Microhomology-mediated DNA strand annealing and elongation by human DNA polymerases λ and β on normal and repetitive DNA sequences

'Classical' non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), dependent on the Ku70/80 and the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complexes, is essential for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Eukaryotic cells possess also an alternative microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) mechanism, which is independent from Ku and DNA ligase 4/XRCC4. The components of the MMEJ machinery are still largely unknown. Family X DNA polymerases (pols) are involved in the classical NHEJ pathway. We have compared in this work, the ability of human family X DNA pols β, λ and μ, to promote the MMEJ of different model templates with terminal microhomology regions. Our results reveal that DNA pol λ and DNA ligase I are sufficient to promote efficient MMEJ repair of broken DNA ends in vitro, and this in the absence of auxiliary factors. However, DNA pol β, not λ, was more efficient in promoting MMEJ of DNA ends containing the (CAG)n triplet repeat sequence of the human Huntingtin gene, leading to triplet expansion. The checkpoint complex Rad9/Hus1/Rad1 promoted end joining by DNA pol λ on non-repetitive sequences, while it limited triplet expansion by DNA pol β. We propose a possible novel role of DNA pol β in MMEJ, promoting (CAG)n triplet repeats instability.     

6-Carboxyfluorescein and structurally similar molecules inhibit DNA binding and repair by O⁶-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase

Human O⁶-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) repairs mutagenic O⁶-alkylguanine and O⁴-alkylthymine adducts in single-stranded and duplex DNAs. These activities protect normal cells and tumor cells against drugs that alkylate DNA; drugs that inactivate AGT are under test as chemotherapeutic enhancers. In studies using 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)-labeled DNAs, AGT reduced the fluorescence intensity by ∼40% at binding saturation, whether the FAM was located at the 5′ or the 3′ end of the DNA. AGT protected residual fluorescence from quenching, indicating a solute-inaccessible binding site for FAM. Sedimentation equilibrium analyses showed that saturating AGT-stoichiometries were higher with FAM-labeled DNAs than with unlabeled DNAs, suggesting that the FAM provides a protein binding site that is not present in unlabeled DNAs. Additional fluorescence and sedimentation measurements showed that AGT forms a 1:1 complex with free FAM. Active site benzylation experiments and docking calculations support models in which the primary binding site is located in or near the active site of the enzyme. Electrophoretic analyses show that FAM inhibits DNA binding (IC₅₀ ∼ 76 μM) and repair of DNA containing an O⁶-methylguanine residue (IC₅₀ ∼ 63 μM). Similar results were obtained with other polycyclic aromatic compounds. These observations demonstrate the existence of a new class of non-covalent AGT-inhibitors. After optimization for binding-affinity, members of this class might be useful in cancer chemotherapy.     

Physical Interactions between Mcm10, DNA, and DNA Polymerase ��

Mcm10 is an essential eukaryotic protein required for the initiation and elongation phases of chromosomal replication. Specifically, Mcm10 is required for the association of several replication proteins, including DNA polymerase α (pol α), with chromatin. We showed previously that the internal (ID) and C-terminal (CTD) domains of Mcm10 physically interact with both single-stranded (ss) DNA and the catalytic p180 subunit of pol α. However, the mechanism by which Mcm10 interacts with pol α on and off DNA is unclear. As a first step toward understanding the structural details for these critical intermolecular interactions, x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy were used to map the binary interfaces between Mcm10-ID, ssDNA, and p180. The crystal structure of an Mcm10-ID·ssDNA complex confirmed and extended our previous evidence that ssDNA binds within the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding-fold cleft of Mcm10-ID. We show using NMR chemical shift perturbation and fluorescence spectroscopy that p180 also binds to the OB-fold and that ssDNA and p180 compete for binding to this motif. In addition, we map a minimal Mcm10 binding site on p180 to a small region within the p180 N-terminal domain (residues 286–310). These findings, together with data for DNA and p180 binding to an Mcm10 construct that contains both the ID and CTD, provide the first mechanistic insight into how Mcm10 might use a handoff mechanism to load and stabilize pol α within the replication fork.To maintain their genomic integrity, cells must ensure complete and accurate DNA replication once per cell cycle. Consequently, DNA replication is a highly regulated and orchestrated series of molecular events. Multiprotein complexes assembled at origins of replication lead to assembly of additional proteins that unwind chromosomal DNA and synthesize nascent strands. The first event is the formation of a pre-replicative complex, which is composed of the origin recognition complex, Cdc6, Cdt1, and Mcm2–7 (for review, see Ref. 1). Initiation of replication at the onset of S-phase involves the activity of cyclin- and Dbf4-dependent kinases concurrent with recruitment of key factors to the origin. Among these, Mcm10 (2, 3) is recruited in early S-phase and is required for loading of Cdc45 (4). Mcm2–7, Cdc45, and the GINS complex form the replicative helicase (5–8). Origin unwinding is followed by loading of RPA,³ And-1/Ctf4, and pol α onto ssDNA (9–12). In addition, recruitment of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11/TopBP1 are essential for replication initiation (13, 14), and association of topoisomerase I, proliferating cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C, and the replicative DNA polymerases δ and ϵ completes the replisome (for review, see Ref. 15).Mcm10 is exclusive to eukaryotes and is essential to both initiation and elongation phases of chromosomal DNA replication (6, 8, 16). Mutations in Mcm10 in yeast result in stalled replication, cell cycle arrest, and cell death (2, 3, 17–19). These defects can be explained by the number of genetic and physical interactions between Mcm10 and many essential replication proteins, including origin recognition complex, Mcm2–7, and PCNA (3, 12, 20–24). In addition, Mcm10 has been shown to stimulate the phosphorylation of Mcm2–7 by Dbf4-dependent kinase in vitro (25). Thus, Mcm10 is an integral component of the replication machinery.Importantly, Mcm10 physically interacts with and stabilizes pol α and helps to maintain its association with chromatin (16, 26, 27). This is a critical interaction during replication because pol α is the only enzyme in eukaryotic cells that is capable of initiating DNA synthesis de novo. Indeed, Mcm10 stimulates the polymerase activity of pol α in vitro (28), and interestingly, the fission yeast Mcm10, but not Xenopus Mcm10, has been shown to exhibit primase activity (29, 30). Mcm10 is composed of three domains, the N-terminal (NTD), internal (ID), and C-terminal (CTD) domains (29). The NTD is presumably an oligomerization domain, whereas the ID and CTD both interact with DNA and pol α (29). The CTD is not found in yeast, whereas the ID is highly conserved among all eukaryotes. The crystal structure of Mcm10-ID showed that this domain is composed of an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB)-fold and a zinc finger motif, which form a unified DNA binding platform (31). An Hsp10-like motif important for the interaction with pol α has been identified in the sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm10-ID (16, 26).DNA pol α-primase is composed of four subunits: p180, p68, p58, and p48. The p180 subunit possesses the catalytic DNA polymerase activity, and disruption of this gene is lethal (32, 33). p58 and p48 form the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (primase) activity (34, 35), whereas the p68 subunit has no known catalytic activity but serves a regulatory role (36, 37). Pol α plays an essential role in lagging strand synthesis by first creating short (7–12 nucleotide) RNA primers followed by DNA extension. At the critical length of ∼30 nucleotides, replication factor C binds to the nascent strand to displace pol α and loads PCNA with pols δ and ϵ (for review, see Ref. 38).The interaction between Mcm10 and pol α has led to the suggestion that Mcm10 may help recruit the polymerase to the emerging replisome. However, the molecular details of this interaction and the mechanism by which Mcm10 may recruit and stabilize the pol α complex on DNA has not been investigated. Presented here is the high resolution structure of the conserved Mcm10-ID bound to ssDNA together with NMR chemical shift perturbation competition data for pol α binding in the presence of ssDNA. Collectively, these data demonstrate a shared binding site for DNA and pol α in the OB-fold cleft of Mcm10-ID, with a preference for ssDNA over pol α. In addition, we have mapped the Mcm10-ID binding site on pol α to a 24-residue segment of the N-terminal domain of p180. Based on these results, we propose Mcm10 helps to recruit pol α to origins of replication by a molecular hand-off mechanism.     

Base recognition of gap sites in DNA–DNA and DNA–RNA duplexes by short oligonucleotides

To increase base recognition capability and sensitivity, we propose the separation of a commonly used single-probe system for oligonucleotide analysis into a set of three probes: a fluorophore-labeled probe, a promoter probe, and a short probe. In this study, we found that the probes of only 4 nt in length can selectively bind the corresponding gap site on complexes consisting of the target, fluorophore-labeled probe, and promoter probe, exhibiting a more than 14-fold difference in ligation between the matched and mismatched sequences. Moreover, we demonstrated that the immobilized short probes accurately recognized the sequences of the gap sites.     

The Werner syndrome exonuclease facilitates DNA degradation and high fidelity DNA polymerization by human DNA polymerase δ

DNA Polymerase δ (Pol δ) and the Werner syndrome protein, WRN, are involved in maintaining cellular genomic stability. Pol δ synthesizes the lagging strand during replication of genomic DNA and also functions in the synthesis steps of DNA repair and recombination. WRN is a member of the RecQ helicase family, loss of which results in the premature aging and cancer-prone disorder, Werner syndrome. Both Pol δ and WRN encode 3' → 5' DNA exonuclease activities. Pol δ exonuclease removes 3'-terminal mismatched nucleotides incorporated during replication to ensure high fidelity DNA synthesis. WRN exonuclease degrades DNA containing alternate secondary structures to prevent formation and enable resolution of stalled replication forks. We now observe that similarly to WRN, Pol δ degrades alternate DNA structures including bubbles, four-way junctions, and D-loops. Moreover, WRN and Pol δ form a complex with enhanced ability to hydrolyze these structures. We also present evidence that WRN can proofread for Pol δ; WRN excises 3'-terminal mismatches to enable primer extension by Pol δ. Consistent with our in vitro observations, we show that WRN contributes to the maintenance of DNA synthesis fidelity in vivo. Cells expressing limiting amounts (～10% of normal) of WRN have elevated mutation frequencies compared with wild-type cells. Together, our data highlight the importance of WRN exonuclease activity and its cooperativity with Pol δ in preserving genome stability, which is compromised by the loss of WRN in Werner syndrome.     

Cloning and Characterization of the Human Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase, DNA Polymerase γ

The nuclear-encoded DNA polymerase γ (DNA POLγ) is the sole DNA polymerase required for the replication of the mitochondrial DNA. We have cloned the cDNA for human DNA POLγ and have mapped the gene to the chromosomal location 15q24. Additionally, the DNA POLγ gene fromDrosophila melanogasterand a partial cDNA for DNA POLγ fromGallus gallushave been cloned. The predicted human DNA POLγ polypeptide is 1239 amino acids, with a calculated molecular mass of 139.5 kDa. The human amino acid sequence is 41.6, 43.0, 48.7, and 77.6% identical to those ofSchizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster,and the C-terminal half ofG. gallus,respectively. Polyclonal antibodies raised against the polymerase portion of the protein reacted specifically with a 140-kDa protein in mitochondrial extracts and immunoprecipitated a protein with DNA POLγ like activity from mitochondrial extracts. The human DNA POLγ is unique in that the first exon of the gene contains a CAG₁₀trinucleotide repeat.     

Molecular modeling and spectroscopic studies of semustine binding with DNA and its comparison with lomustine–DNA adduct formation

Chloroethyl nitrosoureas constitute an important family of cancer chemotherapeutic agents, used in the treatment of various types of cancer. They exert antitumor activity by inducing DNA interstrand cross-links. Semustine, a chloroethyl nitrosourea, is a 4-methyl derivative of lomustine. There exist some interesting reports dealing with DNA-binding properties of chloroethyl nitrosoureas; however, underlying mechanism of cytotoxicity caused by semustine has not been precisely and completely delineated. The present work focuses on understanding semustine–DNA interaction to comprehend its anti-proliferative action at molecular level using various spectroscopic techniques. Attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy is used to determine the binding site of semustine on DNA. Conformational transition in DNA after semustine complexation is investigated using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Stability of semustine–DNA complexes is determined using absorption spectroscopy. Results of the present study demonstrate that semustine performs major-groove-directed DNA alkylation at guanine residues in an incubation-time–drug-concentration-dependent manner. CD spectral outcomes suggest partial transition of DNA from native B-conformation to C-form. Calculated binding constants (K_a) for semustine and lomustine interactions with DNA are 1.53?×?10³ M^?1 and 8.12?×?10³ M^?1, respectively. Moreover, molecular modeling simulation is performed to predict preferential binding orientation of semustine with DNA that corroborates well with spectral outcomes. Results based on comparative study of DNA-binding properties of semustine and lomustine, presented here, may establish a correlation between molecular structure and cytotoxicity of chloroethyl nitrosoureas that may be instrumental in the designing and synthesis of new nitrosourea therapeutics possessing better efficacy and fewer side effects.     

Interaction between DNA Polymerase β and BRCA1

The breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein is a tumor suppressor playing roles in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Studies of DNA repair functions of BRCA1 have focused on double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways and have recently included base excision repair (BER). However, the function of BRCA1 in BER is not well defined. Here, we examined a BRCA1 role in BER, first in relation to alkylating agent (MMS) treatment of cells and the BER enzyme DNA polymerase β (pol β). MMS treatment of BRCA1 negative human ovarian and chicken DT40 cells revealed hypersensitivity, and the combined gene deletion of BRCA1 and pol β in DT40 cells was consistent with these factors acting in the same repair pathway, possibly BER. Using cell extracts and purified proteins, BRCA1 and pol β were found to interact in immunoprecipitation assays, yet in vivo and in vitro assays for a BER role of BRCA1 were negative. An alternate approach with the human cells of immunofluorescence imaging and laser-induced DNA damage revealed negligible BRCA1 recruitment during the first 60 s after irradiation, the period typical of recruitment of pol β and other BER factors. Instead, 15 min after irradiation, BRCA1 recruitment was strong and there was γ-H2AX co-localization, consistent with DSBs and repair. The rapid recruitment of pol β was similar in BRCA1 positive and negative cells. However, a fraction of pol β initially recruited remained associated with damage sites much longer in BRCA1 positive than negative cells. Interestingly, pol β expression was required for BRCA1 recruitment, suggesting a partnership between these repair factors in DSB repair.     

Similarities and differences between “uncapped” telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks

Telomeric DNA is present at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and is bound by telomere “capping” proteins, which are the (Cdc13–Stn1–Ten1) CST complex, Ku (Yku70–Yku80), and Rap1–Rif1–Rif2 in budding yeast. Inactivation of any of these complexes causes telomere “uncapping,” stimulating a DNA damage response (DDR) that frequently involves resection of telomeric DNA and stimulates cell cycle arrest. This is presumed to occur because telomeres resemble one half of a DNA double-strand break (DSB). In this review, we outline the DDR that occurs at DSBs and compare it to the DDR occurring at uncapped telomeres, in both budding yeast and metazoans. We give particular attention to the resection of DSBs in budding yeast by Mre11–Xrs2–Rad50 (MRX), Sgs1/Dna2, and Exo1 and compare their roles at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. We also discuss how resection uncapped telomeres in budding yeast is promoted by the by 9–1–1 complex (Rad17–Mec3–Ddc1), to illustrate how analysis of uncapped telomeres can serve as a model for the DDR elsewhere in the genome. Finally, we discuss the role of the helicase Pif1 and its requirement for resection of uncapped telomeres, but not DSBs. Pif1 has roles in DNA replication and mammalian and plant CST complexes have been identified and have roles in global genome replication. Based on these observations, we suggest that while the DDR at uncapped telomeres is partially due to their resemblance to a DSB, it may also be partially due to defective DNA replication. Specifically, we propose that the budding yeast CST complex has dual roles to inhibit a DSB-like DDR initiated by Exo1 and a replication-associated DDR initiated by Pif1. If true, this would suggest that the mammalian CST complex inhibits a Pif1-dependent DDR.     

Human DNA Polymerase ν Catalyzes Correct and Incorrect DNA Synthesis with High Catalytic Efficiency

DNA polymerase ν (pol ν) is a low fidelity A-family polymerase with a putative role in interstrand cross-link repair and homologous recombination. We carried out pre-steady-state kinetic analysis to elucidate the kinetic mechanism of this enzyme. We found that the mechanism consists of seven steps, similar that of other A-family polymerases. pol ν binds to DNA with a K_d for DNA of 9.2 nm, with an off-rate constant of 0.013 s⁻¹and an on-rate constant of 14 μm⁻¹ s⁻¹. dNTP binding is rapid with K_d values of 20 and 476 μm for the correct and incorrect dNTP, respectively. Pyrophosphorylation occurs with a K_d value for PP_i of 3.7 mm and a maximal rate constant of 11 s⁻¹. Pre-steady-state kinetics, examination of the elemental effect using dNTPαS, and pulse-chase experiments indicate that a rapid phosphodiester bond formation step is flanked by slow conformational changes for both correct and incorrect base pair formation. These experiments in combination with computer simulations indicate that the first conformational change occurs with rate constants of 75 and 20 s⁻¹; rapid phosphodiester bond formation occurs with a K_eq of 2.2 and 1.7, and the second conformational change occurs with rate constants of 2.1 and 0.5 s⁻¹, for correct and incorrect base pair formation, respectively. The presence of a mispair does not induce the polymerase to adopt a low catalytic conformation. pol ν catalyzes both correct and mispair formation with high catalytic efficiency.     

DNA polymerase δ and ζ switch by sharing accessory subunits of DNA polymerase δ

Translesion DNA synthesis is an important branch of the DNA damage tolerance pathway that assures genomic integrity of living organisms. The mechanisms of DNA polymerase (Pol) switches during lesion bypass are not known. Here, we show that the C-terminal domain of the Pol ζ catalytic subunit interacts with accessory subunits of replicative DNA Pol δ. We also show that, unlike other members of the human B-family of DNA polymerases, the highly conserved and similar C-terminal domains of Pol δ and Pol ζ contain a [4Fe-4S] cluster coordinated by four cysteines. Amino acid changes in Pol ζ that prevent the assembly of the [4Fe-4S] cluster abrogate Pol ζ function in UV mutagenesis. On the basis of these data, we propose that Pol switches at replication-blocking lesions occur by the exchange of the Pol δ and Pol ζ catalytic subunits on a preassembled complex of accessory proteins retained on DNA during translesion DNA synthesis.     

XRCC1 and DNA polymerase β in cellular protection against cytotoxic DNA single-strand breaks

Single-strand breaks （SSBs） can occur in cells either directly, or indirectly following initiation of base excision repair （BER）. SSBs generally have blocked termini lacking the conventional 5＇-phosphate and 3＇-hydroxyl groups and require further processing prior to DNA synthesis and ligation. XRCC1 is devoid of any known enzymatic activity, but it can physically interact with other proteins involved in all stages of the overlapping SSB repair and BER pathways, including those that conduct the rate-limiting end-tailoring, and in many cases can stimulate their enzymatic activities. XRCC1^-/- mouse fibroblasts are most hypersensitive to agents that produce DNA lesions repaired by monofunctional glycosylase-initiated BER and that result in formation of indirect SSBs. A requirement for the deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity of DNA polymerase β （pol β） is specific to this pathway, whereas pol β is implicated in gap-filling during repair of many types of SSBs. Elevated levels of strand breaks, and diminished repair, have been demonstrated in MMS- treated XRCC1^-/-, and to a lesser extent in pol β^-/- cell lines, compared with wild-type cells. Thus a strong correlation is observed between cellular sensitivity to MMS and the ability of cells to repair MMS-induced damage. Exposure of wild-type and polβ^-/- cells to an inhibitor of PARP activity dramatically potentiates MMS-induced cytotoxicity. XRCC1^-/- cells are also sensitized by PARP inhibition demonstrating that PARP-mediated poly（ADP-ribosyl）ation plays a role in modulation of cytotoxicity beyond recruitment of XRCC 1 to sites of DNA damage.     

Effects of glutathione on chromium‐induced DNA. Crosslinking and DNA polymerase arrest

Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) is reduced intracellularly to Cr (V), Cr (IV) and Cr (III) by ascorbate (Asc), cysteine and glutathione (GSH). These metabolites induce a spectrum of genomic DNA damage resulting in the inhibition of DNA replication. Our previous studies have shown that treatment of DNA with Cr (III) or Cr (VI) plus Asc results in the formation of DNACrDNA crosslinks (CrDDC) and guaninespecific arrests of both prokaryotic and mammalian DNA polymerases. GSH not only acts as a reductant of Cr (VI) but also becomes crosslinked to DNA by Cr, thus, the focus of the present study was to examine the role of GSH in Crinduced DNA damage and polymerase arrests. Coincubation of Cr (III) with plasmid DNA in the presence of GSH led to the crosslinking of GSH to DNA. GSH cotreatment with Cr (III) also led to a decrease in the degree of Crinduced DNA interstrand crosslinks relative to Cr (III) alone, without affecting total Cr DNA binding. DNA polymerase arrests were observed following treatment of DNA with Cr (III) alone, but were markedly reduced when GSH was added to the reaction mixture. Preformed polymerasearresting lesions (CrDDC) were not removed by subsequent addition of GSH. Treatment of DNA with Cr (VI), in the presence of GSH, resulted in crosslinking of GSH to DNA, but failed to produce detectable DNA interstrand crosslinks or polymerase arrests. The inhibitory effect of GSH on Crinduced polymerase arrest was further confirmed in human genomic DNA using quantitative PCR (QPCR) analysis. Treatment of genomic DNA with Cr (III) resulted in a marked inhibition of the amplification of a 1.6 kb target fragment of the p53 gene by Taq polymerase. This was almost completely prevented by cotreatment with GSH and Cr (III). These results indicate that Crinduced DNA interstrand crosslinks, and not DNACrGSH crosslinks, are the principal lesions responsible for blocking DNA replication. Moreover, the formation of DNACrGSH crosslinks may actually preclude the formation of the polymerase arresting lesions.     

A molecular dynamics simulation study of polyamine– and sodium–DNA. Interplay between polyamine binding and DNA structure

Four different molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed for infinitely long ordered DNA molecules with different counterions, namely the two natural polyamines spermidine(3+) (Spd³⁺) and putrescine(2+) (Put²⁺), the synthetic polyamine diaminopropane(2+) (DAP²⁺), and the simple monovalent cation Na⁺. All systems comprised a periodical hexagonal cell with three identical DNA decamers, 15 water molecules per nucleotide, and counterions balancing the DNA charge. The simulation setup mimics the DNA state in oriented DNA fibers, previously studied using NMR and other experimental methods. In this paper the interplay between polyamine binding and local DNA structure is analyzed by investigating how and if the minor groove width of DNA depends on the presence and dynamics of the counterions. The results of the MD simulations reveal principal differences in the polyamine–DNA interactions between the natural [spermine(4+), Spd³⁺, Put²⁺] and the synthetic (DAP²⁺) polyamines.Abbreviations DAP diaminopropane - DDD Drew–Dickerson dodecamer - MD molecular dynamics - Put putrescine - RDF radial distribution function - Spd spermidine - Spm spermine