Molecular events associated with the regulation of signaling by M2 muscarinic receptors

Multiple events are associated with the regulation of signaling by the M2 muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs). Desensitization of the attenuation of adenylyl cyclase by the M2 mAChRs appears to involve agonist-dependent phosphorylation of M2 mAChRs by G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) that phosphorylate the receptors in a serine/threonine rich motif in the 3rd intracellular domain of the receptors. Mutation of residues 307-311 from TVSTS to AVAAA in this domain of the human M2 mAChR results in a loss of receptor/G-protein uncoupling and a loss of arrestin binding. Agonist-induced sequestration of receptors away from their normal membrane environment is also regulated by agonist-induced phosphorylation of the M2 mAChRs on the 3rd intracellular domain, but in HEK cells, the predominant pathway of internalization is not regulated by GRKs or arrestins. This pathway of internalization is not inhibited by a dominant negative dynamin, and does not appear to involve either clathrin coated pits or caveolae. The signaling of the M2 mAChR to G-protein regulated inwardly rectifying K channels (GIRKs) can be modified by RGS proteins. In HEK cells, expression of RGS proteins leads to a constitutive activation of the channels through a mechanism that depends on Gbetagamma. RGS proteins appear to increase the concentration of free Gbetagamma in addition to acting as GAPs. Thus multiple mechanisms acting at either the level of the M2 mAChRs or the G-proteins can contribute to the regulation of signaling via the M2 mAChRs.     

Sequestration of dopamine D2 receptors depends on coexpression of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 or 5.

We examined the agonist-dependent sequestration/internalization of dopamine D2 receptor (the long form D2L and short form D2S), which were transiently expressed in COS-7 and HEK 293 cells with or without G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2 or GRK5). Sequestration was assessed quantitatively by loss of [3H] sulpiride-binding activity from the cell surface and by transfer of [3H] spiperone-binding activity from the membrane fraction to the light vesicle fraction in sucrose-density gradients. In COS-7 cells expressing D2 receptors alone, virtually no sequestration was observed with or without dopamine (< 4%). When GRK2 was coexpressed, 50% of D2S receptors and 36% of D2L receptors were sequestered by treatment with 10(-4) M dopamine for 2 h, whereas no sequestration was observed in cells expressing the dominant negative form of GRK2 (DN-GRK2). When GRK5 was coexpressed, 36% of D2S receptors were sequestered following the same treatment. The agonist-dependent and GRK2-dependent sequestration of D2S receptors was reduced markedly in the presence of hypertonic medium containing 0.45 M sucrose, suggesting that the sequestration follows the clathrin pathway. Internalization of D2S receptors was also assessed by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. Translocation of D2 receptors from the cell membrane to intracellular vesicles was observed following the treatment with dopamine from HEK 293 cells only when GRK2 was coexpressed. D2S receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells were shown to be phosphorylated by GRK2 in an agonist-dependent manner. These results indicate that the sequestration of D2 receptors occurs only through a GRK-mediated pathway.     

Distinct internalization of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors confers selective and long-lasting desensitization of signaling to phospholipase C

Although M1-M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in HEK-293 cells internalize on agonist stimulation, only M1, M3, and M4 but not M2 mAChRs recycle to the plasma membrane. To investigate the functional consequences of this phenomenon, we compared desensitization and resensitization of M2 versus M4 mAChRs. Treatment with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h at 37 degrees C reduced numbers of cell surface M2 and M4 mAChRs by 40-50% and M2 and M4 mAChR-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) increases, and phospholipase C (PLC) activation by 60-70%. Receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and [Ca2+]i increases significantly resensitized within 3 h. However, M4 but not M2 mAChR-mediated PLC activation resensitized. At 16 degrees C, M2 mAChR-mediated [Ca2+]i increases and PLC stimulation desensitized to a similar extent as at 37 degrees C. However, at 16 degrees C, where M2 mAChR internalization is negligible, both M2 mAChR responses resensitized, demonstrating that M2 mAChR resensitization proceeds at the plasma membrane. Examination of M2 mAChR responses following inactivation of cell surface mAChRs by quinuclidinyl benzilate revealed substantial receptor reserve for coupling to [Ca2+]i increases but not to PLC. We conclude that M2 mAChR internalization induces long-lasting PLC desensitization predominantly because receptor loss is not compensated for by receptor recycling or receptor reserve.     

Essential role of dynamin in internalization of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine and angiotensin AT1A receptors

Most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR), internalize in clathrin-coated vesicles, a process that requires dynamin GTPase. The observation that some GPCRs like the M(2) mAChR and the angiotensin AT(1A) receptor (AT(1A)R) internalize irrespective of expression of dominant-negative K44A dynamin has led to the proposal that internalization of these GPCRs is dynamin-independent. Here, we report that, contrary to what is postulated, internalization of M(2) mAChR and AT(1A)R in HEK-293 cells is dynamin-dependent. Expression of N272 dynamin, which lacks the GTP-binding domain, or K535M dynamin, which is not stimulatable by phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate, strongly inhibits internalization of M(1) and M(2) mAChRs and AT(1A)Rs. Expression of kinase-defective K298M c-Src or Y231F,Y597F dynamin (which cannot be phosphorylated by c-Src) reduces M(1) mAChR internalization. Similarly, c-Src inhibitor PP1 as well as the generic tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein strongly inhibit M(1) mAChR internalization. In contrast, M(2) mAChR internalization is not (or is only slightly) reduced by expression of these constructs or treatment with PP1 or genistein. Thus, dynamin GTPases are not only essential for M(1) mAChR but also for M(2) mAChR and AT(1A)R internalization in HEK-293 cells. Our findings also indicate that dynamin GTPases are differentially regulated by c-Src-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation.     

Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor sequestration and function by beta-arrestin

After activation, agonist-occupied G protein-coupled receptors are phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and bind cytosolic beta-arrestins, which uncouple the receptors from their cognate G proteins. Recent studies on the beta2-adrenergic receptor have demonstrated that beta-arrestin also targets the receptors to clathrin-coated pits for subsequent internalization and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. We and others have previously shown that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) of the m1, m3, and m4 subtype require functional dynamin to sequester into HEK-293 tsA201 cells, whereas m2 mAChRs sequester in a dynamin-independent manner. To investigate the role of beta-arrestin in mAChR sequestration, we determined the effect of overexpressing beta-arrestin-1 and the dominant-negative inhibitor of beta-arrestin-mediated receptor sequestration, beta-arrestin-1 V53D, on mAChR sequestration and function. Sequestration of m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs was suppressed by 60-75% in cells overexpressing beta-arrestin-1 V53D, whereas m2 mAChR sequestration was affected by less than 10%. In addition, overexpression of beta-arrestin-1 V53D as well as dynamin K44A significantly suppressed m1 mAChR-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Finally, we investigated whether mAChRs sequester into clathrin-coated vesicles by overexpressing Hub, a dominant-negative clathrin mutant. Although sequestration of m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs was inhibited by 50-70%, m2 mAChR sequestration was suppressed by less than 10%. We conclude that m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs expressed in HEK-293 tsA201 cells sequester into clathrin-coated vesicles in a beta-arrestin- and dynamin-dependent manner, whereas sequestration of m2 mAChRs in these cells is largely independent of these proteins.     

Transfer of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to clathrin-derived early endosomes following clathrin-independent endocytosis

Upon agonist stimulation, many G protein-coupled receptors such as beta(2)-adrenergic receptors are internalized via beta-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent mechanisms, whereas others, like M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), are internalized by clathrin- and arrestin-independent mechanisms. To gain further insight into the mechanisms that regulate M(2) mAChR endocytosis, we investigated the post-endocytic trafficking of M(2) mAChRs in HeLa cells and the role of the ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) GTPase in regulating M(2) mAChR internalization. Here, we report that M(2) mAChRs are rapidly internalized by a clathrin-independent pathway that is inhibited up to 50% by expression of either GTPase-defective Arf6 Q67L or an upstream Arf6 activator, Galpha(q) Q209L. In contrast, M(2) mAChR internalization was not affected by expression of dominant-negative dynamin 2 K44A, which is a known inhibitor of clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Nevertheless, M(2) mAChRs, which are initially internalized in structures that lack clathrin-dependent endosomal markers, quickly localize to endosomes that contain the clathrin-dependent, early endosomal markers early endosome autoantigen-1, transferrin receptor, and GTPase-defective Rab5 Q79L, which is known to swell early endosomal compartments. These results suggest that M(2) mAChRs initially internalize via an Arf6-associated, clathrin-independent pathway but then quickly merge with the clathrin endocytic pathway at the level of early endosomes.     

FRET-based detection of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation by orthosteric and allosteric agonists

Background and Objective

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are 7-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptors that regulate a variety of physiological processes and represent potentially important targets for therapeutic intervention. mAChRs can be stimulated by full and partial orthosteric and allosteric agonists, however the relative abilities of such ligands to induce conformational changes in the receptor remain unclear. To gain further insight into the actions of mAChR agonists, we have developed a fluorescently tagged M₁ mAChR that reports ligand-induced conformational changes in real-time by changes in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET).

Methods

Variants of CFP and YFP were inserted into the third intracellular loop and at the end of the C-terminus of the mouse M₁ mAChR, respectively. The optimized FRET receptor construct (M₁-cam5) was expressed stably in HEK293 cells.

Results

The variant CFP/YFP-receptor chimera expressed predominantly at the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells and displayed ligand-binding affinities comparable with those of the wild-type receptor. It also retained an ability to interact with Gα_q/11 proteins and to stimulate phosphoinositide turnover, ERK1/2 phosphorylation and undergo agonist-dependent internalization. Addition of the full agonist methacholine caused a reversible decrease in M₁ FRET (F_EYFP/F_ECFP) that was prevented by atropine pre-addition and showed concentration-dependent amplitude and kinetics. Partial orthosteric agonists, arecoline and pilocarpine, as well as allosteric agonists, AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1, also caused atropine-sensitive decreases in the FRET signal, which were smaller in amplitude and significantly slower in onset compared to those evoked by methacholine.

Conclusion

The M₁ FRET-based receptor chimera reports that allosteric and orthosteric agonists induce similar conformational changes in the third intracellular loop and/or C-terminus, and should prove to be a valuable molecular reagent for pharmacological and structural investigations of M₁ mAChR activation.     

Transient hypoxia induces sequestration of M1 and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Oxidative stress has been implicated in impairing muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) signaling activity. It remains unclear, however, whether alterations in the cell surface distribution of mAChRs following oxidative stress contribute to the diminished mAChR signaling activity. We report here that M1 and M2 mAChRs, stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, undergo sequestration following transient hypoxic-induced oxidative stress (2% O2). Sequestration of M1 and M2 mAChRs following transient hypoxia was associated with an increase in phosphorylation of these receptors. Over-expression of a catalytically inactive G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2 K220R) blocked the increased phosphorylation and sequestration of the M2, but not M1, mAChRs following transient hypoxia. Hypoxia induced phosphorylation and sequestration of the M1 mAChR was, however, blocked by over-expression of a catalytically inactive casein kinase 1 alpha (CK1alpha K46R). These results are the first demonstration that M1 and M2 mAChRs undergo sequestration following transient hypoxia. The data suggest that increased phosphorylation of M1 and M2 mAChRs underlies the mechanism responsible for sequestration of these receptors following transient hypoxia. We report here that distinct pathways involving CK1alpha and GRK2 mediated sequestration of M1 and M2 mAChRs following transient hypoxic-induced oxidative stress.     

Arrestin binding to the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is precluded by an inhibitory element in the third intracellular loop of the receptor

Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves the binding of members of the family of arrestins to the receptors. In the model system involving the visual GPCR rhodopsin, activation and phosphorylation of rhodopsin is thought to convert arrestin from a low to high affinity binding state. Phosphorylation of the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) has been shown to be required for binding of arrestins 2 and 3 in vitro and for arrestin-enhanced internalization in intact cells (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14152-14158). For the M(2) mAChR, arrestin binding requires phosphorylation at multiple serine and threonine residues at amino acids 307-311 in the third intracellular (i3) loop. Here, we have investigated the molecular basis for the requirement of receptor phosphorylation for arrestin binding. Constructs of arrestin 2 that can bind to other GPCRs in a phosphorylation-independent manner were unable to interact with a mutant M(2) mAChR in which the Ser/Thr residues at 307-311 were mutated to alanines. However, although phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the M(2) mAChR that lacked 50-157 amino acids from the i3 loop were unable to undergo agonist-dependent internalization when expressed alone in tsA201 cells, co-expression of arrestin 2 or 3 restored agonist-dependent internalization. Furthermore, a deletion of only 15 amino acids (amino acids 304-319) was sufficient to allow for phosphorylation-independent arrestin-receptor interaction. These results indicate that phosphorylation at residues 307-311 does not appear to be required to activate arrestin into a high affinity binding state. Instead, phosphorylation at residues 307-311 appears to facilitate the removal of an inhibitory constraint that precludes receptor-arrestin association in the absence of receptor phosphorylation.     

Acidic amino acids flanking phosphorylation sites in the M2 muscarinic receptor regulate receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and interaction with arrestins

The studies reported here address the molecular events underlying the interactions of arrestins with the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). In particular, we focused on the role of receptor phosphorylation in this process. Agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the M(2) mAChR can occur at clusters of serines and threonines at positions 286-290 (site P1) or 307-311 (site P2) in the third intracellular loop (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14152-14158). Phosphorylation at either P1 or P2 can support agonist-dependent internalization. However, phosphorylation at P2 is required for receptor interaction with arrestins (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., Gurevich, V. V., Lee, K. B., Ptasienski, J. A., Benovic, J. L., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23682-26389). The present study investigated the role of acidic amino acids between P1 and P2 in regulating receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and receptor/arrestin interactions. Mutation of the acidic amino acids at positions 298-300 (site A1) and/or 304-305 (site A2) to alanines had significant effects on agonist-dependent phosphorylation. P2 was identified as the preferred site of agonist-dependent phosphorylation, and full phosphorylation at P2 required the acidic amino acids at A1 or their neutral counterparts. In contrast, phosphorylation at site P1 was dependent on site A2. In addition, sites A1 and A2 significantly affected the ability of the wild type and P1 and P2 mutant receptors to internalization and to interact with arrestin2. Substitution of asparagine and glutamine for the aspartates and glutamates at sites A1 or A2 did not influence receptor phosphorylation but did influence arrestin interaction with the receptor. We propose that the amino acids at sites A1 and A2 play important roles in agonist-dependent phosphorylation at sites P2 and P1, respectively, and also play an important role in arrestin interactions with the M(2) mAChR.     

Differential regulation by agonist and phorbol ester of cloned m1 and m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in mouse Y1 adrenal cells and in Y1 cells deficient in cAMP-dependent protein kinase

Cloned muscarinic acetylcholine m1 and m2 receptors were expressed in stably transfected mouse Y1 adrenal cells and in a variant Y1 line, Kin-8, which is deficient in cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity (PKA-). m1 and m2 receptors were rapidly internalized following exposure of transfected PKA+ or PKA- cells to the muscarinic agonist carbachol. Thus, agonist-dependent internalization of m1 and m2 did not require PKA activity. A differential effect of PKA on regulation by agonist of the m2 receptor, but not the m1 receptor, was unmasked in PKA- cells. The m2 receptor was more sensitive to agonist-dependent internalization, and its rate of internalization was faster in PKA- cells than it was in PKA+ cells. Treatment of PKA+ cells with 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP or forskolin did not result in internalization of either m1 or m2 receptors and did not alter the extent of agonist-dependent internalization of m2. These data indicate that the basal activity of PKA may modulate the agonist-dependent internalization of the m2 receptor, but not the m1 receptor. The internalization of the m1 and m2 receptors in both PKA+ and PKA- cells was accompanied by desensitization of functional responses. Exposure of PKA+ cells to 10(-7) M phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), an activator of protein kinase C, resulted in a 30 +/- 9% decrease in the number of m1 receptors on the cell surface. However, treatment of PKA- cells expressing the m1 receptor did not result in internalization, suggesting that PKA was required for some aspect of PMA-dependent internalization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Quantification of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Internatilization Using G-Protein Coupled Receptor-Green Fluorescent Protein Conjugates with the ArrayScantrade mark High-Content Screening System

Many G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) undergo ligand-dependent homologous desensitization and internalization. Desensitization, defined as a decrease in the responsiveness to ligand, is accompanied by receptor aggregation on the cell surface and internalization via clathrin-coated pits to an intracellular endosomal compartment. In this study, we have taken advantage of the trafficking properties of GPCRs to develop a useful screening method for the identification of receptor mimetics. A series of studies were undertaken to evaluate the expression, functionality, and ligand-dependent trafficking of GPCR-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion conjugates stably transfected into HEK 293 cells. These GPCR-GFP expressing cells were then utilized in the validation of the ArrayScantrade mark (Cellomicstrade mark, Pittsburgh, PA), a microtiter plate imaging system that permits cellular and subcellular quantitation of fluorescence in whole cells. These studies demonstrated our ability to measure the internalization of a parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor-GFP conjugate after ligand treatment by spatially resolving internalized receptors. Internalization was time- and dose-dependent and appeared to be selective for PTH. Similar results were obtained for a beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2) AR)-GFP conjugate stably expressed in HEK 293 cells. The internalized GFP-labeled receptors were visualized as numerous punctate 3spots2 within the cell interior. An algorithm has been developed that identifies and collects information about these spots, allowing quantification of the internalization process. Variables such as the receptor-GFP expression level, plating density, cell number per field, number of fields scanned per well, spot size, and spot intensity were evaluated during the development of this assay. The method represents a valuable tool to screen for receptor mimetics and antagonists of receptor internalization in whole cells rapidly.     

Sphingosine kinase-mediated calcium signaling by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Based on the finding that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can induce Ca2+ mobilization, apparently independent of the phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) pathway, we investigated whether sphingosine kinase, which generates sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPP), is involved in calcium signaling by mAChR and other GPCRs. Inhibition of sphingosine kinase by DL-threo-dihydrosphingosine and N,/N-dimethylsphingosine markedly inhibited [Ca2+]i increases elicited by M2 and M3 mAChRs in HEK-293 cells without affecting PLC activation. Activation of M2 and M3 mAChR rapidly and transiently stimulated production of SPP. Furthermore, microinjection of SPP into HEK-293 cells induced rapid and transient Ca2+ mobilization. Pretreatment of HEK-293 cells with the calcium chelator BAPTA/AM fully blocked mAChR-induced SPP production. On the other hand, incubation of HEK-293 cells with calcium ionophores activated SPP production. Similar findings were obtained for formyl peptide and P2Y2 purinergic receptors in HL-60 cells. On the basis of these studies we propose, that following initial IP3 production by receptor-mediated PLC activation, a local discrete increase in [Ca2+]i induces sphingosine kinase stimulation, which ultimately leads to full calcium mobilization. Thus, sphingosine kinase activation most likely represents an amplification system for calcium signaling by mAChRs and other GPCRs.     

Rapid internalization and recycling of the human neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptor.

Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves receptor phosphorylation and reduction in the number of receptors at the cell surface. The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(1) receptor undergoes fast desensitization. We examined agonist-induced signaling and internalization using NPY Y(1) receptors fused to green fluorescent protein (EGFP). When expressed in HEK293 cells, EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors were localized at the plasma membrane, desensitized rapidly as assessed using calcium responses, and had similar properties compared to hNPY Y(1) receptors. Upon agonist challenge, the EGFP signal decreased rapidly (t(1/2) = 107 +/- 3 s) followed by a slow recovery. This decrease was blocked by BIBP3226, a Y(1) receptor antagonist, or by pertussis toxin, in agreement with Y(1) receptor activation. Internalization of EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors to acidic endosomal compartments likely accounts for the decrease in the EGFP signal, being absent after pretreatment with monensin. Concanavalin A and hypertonic sucrose, which inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis, blocked the decrease in fluorescence. After agonist, intracellular EGFP signals were punctate and co-localized with transferrin-Texas Red, a marker of clathrin-associated internalization and recycling, but not with LysoTracker Red, a lysosomal pathway marker, supporting receptor trafficking to recycling endosomes rather than the late endosomal/lysosomal pathway. Pulse-chase experiments revealed no receptor degradation after internalization. The slow recovery of fluorescence was unaffected by cycloheximide or actinomycin D, indicating that de novo synthesis of receptors was not limiting. Use of a multicompartment model to fit our fluorescence data allows simultaneous determination of internalization and recycling rate constants. We propose that rapid internalization of receptors via the clathrin-coated pits recycling pathway may largely account for the rapid desensitization of NPY Y(1) receptors.     

The G-protein-coupled receptor kinase GRK4 mediates homologous desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1.

G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are involved in the regulation of many G-protein-coupled receptors. As opposed to the other GRKs, such as rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) or beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK, GRK2), no receptor substrate for GRK4 has been so far identified. Here we show that GRK4 is expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells, where it regulates mGlu(1) metabotropic glutamate receptors, as indicated by the following: 1) When coexpressed in heterologous cells (HEK293), mGlu(1) receptor signaling was desensitized by GRK4 in an agonist-dependent manner (homologous desensitization). 2) In transfected HEK293 and in cultured Purkinje cells, the exposure to glutamate agonists induced internalization of the receptor and redistribution of GRK4. There was a substantial colocalization of the receptor and kinase both under basal condition and after internalization. 3) Kinase activity was necessary for desensitizing mGlu(1a) receptor and agonist-dependent phosphorylation of this receptor was also documented. 4) Antisense treatment of cultured Purkinje cells, which significantly reduced the levels of GRK4 expression, induced a marked modification of the mGlu(1)-mediated functional response, consistent with an impaired receptor desensitization. The critical role for GRK4 in regulating mGlu(1) receptors implicates a major involvement of this kinase in the physiology of Purkinje cell and in motor learning.     

Multiple topological domains mediate subtype-specific internalization of the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Endocytosis of agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is required for both resensitization and recycling to the cell surface as well as lysosomal degradation. Thus, this process is crucial for regulation of receptor signaling and cellular responsiveness. Although many GPCRs internalize into clathrin-coated vesicles in a dynamin-dependent manner, some receptors, including the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR), can also exhibit dynamin-independent internalization. We have identified five amino acids, located in the sixth and seventh transmembrane domains and the third intracellular loop, that are essential for agonist-induced M(2) mAChR internalization via a dynamin-independent mechanism in JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cells. Substitution of these residues into the M(1) mAChR, which does not internalize in these cells, is sufficient for conversion to the internalization-competent M(2) mAChR phenotype, whereas removal of these residues from the M(2) mAChR blocks internalization. Cotransfection of a dominant-negative isoform of dynamin has no effect on M(2) mAChR internalization. An internalization-incompetent M(2) mutant that lacks a subset of the necessary residues can still internalize via a G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 and beta-arrestin-dependent pathway. Furthermore, internalization is independent of the signal transduction pathway that is activated. These results identify a novel motif that specifies structural requirements for subtype-specific dynamin-independent internalization of a GPCR.     

Src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) dephosphorylates VEGF Receptor-2 and attenuates endothelial DNA synthesis, but not migration*

Background

Sustained agonist-promoted ubiquitination of β-arrestin has been correlated with increased stability of the GPCR – β-arrestin complex. Moreover, abrogation of β-arrestin ubiquitination has been reported to inhibit receptor internalization with minimal effects on receptor degradation.

Results

Herein we report that agonist activation of M₁ mAChRs produces a sustained β-arrestin ubiquitination but no stable co-localization with β-arrestin. In contrast, sustained ubiquitination of β-arrestin by activation of M₂ mAChRs does result in stable co-localization between the M₂ mAChR and β-arrestin. Internalization of receptors was unaffected by proteasome inhibitors, but down-regulation was significantly reduced, suggesting a role for the ubiquitination machinery in promoting down-regulation of the receptors. Given the ubiquitination status of β-arrestin following agonist treatment, we sought to determine the effects of β-arrestin ubiquitination on M₁ and M₂ mAChR down-regulation. A constitutively ubiquitinated β-arrestin 2 chimera in which ubiquitin is fused to the C-terminus of β-arrestin 2 (YFP-β-arrestin 2-Ub) significantly increased agonist-promoted down-regulation of both M₁ and M₂ mAChRs, with the effect substantially higher on the M₂ mAChR. Based on this observation, we were interested in examining the effects of disruption of potential ubiquitination sites in the β-arrestin sequence on receptor down-regulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of the M₂ mAChR was not affected by expression of β-arrestin lysine mutants lacking putative ubiquitination sites, β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R}, while down-regulation and stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant were significantly reduced. Interestingly, expression of β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R} increased the agonist-promoted down-regulation of the M₁ mAChR but did not result in a stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that ubiquitination of β-arrestin has a distinct role in the differential trafficking and degradation of M₁ and M₂ mAChRs.     

Elongation Factor 1A Family Regulates the Recycling of the M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the elongation 1A (eEF1A) family regulates the cell surface density of the M4 subtype of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) following agonist-induced internalization. Here, we show that mouse brains lacking eEF1A2 have no detectable changes in M4 expression or localization. We, however, did discover that eEF1A1, the other eEF1A isoform, is expressed in adult neurons contrary to previous reports. This novel finding suggested that the lack of change in M4 expression and distribution in brains lacking eEF1A2 might be due to compensatory effects of eEF1A1. Supporting this theory, we demonstrate that the overexpression of either eEF1A1 or eEF1A2 inhibits M4 recovery to the cell surface after agonist-induced internalization in PC12 cells. Furthermore, eEF1A1 or eEF1A2 had no effect on the recovery of the M1 subtype in PC12 cells. These results demonstrate the novel ability of the eEF1A family to specifically regulate the M4 mAChR.     

Quantitative analysis of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor homo- and heterodimerization in live cells: regulation of receptor down-regulation by heterodimerization

Although previous pharmacological and biochemical data support the notion that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) form homo- and heterodimers, the existence of mAChR oligomers in live cells is still a matter of controversy. Here we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate that M(1), M(2), and M(3) mAChR can form constitutive homo- and heterodimers in living HEK 293 cells. Quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis has revealed that the cell receptor population in cells expressing a single subtype of M(1), M(2), or M(3) mAChR is predominantly composed of high affinity homodimers. Saturation curve analysis of cells expressing two receptor subtypes demonstrates the existence of high affinity M(1)/M(2), M(2)/M(3), and M(1)/M(3) mAChR heterodimers, although the relative affinity values were slightly lower than those for mAChR homodimers. Short term agonist treatment did not modify the oligomeric status of homo- and heterodimers. When expressed in JEG-3 cells, the M(2) receptor exhibits much higher susceptibility than the M(3) receptor to agonist-induced down-regulation. Coexpression of M(3) mAChR with increasing amounts of the M(2) subtype in JEG-3 cells resulted in an increased agonist-induced down-regulation of M(3), suggesting a novel role of heterodimerization in the mechanism of mAChR long term regulation.     

The role of beta-arrestins in the formyl peptide receptor-like 1 internalization and signaling

The N-formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that transmits intracellular signals in response to a variety of agonists, many of them being clearly implicated in human pathology. beta-arrestins are adaptor proteins that uncouple GPCRs from G protein and regulate receptor internalization. They can also function as signal transducers through the scaffolding of signaling molecules, such as components of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) cascade. We investigated the role of beta-arrestins in ligand-induced FPRL1 internalization and signaling. In HEK293 cells expressing FPRL1, fluorescence microscopy revealed that agonist-stimulated FPRL1 remained co-localized with beta-arrestins during endocytosis. Internalization of FPRL1, expressed in a mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cell line lacking endogenous beta-arrestins, was highly compromised. This distinguishes FPRL1 from the prototypical formyl peptide receptor FPR that is efficiently internalized in the absence of beta-arrestins. In both HEK293 and MEF cells, FPRL1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was a rapid and transient event. The kinetics and extent of ERK1/2 activation were not significantly modified by beta-arrestin overexpression. The pattern of FPRL1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was similar whether cells express or not beta-arrestins. Furthermore, treatment of the FPRL1 expressing cells with pertussis toxin inhibited ERK1/2 activation in MEF and in HEK293 cells. These results led us to conclude that activation of ERK1/2 mediated by FPRL1 occurs primarily through G protein signaling. Since beta-arrestin-mediated signaling has been observed essentially for receptors coupled to G proteins other than G(i), this may be a characteristic of G(i) protein-coupled chemoattractant receptors.