Role of nitric oxide in the gastrointestinal tract

Worldwide osteoarthritis (OA) affects more than 9.6% of men and 18% of women older that 60 years. Treatment for OA often requires chronic use of selective or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which have been associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications. An increased risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding with NSAIDs alone and when combined with low-dose aspirin has been described in numerous studies. Although cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors have been shown to carry a lower risk for gastrointestinal injury than nonselective NSAIDs, research continues to identify new treatments that not only are effective but also provide an improved benefit/risk profile, including better gastrointestinal tolerability. Nitric oxide (NO) is known to have a protective effect on the gastrointestinal tract. In preclinical studies NO was shown to help maintain gastric mucosal integrity, to inhibit leukocyte adherence to the endothelium, and to repair NSAID-induced damage. In addition, epidemiologic studies have shown that the use of NO-donating agents with NSAIDs or aspirin resulted in reduced risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Recent studies have shown that cyclo-oxygenase inhibiting NO-donating drugs (CINODs), in which a NO molecule is chemically linked to an NSAID, are effective anti-inflammatory agents and may result in less gastrointestinal damage than is associated with NSAID use. Therefore, these agents provide a potential therapeutic option for patients with arthritis who require long-term NSAID therapy.     

Gastric-sparing nitric oxide-releasable ‘true’ prodrugs of aspirin and naproxen

Nitric oxide-releasing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NO-NSAIDs) are gaining attention as potentially gastric-sparing NSAIDs. Herein, we report a novel class of ‘1-(nitrooxy)ethyl ester’ group-containing NSAIDS as efficient NO releasing ‘true’ prodrugs of aspirin and naproxen. While an aspirin prodrug exhibited comparable oral bioavailability and antiplatelet activity (i.e., TXB₂ inhibition) to those of aspirin, a naproxen prodrug exhibited better bioavailability than naproxen. These promising NO-NSAIDs protected experimental rats from gastric damage. We therefore believe that these promising NO-NSAIDs could represent a new class of potentially ‘Safe NSAIDs’ for the treatment of arthritic pain, inflammation and cardiovascular disorders in the case of NO-aspirin.     

Gastric mucosal cell model for estimating relative gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The study objective was to characterize the AGS human gastric mucosal cell line as a model for estimating gastrointestinal toxicity of COX-inhibiting compounds. Rofecoxib, celecoxib, nimesulide, ibuprofen, indomethacin, aspirin, salicylic acid, naproxen and acetaminophen were tested for inhibition of COX-2-mediated prostaglandin E2 synthesis in A549 and AGS cells. The IC50 ratio AGS/A549 was calculated as an estimate of the therapeutic index (TI) for gastrointestinal toxicity. Calculated IC50 values of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in A549 cells were in excellent agreement with published values (r = 0.996; P < 0.005). Calcium ionophore induction of arachidonic acid release in AGS cells provided TI similar to those using platelets and A549 cells (r = 0.918; P < 0.01). The AGS/A549 model exhibited lower TI than the platelet/A549 model. Spearman ranking correlated clinical NSAID gastropathy with lower AGS TI values. The AGS cell line has excellent potential to serve as a model for assessing the gastrointestinal effects of COX-inhibiting compounds.     

COX-2: Where are we in 2003? - Be strong and resolute: continue to use COX-2 selective inhibitors at recommended dosages in appropriate patients

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors have been shown to have comparable efficacy to nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Large outcome studies have shown that patients with OA and RA not taking low-dose aspirin have fewer symptomatic and complicated upper GI events when treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors than with nonselective NSAIDs. When used in recommended dosages, there is no convincing evidence that patients treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors have an increased incidence of cardiovascular thrombotic events, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, than patients treated with either placebo or nonselective NSAIDs other than naproxen. Co-therapy with low-dose aspirin is recommended in patients with OA and RA at increased risk for cardiovascular events; the need for gastroprotective therapy in such patients is controversial.     

COX-2: Where are we in 2003? - Be strong and resolute: continue to use COX-2 selective inhibitors at recommended dosages in appropriate patients

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors have been shown to have comparable efficacy to nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Large outcome studies have shown that patients with OA and RA not taking low-dose aspirin have fewer symptomatic and complicated upper GI events when treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors than with nonselective NSAIDs. When used in recommended dosages, there is no convincing evidence that patients treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors have an increased incidence of cardiovascular thrombotic events, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, than patients treated with either placebo or nonselective NSAIDs other than naproxen. Co-therapy with low-dose aspirin is recommended in patients with OA and RA at increased risk for cardiovascular events; the need for gastroprotective therapy in such patients is controversial.     

Cyclooxygenase-2 selective and nitric oxide-releasing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastric mucosal responses.

Occurrence of gastrointestinal damage and delayed healing of pre-existing ulcer are commonly observed in association with clinical use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We examined the effects of NS-398, the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, and nitric oxide (NO)- releasing aspirin (NCX-4016) on gastric mucosal ulcerogenic and healing responses in experimental animals, in comparison with those of nonselective COX inhibitors such as indomethacin and aspirin. Indomethacin and aspirin given orally were ulcerogenic by themselves in rat stomachs, while either NS-398 or NCX-4016 was not ulcerogenic at the doses which exert the equipotent antiinflammatory action with indomethacin or aspirin. Among these NSAIDs, only NCX-4016 showed a dose-dependent protection against gastric lesions induced by HCl/ethanol in rats. On the other hand, the healing of gastric ulcers induced in mice by thermal-cauterization was significantly delayed by repeated administration of these NSAIDs for more than 7 days, except NCX-4016. Gastric mucosal prostaglandin contents were reduced by indomethacin, aspirin and NCX-4016 in both normal and ulcerated mucosa, while NS-398 significantly decreased prostaglandin generation only in the ulcerated mucosa. Oral administration of NCX-4016 in pylorus-ligated rats and mice increased the levels of NO metabolites in the gastric contents. In addition, both NS-398 and NCX-4016 showed an equipotent anti-inflammatory effect against carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats as compared with indomethacin and aspirin. These results suggest that both indomethacin and aspirin are ulcerogenic by themselves and impair the healing of pre-existing gastric ulcers as well. The former action is due to inhibition of COX-1, while the latter effect may be accounted for by inhibition of COX-2 and mimicked by NS-398, the COX-2 selective NSAID. NCX-4016, despite inhibiting both COX-1 and COX-2, protects the stomach against damage and preserves the healing response of gastric ulcers, probably because of the beneficial action of NO.     

Molecular characterization of cytotoxic and resistance mechanisms induced by NCX 4040, a novel NO-NSAID, in pancreatic cancer cell lines*

Although non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to be effective as chemopreventive agents, important side-effects limit their clinical use. A promising novel class of drugs, nitric oxide-donating NSAIDs (NO-NSAIDs), has been found to be more active than classical NSAIDs. This study explored the effect of the NO-donating aspirin derivative, NCX 4040, on three human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines (Capan-2, MIA PaCa-2 and T3M4). NCX 4040 activity was compared with that of NCX 4016 (an NO₂-positional isomer of NCX 4040), SNAP (a standard NO-releasing molecule), NCX 4042 (denitrated analog of NCX 4040), and aspirin. NCX 4040 showed a striking cytocidal activity in all cell lines, already inducing significant percentages of apoptotic cells at 10 μM in Capan-2 cell lines. This study focused on the biological mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to NCX 4040, highlighting that the cytotoxic action of this drug may be due to the hyperexpression of Bax, its translocation to the mitochondria, the release of Cytochrome C, and the activation of caspases-9 and -3, overall in a p53-independent manner. Moreover, the use of a specific COX-2 inhibitor (NS 398) in the experimental models showed that COX-2 hyperexpression could partially explain the resistance mechanisms to NCX 4040. This study was supported by Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Forlì, and by the Italian, Ministry of Health, 2004.     

Proteomic analysis in NSAIDs-treated primary cardiomyocytes

NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) are widely used for the treatment of a variety of inflammatory diseases, but many of them were withdrawn from the market due to their cardiovascular toxicity. In this study, we tried to identify proteins responding to the cellular toxicity in NSAIDs-treated primarily cultured cardiomyocytes using 2-D proteomic analysis. We used seven different NSAIDs (celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and meloxicam) possessing each different degree of cardiovascular risk. Overall protein spots were similar in all NSAIDs-treated cells although numbers of decreased proteins were about 2-fold higher in celecoxib or rofecoxib-treated cells than in cells incubated with other NSAIDs. Many stress-related proteins, cardiac muscle movement proteins and proteins involved in membrane organization have been isolated. Among them, Septin-8, a filament scaffolding protein, showed its specific expression pattern depending on the extent of drug toxicity. Its expression level was low in cells treated by relatively high toxic drugs such as celecoxib, diclofenac, valdecoxib, and rofecoxib. On the contrary, Septin-8 was similarly expressed in control cells in the presence of less toxic drugs such ibuprofen, naproxen, and meloxicam. This data suggests that Septin-8 differentially responds to each NSAID.     

Cardiovascular and gastrointestinal effects of COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs: achieving a balance

Conventional 'nonselective' nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the treatment of pain and inflammation; however, the potential gastrointestinal risks associated with their use can be a cause for concern. In response to the adverse effects that can accompany nonselective NSAID use, selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors were developed to target the COX-2 isoenzyme, thus providing anti-inflammatory and analgesic benefits while theoretically sparing the gastroprotective activity of the COX-1 isoenzyme. Data from large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that the COX-2 inhibitors are associated with substantial reductions in gastrointestinal risk in the majority of patients who do not receive aspirin. However, some or all of the gastrointestinal benefit of COX-2 inhibitors may be lost in patients who receive low, cardioprotective doses of aspirin, and recent evidence suggests that some of these agents, at some doses, may be associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events compared with no therapy. The risks and benefits of conventional NSAIDs and of COX-2 inhibitors must be weighed carefully; in clinical practice many patients who might benefit from NSAID or COX-2 therapy are likely to be elderly and at relatively high risk for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events. These patients are also more likely to be taking low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis and over-the-counter NSAIDs for pain. Identifying therapies that provide relief from arthritis related symptoms, confer optimum cardioprotection, and preserve the gastrointestinal mucosa is complex. Factors to consider include the interference of certain NSAIDs with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin, differences in the adverse gastrointestinal event rates among nonselective NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors, emerging data regarding the relative risks for cardiovascular events associated with these drugs, and the feasibility and cost of co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors.     

Tolerability and adverse events in clinical trials of celecoxib in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of information from company clinical trial reports

The objective was to improve understanding of adverse events occurring with celecoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Data were extracted from company clinical trial reports of randomised trials of celecoxib in osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis lasting 2 weeks or more. Outcomes were discontinuations (all cause, lack of efficacy, adverse event, gastrointestinal adverse event), endoscopically detected ulcers, gastrointestinal or cardio-renal events, and major changes in haematological parameters. The main comparisons were celecoxib (all doses) versus placebo, paracetamol (acetaminophen) 4,000 mg daily, rofecoxib 25 mg daily, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (naproxen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and loxoprofen). For NSAIDs, celecoxib was compared both at all doses and at licensed doses (200 to 400 mg daily). Thirty-one trials included 39,605 randomised patients. Most patients had osteoarthritis and were women of average age 60 years or above. Most trials lasted 12 weeks or more. Doses of celecoxib were 50 to 800 mg/day. Compared with placebo, celecoxib had fewer discontinuations for any cause or for lack of efficacy, fewer serious adverse events, and less nausea. It had more patients with dyspepsia, diarrhoea, oedema, more adverse events that were gastrointestinal or treatment related, and more patients experiencing an adverse event. There were no differences for hypertension, gastrointestinal tolerability, or discontinuations for adverse events. Compared with paracetamol, celecoxib had fewer discontinuations for any cause, for lack of efficacy, or diarrhoea, but no other differences. Compared with rofecoxib, celecoxib had fewer patients with abdominal pain and oedema, but no other differences. Compared with NSAIDs, celecoxib had fewer symptomatic ulcers and bleeds, endoscopically detected ulcers, and discontinuations for adverse events or gastrointestinal adverse events. Fewer patients had any, or a gastrointestinal, or a treatment-related adverse event, or vomiting, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, or reduced haemoglobin or haematocrit. Discontinuations for lack of efficacy were higher. No differences were found for all-cause discontinuations, serious adverse events, hypertension, diarrhoea, nausea, oedema, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or raised creatinine. Company clinical trial reports present much more information than published papers. Adverse event information is clearly presented in company clinical trial reports, which are an ideal source of information for systematic review and meta-analysis.     

Risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control analysis

Aims To determine the comparative risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in primary care between 2000 and 2004; to determine these risks in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease and in those taking and not taking aspirin.Design Nested case-control study.Setting 367 general practices contributing to the UK QRESEARCH database and spread throughout every strategic health authority and health board in England, Wales, and Scotland.Subjects 9218 cases with a first ever diagnosis of myocardial infarction during the four year study period; 86 349 controls matched for age, calendar year, sex, and practice.Outcome measures Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for myocardial infarction associated with rofecoxib, celecoxib, naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and other selective and non-selective NSAIDS. Odds ratios were adjusted for smoking status, comorbidity, deprivation, and use of statins, aspirin, and antidepressants.Results A significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction was associated with current use of rofecoxib (adjusted odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.61) compared with no use within the previous three years; with current use of diclofenac (1.55, 1.39 to 1.72); and with current use of ibuprofen (1.24, 1.11 to 1.39). Increased risks were associated with the other selective NSAIDs, with naproxen, and with non-selective NSAIDs; these risks were significant at < 0.05 rather than < 0.01 for current use but significant at < 0.01 in the tests for trend. No significant interactions occurred between any of the NSAIDs and either aspirin or coronary heart disease.Conclusion These results suggest an increased risk of myocardial infarction associated with current use of rofecoxib, diclofenac, and ibuprofen despite adjustment for many potential confounders. No evidence was found to support a reduction in risk of myocardial infarction associated with current use of naproxen. This is an observational study and may be subject to residual confounding that cannot be fully corrected for. However, enough concerns may exist to warrant a reconsideration of the cardiovascular safety of all NSAIDs.     

Some new aspects of gastric mucosal protection and damage

Much of the research on gastric mucosal protection has concerned prostaglandins. Some of the recent studies consolidate aspects first investigated a few years ago, but whose importance is now becoming established more clearly. This short review will mention some of the more recent work demonstrating the importance of prostaglandins in preventing stasis of gastric mucosal blood flow, effects on cell senescence and exfoliation, and the protection of a severe mucosal lesion by a mucus-containing plug which facilitates healing. The leukotrienes are other substances formed in the gastric mucosa from the same precursors as the prostaglandins. Their roles are not well understood, but may include participation in gastric inflammation, and in mucosal damage by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and ethanol. The NSAIDs may damage the gastric mucosa not only by reducing the formation of protective prostaglandins, but also by increasing the metabolism of prostaglandin precursors into leukotrienes. Another factor is thromboxane A2, a substance that is damaging to the gastric mucosa but whose synthesis is inhibited by NSAIDs. The prostaglandin analogues produced for the treatment of peptic ulcer may find a major use in the protection against damage by NSAIDs. Not only may they act as 'replacement therapy' for the inhibited prostaglandins, but they protect against damage from substances that do not inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. In doses that raise the gastric pH, the prostaglandins reduce the local absorption of NSAIDs by increasing their ionisation. In rats, paracetamol protects against damage by aspirin, but whether this occurs in man is controversial. Work not previously published demonstrates that paracetamol does not affect the inhibition of prostaglandin formation by indomethacin in human isolated gastric mucosa.     

Protection by aspirin of indomethacin-induced small intestinal damage in rats: mediation by salicylic acid.

Most of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) except aspirin (ASA) produce intestinal damage in rats. In the present study, we re-examined the intestinal toxic effect of ASA in rats, in comparison with various NSAIDs, and investigated why ASA does not cause damage in the small intestine, in relation to its metabolite salicylic acid (SA). Various NSAIDs (indomethacin; 10 mg/kg; flurbiprofen; 20 mg/kg; naproxen; 40 mg/kg; dicrofenac; 40 mg/kg; ASA; 20-200 mg/kg) were administered s.c., and the small intestinal mucosa was examined macroscopically 24 h later. All NSAIDs tested, except ASA, caused hemorrhagic lesions in the small intestine, with a decrease of mucosal PGE(2) contents. ASA did not provoke any damage, despite inhibiting (prostaglandin) PG production, and prevented the occurrence of intestinal lesions induced by indomethacin, in a dose-related manner. This protective action of ASA was mimicked by the equimolar doses of SA (17.8-178 mg/kg). Indomethacin caused intestinal hypermotility, in preceding to the occurrence of lesion, and this event was followed by increases of enterobacterial translocation in the mucosa. Both ASA and SA prevented both the intestinal hypermotility and the bacterial translocation seen after indomethacin treatment. In addition, the protective effect of SA was not significantly influenced by either the adenosine deaminase or the adenosine receptor antagonists. Following administration of ASA, the blood SA levels reached a peak within 30 min and remained elevated for more than 7 h. These results suggest that SA has a cytoprotective action against indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions, and this action may be associated with inhibition of the intestinal hypermotility and the bacterial translocation, but not mediated by endogenous adenosine. Failure of ASA to induce intestinal damage may be explained, at least partly, by a protective action of SA, the metabolite of ASA.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impair oral mucosal repair by eliciting disturbances in endothelin-converting enzyme-1 and constitutive nitric oxide synthase.

Although the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is known to cause the impairment in mucosal defenses that are well recognized and clinically emphasized with respect to the gastrointestinal tract, less apparent is the extent of their interference with the repair of soft oral tissue. As the disturbances in nitric oxide generation and the release of endothelin-1 (ET-1) are the early signs of injury by NSAIDs, we investigated oral mucosal ulcer healing in the presence of NSAID administration by analyzing the expression of endothelin-converting enzyme-1(ECE-1), responsible for ET-1 generation, and the mucosal activity of inducible (NOS-2) and constitutive (cNOS) nitric oxide synthase responsible for nitric oxide production. Groups of rats with acetic-induced buccal mucosal ulcers were subjected twice daily for up to 10 days to intragastric administration of either indomethacin (5 mg/kg), aspirin (20 mg/kg), or the vehicle and their mucosal tissue subjected to macroacopic assessment of ulcer healing rate and biochemical measurements. While in the control group the ulcer healed by the tenth day, only a 57.2% reduction in the ulcer crater area was attained in the animals subjected to indomethacin and a 54.8% reduction in ulcer occurred in the presence of aspirin administration. Futhermore, by the tenth day, the delay in healing in the presence of indomethacin was manifested by a 4.9-fold higher rate of apoptosis, a 2.7-fold higher expression of ECE-1 activity, a 3.9-fold higher expression of NOS-2 activity and a 2.2-fold decline in cNOS activity, while the interference in ulcer healing by aspirin was characterized by a 5.6-fold higher rate of apoptosis, a 2.8-fold expressiom of ECE-1 activity, a 3.7-fold higher expression of NOS-2 activity and a 2.3-fold lower expression of cNOS activity. Our findings demonstrate that NSAIDs not only pose a well-known risk of gastrointestinal injury, but also interfere with soft oral tissue repair. The impairment in buccal mucosal ulcer healing by NSAID ingestion is manifested in up-regulation in the expression of ECE-1 responsible for ET-1 generation, suppression in cNOS, and amplification of apoptotic events that delay the healing process.     

Efficacy,tolerability, and upper gastrointestinal safety of celecoxib for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy, gastrointestinal safety, and tolerability of celecoxib (a cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX 2) inhibitor) used in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.DesignSystematic review of randomised trials that compared at least 12 weeks'' celecoxib treatment with another non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or placebo and reported efficacy, tolerability, or safety. Trials identified from manufacturer and by searching electronic databases and evaluated according to predefined inclusion and quality criteria. Data combined through meta-analysis.Participants15 187 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.ResultsNine randomised controlled trials were included. Celecoxib and NSAIDS were equally effective for all efficacy outcomes. Compared with those taking other NSAIDs, in patients taking celecoxib the rate of withdrawals due to adverse gastrointestinal events was 46% lower (95% confidence interval 29% to 58%; NNT 35 at three months), the incidence of ulcers detectable by endoscopy was 71% lower (59% to 79%; NNT 6 at three months), and the incidence of symptoms of ulcers, perforations, bleeds, and obstructions was 39% lower (4% to 61%; NNT 208 at six months). Subgroup analysis of patients taking aspirin showed that the incidence of ulcers detected by endoscopy was reduced by 51% (14% to 72%) in those given celecoxib compared with other NSAIDs. The reduction was greater (73%, 52% to 84%) in those not taking aspirin.ConclusionCelecoxib is as effective as other NSAIDs for relief of symptoms of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and has significantly improved gastrointestinal safety and tolerability.

What is already known on this topic

Long term NSAID use is associated with the development of peptic and duodenal ulcersCOX 2 specific inhibitors are claimed to cause fewer gastrointestinal complicationsThe National Institute for Clinical Excellence has recently recommended that COX 2 specific inhibitors are used in patients with arthritis who are at risk of gastrointestinal complications but not in those taking prophylactic aspirin

What this study adds

Systematic review of randomised trials shows that celecoxib is as effective as other NSAIDs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritisCelecoxib has significantly improved gastrointestinal safety and tolerability compared with standard NSAIDsAn improvement in gastrointestinal safety was still evident in patients who were also taking aspirin     

Differential direct effects of cyclo-oxygenase-1/2 inhibition on proteoglycan turnover of human osteoarthritic cartilage: an <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis>study

Treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diminishes inflammation along with mediators of cartilage destruction. However, NSAIDs may exert adverse direct effects on cartilage, particularly if treatment is prolonged. We therefore compared the direct effects of indomethacin, naproxen, aceclofenac and celecoxib on matrix turnover in human OA cartilage tissue. Human clinically defined OA cartilage from five different donors was exposed for 7 days in culture to indomethacin, naproxen, aceclofenac and celecoxib – agents chosen based on their cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selectivity. As a control, SC-560 (a selective COX-1 inhibitor) was used. Changes in cartilage proteoglycan turnover and prostaglandin E₂ production were determined. OA cartilage exhibited characteristic proteoglycan turnover. Indomethacin further inhibited proteoglycan synthesis; no significant effect of indomethacin on proteoglycan release was found, and proteoglycan content tended to decrease. Naproxen treatment was not associated with changes in any parameter. In contrast, aceclofenac and, prominently, celecoxib had beneficial effects on OA cartilage. Both were associated with increased proteoglycan synthesis and normalized release. Importantly, both NSAIDs improved proteoglycan content. Inhibition of prostaglandin E₂ production indirectly showed that all NSAIDs inhibited COX, with the more COX-2 specific agents having more pronounced effects. Selective COX-1 inhibition resulted in adverse effects on all parameters, and prostaglandin E₂ production was only mildly inhibited. NSAIDs with low COX-2/COX-1 selectivity exhibit adverse direct effects on OA cartilage, whereas high COX-2/COX-1 selective NSAIDs did not show such effects and might even have cartilage reparative properties.     

Differential direct effects of cyclo-oxygenase-1/2 inhibition on proteoglycan turnover of human osteoarthritic cartilage: an in vitro study

Treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diminishes inflammation along with mediators of cartilage destruction. However, NSAIDs may exert adverse direct effects on cartilage, particularly if treatment is prolonged. We therefore compared the direct effects of indomethacin, naproxen, aceclofenac and celecoxib on matrix turnover in human OA cartilage tissue. Human clinically defined OA cartilage from five different donors was exposed for 7 days in culture to indomethacin, naproxen, aceclofenac and celecoxib--agents chosen based on their cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selectivity. As a control, SC-560 (a selective COX-1 inhibitor) was used. Changes in cartilage proteoglycan turnover and prostaglandin E2 production were determined. OA cartilage exhibited characteristic proteoglycan turnover. Indomethacin further inhibited proteoglycan synthesis; no significant effect of indomethacin on proteoglycan release was found, and proteoglycan content tended to decrease. Naproxen treatment was not associated with changes in any parameter. In contrast, aceclofenac and, prominently, celecoxib had beneficial effects on OA cartilage. Both were associated with increased proteoglycan synthesis and normalized release. Importantly, both NSAIDs improved proteoglycan content. Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 production indirectly showed that all NSAIDs inhibited COX, with the more COX-2 specific agents having more pronounced effects. Selective COX-1 inhibition resulted in adverse effects on all parameters, and prostaglandin E2 production was only mildly inhibited. NSAIDs with low COX-2/COX-1 selectivity exhibit adverse direct effects on OA cartilage, whereas high COX-2/COX-1 selective NSAIDs did not show such effects and might even have cartilage reparative properties.     

Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing

Angiogenesis, the formation of new capillary blood vessels, is essential not only for the growth and metastasis of solid tumors, but also for wound and ulcer healing, because without the restoration of blood flow, oxygen and nutrients cannot be delivered to the healing site. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin, indomethacin and ibuprofen are the most widely used drugs for pain, arthritis, cardiovascular diseases and, more recently, the prevention of colon cancer and Alzheimer disease. However, NSAIDs produce gastroduodenal ulcers in about 25% of users (often with bleeding and/or perforations) and delay ulcer healing, presumably by blocking prostaglandin synthesis from cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 (ref. 10). The hypothesis that the gastrointestinal side effects of NSAIDs result from inhibition of COX-1, but not COX-2 (ref. 11), prompted the development of NSAIDs that selectively inhibit only COX-2 (such as celecoxib and rofecoxib). Our study demonstrates that both selective and nonselective NSAIDs inhibit angiogenesis through direct effects on endothelial cells. We also show that this action involves inhibition of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (ERK2) activity, interference with ERK nuclear translocation, is independent of protein kinase C and has prostaglandin-dependent and prostaglandin-independent components. Finally, we show that both COX-1 and COX-2 are important for the regulation of angiogenesis. These findings challenge the premise that selective COX-2 inhibitors will not affect the gastrointestinal tract and ulcer/wound healing.