Does culture need genes?

Many of us are familiar with the idea that evolved constraints can influence the types and numbers of culture traits in a population. Thus, e.g., a particular foraging strategy, even though it is socially transmitted, becomes prevalent in a population because it is favored in innate learning rules tuned to recognize adaptively advantageous behaviors. The abundance, and importance, of such constraints are subjects of debate, especially in the case of human cultures.There has been somewhat less discussion about evolved constraints that sustain the general or overall form of culture. The hypothesis explored in the present study is that for something resembling human culture to be socially learnable, evolved constraints must take part in mental development. Otherwise, culture cannot be “transmitted,” irrespective of whether its component traits are “adaptive” or not. To do something useful with this conjecture, one must consider the meaning of terms such as the overall form of a culture and the outcomes of mental development. I briefly summarize the background to this subject and outline one of the theoretical approaches we are currently investigating. In this the overall form of a culture is the overall form of communally shared networks of knowledge and meaning. Their transformation into individual knowledge and competence is the outcome of mental development. A principal question is how to get at the role of evolved constraints in a system like this. This will be discussed by reference to learnability theory and to specific applications involving the sociobiology of the imagination.     

More genes in vertebrates?

With the acquisition of complete genome sequences from several animals, there is renewed interest in the pattern of genome evolution on our own lineage. One key question is whether gene number increased during chordate or vertebrate evolution. It is argued here that comparing the total number of genes between a fly, a nematode and human is not appropriate to address this question. Extensive gene loss after duplication is one complication; another is the problem of comparing taxa that are phylogenetically very distant. Amphioxus and tunicates are more appropriate animals for comparison to vertebrates. Comparisons of clustered homeobox genes, where gene loss can be identified, reveals a one to four mode of evolution for Hox and ParaHox genes. Analyses of other gene families in amphioxus and vertebrates confirm that gene duplication was very widespread on the vertebrate lineage. These data confirm that vertebrates have more genes than their closest invertebrate relatives, acquired through gene duplication. abbreviations IHGSC, International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium; TCESC, The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium.     

What are housekeeping genes?

The concept of “housekeeping gene” has been used for four decades but remains loosely defined. Housekeeping genes are commonly described as “essential for cellular existence regardless of their specific function in the tissue or organism”, and “stably expressed irrespective of tissue type, developmental stage, cell cycle state, or external signal”. However, experimental support for the tenet that gene essentiality is linked to stable expression across cell types, conditions, and organisms has been limited. Here we use genome-scale functional genomic screens together with bulk and single-cell sequencing technologies to test this link and optimize a quantitative and experimentally validated definition of housekeeping gene. Using the optimized definition, we identify, characterize, and provide as resources, housekeeping gene lists extracted from several human datasets, and 10 other animal species that include primates, chicken, and C. elegans. We find that stably expressed genes are not necessarily essential, and that the individual genes that are essential and stably expressed can considerably differ across organisms; yet the pathways enriched among these genes are conserved. Further, the level of conservation of housekeeping genes across the analyzed organisms captures their taxonomic groups, showing evolutionary relevance for our definition. Therefore, we present a quantitative and experimentally supported definition of housekeeping genes that can contribute to better understanding of their unique biological and evolutionary characteristics.     

More genes in fish?

Certain species of fish have recently become important model systems in comparative genomics and in developmental biology, in certain instances because of their small genome sizes (e.g., in the pufferfish) and, in other cases, because of the opportunity they provide to combine an easily accessible and experimentally manipulable embryology with the power of genetic approaches (e.g., in the zebrafish). The resulting accumulation of genomic information indicates that, surprisingly, many gene families of fish consist of more members than in mammals. Most modern fish, including the zebrafish and medakka, are diploid organisms; however, the greater number of genes in fish was possibly caused by additional ancient genome duplications which happened in the lineage leading to modern ray-finned fishes but not along the lineage leading to tetrapods. Since these two lineages shared their last common ancestor (in the Devonian about 360 million years ago) individual duplicated members of gene families were later lost in fish. Interestingly, comparative data indicate that, in some cases, genes in mammals even serve somewhat different functions than their homologues in fish, highlighting that the degree of evolutionary relatedness of genes is not always a reliable predictor of their evolutionary conservation and their similarity of function. Since fish are phenotypically probably not more complex than mammals, it is possible that evolution took alternative paths to the “economics of genomics” through alternative solutions to gene regulation. It is suggested that the more complex genomic architecture of fish permitted them to adapt and speciate quickly in response to changing selective regimes. BioEssays 20 :511–515, 1998. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Do essential genes evolve slowly?

Approximately two thirds of all knockouts of individual mouse genes give rise to viable fertile mice. These genes have thus been termed 'non-essential' in contrast to 'essential' genes, the knockouts of which result in death or infertility. Although non-essential genes are likely to be under selection that favours sequence conservation [1], it is predicted that they are less subject to such stabilising selection than essential genes, and hence evolve faster [2]. We have addressed this issue by analysing the molecular evolution of 108 non-essential and 67 essential genes that have been sequenced in both mouse and rat. On preliminary analysis, the non-essential genes appeared to be faster evolving than the essential ones. We found, however, that the non-essential class contains a disproportionate number of immune-system genes that may be under directional selection (that is, selection favouring change) because of host-parasite coevolution. After correction for this bias, we found that the rate at which genes evolve does not correlate with the severity of the knockout phenotype. This was corroborated by the finding that, whereas neuron-specific genes have significantly lower rates of change than other genes, essential and non-essential neuronal genes have comparable rates of evolution. Our findings most probably reflect strong selection acting against even very subtle deleterious phenotypes, and indicate that the putative involvement of directional selection in host-parasite coevolution and gene expression within the nervous system explains much more of the variance in rates of gene evolution than does the knockout phenotype.     

Schizophrenia: genes at last?

Genetic epidemiological studies suggest that individual variation in susceptibility to schizophrenia is largely genetic, reflecting alleles of moderate to small effect in multiple genes. Molecular genetic studies have identified several potential regions of linkage and two associated chromosomal abnormalities, and evidence is accumulating in favour of several positional candidate genes. Currently, the positional candidate genes for which we consider the evidence to be strong are those encoding dysbindin (DTNBP1) and neuregulin 1 (NRG1). For other genes, disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DISC1), D-amino-acid oxidase (DAO), D-amino-acid oxidase activator (DAOA, formerly known as G72) and regulator of G-protein signalling 4 (RGS4), the data are promising but not yet compelling. The identification of these, and other susceptibility genes, will open up new avenues for research aimed at understanding the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, and will catalyse a re-appraisal of the classification of psychiatric disorders.     

Clingy genes: Why were genes for ribosomal proteins retained in many mitochondrial genomes?

Why mitochondria still retain their own genome is a puzzle given the enormous effort to maintain a mitochondrial translation machinery. Most mitochondrially encoded proteins are membrane-embedded subunits of the respiratory chain. Their hydrophobicity presumably impedes their import into mitochondria. However, many mitochondrial genomes also encode protein subunits of the mitochondrial ribosome. These proteins lack transmembrane domains and hydrophobicity cannot explain why their genes remained in mitochondria. In this review, we provide an overview about mitochondrially encoded subunits of mitochondrial ribosomes of fungi, plants and protists. Moreover, we discuss and evaluate different hypotheses which were put forward to explain why (ribosomal) proteins remained mitochondrially encoded. It seems likely that the synthesis of ribosomal proteins in the mitochondrial matrix is used to regulate the assembly of the mitochondrial ribosome within mitochondria and to avoid problems that mitochondrial proteins might pose for cytosolic proteostasis and for the assembly of cytosolic ribosomes.     

MUC genes: a superfamily of genes? Towards a functional classification of human apomucins

The MUC genes encode epithelial mucins. Eight different human genes have been well characterized, and two others identified more recently. Among them, a family of four genes, expressed in the respiratory and digestive tracts, is clustered to chromosome 11p15.5; and these genes encode gel-forming mucins which are structurally related to the superfamily of cystine-knot growth factors. A second group is composed of three independent genes encoding various isoforms of mucins including membrane-bound mucins associated to carcinomas. In this second group, MUC3 and MUC4 encode large apomucins containing EGF-like domains.     

α-Amylase structural genes in rye

Summary Rye -Amy1, -Amy2, and -Amy3 genes were studied in the cross between inbred lines using wheat -amylase cDNA probes. The -Amy1 and -Amy2 probes uncovered considerable restriction fragment length polymorphism, whereas the -Amy3 region was much more conserved. The numbers of restriction fragments found and the F₂ segregation data suggest that there are three -Amy1 genes, two or three -Amy2 genes, and three -Amy3 genes in rye. These conclusions were supported by a simultaneous study of -amylase isozyme polymorphism. The F₂ data showed the three individual -Amy1 genes to span a distance of 3cM at the locus on chromosome 6RL. The genes were mapped relative to other RFLP markers on 6RL. On chromosome 7RL two -Amy2 genes were shown to be separated by 5 cM. Linkage data within -Amy3 on 5RL were not obtained since RFLP could be detected at only one of the genes.     

Mammalian genes as molecular clocks?

In analyzing the silent nucleotide substitutions in some mammalian mitochondrial mRNA coding genes, we had found that the frequency of each of the four nucleotides in rat, mouse, and cow, but not in humans, is the same in the silent third codon position (Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G (1984) J Mol Evol 20:86-93). Because our findings for these three species were compatible with a stationary Markov process for the evolution of nucleotide sequences, we applied such a model to calculate the effective evolutionary silent substitution rate (vs) and the divergence times among the species. In this paper we have analyzed the first and second codon positions in the same mammalian mitochondrial genes. We found that in the first and second codon positions the human mitochondrial genes satisfy the stationarity conditions. This has allowed us to use the stochastic model mentioned above to calculate the divergence times among mouse, rat, cow, and human. Furthermore, we have analyzed the silent substitution rate in one nuclear gene for these four mammals. We found that in this gene the effective silent substitution rate is about 3 times lower than in mitochondrial genes, and that humans are in this case stationary with respect to the other three mammals in the third codon position as well. Application of our Markov model to this latter gene yields divergence times consistent with our previous determinations.     

Identification of novel α-gliadin genes

Ten novel α-gliadin genes (Gli-ta, Gli-turg1, Gli-turg2, Gli-turg3, Gli-turg4, Gli-turg5, Gli-turg6, Gli-cs1, Gli-cs2, and Gli-cs3) with unique characteristics were isolated from wheat (Triticum aestivumL.), among which Gli-cs1, Gli-cs2, Gli-cs3, and Gli-turg6 were pseudogenes. Gli-cs3 and nine other sequences were much larger and smaller, respectively, than the typical α-gliadins. This variation was caused by insertion or deletion of the unique domain I and a polyglutamine region, possibly the result of illegitimate recombination. Consequently, Gli-cs3 contained 10 cysteine residues, whereas there were 2 cysteine residues only in the other nine sequences. Gli-ta/Gli-ta-like α-gliadin genes are normally expressed during the development of seeds. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that in-vitro-expressed Gli-ta could form intermolecular disulphide bonds and could be chain extenders. A protein band similar in size to Gli-ta has been observed in seed extracts, and mass spectrometry results confirm that the band contains small molecular mass α-gliadins, which is a characteristic of the novel α-gliadins. Mass spectrometry results also indicated that the two cysteine residues of Gli-ta/Gli-ta-like proteins participated in the formation of intermolecular disulphide bonds in vivo.     

What drives plant stress genes?

Currently, there is a lot of interest in the plant stress response. Using large-scale genomics approaches, more and more genes are being identified that are involved in or even regulate this complex process. The recent boost in expression profile analyses for several plant stress responses has enabled the identification of new promoter elements as important factors in establishing the expression regulatory network controlling plant stress response.     

Equilibrium frequencies of α-globin genes

A mathematical model has been developed to study the mechanism of the maintenance of variable numbers of α-globin genes in human populations. The model incorporates both selection and unequal crossing-over. The selection is formulated so that a homozygous individual with a double deletion is lethal and a heterozygous individual with a deletion or addition of an α-globin gene in a chromosome has decreased fitness. This differs from the previous models of stabilizing selection studied by Ohta (1981) and Takahata (1981). The effect of random genetic drift on the α-thalassemia polymorphims has also been studied.It has been shown that, although the results obtained are compatible with the observation of the low frequency of triple α-globin loci, it cannot explain the high frequency of single and double deletions in Asian populations. For the latter case, some type of heterozygote advantage may be operating.     

How essential are nonessential genes?

Gene essentiality in bacteria has been identified in silico, focusing on gene persistence, or experimentally, focusing on the growth of knockouts in rich media. Comparing 55 genomes of Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria to identify the genes which, while persistent among genomes, do not lead to a lethal phenotype when inactivated, we show that the characteristics of persistence, conservation, expression, and location are shared between persistent nonessential (PNE) genes and experimentally essential genes. PNE genes show an overrepresentation of genes related to maintenance and stress response. This outlines the limits of current experimental techniques to define gene essentiality and highlights the essential role of genes implicated in maintenance which, although dispensable for growth, are not dispensable from an evolutionary point of view. Firmicutes and Gamma-proteobacteria are mostly differing in the construction of the cell envelope, DNA replication and proofreading, and RNA degradation. In addition to suggesting functions for persistent genes that had until now resisted identification, we show that these genes have many characters in common with experimentally identified essential genes. They should then be regarded as truly essential genes.     

Are sex-biased genes more dispensable?

Many genes show different expression levels in males and females, and these form the basis of sexually dimorphic phenotypes. Sex-biased genes experience accelerated rates of protein evolution, which has been attributed to sexual selection. However, it is possible that the increased rates of molecular evolution, and more importantly the sex-biased gene expression pattern itself, are due to decreased selective constraint. This notion may explain many of the patterns associated with sex-biased gene expression, and changes how we should view the role of natural and sexual selection in relation to these genes.     

Mammalian genes as molecular clocks?

Summary In analyzing the silent nucleotide substitutions in some mammalian mitochondrial mRNA coding genes, we had found that the frequency of each of the four nucleotides in rat, mouse, and cow, but not in humans, is the same in the silent third codon position (Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G (1984) J Mol Evol 20:86-93). Because our findings for these three species were compatible with a stationary Markov process for the evolution of nucleotide sequences, we applied such a model to calculate the effective evolutionary silent substitution rate (v_s) and the divergence times among the species. In this paper we have analyzed the first and second codon positions in the same mammalian mitochondrial genes. We found that in the first and second codon positions the human mitochondrial genes satisfy the stationarity conditions. This has allowed us to use the stochastic model mentioned above to calculate the divergence times among mouse, rat, cow, and human. Furthermore, we have analyzed the silent substitution rate in one nuclear gene for these four mammals. We found that in this gene the effective silent substitution rate is about 3 times lower than in mitochondrial genes, and that humans are in this case stationary with respect to the other three mammals in the third codon position as well. Application of our Markov model to this latter gene yields divergence times consistent with our previous determinations.