DNA methylation and late replication probably aid cell memory, and type I DNA reeling could aid chromosome folding and enhancer function

DNA methylation in mammals is reviewed, and it is concluded that one role of methylation is to aid cell memory, which is defined as the ability of mitotically derived progeny cells to remember and re-establish their proper cellular identity. Methylation of X-linked CpG-rich islands probably stabilizes X-chromosome inactivation, but other mechanisms appear to be involved. Late replication is discussed as a key ancestral mechanism for X inactivation, and it is emphasized that early and late replication domains may each be self perpetuating. Therefore, early-late replication timing becomes another strong candidate mechanism for cell memory. A chromosome-loop folding enigma is discussed, and it is concluded that special mechanisms are needed to explain the formation and maintenance of specific looped domains. DNA reeling, such as done by type I restriction-modification enzymes, is proposed to provide this special mechanism for folding. DNA reeling mechanisms can help to explain the cis-spreading of X-chromosome inactivation as well as long-range action by enhancers.     

Split decision: why it matters?

The establishment and faithful maintenance of epigenetic information in the context of chromatin are crucial for a great number of biologic phenomena, including position effect variegation, Polycomb silencing, X-chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting. However, mechanisms by which that the correct histone modification patterns propagate into daughter cells during mitotic divisions remain to be elucidated. The partitioning pattern of parental histone H3–H4 tetramers is a critical question toward our understanding of the epigenetic inheritance. In this review, we discuss why the histone H3–H4 tetramer split decision matters.     

Genomic imprinting and epigenetic control of development

Epigenetic mechanisms are extensively utilized during mammalian development. Specific patterns of gene expression are established during cell fate decisions, maintained as differentiation progresses, and often augmented as more specialized cell types are required. Much of what is known about these mechanisms comes from the study of two distinct epigenetic phenomena: genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation. In the case of genomic imprinting, alleles are expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner, whereas X-chromosome inactivation in females requires that only one X chromosome is active in each somatic nucleus. As model systems for epigenetic regulation, genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation have identified and elucidated the numerous regulatory mechanisms that function throughout the genome during development.     

CpG methylation of an X-linked transgene is determined by somatic events postfertilization and not germline imprinting

The process of X-inactivation in mammals requires at least two events, the initiation of inactivation and the maintenance of the inactive state. One possible mechanism of control is by methylation of DNA at CpG dinucleotides to maintain the inactive state. Furthermore, the paternal X-chromosome is frequently inactivated in the extraembryonic membranes. The relationship between the parental origin of the chromosome, nonrandom inactivation and DNA methylation is not clear. In this paper, we report on the CpG methylation of an X-linked transgene, CAT-32. The levels of methylation in embryonic, extraembryonic and germline cells indicates that the modifications of the transgene are broadly similar to those reported for endogenous X-linked genes. Interestingly, the methylation of CAT-32 transgene in extraembryonic tissues displays patterns that could be linked to the germline origin of each allele. Hence, the maternally derived copy of CAT-32 was relatively undermethylated when compared to the paternal one. The changes in DNA methylation were attributed to de novo methylation occurring after fertilization, most probably during differentiation of extraembryonic tissues. In order to determine whether or not the patterns of DNA methylation reflected the germline origin of the X-chromosome, we constructed triploid embryos specifically to introduce two maternal X-chromosomes in the same embryo. In some of these triploid conceptuses, methylation patterns characteristic of the paternally derived transgene were observed. This observation indicates that the methylation patterns are not necessarily dependent on the parental origin of the X-chromosome, but could be changed by somatic events after fertilization. One of the more likely mechanisms is methylation of the transgene following inactivation of the X-chromosome in extraembryonic tissues.     

Cutting edge: stable epigenetic inheritance of regional IFN-gamma promoter demethylation in CD44highCD8+ T lymphocytes

Genomic DNA methylation patterns influence the development and maintenance of function during cellular differentiation. Methylation of regulatory sequences can have long-lasting effects on gene expression if inherited in an epigenetic manner. Recent work suggests that DNA methylation has a regulatory role in differential cytokine gene expression in primary T lymphocytes. Here we show, by clonal lineage analysis, that methylation patterns in the IFN-gamma promoter exhibit long term faithful inheritance in CD44highCD8+ T cells and their progeny, through 16 cell divisions and a clonal expansion of 5 orders of magnitude. Moreover, the demethylated IFN-gamma promoter is faithfully inherited following the withdrawal of T cell stimulation and the loss of detectable IFN-gamma mRNA, consistent with passive rather than active maintenance mechanisms. This represents a form of stable cellular memory, of defined epigenetic characteristics, that may contribute to the maintenance of T cell cytokine expression patterns and T cell memory.     

X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms from the human perspective

X-chromosome inactivation is an epigenetic process whereby one X chromosome is silenced in mammalian female cells. Since it was first proposed by Lyon in 1961, mouse models have been valuable tools to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying X inactivation. However, there are also inherent differences between mouse and human X inactivation, ranging from sequence content of the X inactivation center to the phenotypic outcomes of X-chromosome abnormalities. X-linked gene dosage in males, females, and individuals with X aneuploidies and X/autosome translocations has demonstrated that many human genes escape X inactivation, implicating cis-regulatory elements in the spread of silencing. We discuss the potential nature of these elements and also review the elements in the X inactivation center involved in the early events in X-chromosome inactivation.     

What an epigenome remembers

During mammalian development, maintenance of cell fate through mitotic divisions require faithful replication not only of the DNA but also of a particular epigenetic state. Germline cells have the capacity of erasing this epigenetic memory at crucial times during development, thereby resetting their epigenome. Certain marks, however, appear to escape this reprogramming, which allows their transmission to the offspring and potentially guarantees transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Here we discuss the molecular requirements for faithful transmission of epigenetic information and our current knowledge about the transmission of epigenetic information through generations.     

X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells

X-chromosome inactivation is an epigenetic hallmark of mammalian development. Chromosome-wide regulation of the X-chromosome is essential in embryonic and germ cell development. In the male germline, the X-chromosome goes through meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, and the chromosome-wide silencing is maintained from meiosis into spermatids before the transmission to female embryos. In early female mouse embryos, X-inactivation is imprinted to occur on the paternal X-chromosome, representing the epigenetic programs acquired in both parental germlines. Recent advances revealed that the inactive X-chromosome in both females and males can be dissected into two elements: repeat elements versus unique coding genes. The inactive paternal X in female preimplantation embryos is reactivated in the inner cell mass of blastocysts in order to subsequently allow the random form of X-inactivation in the female embryo, by which both Xs have an equal chance of being inactivated. X-chromosome reactivation is regulated by pluripotency factors and also occurs in early female germ cells and in pluripotent stem cells, where X-reactivation is a stringent marker of naive ground state pluripotency. Here we summarize recent progress in the study of X-inactivation and X-reactivation during mammalian reproduction and development as well as in pluripotent stem cells.     

The long and the short of it: RNA-directed chromatin asymmetry in mammalian X-chromosome inactivation

Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation is controlled by a multilayered silencing pathway involving both short and long non-coding RNAs, which differentially recruit the epigenetic machinery to establish chromatin asymmetries. In response to developmentally regulated small RNAs, dicer, a key effector of RNA interference, locally silences Xist on the active X-chromosome and establishes the heterochromatin conformation along the silent X-chromosome. The 1.6 kb RepA RNA initiates silencing by targeting the PRC2 polycomb complex to the inactive X-chromosome. In addition, the nuclear microenvironment is implicated in the initiation and maintenance of X-chromosome asymmetries. Here we review new findings involving these various RNA species in terms of understanding Xist gene regulation and the establishment of X-chromosome inactivation.     

X-chromosome epigenetic reprogramming in pluripotent stem cells via noncoding genes

Acquisition of the pluripotent state coincides with epigenetic reprogramming of the X-chromosome. Female embryonic stem cells are characterized by the presence of two active X-chromosomes, cell differentiation by inactivation of one of the two Xs, and induced pluripotent stem cells by reactivation of the inactivated X-chromosome in the originating somatic cell. The tight linkage between X- and stem cell reprogramming occurs through pluripotency factors acting on noncoding genes of the X-inactivation center. This review article will discuss the latest advances in our understanding at the molecular level. Mouse embryonic stem cells provide a standard for defining the pluripotent ground state, which is characterized by low levels of the noncoding Xist RNA and the absence of heterochromatin marks on the X-chromosome. Human pluripotent stem cells, however, exhibit X-chromosome epigenetic instability that may have implications for their use in regenerative medicine. XIST RNA and heterochromatin marks on the X-chromosome indicate whether human pluripotent stem cells are developmentally ‘naïve’, with characteristics of the pluripotent ground state. X-chromosome status and determination thereof via noncoding RNA expression thus provide valuable benchmarks of the epigenetic quality of pluripotent stem cells, an important consideration given their enormous potential for stem cell therapy.     

Random X-chromosome inactivation: skewing lessons for mice and men

The mammalian X-chromosome exists in two flavors, active and inactive, in each cell of the adult female. This phenomenon originates from the process of random choice occurring early in development in a small number of progenitor cells in which the decision is made to inactivate either one or the other X chromosome on a cell-autonomous basis. Once made, this initial decision is irreversible, although exceptions exist in specific chromosomal territories and cell lineages. Recent findings implicate various factors, including non-coding RNAs and chromatin modification complexes, as effectors in the initiation and maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. The functional redundancy of such factors almost certainly plays an important role in the stability of the inactive X. Studying skewing or bias opens an important opportunity for understanding facets of the random choice process.     

Correlation between X-chromosome inactivation and cell differentiation in female preimplantation mouse embryos

By means of a cytological method involving BrdU incorporation and acridine orange fluorescence staining in combination with embryo manipulation, we studied X-chromosome activity in female preimplantation mouse embryos with special reference to the correlation between X-chromosome inactivation and cell differentiation. There was no sign of asynchronous replication between the two X chromosomes from the one-cell to intermediate blastocyst stage. The allocyclic X chromosome, first detected in late blastocysts, was paternal in origin, mostly replicating early in the S phase and limited to the trophectoderm. Subsequent X-chromosome inactivation occurring in the primary endoderm was also characterized by the involvement of the paternal X and early replication. Both X chromosomes continued to replicate synchronously in the embryonic ectoderm or epiblast at this stage. It was evident that overt cell differentiation preceded the appearance of the asynchronously replicating X chromosome in the trophectoderm and primary endoderm. This finding seems to support the view that cell differentiation is an important correlate of X-chromosome inactivation.     

X-chromosome inactivation in the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: a marker for detection of the carrier state and identification of cell lineages expressing the gene defect

Recently developed techniques for the direct analysis of DNA have made possible the determination of patterns of cellular X-chromosome inactivation. These techniques provide a potential method for carrier detection for several X-linked human disorders in which obligate carriers show nonrandom X inactivation. By using restriction fragment length polymorphic (RFLP) gene-specific probes in conjunction with methylation-sensitive enzymes, we have characterized the patterns of X-chromosome inactivation in cell subsets from females belonging to 10 kindreds segregating for the X-linked immune deficiency disorder Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS). We show that selective inactivation of the X chromosome distinguishes obligate WAS carriers from noncarrier females and constitutes a valuable marker of the WAS carrier state. Selective inactivation phenomena were observed in the monocytes and T and B lymphocytes of obligate carriers, implying that the WAS gene defect is expressed in each of these cellular lineages. In conjunction with the use of linked DNA markers, RFLP-methylation analysis should render carrier detection feasible for the majority of females from WAS families. The results of such analyses also provide an initial step toward identifying the cellular level and molecular basis for WAS.     

Determination of X-chromosome inactivation status using X-linked expressed polymorphisms identified by database searching

The large number of redundant sequences available in nucleotide databases provides a resource for the identification of polymorphisms. Expressed polymorphisms in X-linked genes can be used to determine the inactivation status of the genes, and polymorphisms in genes that are subject to inactivation can then be used as tools to examine X-chromosome inactivation status in heterozygous females. In this study, we have identified six new X-linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms and determined the inactivation status of these genes by examination of expression patterns in female cells previously demonstrated to have skewed inactivation, as well as by analysis of somatic cell hybrids retaining the inactive human X chromosome. Expression was seen from both alleles in females heterozygous for the RPS4X gene, confirming the previously reported expression from the inactive X chromosome. Expression of only a single allele was seen in females heterozygous for polymorphisms in the BGN, TM4SF2, ATP6S1, VBP1, and PDHA1 genes, suggesting that these genes are subject to X-chromosome inactivation.