Induction of systemic resistance in plants

When a pathogen is perceived by a host plant, a series of defense responses can be activated. One of these are "local" defenses that occur rapidly at the site of pathogen invasion. Another are "systemic" defenses that are induced in uninoculated parts of the plant. Recently, molecular genetic studies have revealed genes that are signaling components of systemic resistance pathways. Cloning of these genes and characterization of the function of their proteins is now providing insights to processes regulating plant defense against pathogens. Evidence that "systemic" defenses are important for resistance is that when the way is blocked in transgenic plants or in mutants, the plant's defense is compromised. When the pathway is stimulated by exogenous compounds or in mutants, the host resistance is strengthened. A detailed understanding of this pathway is important for both practical and theoretical reasons.     

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-enhanced resistance against Phytophthora sojae infection on soybean leaves is mediated by a network involving hydrogen peroxide, jasmonic acid, and the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen

The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhance the resistance to pathogen infection in host plant. However, it is unclear how the AMF are involved in the systemic acquired resistance of host plant against pathogen. Here, an experiment was carried out to clarify the role of the AMF in soybean’s defense against the infection from pathogen Phytophthora sojae. It was found that the AMF contributed to the resistance of soybean against Phytophthora sojae by the release of hydrogen peroxide and by the accumulation of jasmonic acid in response to pathogenic invasion. Furthermore, the trade of nitrogen (N) from the fungus for carbon from the host was accelerated in the AM symbiosis in the defense reaction, which was indicated by the increased soluble sugar level, NO content and enzyme activities involved in N metabolism in the AM symbiosis.     

Signal recognition and transduction mediated by the tomato Pto kinase: a paradigm of innate immunity in plants

Plant disease resistance is the result of an innate host defense mechanism, which relies on the ability of the plant to recognize pathogen invasion and to efficiently mount defense responses. In tomato, resistance to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is mediated by the specific interaction between the plant serine/threonine kinase Pto and the bacterial protein AvrPto. This article reviews molecular and biochemical properties that confer to Pto the capability to function as an intracellular receptor and to activate a signaling cascade leading to the induction of defense responses.     

Inducible defense against pathogens and parasites: optimal choice among multiple options

Defense against pathogen, parasites and herbivores is often enhanced after their invasion into the host's body. Sometimes different options are adopted depending on the identity and the quantity of the pathogen, exemplified by the switch between Th1 and Th2 systems in mammalian immunity. In this paper, we study the optimal defense of the host when two alternative responses are available, which differ in the effectiveness of suppressing the growth of pathogen (parasite, or herbivore), the damage to the host caused by the defense response, and the magnitude of time delay before the defense response becomes fully effective. The optimal defense is the one that minimizes the sum of the damages caused by the pathogen and the cost due to defense activities. The damage by pathogens increases in proportion to the time integral of the pathogen abundance, and the cost is proportional to the defense activity. We can prove that a single globally optimal combination of defense options always exists and there is no other local optimum. Depending on the parameters, the optimal is to adopt only the early response, only the late response, or both responses. The defense response with a shorter time delay is more heavily used when the pathogen grows fast, the initial pathogen abundance is large, and the difference in time delay is long. We also study the host's optimal choice between constitutive and inducible defenses. In the constitutive defense, the response to pathogen attack works without delay, but it causes the cost even when the pathogen attack does not occur. We discuss mammalian immunity and the plant chemical defense from the model's viewpoint.     

Shaping the understanding of saliva-derived effectors towards aphid colony proliferation in host plant

‘Effectors’ are proteins and/or small molecules that originated from aphid saliva gland and its secretion is initiated due to interaction between host and insect. The effectors have the ability to manipulate the host cell structure as well as function similar to pathogen’s effectors. Like pathogen’s effectors, aphid effectors suppress the hosts’ defense responses as well as hosts’ defense induction or both. In the susceptible interaction with the host, aphid effectors alter plant processes that contribute to the establishment of compatibility that promotes aphid proliferation. In the susceptible reaction with the host, aphid effectors contribute to the successful salivation and sustainability of the sieve element sap ingestion that have promoting role in more aphid proliferation. In the resistant interaction with the host, aphid effectors are recognized by the typical plant receptors and elicit the induction the effective defense response. As a result, aphid proliferation is reduced due to reduced compatibility establishment in the resistant host. This review focuses on the exciting progress in aphid effector biology that insights new perspective in the molecular basis of plant–aphid interactions.     

植物核质运输与其先天免疫研究进展

植物为了抵御病原菌的侵染而进化出一套独特的先天免疫系统,它主要通过定位在细胞膜或细胞质上的受体介导并激活下游抗病基因表达而实现,但在这些信号传递过程中,细胞质的信号向核传递需要核质运输相关元件的参与。虽然目前只有个别核质运输的信号元件被证实参与了植物的先天免疫信号传递过程,但越来越多的研究表明核质运输是连接抗病基因表达和信号识别受体的一个主要方式。研究发现,病原菌的效应因子也可以利用植物核质运输机制侵入到宿主细胞核内,调控敏感基因的表达,干扰植物的免疫反应。该文对近年来国内外有关植物的核质运输机制、各层次免疫反应需要核质运输作用、核质运输相关蛋白在免疫反应中的作用等方面对核质运输参与植物先天免疫反应研究的研究进展进行综述,并指出该领域未来研究的主要内容和方向。     

Loss of susceptibility as a novel breeding strategy for durable and broad-spectrum resistance

Recent studies on plant immunity have suggested that a pathogen should suppress induced plant defense in order to infect a plant species, which otherwise would have been a nonhost to the pathogen. For this purpose, pathogens exploit effector molecules to interfere with different layers of plant defense responses. In this review, we summarize the latest findings on plant factors that are activated by pathogen effectors to suppress plant immunity. By looking from a different point of view into host and nonhost resistance, we propose a novel breeding strategy: disabling plant disease susceptibility genes (S-genes) to achieve durable and broad-spectrum resistance.     

The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopAM1 enhances virulence on water-stressed plants

Pseudomonas syringae strains deliver diverse type III effector proteins into host cells, where they can act as virulence factors. Although the functions of the majority of type III effectors are unknown, several have been shown to interfere with plant basal defense mechanisms. Type III effectors also could contribute to bacterial virulence by enhancing nutrient uptake and pathogen adaptation to the environment of the host plant. We demonstrate that the type III effector HopAM1 (formerly known as AvrPpiB) enhances the virulence of a weak pathogen in plants that are grown under drought stress. This is the first report of a type III effector that aids pathogen adaptation to water availability in the host plant. Expression of HopAM1 makes transgenic Ws-0 Arabidopsis hypersensitive to abscisic acid (ABA) for stomatal closure and germination arrest. Conditional expression of HopAM1 in Arabidopsis also suppresses basal defenses. ABA responses overlap with defense responses and ABA has been shown to suppress defense against P. syringae pathogens. We propose that HopAM1 aids P. syringae virulence by manipulation of ABA responses that suppress defense responses. In addition, host ABA responses enhanced by type III delivery of HopAM1 protect developing bacterial colonies inside leaves from osmotic stress.     

Plant NB-LRR immune receptors: from recognition to transcriptional reprogramming

Both plants and animals contain nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR)-type immune receptors that function during defense against pathogens. Unlike animal NB-LRRs that recognize general pathogen or microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs), plant NB-LRR immune receptors have evolved the ability to specifically recognize a wide range of effector proteins from different pathogens. Recent research has revealed that plant NB-LRRs are incredibly adaptive in their ways of pathogen recognition and defense initiation. This review focuses on the remarkable variety of functions, recognition mechanisms, subcellular localizations, and host factors associated with plant NB-LRR immune receptors.     

病原菌逃避宿主细胞防御的策略

病原菌对宿主致病是病原菌与宿主复杂相互作用的结果。病原菌与宿主相互作用可造成宿主在细胞、组织及器官不同水平的损伤。病原菌对宿主的致病性及毒力,一方面在于病原菌,另一方面在于宿主因素以及宿主与病原菌的相互作用。病原菌-宿主在细胞水平的相互作用是病原菌感染致病的重要环节。结合本课题组对猪链球菌的研究,从黏附与定殖、侵袭、逃避与扩散等方面概述病原菌逃避宿主细胞防御的机制。     

Mucin and Toll-like receptors in host defense against intestinal parasites

Gastrointestinal mucin is a constituent of luminal barrier function and is the first line of host defense against invading pathogens. Mucin carbohydrates and amino acids, as well as trapped soluble host defense molecules, serve as substrates for colonization and control or deter pathogen invasion to the underlying mucosal epithelial cells. Toll-like receptors on the surface of epithelial cells act as sensors for invading pathogens, and the ensuing host response limits parasite invasion and leads to adaptive immunity. The latest work in the field and the use of parasite model systems to illustrate the delicate host-parasite interaction at the mucosal surface of the gut are discussed here.     

Fungal Pathogens: The Battle for Plant Infection

The attempted infection of a plant by a pathogen, such as a fungus or an Oomycete, may be regarded as a battle whose major weapons are proteins and smaller chemical compounds produced by both organisms. Indeed, plants produce an astonishing plethora of defense compounds that are still being discovered at a rapid pace. This pattern arose from a multi-million year, ping-pong?type co-evolution, in which plant and pathogen successively added new chemical weapons in this perpetual battle. As each defensive innovation was established in the host, new ways to circumvent it evolved in the pathogen. This complex co-evolution process probably explains not only the exquisite specificity observed between many pathogens and their hosts, but also the ineffectiveness or redundancy of some defensive genes which often encode enzymes with overlapping activities. Plants evolved a complex, multi-level series of structural and chemical barriers that are both constitutive or preformed and inducible. These defenses may involve strengthening of the cell wall, hypersensitive response (HR), oxidative burst, phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. The pathogen must successfully overcome these obstacles before it succeeds in causing disease. In some cases, it needs to modulate or modify plant cell metabolism to its own benefit and/or to abolish defense reactions. Central to the activation of plant responses is timely perception of the pathogen by the plant. A crucial role is played by elicitors which, depending on their mode of action, are broadly classified into nonspecific elicitors and highly specific elicitors or virulence effector/avirulence factors. A protein battle for penetration is then initiated, marking the pathogen attempted transition from extracellular to invasive growth before parasitism and disease can be established. Three major types of defense responses may be observed in plants: non-host resistance, host resistance, and host pathogenesis. Plant innate immunity may comprise a continuum from non-host resistance involving the detection of general elicitors to host-specific resistance involving detection of specific elicitors by R proteins. It was generally assumed that non-host resistance was based on passive mechanisms and that nonspecific rejection usually arose as a consequence of the non-host pathogen failure to breach the first lines of plant defense. However, recent evidence has blurred the clear-cut distinction among non-host resistance, host-specific resistance and disease. The same obstacles are also serious challenges for host pathogens, reducing their success rate significantly in causing disease. Indeed, even susceptible plants mount a (insufficient) defense response upon recognition of pathogen elicited molecular signals. Recent evidence suggests the occurrence of significant overlaps between the protein components and signalling pathways of these types of resistance, suggesting the existence of both shared and unique features for the three branches of plant innate immunity.     

Cereal host interactions with Russian wheat aphid: A review

Abstract

A lack of understanding the interaction between the Russian wheat aphid (RWA) and its host plant is a limitation in developing effective strategies for controlling the aphid. It is generally assumed that the interaction between aphid and plant is similar to that between plant and pathogen; that is, an elicitor from the insect is recognized by a protein from the host plant and a cascade of signal transduction events follows. However, evidence suggests that RWA feeding is eliciting both the SA- and JA/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways by mimicking aspects of both pathogen and herbivorous insect attacks. Results further suggest that phenotypic symptoms after RWA feeding are under regulation via two independent reactions, namely an immediate response (i.e., leaf rolling) and a downstream event (i.e., chlorosis). These defense responses enable a resistant host plant to defend itself and overcome the stress response, while their susceptible counterparts die. The processes involved in the onset of the defense response are discussed, and mechanisms enabling resistant plants to overcome the stress associated with the feeding process are presented as a working model for RWA-cereal host interaction. Knowledge of genes involved in wheat's defense responses against the RWA and an understanding of their functions may provide additional strategies for developing broad-spectrum resistance in plants.     

Salicylic Acid and Disease Resistance in Plants

SA has been shown to play an important signaling role in the activation of various plant defense responses following pathogen attack. These responses include the induction of local and systemic disease resistance, the potentiation of host cell death, and the containment of pathogen spread. The mechanisms through which SA mediates these effects are varied and can involve alterations in the activity or synthesis of certain enzymes, increased defense gene expression, potentiation of several defense responses, and/or the generation of free radicals. Through the analysis of mutant plants exhibiting aberrant responses to pathogen infection, many genes encoding products involved in the SA-mediated defense pathway(s) have been isolated. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that certain defense responses can be activated via a SA-independent pathway(s). This review focuses primarily on recent discoveries pertaining to the SA signaling pathway(s) leading to disease resistance; however, a very brief discussion of the SA-independent pathway (s) and its ability to cross-talk with the SA pathway is also presented.     

Show and tell: cell biology of pathogen invasion

Because the initial stages of pathogen invasion are often confined to a limited number of host cells, measures of host responses that are averaged over attacked and non-attacked cells provide an unsatisfactory view of these events. To identify the earliest and often transient responses to pathogen attack, there is considerable interest in monitoring the subcellular events that occur specifically in living host cells. Recent improvements in live-cell imaging using fluorescent-tagged markers have expanded the scope of the experiments that can be performed. Changes in the subcellular distribution of organelles and of fluorescently tagged proteins can be monitored in real time in living tissues during pathogen attack, and the dynamic nature of such changes across space and over time can be determined. The application of these sensitive imaging methods has extended earlier observations, made with Nomarski microscopy or inferred from static transmission electron micrographs, about the focal accumulation of subcellular organelles at sites of pathogen attack. In addition, recent experiments have demonstrated the focused accumulation and interaction of specific plant proteins at penetration sites, opening a new window on early host responses and raising questions about the underlying plant processes that sense and direct this marshalling of host resources to block pathogen entry.