Quantitative comparative mutagenesis in bacteria, mammalian cells, and animal-mediated assays A convenient way of estimating genotoxic activity in vivo?

The accumulation of environmental compounds which exhibit genotoxic properties in short-term assays and the increasing lag of time for obtaining confirmation or not in long-term animal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity tests, makes it necessary to develop alternative, rapid methodologies for estimating genotoxic activity in vivo. In the experimental approach used here, it was assumed that the genotoxic activity of foreign compounds in animals, and ultimately humans, is determined among others by exposure level, organ distribution of (DNA) dose, and genotoxic potency per unit of dose, and that knowledge about these 3 parameters may allow to rapidly determine the expected degree of genotoxicity in various organs of exposed animals. In view of the high degree of qualitative correlation between mutagenic activity of chemicals in bacteria and in cultured mammalian cells, and their mutagenic and carcinogenic properties in animals, and in order to be able to distinguish whether mutagenic potency differences were due to differences in (DNA) dose rather than other physiological factors, the results of mutagenicity tests obtained in the present experiments using bacteria and mammalian cells were compared on the basis of DNA dose rather than exposure concentrations, with the following questions in mind: Is there an absolute or a relative correlation between the mutagenic potencies of various ethylating agents in bacteria (E. coli K12) and in mammalian cells (V79 Chinese hamster) after treatment in standardized experiments, and can specific DNA adducts be made responsible for mutagenicity? Is the order of mutagenic potency of various ethylating agents observed in bacteria in vitro representative of the ranking of mutagenic potency found in vivo? Since the answer to this last question was negative, a further question addressed to was whether short-term in vivo assays could be developed for a rapid determination of the presence (and persistence) of genotoxic factors in various organs of mice treated with chemicals. In quantitative comparative mutagenesis experiments using E. coli K12 and Chinese hamster cells treated under standardized conditions in vitro with 5 ethylating agents, there was no indication of an absolute correlation between the number of induced mutants per unit of dose in the bacteria and the mammalian cells. The ranking of mutagenic potency was, however, identical in bacteria and mammalian cells, namely, ENNG greater than ENU greater than or equal to DES greater than DEN congruent to EMS, the mutagenic activity of DEN being dependent on the presence of mammalian liver preparations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents

In the past years, several methodologies were developed for potency ranking of genotoxic carcinogens and germ cell mutagens. In this paper, we analyzed six sub-classes of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) binding antineoplastic drugs comprising a total of 37 chemicals and, in addition, four alkyl-epoxides, using four approaches for the ranking of genotoxic agents on a potency scale: the EPA/IARC genetic activity profile (GAP) database, the ICPEMC agent score system, and the analysis of qualitative and quantitative structure-activity and activity-activity relationships (SARs, AARs) between types of DNA modifications and genotoxic endpoints. Considerations of SARs and AARs focused entirely on in vivo data for mutagenicity in male germ cells (mouse, Drosophila), carcinogenicity (TD₅₀s) and acute toxicity (LD₅₀s) in rodents, whereas the former two approaches combined the entire database on in vivo and in vitro mutagenicity tests. The analysis shows that the understanding and prediction of rank positions of individual genotoxic agents requires information on their mechanism of action. Based on SARs and AARs, the covalent DNA binding antineoplastic drugs can be divided into three categories. Category 1 comprises mono-functional alkylating agents that primarily react with N7 and N3 moieties of purines in DNA. Efficient DNA repair is the major protective mechanism for their low and often not measurable genotoxic effects in repair-competent germ cells, and the need of high exposure doses for tumor induction in rodents. Due to cell type related differences in the efficiency of DNA repair, a strong target cell specificity in various species regarding the potency of these agents for adverse effects is found. Three of the four evaluation systems rank category 1 agents lower than those of the other two categories. Category 2 type mutagens produce O-alkyl adducts in DNA in addition to N-alkyl adducts. In general, certain O-alkyl DNA adducts appear to be slowly repaired, or even not at all, which make this kind of agents potent carcinogens and germ cell mutagens. Especially the inefficient repair of O-alkyl—pyrimidines causes the high mutational response of cells to these agents. Agents of this category give high potency scores in all four expert systems. The major determinant for the high rank positions on any scale of genotoxic of category 3 agents is their ability to induce primarily structural chromosomal changes. These agents are able to cross-link DNA. Their high intrinsic genotoxic potency appears to be related to the number of DNA cross-links per target dose unit they can induce. A confounding factor among category 3 agents is that often the genotoxic endpoints occur closed to or toxic levels, and that the width of the mutagenic dose range, i.e., the dose area between the lowest observed effect level and the LD₅₀, is smaller (usually no more than 1 logarithmic unit) than for chemicals of the other two categories. For all three categories of genotoxic agents, strong correlations are observed between their carcinogenic potency, acute toxicity and germ cell specificity.     

Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph series.

To determine whether genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens contribute similarly to the cancer burden in humans, an analysis was performed on agents that were evaluated in Supplements 6 and 7 to the IARC Monographs for their carcinogenic effects in humans and animals and for the activity in short-term genotoxicity tests. The prevalence of genotoxic carcinogens on four groups of agents, consisting of established human carcinogens (group 1, n = 30), probable human carcinogens (group 2A, n = 37), possible human carcinogens (group 2B, n = 113) and on agents with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals (a subset of group 3, n = 149) was determined. A high prevalence in the order of 80 to 90% of genotoxic carcinogens was found in each of the groups 1, 2A and 2B, which were also shown to be multi-species/multi-tissues carcinogens. The distribution of carcinogenic potency in rodents did not reveal any specific characteristic of the human carcinogens in group 1 that would differentiate them from agents in groups 2A, 2B and 3. The results of this analysis indicate that (a) an agent with unknown carcinogenic potential showing sufficient evidence of activity in in vitro/in vivo genotoxicity assays (involving as endpoints DNA damage and chromosomal/mutational damage) may represent a hazard to humans; and b) an agent showing lack of activity in this spectrum of genotoxicity assays should undergo evaluation for carcinogenicity by rodent bioassay, in view of the present lack of validated short-term tests for non-genotoxic carcinogens. Overall, this analysis implies that genotoxic carcinogens add more to the cancer burden in man than non-genotoxic carcinogens. Thus, identification of such genotoxic carcinogens and subsequent lowering of exposure will remain the main goal for primary cancer prevention in man.     

Endogenous genotoxic agents and processes as a basis of spontaneous carcinogenesis

A list of endogenous DNA-damaging agents and processes is given. Endogenous electrophiles are found with the cosubstrates of physiological transfer reactions (S-adenosylmethionine for methylation, ATP for phosphorylation, NAD+ for ADP-ribosylation, acetyl CoA for acetylation). Aldehyde groups (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, formaldehyde, open forms of reducing sugars, degradation products of peroxidation) or alkylating degradation products derived from endogenous nitroso compounds represent additional possibilities. Radical-forming reactions include leakage of the superoxide anion radical from terminal cytochromes and redox cycles, hydroxyl radical formation by the Fenton reaction from endogenous hydrogen peroxide, and the formation of lipid peroxides. Genetic instability by spontaneous deaminations and depurinations as well as replicative instability by tautomer errors and in the presence of mutagenic metal ions represent a third important class of endogenous genotoxic processes. The postulated endogenous genotoxicity could form the mechanistic basis for what is called 'spontaneous' tumor incidence and explain the possibility of an increased tumor incidence after treatment of animals with non-genotoxic compounds exhibiting tumor-promoting activity only. Individual differences are expected to be seen also with endogenous DNA damage. The presence of endogenous DNA damage implies that exogenous DNA-carcinogen adducts give rise to an incremental damage which is expected to be proportional to the carcinogen dose at lowest levels. An increased tumor risk due to exposure to exogenous genotoxic carcinogens could therefore be assessed in terms of the background DNA damage, for instance in multiples of the mean level or of the interindividual variability in a population.     

Molecular mechanisms of adaptive response to alkylating agents in Escherichia coli and some remarks on O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase in other organisms

Alkylating agents are environmental genotoxic agents with mutagenic and carcinogenic potential, however, their properties are also exploited in the treatment of malignant diseases. O(6)-Methylguanine is an important adduct formed by methylating agents that, if not repaired, can lead to mutations and death. Its repair is carried out by O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MTase) in an unique reaction in which methyl groups are transferred to the cysteine acceptor site of the protein itself. Exposure of Escherichia coli cells to sublethal concentrations of methylating agents triggers the expression of a set of genes, which allows the cells to tolerate DNA lesions, and this kind of inducible repair is called the adaptive response. The MTase of E. coli, encoded by the ada gene was the first MTase to be discovered and one of best characterised. Its repair and regulatory mechanisms are understood in considerable detail and this bacterial protein played a key role in identification of its counterparts in other living organisms. This review summarises the nature of alkylation damage in DNA and our current knowledge about the adaptive response in E. coli. I also include a brief mention of MTases from other organisms with the emphasis on the human MTase, which could play a crucial role in both cancer prevention and cancer treatment.     

Evaluation of the DNA-repair host-mediated assay. I. Induction of repairable DNA damage in E. coli cells recovered from liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and the blood stream of mice treated with methylating carcinogens

The DNA-repair host-mediated assay was further calibrated by determining the genotoxic activities of 4 methylating carcinogens, namely, dimethylnitrosamine (DMNA), 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (SDMH), methyl nitrosourea (MNU) and methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) in various organs of treated mice. The ranking of the animal-mediated genotoxic activities of the compounds was compared with that obtained in DNA repair assays performed in vitro. The differential survival of strain E. coli K-12/343/113 and of its DNA-repair-deficient derivatives recA, polA and uvrB/recA, served as a measure of genotoxic potency. In the in vitro assays and at equimolar exposure concentrations, MMS and MNU are the most active chemicals, followed by DMNA, which shows a slight genotoxic effect only in the presence of mouse liver homogenate; SDMH has no activity under these conditions. In the host-mediated assays, the order of genotoxic potency of the compounds was quite different: those carcinogens which require mammalian metabolic activation, namely, DMNA and SDMH, show strong effects in liver and blood, a lesser effect in the lungs and kidneys and the least effect in the spleen. The activity of MNU, a directly acting compound, is similar in all organs investigated, but it is clearly lower than that of DMNA and SDMH. MMS, also a directly acting carcinogen, causes some (barely significant) effect at the highest dose tested. A similar order of potency was observed when the compounds were tested in intrasanguineous host-mediated assays with gene mutation as an endpoint. DMNA and SDMH induce comparable frequencies of L-valine-resistant mutants in E. coli K-12/343/113 recovered from liver and spleen of treated mice, the effect in the liver being the strongest. MNU is mutagenic only at a higher dose, while MMS shows no effect. The results are discussed with respect to the literature data on organ-specific DNA adduct formation induced by the compounds. It is concluded that qualitatively there is a good correlation between the degree of genotoxic activity found in the DNA repair host-mediated assay and DNA adduct formation in the animal's own cells. This is exemplified by the finding that the relative order of genotoxic activity of the 4 methylating agents in bacteria recovered from various organs (DMNA approximately equal to SDMH greater than MNU greater than MMS) is reflected by the same order of magnitude in DNA alkylation in corresponding mammalian organs. Quantitatively, the indirectly acting agents DMNA and SDMH seem to induce fewer genotoxic effects in bacteria present in the liver than would be expected on the basis of DNA-adduct formation data.     

Reaction-kinetic parameters of glycidamide as determinants of mutagenic potency

Values for reaction-kinetic parameters of electrophiles can be used to predict mutagenic potency. One approach employs the Swain-Scott relationship for comparative kinetic studies of electrophilic agents reacting with nucleophiles. In this way glycidamide (GA), the putatively mutagenic/carcinogenic metabolite of acrylamide, was assessed by determining the rates of reaction with different nucleophiles. The rate constants (kNu) were determined using the "supernucleophile" cob(I)alamin [Cbl(I)] as an analytical tool. The Swain-Scott parameters for GA were compared with those of ethylene oxide (EO). The substrate constants, s values, for GA and for EO were found to be 1.0 and 0.93, respectively. The reaction rates at low values of nucleophilic strength (n=1-3), corresponding to oxygens in DNA, were determined to be 2-3.5 times higher for GA compared to EO. GA was also more reactive than EO towards other nucleophiles (n=0-6.4). The mutagenic potency of GA was determined in Chinese hamster ovary cells (hprt mutations in CHO-AA8 cells per dose unit with gamma-radiation as reference standard). The potency of GA was estimated to be about three mutations per 10(5) cells and mMh corresponding to about 40 rad-equ./mMh. A preliminary comparison of the mutagenic potency (per mMh and as rad-equivalents) of GA and EO shows an approximately seven times higher potency for GA. A higher mutagenic potency of GA compared to EO is compatible with expectation from reaction-kinetic data of the two compounds. The data confirmed that GA is not a strong mutagen, which is in line with what is expected for simple oxiranes. The present study shows the value of cob(I)alamin for the determination of reaction-kinetic parameters and their use for prediction of mutagenic potency.     

DNA damage by mycotoxins

Mycotoxins are toxic fungal metabolites which are structurally diverse, common contaminants of the ingredients of animal feed and human food. To date, mycotoxins with carcinogenic potency in experimental animal models include aflatoxins, sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin, fumonisins, zearalenone, and some Penicillium toxins. Most of these carcinogenic mycotoxins are genotoxic agents with the exception of fumonisins, which is currently believed to act by disrupting the signal transduction pathways of the target cells. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), a category I known human carcinogen and the most potent genotoxic agent, is mutagenic in many model systems and produces chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, sister chromatid exchange, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and chromosomal strand breaks, as well as forms adducts in rodent and human cells. The predominant AFB1-DNA adduct was identified as 8, 9-dihydro-8-(N7-guanyl)-9-hydroxy-AFB1 (AFB1-N7-Gua), which derives from covalent bond formation between C8 of AFB1-8,9-epoxides and N7 of guanine bases in DNA. Initial AFB1-N7-guanine adduct can convert to a ring-opened formamidopyrimidine derivative, AFB1-FAPY. The formation of AFB1-N7-guanine adduct was linear over the low-dose range in all species examined, and liver, the primary target organ, had the highest level of the adduct. Formation of initial AFB1-N7-guanine adduct was correlated with the incidence of hepatic tumor in trout and rats. The AFB1-N7-guanine adduct was removed from DNA rapidly and was excreted exclusively in urine of exposed rats. Several human studies have validated the similar correlation between dietary exposure to AFB1 and excretion of AFB1-N7-guanine in urine. Replication of DNA containing AFB1-N7-guanine adduct-induced G-->T mutations in an experimental model. Activation of ras protooncogene has been found in AFB1-induced tumors in mouse, rat, and fish. More strikingly, the relationship between aflatoxin exposure and development of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HHC) was demonstrated by the studies on the p53 tumor suppressor gene. High frequency of p53 mutations (G-->T transversion at codon 249) was found to occur in HHC collected from populations exposed to high levels of dietary aflatoxin in China and Southern Africa. Furthermore, AFB1-induced DNA damage and hepatocarcinogenesis in experimental models can be modulated by a variety of factors including nutrients, chemopreventive agents, and other factors such as food restriction and viral infection, as well as genetic polymorphisms.     

The nuclear guanine nucleotide exchange factors Ect2 and Net1 regulate RhoB-mediated cell death after DNA damage

Commonly used antitumor treatments, including radiation and chemotherapy, function by damaging the DNA of rapidly proliferating cells. However, resistance to these agents is a predominant clinical problem. A member of the Rho family of small GTPases, RhoB has been shown to be integral in mediating cell death after ionizing radiation (IR) or other DNA damaging agents in Ras-transformed cell lines. In addition, RhoB protein expression increases after genotoxic stress, and loss of RhoB expression causes radio- and chemotherapeutic resistance. However, the signaling pathways that govern RhoB-induced cell death after DNA damage remain enigmatic. Here, we show that RhoB activity increases in human breast and cervical cancer cell lines after treatment with DNA damaging agents. Furthermore, RhoB activity is necessary for DNA damage-induced cell death, as the stable loss of RhoB protein expression using shRNA partially protects cells and prevents the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and the induction of the pro-apoptotic protein Bim after IR. The increase in RhoB activity after genotoxic stress is associated with increased activity of the nuclear guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), Ect2 and Net1, but not the cytoplasmic GEFs p115 RhoGEF or Vav2. Importantly, loss of Ect2 and Net1 via siRNA-mediated protein knock-down inhibited IR-induced increases in RhoB activity, reduced apoptotic signaling events, and protected cells from IR-induced cell death. Collectively, these data suggest a mechanism involving the nuclear GEFs Ect2 and Net1 for activating RhoB after genotoxic stress, thereby facilitating cell death after treatment with DNA damaging agents.     

Polymorphisms in DNA repair and environmental interactions

The repair of damage to DNA is critical to the survival of a cell. However, not all organisms nor all individuals express a similar response to challenges to their genetic material. Numerous polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA repair have been found in individuals with DNA repair-related disease as well as in the general population. Studies of these variants are critical in understanding the response of the cell to DNA damage. In some cases, these changes predispose the carrier to a greatly increased risk of cancer. In other cases, the effects are subtler and depend on interactions between the alleles of several genes, or with environmental factors. Consequently, the health effects of exposure to genotoxic or carcinogenic compounds or agents can depend on the variations in these genes. This review will highlight some of the effects that variants, found in many of the genes involved in human DNA repair pathways, have on the response to damage, and their role in susceptibility of the cell and organism to environmental genotoxins. This review will concentrate on the mismatch repair, nucleotide repair, base excision repair, strand break repair, and direct alkyl repair pathways.     

Mechanisms of DNA damage repair in adult stem cells and implications for cancer formation

Maintenance of genomic integrity in tissue-specific stem cells is critical for tissue homeostasis and the prevention of deleterious diseases such as cancer. Stem cells are subject to DNA damage induced by endogenous replication mishaps or exposure to exogenous agents. The type of DNA lesion and the cell cycle stage will invoke different DNA repair mechanisms depending on the intrinsic DNA repair machinery of a cell. Inappropriate DNA repair in stem cells can lead to cell death, or to the formation and accumulation of genetic alterations that can be transmitted to daughter cells and so is linked to cancer formation. DNA mutational signatures that are associated with DNA repair deficiencies or exposure to carcinogenic agents have been described in cancer. Here we review the most recent findings on DNA repair pathways activated in epithelial tissue stem and progenitor cells and their implications for cancer mutational signatures. We discuss how deep knowledge of early molecular events leading to carcinogenesis provides insights into DNA repair mechanisms operating in tumours and how these could be exploited therapeutically.     

Evaluation of fecal mutagenicity and colorectal cancer risk

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common internal malignancies in Western society. The cause of this disease appears to be multifactorial and involves genetic as well as environmental aspects. The human colon is continuously exposed to a complex mixture of compounds, which is either of direct dietary origin or the result of digestive, microbial and excretory processes. In order to establish the mutagenic burden of the colorectal mucosa, analysis of specific compounds in feces is usually preferred. Alternatively, the mutagenic potency of fecal extracts has been determined, but the interpretation of these more integrative measurements is hampered by methodological shortcomings. In this review, we focus on exposure of the large bowel to five different classes of fecal mutagens that have previously been related to colorectal cancer risk. These include heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCA) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), two exogenous factors that are predominantly ingested as pyrolysis products present in food and (partially) excreted in the feces. Additionally, we discuss N-nitroso-compounds, fecapentaenes and bile acids, all fecal constituents (mainly) of endogenous origin. The mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of the above mentioned compounds as well as their presence in feces, proposed mode of action and potential role in the initiation and promotion of human colorectal cancer are discussed. The combined results from in vitro and in vivo research unequivocally demonstrate that these classes of compounds comprise potent mutagens that induce many different forms of genetic damage and that particularly bile acids and fecapentaenes may also affect the carcinogenic process by epigenetic mechanisms. Large inter-individual differences in levels of exposures have been reported, including those in a range where considerable genetic damage can be expected based on evidence from animal studies. Particularly, however, exposure profiles of PAH and N-nitroso compounds (NOC) have to be more accurately established to come to a risk evaluation. Moreover, lack of human studies and inconsistency between epidemiological data make it impossible to describe colorectal cancer risk as a result of specific exposures in quantitative terms, or even to indicate the relative importance of the mutagens discussed. Particularly, the polymorphisms of genes involved in the metabolism of heterocyclic amines are important determinants of carcinogenic risk. However, the present knowledge of gene-environment interactions with regard to colorectal cancer risk is rather limited. We expect that the introduction of DNA chip technology in colorectal cancer epidemiology will offer new opportunities to identify combinations of exposures and genetic polymorphisms that relate to increased cancer risk. This knowledge will enable us to improve epidemiological study design and statistical power in future research.     

A genotoxic screen: rapid analysis of cellular dose-response to a wide range of agents that either damage DNA or alter genome maintenance pathways

SNP analysis has come to the forefront of genomics since the mouse and human genomes have been sequenced. High throughput functional screens are necessary to evaluate these sequence databases. Described here is a genotoxic screen: a rapid method that determines the cellular dose-response to a wide range of agents that either damage DNA or alter basic cellular pathways important for maintaining genomic integrity. Importantly, a single person utilizing standard tissue culture equipment may perform these assays composed of 20 agents that attack genomic integrity or maintenance at many different levels. Thus, a small lab may perform this screen to determine the integrity of a wide range of DNA repair, chromatin metabolism, and response pathways without the limitations of investigator bias. A genotoxic screen will be useful when analyzing cells with either known genetic alterations (generated directly by the investigator or derived from individuals with known mutations) or unknown genetic alterations (cells with spontaneous mutations such as cancer-derived cells). Screening many genotoxins at one time will aid in determining the biological importance of these altered genes. Here we show the dose-response curves of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and HeLa cells exposed to 20 genotoxic agents. ES cells were chosen since they are amenable to genetic alteration by the investigator. HeLa cells were chosen since they were derived from cancer and are commonly used. Comparing the dose-response curves of these two cell lines show their relative sensitivity to these agents and helps define their genotoxic profile. As a part of phenomics, a large genotoxic profile database for cancer-derived cells, when integrated with other databases such as expression profiles and comparative genomic hybridization, may aid in maximizing the effectiveness of developing anti-cancer protocols.     

Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity of acrylonitrile.

Acrylonitrile (AN) is an important intermediary for the synthesis of a variety of organic products, such as artificial fibres, household articles and resins. Although acute effects are the primary concern for an exposure to AN, potential genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic risks of AN have to be taken seriously in view of the large number of workers employed in such industries and the world-wide population using products containing and possibly liberating AN. An understanding of the effect of acrylonitrile must be based on a characterization of its metabolism as well as of the resulting products and their genotoxic properties. Tests for mutagenicity in bacteria have in general been positive, those in plants and on unscheduled DNA synthesis doubtful, and those on chromosome aberrations in vivo negative. Wherever positive results had been obtained, metabolic activation of AN appeared to be a prerequisite. The extent to which such mutagenic effects are significant in man depends, however, also on the conditions of exposure. It appears from the limited data that the ultimate mutagenic factor(s), such as 2-cyanoethylene oxide, may have little opportunity to act under conditions where people are exposed because it is formed only in small amounts and is rapidly degraded. The carcinogenic action of AN has been evaluated by various agencies and ranged from 'reasonably be anticipated to be a human carcinogen' to 'cannot be excluded', the most recent evaluation being 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'. Animal data that confirm the carcinogenic potential of AN have certain limitations with respect to the choice of species, type of tumors and length of follow up. Epidemiological studies which sometimes, but not always, yielded positive results, encounter the usual difficulties of confounding factors in chemical industries. Exposure of workers to AN should continue to be carefully monitored, but AN would not have to be considered a cancer risk to the population provided limitations on releases from consumer products and guidelines on AN in water and air are enforced. AN is teratogenic in laboratory animals (rat, hamster) at high doses when foetal/embryonic (and maternal) toxicity already is manifest. Pregnant workers should not be exposed to AN. In view of the small concentrations generally encountered outside plants, women not professionally exposed would appear not to be at risk of teratogenic effects due to AN. Future research should concentrate on the elucidation of the different degradation pathways in man and on epidemiological studies in workers including pregnant women, assessing also, if possible, individual exposure by bio-monitoring.     

What is the significance of increases in background levels of carcinogen-derived protein and DNA adducts? Some considerations for incremental risk assessment

Improvements in analytical methodology have led to the detection and quantification of 'background' levels of a number of DNA and protein adducts. Many of these adducts are derived from 'low molecular weight' reactive species which may be generated during normal physiological processes, metabolic pathways or inflammatory processes. The adducts have been detected using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, HPLC in combination with various detection systems, 32P-postlabelling and immunoassay methods. The reliability and accuracy of many widely used methods for adduct measurements are discussed with reference to several examples where human data is available, namely 4-aminobiphenyl, malondialdehyde, methylating agents, ethylene oxide and hydroxyl radical damage. The accurate and specific quantitation of 'background' levels of damage is essential if reliable estimates of increases in risk associated with incremental increases in exposure to exogenous agents are to be calculated. In experimental studies using low dose exposures to carcinogens, such as N-nitrosodimethylamine, adduct levels in liver correlate closely with tumour incidence. In all likelihood, such relationships need to be established for each exposure and, in order to be relevant to human risk assessment, need to take into account factors such as DNA repair and mutagenic efficiency. Finally, in order to estimate the increase in cancer attributable to a given level of external exposure, it is clearly important to establish background levels of corresponding DNA damage so that the scale of the incremental increase can be calculated.     

Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of suspended particulate matter in the Seine river estuary

Highly mutagenic compounds such as some PAHs have been identified in surface waters and sediments of the Seine river estuary. Suspended particulate matter (SPM) represents a dynamic medium that may contribute to the exposure of aquatic organisms to toxic compounds in the water column of the estuary. In order to investigate major sources of mutagenic contaminants along the estuary, water samples were taken at 25 m downstream of the outlet of an industrial wastewater-treatment plant (WWTP). SPM samples were analyzed for their genotoxicity with two short-term tests, the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity assay (TA98+S9 mix) and the comet assay in the human HepG2 cell line. Sampling sites receiving effluents from a chemical dye industry and WWTP showed the highest mutagenic potencies, followed by petrochemical industries, petroleum refinery and pulp and paper mills. These data indicate that frame-shift mutagens are present in the Seine river estuary. Furthermore, the comet assay revealed the presence of compounds that were genotoxic for human hepatocytes (HepG2 cells). We also observed a high level of mutagenic potency in the sediment of the lower estuary (3 × 10? revertants/g). The source of mutagenic and genotoxic compounds seems to be associated with various types of effluents discharged in the Seine river estuary. Both test systems resulted in the same assessment of the genotoxicity of particulate matter, except for three of the 14 samples, underlying the complementarity of bioassays.     

DNA damage and autophagy

Both exogenous and endogenous agents are a threat to DNA integrity. Exogenous environmental agents such as ultraviolet (UV) and ionizing radiation, genotoxic chemicals and endogenous byproducts of metabolism including reactive oxygen species can cause alterations in DNA structure (DNA damage). Unrepaired DNA damage has been linked to a variety of human disorders including cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Thus, efficient mechanisms to detect DNA lesions, signal their presence and promote their repair have been evolved in cells. If DNA is effectively repaired, DNA damage response is inactivated and normal cell functioning resumes. In contrast, when DNA lesions cannot be removed, chronic DNA damage triggers specific cell responses such as cell death and senescence. Recently, DNA damage has been shown to induce autophagy, a cellular catabolic process that maintains a balance between synthesis, degradation, and recycling of cellular components. But the exact mechanisms by which DNA damage triggers autophagy are unclear. More importantly, the role of autophagy in the DNA damage response and cellular fate is unknown. In this review we analyze evidence that supports a role for autophagy as an integral part of the DNA damage response.     

Detoxification of electrophilic compounds by glutathione S-transferase catalysis: determinants of individual response to chemical carcinogens and chemotherapeutic drugs?

The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) catalyze the GSH-dependent detoxification of reactive electrophiles such as genotoxic chemical carcinogens and cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Allelic polymorphism in the GSTs has been used to investigate the hypothesis that GSTs are involved in susceptibility to human cancers. Such studies have resulted in low penetrance, high prevalence associations between cancer risk and GST polymorphisms. By examination of interindividual variation of GST expression it becomes clear that GST genotype alone is not an accurate predictor of GST expression. GST expression is tissue specific and interindividual variation of expression is at least 7-fold in normal tissues. Thus, populations of the same genotype are actually heterogeneous as regards expression. Similarly, polymorphisms are not effective in all tissues and GST induction is not independent of genotype. Mechanistic models for chemical aspects of colorectal cancer and chemotherapy for breast cancer demonstrate some of the ways by which such interactions can be studied and the potential for future studies.     

Mutagenicity,carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity of acrylonitrile

Acrylonitrile (AN) is an important intermediary for the synthesis of a variety of organic products, such as artificial fibres, household articles and resins. Although acute effects are the primary concern for an exposure to AN, potential genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic risks of AN have to be taken seriously in view of the large number of workers employed in such industries and the world-wide population using products containing and possibly liberating AN. An understanding of the effect of acrylonitrile must be based on a characterization of its metabolism as well as of the resulting products and their genotoxic properties. Tests for mutagenicity in bacteria have in general been positive, those in plants and on unscheduled DNA synthesis doubtful, and those on chromosome aberrations in vivo negative. Wherever positive results had been obtained, metabolic activation of AN appeared to be a prerequisite. The extent to which such mutagenic effects are significant in man depends, however, also on the conditions of exposure. It appears from the limited data that the ultimate mutagenic factor(s), such as 2-cyanoethylene oxide, may have little opportunity to act under conditions where people are exposed because it is formed only in small amounts and is rapidly degraded. The carcinogenic action of AN has been evaluated by various agencies and ranged from `reasonably be anticipated to be a human carcinogen' to `cannot be excluded', the most recent evaluation being `possibly carcinogenic to humans'. Animal data that confirm the carcinogenic potential of AN have certain limitations with respect to the choice of species, type of tumors and length of follow up. Epidemiological studies which sometimes, but not always, yielded positive results, encounter the usual difficulties of confounding factors in chemical industries. Exposure of workers to AN should continue to be carefully monitored, but AN would not have to be considered a cancer risk to the population provided limitations on releases from consumer products and guidelines on AN in water and air are enforced. AN is teratogenic in laboratory animals (rat, hamster) at high doses when foetal/embryonic (and maternal) toxicity already is manifest. Pregnant workers should not be exposed to AN. In view of the small concentrations generally encountered outside plants, women not professionally exposed would appear not to be at risk of teratogenic effects due to AN. Future research should concentrate on the elucidation of the different degradation pathways in man and on epidemiological studies in workers including pregnant women, assessing also, if possible, individual exposure by bio-monitoring.     

The role of DNA repeats and associated secondary structures in genomic instability and neoplasia

Tumour-associated genetic changes frequently involve DNA translocation or deletion. Many of these events will have arisen from initial genomic damage, induced by either the activity of endogenous metabolic processes or from exposure to environmental genotoxic agents. Although initial genomic damage will have been widely distributed, tumorigenic events are confined to certain DNA target sites. Furthermore, within these target sites there appear to be regions of preferential DNA rearrangement, and examination of these sites implies that the location and extent of such rearrangement may be influenced by DNA primary and secondary structure rather than simply by the point of damage. We selectively review evidence relating to DNA structures that may predispose certain regions of the genome to damage-induced rearrangement, and discuss the possible role of interstitial, inverted telomere-like sequence arrays in promoting chromosomal events of a type known to be associated with some human and animal tumours.