受体酪氨酸激酶依赖的信号转导在突触可塑性中的研究

突触可塑性对于脑发育过程中的神经环路重构以及学习记忆等脑的高级功能是非常重要的。许多受体酪氨酸激酶家族成员,包括TrkB、ErbB和Eph在神经连接的建立和重构过程中起到核心作用。比如,突触后EphB依赖的信号会导致树突棘的产生和神经递质受体的聚集,而ephrinA引起的EphA4激活可以导致树突棘的回缩。但是,目前对EphA4依赖的树突棘重组和对神经递质受体的调节背后的机制还知之甚少。本文将集中探讨EphA4及其下游的信号通路在神经肌肉接头和中枢神经的突触中,对神经递质受体的调节功能。     

树突棘的动态变化与调控机制

树突棘是兴奋性突触的主要突触后结构基础,其数量与形态受神经电活动调控,并在整个生命过程中呈现复杂且有序的动态变化。树突棘的动态变化在神经环路的形成和精确化修剪中扮演重要的角色,该过程的异常可导致孤独症谱系障碍、精神分裂症等神经系统疾病。主要综述了近年来关于树突棘形态与数量动态变化的研究工作,包括发育早期的树突棘发生和青春期的树突棘修剪。在此基础上,还简要阐述了介导树突棘动态变化的信号分子,讨论了其与神经系统疾病的关联,并提出了该领域尚未解决的一些问题。     

Drebrin与认知功能障碍

树突棘和突触的病理改变在认知功能障碍发病机制中具有十分重要的作用,研究表明大脑发育调节蛋白（developmentregulationbrainprotein,Drebrin）能够调节树突棘和突触的形态和重塑。Drebrin的减少可能通过树突棘内细胞骨架变化,使树突棘的形态结构受到影响,导致突触功能和结构的变化。但目前阿尔茨海默病（Alzheimer’Sdisease,AD）脑内突触病理变化的具体机制及Drebrin和突触之间的关系仍不明确。探讨Drebrin与认知功能的关系及其机制,对临床上早期干预认知功能障碍、寻找AD的有效诊断治疗措施具有重要意义。     

谷氨酸受体调控树突棘形态可塑性的研究进展

树突棘是神经元之间产生直接联系的部位,其形态可塑性是记忆的结构基础。谷氨酸信息传递是中枢神经信息传递的主要方式,能产生突触传递效率的可塑性,由此引起树突棘形态的可塑性变化。本文从谷氨酸受体途径的角度对树突棘形态可塑性的调控机制做一综述。谷氨酸受体主要通过其下游信号分子调节棘内肌动蛋白动力学蛋白,参与树突棘的形态发生和稳定。该作用在局部受到不同的蛋白、信号分子、激素、mi RNAs的调节,从而参与生理及病理过程。最后,提出展望,研究脑区特异的局部微环境变化对记忆相关疾病病因及治疗探讨有参考价值。     

细胞间黏附分子5在树突棘发育和突触可塑性中的研究进展

诸多神经精神性疾病的发生均伴有树突棘发育异常。免疫球蛋白超家族成员细胞间黏附分子5(intercellular adhesion molecule 5,ICAM5)是一个通过抑制树突棘成熟,将其维持在丝状形态的跨膜蛋白,它只表达于端脑兴奋性神经元,可能与树突棘发育、突触可塑性乃至学习记忆密切相关。现综述了ICAM5的发现和特征、分子结构、基因结构、在树突棘发育过程中的作用,以及与脆性X综合征等疾病的关系,试图为阐明发育阶段脑神经元异常树突棘形成的机制提供线索。     

NMDA受体参与皮层内突触结构和功能的调节

在中枢神经系统内神经细胞的树突棘是突触信息传递的重要部位,树突棘的体积和密度影响神经环路的功能。2007年美国加利福尼亚大学的SilaK．Ultanir等人在皮层NRl亚基（是NMDA受体的必要组分）基因敲除的小鼠上发现NMDA受体对树突棘的发育有重要影响。急性分离出生后三周内小鼠的脑片,用电压钳全细胞记录的方法,发现在皮层2／3层的锥体细胞中,AMPA受体介导的微小兴奋性突触后电流（mEP-SC）的幅度和频率均明显增大。     

关于mGluR在脆性X综合征发病机制中的研究新进展

脆性X综合征为最常见的遗传性智力低下性疾病之一,是由于FMR1基因异常导致其编码的脆性X智力低下蛋白减少或缺失所致.研究发现脆性X综合征尸解病人和FMR1基因敲除小鼠(KO鼠)神经元树突棘发育不成熟,模型小鼠海马区代谢性谷氨酸受体所触发的长时程抑制(LTD)延长,不成熟的树突棘导致突触功能障碍被认为是脑功能异常的基础.最近的研究表明,应用代谢性谷氨酸受体拮抗剂能改善由FMRP缺失所导致的突触和行为缺陷,表明mGluR功能过度激活可能参与了脆性X综合征的发病过程,但具体机制不明.FMRP是一种mRNA结合蛋白,可作为翻译抑制因子负性调节突触后膜mRNA的翻译和表达.因此推测FMRP缺乏和减少可能导致mGluR激发的mRNA翻译增多,参与神经系统发育的蛋白过度表达,而影响树突棘的发育,但具体机制仍不清楚.本文对mGluR和脆性X综合征的研究历史和最新进展进行了讨论.     

竞争机制介导树突棘的协同修剪与成熟

树突棘是中枢神经系统中绝大多数兴奋性突触的突触后位点。在出生后早期,脑内树突棘大量形成;当个体进入青少年期,脑内树突棘总数逐渐减少,这一过程被称为树突棘修剪,并被认为是神经环路精确化的重要过程。在孤独症谱系障碍、精神分裂症等发育性神经系统疾病中被报道存在树突棘修剪的异常。虽然树突棘修剪的现象已被广泛描述,然而介导该过程的分子机制尚待进一步研究。该研究组近期工作发现,在小鼠触须所对应的感觉皮层,树突棘的修剪与成熟是协同发生的,并且受感觉经验的双向调控。进一步研究发现,神经电活动可以引起相邻树突棘对cadherin/catenin细胞黏附复合物的竞争,导致该复合物的重新分布,并使这两个树突棘的命运产生分化:得到cadherin/catenin复合物的树突棘变得更加成熟而相邻失去这些分子的树突棘变小或被修剪。这一cadherin/catenin复合物依赖的竞争机制为树突棘的协同成熟与修剪提供了特异性,对于理解介导神经环路精确化的机制至关重要。     

活性依赖的突触抑制和突触稳态的分子机制

常规RNA干涉或基因敲除的功能缺失手段仅仅只是简单地移除某个基因或蛋白,而这个过程常常会掩盖磷酸化对某个特定蛋白的调节。在树突发育和突触功能活性依赖的调节过程中,突触后致密蛋白磷酸化的机制仍然是未知的领域。突触后Rap GTP酶激活蛋白SPAR与PSD95结合,可以促进树突棘的生长并加强突触。Plk2（polo-like kinase2,也称为Snk）是一种受突触活性诱导表达的蛋白激酶,它可以磷酸化SPAR,磷酸化的SPAR通过泛素化．蛋白酶体途径降解,从而导致树突棘和突触的减少。Plk2的诱导表达和随后SPAR的降解是长时间神经活性增强过程中突触强度的稳态抑制（突触剥落）所必需的。有趣的是,SPAR需要被另外一种激酶cDK5磷酸化后才能被Plk2所降解。这种机制通过CDK5对一部分突触进行标记,为由Plk2-SPAR通路抑制或去除这些突触提供了可能的途径,但其分子机制在神经退行性疾病突触丢失中的作用仍需进一步探讨。     

神经元的突触可塑性与学习和记忆

大量研究表明,神经元的突触可塑性包括功能可塑性和结构可塑性,与学习和记忆密切相关.最近,在经过训练的动物海马区,记录到了学习诱导的长时程增强(long term potentiation,LTP),如果用激酶抑制剂阻断晚期LTP,就会使大鼠丧失训练形成的记忆.这些结果指出,LTP可能是形成记忆的分子基础.因此,进一步研究哺乳动物脑内突触可塑性的分子机制,对揭示学习和记忆的神经基础有重要意义.此外,在精神迟滞性疾病和神经退行性疾病患者脑内记录到异常的LTP,并发现神经元的树突棘数量减少,形态上产生畸变或萎缩,同时发现,产生突变的基因大多编码调节突触可塑性的信号通路蛋白,故突触可塑性研究也将促进精神和神经疾病的预防和治疗.综述了突触可塑性研究的最新进展,并展望了其发展前景.     

Looking forward to EphB signaling in synapses

Eph receptors and their ligands ephrins comprise a complex signaling system with diverse functions that span a wide range of tissues and developmental stages. The variety of Eph receptor functions stems from their ability to mediate bidirectional signaling through trans-cellular Eph/ephrin interactions. Initially thought to act by directing repulsion between cells, Ephs have also been demonstrated to induce and maintain cell adhesive responses at excitatory synapses in the central nervous system. EphB receptors are essential to the development and maintenance of dendritic spines, which accommodate the postsynaptic sites of most glutamatergic excitatory synapses in the brain. Functions of EphB receptors are not limited to control of the actin cytoskeleton in dendritic spines, as EphB receptors are also involved in the formation of functional synaptic specializations through the regulation of glutamate receptor trafficking and functions. In addition, EphB receptors have recently been linked to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease and neuropathic pain, thus becoming promising targets for therapeutic interventions. In this review, we discuss recent findings on EphB receptor functions in synapses, as well as the mechanisms of bidirectional trans-synaptic ephrin-B/EphB receptor signaling that shape dendritic spines and influence post-synaptic differentiation.     

Eph/ephrin signaling in morphogenesis, neural development and plasticity

Ephrins are cell-surface-tethered ligands for Eph receptors, the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases. During development, the Eph/ephrin cell communication system appears to influence cell behavior such as attraction/repulsion, adhesion/de-adhesion and migration, thereby influencing cell fate, morphogenesis and organogenesis. During adulthood, the Eph/ephrin system continues to play roles in tissue plasticity, for example in shaping dendritic spines during neuronal plasticity. Mechanistically, Eph-ephrin repulsive behavior appears to require ligand-receptor internalization and signaling to Rho GTPases.     

Eph receptors are involved in the activity-dependent synaptic wiring in the mouse cerebellar cortex

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases are involved in many cellular processes. In the developing brain, they act as migratory and cell adhesive cues while in the adult brain they regulate dendritic spine plasticity. Here we show a new role for Eph receptor signalling in the cerebellar cortex. Cerebellar Purkinje cells are innervated by two different excitatory inputs. The climbing fibres contact the proximal dendritic domain of Purkinje cells, where synapse and spine density is low; the parallel fibres contact the distal dendritic domain, where synapse and spine density is high. Interestingly, Purkinje cells have the intrinsic ability to generate a high number of spines over their entire dendritic arborisations, which can be innervated by the parallel fibres. However, the climbing fibre input continuously exerts an activity-dependent repression on parallel fibre synapses, thus confining them to the distal Purkinje cell dendritic domain. Such repression persists after Eph receptor activation, but is overridden by Eph receptor inhibition with EphA4/Fc in neonatal cultured cerebellar slices as well as mature acute cerebellar slices, following in vivo infusion of the EphA4/Fc inhibitor and in EphB receptor-deficient mice. When electrical activity is blocked in vivo by tetrodotoxin leading to a high spine density in Purkinje cell proximal dendrites, stimulation of Eph receptor activation recapitulates the spine repressive effects of climbing fibres. These results suggest that Eph receptor signalling mediates the repression of spine proliferation induced by climbing fibre activity in Purkinje cell proximal dendrites. Such repression is necessary to maintain the correct architecture of the cerebellar cortex.     

Matrix metalloproteinase-7 disrupts dendritic spines in hippocampal neurons through NMDA receptor activation

Dendritic spines are protrusions from the dendritic shaft that host most excitatory synapses in the brain. Although they first emerge during neuronal maturation, dendritic spines remain plastic through adulthood, and recent advances in the molecular mechanisms governing spine morphology have shown them to be exquisitely sensitive to changes in the micro-environment. Among the many factors affecting spine morphology are components and regulators of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Modification of the ECM is critical to the repair of injuries throughout the body, including the CNS. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7/matrilysin is a key regulator of the ECM during pathogen infection, after nerve crush and in encephalitogenic disorders. We have investigated the effects of MMP-7 on dendritic spines in hippocampal neuron cultures and found that it induces the transformation of mature, short mushroom-shaped spines into long, thin filopodia reminiscent of immature spines. These changes were accompanied by a dramatic redistribution of F-actin from spine heads into thick, rope-like structures in the dendritic shaft. Strikingly, MMP-7 effects on dendritic spines were similar to those of NMDA treatment, and both could be blocked by channel-specific antagonists. These findings are the first direct evidence that MMPs can influence the morphology of mature dendritic spines, and hence synaptic stability.     

Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis

Excitatory synapses are formed on dendritic spines, postsynaptic structures that change during development and in response to synaptic activity. Once mature, however, spines can remain stable for many months. The molecular mechanisms that control the formation and elimination, motility and stability, and size and shape of dendritic spines are being revealed. Multiple signaling pathways, particularly those involving Rho and Ras family small GTPases, converge on the actin cytoskeleton to regulate spine morphology and dynamics bidirectionally. Numerous cell surface receptors, scaffold proteins and actin binding proteins are concentrated in spines and engaged in spine morphogenesis.     

Combinatorial morphogenesis of dendritic spines and filopodia by SPAR and α-actinin2

Rap small GTPases regulate excitatory synaptic strength and morphological plasticity of dendritic spines. Changes in spine structure are mediated by the F-actin cytoskeleton, but the link between Rap activity and actin dynamics is unclear. Here, we report a novel interaction between SPAR, a postsynaptic inhibitor of Rap, and α-actinin, a family of actin-cross-linking proteins. SPAR and α-actinin engage in bidirectional structural plasticity of dendritic spines: SPAR promotes spine head enlargement, whereas increased α-actinin2 expression favors dendritic spine elongation and thinning. Surprisingly, SPAR and α-actinin2 can function in an additive rather than antagonistic fashion at the same dendritic spine, generating combination spine/filopodia hybrids. These data identify a molecular pathway bridging the actin cytoskeleton and Rap at synapses, and suggest that formation of spines and filopodia are not necessarily opposing forms of structural plasticity.     

The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) Asef2 Promotes Dendritic Spine Formation via Rac Activation and Spinophilin-dependent Targeting

Dendritic spines are actin-rich protrusions that establish excitatory synaptic contacts with surrounding neurons. Reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton is critical for the development and plasticity of dendritic spines, which is the basis for learning and memory. Rho family GTPases are emerging as important modulators of spines and synapses, predominantly through their ability to regulate actin dynamics. Much less is known, however, about the function of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which activate these GTPases, in spine and synapse development. In this study we show that the Rho family GEF Asef2 is found at synaptic sites, where it promotes dendritic spine and synapse formation. Knockdown of endogenous Asef2 with shRNAs impairs spine and synapse formation, whereas exogenous expression of Asef2 causes an increase in spine and synapse density. This effect of Asef2 on spines and synapses is abrogated by expression of GEF activity-deficient Asef2 mutants or by knockdown of Rac, suggesting that Asef2-Rac signaling mediates spine development. Because Asef2 interacts with the F-actin-binding protein spinophilin, which localizes to spines, we investigated the role of spinophilin in Asef2-promoted spine formation. Spinophilin recruits Asef2 to spines, and knockdown of spinophilin hinders spine and synapse formation in Asef2-expressing neurons. Furthermore, inhibition of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDA) activity blocks spinophilin-mediated localization of Asef2 to spines. These results collectively point to spinophilin-Asef2-Rac signaling as a novel mechanism for the development of dendritic spines and synapses.     

Structure and molecular organization of dendritic spines

Dendritic spines mediate most excitatory synapses in the CNS and are therefore likely to be of major importance for neural processing. We review the structural aspects of dendritic spines, with particular emphasis on recent advances in the characterization of their molecular components. Spine morphology is very diverse and spine size is correlated with the strength of the synaptic transmission. In addition, the spine neck biochemically isolates individual synapses. Therefore, spine morphology directly reflects its function. A large number of molecules have been described in spines, involving several biochemical families. Considering the small size of a spine, the variety of molecules found is astounding, suggesting that spines are paramount examples of biological nanotechnology. Single-molecular studies appear necessary for future progress. The purpose of this rich molecular diversity is still mysterious but endows synapses with a diverse and flexible biochemical machinery.     

Time-lapse imaging of dendritic spines in vitro

Dendritic spines are small protrusions present postsynaptically at approximately 90% of excitatory synapses in the brain. Spines undergo rapid spontaneous changes in shape that are thought to be important for alterations in synaptic connectivity underlying learning and memory. Visualization of these dynamic changes in spine morphology are especially challenging because of the small size of spines (approximately 1 microm). Here we describe a microscope system, based on a spinning-disk confocal microscope, suitable for imaging mature dendritic spines in brain slice preparations, with a time resolution of seconds. We discuss two commonly used in vitro brain slice preparations and methods for transfecting them. Preparation and transfection require approximately 1 d, after which slices must be cultured for at least 21 d to obtain spines of mature morphology. We also describe imaging and computer analysis routines for studying spine motility. These procedures require in the order of 2 to 4 h.