphorylated or activated form of the response regulator CheY dictates the direction of flagellar rotation. CheY phosphorylation is regulated by a fine equilibrium of three phosphotransfer activities: phosphorylation by the kinase CheA, its auto-dephosphorylation and dephosphorylation by its phosphatase CheZ. Efficient dephosphorylation of CheY by CheZ requires two spatially distinct protein-protein contacts: tethering of the two proteins to each other and formation of an active site for dephosphorylation. The former involves interaction of phosphorylated CheY with the small highly conserved C-terminal helix of CheZ (CheZ(C)), an indispensable structural component of the functional CheZ protein. To understand how the CheZ(C) helix, representing less than 10% of the full-length protein, ascertains molecular specificity of binding to CheY, we have determined crystal structures of CheY in complex with a synthetic peptide corresponding to 15 C-terminal residues of CheZ (CheZ(200-214)) at resolutions ranging from 2.0 A to 2.3A. These structures provide a detailed view of the CheZ(C) peptide interaction both in the presence and absence of the phosphoryl analog, BeF3-. Our studies reveal that two different modes of binding the CheZ(200-214) peptide are dictated by the conformational state of CheY in the complex. Our structures suggest that the CheZ(C) helix binds to a "meta-active" conformation of inactive CheY and it does so in an orientation that is distinct from the one in which it binds activated CheY. Our dual binding mode hypothesis provides implications for reverse information flow in CheY and extends previous observations on inherent resilience in CheY-like signaling domains.     

CheZ Has No Effect on Flagellar Motors Activated by CheY13DK106YW

The behaviors of both cheZ-deleted and wild-type cells of Escherichia coli were found to be very sensitive to the level of expression of CheZ, a protein known to accelerate the dephosphorylation of the response regulator CheY-phosphate (CheY-P). However, cells induced to run and tumble by the unphosphorylated mutant protein CheY^13DK106YW (CheY**) failed to respond to CheZ, even when CheZ was expressed at high levels. Therefore, CheZ neither affects the flagellar motors directly nor sequesters CheY**. In in vitro cross-linking studies, CheY** promoted trimerization of CheZ to the same extent as wild-type CheY but failed to induce the formation of complexes of higher molecular weight observed with CheY-P. Also, CheY** could be cross-linked to FliM, the motor receptor protein, nearly as well as CheY-P. Thus, to CheZ, CheY** looks like CheY, but to FliM, it looks like CheY-P.     

Structure and catalytic mechanism of the E. coli chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ

The protein CheZ, which has the last unknown structure in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway, stimulates the dephosphorylation of the response regulator CheY by an unknown mechanism. Here we report the co-crystal structure of CheZ with CheY, Mg(2+) and the phosphoryl analog, BeF(3)(-). The predominant structural feature of the CheZ dimer is a long four-helix bundle composed of two helices from each monomer. The side chain of Gln 147 of CheZ inserts into the CheY active site and is essential to the dephosphorylation activity of CheZ. Gln 147 may orient a water molecule for nucleophilic attack, similar to the role of the conserved Gln residue in the RAS family of GTPases. Similarities between the CheY[bond] CheZ and Spo0F [bond]Spo0B structures suggest a general mode of interaction for modulation of response regulator phosphorylation chemistry.     

Action at a Distance: Amino Acid Substitutions That Affect Binding of the Phosphorylated CheY Response Regulator and Catalysis of Dephosphorylation Can Be Far from the CheZ Phosphatase Active Site

Two-component regulatory systems, in which phosphorylation controls the activity of a response regulator protein, provide signal transduction in bacteria. For example, the phosphorylated CheY response regulator (CheYp) controls swimming behavior. In Escherichia coli, the chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ stimulates the dephosphorylation of CheYp. CheYp apparently binds first to the C terminus of CheZ and then binds to the active site where dephosphorylation occurs. The phosphatase activity of the CheZ₂ dimer exhibits a positively cooperative dependence on CheYp concentration, apparently because the binding of the first CheYp to CheZ₂ is inhibited compared to the binding of the second CheYp. Thus, CheZ phosphatase activity is reduced at low CheYp concentrations. The CheZ21IT gain-of-function substitution, located far from either the CheZ active site or C-terminal CheY binding site, enhances CheYp binding and abolishes cooperativity. To further explore mechanisms regulating CheZ activity, we isolated 10 intragenic suppressor mutations of cheZ21IT that restored chemotaxis. The suppressor substitutions were located along the central portion of CheZ and were not allele specific. Five suppressor mutants tested biochemically diminished the binding of CheYp and/or the catalysis of dephosphorylation, even when the suppressor substitutions were distant from the active site. One suppressor mutant also restored cooperativity to CheZ21IT. Consideration of results from this and previous studies suggests that the binding of CheYp to the CheZ active site (not to the C terminus) is rate limiting and leads to cooperative phosphatase activity. Furthermore, amino acid substitutions distant from the active site can affect CheZ catalytic activity and CheYp binding, perhaps via the propagation of structural or dynamic perturbations through a helical bundle.     

Bacillus subtilis hydrolyzes CheY-P at the location of its action,the flagellar switch

In this report we show that in Bacillus subtilis the flagellar switch, which controls direction of flagellar rotation based on levels of the chemotaxis primary response regulator, CheY-P, also causes hydrolysis of CheY-P to form CheY and Pi. This task is performed in Escherichia coli by CheZ, which interestingly enough is primarily located at the receptors, not at the switch. In particular we have identified the phosphatase as FliY, which resembles E. coli switch protein FliN only in its C-terminal part, while an additional N-terminal domain is homologous to another switch protein FliM and to CheC, a protein found in the archaea and many bacteria but not in E. coli. Previous E. coli studies have localized the CheY-P binding site of the switch to FliM residues 6-15. These residues are almost identical to the residues 6-15 in both B. subtilis FliM and FliY. We were able to show that both of these proteins are capable of binding CheY-P in vitro. Deletion of this binding region in B. subtilis mutant fliM caused the same phenotype as a cheY mutant (clockwise flagellar rotation), whereas deletion of it in fliY caused the opposite. We showed that FliY increases the rate of CheY-P hydrolysis in vitro. Consequently, we imagine that the duration of enhanced CheY-P levels caused by activation of the CheA kinase upon attractant binding to receptors, is brief due both to adaptational processes and to phosphatase activity of FliY.     

Coordinated reversal of flagellar motors on a single Escherichia coli cell

An Escherichia coli cell transduces extracellular stimuli sensed by chemoreceptors to the state of an intracellular signal molecule, which regulates the switching of the rotational direction of the flagellar motors from counterclockwise (CCW) to clockwise (CW) and from CW back to CCW. Here, we performed high-speed imaging of flagellar motor rotation and show that the switching of two different motors on a cell is controlled coordinatedly by an intracellular signal protein, phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P). The switching is highly coordinated with a subsecond delay between motors in clear correlation with the distance of each motor from the chemoreceptor patch localized at a cell pole, which would be explained by the diffusive motion of CheY-P molecules in the cell. The coordinated switching becomes disordered by the expression of a constitutively active CheY mutant that mimics the CW-rotation stimulating function. The coordinated switching requires CheZ, which is the phosphatase for CheY-P. Our results suggest that a transient increase and decrease in the concentration of CheY-P caused by a spontaneous burst of its production by the chemoreceptor patch followed by its dephosphorylation by CheZ, which is probably a wavelike propagation in a subsecond timescale, triggers and regulates the coordinated switching of flagellar motors.     

CheX in the three-phosphatase system of bacterial chemotaxis

Bacterial chemotaxis involves the regulation of motility by a modified two-component signal transduction system. In Escherichia coli, CheZ is the phosphatase of the response regulator CheY but many other bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis, use members of the CheC-FliY-CheX family for this purpose. While Bacillus subtilis has only CheC and FliY, many systems also have CheX. The effect of this three-phosphatase system on chemotaxis has not been studied previously. CheX was shown to be a stronger CheY-P phosphatase than either CheC or FliY. In Bacillus subtilis, a cheC mutant strain was nearly complemented by heterologous cheX expression. CheX was shown to overcome the DeltacheC adaptational defect but also generally lowered the counterclockwise flagellar rotational bias. The effect on rotational bias suggests that CheX reduced the overall levels of CheY-P in the cell and did not truly replicate the adaptational effects of CheC. Thus, CheX is not functionally redundant to CheC and, as outlined in the discussion, may be more analogous to CheZ.     

Isolation and characterization of nonchemotactic CheZ mutants of Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli CheZ protein stimulates dephosphorylation of CheY, a response regulator in the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway, by an unknown mechanism. Genetic analysis of CheZ has lagged behind biochemical and biophysical characterization. To identify putative regions of functional importance in CheZ, we subjected cheZ to random mutagenesis and isolated 107 nonchemotactic CheZ mutants. Missense mutations clustered in six regions of cheZ, whereas nonsense and frameshift mutations were scattered reasonably uniformly across the gene. Intragenic complementation experiments showed restoration of swarming activity when compatible plasmids containing genes for the truncated CheZ(1-189) peptide and either CheZA65V, CheZL90S, or CheZD143G were both present, implying the existence of at least two independent functional domains in each chain of the CheZ dimer. Six mutant CheZ proteins, one from each cluster of loss-of-function missense mutations, were purified and characterized biochemically. All of the tested mutant proteins were defective in their ability to dephosphorylate CheY-P, with activities ranging from 0.45 to 16% of that of wild-type CheZ. There was good correlation between the phosphatase activity of CheZ and the ability to form large chemically cross-linked complexes with CheY in the presence of the CheY phosphodonor acetyl phosphate. In consideration of both the genetic and biochemical data, the most severe functional impairments in this set of CheZ mutants seemed to be concentrated in regions which are located in a proposed large N-terminal domain of the CheZ protein.     

Identification of the binding interfaces on CheY for two of its targets, the phosphatase CheZ and the flagellar switch protein fliM.

CheY is the response regulator protein serving as a phosphorylation-dependent switch in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. CheY has a number of proteins with which it interacts during the course of the signal transduction pathway. In the phosphorylated state, it interacts strongly with the phosphatase CheZ, and also the components of the flagellar motor switch complex, specifically with FliM. Previous work has characterized peptides consisting of small regions of CheZ and FliM which interact specifically with CheY. We have quantitatively measured the binding of these peptides to both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated CheY using fluorescence spectroscopy. There is a significant enhancement of the binding of these peptides to the phosphorylated form of CheY, suggesting that these peptides share much of the binding specificity of the intact targets of the phosphorylated form of CheY. We also have used modern nuclear magnetic resonance methods to characterize the sites of interaction of these peptides on CheY. We have found that the binding sites are overlapping and primarily consist of residues in the C-terminal portion of CheY. Both peptides affect the resonances of residues at the active site, indicating that the peptides may either bind directly at the active site or exert conformational influences that reach to the active site. The binding sites for the CheZ and FliM peptides also overlap with the previously characterized CheA binding interface. These results suggest that interaction with these three proteins of the signal transduction pathway are mutually exclusive. In addition, since these three proteins are sensitive to the phosphorylation state of CheY, it may be that the C-terminal region of CheY is most sensitive for the conformational changes occurring upon phosphorylation.     

Interaction of CheY with the C-terminal peptide of CheZ

Chemotaxis, a means for motile bacteria to sense the environment and achieve directed swimming, is controlled by flagellar rotation. The primary output of the chemotaxis machinery is the phosphorylated form of the response regulator CheY (P~CheY). The steady-state level of P~CheY dictates the direction of rotation of the flagellar motor. The chemotaxis signal in the form of P~CheY is terminated by the phosphatase CheZ. Efficient dephosphorylation of CheY by CheZ requires two distinct protein-protein interfaces: one involving the strongly conserved C-terminal helix of CheZ (CheZ_C) tethering the two proteins together and the other constituting an active site for catalytic dephosphorylation. In a previous work (J. Guhaniyogi, V. L. Robinson, and A. M. Stock, J. Mol. Biol. 359:624-645, 2006), we presented high-resolution crystal structures of CheY in complex with the CheZ_C peptide that revealed alternate binding modes subject to the conformational state of CheY. In this study, we report biochemical and structural data that support the alternate-binding-mode hypothesis and identify key recognition elements in the CheY-CheZ_C interaction. In addition, we present kinetic studies of the CheZ_C-associated effect on CheY phosphorylation with its physiologically relevant phosphodonor, the histidine kinase CheA. Our results indicate mechanistic differences in phosphotransfer from the kinase CheA versus that from small-molecule phosphodonors, explaining a modest twofold increase of CheY phosphorylation with the former, observed in this study, relative to a 10-fold increase previously documented with the latter.     

Characterization of the CheAS/CheZ complex: a specific interaction resulting in enhanced dephosphorylating activity on CheY-phosphate

The cheA gene encodes two overlapping polypeptides with a common carboxyl terminus: CheA_L and CheA_S. CheA_L plays a central role in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signalling pathway by autophosphorylation and transferring the phosphate to both CheY and CheB. On the other hand, the physiological functions of CheA_S remain unknown.
We have observed that overproduction of CheA_S in wild-type cells increased counterclockwise-biased flagellar rotation, and this effect is dependent on the presence of CheZ. CheZ specifically facilitates CheY-phosphate (CheY-P) dephosphorylation and generates a smooth swimming signal. A physical interaction was detected between CheZ and CheA_S in wild-type cell lysates by immunoprecipitation. The CheA_S/CheZ interaction does not require other chemotaxis components, as we could form the complex using purified CheA_S and CheZ proteins. The ability of CheA_S to bind to CheZ depends on its being in the reduced state. We found that under non-reducing conditions, CheA_S appears to form intermolecular disulphide bonds and loses the ability to bind to CheZ. Finally, the CheA_S/CheZ complex formed in vitro shows a greater dephosphorylating activity on CheY-P than does free CheZ.     

The structures of T87I phosphono-CheY and T87I/Y106W phosphono-CheY help to explain their binding affinities to the FliM and CheZ peptides

CheY is a response regulator in bacterial chemotaxis. Escherichia coli CheY mutants T87I and T87I/Y106W CheY are phosphorylatable on Asp57 but unable to generate clockwise rotation of the flagella. To understand this phenotype in terms of structure, stable analogs of the two CheY-P mutants were synthesized: T87I phosphono-CheY and T87I phosphono-CheY. Dissociation constants for peptides derived from flagellar motor protein FliM and phosphatase CheZ were determined for phosphono-CheY and the two mutants. The peptides bind phosphono-CheY almost as strongly as CheY-P; however, they do not bind T87I phosphono-CheY or T87I/Y106W phosphono-CheY, implying that the mutant proteins cannot bind FliM or CheZ tightly in vivo. The structures of T87I phosphono-CheY and T87I/Y106W phosphono-CheY were solved to resolutions of 1.8 and 2.4 Å, respectively. The increased bulk of I87 forces the side-chain of Y106 or W106, into a more solvent-accessible conformation, which occludes the peptide-binding site.     

The structure and dynamic properties of the complete histidine phosphotransfer domain of the chemotaxis specific histidine autokinase CheA from Thermotoga maritima

The bacterial histidine autokinase CheA contains a histidine phosphotransfer (Hpt) domain that accepts a phosphate from the catalytic domain and donates the phosphate to either target response regulator protein, CheY or CheB. The Hpt domain forms a helix-bundle structure with a conserved four-helix bundle motif and a variable fifth helix. Observation of two nearly equally populated conformations in the crystal structure of a Hpt domain fragment of CheA from Thermotoga maritima containing only the first four helices suggests more mobility in a tightly packed helix bundle structure than previously thought. In order to examine how the structures of Hpt domain homologs may differ from each other particularly in the conformation of the last helix, and whether an alternative conformation exists in the intact Hpt domain in solution, we have solved a high-resolution, solution structure of the CheA Hpt from T. maritima and characterized the backbone dynamics of this protein. The structure contains a four-helix bundle characteristic of histidine phosphotransfer domains. The position and orientation of the fifth helix resembles those in known Hpt domain crystal and solution structures in other histidine kinases. The alternative conformation that was reported in the crystal structure of the CheA Hpt from T. maritima missing the fifth helix is not detected in the solution structure, suggesting a role for the fifth helix in providing stabilizing forces to the overall structure.     

Identification of a fourth cheY gene in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and interspecies interaction within the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway

The Escherichia coli chemotaxis signal transduction pathway has: CheA, a histidine protein kinase; CheW, a linker between CheA and sensory proteins; CheY, the effector; and CheZ, a signal terminator. Rhodobacter sphaeroides has multiple copies of these proteins (2 x CheA, 3 x CheW and 3 x CheY, but no CheZ). In this study, we found a fourth cheY and expressed these R. sphaeroides proteins in E. coli. CheA2 (but not CheA1) restored swarming to an E. coli cheA mutant (RP9535). CheW3 (but not CheW2) restored swarming to a cheW mutant of E. coli (RP4606). R. sphaeroides CheYs did not affect E. coli lacking CheY, but restored swarming to a cheZ strain (RP1616), indicating that they can act as signal terminators in E. coli. An E. coli CheY, which is phosphorylated but cannot bind the motor (CheY109KR), was expressed in RP1616 but had no effect. Overexpression of CheA2, CheW2, CheW3, CheY1, CheY3 and CheY4 inhibited chemotaxis of wild-type E. coli (RP437) by increasing its smooth-swimming bias. While some R. sphaeroides proteins restore tumbling to smooth-swimming E. coli mutants, their activity is not controlled by the chemosensory receptors. R. sphaeroides possesses a phosphorelay cascade compatible with that of E. coli, but has additional incompatible homologues.     

Structural Basis for the Localization of the Chemotaxis Phosphatase CheZ by CheAS

CheA-short interacts with CheZ to localize CheZ to cell poles. The fifth helical region (residues 112 to 133) from the phosphotransfer domain of CheA interacts with CheZ and becomes ordered and helical, although it lacks a stable fold in the CheA fragment comprising residues 98 to 150 alone. One CheA molecule binds to one CheZ dimer.During bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane receptors regulate the activity of the chemotaxis-specific histidine autokinase CheA with the aid of a coupling protein, CheW. CheA acts to phosphorylate the response regulator CheY and the response regulator domain of the methylesterase CheB. Phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P) binds to the “switch complex” in the flagellar motor to regulate the sense of rotation of the motor. CheZ acts as a CheY phosphate phosphatase.Maddock and Shapiro (4) showed that the chemotaxis receptors tend to be clustered and often located at polar ends of bacterial cells. This localization of receptors is in large part dependent on the presence of CheA and CheW, and the clusters that form in wild-type cells contain receptors, CheA, CheW, CheY, and CheZ (8). These clusters are essential for proper communication among receptors and other members of the signal transduction complex.In Escherichia coli and many related bacteria, a naturally occurring short form of CheA (CheA_S) (7) interacts with CheZ, enhances the rate of dephosphorylation of CheY-P (5, 10), and is responsible for the localization of CheZ to the polar assemblies of receptors, CheA, and CheW (1). Having the kinase and the phosphatase colocalized generates more uniform CheY levels within the bacterial cell (9).In order to understand the structural basis of the CheA_S-CheZ interaction, we examined a CheA fragment containing residues 98 to 150 (CheA_98-150). This fragment begins at the alternative site of translation initiation for CheA_S and extends into the linker region joining the histidine phosphotransfer domain to the CheY-binding domain. This fragment includes residues that correspond to the C terminus of the fourth helix and the complete fifth helix of the intact histidine phosphotransfer domain, also known as the P1 domain. Figure ​Figure11 depicts the binding of CheA_98-150 to CheZ, detected by changes in the fluorescence of the tryptophan residues of CheZ. The data points represent the fluorescence intensities from the complex, plotted against CheA_98-150 concentrations. Assay results were collected in triplicate, and the data points indicate the mean values. The fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength, 295 nm; emission wavelength, 340 nm) was monitored after each addition and corrected for the blank buffer. The solid lines represent least-squares fits to a two-state binding model. As shown in Fig. ​Fig.1,1, CheA_98-150 binds to CheZ with a dissociation constant in the nanomolar range, with a stoichiometry of one CheA_98-150 molecule per CheZ dimer.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence detection of the interactions of wild-type CheZ (A) and CheZ_65-139 (B) with CheA_98-150. Wild-type CheZ and CheZ_65-139 (both present at 1.0 μM) were titrated with CheA_98-150 to produce saturation binding curves at 25°C. The dissociation constants fit to values between 10 and 30 nM but are too strong to be determined accurately at these CheZ concentrations. arb units, arbitrary units.Figure ​Figure22 shows the ¹H-¹⁵N correlation spectrum for CheA_98-150. The resonances were mostly resolved and sharp, with a limited dispersion of chemical shifts along the ¹H dimension, suggesting a high degree of backbone mobility (2). Complete backbone assignments for the nonproline residues in CheA_98-150 were made using standard HNCACB and CBCA(CO)NH methods (6). We have assigned Glu100 through His154 (a residue of the His₆ tag). Although the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra and ¹⁵N relaxation properties (3) suggest that this fragment has no stable structure under these conditions, the central region (Asp112 to Glu133) exhibits positive (¹H-)¹⁵N nuclear Overhauser effects and large, positive (up to 2.6 ppm) Cα secondary shifts (11), consistent with a partially rigid, helical structure.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.¹H-¹⁵N heteronuclear single-quantum coherence spectra of 100 mM ¹⁵N-labeled CheA_98-150 in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 200 mM unlabeled CheZ. Amino acid residues disappearing (black) or displaying significant chemical-shift perturbations (red) are identified.To establish which residues of CheA_98-150 are involved in CheZ binding, we titrated ¹⁵N-labeled CheA_98-150 with unlabeled wild-type CheZ. The spectra were collected using a mixture of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA, and 2 mM dithiothreitol at 25°C. The ¹H-¹⁵N resonances from Asp112 to Glu133, the fifth helix of the N-terminal domain in CheA, weakened as CheZ was added, and these peaks disappeared with the addition of two molar equivalents of CheZ subunits. A new set of resonances, albeit somewhat broadened, appeared near Asp112 to Glu133, suggesting that these residues are at the periphery of the binding region and retain sufficient mobility in the bound state to be observed. New resonances for these residues from the bound state strengthened, whereas resonances from the free state weakened, as the CheZ concentration increased. This pattern of resonance changes is characteristic of an interaction that is in the slow-exchange regime on the NMR time scale. The disappearance of the CheA resonances at a 1:2 ratio with CheZ again indicates that the binding stoichiometry is two CheZ monomers per CheA_98-150 molecule, and the bound complex in the protonated form is likely too large (∼100 kDa) or elongated to be observed.To examine the CheA-CheZ interaction in more detail, we assigned the amide resonances from CheA_98-150 in a complex with a shortened form of CheZ comprising residues 65 to 139 (CheZ_65-139). We chose to focus on this central region of CheZ because it gave sharper CheA resonances in the complex but still bound CheA_98-150 very strongly. The ¹³C backbone chemical shifts of the bound form of CheA_98-150 support a fully helical structure (12) for the region of Asp 112 to Glu133.Results from chemical shift perturbation experiments with CheZ_65-139 indicate that the CheA_98-150-binding site in CheZ is the helix bundle tip, where several aromatic residues cluster (data not shown). Several extreme-upfield methyl proton resonances of CheZ_65-139 shifted downfield upon binding with CheA_98-150, indicating a reorganization of aliphatic methyl groups and aromatic rings in CheZ. Many CheZ_65-139 resonances shifted upon binding, strongly indicating that CheA_S induces global structural changes that propagate from the binding site toward the central, CheY-binding region. This possibility is consistent with the observed perturbations of histidine side chain resonances of CheZ_65-139 at the other end of the helix bundle (data not shown). The imidazole rings from the four histidines in a CheZ_65-139 dimer are situated 25 to 30 Å from the helix bundle tip. The resonances from the imidazole nitrogen atoms and carbon-bound protons detected by ¹H-¹⁵N correlation spectra are clearly affected by the binding of CheA_98-150.We identified the region from Asp112 to Glu133 in CheA_98-150 as being responsible for CheZ binding. This region corresponds to the fifth helix in the intact P1 domain of CheA. NMR data indicate that this region is still mildly helical in CheA_98-150, although it lacks folding cooperativity. The helical content is enhanced by CheZ binding. A model of the complex with one CheA and two CheZ molecules was built (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). The CheA_S helix formed by residues 112 to 133 is shown bound to an opening formed by the two helical hairpins in a CheZ dimer. A space-filling model (not shown) indicates that there is not enough room to accommodate the CheA helix, suggesting that near the hairpin turn region the four-helix bundle of CheZ expands upon the binding of CheA_S, resulting in structural changes remote from the binding area. This assumption is consistent with the extensive peak movements observed in the CheZ_65-139 spectrum upon the binding of CheA_S. These binding-induced structural changes near the middle of the CheZ helical bundle are likely to be responsible for enhanced CheY-P-binding affinity and/or catalysis of phosphate hydrolysis, leading to increased CheY-P phosphatase activity.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Model of the CheZ-CheA_S interaction. The model shows residues 65 to 139 of CheZ as a helical ribbon (Protein Data Bank identification number 1KMI). The cluster of aromatic residues in CheZ is shown in magenta, and the helical CheA residues 112 to 133 are shown end-on with blue and red side chains. The CheA helix (residues 112 to 133) was taken from the known structure of the Htp domain of CheA (Protein Data Bank identification number 1I5N) and manually docked with CheZ to maximize hydrophobic contact.     

The structure of alpha-parvin CH2-paxillin LD1 complex reveals a novel modular recognition for focal adhesion assembly

Alpha-parvin is an essential component of focal adhesions (FAs), which are large multiprotein complexes that link the plasma membrane and actin cytoskeleton. Alpha-parvin contains two calponin homology (CH) domains and its C-terminal CH2 domain binds multiple targets including paxillin LD motifs for regulating the FA network and signaling. Here we describe the solution structure of alpha-parvin CH2 bound to paxillin LD1. We show that although CH2 contains the canonical CH-fold, a previously defined N-terminal linker forms an alpha-helix that packs unexpectedly with the C-terminal helix of CH2, resulting in a novel variant of the CH domain. Importantly, such packing generates a hydrophobic surface that recognizes the Leu-rich face of paxillin-LD1, and the binding pattern differs drastically from the classical paxillin-LD binding to four-helix bundle proteins such as focal adhesion kinase. These results define a novel modular recognition mode and reveal how alpha-parvin associates with paxillin to mediate the FA assembly and signaling.     

Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis

The x-ray crystal structure of the P1 or H domain of the Salmonella CheA protein has been solved at 2.1-A resolution. The structure is composed of an up-down up-down four-helix bundle that is typical of histidine phosphotransfer or HPt domains such as Escherichia coli ArcB(C) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ypd1. Loop regions and additional structural features distinguish all three proteins. The CheA domain has an additional C-terminal helix that lies over the surface formed by the C and D helices. The phosphoaccepting His-48 is located at a solvent-exposed position in the middle of the B helix where it is surrounded by several residues that are characteristic of other HPt domains. Mutagenesis studies indicate that conserved glutamate and lysine residues that are part of a hydrogen-bond network with His-48 are essential for the ATP-dependent phosphorylation reaction but not for the phosphotransfer reaction with CheY. These results suggest that the CheA-P1 domain may serve as a good model for understanding the general function of HPt domains in complex two-component phosphorelay systems.     

CheZ-mediated dephosphorylation of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis response regulator CheY: role for CheY glutamate 89

The swimming behavior of Escherichia coli at any moment is dictated by the intracellular concentration of the phosphorylated form of the chemotaxis response regulator CheY, which binds to the base of the flagellar motor. CheY is phosphorylated on Asp57 by the sensor kinase CheA and dephosphorylated by CheZ. Previous work (Silversmith et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276:18478, 2001) demonstrated that replacement of CheY Asn59 with arginine resulted in extreme resistance to dephosphorylation by CheZ despite proficient binding to CheZ. Here we present the X-ray crystal structure of CheYN59R in a complex with Mn(2+) and the stable phosphoryl analogue BeF(3)(-). The overall folding and active site architecture are nearly identical to those of the analogous complex containing wild-type CheY. The notable exception is the introduction of a salt bridge between Arg59 (on the beta3alpha3 loop) and Glu89 (on the beta4alpha4 loop). Modeling this structure into the (CheY-BeF(3)(-)-Mg(2+))(2)CheZ(2) structure demonstrated that the conformation of Arg59 should not obstruct entry of the CheZ catalytic residue Gln147 into the active site of CheY, eliminating steric interference as a mechanism for CheZ resistance. However, both CheYE89A and CheYE89Q, like CheYN59R, conferred clockwise flagellar rotation phenotypes in strains which lacked wild-type CheY and displayed considerable (approximately 40-fold) resistance to dephosphorylation by CheZ. CheYE89A and CheYE89Q had autophosphorylation and autodephosphorylation properties similar to those of wild-type CheY and could bind to CheZ with wild-type affinity. Therefore, removal of Glu89 resulted specifically in CheZ resistance, suggesting that CheY Glu89 plays a role in CheZ-mediated dephosphorylation. The CheZ resistance of CheYN59R can thus be largely explained by the formation of the salt bridge between Arg59 and Glu89, which prevents Glu89 from executing its role in catalysis.     

Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli

A well-characterized protein phosphorelay mediates Escherichia coli chemotaxis towards the amino acid attractant aspartate. The protein CheY shuttles between flagellar motors and methyl-accepting chemoreceptor (MCP) complexes containing the linker CheW and the kinase CheA. CheA-CheY phosphotransfer generates phospho-CheY, CheY-P. Aspartate triggers smooth swim responses by inactivation of the CheA bound to the target MCP, Tar; but this mechanism alone cannot explain the observed response sensitivity. Here, we used behavioral analysis of mutants deleted for CheZ, a catalyst of CheY-P dephosphorylation, or the methyltransferase CheR and/or the methylesterase CheB to examine the roles of accelerated CheY-P dephosphorylation and MCP methylation in enhancement of the chemotactic response. The extreme motile bias of the mutants was adjusted towards wild-type values, while preserving much of the aspartate response sensitivity by expressing fragments of the MCP, Tsr, that either activate or inhibit CheA. We then measured responses to small jumps of aspartate, generated by flash photolysis of photo-labile precursors. The stimulus-response relation for Delta cheZ mutants overlapped that for the host strains. Delta cheZ excitation response times increased with stimulus size consistent with formation of an occluded CheA state. Thus, neither CheZ-dependent or independent increases in CheY-P dephosphorylation contribute to the excitation response. In Delta cheB Delta cheR or Delta cheR mutants, the dose for a half-maximal response, [Asp](50), was ca 10 microM; but was elevated to 100 microM in Delta cheB mutants. In addition, the stimulus-response relation for these mutants was linear, consistent with stoichiometric inactivation, in contrast to the non-linear relation for wild-type E. coli. These data suggest that response sensitivity is controlled by differential binding of CheR and/or CheB to distinct MCP signaling conformations.