Patterning the female side of Arabidopsis: the importance of hormones

The study of floral organ development has been a driving force in plant developmental biology research for the last two decades, and there is now an enormous wealth of information about the genetic networks underlying the specification of floral organ identity and the acquisition of its final morphology and function. These and parallel studies on leaf morphogenesis and development have made evident the common evolutionary origin of all plant lateral organs and the recurrent use of variations in the regulatory circuits involved in the shaping of leaves and flowers. This review summarizes the latest progress on the study of the development of the gynoecium, the female reproductive organ of the flower, stressing the connections with the developmental programme of leaf morphogenesis, and highlighting the common role of hormonal cues in these processes.     

Genetic evidence for polarities that regulate leaf morphogenesis

Leaf morphogenesis is a fundamental process of shoot morphogenesis, since the leaf is the basic organ of the shoot. However, leaf morphogenesis is still poorly understood, in particular in dicotyledonous plants, because of the complex nature of the development of leaves. Thus, the mechanisms regulating each process of the morphogenesis, such as leaf determination, establishment of dorsoventrality, and polarity recognition, remain unknown. Developmental genetics seems to prove the most suitable approach to such processes and should allow us to dissect the relevant developmental pathways into genetically programmed, unit processes. The techniques of developmental genetics have been applied to studes of leaf morphogenesis of model plants, such asArabidopsis thaliana andAntirrhinum majus, and have recently revealed several important steps in leaf morphogenesis. The review will focus on genetic evidence for polarities that regulate leaf morphogenesis. Hypothetical mechanisms for leaf morphogenesis will be also discussed, based on the genetic data. Receipt of the Botanical Society Award of Young Scientists, 1996.     

Cellular Differentiation and Leaf Morphogenesis in Arabdopsis

A focused approach that exploits a single plant species, namely, Arabidopsis thaliana, as a means to understand how leaf cells differentiate and the factors that govern overall leaf morphogenesis has begun to generate a significant body of knowledge in this model plant. Although many studies have concentrated on specific cell types and factors that control their differentiation, some degree of consensus is starting to be reached. However, an understanding of specific mechanisms by which cells differentiate in relation to their position, that appears to be an overriding factor in this process, is not yet in place for cell types in the Arabidopsis leaf. It is clear that perturbations in cellular development within the leaf do not necessarily have a general effect on morphogenesis. Environmental factors, particularly light, have been known to affect leaf cell differentiation and expansion, and endogenous hormones also appear to play an important role, through mechanisms that are beginning to be uncovered. It is likely that continued identification of genes involved in leaf development and their regulation in relation to positional information or other cues will lead to a clearer understanding of the control of differentiation and morphogenesis in the Arabidopsis leaf.     

The integration of cell proliferation and growth in leaf morphogenesis

A number of recent publications have assessed the outcome on leaf development of targeted manipulation of cell proliferation. The results of these investigations have awakened interest in the long-standing debate in plant biology on the precise role of cell division in morphogenesis. Does cell proliferation drive morphogenesis (cell theory) or is it subservient to a mechanism which acts at the whole organ level to regulate morphogenesis (organismal theory)? In this review, the central role of growth processes (distinct from cell proliferation) in morphogenesis is highlighted and the limitations in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of plant growth control are highlighted. Finally, an attempt is made to demonstrate how sequential local co-ordination of growth might provide an interpretation of some of the recent observations on cell proliferation and leaf morphogenesis.     

Developmental genetics of leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledonous plants

A full understanding of the leaf is essential for a full understanding of plant morphology. However, leaf morphogenesis is still poorly understood, in particular in dicotyledonous plants, because of the complex nature of the development of leaves. Mutational analysis seems to be the most suitable strategy for investigations of such processes, and should allow us to dissect the developmental pathways into genetically programmed unit processes. The techniques of developmental genetics have been applied to the study of leaf morphogenesis in model plants, such asArabidopsis thaliana, and several key processes in leaf morphogenesis have been identified. The fundamental processes in leaf morphogenesis include the identification of leaf organs, determination of leaf primordia (occurrence of marginal meristem), and the polar or non-polar elongation of leaf cells. This review will focus on the genes that are essential for these processes and have been identified in mutational analyses. Mutational analyses of the photomorphogenesis is also briefly summarized from the perspective of the plasticity of leaf morphogenesis.     

Thinking about Bacillus subtilis as a multicellular organism

Initial attempts to use colony morphogenesis as a tool to investigate bacterial multicellularity were limited by the fact that laboratory strains often have lost many of their developmental properties. Recent advances in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying colony morphogenesis have been made possible through the use of undomesticated strains. In particular, Bacillus subtilis has proven to be a remarkable model system to study colony morphogenesis because of its well-characterized developmental features. Genetic screens that analyze mutants defective in colony morphology have led to the discovery of an intricate regulatory network that controls the production of an extracellular matrix. This matrix is essential for the development of complex colony architecture characterized by aerial projections that serve as preferential sites for sporulation. While much progress has been made, the challenge for future studies will be to determine the underlying mechanisms that regulate development such that differentiation occurs in a spatially and temporally organized manner.     

植物叶发育的分子机理

叶是植物进行光合作用和蒸腾作用的主要场所, 对植物的生长发育具有重要的作用。叶的发育包括叶原基的形成和极性的建立, 大量研究表明, 叶发育建成受到众多转录因子、小分子RNA以及生长素等因子的调控。文章综述了近年来叶发育和形态建成的分子机制研究进展, 以期了解叶发育的调控网络。     

植物叶缘形态的发育调控机理

生物多样性研究的关键问题之一是表型多样性的形成和演化机制, 因为表型多样性与物种多样性密切相关, 同时又承载着遗传和环境的变异信息。植物的叶具有丰富的形态多样性, 而叶形多样性很大程度上体现在叶边缘形态的变异。叶边缘的形态可从全缘、锯齿状到具有不同程度(深浅)和不同式样(羽状或掌状、回数等)的裂片(在发育研究中复叶的小叶也描述为裂片)。关于叶缘齿/裂的发育调控机制, 在拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)、碎米荠(Cardamine hirsuta)、番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)等模式植物中已有较深入的探讨。研究发现, 很多转录因子、小分子RNA及植物激素对叶齿/裂或小叶的形成具有调控作用, 其中生长素输出途径中的转录因子NAM/CUC、miR164以及高浓度生长素的反馈调控可能起到核心作用, 而且该调控模块在真双子叶植物中较为保守; TCP类、SPL类转录因子和其他一些miRNA也在生长素输出途径中发挥作用; 关于KNOX家族转录因子的作用, 虽然多数研究是围绕复叶的形态建成, 但也有数据显示其在叶裂发育中发挥作用。此外, 对拟南芥和碎米荠等十字花科植物的研究还发现, 调控基因RCO通过抑制小叶/裂片之间的细胞增殖而对小叶/叶裂的发育发挥作用。本文综述上述多角度的研究进展, 并尝试概括叶边缘形态的发育调控网络, 为关于叶缘形态多样性形成机制的研究提供可参考的切入点。     

The mechanism of leaf morphogenesis

Whether cell division is a driving force in plant morphogenesis has long been debated. In this review, the evidence for the existence of cell division-dependent and cell division-independent mechanisms of plant morphogenesis is discussed. The potential mechanisms themselves are then analysed, as is our understanding of the regulation of these mechanisms and how they are integrated into development, with particular emphasis on data arising from the investigation of leaf morphogenesis. The analysis indicates the existence of both cell division-dependent and cell division-independent mechanisms in leaf morphogenesis and highlights the importance of future investigations to unravel the co-ordination of these mechanisms.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">In vitro</Emphasis> morphogenesis in plants-recent advances

Summary The capacity of cultured plant tissues and cells to undergo morphogenesis, resulting in the formation of discrete organs or whole plants, has provided opportunities for numerous applications of in vitro plant biology in studies of basic botany, biochemistry, propagation, breeding, and development of transgenic crops. While the fundamental techniques to achieve in vitro plant morphogenesis have been well established for a number of years, innovations in particular aspects of the technology continue to be made. Tremendous progress has been made in recent years regarding the genetic bases underlying both in vitro and in situ plant morphogenesis, stimulated by progress in functional genomics research. Advances in the identification of specific genes that are involved in plant morphogenesis in vitro, as well as some selected technical innovations, will be discussed. REPRINTED FROM: Phillips, G. C. In vitro morphogenesis in plants-recent advances. In: Goodman, R. M., ed. Encyclopedia of plant and crop science, vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2004: 579–583, http://www.dekker.com/servlet/product/DOI/101081EEPCS120010554; by courtesy of Marcel Dekker, Inc.     

Morphogenesis of Pistillate Flowers of Cercidiphyllum japonicum （Cercidiphyllaceae）

Floral morphogenesis and the development of Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Sieb. et Zucc. were observed by scanning electron microscopy （SEM）. The results showed that the pistillate inflorescences were congested spikes with the flowers arranged opposite. Great differences between the so-called ＂bract＂ and the vegetative leaf were observed both in morphogenesis and morphology. In morphogenesis, the ＂bract＂ primordium is crescent-shaped, truncated at the apex and not conduplicate, has no stipule primordium at the base but does have some inconspicuous teeth in the margin that are not glandular. The leaf primordium is triangular, cycloidal at the apex, conduplicate, has two stipule primordia at the base, has one gland-tooth at the apex occurring at first and some gland-teeth in the margin that occur later. In morphology, the ＂bract＂ is also different to the vegetative leaf in some characteristics that were also illustrated in the present paper. Based on the hypothesis that the bract is more similar to the vegetative leaf than the tepal, we considered that the so-called ＂bract＂ of C.japonicum might be the tepal of the pistillate flower in morphological nature. Therefore, each pistillate flower contains a tepal and a carpel. We did not find any trace of other floral organs in the morphogenesis of the pistillate flower. Therefore we considered that the unicarpellate status of extant Cercidiphyllum might be to highly reduce and advance characteristics that make the extant Cercidiphyllum isolated from both fossil Cercidiphyllum-like plants and its extant affinities.     

Morphogenesis of Pistillate Flowers of Cercidiphyllum japonicum(Cercidiphyllaceae)

Floral morphogenesis and the development of Cercidiphyllum japonicum Sieb.et Zucc.were observed by scanning electronmicroscopy(SEM).The results showed that the pistillate inflorescences were congested spikes with the flowers arrangedopposite.Great differences between the so-called"bract"and the vegetative leaf were observed both in morphogenesis andmorphology.In morphogenesis,the"bract"primordium is crescent-shaped,truncated at the apex and not conduplicate,has no stipule primordium at the base but does have some inconspicuous teeth in the margin that are not glandular.Theleaf primordium is triangular,cycloidal at the apex,conduplicate,has two stipule primordia at the base,has one gland-toothat the apex occurring at first and some gland-teeth in the margin that occur later.In morphology,the"bract"is also differentto the vegetative leaf in some characteristics that were also illustrated in the present paper.Based on the hypothesis thatthe bract is more similar to the vegetative leaf than the tepal,we considered that the so-called"bract"of C.japonicum mightbe the tepal of the pistillate flower in morphological nature.Therefore,each pistillate flower contains a tepal and a carpel.We did not find any trace of other floral organs in the morphogenesis of the pistillate flower.Therefore we consideredthat the unicarpellate status of extant Cercidiphyllum might be to highly reduce and advance characteristics that make theextant Cercidiphyllum isolated from both fossil Cercidiphyllum-like plants and its extant affinities.     

A DELLAcate balance: the role of gibberellin in plant morphogenesis

The importance of gibberellin (GA) in vegetative and reproductive development has been known for some time. Recent studies have uncovered new roles of GA in leaf differentiation, photomorphogenesis and pollen-tube growth. Significant contributions to our understanding of GA-regulated morphogenesis include the identification of upstream regulators of GA biosynthesis, the elucidation of the function of GA signaling components, and the isolation of downstream targets. In addition, the mechanisms of interactions between GA and other hormone pathways are beginning to be revealed at the molecular level.     

Alternative modes of leaf dissection in monocotyledons

Although a majority of monocotyledons have simple leaves, pinnately or palmately dissected blades are found in four orders, the Alismatales, Pandanales, Dioscoreales and Arecales. Independent evolutionary origins of leaf dissection are indicated by phylogenetic analyses and are reflected in the diversity of mechanisms employed during leaf development. The mechanism of blastozone fractionation through localized enhancement and suppression of growth of the free margin of the leaf primordium occurs in the Araceae and Dioscoreaceae. By contrast, the corrugated, dissected leaves of palms (Arecaceae) develop through a two-step process: first, plications are formed through intercalary growth in a submarginal position and, second, the initially simple leaf blade is dissected through an abscission-like process of leaflet separation. A third mechanism, perforation formation, is employed in Monstera and five related genera of the Araceae. In this mode, discrete patches of cells undergo programmed cell death during lamina development, resulting in formation of open perforations. When perforations are positioned near the leaf margin, mechanical disruption of the thin bridges of marginal tissue results in a deeply pinnatisect blade. Whereas blastozone fractionation defines the early primary morphogenesis phase of leaf development, the other two modes occur later, during the secondary morphogenesis/histogenesis phase. Evolution of these mechanisms presumably has involved recruitment of other developmental programmes into the development of dissected leaves.  © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 150 , 25–44.     

Molecular signaling in feather morphogenesis

The development and regeneration of feathers have gained much attention recently because of progress in the following areas. First, pattern formation. The exquisite spatial arrangement provides a simple model for decoding the rules of morphogenesis. Second, stem cell biology. In every molting, a few stem cells have to rebuild the entire epithelial organ, providing much to learn on how to regenerate an organ physiologically. Third, evolution and development ('Evo-Devo'). The discovery of feathered dinosaur fossils in China prompted enthusiastic inquiries about the origin and evolution of feathers. Progress has been made in elucidating feather morphogenesis in five successive phases: macro-patterning, micro-patterning, intra-bud morphogenesis, follicle morphogenesis and regenerative cycling.