The Role of the Target Membrane Structure in Fusion with Sendai Virus

Fusion between membranes of Sendai virus and liposomes or human erythrocytes ghosts was studied using an assay for lipid mixing based on the relief of self-quenching of octadecylrhodamine (R18) fluorescence. We considered only viral fusion that reflects the biological activity of the viral spike glycoproteins. The liposomes were made of phosphatidylcholine, and the effects of including cholesterol, the sialoglycolipid GD1a, and/or the sialoglycoprotein glycophorin as receptors were tested. Binding of Sendai virus to those liposomes at 37 ?C was very weak. Fusion with the erythrocyte membranes occurred at a 30-fold faster rate than with the liposomes. Experiments with biological and liposomal targets of different size indicated that size did not account for differences in fusion efficiency.     

Electrophoretic Distribution of the Proteins and Glycoproteins of Influenza Virus and Sendai Virus

The proteins of influenza (WSN) and Sendai virus have been separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis into five components. In both cases, three of these components were shown to be glycoproteins containing fucose, galactose, and glucosamine. Two protein components of each virus were probably free from these sugar residues, including the structural unit of the viral ribonucleoprotein (molecular weight of about 60,000 daltons).     

Factors Affecting Cell Fusion Induced by Sendai Virus

Cell fusion mediated by exogenous Sendai virus appears to occur in four temperature-dependent stages. The first two, which include viral adsorption, are pH dependent and can be inhibited by viral antibody. Viral envelope constituents remain detectable on the cell surface during the third stage and disappear only when cell-to-cell fusion supervenes. The relationship of these interactions to possible mechanisms of cell fusion are discussed.     

仙台病毒F基因的克隆及原核表达

目的利用原核表达系统表达仙台病毒(Sendai Virus)F蛋白主要抗原片段FP(S),并对表达产物进行免疫学初步研究。方法根据GenBank公布的仙台病毒F蛋白(gi:9627219)的基因序列设计特异性引物,通过RT-PCR扩增出F基因的主要抗原片段FP(S),插入pMD-18-T载体中,鉴定正确后克隆入pQE31原核表达载体中,将鉴定正确的pQE31-FP(S)转化大肠埃希菌M15,IPTG诱导表达,对大肠埃希菌裂解物进行SDS-PAGE和Western-blot验证。结果大肠埃希菌表达的FP(S)相对分子质量约26×103,与预期相符;能与SeV阳性血清发生特异性反应,出现单一条带。结论原核表达的FP(S)蛋白有良好的抗原性,为检测仙台病毒抗体的ELISA检测方法的研究奠定了基础。     

Fusion of Erythrocytes by Sendai Virus Studied by Immuno-Freeze-Etching

Extensive fusion of human erythrocytes agglutinated by Sendai virus was observed after 30 s of incubation at 37 C. Electron microscopy of thin sections failed to reveal the presence of virions, viral fragments, or discrete viral antigens reactive with ferritin-labeled antibody at the sites of fusion. Immuno-freezeetching of membrane surfaces demonstrated the dispersal of viral envelope antigens from what appeared to be original sites of viral attachment. Virus-induced clustering of membrane glycoproteins was interpreted as resulting from interaction of viral antigens with membrane receptor proteins and forming the structural basis for fusion of membranes with one another.     

Intergenotypic Replacement of Lyssavirus Matrix Proteins Demonstrates the Role of Lyssavirus M Proteins in Intracellular Virus Accumulation

Lyssavirus assembly depends on the matrix protein (M). We compared lyssavirus M proteins from different genotypes for their ability to support assembly and egress of genotype 1 rabies virus (RABV). Transcomplementation of M-deficient RABV with M from European bat lyssavirus (EBLV) types 1 and 2 reduced the release of infectious virus. Stable introduction of the heterogenotypic M proteins into RABV led to chimeric viruses with reduced virus release and intracellular accumulation of virus genomes. Although the chimeras indicated genotype-specific evolution of M, rapid selection of a compensatory mutant suggested conserved mechanisms of lyssavirus assembly and the requirement for only few adaptive mutations to fit the heterogenotypic M to a RABV backbone. Whereas the compensatory mutant replicated to similar infectious titers as RABV M-expressing virus, ultrastructural analysis revealed that both nonadapted EBLV M chimeras and the compensatory mutant differed from RABV M expressing viruses in the lack of intracellular viruslike structures that are enveloped and accumulate in cisterna of the degranulated and dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Moreover, all viruses were able to bud at the plasma membrane. Since the lack of the intracellular viruslike structures correlated with the type of M protein but not with the efficiency of virus release, we hypothesize that the M proteins of EBLV-1 and RABV differ in their target membranes for virus assembly. Although the biological function of intracellular assembly and accumulation of viruslike structures in the endoplasmic reticulum remain unclear, the observed differences could contribute to diverse host tropism or pathogenicity.Rabies virus (RABV) and rabies-related rhabdoviruses are classified to the lyssavirus genus (13). Among the lyssaviruses various genotypes have evolved with differences in host species tropism and pathogenicity. For instance, members of genotype 1 rabies viruses circulate in terrestrial mammals and in bats, whereas members of other genotypes, such as genotypes 5 and 6 (European bat lyssavirus types 1 and 2 [EBLV-1 and ELBV-2]), are mainly restricted to bats. Although EBLVs appear adapted to their bat reservoir hosts, they have retained the ability to infect terrestrial mammals including humans, as indicated by occasional infection of humans and terrestrial animals such as sheep, stone marten, or cats (9, 35, 42). These are typically dead end infections with no further spread in the new host species. Experimental infection of sheep indicated that EBLVs are less pathogenic than genotype 1 viruses in the heterologous host (1, 7, 46, 47).Although the replication potentials of various lyssaviruses appear different in a given host, the genome organization is highly conserved (11, 27), containing only five virus genes that are sequentially ordered as individual cistrons. Whereas the viral nucleoprotein N, phosphoprotein P, and large polymerase L are essential for RNA synthesis (8), the envelope components matrix protein M and glycoprotein G are required for virus release and virus infectivity, respectively (31, 32).Based on receptor binding and the apoptosis-inducing properties of the sole RABV surface antigen G, G protein has been designated as the major pathogenicity determinant of genotype 1 lyssaviruses (15, 33, 34). However, several examples for G-independent mechanisms of virus-cell interaction exist (2, 3, 6, 30, 41, 44, 45), some of which have been shown to be involved in escape from antiviral innate immune responses and to be important for virus replication in vivo.One viral protein that has been noticed as an important RABV pathogenicity determinant is the matrix protein M (12, 39). M is essential for virus assembly and release (32) and is able to support virus budding even in the absence of G (31). In addition, RABV M regulates viral RNA synthesis (14, 17) and has been described to contribute to TRAIL-dependent induction of apoptosis (25) and to mitochondrial dysfunction (18). Recently, the X-ray crystal structure analysis of M of genotype 2 Lagos bat lyssavirus demonstrated a high conservation of M structures within the rhabdovirus family, despite the lack of sequence conservation between the lyssavirus and vesiculovirus genera (19).With 92.3% identity, the amino acid sequences of lyssavirus M proteins are highly conserved within the lyssavirus genus (11) but also contain differences that either may reflect intragenotypic coevolution with other virus proteins or divergence caused by different host adaptation and/or pathogenicity. To analyze the compatibility of M proteins from bat lyssaviruses in a rabies virus genetic background, we tested the ability of EBLV M proteins to support RABV replication after transient complementation and in chimeric viruses. Replacement of RABV M with EBLV-1 M resulted in a strong decrease in infectious virus production, suggesting the presence of a rather high degree of genotype-specific constraints. Surprisingly, recovery of efficiently replicating virus was achieved after only three passages, indicating that minor changes in M or M-interacting proteins may restore full budding activity in the genotype 1 context. Moreover, none of the chimeric viruses, neither the inefficiently released chimeric viruses nor the efficiently released passaged mutant, was able to support intracytoplasmic budding of viruslike structures at membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER). Intracellular accumulation of enveloped viruslike structures in the rER is a common phenomenon of several rabies and rabies-related viruses (36, 37) that was obviously lost in the chimeric viruses. The lack of intracellular virus assembly strongly suggests that EBLV-1 and RABV M differ in their cellular target membranes for virus assembly and budding.     

Mumps Virus Matrix,Fusion, and Nucleocapsid Proteins Cooperate for Efficient Production of Virus-Like Particles

Paramyxovirus particles, like other enveloped virus particles, are formed by budding from membranes of infected cells. To define mumps virus (MuV) proteins important for this process, viral proteins were expressed either singly or in combination in mammalian cells to produce virus-like particles (VLPs). Only the MuV matrix (M) protein when expressed by itself was capable of inducing particle release, but the quantity of these M-alone particles was very small. Efficient production of mumps VLPs occurred only when the M protein was coexpressed together with other viral proteins, with maximum production achieved upon coexpression of the viral M, nucleocapsid (NP), and fusion (F) proteins together. Electron microscopy analysis confirmed that VLPs were morphologically similar to MuV virions. The two MuV glycoproteins were not equal contributors to particle formation. The F protein was a major contributor to VLP production, while the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein made a smaller contribution. Evidence for the involvement of class E protein machinery in VLP budding was obtained, with mumps VLP production inhibited upon expression of dominant-negative versions of the class E proteins Vps4A and Chmp4b. Disruption of the sequence 24-FPVI-27 within the MuV M protein led to poor VLP production, consistent with findings of earlier studies of a related sequence, FPIV, important for the budding of parainfluenza virus 5. Together, these results demonstrate that different MuV structural proteins cooperate together for efficient particle production and that particle budding likely involves host class E protein machinery.Mumps virus (MuV) is a paramyxovirus from the Rubulavirus genus. Prior to mass vaccination, mumps was a very common childhood illness, with characteristic symptoms including fever, fatigue, and inflammation of the salivary glands. Less frequently, MuV infection results in serious complications including aseptic meningitis and encephalitis (22). Significant outbreaks of mumps have occurred recently in the United Kingdom (6), Canada (40), and the United States (7, 14), highlighting the continued relevance of this disease even in countries where vaccination is widespread. Like other paramyxoviruses, MuV possesses a genome that consists of single-stranded negative-sense RNA, encapsidated by a nucleocapsid (NP) protein and associated with an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex composed of large protein and phosphoprotein subunits. This core is linked to the virion membrane by matrix (M) protein. The outer surface of the virion is covered with glycoprotein spikes consisting of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein, which binds sialic acid to allow virion attachment to cells, and fusion (F) protein, which induces viral and cellular membranes to fuse together during virus entry. Additional components of MuV include the small hydrophobic protein, which prevents infected cells from undergoing apoptosis (67), and V protein, which prevents induction of interferon-induced antiviral responses (29, 30, 62). The late steps of the MuV life cycle that allow for assembly and budding of MuV virions remain for the most part unexplored.Enveloped virus particles are formed by budding from cellular membranes at specific locations at which viral proteins, and often host factors, have assembled together. For the negative-strand RNA viruses, coordination among the different viral components during virus assembly appears to be directed by the viral matrix proteins, which have the potential to interact with the cytoplasmic tails of the viral glycoproteins and with viral ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) in the cytoplasms of infected cells. M proteins likely assemble as layers beneath the plasma membranes of infected cells and induce other viral components to gather at these locations, from which virus budding occurs (reviewed in references 49 and 57).For many viruses, it has been possible to achieve assembly and budding of particles from cells that have been transfected to produce one or more viral proteins in the absence of virus infection. These particles often resemble virions morphologically and have been termed virus-like particles (VLPs). VLP production provides a useful means for determining the individual roles of different virus proteins in particle formation, and in some cases the VLPs themselves have shown promise as vaccines (45). For most negative-strand RNA viruses, VLP formation is critically dependent on the presence of the viral matrix proteins (49). Indeed, in the cases of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) (37) and Nipah virus (11, 38), M protein expression is sufficient for highly efficient VLP production, with no apparent need for assistance from any of the other viral structural components, such as the viral glycoproteins or NP proteins. In the case of NDV, incorporation of glycoproteins and NP proteins into the budding VLPs requires specific interactions involving the M protein, but these interactions do not appear to facilitate the budding process itself (37).Although expression of viral matrix protein is sufficient for robust VLP production in the above cases, it has long been thought that additional viral components are also important for efficient budding of many negative-strand RNA viruses. For example, an important role for viral glycoproteins in virus assembly has been established based on studies with recombinant viruses that contain glycoproteins lacking their cytoplasmic tails (4, 17, 26, 34, 35, 48, 52, 66) and analyses of assembly-defective subacute sclerosing panencephalitis measles virus strains (5, 47). In fact, recent evidence suggests that for influenza virus it is the viral glycoproteins (and not viral matrix protein) that are the main drivers of virus budding (9). For other negative-strand RNA viruses, expression of viral glycoproteins together with matrix proteins in some cases significantly enhances the efficiency of VLP release. Ebola VLPs (31), Sendai VLPs (55, 56), and parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-like particles (51) are all produced more efficiently in the presence of viral glycoprotein expression. Ebola virus glycoprotein in some cell types functions during virus release to inhibit the action of tetherin, a cellular protein which functions to prevent the release of enveloped virus particles from infected cells (28). In addition to the viral glycoproteins, other viral components can also enhance the production of VLPs. Production of Ebola VLPs and PIV5-like particles can be further enhanced through expression of the corresponding NP proteins (31, 51), and Sendai VLP production is enhanced through expression of Sendai virus C protein (55). Hence, for these viruses, multiple proteins cooperate with one another to achieve maximum VLP production. The extent to which particle formation actually requires this cooperation differs, however. In the case of PIV5, it is absolutely essential; expression of the M protein alone does not lead to VLP production (51). On the other hand, cooperation among viral proteins is beneficial but not strictly required for the production of Sendai or Ebola VLPs, since expression of the matrix proteins of these viruses is sufficient for VLP production (20, 55, 56, 61).The late steps of negative-strand RNA virus budding may occur in a way that is analogous to the budding of retroviruses, which employ protein-protein interaction domains called late domains to manipulate host machinery and allow release of virus particles (reviewed in references 1 and 3). Cellular factors recruited by late domains in many cases are class E proteins that are part of the vacuolar protein sorting (Vps) pathway of the cell. Indeed, disruption of the Vps pathway through expression of dominant-negative (DN) versions of the Vps4 ATPase protein blocks the budding of many retroviruses (reviewed in reference 1), as well as the budding of Ebola virus (32), Lassa fever virus (63), and PIV5 (50). However, other negative-strand RNA viruses, such as influenza virus, bud particles in ways that are not substantially affected by disruption of the cellular Vps pathway (reviewed in reference 8).Here, experiments are described which define MuV proteins important for the assembly and budding of VLPs. Using proteins derived from the 88-1961 wild-type (wt) strain of MuV, optimal production of mumps VLPs is shown to occur upon coexpression of the MuV M, F, and NP proteins together in transiently transfected mammalian cells. Evidence is also provided that supports a role for cellular class E protein machinery in the budding of mumps VLPs.     

Conditions for Copackaging Rous Sarcoma Virus and Murine Leukemia Virus Gag Proteins during Retroviral Budding

Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) and murine leukemia virus (MLV) are examples of distantly related retroviruses that normally do not encounter one another in nature. Their Gag proteins direct particle assembly at the plasma membrane but possess very little sequence similarity. As expected, coexpression of these two Gag proteins did not result in particles that contain both. However, when the N-terminal membrane-binding domain of each molecule was replaced with that of the Src oncoprotein, which is also targeted to the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane, efficient copackaging was observed in genetic complementation and coimmunoprecipitation assays. We hypothesize that the RSV and MLV Gag proteins normally use distinct locations on the plasma membrane for particle assembly but otherwise have assembly domains that are sufficiently similar in function (but not sequence) to allow heterologous interactions when these proteins are redirected to a common membrane location.     

Sendai Virus Fusion Activity as Modulated by Target Membrane Components

We have studied the differences between erythrocytes and erythrocyte ghosts as target membranes for the study of Sendai virus fusion activity. Fusion was monitored continuously by fluorescence dequenching of R18-labeled virus. Experiments were carried out either with or without virus/target membrane prebinding. When Sendai virus was added directly to a erythrocyte/erythrocyte ghost suspension, fusion was always lower than that obtained when experiments were carried out with virus already bound to the erythrocyte/erythrocyte ghost in the cold, since with virus prebinding fusion can be triggered more rapidly. Although virus binding to both erythrocytes and erythrocyte ghosts was similar, fusion activity was much more pronounced when erythrocyte ghosts were used as target membranes. These observations indicate that intact erythrocytes and erythrocyte ghosts are not equivalent as target membranes for the study of Sendai virus fusion activity. Fusion of Sendai virus with both target membranes was inhibited when erythrocytes or erythrocyte ghosts were pretreated with proteinase K, suggesting a role of target membrane proteins in this process. Treatment of both target membranes with neuraminidase, which removes sialic acid residues (the biological receptors for Sendai virus) greatly reduced viral binding. Interestingly, this treatment had no significant effect on the fusion reaction itself.     

Effect of N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine on the Membrane Fusion Between Sendai Virus and Liposome

We have compared the properties of two N-acyl derivatives of dilauryl phosphatidylethanolamine on lipid polymorphism, vesicle leakage and Sendai virus fusion. The derivatives contained either an N-lauroyl group (NLPE) or an N-acetyl group (NAcPE). Only the NAcPE markedly affected the bilayer to hexagonal transition temperature of dielaidoyl phosphatidylethanolamine, shifting it to higher values. In contrast the NLPE slightly lowered this phase transition temperature. The two lipids also have opposite effects on leakage from small unilamellar vesicles of egg phosphatidylcholine. The NLPE inhibits leakage, while the NAcPE promotes it. This vesicle stabilizing effect of NLPE against leakage is not manifested in alterations of rates or extents of Sendai virus fusion to liposomes of egg phosphatidylethanolamine plus 2% ganglioside G_D1a. The NLPE has no effect, while the NAcPE reduces the observed fusion, at least in part as a consequence of a reduction in the final extent of fusion. These results demonstrate that the bilayer stabilizing effects of NLPE do not result in a lower rate of viral fusion. Furthermore, these bilayer stabilizing effects against leakage are not solely a function of the lipid headgroup but also require a structure with three long acyl chains. The reduced leakage is not related to a loss in monolayer curvature strain.     

Proteins and Glycoproteins of Paramyxoviruses: a Comparison of Simian Virus 5, Newcastle Disease Virus, and Sendai Virus

The polypeptides of three paramyxoviruses (simian virus 5, Newcastle disease virus, and Sendai virus) were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Glycoproteins were identified by the use of radioactive glucosamine as a carbohydrate precursor. The protein patterns reveal similarities among the three viruses. Each virus contains at least five or six proteins, two of which are glycoproteins. Four of the proteins found in each virus share common features with corresponding proteins in the other two viruses, including similar molecular weights. These four proteins are the nucleocapsid protein (molecular weight 56,000 to 61,000), a larger glycoprotein (molecular weight 65,000 to 74,000), a smaller glycoprotein (molecular weight 53,000 to 56,000), and a major protein which is the smallest protein in each virion (molecular weight 38,000 to 41,000).     

Sendai Virus C Proteins Counteract the Interferon-Mediated Induction of an Antiviral State

We have studied the relationship between the Sendai virus (SeV) C proteins (a nested set of four proteins initiated at different start codons) and the interferon (IFN)-mediated antiviral response in IFN-competent cells in culture. SeV strains containing wild-type or various mutant C proteins were examined for their ability (i) to induce an antiviral state (i.e., to prevent the growth of vesicular stomatitis virus [VSV] following a period of SeV infection), (ii) to induce the elevation of Stat1 protein levels, and (iii) to prevent IFN added concomitant with the SeV infection from inducing an antiviral state. We find that expression of the wild-type C gene and, specifically, the AUG114-initiated C protein prevents the establishment of an antiviral state: i.e., cells infected with wild-type SeV exhibited little or no increase in Stat1 levels and were permissive for VSV replication, even in the presence of exogenous IFN. In contrast, in cells infected with SeV lacking the AUG114-initiated C protein or containing a single amino acid substitution in the C protein, the level of Stat1 increased and VSV replication was inhibited. The prevention of the cellular IFN-mediated antiviral response appears to be a key determinant of SeV pathogenicity.     

Differences in Dispersion of Influenza Virus Lipids and Proteins during Fusion

Digitally enhanced low-light-level fluorescence video microscopy and immunochemical staining were used to examine influenza virus envelope lipid and protein redistribution during pH-induced fusion. Video microscopy was performed using viruses labeled with either the lipid analogue octadecylrhodamine B (R18) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) covalently linked to envelope proteins. Viruses were bound to human red blood cells, and the pattern and intensity of fluorescence were monitored for 30 min while cell-virus complexes were perfused with pH 7.4 or 4.8 media at temperatures either above or below 20°C. R18 showed complete redistribution and dequenching by 30 min at all incubation temperatures, confirming reports that viral fusion occurs at subphysiological temperatures. FITC-labeled protein showed spatial redistribution at 28°C but no change at low temperature. Electron microscopy observations of immunochemical staining of viral proteins confirmed both that protein redistribution at 37°C was slower than R18 and the failure of movement within 30 min at 16°C. Video microscopy monitoring of RNA staining by acridine orange of virus-cell complexes showed redistribution to the RBCs at all temperatures but only after low pH-induced fusion. The results are consistent with differential dispersion of viral components into the RBC and the existence of relatively long-lived barriers to diffusion subsequent to fusion pore formation.