Puroindoline A-gene expression is involved in association of puroindolines to starch

Puroindolines largely influence cereal grain hardness. In order to understand how they exert this influence, we carried out a molecular analysis of the pina and pinb genes of many Italian wheat cultivars. On the basis of their pin genotypes they could be divided into three groups: Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a; Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b; and Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a. Five cultivars from each group were chosen to be studied to examine the quantity of puroindolines associated with starch (friabilin) and the amount not associated with starch. In addition, the level of pina expression was measured using RT-PCR. Soft cultivars (Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a) exhibited the highest level of expression of pina; among the hard cultivars, those with the Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b genotype showed a lower level of expression, while those with the Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a genotype did not express pina. Total puroindoline and friabilin content was then measured by flow cytometry. Soft Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a cultivars displayed high puroindoline content that was primarily starch associated. Hard Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a cultivars had very low puroindoline content with no puroindoline bound to starch. Hard Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b cultivars were highly heterogeneous with respect to both the content of puroindolines and the level of association with starch. The accurate quantification of puroindolines in starch-bound and not starch-bound forms in association with molecular analysis, indicates that pina expression and presence controls the abundance of total puroindoline and its association with starch.Communicated by H.F. Linskens     

Genetic and biochemical analysis of common wheat cultivars lacking puroindoline a

Puroindoline a (Pin-a) and puroindoline b (Pin-b), two basic isoforms encoded by the Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 loci respectively, involved in controlling grain texture in wheat, were isolated from starch granules of soft wheat cultivars using three different extraction procedures, and fractionated by acidic polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (A-PAGE). Tris buffer containing 1% Triton X-114 extracted Pin-a and small amounts of Pin-b, whereas 1% SDS preferably extracted Pin-b. Large amounts of both puroindolines were isolated by a solution containing 50% propan-2-ol and 50 mM NaCl. This solution extracted reduced amounts of Pin-b and no traces of Pin-a from starch granules of 20 hard common wheats containing the null allele Pina-D1b. The absence of Pin-a was confirmed by immunostaining with an anti-Pin-a antiserum. With the exception of two cultivars, null Pin-a cultivars gave no PCR fragment with three primer pairs specific to either the coding region or the promoter region of Pina-D1a, suggesting that major changes had occurred at the Pina-D1 locus in these genotypes. Cultivars Fortuna and Glenman were unique in giving size-specific PCR fragments with all primer pairs for the allele Pina-D1a and showed a cytosine deletion at position 267 in the coding region of the Pin-a gene, which resulted in a TGA stop codon at position 361. However, there was no evidence of a mutated protein in the A-PAGE or SDS-PAGE patterns of Fortuna and Glenman. The novel gene, provisionally named Pina-D1c, is the first null allele due to a point mutation that has been identified at the Pina-D1 locus.     

Puroindolines: the molecular genetic basis of wheat grain hardness

The variation in grain hardness is the single most important trait that determines end-use quality of wheat. Grain texture classification is based primarily on either the resistance of kernels to crushing or the particle size distribution of ground grain or flour. Recently, the molecular genetic basis of grain hardness has become known, and it is the focus of this review. The puroindoline proteins a and b form the molecular basis of wheat grain hardness or texture. When both puroindolines are in their `functional' wild state, grain texture is soft. When either one of the puroindolines is absent or altered by mutation, then the result is hard texture. In the case of durum wheat which lacks puroindolines, the texture is very hard. Puroindolines represent the molecular-genetic basis of the Hardness locus on chromosome 5DS and the soft (Ha) and hard (ha) alleles present in hexaploid bread wheat varieties. To date, seven discrete hardness alleles have been described for wheat. All involve puroindoline a or b and have been designated Pina-D1b and Pinb-D1b through Pinb-D1g. A direct role of a related protein, grain softness protein (as currently defined), in wheat grain texture has yet to be demonstrated.     

Distribution of puroindoline alleles in bread wheat cultivars of the Yellow and Huai valley of China and discovery of a novel puroindoline a allele without PINA protein

Kernel hardness is one of the most important factors determining the milling and processing quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In the present study, 267 wheat cultivars and advanced lines from the Yellow and Huai Valley of China, CIMMYT, Russia and Ukraine were used for identification of SKCS (Single Kernel Characterization System) hardness and puroindoline alleles. Results indicated that Pinb-D1b is the most popular genotype in wheat cultivars from the Yellow and Huai Valley, Russia and Ukraine, whereas PINA null is a predominant genotype in wheat cultivars and advanced lines from CIMMYT. Molecular characterization of PINA-null alleles indicated that one Chinese landrace Chiyacao had the allele Pina-D1l with a single nucleotide C deletion at position 265 in Pina coding region based on sequencing results, and 35 of 39 PINA-null alleles belonged to Pina-D1b according to PCR amplification with the sequence-tagged site (STS) marker Pina-N developed previously. The remaining three cultivars (Jiangdongmen, Heshangtou and Hongquanmang from China) with PINA-null alleles were characterized at the DNA level by a primer walking strategy, and the results showed that all three cultivars with PINA-null alleles possessed a uniform 10,415-bp deletion from −5,117 bp to +5,298 bp (ATG codon references zero), designated as Pina-D1r. Correspondingly, an STS marker Pina-N2 with an expected fragment size of 436-bp spanning the 10,415-bp deletion was developed for detection of the Pina-D1r allele. This study provided a useful molecular marker for straightforward detection of one of the PINA-null alleles and would also be helpful to further understand the molecular and genetic basis of kernel hardness in bread wheat.     

Molecular Characterization of Puroindolines and their Encoding Genes in Aegilops Ventricosa

Puroindolines, the tryptophan-rich proteins controlling grain hardness in wheat, appeared as two pairs of 13 kDa polypeptides in the Acid-PAGE (A-PAGE) and two-dimensional A-PAGE×SDS-PAGE patterns of starch-granule proteins from wild allotetraploid wheat Aegilops ventricosa Tausch. (2n = 4x = 28, genomes D^vD^vN^vN^v). Puroindoline pair a1 + a2 reacted strongly with an antiserum specific for puroindoline-a from common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), whereas puroindoline pair b1 + b2 exhibited A-PAGE relative mobilities similar to that of puroindoline-b in Aegilops tauschii (Coss.), the D-genome donor to both common wheat and Ae. ventricosa. Puroindolines a2 and b1 were found to be encoded by alleles Pina-D1a and Pinb-D1h on chromosome 5D^v, respectively, whereas puroindolines a1 and b2 were assumed to be under the genetic control of chromosome 5N^v. Puroindoline a1 encoded by the novel Pina-N1a allele exhibited a high level of amino acid variation with respect to puroindoline-a. On the other hand, the tryptophan-rich region of puroindoline b2 encoded by allele Pinb-N1a showed a sequence change from lysine-42 to arginine, with no effect on the amount of protein b2 accumulated on the starch granules. A partial duplication of the pin-B gene (Pinb-relic) was identified about 1100 bp downstream from Pinb-D1 on chromosome 5D^v. The present findings are the first evidence of a tetraploid wheat species in which four puroindoline genes are expressed. The potential of Ae. ventricosa as a source of genes that may be used to modulate endosperm texture and other valuable traits in cultivated wheat species is discussed.     

A microarray analysis of wheat grain hardness

Grain hardness is an important quality characteristic of wheat grain, and considerable research effort has focused on characterising the genetic and biochemical basis underlying the hardness phenotype. Previous research has shown that the predominant difference between hard and soft seeds is linked to the puroindoline (PIN) proteins. In this study the near-isogenic lines of Heron and Falcon, which differ only in the grain hardness character, were compared using a cDNA microarray consisting of approximately 5,000 unique cDNA clones that were isolated from wheat and barley endosperm tissue. Our analysis showed that major differences in gene expression were evident for puroindoline-a (Pina), with a minor but not consistent change in the expression of puroindoline-b (Pinb). These observations were confirmed using a 16,000 unique cDNA microarray in a comparison of hard wheats with either the Pina null or Pinb mutation.     

Coexpression of the High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunit 1Ax1 and Puroindoline Improves Dough Mixing Properties in Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum)

Wheat end-use quality mainly derives from two interrelated characteristics: the compositions of gluten proteins and grain hardness. The composition of gluten proteins determines dough rheological properties and thus confers the unique viscoelastic property on dough. One group of gluten proteins, high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS), plays an important role in dough functional properties. On the other hand, grain hardness, which influences the milling process of flour, is controlled by Puroindoline a (Pina) and Puroindoline b (Pinb) genes. However, little is known about the combined effects of HMW-GS and PINs on dough functional properties. In this study, we crossed a Pina-expressing transgenic line with a 1Ax1-expressing line of durum wheat and screened out lines coexpressing 1Ax1 and Pina or lines expressing either 1Ax1 or Pina. Dough mixing analysis of these lines demonstrated that expression of 1Ax1 improved both dough strength and over-mixing tolerance, while expression of PINA detrimentally affected the dough resistance to extension. In lines coexpressing 1Ax1 and Pina, faster hydration of flour during mixing was observed possibly due to the lower water absorption and damaged starch caused by PINA expression. In addition, expression of 1Ax1 appeared to compensate the detrimental effect of PINA on dough resistance to extension. Consequently, coexpression of 1Ax1 and PINA in durum wheat had combined effects on dough mixing behaviors with a better dough strength and resistance to extension than those from lines expressing either 1Ax1 or Pina. The results in our study suggest that simultaneous modulation of dough strength and grain hardness in durum wheat could significantly improve its breadmaking quality and may not even impair its pastamaking potential. Therefore, coexpression of 1Ax1 and PINA in durum wheat has useful implications for breeding durum wheat with dual functionality (for pasta and bread) and may improve the economic values of durum wheat.     

Overexpression of Puroindoline a gene in transgenic durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) leads to a medium–hard kernel texture

Durum wheat is the second-most widely grown wheat species, and is primarily used in the production of pasta and couscous. The grain utilization of durum wheat is partly related to its very hard kernel texture because of the lack of the D genome and consequentially the Puroindoline genes. Our previous study reported the transformation of durum wheat with the Puroindoline a (Pina) gene. Here, we characterized the transgenic durum wheat lines expressing the Pina gene, and studied the effects of PINA on grain texture and other kernel characteristics. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting results demonstrated that starch-bound PINA levels of Pina-overexpressing lines were lower than that of Pina-positive control, common wheat cv. Chinese Spring, suggesting a weak association of PINA protein with starch granules in the absence of Pinb. Grain hardness analysis and flour milling tests indicated that the overexpression of PINA resulted in decreased grain hardness and increased flour yield in transgenic durum wheat lines. The agronomic performance of the transgenic and control lines was also examined and it was found that no significant differences in measured traits were observed between Pina-overexpressing and control lines in the 2-year field trials. Since grain hardness strongly affects milling and end-use qualities, the development of medium–hard-textured durum wheat lines is not only of significance for our knowledge of grain hardness and Puroindolines, but also has practical implications for plant breeders and food technologists for the expansion of utilization of durum wheat.     

Analysis of phylogenetic relations of durum,carthlicum and common wheats by means of comparison of alleles of gliadin-coding loci

Summary Polymorphism and inheritance of wheat storage protein, gliadin, of durum (macaroni) and carthlicum wheats have been studied. Analysis of gliadin in 78 cultivars and in F₂ seeds of intercultivar crosses of durum wheat revealed three different chromosome 1A-encoded blocks of components similar to those found in common wheat (GLD1A2, GLD1A18, GLD1A19). Most of the durum cultivars studied had these three blocks; GLD1A2 was also frequent in common wheat. In contrast, all chromosome 1B-encoded blocks of durum clearly differed in component composition from those found in common wheat. Therefore, durum could not be an ancestor or a derivate of recent bread wheat. Analysis of gliadin in the collection of carthlicum wheat (14 accessions) revealed several suspected chromosome 1A, 1B, and 6A-controlled blocks, some of which were similar to those in common wheat, while others were different. Therefore, carthlicum is likely to be an ancestor or a derivate of some forms of bread wheat. There were also chromosome 1A and 6A-, but not 1B-encoded blocks which were identical in durum and carthlicum wheats. The results confirm that all three wheats share the same genome A, but emphasize the heterogeneity of genotypes among donors of this genome. Discovery of identical blocks in tetraploids and hexaploids indicates polyphyletic [from different genotypes of donor (s)] origin of these wheats.     

Wheat puroindolines interact to form friabilin and control wheat grain hardness

Wheat grain is sold based upon several physiochemical characteristics, one of the most important being grain texture. Grain texture in wheat directly affects many end use qualities such as milling yield, break flour yield, and starch damage. The hardness (Ha) locus located on the short arm of chromosome 5D is known to control grain hardness in wheat. This locus contains the puroindoline A (pina) and puroindoline B (pinb) genes. All wheats to date that have mutations in pina or pinb are hard textured, while wheats possessing both the soft type pina-D1a and pinb-D1a sequences are soft. Furthermore, it has been shown that complementation of the pinb-D1b mutation in hard spring wheat can restore a soft phenotype. Here, our objective was to identify and characterize the effect the puroindoline genes have on grain texture independently and together. To accomplish this we transformed a hard red spring wheat possessing a pinb-D1b mutation with soft type pina and pinb, creating transgenic isolines that have added pina, pinb, or pina and pinb. Northern blot analysis of developing control and transgenic lines indicated that grain hardness differences were correlated with the timing of the expression of the native and transgenically added puroindoline genes. The addition of PINA decreased grain hardness less than the reduction seen with added PINB. Seeds from lines having more soft type PINB than PINA were the softest. Friabilin abundance was correlated with the presence of both soft type PINA and PINB and did not correlate well with total puroindoline abundance. The data indicates that PINA and PINB interact to form friabilin and together affect wheat grain texture.Communicated by J. Dvorak     

Expression of wild-type pinB sequence in transgenic wheat complements a hard phenotype

Wheat grain hardness is a major factor in the wheat end-product quality. Grain hardness in wheat affects such parameters as milling yield, starch damage and baking properties. A single locus determines whether wheat is hard or soft textured. This locus, termed Hardness ( Ha), resides on the short arm of chromosome 5D. Sequence alterations in the tryptophan-rich proteins puroindoline a and b (PINA and PINB) are inseparably linked to hard textured grain, but their role in endosperm texture has been controversial. Here, we show that the pinB-D1b alteration, common in hard textured wheats, can be complemented by the expression of wild-type pinB-D1a in transformed plants. Transgenic wheat seeds expressing wild-type pinB were soft in phenotype, having greatly increased friabilin levels, and greatly decreased kernel hardness and damaged starch. These results indicate that the pinB-D1b alteration is most likely the causative Ha mutation in the majority of hard wheats.     

Analysis of TaALMT1 traces the transmission of aluminum resistance in cultivated common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Allele diversities of four markers specific to intron three, exon four and promoter regions of the aluminum (Al) resistance gene of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) TaALMT1 were compared in 179 common wheat cultivars used in international wheat breeding programs. In wheat cultivars released during the last 93 years, six different promoter types were identified on the basis of allele size. A previous study showed that Al resistance was not associated with a particular coding allele for TaALMT1 but was correlated with blocks of repeated sequence upstream of the coding sequence. We verified the linkage between these promoter alleles and Al resistance in three doubled haploid and one intercross populations segregating for Al resistance. Molecular and pedigree analysis suggest that Al resistance in modern wheat germplasm is derived from several independent sources. Analysis of a population of 278 landraces and subspecies of wheat showed that most of the promoter alleles associated with Al resistance pre-existed in Europe, the Middle East and Asia prior to dispersal of cultivated germplasm around the world. Furthermore, several new promoter alleles were identified among the landraces surveyed. The TaALMT1 promoter alleles found within the spelt wheats were consistent with the hypothesis that these spelts arose on several independent occasions from hybridisations between non-free-threshing tetraploid wheats and Al-resistant hexaploid bread wheats. The strong correlation between Al resistance and Al-stimulated malate efflux from the root apices of 49 diverse wheat genotypes examined was consistent with the previous finding that Al resistance in wheat is conditioned primarily by malate efflux. These results demonstrate that the markers based on intron, exon and promoter regions of TaALMT1 can trace the inheritance of the Al resistance locus within wheat pedigrees and track Al resistance in breeding programmes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Physical mapping of <Emphasis Type="Italic">puroindoline b</Emphasis>-<Emphasis Type="Italic">2</Emphasis> genes and molecular characterization of a novel variant in durum wheat (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Triticum turgidum</Emphasis> L.)

The puroindoline genes (Pina and Pinb) are the functional components of the common or bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain hardness locus that are responsible for kernel texture. In this study, four puroindoline b-2 variants were physically mapped using nulli-tetrosomic lines of bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring and substitution lines of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) cultivar Langdon. Results indicated that Pinb-2v1 was on 7D of Chinese Spring, Pinb-2v2 on 7B of Chinese Spring, Pinb-2v3 on 7B of Chinese Spring and Langdon, and Pinb-2v4 on 7A of Chinese Spring and Langdon. A new puroindoline b-2 variant, designated Pinb-2v5, was identified at the puroindoline b-2 locus of durum wheat cultivar Langdon, with a difference of only five single nucelotide polymorphisms compared with Pinb-2v4. Sequencing results indicated that, in comparison with the Pinb-2v3 sequence (AM99733 and GQ496618 with one base-pair modification of G to T at 6th position, designated Pinb-2v3a) in bread wheat cultivar Witchta, the coding region of Pinb-2v3 in 12 durum wheat cultivars had a single nucleotide change from T to C at the 311th position, resulting in a corresponding amino acid change from valine to alanine at the 104th position. This new allele was designated Pinb-2v3b. The study of puroindoline b-2 gene polymorphism in CIMMYT and Italian durum wheat germplasm and discovery of a novel puroindoline b-2 variant could provide useful information for further understanding the molecular and genetic basis of kernel hardness and illustrating gene duplication events in wheat.     

Strong presence of the high grain protein content allele of NAM-B1 in Fennoscandian wheat

Grain protein content in wheat has been shown to be affected by the NAM-B1 gene where the wildtype allele confers high levels of protein and micronutrients but can reduce yield. Two known non-functional alleles instead increase yield but lead to lower levels of protein and micronutrients. The wildtype allele in hexaploid bread wheat is so far mainly known from historical specimens and a few lines with an emmer wheat introgression. Here we report a screening for the wildtype allele in wheats of different origin. First, a worldwide core collection of 367 bread wheats with worldwide origin was screened and five accessions carrying the wildtype NAM-B1 allele were found. Several of these could be traced to a Fennoscandian origin and the wildtype allele was more frequent in spring wheat. These findings, together with the late maturation of spring wheat, suggested that the faster maturation caused by the wildtype allele might have preserved it in areas with a short growing season. Thus a second set consisting of 138 spring wheats of a northern origin was screened and as many as 33?% of the accessions had the wildtype allele, all of a Fennoscandian origin. The presence of the wildtype allele in landraces and cultivars is in agreement with the use of landraces in Fennoscandian wheat breeding. Last, 22 spelt wheats, a wheat type previously suggested to carry the wildtype allele, were screened and five wildtype accessions found. The wildtype NAM-B1 accessions found could be a suitable material for plant breeding efforts directed towards increasing the nutrient content of bread wheat.     

A leucine to proline mutation in puroindoline b is frequently present in hard wheats from Northern Europe

Endosperm hardness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is determined by one major genetic factor, the Hardness (Ha) gene on the short arm of chromosome 5D. Grain hardness has previously been reported to result from either a failure to express puroindoline a (Pina–D1b) or a glycine to serine mutation at position 46 in puroindoline b (Pinb–D1b). In this study, which involves a large survey of 343 wheat genotypes of mostly Northern European origin, we report two new mutations in puroindoline b associated with hard endosperm. These were characterized as involving a leucine to proline change at position 60 (Pinb–D1c), and a tryptophan to arginine change at position 44 (Pinb–D1d), respectively. While the former seems to be widely distributed in germplasm around the world, the latter was only found in three winter wheats from Sweden and Netherlands. As discussed in the paper, the three known mutations in puroindoline b can be considered ”loss-of-function” mutations (i.e. soft to hard), and structural analysis may serve to predict that their dramatic effect on wheat grain texture is a result of reduced lipid–binding ability. Received: 10 June 1999 / Accepted: 21 September 1999     

The determinants of grain texture in cereals

Kernel hardness is an important agronomic trait that influences end-product properties. In wheat cultivars, this trait is determined by thePuroindoline a (Pina) andPuroindoline b (Pinb) genes, located in theHardness locus (Ha) on chromosome 5DS of the D genome. Wild type alleles code puroindoline a (PINA) and puroindoline b (PINB) proteins, which form a 15-kDa friabilin present on the surface of water-washed starch granules. Both the proteins are accumulated in the starch endosperm cells and aleurone of the mature kernels.Puroindoline-like genes coding puroindoline-like proteins in the starch endosperm occur in some of the genomes of Triticeae and Aveneae cereals. Orthologs are present in barley, rye and oats. However, some genomes of these diploid and polyploid cereals, like that ofTriticum turgidum var.durum (AABB) lack thepuroindoline genes, having a very hard kernel texture. The two wild type alleles in opposition (dominant loci) control the soft pheno-type. Mutation either inPina orPinb or in both leads to a medium-hard or hard kernel texture. The most frequent types ofPin mutations are point mutations within the coding sequence resulting in the substitution of a single amino acid or a null allele. The latter is the result of a frame shift determined by base deletion or insertion or a one-point mutation to the stop codon. The lipid-binding properties of the puroindolines affect not only the dough quality but also the plants’ resistance to pathogens. Genetic modification of cereals withPuroindoline genes and/or their promoters enable more detailed functional analyses and the production of plants with the desired characteristics.     

Expression of puroindoline a enhances leaf rust resistance in transgenic tetraploid wheat

The purouindoline gene (pin) coding for puroindoline proteins (PINs) is located on chromosome 5D, controls grain hardness, and the PINs have in vitro antimicrobial activity against gram-positive (G+) bacteria, gram-negative (G-) bacteria and fungi. Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina is one of the most important fungal diseases for common wheat with AABBDD genomes. Tetraploid wheat (AABB genome) varieties Luna and Venusia were transformed with the purouindoline a (pinA) gene by bombardment, express PINA consititutively. Transgenic plants showed enhanced response to leaf rust in greenhouse and field. Comparative study of harvesting parameters showed significant differences between transgenic and control plants. These indexes were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in control plants than that in transgenic plants, which suggests that they are significantly affected by pinA gene and that the puroindoline a protein (PINA) can effectively inhibit in vivo the growth of fungal, and the transgenic tetraploid wheat can grow well in Hubei Province, Central China, where the tetraploid wheat varieties Luna and Venusia have poor yield due to their disease-sensitivity.     

The ectopic expression of the wheat Puroindoline genes increase germ size and seed oil content in transgenic corn

Plant oil content and composition improvement is a major goal of plant breeding and biotechnology. The Puroindoline a and b (PINA and PINB) proteins together control whether wheat seeds are soft or hard textured and share a similar structure to that of plant non-specific lipid-transfer proteins. Here we transformed corn (Zea mays L.) with the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) puroindoline genes (Pina and Pinb) to assess their effects upon seed oil content and quality. Pina and Pinb coding sequences were introduced into corn under the control of a corn Ubiquitin promoter. Three Pina/Pinb expression positive transgenic events were evaluated over two growing seasons. The results showed that Pin expression increased germ size significantly without negatively impacting seed size. Germ yield increased 33.8% while total seed oil content was increased by 25.23%. Seed oil content increases were primarily the result of increased germ size. This work indicates that higher oil content corn hybrids having increased food or feed value could be produced via puroindoline expression.     

The Wheat Puroindoline Genes Confer Fungal Resistance in Transgenic Corn

Puroindoline a and b (Pina and Pinb), together make up the functional components of the wheat grain hardness locus (Ha) and have antimicrobial properties. The antifungal activity of puroindoline proteins, PINA and PINB, has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. In this study, Pina and Pinb were introduced into corn under the control of a corn Ubiquitin promoter. Two Pina/Pinb expression–positive transgenic events were evaluated for resistance to Cochliobolus heterostrophus, the corn southern leaf blight (SLB) pathogen. Transgenic corn expressing Pins showed significantly increased tolerance to C. heterostrophus, averaging 42.1% reduction in symptoms. Pins are effective in vivo as antifungal proteins and could be valuable tools in corn SLB control.     

Molecular genetics of puroindolines and related genes: allelic diversity in wheat and other grasses

The hardness or texture of cereal grains is a primary determinant of their technological and processing quality. Among members of the Triticeae, most notably wheat, much of the variation in texture is controlled by a single locus comprised of the Puroindoline a, Puroindoline b and Grain Softness Protein-1 (Gsp-1) genes. Puroindolines confer the three major texture classes of soft and hard common wheat and the very hard durum wheat. The protein products of these genes interact with lipids and are associated with the surface of isolated starch (as a protein fraction known as ‘friabilin’). During the past ten years a great diversity of alleles of both Puroindoline genes have been discovered and significant advances made in understanding the relationship between the gene presence/absence, sequence polymorphism and texture of cereal grains. Efforts have also focussed on Puroindoline and Gsp-1 genes in diploid progenitors, other Triticeae grasses and synthetic wheats in order to understand the evolution of this gene family and find potentially useful variants. The puroindoline homologues in other cereals such as rye and barley are also receiving attention. This work summarises new developments in molecular genetics of puroindolines in wheat and related Triticeae grasses, and the related genes in other cereals.