An analysis of partial 28S ribosomal RNA sequences suggests early radiations of sponges.

Sequences from the 5' end terminal part of 28S ribosomal RNA were obtained and compared for 22 animals belonging to all diploblastic phyla and for a large number of representatives of triploblastic Metazoa and protists. Phylogenetic analyses undertaken using different methods showed deep radiations of phyla such as Ctenophora, Cnidaria and Placozoa but also for groups of Porifera of low taxonomic rank. Short internodes between these radiations suggested an early rapid diversification of diploblasts. A long internal branch preceding the diversification of all triploblasts analyzed could be explained either by a long period with a single ancestor or by the extinction of the earliest triploblastic radiations. Finally some unexpected relationships were revealed among Porifera.     

T-box and homeobox genes from the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus: comparison of Brachyury, Tbx2/3 and Tlx in basal metazoans and bilaterians

Most animals are classified as Bilateria and only four phyla are still extant as outgroups, namely Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Ctenophora. These non-bilaterians were not considered to have a mesoderm and hence mesoderm-specific genes. However, the T-box gene Brachyury could be isolated from sponges, placozoans and cnidarians. Here, we describe the first Brachyury and a Tbx2/3 homologue from a ctenophore. In addition, analysing T-box and homeobox genes under comparable conditions in all four basal phyla lead to the discovery of novel T-box genes in sponges and cnidarians and a Tlx homeobox gene in the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus. The conservation of the T-box and the homeobox genes suggest that distinct subfamilies with different roles in bilaterians were already split in non-bilaterians.     

Dendrogramma,New Genus,with Two New Non-Bilaterian Species from the Marine Bathyal of Southeastern Australia (Animalia,Metazoa incertae sedis) – with Similarities to Some Medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara

A new genus, Dendrogramma, with two new species of multicellular, non-bilaterian, mesogleal animals with some bilateral aspects, D. enigmatica and D. discoides, are described from the south-east Australian bathyal (400 and 1000 metres depth). A new family, Dendrogrammatidae, is established for Dendrogramma. These mushroom-shaped organisms cannot be referred to either of the two phyla Ctenophora or Cnidaria at present, because they lack any specialised characters of these taxa. Resolving the phylogenetic position of Dendrogramma depends much on how the basal metazoan lineages (Ctenophora, Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria, and Bilateria) are related to each other, a question still under debate. At least Dendrogramma must have branched off before Bilateria and is possibly related to Ctenophora and/or Cnidaria. Dendrogramma, therefore, is referred to Metazoa incertae sedis. The specimens were fixed in neutral formaldehyde and stored in 80% ethanol and are not suitable for molecular analysis. We recommend, therefore, that attempts be made to secure new material for further study. Finally similarities between Dendrogramma and a group of Ediacaran (Vendian) medusoids are discussed.     

Evo-devo of non-bilaterian animals

The non-bilaterian animals comprise organisms in the phyla Porifera, Cnidaria, Ctenophora and Placozoa. These early-diverging phyla are pivotal to understanding the evolution of bilaterian animals. After the exponential increase in research in evolutionary development (evo-devo) in the last two decades, these organisms are again in the spotlight of evolutionary biology. In this work, I briefly review some aspects of the developmental biology of nonbilaterians that contribute to understanding the evolution of development and of the metazoans. The evolution of the developmental genetic toolkit, embryonic polarization, the origin of gastrulation and mesodermal cells, and the origin of neural cells are discussed. The possibility that germline and stem cell lineages have the same origin is also examined. Although a considerable number of non-bilaterian species are already being investigated, the use of species belonging to different branches of non-bilaterian lineages and functional experimentation with gene manipulation in the majority of the non-bilaterian lineages will be necessary for further progress in this field.     

Genomics of Basal metazoans

An in-depth understanding of the biology of animals will requirethe generation of genomics resources from organisms from allphyla in the metazoan phylogenetic tree. Such resources willideally include complete genome sequences and comprehensiveEST (expressed sequence tag) datasets for each species of interest.Of particular interest in this regard are animals in the earlydiverging non-bilaterian phyla Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria,and Ctenophora. Publications describing the results from theuse of genomics approaches in these phyla have only recentlybegun to appear (Kortschak et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2003;Steele et al., 2004). Issues to be considered here include choosingthe basal metazoan species to examine with genomics approaches,the relative advantages and disadvantages of genome sequencingversus EST projects, and the resources and infrastructure requiredto carry out such projects successfully.     

Molecular evidence of regression in evolution of metazoa

Molecular data permit to construct phylogenetic trees independently of morphological characters. It allows to consider their evolution without the frames of a priori hypothesis of regularities of morphological evolution and independently of palaeontological data. Cladistic analysis of elements of secondary structure of varible areas V7 and V2 in 18S rRNA with different Protozoa as "external" groups shows that Bilateria + Cnidaria are monophyletic, Ctenophora and Porifera are early derivatives of Metazoa, Trichoplax (Placozoa) is a form related to Cnidaria, while Rhombozoa, Orthonectida and Myxozoa were branched within Bilateria. Morphological reduction with losses of any organs and tissues took place many times in early evolution of Metazoa and Bilateria not only in parasitic species. It occurred both at early and late stages of embryonic development and differentiation. Two alternative scenario of morphological degeneration in Trichoplax and the way of their testing are suggested. The similarity of Ctenophora and Calcarea is discussed. Meridional or oblique position of the third cleavage furrow of ovule can be considered as an evidence of their origin from common ancestor.     

Diversification of the Metazoa: Ediacarans,colonies, and the origin of eumetazoan complexity by nested modularity

The Ediacaran biota is profoundly mysterious. There is a growing realization that these organisms should not be grouped in a single taxon, such as Petalonamae or Vendobionta, but debate continues on what the group as a whole represents. It is argued here that the Ediacarans constitute a broad, megascopic, paraphyletic grade of organization which overlaps the stem groups (and perhaps some crown groups) of the Porifera, Ctenophora, Cnidaria and Bilateria.

The modular organization of many Ediacarans suggests that they were fundamentally colonial organisms. The early disc‐shaped forms may have been solitary individuals, perhaps with a choanoflagellate or simple sponge‐like grade of organization; the modular forms may represent bud colonies of those entities. The more complex fronds, as well as other segmented and bilaterally symmetrical Ediacarans, seem to exhibit a trend toward higher levels of integration and individuation. This trend is comparable to those observed among more recent colonial organisms. Interpretation of modular Ediacarans as colonial organisms leads to a new perspective on the evolution of metazoans. It suggests that the earliest solitary Ediacarans furnished a framework for the development of cell and tissue specialization, including the formation of epithelia and complex connective tissues. Later colonial forms provided a mechanism to increase nested or hierarchical complexity, through duplication, integration, and individuation. Early acquisition of complexity had a profound impact on the subsequent evolution of metazoan body plans.

The Ediacarans seem to have evolved the range of colonial forms required to give rise to the radiation of complex bilaterians in the Cambrian. If this is true, it obviates the need to postulate the existence of the microscopic, acoelomate ancestors of basal metazoan taxa that are required by prevailing hypotheses bearing on the early evolution of the Metazoa.     

Animal phylogeny in the light of the trochaea theory

Ultrastructural similarities unite Choanoflagellata and Metazoa as the Kingdom Animalia. Mctazoa (Porifera + Placozoa + Gastraeozoa) are characterized by the presence of collagen, septate/tight junctions and spermatozoa. Porifera and Placozoa lack basal lamina, nerve cells and synapses, which characterize Gastraeozoa (Cnidaria + Trochaeozoa). Gnidaria have cnidoblasts and lack the multiciliate cells found in almost all Trochaeozoa (Gastroneuralia + Protornaeozoa). Gastroneuralia (Spiralia + Aschelminthes) have an apical brain and a pair of ventral nerves, a blastopore which becomes mouth and anus, a mouth surrounded by a downstream collecting system of compound cilia, and a mesoderm formed from the blastopore lips. Spiralia (Articulata + Parenchymia + Bryozoa) have spiral cleavage and 4d-cell mesoderm, whereas these characters are lacking in Aschelminthes, which all lack primary larvae. Protornaeozoa (Ctenophora + Notoneuralia) have mesoderm from vegetal cells. Ctenophores have colloblasts. Notoneuralia have a dorsal nervous system behind the apical area and form a new mouth surrounded by an upstream collecting system of single cilia on monociliate cells; the blastopore becomes the anus surrounded by a ring of compound cilia.
These features fit the trochaea theory, which proposes that Gastroneuralia and Notoneuralia evolved independently from the trochaea, a blastaea with the blastopore surrounded by a ring of compound cilia, which were both locomotory and particle collecting.     

The early ANTP gene repertoire: insights from the placozoan genome

The evolution of ANTP genes in the Metazoa has been the subject of conflicting hypotheses derived from full or partial gene sequences and genomic organization in higher animals. Whole genome sequences have recently filled in some crucial gaps for the basal metazoan phyla Cnidaria and Porifera. Here we analyze the complete genome of Trichoplax adhaerens, representing the basal metazoan phylum Placozoa, for its set of ANTP class genes. The Trichoplax genome encodes representatives of Hox/ParaHox-like, NKL, and extended Hox genes. This repertoire possibly mirrors the condition of a hypothetical cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor. The evolution of the cnidarian and bilaterian ANTP gene repertoires can be deduced by a limited number of cis-duplications of NKL and "extended Hox" genes and the presence of a single ancestral "ProtoHox" gene.     

Assessing the effects of a sequestered germline on interdomain lateral gene transfer in Metazoa

A sequestered germline in Metazoa has been argued to be an obstacle to lateral gene transfer (LGT), though few studies have specifically assessed this claim. Here, we test the hypothesis that the origin of a sequestered germline reduced LGT events in Bilateria (i.e., triploblast lineages) as compared to early‐diverging Metazoa (i.e., Ctenophora, Cnidaria, Porifera, and Placozoa). We analyze single‐gene phylogenies generated with over 900 species sampled from among Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryota to identify well‐supported interdomain LGTs. We focus on ancient interdomain LGT (i.e., those between prokaryotes and multiple lineages of Metazoa) as systematic errors in single‐gene tree reconstruction create uncertainties for interpreting eukaryote‐to‐eukaryote transfer. The breadth of the sampled Metazoa enables us to estimate the timing of LGTs, and to examine the pattern before versus after the evolution of a sequestered germline. We identified 58 LGTs found only in Metazoa and prokaryotes (i.e., bacteria and/or archaea), and seven genes transferred from prokaryotes into Metazoa plus one other eukaryotic clade. Our analyses indicate that more interdomain transfers occurred before the development of a sequestered germline, consistent with the hypothesis that this feature is an obstacle to LGT.     

Old trees, new trees--is there any progress?

The amount of comparative data for phylogenetic analyses is constantly increasing. Data come from different directions such as morphology, molecular genetics, developmental biology and paleontology. With the increasing diversity of data and of analytical tools, the number of competing hypotheses on phylogenetic relationships rises, too. The choice of the phylogenetic tree as a basis for the interpretation of new data is important, because different trees will support different evolutionary interpretations of the data investigated. I argue here that, although many problematic aspects exist, there are several phylogenetic relationships that are supported by the majority of analyses and may be regarded as something like a robust backbone. This accounts, for example, for the monophyly of Metazoa, Bilateria, Deuterostomia, Protostomia (= Gastroneuralia), Gnathifera, Spiralia, Trochozoa and Arthropoda and probably also for the branching order of diploblastic taxa (“Porifera”, Trichoplax adhaerens, Cnidaria and Ctenophora). Along this “backbone”, there are several problematic regions, where either monophyly is questionable and/or where taxa “rotate” in narrow regions of the tree. This is illustrated exemplified by the probable paraphyly of Porifera and the phylogenetic relationships of basal spiralian taxa. Two problems span wider regions of the tree: the position of Arthropoda either as the sister taxon of Annelida (= Articulata) or of Cycloneuralia (= Ecdysozoa) and the position of tentaculate taxa either as sister taxa of Deuterostomia (= Radialia) or within the taxon Spiralia. The backbone makes it possible to develop a basic understanding of the evolution of genes, molecules and structures in metazoan animals.     

Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi

In the past, molecular clocks have been used to estimate divergence times among animal phyla, but those time estimates have varied widely (1200-670 million years ago, Ma). In order to obtain time estimates that are more robust, we have analysed a larger number of genes for divergences among three well-represented animal phyla, and among plants, animals and fungi. The time estimate for the chordate-arthropod divergence, using 50 genes, is 993 +/- 46 Ma. Nematodes were found to have diverged from the lineage leading to arthropods and chordates at 1177 +/- 79 Ma. Phylogenetic analyses also show that a basal position of nematodes has strong support (p > 99%) and is not the result of rate biases. The three-way split (relationships unresolved) of plants, animals and fungi was estimated at 1576 +/- 88 Ma. By inference, the basal animal phyla (Porifera, Cnidaria, Ctenophora) diverged between about 1200-1500 Ma. This suggests that at least six animal phyla originated deep in the Precambrian, more than 400 million years earlier than their first appearance in the fossil record.     

Conserved intron positions in FGFR genes reflect the modular structure of FGFR and reveal stepwise addition of domains to an already complex ancestral FGFR

We have analyzed the evolution of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase genes throughout a wide range of animal phyla. No evidence for an FGFR gene was found in Porifera, but we tentatively identified an FGFR gene in the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens. The gene encodes a protein with three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single-pass transmembrane, and a split tyrosine kinase domain. By superimposing intron positions of 20 FGFR genes from Placozoa, Cnidaria, Protostomia, and Deuterostomia over the respective protein domain structure, we identified ten ancestral introns and three conserved intron groups. Our analysis shows (1) that the position of ancestral introns correlates to the modular structure of FGFRs, (2) that the acidic domain very likely evolved in the last common ancestor of triploblasts, (3) that splicing of IgIII was enabled by a triploblast-specific insertion, and (4) that IgI is subject to substantial loss or duplication particularly in quickly evolving genomes. Moreover, intron positions in the catalytic domain of FGFRs map to the borders of protein subdomains highly conserved in other serine/threonine kinases. Nevertheless, these introns were introduced in metazoan receptor tyrosine kinases exclusively. Our data support the view that protein evolution dating back to the Cambrian explosion took place in such a short time window that only subtle changes in the domain structure are detectable in extant representatives of animal phyla. We propose that the first multidomain FGFR originated in the last common ancestor of Placozoa, Cnidaria, and Bilateria. Additional domains were introduced mainly in the ancestor of triploblasts and in the Ecdysozoa.     

Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence

Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta-zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith-eliozoa (= -03non-Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno- turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha- lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.     

An even "newer" animal phylogeny

Metazoa are one of the great monophyletic groups of organisms. They comprise several major groups of organisms readily recognizable based on their anatomy. These major groups include the Bilateria (animals with bilateral symmetry), Cnidaria (jellyfish, corals and other closely related animals), Porifera (sponges), Ctenophores (comb jellies) and a phylum currently made up of a single species, the Placozoa. Attempts to systematize the relationships of these major groups as well as to determine relationships within the groups have been made for nearly two centuries. Many of the attempts have led to frustration, because of a lack of resolution between and within groups. Other attempts have led to "a new animal phylogeny". Now, a study by Dunn et al., using the expresssed sequence tag (EST) approach to obtaining high-throughput large phylogenetic matrices, presents an "even newer" animal phylogeny. There are two major aspects of this study that should be of interest to the general biological community. First, the methods used by the authors to generate their phylogenetic hypotheses call for close examination. Second, the relationships of animal taxa in their resultant trees also prompt further discussion.     

Hox, Wnt, and the evolution of the primary body axis: insights from the early-divergent phyla

   

The subkingdom Bilateria encompasses the overwhelming majority of animals, including all but four early-branching phyla: Porifera, Ctenophora, Placozoa, and Cnidaria. On average, these early-branching phyla have fewer cell types, tissues, and organs, and are considered to be significantly less specialized along their primary body axis. As such, they present an attractive outgroup from which to investigate how evolutionary changes in the genetic toolkit may have contributed to the emergence of the complex animal body plans of the Bilateria. This review offers an up-to-date glimpse of genome-scale comparisons between bilaterians and these early-diverging taxa. Specifically, we examine these data in the context of how they may explain the evolutionary development of primary body axes and axial symmetry across the Metazoa. Next, we re-evaluate the validity and evolutionary genomic relevance of the zootype hypothesis, which defines an animal by a specific spatial pattern of gene expression. Finally, we extend the hypothesis that Wnt genes may be the earliest primary body axis patterning mechanism by suggesting that Hox genes were co-opted into this patterning network prior to the last common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians.     

The occurrence of type S1A serine proteases in sponge and jellyfish

Although serine proteases are found in all kinds of cellular organisms and many viruses, the classic "chymotrypsin family" (Group S1A by the 1998 Barrett nomenclature) has an unusual phylogenetic distribution, being especially common in animals, entirely absent from plants and protists, and rare among fungi. The distribution in Bacteria is largely restricted to the genus Streptomyces, although a few isolated occurrences in other bacteria have been reported. The family may be entirely absent from Archaea. Although more than a thousand sequences have been reported for enzymes of this type from animals, none of them have been from early diverging phyla like Porifera or Cnidaria. We now report the existence of Group S1A serine proteases in a sponge (phylum Porifera) and a jellyfish (phylum Cnidaria), making it safe to conclude that all animal groups possess these enzymes.     

The Occurrence of Type S1A Serine Proteases in Sponge and Jellyfish

Although serine proteases are found in all kinds of cellular organisms and many viruses, the classic "chymotrypsin family" (Group S1A by the 1998 Barrett nomenclature) has an unusual phylogenetic distribution, being especially common in animals, entirely absent from plants and protists, and rare among fungi. The distribution in Bacteria is largely restricted to the genus Streptomyces, although a few isolated occurrences in other bacteria have been reported. The family may be entirely absent from Archaea. Although more than a thousand sequences have been reported for enzymes of this type from animals, none of them have been from early diverging phyla like Porifera or Cnidaria. We now report the existence of Group S1A serine proteases in a sponge (phylum Porifera) and a jellyfish (phylum Cnidaria), making it safe to conclude that all animal groups possess these enzymes.