Extracellular control of cell size

Both cell growth (cell mass increase) and progression through the cell division cycle are required for sustained cell proliferation. Proliferating cells in culture tend to double in mass before each division, but it is not known how growth and division rates are co-ordinated to ensure that cell size is maintained. The prevailing view is that coordination is achieved because cell growth is rate-limiting for cell-cycle progression. Here, we challenge this view. We have investigated the relationship between cell growth and cell-cycle progression in purified rat Schwann cells, using two extracellular signal proteins that are known to influence these cells. We find that glial growth factor (GGF) can stimulate cell-cycle progression without promoting cell growth. We have used this restricted action of GGF to show that, for cultured Schwann cells, cell growth rate alone does not determine the rate of cell-cycle progression and that cell size at division is variable and depends on the concentrations of extracellular signal proteins that stimulate cell-cycle progression, cell growth, or both.     

Cell cycle and differentiation

The development of multicellular organisms relies on the temporal and spatial control of cell proliferation and cell growth. The relationship between cell-cycle progression and development is complex and characterized by mutual dependencies. On the level of the individual cell, this interrelationship has implications for pattern formation and cell morphogenesis. On a supercellular level, this interrelationship affects meristem function and organ growth. Often, developmental signals not only direct cell-cycle progression but also set the frame for cell-cycle regulation by determining cell-type-specific cell-cycle modes. In other cases, however, cell-cycle progression appears to be required for the further differentiation of some cell types. There are also examples in which cell cycle and differentiation seem to be controlled at the same level and progress rather independently from each other or are linked by the same regulator or pathway. Furthermore, different relationships between cell cycle and differentiation can be combined in a succession of events during development, leading to complex developmental programs.     

Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle

The repair of DNA lesions that occur endogenously or in response to diverse genotoxic stresses is indispensable for genome integrity. DNA lesions activate checkpoint pathways that regulate specific DNA-repair mechanisms in the different phases of the cell cycle. Checkpoint-arrested cells resume cell-cycle progression once damage has been repaired, whereas cells with unrepairable DNA lesions undergo permanent cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. Recent studies have provided insights into the mechanisms that contribute to DNA repair in specific cell-cycle phases and have highlighted the mechanisms that ensure cell-cycle progression or arrest in normal and cancerous cells.     

Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation

Normal cell-cycle progression is a crucial task for every multicellular organism, as it determines body size and shape, tissue renewal and senescence, and is also crucial for reproduction. On the other hand, dysregulation of the cell-cycle progression leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation is the hallmark of cancer. Therefore, it is not surprising that it is a tightly regulated process, with multifaceted and very complex control mechanisms. It is now well established that one of those mechanisms relies on ion channels, and in many cases specifically on potassium channels. Here, we summarize the possible mechanisms underlying the importance of potassium channels in cell-cycle control and briefly review some of the identified channels that illustrate the multiple ways in which this group of proteins can influence cell proliferation and modulate cell-cycle progression.     

Cell-cycle checkpoints that ensure coordination between nuclear and cytoplasmic events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cytoskeletal organization is crucial for several aspects of cell-cycle progression but cytoskeletal elements are quite sensitive to environmental perturbations. Two novel checkpoint controls monitor the function of the actin and microtubule systems in budding yeast and operate to delay cell-cycle progression in response to cytoskeletal perturbations. In cells whose actin cytoskeleton has been perturbed, bud formation is frequently delayed and the morphogenesis checkpoint introduces a compensatory delay of nuclear division until a bud has been formed. In cells whose microtubule cytoskeleton has been perturbed, anaphase spindle elongation often occurs entirely within the mother cell, and the post-anaphase nuclear migration checkpoint introduces a compensatory delay of cytokinesis until one pole of the anaphase nucleus enters the bud. Recent studies indicate that regulators of entry into mitosis are localized to the daughter side of the mother-bud neck whereas regulators of exit from mitosis are localized to the spindle pole bodies. Thus, specific cell-cycle regulators are well-placed to monitor whether a cell has formed a bud and whether a daughter nucleus has been delivered accurately to the bud following mitosis.     

Insulin delays the progression of Drosophila cells through G2/M by activating the dTOR/dRaptor complex

In Drosophila and mammals, insulin signalling can increase growth, progression through G1/S, cell size and tissue size. Here, we analyse the way insulin affects cell size and cell-cycle progression in two haemocyte-derived Drosophila cell lines. Surprisingly, we find that although insulin increases cell size, it slows the rate at which these cells increase in number. By using BrdU pulse-chase to label S-phase cells and follow their progression through the cell cycle, we show that insulin delays progression through G2/M, thereby slowing cell division. The ability of insulin to slow progression through G2/M is independent of its ability to stimulate progression through G1/S, so is not a consequence of feedback by the cell-cycle machinery to maintain cell-cycle length. Insulin's effects on progression through G2/M are mediated by dTOR/dRaptor signalling. Partially inhibiting dTOR/dRaptor signalling by dsRNAi or mild rapamycin treatment can increase cell number in cultured haemocytes and the Drosophila wing, respectively. Thus, insulin signalling can influence cell number depending on a balance between its ability to accelerate progression through G1/S and delay progression through G2/M.     

Cell cycle and cell-fate determination in Drosophila neural cell lineages

"Normal" development requires a finely tuned equilibrium between cell differentiation and cell proliferation. Important issues in development include whether the cell cycle controls the cell-fate determination and whether cell identity in turn regulates cell-cycle progression. Although, these issues are of general biological relevance, stereotyped Drosophila neural lineages are particularly suited to address these questions and have provided insights into the links between cell-cycle progression and cell-fate specification.     

Small-molecule inhibitors of the cell cycle

The cell cycle remains an attractive target for the development of small-molecule inhibitors for use as both novel chemotherapeutics and research probes. Given the importance of cytoskeletal dynamics and cyclin-dependent kinases for cell-cycle progression, much interest has focused on the identification of anti-mitotic agents and kinase inhibitors. However recent advances in cell-based screening technologies and an increased interest in inhibitors with greater specificity are beginning to influence the search for novel cell-cycle inhibitors.     

The ins and outs of the plant cell cycle

Plant growth and development are driven by the continuous generation of new cells. Whereas much has been learned at a molecular level about the mechanisms that orchestrate progression through the different cell-cycle phases, little is known about how the cell-cycle machinery operates in the context of an entire plant and contributes to growth, cell differentiation and the formation of new tissues and organs. Here, we discuss how intrinsic developmental signals and environmental cues affect cell-cycle entry and exit.     

Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1

Activation of stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) is essential for proper cell adaptation to extracellular stimuli. The exposure of yeast cells to high osmolarity, or mutations that lead to activation of the Hog1 SAPK, result in cell-cycle arrest. The mechanisms by which Hog1 and SAPKs in general regulate cell-cycle progression are not completely understood. Here we show that Hog1 regulates cell cycle progression at the G1 phase by a dual mechanism that involves downregulation of cyclin expression and direct targeting of the CDK-inhibitor protein Sic1. Hog1 interacts physically with Sic1 in vivo and in vitro, and phosphorylates a single residue at the carboxyl terminus of Sic1, which, in combination with the downregulation of cyclin expression, results in Sic1 stabilization and inhibition of cell-cycle progression. Cells lacking Sic1 or containing a Sic1 allele mutated in the Hog1 phosphorylation site are unable to arrest at G1 phase after Hog1 activation, and become sensitive to osmostress. Together, our data indicate that the Sic1 CDK-inhibitor is the molecular target for the SAPK Hog1 that is required to modulate cell-cycle progression in response to stress.     

The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control

Tight control of cell proliferation is required to ensure normal tissue patterning and prevent cancer formation. The analysis of cultured cells has led to an explosion in our understanding of the molecules that trigger growth and mediate cell-cycle progression. However, the mechanism by which the local growth differentials that drive morphogenesis are established and maintained still remains unknown. Here we review recent work that reveals the importance of cell binding to the extracellular matrix, and associated changes in cell shape and cytoskeletal tension, to the spatial control of cell-cycle progression. These findings change the paradigm of cell-growth control, by placing our understanding of molecular signalling cascades in the context of the structural and mechanical complexity of living tissues.     

Capacity for resolution of Ras-MAPK-initiated early pathogenic myocardial hypertrophy modeled in mice

Activation of Ras signaling in cardiomyocytes has been linked to pathogenic myocardial hypertrophy progression and subsequent heart failure. Whether cardiomyopathy can regress once initiated needs to be established more fully. A 'tet-off' system was used to regulate expression of H-Ras-G12V in myocardium to examine whether Ras-induced pathogenic myocardial hypertrophy could resolve after removal of Ras signaling in vivo. Ras activation at weaning for 2 wk caused hypertrophy, whereas activation for 4 to 8 wk led to cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Discontinuing H-Ras-G12V transgene expression after cardiomyopathy onset led to improved survival and cardiomyopathy lesion scores, with reduced heart:body weight ratios, demonstrating the reversibility of early pathogenic hypertrophy. Activation of Ras and downstream ERK 1/2 was associated with elevated expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and cyclins B1 and D1, indicating cell-cycle activation and reentry. Coordinate elevation of broad-spectrum cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p21, p27, and p57) and Tyr15 phosphorylation of cdc2 signified the activation of cell-cycle checkpoints; absence of cell-cycle completion and cardiomyocyte replication were documented by using immunohistochemistry for mitosis and cytokinesis markers. After resolution of cardiomyopathy, cell-cycle activators and inhibitors examined returned to basal levels, a change that we interpreted as exit from the cell cycle. Cardiac cell-cycle regulation plays a role in recovery from pathogenic hypertrophy. The model we present provides a means to further explore the underlying mechanisms governing cell-cycle capacity in cardiomyocytes, as well as progression and regression of pathogenic cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.     

Timing cell-fate determination during asymmetric cell divisions

From invertebrates to mammals, cell-cycle progression during an asymmetric cell division is accompanied by precisely timed redistribution of cell-fate determinants so that they segregate asymmetrically to enable the two daughter cells to choose different fates. Interestingly, studies on how cell fates are specified in such divisions reveal that the same fate determinants can be reiteratively used to specify a variety of cell types through multiple rounds of cell divisions or to exert seemingly contradictory effects on cell proliferation and differentiation. Here I summarize the molecular mechanisms governing asymmetric cell division and review recent findings pointing to a novel mechanism for coupling intracellular signaling and cell-cycle progression. This mechanism uses changes in the morphology, subcellular distribution, and molecular composition of cellular organelles like the Golgi apparatus and centrosomes, which not only accompany the progression of cell cycle to activate but also temporally constrain the activity of fate determinants during asymmetric cell divisions.     

Assembly and persistence of primary cilia in dividing Drosophila spermatocytes

Basal bodies are freed from cilia and transition into?centrioles to organize centrosomes in dividing cells. A mutually exclusive centriole/basal body existence during cell-cycle progression has become a widely accepted principle. Contrary to this view, we?show here that cilia assemble and persist through?two meiotic divisions in Drosophila spermatocytes. Remarkably, all four centrioles assemble primary cilia-centriole complexes that transit from the plasma membrane encased in a packet of membrane, recruit centrosomal material into microtubule-organizing centers, and persist at the spindle poles through division. Thus, spermatocyte centrioles organize centrosomes and cilia simultaneously at cell division. These findings challenge the prevailing view that cilia antagonize cell-cycle progression and raise the possibility that cilium retention at cell division may occur in diverse organisms and cell types.     

Hedgehogs as Negative Regulators of the Cell Cycle

During the development of multicellular animals, cell proliferation must be precisely controlled, as deregulated proliferation can lead to overgrowth and cancer. In addition, proliferation must be tightly integrated with pattern formation and differentiation to generate the required number of cells in the right organs, and at the right time. All major signaling pathways employed during embryogenesis have been implicated in cell cycle regulation, indicating that no single pathway has been dedicated to this task. Also, the precise role of a particular signaling pathway in regulating proliferation is highly dependent on the cellular context, and may have opposite effects on cell-cycle progression in different cells and tissues. The Hedgehog (Hh) family of signaling proteins is known to control both differentiation and proliferation during development. So far, studies addressing the effect of Hh signaling on proliferation have shown it to have a stimulatory effect on cell-cycle progression. Here we review several recent studies indicating that Hh signaling can also have the opposite effect, directing cell-cycle exit in a number of cell types in vertebrate and in invertebrate embryos.