Sequence analysis and modular organization of threonyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus and its interrelation with threonyl-tRNA synthetases of other origins.

The gene encoding threonyl-tRNA synthetase (Thr-tRNA synthetase) from the extreme thermophilic eubacterium Thermus thermophilus HB8 has been cloned and sequenced. The ORF encodes a polypeptide chain of 659 amino acids (Mr 75 550) that shares strong similarities with other Thr-tRNA synthetases. Comparative analysis with the three-dimensional structure of other subclass IIa synthetases shows it to be organized into four structural modules: two N-terminal modules specific to Thr-tRNA synthetases, a catalytic core and a C-terminal anticodon-binding module. Comparison with the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli Thr-tRNA synthetase in complex with tRNAThr enabled identification of the residues involved in substrate binding and catalytic activity. Analysis by atomic absorption spectrometry of the enzyme overexpressed in E. coli revealed the presence in each monomer of one tightly bound zinc atom, which is essential for activity. Despite strong similarites in modular organization, Thr-tRNA synthetases diverge from other subclass IIa synthetases on the basis of their N-terminal extensions. The eubacterial and eukaryotic enzymes possess a large extension folded into two structural domains, N1 and N2, that are not significantly similar to the shorter extension of the archaebacterial enzymes. Investigation of a truncated Thr-tRNA synthetase demonstrated that domain N1 is not essential for tRNA charging. Thr-tRNA synthetase from T. thermophilus is of the eubacterial type, in contrast to other synthetases from this organism, which exhibit archaebacterial characteristics. Alignments show conservation of part of domain N2 in the C-terminal moiety of Ala-tRNA synthetases. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence upstream from the ORF showed the absence of both any anticodon-like stem-loop structure and a loop containing sequences complementary to the anticodon and the CCA end of tRNAThr. This means that the expression of Thr-tRNA synthetase in T. thermophilus is not regulated by the translational and trancriptional mechanisms described for E. coli thrS and Bacillus subtilis thrS and thrZ. Here we discuss our results in the context of evolution of the threonylation systems and of the position of T. thermophilus in the phylogenic tree.     

Independent genes for two threonyl-tRNA synthetases in Bacillus subtilis.

With the exception of Escherichia coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase, the genes coding for the different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in procaryotes are always unique. Here we report on the occurrence and cloning of two genes (thrSv and thrS2), both encoding functional threonyl-tRNA synthetase in Bacillus subtilis. The two proteins share only 51.5% identical residues, which makes them almost as distinct from each other as each is from E. coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase (42 and 47%). Both proteins complement an E. coli thrS mutant and effectively charge E. coli threonyl tRNA in vitro. Their genes have been mapped to 250 degrees (thrSv) and 344 degrees (thrS2) on the B. subtilis chromosome. The regulatory regions of both genes are quite complex and show structural similarities. During vegetative growth, only the thrSv gene is expressed.     

Genetic analysis of mutations causing borrelidin resistance by overproduction of threonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase.

Mutations leading to borrelidin resistance in Escherichia coli by overproduction of threonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase were anaylzed genetically. The regulatory mutations were closely linked to the treonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase structural gene (thrS), located clockwise to it. The mutation that causes the threefold-increased enzyme level was more distant from thrS than the mutation responsible for the ninefold overproduction. Both mutations were cis dominant in merodiploid strains, indicating that they affected promoter-operator-like control elements. Overproduction was restricted to threonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase and was not observed for the products of genes neighboring thrS (e.g., infC, pheS, pheT, and argS), providing evidence that thrS is transcribed singly and that gene amplificationis not a likely basis for increased thrS experession.     

Autogenous repression of Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase expression in vitro

Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase (EC 6.1.1.3) expression has been examined in an acellular protein-synthesizing system programmed with a plasmid DNA carrying thrS, infC, pheS, and pheT, the gene for threonyl-tRNA synthetase, initiation factor 3, and the two protomers of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (EC 6.1.1.20), respectively. The initial rate of synthesis of L-[35S]methionine-labeled threonyl-tRNA synthetase is markedly reduced by the addition of homogeneous RNase-free threonyl-tRNA synthetase to the assay, not by that of phenylanyl- or tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (EC 6.1.1.1). The inhibition is 50% in the presence of 0.25 microM threonyl-tRNA synthetase and reaches 90% with 2 microM enzyme. Synthesis of mRNA in the acellular DNA-dependent protein-synthesizing system has been measured by molecular hybridization to gene-specific lambda DNA probes corresponding to thrS, pheS, and pheT. The addition to the assay of 2 microM threonyl-tRNA synthetase does not affect the extent of mRNA hybridizing to the thrS-specific DNA probe. This result is interpreted as reflecting an effect of the synthetase on its expression at the translational level. Analysis of the DNA sequence of the thrS gene predicts several potential secondary structures capable of forming in the thrS mRNA. One of these potential structures is a cloverleaf. The possible role of such structures in controlling expression of thrS is discussed.     

Autogenous control of Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase expression in vivo

The regulation of the expression of thrS, the structural gene for threonyl-tRNA synthetase, was studied using several thrS-lac fusions cloned in lambda and integrated as single copies at att lambda. It is first shown that the level of beta-galactosidase synthesized from a thrS-lac protein fusion is increased when the chromosomal copy of thrS is mutated. It is also shown that the level of beta-galactosidase synthesized from the same protein fusion is decreased if wild-type threonyl-tRNA synthetase is overproduced from a thrS-carrying plasmid. These results strongly indicate that threonyl-tRNA synthetase controls the expression of its own gene. Consistent with this hypothesis it is shown that some thrS mutants overproduce a modified form of threonyl-tRNA synthetase. When the thrS-lac protein fusion is replaced by several types of thrS-lac operon fusions no effect of the chromosomal thrS allele on beta-galactosidase synthesis is observed. It is also shown that beta-galactosidase synthesis from a promoter-proximal thrS-lac operon fusion is not repressed by threonyl-tRNA synthetase overproduction. The fact that regulation is seen with a thrS-lac protein fusion and not with operon fusions indicates that thrS expression is autoregulated at the translational level. This is confirmed by hybridization experiments which show that under conditions where beta-galactosidase synthesis from a thrS-lac protein fusion is derepressed three- to fivefold, lac messenger RNA is only slightly increased.     

The Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase gene contains a split ribosomal binding site interrupted by a hairpin structure that is essential for autoregulation

The expression of the gene encoding Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) is negatively autoregulated at the translational level. ThrRS binds to its own mRNA leader, which consists of four structural and functional domains: the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence and the initiation codon region (domain 1); two upstream hairpins (domains 2 and 4) connected by a single-stranded region (domain 3). Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches, we show here that the ribosome binds to thrS mRNA at two non-contiguous sites: region −12 to +16 comprising the SD sequence and the AUG codon and, unexpectedly, an upstream single-stranded sequence in domain 3. These two regions are brought into close proximity by a 38-nucleotide-long hairpin structure (domain 2). This domain, although adjacent to the 5' edge of the SD sequence, does not inhibit ribosome binding as long as the single-stranded region of domain 3 is present. A stretch of unpaired nucleotides in domain 3, but not a specific sequence, is required for efficient translation. As the repressor and the ribosome bind to interspersed domains, the competition between ThrRS and ribosome for thrS mRNA binding can be explained by steric hindrance.     

Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase operon: transcription studies of wild-type and mutated operons on multicopy plasmids

The construction of three lambda bacteriophages containing parts of the structural gene for threonyl-tRNA synthetase, thrS, and those for the two subunits of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases, pheS and pheT, is described. These phages were used as hybridization probes to measure the in vivo levels of mRNA specific to these three genes. Plasmid pB1 carries the three genes thrS, pheS, and pheT, and strains carrying the plasmid show enhanced levels of mRNA corresponding to these genes. Although the steady-state levels of threonyl-tRNA synthetase and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase produced by the presence of the plasmid differed by a factor of 10, their pulse-labeled mRNA levels were about the same. Mutant derivatives of pB1 were also analyzed. Firstly, a cis-acting insertion located before the structural genes for phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase caused a major decrease in both pheS and pheT mRNA. Secondly, mutations affecting either structural gene pheS or pheT caused a reduction in the mRNA levels for both pheS and pheT. This observation suggests that autoregulation plays a role in the expression of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase.     

Domains of the Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase translational operator and their relation to threonine tRNA isoacceptors.

The expression of the gene for threonyl-tRNA synthetase (thrS) is negatively autoregulated at the translational level in Escherichia coli. The synthetase binds to a region of the thrS leader mRNA upstream from the ribosomal binding site inhibiting subsequent translation. The leader mRNA consists of four structural domains. The present work shows that mutations in these four domains affect expression and/or regulation in different ways. Domain 1, the 3' end of the leader, contains the ribosomal binding site, which appears not to be essential for synthetase binding. Mutations in this domain probably affect regulation by changing the competition between the ribosome and the synthetase for binding to the leader. Domain 2, 3' from the ribosomal binding site, is a stem and loop with structural similarities to the tRNA(Thr) anticodon arm. In tRNAs the anticodon loop is seven nucleotides long, mutations that increase or decrease the length of the anticodon-like loop of domain 2 from seven nucleotides abolish control. The nucleotides in the second and third positions of the anticodon-like sequence are essential for recognition and the nucleotide in the wobble position is not, again like tRNA(Thr). The effect of mutations in domain 3 indicate that it acts as an articulation between domains 2 and 4. Domain 4 is a stable arm that has similarities to the acceptor arm of tRNA(Thr) and is shown to be necessary for regulation. Based on this mutational analysis and previous footprinting experiments, it appears that domains 2 and 4, those analogous to tRNA(Thr), are involved in binding the synthetase which inhibits translation probably by interfering with ribosome loading at the nearby translation initiation site.     

The relationship between translational control and mRNA degradation for the Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase gene.

Expression of thrS, the gene encoding Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase, is negatively autoregulated at the translational level. Regulation is due to the binding of threonyl-tRNA synthetase to its own mRNA at a site called the operator, located immediately upstream of the initiation codon. The present work investigates the relationship between regulation and mRNA degradation. We show that two regulatory mutations, which increase thrS expression, cause an increase in the steady-state mRNA concentration. Unexpectedly, however, the half-life of thrS mRNA in the derepressed mutants is equal to that of the wild-type, indicating that mRNA stability is independent of the repression level. All our results can be explained if one assumes that thrS mRNA is either fully translated or immediately degraded. The immediately degraded RNAs are never detected due to their extremely short half-lives, while the fully translated messengers share the same half-lives, irrespective of the mutations. The increase in the steady-state level of thrS mRNA in the derepressed mutants is simply explained by an increase in the population of translated molecules, i.e. those never bound by the repressor, ThrRS. Despite this peculiarity, thrS mRNA degradation seems to follow the classical degradation pathway. Its stability is increased in a strain defective for RNase E, indicating that an endonucleolytic cleavage by this enzyme is the rate-limiting process in degradation. We also observe an accumulation of small fragments corresponding to the 5' end of the message in a strain defective for polynucleotide phosphorylase, indicating that, following the endonucleolytic cleavages, fragments are normally degraded by 3' to 5' exonucleolytic trimming. Although mRNA degradation was suspected to increase the efficiency of translational control based on several considerations, our results indicate that inhibition of mRNA degradation has no effect on the level of repression by ThrRS.     

ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR MUTANTS OF CHLAMYDOMONAS DEFICIENT IN THE ACCUMULATION OF SPECIFIC CHLOROPLAST RNAS

Bioluminescence is broadly distributed in marine dinoflagellates and has been intensively studied in Lingulodinium ( Gonyaulax ) polyedra. In this species, bioluminescence is regulated in a circadian fashion; the enzyme (luciferase) and the luciferin (substrate)-binding protein are synthesized and degraded on a daily basis. Synthesis of both proteins is regulated at the level of translation. The L. polyedra luciferase gene is composed of three contiguous domains that are greater than 75% identical at the nucleic acid level. Possible explanations for the high degree of sequence conservation include: (1) the domains evolved through a recent duplication event; (2) the sequence similarity is maintained by a molecular process such as gene conversion; or (3) there is a functional role associated with the primary nucleic acid sequence, such as in the translational regulation of luciferase expression. The phylogenetic relationship of dinoflagellates predicted from 18S rDNA genes provides a framework for examining the molecular evolution of the regulation of luciferase expression and of genes encoding luciferase and the luciferin-binding protein. In particular, we are examining the evolution of the circadian rhythm of bioluminescence and of luciferase abundance, the presence/absence of the luciferin-binding protein, and the molecular structure of the luciferase gene. We anticipate that this approach will distinguish between regions of the luciferase molecule that are conserved for enzyme function versus those concerned with the regulation of protein expression. In addition, it will provide insight into the evolution of the regulatory processes and pathways.     

Threonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase and the regulation of the threonine operon in Escherichia coli.

Two threonine-requiring mutants with derepressed expression of the threonine operon were isolated from an Escherichia coli K-12 strain containing two copies of the thr operon. One of them carries a leaky mutation in ilvA (the structural gene for threonine deaminase), which creates an isoleucine limitation and therefore derepression of the thr operon. In the second mutant, the enzymes of the thr operon were not repressed by threonine plus isoleucine; the threonyl-transfer ribonucleic acid(tRNA) synthetase from this mutant shows an apparent Km for threonine 200-fold higher than that of the parental strain. The gene, called thrS, coding for threonyl-tRNA synthetase was located around 30 min on the E. coli map. The regulatory properties of this mutant imply the involvement of charged threonyl-tRNA or threonyl-tRNA synthetase in the regulation of the thr operon.     

EVOLUTION OF BIOLUMINESCENCE IN MARINE DINOFLAGELLATES

Bioluminescence is broadly distributed in marine dinoflagellates and has been intensively studied in Lingulodinium (Gonyaulax) polyedra. In this species, bioluminescence is regulated in a circadian fashion; the enzyme (luciferase) and the luciferin (substrate)‐binding protein are synthesized and degraded on a daily basis. Synthesis of both proteins is regulated at the level of translation. The L. polyedra luciferase gene is composed of three contiguous domains that are greater than 75% identical at the nucleic acid level. Possible explanations for the high degree of sequence conservation include: (1) the domains evolved through a recent duplication event; (2) the sequence similarity is maintained by a molecular process such as gene conversion; or (3) there is a functional role associated with the primary nucleic acid sequence, such as in the translational regulation of luciferase expression. The phylogenetic relationship of dinoflagellates predicted from 18S rDNA genes provides a framework for examining the molecular evolution of the regulation of luciferase expression and of genes encoding luciferase and the luciferin‐binding protein. In particular, we are examining the evolution of the circadian rhythm of bioluminescence and of luciferase abundance, the presence/absence of the luciferin‐binding protein, and the molecular structure of the luciferase gene. We anticipate that this approach will distinguish between regions of the luciferase molecule that are conserved for enzyme function versus those concerned with the regulation of protein expression. In addition, it will provide insight into the evolution of the regulatory processes and pathways.