Evidence that poly(A) binding protein has an evolutionarily conserved function in facilitating mRNA biogenesis and export

Eukaryotic poly(A) binding protein (PABP) is a ubiquitous, essential cellular factor with well-characterized roles in translational initiation and mRNA turnover. In addition, there exists genetic and biochemical evidence that PABP has an important nuclear function. Expression of PABP from Arabidopsis thaliana, PAB3, rescues an otherwise lethal phenotype of the yeast pab1Delta mutant, but it neither restores the poly(A) dependent stimulation of translation, nor protects the mRNA 5' cap from premature removal. In contrast, the plant PABP partially corrects the temporal lag that occurs prior to the entry of mRNA into the decay pathway in the yeast strains lacking Pab1p. Here, we examine the nature of this lag-correction function. We show that PABP (both PAB3 and the endogenous yeast Pab1p) act on the target mRNA via physically binding to it, to effect the lag correction. Furthermore, substituting PAB3 for the yeast Pab1p caused synthetic lethality with rna15-2 and gle2-1, alleles of the genes that encode a component of the nuclear pre-mRNA cleavage factor I, and a factor associated with the nuclear pore complex, respectively. PAB3 was present physically in the nucleus in the complemented yeast strain and was able to partially restore the poly(A) tail length control during polyadenylation in vitro, in a poly(A) nuclease (PAN)-dependent manner. Importantly, PAB3 in yeast also promoted the rate of entry of mRNA into the translated pool, rescued the conditional lethality, and alleviated the mRNA export defect of the nab2-1 mutant when overexpressed. We propose that eukaryotic PABPs have an evolutionarily conserved function in facilitating mRNA biogenesis and export.     

Analysis of an essential requirement for the poly(A) binding protein function using cross-species complementation

Poly(A) binding protein (PABP) is an essential, well-conserved, multifunctional protein involved in translational initiation, mRNA biogenesis, and degradation [1--5]. We have used a cross-species complementation approach to address the nature of the essential requirement for PABP in yeast. The expression of Pab3p, a member of the Arabidopsis thaliana PABP multigene family, rescues the lethal phenotype associated with the loss of the yeast Pab1p. However, Pab3p neither protects the mRNA 5' cap from premature removal, nor does it support poly(A)-dependent translational initiation or the synergistic enhancement of translation by the poly(A) tail and 5' cap in yeast. However, Pab3p corrects the temporal lag prior to the entry of the mRNA into the degradation pathway characteristic of pab1 Delta yeast strains. Furthermore, this lag correction by Pab3p requires Pan3p, a subunit of poly(A) nuclease, an enzyme involved in the mRNA 3'-end processing. Importantly, the substitution of Pab3p for the yeast Pab1p is synthetically lethal with the PAN3 gene deletion. These results show that the function of PABP in mRNA biogenesis alone could be sufficient to support cell viability in yeast.     

The yeast poly(A)-binding protein Pab1p stimulates in vitro poly(A)-dependent and cap-dependent translation by distinct mechanisms.

Translation initiation in extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the concerted action of the cap-binding protein eIF4E and the poly(A) tail-binding protein Pab1p. These two proteins bind to translation initiation factor eIF4G and are needed for the translation of capped or polyadenylated mRNA, respectively. Together, these proteins synergistically activate the translation of a capped and polyadenylated mRNA. We have discovered that excess Pab1p also stimulates the translation of capped mRNA in extracts, a phenomenon that we define as trans-activation. Each of the above activities of Pab1p requires its second RNA recognition motif (RRM2). We have found that RRM2 from human PABP cannot substitute functionally for yeast RRM2. Using the differences between human and yeast RRM2 sequences as a guide, we have mutagenized yeast RRM2 and discovered residues that are required for eIF4G binding and poly(A)-dependent translation but not for trans-activation. Similarly, other residues within RRM2 were found to be required for trans-activation but not for eIF4G binding or poly(A)-dependent translation. These data show that Pab1p has at least two biochemically distinct activities in translation extracts.     

Molecular characterization of PAB2, a member of the multigene family coding for poly(A)-binding proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.

The poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs associates with poly(A)-binding (PAB) proteins whose role in mRNA translation and stability is being intensively investigated. Very little is known about the structure and function of the PAB genes in plants. We have cloned multiple PAB-related sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana. Results suggest that PAB proteins are encoded by a multigene family. One member of this family (PAB2) is expressed in root and shoot tissues. The complete nucleotide sequence of PAB2 was determined. Study of the predicted PAB2 protein reveals a similarity in structure among vertebrate, insect, yeast, and plant PAB proteins. All contain two highly conserved domains: an amino-terminal sequence formed by four RNA recognition motifs and an uncharacterized carboxyl-terminal region of 69 to 71 amino acids. Possible roles for the carboxyl-terminal conserved domain are discussed in view of recently published data concerning the structure and function of PAB proteins.     

Dual Interactions of the Translational Repressor Paip2 with Poly(A) Binding Protein

The cap structure and the poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs act synergistically to enhance translation. This effect is mediated by a direct interaction of eukaryotic initiation factor 4G and poly(A) binding protein (PABP), which brings about circularization of the mRNA. Of the two recently identified PABP-interacting proteins, one, Paip1, stimulates translation, and the other, Paip2, which competes with Paip1 for binding to PABP, represses translation. Here we studied the Paip2-PABP interaction. Biacore data and far-Western analysis revealed that Paip2 contains two binding sites for PABP, one encompassing a 16-amino-acid stretch located in the C terminus and a second encompassing a larger central region. PABP also contains two binding regions for Paip2, one located in the RNA recognition motif (RRM) region and the other in the carboxy-terminal region. A two-to-one stoichiometry for binding of Paip2 to PABP with two independent K(d)s of 0.66 and 74 nM was determined. Thus, our data demonstrate that PABP and Paip2 could form a trimeric complex containing one PABP molecule and two Paip2 molecules. Significantly, only the central Paip2 fragment, which binds with high affinity to the PABP RRM region, inhibits PABP binding to poly(A) RNA and translation.     

Interaction of eIF4G with poly(A)-binding protein stimulates translation and is critical for Xenopus oocyte maturation

The poly(A)-binding protein Pab1p interacts directly with the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) to facilitate translation initiation of polyadenylated mRNAs in yeast [1,2]. Although the eIF4G-PABP interaction has also been demonstrated in a mammalian system [3,4], its biological significance in vertebrates is unknown. In Xenopus oocytes, cytoplasmic polyadenylation of several mRNAs coincides with their translational activation and is critical for maturation [5-7]. Because the amount of PABP is very low in oocytes [8], it has been argued that the eIF4G-PABP interaction does not play a major role in translational activation during oocyte maturation. Also, overexpression of PABP in Xenopus oocytes has only a modest stimulatory effect on translation of polyadenylated mRNA and does not alter either the efficiency or the kinetics of progesterone-induced maturation [9]. Here, we report that the expression of an eIF4GI mutant defective in PABP binding in Xenopus oocytes reduces translation of polyadenylated mRNA and dramatically inhibits progesterone-induced maturation. Our results show that the eIF4G-PABP interaction is critical for translational control of maternal mRNAs during Xenopus development.     

Translation initiation requires the PAB-dependent poly(A) ribonuclease in yeast.

Messenger RNA translation initiation and cytoplasmic poly(A) tail shortening require the poly(A)-binding protein (PAB) in yeast. The PAB-dependent poly(A) ribonuclease (PAN) has been purified to near homogeneity from S. cerevisiae based upon its PAB requirement, and its gene has been cloned. The essential PAN1 gene encodes a 161 kd protein organized into distinct domains containing repeated sequence elements. Deletion analysis of the gene revealed that only one-third of the protein is needed to maintain cell viability. Conditional mutations in PAN1 lead to an arrest of translation initiation and alterations in mRNA poly(A) tail lengths. These data suggest that PAN could mediate each of the PAB-dependent reactions within the cell, and they provide evidence for a direct relationship between translation initiation and mRNA metabolism.     

Translational repression by a novel partner of human poly(A) binding protein, Paip2

The eukaryotic mRNA 3' poly(A) tail acts synergistically with the 5' cap structure to enhance translation. This effect is mediated by a bridging complex, composed of the poly(A) binding protein (PABP), eIF4G, and the cap binding protein, eIF4E. PABP-interacting protein 1 (Paip1) is another factor that interacts with PABP to coactivate translation. Here, we describe a novel human PABP-interacting protein (Paip2), which acts as a repressor of translation both in vitro and in vivo. Paip2 preferentially inhibits translation of a poly(A)-containing mRNA, but has no effect on the translation of hepatitis C virus mRNA, which is cap- and eIF4G-independent. Paip2 decreases the affinity of PABP for polyadenylate RNA, and disrupts the repeating structure of poly(A) ribonucleoprotein. Furthermore, Paip2 competes with Paip1 for PABP binding. Thus, Paip2 inhibits translation by interdicting PABP function.     

Overexpression of poly(A) binding protein prevents maturation-specific deadenylation and translational inactivation in Xenopus oocytes.

The translational regulation of maternal mRNAs is the primary mechanism by which stage-specific programs of protein synthesis are executed during early development. Translation of a variety of maternal mRNAs requires either the maintenance or cytoplasmic elongation of a 3' poly(A) tail. Conversely, deadenylation results in translational inactivation. Although its precise function remains to be elucidated, the highly conserved poly(A) binding protein I (PABP) mediates poly(A)-dependent events in translation initiation and mRNA stability. Xenopus oocytes contain less than one PABP per poly(A) binding site suggesting that the translation of maternal mRNAs could be either limited by or independent of PABP. In this report, we have analyzed the effects of overexpressing PABP on the regulation of mRNAs during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Increased levels of PABP prevent the maturation-specific deadenylation and translational inactivation of maternal mRNAS that lack cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements. Overexpression of PABP does not interfere with maturation-specific polyadenylation, but reduces the recruitment of some mRNAs onto polysomes. Deletion of the C-terminal basic region and a single RNP motif from PABP significantly reduces both its binding to polyadenylated RNA in vivo and its ability to prevent deadenylation. In contrast to a yeast PABP-dependent poly(A) nuclease, PABP inhibits Xenopus oocyte deadenylase in vitro. These results indicate that maturation-specific deadenylation in Xenopus oocytes is facilitated by a low level of PABP consistent with a primary function for PABP to confer poly(A) stability.     

mRNA with a <20-nt poly(A) tail imparted by the poly(A)-limiting element is translated as efficiently in vivo as long poly(A) mRNA

The poly(A)-limiting element (PLE) is a conserved sequence that restricts the length of the poly(A) tail to <20 nt. This study compared the translation of PLE-containing short poly(A) mRNA expressed in cells with translation in vitro of mRNAs with varying length poly(A) tails. In transfected cells, PLE-containing mRNA had a <20-nt poly(A) and accumulated to a level 20% higher than a matching control without a PLE. It was translated as well as the matching control mRNA with long poly(A) and showed equivalent binding to polysomes. Translation in a HeLa cell cytoplasmic extract was used to examine the impact of the PLE in the context of varying length poly(A) tails. Here the overall translation of +PLE mRNA was less than control mRNA with the same length poly(A), and the PLE did not overcome the effect of a short poly(A) tail. Because poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) is a dominant effector of poly(A)-dependent translation we reasoned excess PABP in our extract might overwhelm PLE regulation of translation. This was confirmed by experiments where PABP was inactivated with poly(rA) or Paip2, and the effect of both treatments was reversed by addition of recombinant PABP. These data indicate that the PLE functionally substitutes for bound PABP to stimulate translation of short poly(A) mRNA.     

La-related protein 4 binds poly(A), interacts with the poly(A)-binding protein MLLE domain via a variant PAM2w motif, and can promote mRNA stability

The conserved RNA binding protein La recognizes UUU-3'OH on its small nuclear RNA ligands and stabilizes them against 3'-end-mediated decay. We report that newly described La-related protein 4 (LARP4) is a factor that can bind poly(A) RNA and interact with poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Yeast two-hybrid analysis and reciprocal immunoprecipitations (IPs) from HeLa cells revealed that LARP4 interacts with RACK1, a 40S ribosome- and mRNA-associated protein. LARP4 cosediments with 40S ribosome subunits and polyribosomes, and its knockdown decreases translation. Mutagenesis of the RNA binding or PABP interaction motifs decrease LARP4 association with polysomes. Several translation and mRNA metabolism-related proteins use a PAM2 sequence containing a critical invariant phenylalanine to make direct contact with the MLLE domain of PABP, and their competition for the MLLE is thought to regulate mRNA homeostasis. Unlike all ～150 previously analyzed PAM2 sequences, LARP4 contains a variant PAM2 (PAM2w) with tryptophan in place of the phenylalanine. Binding and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies have shown that a peptide representing LARP4 PAM2w interacts with the MLLE of PABP within the affinity range measured for other PAM2 motif peptides. A cocrystal of PABC bound to LARP4 PAM2w shows tryptophan in the pocket in PABC-MLLE otherwise occupied by phenylalanine. We present evidence that LARP4 expression stimulates luciferase reporter activity by promoting mRNA stability, as shown by mRNA decay analysis of luciferase and cellular mRNAs. We propose that LARP4 activity is integrated with other PAM2 protein activities by PABP as part of mRNA homeostasis.     

Translational control by the poly(A) binding protein: a check for mRNA integrity

The eukaryotic mRNA 3' poly(A) tail and the 5' cap cooperate to synergistically enhance translation. This interaction is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein network that contains, at a minimum, the poly(A) binding protein (PABP), the capbinding protein eIF4E and a scaffolding protein, eIF4G. eIF4G, in turn, contains binding sites for eIF4A and eIF3, a 40S ribosome-associated initiation factor. The combined cooperative interactions within this "closed loop" mRNP among other effects enhance the affinity of eIF4E for the 5' cap by lowering its dissociation rate and, ultimately, facilitate the formation of 48S and 80S ribosome initiation complexes. The PABP-poly(A) interaction also stimulates initiation driven by picomavirus' internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs), a process that requires eIF4G but not eIF4E. PABP, therefore, should be considered a canonical initiation factor, integral to initiation complex formation. Poly(A)-mediated translation is subjected to regulation by the PABP-interacting proteins Paip1 and Paip2. Paip1 acts as a translational enhancer. In contrast, Paip2 strongly inhibits translation by promoting dissociation of PABP from poly(A) and by competing with eIF4G for binding to PABP.     

The poly(A) binding protein is required for poly(A) shortening and 60S ribosomal subunit-dependent translation initiation

Depletion of the essential poly(A) binding protein (PAB) in S. cerevisiae by promoter inactivation or by the utilization of a temperature-sensitive mutation (pab1-F364L) results in the inhibition of translation initiation and poly(A) tail shortening. Reversion analysis of pab1-F364L yielded seven independent, extragenic cold-sensitive mutations (spb1-spb7) that also suppress a PAB1 deletion. These mutations allow translation initiation without significantly changing poly(A) tail lengths in the absence of PAB, and they affect the amount of 60S ribosomal subunit. Consistent with this, SPB2 encodes the ribosomal protein L46. These data suggest that the 60S subunit mediates the PAB requirement of translation initiation, thereby ensuring that only intact poly(A)+ mRNA will be translated efficiently in vivo.